Regulation of ferritin-mediated cytoplasmic iron storage by the ferric uptake regulator homolog (Fur) of Helicobacter pylori

Homologs of the ferric uptake regulator Fur and the iron storage protein ferritin play a central role in maintaining iron homeostasis in bacteria. The gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori contains an iron-induced prokaryotic ferritin (Pfr) which has been shown to be involved in protection against metal toxicity and a Fur homolog which has not been functionally characterized in H. pylori. Analysis of an isogenic fur-negative mutant revealed that H. pylori Fur is required for metal-dependent regulation of ferritin. Iron starvation, as well as medium supplementation with nickel, zinc, copper, and manganese at nontoxic concentrations, repressed synthesis of ferritin in the wild-type strain but not in the H. pylori fur mutant. Fur-mediated regulation of ferritin synthesis occurs at the mRNA level. With respect to the regulation of ferritin expression, Fur behaves like a global metal-dependent repressor which is activated under iron-restricted conditions but also responds to different metals. Downregulation of ferritin expression by Fur might secure the availability of free iron in the cytoplasm, especially if iron is scarce or titrated out by other metals.     

Effect of Salmonella typhimurium ferric uptake regulator (fur) mutations on iron- and pH-regulated protein synthesis.

Fur is an important regulatory protein known to function in the presence of iron as a repressor of iron-controlled genes. It was recently discovered that Fur is also essential to Salmonella typhimurium for mounting an adaptive acid tolerance response (J. W. Foster, J. Bacteriol 173:6896-6902, 1991). Because little is known about the effect of Fur on the physiology of this enteric pathogen, a systematic two-dimensional polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) analysis was conducted to identify proteins whose synthesis is linked to iron levels. Mutations in the fur locus were identified and used to classify which proteins are controlled by Fur. Thirty-six proteins were overtly affected by iron availability, most of which were clearly under the control of Fur. Although most of the Fur-dependent proteins were under negative control, a significant portion (15 of 34) appeared to be under a form of positive control. Nine of the positively controlled proteins required Fur and iron for expression. However, Fur lacking iron was also required for the induction of six gene products. Surprisingly, not all iron-regulated proteins were controlled by Fur and not all Fur-dependent proteins were obviously regulated by iron status. Because fur mutants fail to mount an effective acid tolerance response, we made a comparative two-dimensional PAGE analysis of 100 total acid- and iron-regulated gene products. Production of most of these proteins was regulated by only one of the two stresses, yet a clear subset of seven genes were influenced by both acid and iron and were also controlled by fur. These proteins were also members of the acid tolerance response modulon. Consistent with the fur effect on pH-regulated protein synthesis, fur mutants lacked the inducible pH homeostasis system associated with the acid tolerance response. The results provide further evidence that Fur has an extensive impact on gene expression and cellular physiology and suggest an explanation for the acid-sensitive nature of fur mutants.     

Functional domains of theEscherichia coli ferric uptake regulator protein (Fur)

The functions of N- and C-terminal domains of the Fur repressor ofEscherichia coli in promoter recognition and dimerization were studied. We investigated the ability of fusion proteins containing the N- or C-terminal domain of Fur to dimerize and to repress a Fur-regulatedlacZ fusion gene. The N-terminal domain, when fused to the C-terminal domain of the repressor C1857, repressed a Fur-regulatedlacZ fusion. However, the Fur-CI857 fusion was unable to complement the growth defect of anE. coli fur mutant on fumarate and succinate. The C-terminal domain of Fur, when fused to the N-terminus of CI857, repressed a λP, -regulatedlacZ fusion, indicating dimerization of the chimeric protein, which is a prerequisite for Cl activity. Both fusion proteins were fully active under both iron-rich and iron-poor growth conditions. We conclude that the N-terminal domain of Fur is involved in recognition of the Fur-responsive promoter and the C-terminus mediates oligomerization of the repressor.     

Functional domains of theEscherichia coli ferric uptake regulator protein (Fur)

The functions of N- and C-terminal domains of the Fur repressor ofEscherichia coli in promoter recognition and dimerization were studied. We investigated the ability of fusion proteins containing the N- or C-terminal domain of Fur to dimerize and to repress a Fur-regulatedlacZ fusion gene. The N-terminal domain, when fused to the C-terminal domain of the repressor C1857, repressed a Fur-regulatedlacZ fusion. However, the Fur-CI857 fusion was unable to complement the growth defect of anE. coli fur mutant on fumarate and succinate. The C-terminal domain of Fur, when fused to the N-terminus of CI857, repressed a P, -regulatedlacZ fusion, indicating dimerization of the chimeric protein, which is a prerequisite for Cl activity. Both fusion proteins were fully active under both iron-rich and iron-poor growth conditions. We conclude that the N-terminal domain of Fur is involved in recognition of the Fur-responsive promoter and the C-terminus mediates oligomerization of the repressor.