Determinants of the assembly,integrity and maintenance of the endoplasmic reticulum‐peroxisome tether

Organelle tethering and intercommunication are crucial for proper cell function. We previously described a tether between peroxisomes and the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) that acts in peroxisome population control in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Components of this tether are Pex3p, an integral membrane protein of both peroxisomes and the ER and Inp1p, a connector that links peroxisomes to the ER. Here, we report the analysis of random Inp1p mutants that enabled identification of regions in Inp1p required for the assembly and maintenance of the ER‐peroxisome tether. Interaction analysis between Inp1p mutants and known Inp1p‐binding proteins demonstrated that Pex3p and Inp1p do not constitute the sole components of the ER‐peroxisome tether. Deletion of these Inp1p interactors whose steady‐state localization is outside of ER‐peroxisome tethers affected peroxisome dynamics. Our findings are consistent with the presence of regulatory cues that act on ER‐peroxisome tethers and point to the existence of membrane contact sites between peroxisomes and organelles other than the ER.      

Alternating terminal electron‐acceptors at the basis of symbiogenesis: How oxygen ignited eukaryotic evolution

What kind of symbiosis between archaeon and bacterium gave rise to their eventual merger at the origin of the eukaryotes? I hypothesize that conditions favouring bacterial uptake were based on exchange of intermediate carbohydrate metabolites required by recurring changes in availability and use of the two different terminal electron chain acceptors, the bacterial one being oxygen. Oxygen won, and definitive loss of the archaeal membrane potential allowed permanent establishment of the bacterial partner as the proto‐mitochondrion, further metabolic integration and highly efficient ATP production. This represents initial symbiogenesis, when crucial eukaryotic traits arose in response to the archaeon‐bacterium merger. The attendant generation of internal reactive oxygen species (ROS) gave rise to a myriad of further eukaryotic adaptations, such as extreme mitochondrial genome reduction, nuclei, peroxisomes and meiotic sex. Eukaryotic origins could have started with shuffling intermediate metabolites as is still essential today.

     

Cross‐compartment proteostasis regulation during redox imbalance induced ER stress

Imbalance in protein homeostasis in specific subcellular organelles is alleviated through organelle‐specific stress response pathways. As a canonical example of stress activated pathway, accumulation of misfolded proteins in ER activates unfolded protein response (UPR) in almost all eukaryotic organisms. However, very little is known about the involvement of proteins of other organelles that help to maintain the cellular protein homeostasis during ER stress. In this study, using iTRAQ‐based LC–MS approach, we identified organelle enriched proteins that are differentially expressed in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) during ER stress in the absence of UPR sensor Ire1p. We have identified about 750 proteins from enriched organelle fraction in three independent iTRAQ experiments. Induction of ER stress resulted in the differential expression of 93 proteins in WT strains, 40 of which were found to be dependent on IRE1. Our study reveals a cross‐talk between ER‐ and mitochondrial proteostasis exemplified by an Ire1p‐dependent induction of Hsp60p, a mitochondrial chaperone. Thus, in this study, we show changes in protein levels in various organelles in response to ER stress. A large fraction of these changes were dependent on canonical UPR signalling through Ire1, highlighting the importance of interorganellar cross‐talk during stress.     

An ER‐peroxisome tether exerts peroxisome population control in yeast

Eukaryotic cells compartmentalize biochemical reactions into membrane‐enclosed organelles that must be faithfully propagated from one cell generation to the next. Transport and retention processes balance the partitioning of organelles between mother and daughter cells. Here we report the identification of an ER‐peroxisome tether that links peroxisomes to the ER and ensures peroxisome population control in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The tether consists of the peroxisome biogenic protein, Pex3p, and the peroxisome inheritance factor, Inp1p. Inp1p bridges the two compartments by acting as a molecular hinge between ER‐bound Pex3p and peroxisomal Pex3p. Asymmetric peroxisome division leads to the formation of Inp1p‐containing anchored peroxisomes and Inp1p‐deficient mobile peroxisomes that segregate to the bud. While peroxisomes in mother cells are not released from tethering, de novo formation of tethers in the bud assists in the directionality of peroxisome transfer. Peroxisomes are thus stably maintained over generations of cells through their continued interaction with tethers.     

A Combined Approach of Quantitative Interaction Proteomics and Live-cell Imaging Reveals a Regulatory Role for Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) Reticulon Homology Proteins in Peroxisome Biogenesis

Peroxisome biogenesis initiates at the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and maturation allows for the formation of metabolically active organelles. Yet, peroxisomes can also multiply by growth and division. Several proteins, called peroxins, are known to participate in these processes but little is known about their organization to orchestrate peroxisome proliferation. Here, we demonstrate that regulation of peroxisome proliferation relies on the integrity of the tubular ER network. Using a dual track SILAC-based quantitative interaction proteomics approach, we established a comprehensive network of stable as well as transient interactions of the peroxin Pex30p, an integral membrane protein. Through association with merely ER resident proteins, in particular with proteins containing a reticulon homology domain, and with other peroxins, Pex30p designates peroxisome contact sites at ER subdomains. We show that Pex30p traffics through the ER and segregates in punctae to which peroxisomes specifically append, and we ascertain its transient interaction with all subunits of the COPI coatomer complex suggesting the involvement of a vesicle-mediated transport. We establish that the membrane protein Pex30p facilitates the connection of peroxisomes to the ER. Taken together, our data indicate that Pex30p-containing protein complexes act as focal points from which peroxisomes can form and that the tubular ER architecture organized by the reticulon homology proteins Rtn1p, Rtn2p and Yop1p controls this process.All nucleated cells contain essential round-shaped organelles called peroxisomes, whose function is mainly associated with lipid metabolism (1). Depending on the cellular requirements, the size, number, and protein content of these single membrane-bound organelles can vary widely. Although peroxisomes are dispensable for unicellular species such as yeasts, they are essential for the development of multicellular organisms (2, 3). In human, mutations in PEX genes lead to defects in peroxisome function or formation and are associated with the development of lethal pathologies (4). These PEX genes code for proteins, called peroxins, which are involved in peroxisome assembly and maintenance (5).Two major routes seem to lead to peroxisome formation, namely, de novo biogenesis and growth/division of pre-existing peroxisomes. The division pathway operates with proteins of the Pex11 family and requires fission factors shared with mitochondria (6). Studies in yeast and mammalian cells revealed that through the action of the protein Pex3p peroxisome precursors can also originate from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)¹ and, via import of membrane and matrix proteins, mature into fully functional organelles (7, 8). Furthermore, several peroxisomal membrane proteins were shown to migrate to peroxisomes via the ER (7, 9, 10). The molecular mechanism underlying the biogenic pathway of peroxisome formation has not been clarified so far. Recent data based on cell-free vesicle-budding reactions, however, demonstrated that several peroxisomal proteins traffic from the ER to peroxisomes in a COPII vesicle-independent manner (11). These observations point to the existence of vesicular events to mediate the transport of peroxisomal membrane proteins from the ER. In fact, analysis of secretory mutant yeast cells already suggest that part of the ER-associated secretory machinery is involved in peroxisome biogenesis (12).The de novo biogenesis of peroxisomes and the growth/division pathways are usually seen as independent routes; however, these events may be coordinated and, thus, intimately linked. Indeed, peroxisomes need to acquire membrane components to proliferate and it has been proposed that their binding to the cell cortex or to the cytoskeleton allows their partitioning and segregation during cell division (13–15).Among the proteins required for assembly of peroxisomes, the membrane proteins Pex23p and Pex24p play essential roles in the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica (16, 17). Homologs of these two proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae are Pex30p, Pex31p, and Pex32p, all containing at least one transmembrane domain and a dysferlin domain as common structural motifs, as well as Pex28p and Pex29p. In S. cerevisiae, these proteins seem to negatively control peroxisomal size and number (18, 19). Interestingly, Pex30p seems to exhibit species-specific differences in the regulation of peroxisome proliferation. While the lack of Pex30p in S. cerevisiae leads to an increase in the number of normal-sized peroxisomes (18), in Pichia pastoris its absence correlates with the appearance of fewer and clustered peroxisomes (20). Although peroxisomes are highly versatile organelles, under given conditions their total number per cell remains fairly constant owing to the delicate balance of proliferation, inheritance and degradation (21, 22). The question is: what are the molecular mechanisms responsible for the spatiotemporal organization of these events?Here, we present data obtained from a dual approach based on quantitative interaction proteomics using stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) (23, 24) and live-cell imaging, revealing for the first time the dynamic interaction network around Pex30p and its function in the organization of ER-to-peroxisome membrane associations. We report the existence of a macromolecular membrane protein complex that acts as a hub for the regulation of peroxisome proliferation and movement. Our data suggest a direct role for the tubular cortical ER and the reticulon homology proteins Rtn1p, Rtn2p, and Yop1p in the regulation of peroxisome biogenesis. Furthermore, as an initially cortical-ER localized protein that interacts with reticulon homology proteins, Pex30p is shown in this work to establish contacts between ER tubules and peroxisomes and to specifically traffic through the ER. In summary, our data reveal a central role for Pex30p in the formation of ER-to-peroxisomes associations that appear to be involved in the coordination of peroxisome biogenesis and maintenance.     

Multiple Domains in PEX16 Mediate Its Trafficking and Recruitment of Peroxisomal Proteins to the ER

Peroxisomes rely on a diverse array of mechanisms to ensure the specific targeting of their protein constituents. Peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs), for instance, are targeted by at least two distinct pathways: directly to peroxisomes from their sites of synthesis in the cytosol or indirectly via the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, the extent to which each PMP targeting pathway is involved in the maintenance of pre‐existing peroxisomes is unclear. Recently, we showed that human PEX16 plays a critical role in the ER‐dependent targeting of PMPs by mediating the recruitment of two other PMPs, PEX3 and PMP34, to the ER. Here, we extend these results by carrying out a comprehensive mutational analysis of PEX16 aimed at gaining insights into the molecular targeting signals responsible for its ER‐to‐peroxisome trafficking and the domain(s) involved in PMP recruitment function at the ER. We also show that the recruitment of PMPs to the ER by PEX16 is conserved in plants. The implications of these results in terms of the function of PEX16 and the role of the ER in peroxisome maintenance in general are discussed.      

Give what you can and keep what you need!

EMBO J 32 18, 2439–2453 doi:10.1038/emboj.2013.170; published online July302013During cell division, peroxisomes are inherited to daughter cells but some are retained in the mother cells. Our knowledge on how peroxisome inheritance and retention is balanced and how this is regulated for each individual organelle remains incompletely understood. The new findings by Knoblach et al (2013) published in this issue of The EMBO Journal demonstrate that Inp1p functions as a bridging protein to connect ER-resident Pex3p and peroxisomal Pex3p, which anchors peroxisomes to the cortical ER for organelle retention in the mother cell. Asymmetric peroxisome division generates peroxisomes, which lack Inp1p but contain Inp2p instead, and only these peroxisomes are primed for myosin-driven transport to daughter cells.Peroxisomes are single membrane-bound organelles found in almost all eukaryotic cells. They harbour a wide spectrum of metabolic activities that vary among different species, developmental stages and cell types (Schlüter et al, 2010). Eukaryotic cells have evolved elaborate mechanisms to ensure the maintenance of peroxisomes. New peroxisomes can form either de novo by budding from the ER or by growth and division of pre-existing organelles (Lazarow and Fujiki, 1985; Hoepfner et al, 2005). Despite the fact that peroxisomes can form de novo, yeast favours to multiply peroxisomes by growth and division (Motley and Hettema, 2007). It therefore has to be ensured that both mother and daughter cells get their share of peroxisomes during cell division. Thus, some peroxisomes need to be retained in the mother cell, while other peroxisomes are directed for transport and inheritance to daughter cells. Both processes have to be balanced to ensure a successful distribution of the organelles between the mother cell and the newly formed bud.The molecular details of how an even peroxisome distribution of dividing cells are maintained have now been disclosed by Knoblach et al (2013), advancing an exciting scientific journey. This journey originally started by the finding that the partitioning of peroxisomes between mother cell and bud is dependent on actin filaments and the myosin motor protein Myo2p (Hoepfner et al, 2001). Inp1p and Inp2p were identified by the Rachubinski group and Inp2p turned out to function as the peroxisomal tether, which interacts with Myo2p and hooks the organelle onto the actin-track on the road to the bud (Fagarasanu et al, 2006). Inp1p was shown to be a peripheral peroxisomal membrane protein, which acts as a peroxisome-retention factor, tethering peroxisomes to putative anchoring structures within the mother cell and bud (Fagarasanu et al, 2005). Later on, Pex3p, a multi-functional protein of the peroxisomal life cycle, was identified as peroxisomal membrane anchor of Inp1p (Munck et al, 2009). Until now, it was therefore known that peroxisomes hook onto Inp1p by Pex3p and Inp1p connects peroxisomes to cortical structures of unknown nature. Thus, it was an open question how peroxisomes are trapped in the mother cell and which additional factors are required for this process.The work of Knoblach et al (2013) published in this issue of The EMBO Journal now unravelled this mystery, allowing for a more complete picture of the whole process of peroxisome retention and inheritance (Figure 1A). The authors show that peroxisomes are recruited to mitochondria that artificially expose Inp1p on their surface, clearly demonstrating that Inp1p acts as a peroxisome tether. Most importantly, they identified the mechanism of how peroxisomes are directed and anchored to the cell cortex: the ER acts as a membrane anchor for the retention of peroxisomes during cell division. In vitro binding assays revealed that Inp1p contains two independent binding sites for Pex3p, located at the C- and the N-terminal region of the protein, respectively. Since Pex3p exhibits a dual localization at the peroxisomal membrane and at the ER, Inp1p seems to bind to Pex3p of both compartments in vivo and thus link Pex3p molecules across two membranes. Indeed, it turned out that ER-located Pex3p recruits Inp1p to discrete foci in close proximity to the cortical ER. Using the split-GFP assay, the authors confirmed that Inp1p interacts not only with ER-bound Pex3p but also with Pex3p in the peroxisomal membrane. Thus, the core of the ER-peroxisome tether is generated by the Inp1p-mediated linkage of ER-bound Pex3p with peroxisomal Pex3p. The functional relevance of this ER-peroxisome tether is disclosed by the phenotype of peroxisome inheritance mutants. Accordingly, the Pex3p–V81E mutant, affected in the recruitment of Inp1p to the ER, is characterized by a defect of ER retention of peroxisomes, which drives all peroxisomes into the bud and leaves no peroxisomes in the mother cell (Figure 1B).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Peroxisome retention and inheritance (A) free peroxisomes in the mother cell (stage I) are anchored to cortical ER by a tethering complex consisting of two molecules Pex3p, one located at the ER and the other associated with the peroxisomal membrane and Inp1p, which connects the ER-bound and peroxisome-bound Pex3p (stage II). Accordingly, Inp1p contains two Pex3p-binding domains, allowing the protein to function as a bridge between the two Pex3p-containing organelles. Peroxisomes elongate and divide, and Inp2p is loaded onto peroxisomes with an asymmetric distribution (stage III). The peroxisomal population that lacks Inp2p is anchored to the cortical ER, whereas the population of cytosolic peroxisomes containing Inp2p is destined for the transport to the bud (stage IV). To this end, Inp2p interacts with Myo2p and thus triggers the movement of the peroxisome along actin cables to the bud. The process is completed when the peroxisome is released from Myo2p in the bud (stage I). In wild-type cells, the described retention and inheritance process leads to an equal distribution of peroxisomes between mother cell. The described molecular mechanism results in a regulated balance of retention and inheritance of peroxisomes, ensuring that both the mother cell and the newly formed bud gain their share of peroxisomes. (B) However, when the endogenous Pex3p is replaced by a Pex3p-mutant (Pex3p–V81E), which lost its strong binding capacity to Inp1p, peroxisomes are not anchored to the cortical ER anymore, with the consequence that during cells'' division the entire organelle population is transported to the bud and peroxisomes are not retained in the mother cell.To piece together the puzzle, a final gap had to be filled. How is the peroxisomal fraction remaining in the mother cell discriminated from those ferried to the bud during cell division? In budding wild-type cells, Inp1p exhibits a striking asymmetry along the cell division axis. Knoblach et al (2013) show that most peroxisomes of the mother cell contain Inp1p, while peroxisomes that are ferried towards the bud contain little or no Inp1p. Live-cell video microscopy of individual peroxisome revealed that Inp1p-containing peroxisomes were mostly immobile and retained in the mother cell, while highly mobile peroxisomes contained Inp2p and were predominantly found in the bud. The question remains of how peroxisomes lacking Inp1p but containing Inp2p are formed? To tackle this question, the authors took advantage of the fact that cells defective in peroxisome division contain single enlarged peroxisomes and project a tubular extension into the bud upon cell division (Kuravi et al, 2006). Remarkably, Knoblach et al (2013) show that Inp1p and Inp2p localized to opposite ends of the giant peroxisome. Inp1p was confined to the part of the peroxisome that was retained in the mother cell, while Inp2p enriched at the tubule that protruded into the bud.In summary, Knoblach et al (2013) discovered the ER as the site for peroxisome binding to the cell cortex that is responsible for the retention of peroxisomes in the mother cells during cell division and identified Inp1p as a molecular hinge connecting Pex3p of peroxisomal and ER membranes. Furthermore, peroxisome division is shown to result in an asymmetric distribution of inheritance factors with Inp1p-containing organelles remaining tethered to the ER in the mother cell, while Inp2p-containing peroxisomes hook onto myosin motor proteins for movement to the bud. These remarkable discoveries disclose the molecular mechanism of peroxisome retention and inheritance during cell division. Moreover, this study adds to other known functions of Pex3p, which besides its newly discovered role as ER-tether for peroxisomes is also known as an initiator of de novo formation of peroxisomes, a docking factor for the transport of peroxisomal membrane proteins and a tether for the regulated degradation of peroxisomes. This study adds more complexity to the network of regulated processes in peroxisome biogenesis that all merge at Pex3p, and will certainly provide the ground for further exploration.     

Divide et Impera: The Dictum of Peroxisomes

Peroxisomes are unique organelles which display properties of autonomous organelles, as they can multiply by fission of pre‐existing ones. Peroxisomes, however, can also develop from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). This process has convincingly been shown in peroxisome‐deficient yeast cells, upon reintroduction of the corresponding gene. Whether peroxisomes also are formed from the ER in wild‐type cells that contain peroxisomes is still under debate. Also, the existence of vesicular transport pathways between peroxisomes and the ER is still unresolved. Several new proteins and pathways that play a role in peroxisome proliferation have been identified in the last few years. A surprising finding was that proteins well known for their function in mitochondrial fission (Fis1, Dnm1) are responsible for peroxisome fission as well. In this contribution we discuss recent advancements in research on peroxisome proliferation.     

A two‐component enzyme complex is required for dolichol biosynthesis in tomato

Dolichol plays an indispensable role in the N‐glycosylation of eukaryotic proteins. As proteins enter the secretory pathway they are decorated by a ‘glycan’, which is preassembled onto a membrane‐anchored dolichol molecule embedded within the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Genetic and biochemical evidence in yeast and animals indicate that a cis‐prenyltransferase (CPT) is required for dolichol synthesis, but also point to other factor(s) that could be involved. In this study, RNAi‐mediated suppression of one member of the tomato CPT family (SlCPT3) resulted in a ~60% decrease in dolichol content. We further show that the involvement of SlCPT3 in dolichol biosynthesis requires the participation of a distantly related partner protein, designated as CPT‐binding protein (SlCPTBP), which is a close homolog of the human Nogo‐B receptor. Yeast two‐hybrid and co‐immunoprecipitation assays demonstrate that SlCPT3 and its partner protein interact in vivo and that both SlCPT3 and SlCPTBP are required to complement the growth defects and dolichol deficiency of the yeast dolichol mutant, rer2?. Co‐expression of SlCPT3 and SlCPTBP in yeast and in E. coli confirmed that dolichol synthase activity strictly requires both proteins. Finally, organelle isolation and in vivo localization of fluorescent protein fusions showed that both SlCPT3 and SlCPTBP localize to the ER, the site of dolichol accumulation and synthesis in eukaryotes.     

Mitochondrial dynamics in the pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus: therapeutic and evolutionary implications

Mitochondria within eukaryotic cells continuously fuse and divide. This phenomenon is called mitochondrial dynamics and crucial for mitochondrial function and integrity. We performed a comprehensive analysis of mitochondrial dynamics in the pathogenic mold Aspergillus fumigatus. Phenotypic characterization of respective mutants revealed the general essentiality of mitochondrial fusion for mitochondrial genome maintenance and the mold's viability. Surprisingly, it turned out that the mitochondrial rhomboid protease Pcp1 and its processing product, s‐Mgm,1 which are crucial for fusion in yeast, are dispensable for fusion, mtDNA maintenance and viability in A. fumigatus. In contrast, mitochondrial fission mutants show drastically reduced growth and sporulation rates and increased heat susceptibility. However, reliable inheritance of mitochondria to newly formed conidia is ensured. Strikingly, mitochondrial fission mutants show a significant and growth condition‐dependent increase in azole resistance. Parallel disruption of fusion in a fission mutant partially rescues growth and sporulation defects and further increases the azole resistance phenotype. Taken together, our results indicate an emerging dispensability of the mitochondrial rhomboid protease function in mitochondrial fusion, the suitability of mitochondrial fusion machinery as antifungal target and the involvement of mitochondrial dynamics in azole susceptibility.     

Phospholipid Transport via Mitochondria

In eukaryotic cells, complex membrane structures called organelles are highly developed to exert specialized functions. Mitochondria are one of such organelles consisting of the outer and inner membranes (OM and IM) with characteristic protein and phospholipid compositions. Maintaining proper phospholipid compositions of the membranes is crucial for mitochondrial integrity, thereby contributing to normal cell activities. As cellular locations for phospholipid synthesis are restricted to specific compartments such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane and the mitochondrial inner membrane, newly synthesized phospholipids have to be transported and distributed properly from the ER or mitochondria to other cellular membranes. Although understanding of molecular mechanisms of phospholipid transport are much behind those of protein transport, recent studies using yeast as a model system began to provide intriguing insights into phospholipid exchange between the ER and mitochondria as well as between the mitochondrial OM and IM. In this review, we summarize the latest findings of phospholipid transport via mitochondria and discuss the implicated molecular mechanisms.      

Actin localization and function in higher plants

Summary Two different cytochemical methods were used to study the localization of uricase (EC 1.7.3.3) and catalase (EC 1.11.1.6) in developing root nodules of soybean (Glycine max) inoculated as seeds withBradyrhizobium japonicum. One of the methods employs DAB (3,3-diaminobenzidine) and detects uricase activity indirectly by coupling it to endogenous catalase activity. The other method utilizes cerium chloride to detect uricase activity directly. These methods were modified to obtain not only a strong staining reaction but also improved ultrastructural preservation. With the indirect DAB method, intense staining indicative of both uricase and catalase activity was obtained in the enlarged peroxisomes of older uninfected cells. Similar staining was observed in enlarging peroxisomes of younger uninfected cells, and in the material of associated sacs whose bounding membranes appear to arise as distensions of the ER. The observations are discussed in relation to the controversial role of the ER in peroxisome biogenesis. Although the small peroxisome-like organelles of infected cells did not give a clearly positive reaction in the indirect DAB method, they reacted positively in the cerium chloride method, and are considered to be peroxisomes.Abbreviations DAB 3,3-diaminobenzidine - ER endoplasmic reticulum     

Peroxisome Formation Requires the Endoplasmic Reticulum Channel Protein Sec61

In peroxisome formation, models of near‐autonomous peroxisome biogenesis with membrane protein integration directly from the cytosol into the peroxisomal membrane are in direct conflict with models whereby peroxisomes bud from the endoplasmic reticulum and receive their membrane proteins through a branch of the secretory pathway. We therefore reinvestigated the role of the Sec 61 complex, the protein‐conducting channel of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) in peroxisome formation. We found that depletion or partial inactivation of Sec 61 in yeast disables peroxisome formation. The ER entry of the early peroxisomal membrane protein Pex 3 engineered with a glycosylation tag is reduced in sec61 mutant cells. Moreover, we were able to reconstitute Pex 3 import into ER membranes in vitro, and we identified a variant of a signal anchor sequence for ER translocation at the Pex 3 N‐terminus. Our findings are consistent with a Sec 61 requirement for peroxisome formation and a fundamental role of the ER in peroxisome biogenesis.     

Ultrastructural specialization for ureide production in uninfected cells of soybean root nodules

Summary Ultrastructural studies were conducted on root nodules of soybean (Glycine max) inoculated as seeds withRhizobium japonicum. The development of the large peroxisomes and abundant tubular endoplasmic reticulum (ER) characteristic of the uninfected interstitial cells was followed during nodule growth and maturation. Quantitative data on differences between the uninfected and infected cells in volumes and numbers of peroxisomes, plastids and mitochondria were analyzed statistically. The peroxisomes are 60 times greater in volume per unit cytoplasm in the uninfected cells than the small presumptive peroxisomes in the infected cells. Plastids are about equal in volume in the two types of cells. Mitochondria have 4 × the volume and 3 × the number of profiles per unit cytoplasm in the infected cells than in the uninfected. The observations are discussed in relation to published evidence that several enzymes involved in ureide production are localized in organelles of the uninfected cells. The uninfected cells are viewed as essential components in the symbiotic relationship between host and bacterium.Abbreviations DAB 3,3-diaminobenzidine - ER endoplasmic reticulum     

Immuno‐ and Correlative Light Microscopy‐Electron Tomography Methods for 3D Protein Localization in Yeast

Compartmentalization of eukaryotic cells is created and maintained through membrane rearrangements that include membrane transport and organelle biogenesis. Three‐dimensional reconstructions with nanoscale resolution in combination with protein localization are essential for an accurate molecular dissection of these processes. The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a key model system for identifying genes and characterizing pathways essential for the organization of cellular ultrastructures. Electron microscopy studies of yeast, however, have been hampered by the presence of a cell wall that obstructs penetration of resins and cryoprotectants, and by the protein dense cytoplasm, which obscures the membrane details. Here we present an immuno‐electron tomography (IET) method, which allows the determination of protein distribution patterns on reconstructed organelles from yeast. In addition, we extend this IET approach into a correlative light microscopy‐electron tomography procedure where structures positive for a specific protein localized through a fluorescent signal are resolved in 3D. These new investigative tools for yeast will help to advance our understanding of the endomembrane system organization in eukaryotic cells.      

Subcellular localization of long-chain alcohol dehydrogenase and aldehyde dehydrogenase in n-alkane-grown Candida tropicalis

Long-chain alcohol dehydrogenase and longchain aldehyde dehydrogenase were induced in the cells of Candida tropicalis grown on n-alkanes. Subcellular localization of these dehydrogenases, together with that of acyl-CoA synthetase and glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase, was studied in terms of the metabolism of fatty acids derived from n-alkane substrates. Both longchain alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases distributed in the fractions of microsomes, mitochondria and peroxisomes obtained from the alkane-grown cells of C. tropicalis. Acyl-CoA synthetase was also located in these three fractions. Glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase was found in microsomes and mitochondria, in contrast to fatty acid -oxidation system localized exclusively in peroxisomes. Similar results of the enzyme localization were also obtained with C. lipolytica grown on n-alkanes. These results suggest strongly that microsomal and mitochondrial dehydrogenases provide long-chain fatty acids to be utilized for lipid synthesis, whereas those in peroxisomes supply fatty acids to be degraded via -oxidation to yield energy and cell constituents.     

The association of peroxisomes with the developing cell plate in dividing onion root cells depends on actin microfilaments and myosin

We have investigated changes in the distribution of peroxisomes through the cell cycle in onion (Allium cepa L.) root meristem cells with immunofluorescence and electron microscopy, and in leek (Allium porrum L.) epidermal cells with immunofluorescence and peroxisomal-targeted green fluorescent protein. During interphase and mitosis, peroxisomes distribute randomly throughout the cytoplasm, but beginning late in anaphase, they accumulate at the division plane. Initially, peroxisomes occur within the microtubule phragmoplast in two zones on either side of the developing cell plate. However, as the phragmoplast expands outwards to form an annulus, peroxisomes redistribute into a ring immediately inside the location of the microtubules. Peroxisome aggregation depends on actin microfilaments and myosin. Peroxisomes first accumulate in the division plane prior to the formation of the microtubule phragmoplast, and throughout cytokinesis, always co-localise with microfilaments. Microfilament-disrupting drugs (cytochalasin and latrunculin), and a putative inhibitor of myosin (2,3-butanedione monoxime), inhibit aggregation. We propose that aggregated peroxisomes function in the formation of the cell plate, either by regulating hydrogen peroxide production within the developing cell plate, or by their involvement in recycling of excess membranes from secretory vesicles via the -oxidation pathway. Differences in aggregation, a phenomenon which occurs in onion, some other monocots and to a lesser extent in tobacco BY-2 suspension cells, but which is not obvious in the roots of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., may reflect differences within the primary cell walls of these plants.Abbreviations BDM 2,3-butanedione monoxime - DAPI 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole - ER endoplasmic reticulum - GFP green fluorescent protein