Expression of A1 adenosine receptors in the developing avian retina: in vivo modulation by A2A receptors and endogenous adenosine

Little is known about the mechanisms that regulate the expression of adenosine receptors during CNS development. We demonstrate here that retinas from chick embryos injected in ovo with selective adenosine receptor ligands show changes in A1 receptor expression after 48 h. Exposure to A1 agonist N⁶‐cyclohexyladenosine (CHA) or antagonist 8‐Cyclopentyl‐1, 3‐dipropylxanthine (DPCPX) reduced or increased, respectively, A1 receptor protein and [³H]DPCPX binding, but together, CHA+DPCPX had no effect. Interestingly, treatment with A_2A agonist 3‐[4‐[2‐[[6‐amino‐9‐[(2R,3R,4S,5S)‐5‐(ethylcarbamoyl)‐3,4‐dihydroxy‐oxolan‐2‐yl]purin‐2‐yl]amino] ethyl]phenyl] propanoic acid (CGS21680) increased A1 receptor protein and [³H]DPCPX binding, and reduced A_2A receptors. The A_2A antagonists 7‐(2‐phenylethyl)‐5‐amino‐2‐(2‐furyl)‐pyrazolo‐[4,3‐e]‐1,2,4‐trizolo[1,5‐c] pyrimidine (SCH58261) and 4‐(2‐[7‐amino‐2‐[2‐furyl][1,2,4]triazolo[2,3‐a][1,3,5]triazo‐5‐yl‐amino]ethyl)phenol (ZM241385) had opposite effects on A1 receptor expression. Exposure to CGS21680 + CHA did not change A1 receptor levels, whereas CHA + ZM241385 or CGS21680 + DPCPX had no synergic effect. The blockade of adenosine transporter with S‐(4‐nitrobenzyl)‐6‐thioinosine (NBMPR) also reduced [³H]DPCPX binding, an effect blocked by DPCPX, but not enhanced by ZM241385. [³H]DPCPX binding kinetics showed that treatment with CHA reduced and CGS21680 increased the Bmax, but did not affect Kd values. CHA, DPCPX, CGS21680, and ZM241385 had no effect on A1 receptor mRNA. These data demonstrated an in vivo regulation of A1 receptor expression by endogenous adenosine or long‐term treatment with A1 and A_2A receptors modulators.     

New sensible method to quantize the intestinal absorption of receptor ligands

In recent years, special attention has been paid to the A₃ adenosine receptor (A₃AR) as a possible pharmacological target to treat intestinal inflammation. In this work, it was set up a novel method to quantify the concentration of a promising anti-inflammatory agent inside and outside of intestinal barrier using the everted gut sac technique. The compound chosen for the present study is one of the most potent and selective A₃AR agonist reported so far, named AR 170 (N⁶-methyl-2-phenylethynyl-5′-N-methylcarboxamidoadenosine). In order to evaluate the intestinal absorption of AR 170 the radioligand binding assay in comparison with HPLC-DAD was used. Results showed that the compound is absorbed via passive diffusion by paracellular pathway. The concentrations determined in the serosal (inside the sac) fluid by radioligand binding assay are in good agreement with those obtained through the widely used HPLC/MS protocol, demonstrating the reliability of the method. It is worthwhile to note that the radioligand binding assay allows detecting very low concentrations of analyte, thus offering an excellent tool to measure the intestinal absorption of receptor ligands. Moreover, the AR 170 quantity outside the gut sac and the interaction with A₃AR could presuppose good topical anti-inflammatory effects of this compound.     

Antagonist binding and induced conformational dynamics of GPCR A2A adenosine receptor

The A_2A adenosine receptor (A_2AAR) is a unique G‐protein coupled receptor (GPCR), because besides agonist, its antagonist could also lead to therapeutic relevance. Based on A_2AAR‐antagonist crystal structure, we have studied the binding mechanism of two distinct antagonists, ZM241385 and KW6002, and dynamic behaviors of A_2AAR induced by antagonist binding. Key residues interacting with both antagonists and residues specifically binding to one of them are identified. ZM241385 specifically bound to S67^2.65, M177^5.38, and N253^6.55, while KW6002 binds to F62^2.60, A81^3.29, and H264^7.29. Moreover, interactions with L167^5.28 are found for both antagonists, which were not reported in agonist binding. The dynamic behaviors of antagonist bound holo‐A_2AARs were found to be different from the apo‐A_2AAR in three typical functional switches, (i) the “ionic lock” was in equilibrium between formation and breakage in apo‐A_2AAR, but stayed broken in holo‐A_2AARs; (ii) the “rotamer toggle switch,” T88^3.36/F242^6.44/W246^6.48, adopted different rotameric conformations in apo‐A_2AAR and holo‐A_2AARs; (iii) apo‐A_2AAR preferred α‐helical intracellular loop (IC)2 and flexible IC3, while holo‐A_2AARs had a flexible IC2 and α‐helical IC3. Our results indicated that antagonist binding induced different conformational rearrangements of these characteristic functional switches in apo‐A_2AAR and holo‐A_2AARs. Proteins 2013; 81:1399–1410. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Role of Histidine Residues in Agonist and Antagonist Binding Sites of A1 Adenosine Receptor

Abstract: The influence of pH on the equilibrium dissociation constant and on kinetic association and dissociation constants was studied for adenosine receptor agonist L-N⁶-[adenine-2,8-³H, ethyl-2-³H]phenylisopropyladenosine ([³H]R-PIA) and antagonist 8-cyclopentyl-1,3-[³H]-dipropylxanthine ([³H]DPCPX). Two ionizable groups, of pK 7.0 and pK 7.4, are involved in the [³H]R-PIA associations with high- and low-affinity states of the receptor, and another group, of pK 6.0, is involved in the association with the low-affinity state. No ionizable group is involved in the dissociation process for the high-affinity state, whereas two ionizable groups, of pK 6.0 and 6.5, are involved in the low-affinity state. For [³H]DPCPX, three ionizable groups (pK 6.0, 7.4, and 8.0) are involved in the association process and only one group, (pK 6.0), is involved in the dissociation step. The apparent pK values obtained agree with histidine residues. We thus studied the effect of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEP), which reacts irreversibly with histidine residues, on agonist and antagonist binding to A₁ adenosine receptors from pig brain cortical membranes. DEP treatment of membrane reduced the affinity (K_D) and the total binding (R) of the agonist and the antagonist. Membrane preincubation with unlabeled ligand (R-PIA or DPCPX) prevented the effect of DEP modification observed when the same ligand, but with label, is added to the same membranes, but did not prevent the DEP modification on different, labeled ligand. The pattern of protective action of R-PIA, DPCPX, adenosine, and guanylylimidodiphosphate in DEP treatment and the displacement curves of radiolabeled agonist and antagonist by both unlabeled ligands indicated that the interaction site for agonist and antagonist binding is the same, although the complete mechanisms for recognition and binding differ.     

Pharmacophore mapping and in silico screening to identify new potent leads for A2A adenosine receptor as antagonists

A_2A adenosine receptor (AR) antagonists play an important role in neurodegenerative diseases like Parkinson’s disease. A 3D-QSAR study of A_2A AR antagonists, was taken up to design best pharmacophore model. The pharmacophoric features (ADHRR) containing a hydrogen bond acceptor (A), a hydrogen bond donor (D), a hydrophobic group (H) and two aromatic rings (R), is projected as the best predictive pharmacophore model. The QSAR model was further treated as a template for in silico search of databases to identify new scaffolds. The binding patterns of the leads with A_2A AR are analysed using docking studies and novel potent ligands of A_2A AR are projected.     

Enhanced A3 adenosine receptor selectivity of multivalent nucleoside-dendrimer conjugates

Background

An approach to use multivalent dendrimer carriers for delivery of nucleoside signaling molecules to their cell surface G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) was recently introduced.

Results

A known adenosine receptor (AR) agonist was conjugated to polyamidoamine (PAMAM) dendrimer carriers for delivery of the intact covalent conjugate to on the cell surface. Depending on the linking moiety, multivalent conjugates of the N ⁶-chain elongated functionalized congener ADAC (N ⁶-[4-[[[4-[[[(2-aminoethyl)amino]carbonyl]methyl]anilino]carbonyl]methyl]phenyl]-adenosine) achieved unanticipated high selectivity in binding to the cytoprotective human A₃ AR, a class A GPCR. The key to this selectivity of > 100-fold in both radioreceptor binding (K_{i app} = 2.4 nM) and functional assays (EC₅₀ = 1.6 nM in inhibition of adenylate cyclase) was maintaining a free amino group (secondary) in an amide-linked chain. Attachment of neutral amide-linked chains or thiourea-containing chains preserved the moderate affinity and efficacy at the A₁ AR subtype, but there was no selectivity for the A₃ AR. Since residual amino groups on dendrimers are associated with cytotoxicity, the unreacted terminal positions of this A₃ AR-selective G2.5 dendrimer were present as carboxylate groups, which had the further benefit of increasing water-solubility. The A₃ AR selective G2.5 dendrimer was also visualized binding the membrane of cells expressing the A₃ receptor but did not bind cells that did not express the receptor.

Conclusion

This is the first example showing that it is feasible to modulate and even enhance the pharmacological profile of a ligand of a GPCR based on conjugation to a nanocarrier and the precise structure of the linking group, which was designed to interact with distal extracellular regions of the 7 transmembrane-spanning receptor. This ligand tool can now be used in pharmacological models of tissue rescue from ischemia and to probe the existence of A₃ AR dimers.     

Analysis of Competition Binding Assays: Assessment of the Range of Validity of a Commonly Invoked Assumption

Abstract

A common assumption invoked in the analysis of competition binding assays is that the fractional saturation of sites with the unlabeled ligand is given by 1 - (the concentration of bound labeled ligand in the presence of unlabeled ligand)/(the concentration of bound labeled ligand in the absence of unlabeled ligand). This assumption is critically evaluated in the context of several binding models: (a) binding of univalent ligands to multiple classes of equivalent and independent sites, with and without nonspecific binding; (b) cooperative binding of univalent ligands; and (c) binding of multivalent ligands to a single class of univalent acceptors. We show that the conventional assumption is only valid when the labeled ligand is mainly in the free form, occupies a small fraction of the total sites and binds univalently to all sites in an equivalent and independent manner, and when the unlabeled ligand forms l : l complexes with the acceptor sites. When these conditions are satisfied, the conventional assumption is valid even if the unlabeled ligand binds to nonequivalent sites or exhibits cooperativity. Finally, we apply the theory derived for case (a) above to the binding of fluoresceinated epidermal growth factor to A431 cells and demonstrate that the analysis of data obtained from both conventional and competition assays provides information which is difficult, if not impossible, to obtain from either assay alone.     

Modulation of G protein-coupled adenosine receptors by strategically functionalized agonists and antagonists immobilized on gold nanoparticles

Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) allow the tuning of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties by active or passive targeting of drugs for cancer and other diseases. We have functionalized gold nanoparticles by tethering specific ligands, agonists and antagonists, of adenosine receptors (ARs) to the gold surface as models for cell surface interactions with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The AuNP conjugates with chain-extended AR ligands alone (PEGylated nucleosides and nonnucleosides, anchored to the Au via thioctic acid) were found to be insoluble in water due to hydrophobic entities in the ligand. Therefore, we added a second, biologically inactive pendant moiety to increase the water solubility, consisting of a PEGylated chain terminating in a carboxylic or phosphate group. The purity and stability of the immobilized biologically active ligand were examined by ultrafiltration and HPLC. Pharmacological receptor binding studies on these GPCR ligand-derivatized AuNPs (2–5 nm in diameter), performed using membranes of mammalian cells stably expressing human A₁, A_2A, and A₃ARs, showed that the desired selectivity was retained with K _i values (nanomolar) of A₃AR agonist 21b and A_2AAR antagonists 24 and 26a of 14 (A₃), 34 (A_2A), and 69 (A_2A), respectively. The corresponding monomers displayed K _i values of 37, 61, and 1,420 nM, respectively. In conclusion, we have synthesized stable, water-soluble AuNP derivatives of tethered A₃ and A_2AAR ligands that retain the biological properties of their monomeric ligands and are intended for therapeutic and imaging applications. This is the first prototypical application to gold carriers of small molecule (nonpeptide) GPCR ligands, which are under investigation for treatment of cancer and inflammatory diseases.     

Development of novel adenosine receptor ligands based on the 3-amidocoumarin scaffold

With the aim of finding new adenosine receptor (AR) ligands presenting the 3-amidocoumarin scaffold, a study focusing on the discovery of new chemical entities was carried out. The synthesized compounds 1–8 were evaluated in radioligand binding (A₁, A_2A and A₃) and adenylyl cyclase activity (A_2B) assays in order to determine their affinity for human AR subtypes. The 3-benzamide derivative 4 showed the highest affinity of the whole series and was more than 30-fold selective for the A₃ AR (K_i = 3.24 μM). The current study supported that small structural changes in this scaffold allowed modulating the affinity resulting in novel promising classes of A₁, A_2A, and/or A₃ AR ligands. We also performed docking calculations in hA_2A and hA₃ to identify the hypothetical binding mode for the most active compounds. In addition, some ADME properties were calculated in order to better understand the potential of these compounds as drug candidates.     

Selectivity is species-dependent: Characterization of standard agonists and antagonists at human,rat, and mouse adenosine receptors

Adenosine receptors (ARs) have emerged as new drug targets. The majority of data on affinity/potency and selectivity of AR ligands described in the literature has been obtained for the human species. However, preclinical studies are mostly performed in mouse or rat, and standard AR agonists and antagonists are frequently used for studies in rodents without knowing their selectivity in the investigated species. In the present study, we selected a set of frequently used standard AR ligands, 8 agonists and 16 antagonists, and investigated them in radioligand binding studies at all four AR subtypes, A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃, of three species, human, rat, and mouse. Recommended, selective agonists include CCPA (for A₁AR of rat and mouse), CGS-21680 (for A_2A AR of rat), and Cl-IB-MECA (for A₃AR of all three species). The functionally selective partial A_2B agonist BAY60-6583 was found to additionally bind to A₁ and A₃AR and act as an antagonist at both receptor subtypes. The antagonists PSB-36 (A₁), preladenant (A_2A), and PSB-603 (A_2B) displayed high selectivity in all three investigated species. MRS-1523 acts as a selective A₃AR antagonist in human and rat, but is only moderately selective in mouse. The comprehensive data presented herein provide a solid basis for selecting suitable AR ligands for biological studies.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s11302-015-9460-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Species differences and mechanism of action of A<Subscript>3</Subscript> adenosine receptor allosteric modulators

Activity of the A₃ adenosine receptor (AR) allosteric modulators LUF6000 (2-cyclohexyl-N-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1H-imidazo [4,5-c]quinolin-4-amine) and LUF6096 (N-{2-[(3,4-dichlorophenyl)amino]quinolin-4-yl}cyclohexanecarbox-amide) was compared at four A₃AR species homologs used in preclinical drug development. In guanosine 5′-[γ-[³⁵S]thio]triphosphate ([³⁵S]GTPγS) binding assays with cell membranes isolated from human embryonic kidney cells stably expressing recombinant A₃ARs, both modulators substantially enhanced agonist efficacy at human, dog, and rabbit A₃ARs but provided only weak activity at mouse A₃ARs. For human, dog, and rabbit, both modulators increased the maximal efficacy of the A₃AR agonist 2-chloro-N ⁶-(3-iodobenzyl)adenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide as well as adenosine > 2-fold, while slightly reducing potency in human and dog. Based on results from N ⁶-(4-amino-3-[¹²⁵I]iodobenzyl)adenosine-5′-N-methylcarboxamide ([¹²⁵I]I-AB-MECA) binding assays, we hypothesize that potency reduction is explained by an allosterically induced slowing in orthosteric ligand binding kinetics that reduces the rate of formation of ligand-receptor complexes. Mutation of four amino acid residues of the human A₃AR to the murine sequence identified the extracellular loop 1 (EL1) region as being important in selectively controlling the allosteric actions of LUF6096 on [¹²⁵I]I-AB-MECA binding kinetics. Homology modeling suggested interaction between species-variable EL1 and agonist-contacting EL2. These results indicate that A₃AR allostery is species-dependent and provide mechanistic insights into this therapeutically promising class of agents.     

Pharmacological characterization of DPTN and other selective A3 adenosine receptor antagonists

The A₃ adenosine receptor (AR) is emerging as an attractive drug target. Antagonists are proposed for the potential treatment of glaucoma and asthma. However, currently available A₃AR antagonists are potent in human and some large animals, but weak or inactive in mouse and rat. In this study, we re-synthesized a previously reported A₃AR antagonist, DPTN, and evaluated its affinity and selectivity at human, mouse, and rat ARs. We showed that DPTN, indeed, is a potent A₃AR antagonist for all three species tested, albeit a little less selective for mouse and rat A₃AR in comparison to the human A₃AR. DPTN’s K_i values at respective A₁, A_2A, A_2B, and A₃ receptors were (nM) 162, 121, 230, and 1.65 (human); 411, 830, 189, and 9.61 (mouse); and 333, 1147, 163, and 8.53 (rat). Its antagonist activity at both human and mouse A₃ARs was confirmed in a cyclic AMP functional assay. Considering controversial use of currently commercially available A₃AR antagonists in rats and mice, we also re-examined other commonly used and selective A₃AR antagonists under the same experimental conditions. The K_i values of MRS1523 were shown to be 43.9, 349, and 216 nM at human, mouse, and rat A₃ARs, respectively. MRS1191 and MRS1334 showed incomplete inhibition of [¹²⁵I]I-AB-MECA binding to mouse and rat A₃ARs, while potent human A₃AR antagonists, MRS1220, MRE3008F20, PSB10, PSB-11, and VUF5574 were largely inactive. Thus, we demonstrated that DPTN and MRS1523 are among the only validated A₃AR antagonists that can be possibly used (at an appropriate concentration) in mouse or rat to confirm an A₃AR-related mechanism or function.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11302-021-09823-5.     

Antiproliferative effects of selective adenosine receptor agonists and antagonists on human lymphocytes: evidence for receptor-independent mechanisms

The effects of standard adenosine receptor (AR) agonists and antagonists on the proliferation of human T lymphocytes, unstimulated and phytohemagglutinin-stimulated human peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL), and Jurkat T cells were investigated. Real-time PCR measurements confirmed the presence of all four AR subtypes on the investigated cells, although at different expression levels. A_2A ARs were predominantly expressed in PBL and further upregulated upon stimulation, while malignant Jurkat T cells showed high expression levels of A₁, A_2A, and A_2B ARs. Cell proliferation was measured by [³H]-thymidine incorporation assays. Several ligands, including the subtype-selective agonists CPA (A₁), BAY60-6583 (A_2B), and IB-MECA (A₃), and the antagonists PSB-36 (A₁), MSX-2 (A_2A), and PSB-10 (A₃) significantly inhibited cell proliferation at micromolar concentrations, which were about three orders of magnitude higher than their AR affinities. In contrast, further investigated AR ligands, including the agonists NECA (nonselective) and CGS21680 (A_2A), and the antagonists preladenant (SCH-420814, A_2A), PSB-1115 (A_2B), and PSB-603 (A_2B) showed no or only minor effects on lymphocyte proliferation. The anti-proliferative effects of the AR agonists could not be blocked by the corresponding antagonists. The non-selective AR antagonist caffeine stimulated phytohemagglutinin-activated PBL with an EC₅₀ value of 104 μM. This is the first study to compare a complete set of commonly used AR ligands for all subtypes on lymphocyte proliferation. Our results strongly suggest that these compounds induce an inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation and cell death through AR-independent mechanisms.     

Synthesis,biological evaluation and molecular modelling studies of 1,3,7,8-tetrasubstituted xanthines as potent and selective A2A AR ligands with in vivo efficacy against animal model of Parkinson’s disease

In the present study, an attempt has been made to develop a new series of 1,3,7,8-tetrasubstituted xanthine based potent and selective AR ligands for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Antagonistic interactions between dopamine and A_2A adenosine receptors serve as the basis for the development of AR antagonists as potential drug candidates for PD. All the synthesized compounds have been evaluated for their affinity toward AR subtypes using in vitro radioligand binding assays. 1,3-Dipropylxanthine 7a with a methyl substituent at N-7 position represents the most potent compound of the series and displayed highest affinity (A_2A, K_i = 0.108 µM), however incorporation of a propargyl group at 7-positon of the xanthine nucleus seems to be the most appropriate substitution to improve selectivity towards the A_2A subtype along with reasonable potency. Antiparkinsonian activity has been evaluated using perphenazine induced catatonia in rats. Most of the synthesized xanthines significantly lowered the catatonic score as compared to control and displayed antiparkinsonian effects comparable to standard drug. All the synthesized compounds were subjected to grid-based molecular docking studies to understand the key structural requirements for the development of new molecules well-endowed with intrinsic efficacy and selectivity as adenosine receptor ligands. In silico studies carried out on newly synthesized xanthines provided further support to the pharmacological results.     

GTP and IAP Shifts Adenosine A1-Agonist Binding in Smooth Muscle Membranes to the Low Affinity State,Similar to the one Found in Intact Cells

Abstract

Adenosine A₁ receptors in the smooth muscle cell line DDT₁ MF-2 were characterized by radioligand binding using the antagonist [³H]-8-cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine ([³H]DPCPX) as the ligand. Binding properties of adenosine agonists and antagonists to both intact cells and membranes were investigated.     

The importance of valine 114 in ligand binding in β2‐adrenergic receptor

G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are transmembrane signaling molecules, with a majority of them performing important physiological roles. β₂‐Adrenergic receptor (β₂‐AR) is a well‐studied GPCRs that mediates natural responses to the hormones adrenaline and noradrenaline. Analysis of the ligand‐binding region of β₂‐AR using the recently solved high‐resolution crystal structures revealed a number of highly conserved amino acids that might be involved in ligand binding. However, detailed structure‐function studies on some of these residues have not been performed, and their role in ligand binding remains to be elucidated. In this study, we have investigated the structural and functional role of a highly conserved residue valine 114, in hamster β₂‐AR by site‐directed mutagenesis. We replaced V114 in hamster β₂‐AR with a number of amino acid residues carrying different functional groups. In addition to the complementary substitutions V114I and V114L, the V114C and V114E mutants also showed significant ligand binding and agonist dependent G‐protein activation. However, the V114G, V114T, V114S, and V114W mutants failed to bind ligand in a specific manner. Molecular modeling studies were conducted to interpret these results in structural terms. We propose that the replacement of V114 influences not only the interaction of the ethanolamine side‐chains but also the aryl‐ring of the ligands tested. Results from this study show that the size and orientation of the hydrophobic residue at position V114 in β₂‐AR affect binding of both agonists and antagonists, but it does not influence the receptor expression or folding.     

Impaired A2A adenosine receptor/nitric oxide/VEGF signaling pathway in fetal endothelium during late- and early-onset preeclampsia

To investigate whether fetal endothelial cell proliferation and migration are modulated by the A_2A adenosine receptor (A_2AAR), nitric oxide (NO) and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling pathway, we isolated human umbilical vein endothelial cells from normal pregnancy (n?=?23), preterm delivery (n?=?4), and late-onset (LOPE, n?=?10) and early-onset preeclampsia (EOPE, n?=?8). We used the non-selective adenosine receptor agonist (NECA) and the selective agonist (CGS-21680) and/or selective antagonist (ZM-241385) for A_2AAR. Also, the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) inhibitor, l-NAME, was used in co-incubation with CGS-21680. Compared to normal pregnancy, EOPE exhibited low cell proliferation and migration associated with reduced expressions of A_2AAR and VEGF and NO synthesis (i.e., total and phosphorylated serine¹¹⁷⁷ endothelial NOS and nitrite formation). In contrast, LOPE exhibited the opposite behavior in all these markers compared to normal pregnancy or EOPE. Cell proliferation and migration were increased by CGS-21680 (or NECA) in all analyzed groups (EOPE>LOPE>normal pregnancy) compared to their respective basal conditions, an effect that was associated with high NO and VEGF synthesis and blocked by ZM-241385 with significantly different IC₅₀ for each group (EOPE>LOPE>normal pregnancy). The differences seem independent of gestational age. l-NAME blocked the CGS-21680-mediated cell proliferation and migration in normal pregnancy and LOPE (IC₅₀?=?36.2?±?2.5 and 8.6?±?2.2 nM, respectively) as well as the VEGF expression in normal pregnancy. Therefore, the A_2AAR/NO/VEGF signaling pathway exhibits a pro-angiogenic effect in normal pregnancies and LOPE, whereas impairment in this pathway seems related to the reduced angiogenic capacity of the fetal endothelium in EOPE.     

Tritium-labeled agonists as tools for studying adenosine A<Subscript>2B</Subscript> receptors

A selective agonist radioligand for A_2B adenosine receptors (A_2BARs) is currently not available. Such a tool would be useful for labeling the active conformation of the receptors. Therefore, we prepared BAY 60-6583, a potent and functionally selective A_2BAR (partial) agonist, in a tritium-labeled form. Despite extensive efforts, however, we have not been able to establish a radioligand binding assay using [³H]BAY 60-6583. This is probably due to its high non-specific binding and its moderate affinity, which had previously been overestimated based on functional data. As an alternative, we evaluated the non-selective A_2BAR agonist [³H]NECA for its potential to label A_2BARs. [³H]NECA showed specific, saturable, and reversible binding to membrane preparations of Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) or human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells stably expressing human, rat, or mouse A_2BARs. In competition binding experiments, the AR agonists 2-chloroadenosine (CADO) and NECA displayed significantly higher affinity when tested versus [³H]NECA than versus the A_2B-antagonist radioligand [³H]PSB-603 while structurally diverse AR antagonists showed the opposite effects. Although BAY 60-6583 is an A_2BAR agonist, it displayed higher affinity versus [³H]PSB-603 than versus [³H]NECA. These results indicate that nucleoside and non-nucleoside agonists are binding to very different conformations of the A_2BAR. In conclusion, [³H]NECA is currently the only useful radioligand for determining the affinity of ligands for an active A_2BAR conformation.     

Extended N6 substitution of rigid C2-arylethynyl nucleosides for exploring the role of extracellular loops in ligand recognition at the A3 adenosine receptor

2-Arylethynyl-(N)-methanocarba adenosine 5′-methyluronamides containing rigid N⁶-(trans-2-phenylcyclopropyl) and 2-phenylethynyl groups were synthesized as agonists for probing structural features of the A₃ adenosine receptor (AR). Radioligand binding confirmed A₃AR selectivity and N⁶-1S,2R stereoselectivity for one diastereomeric pair. The environment of receptor-bound, conformationally constrained N⁶ groups was explored by docking to an A₃AR homology model, indicating specific hydrophobic interactions with the second extracellular loop able to modulate the affinity profile. 2-Pyridylethynyl derivative 18 was administered orally in mice to reduce chronic neuropathic pain in the chronic constriction injury model.     

Synthesis and pharmacological characterization of novel xanthine carboxylate amides as A2A adenosine receptor ligands exhibiting bronchospasmolytic activity

The carboxylate amides of 8-phenyl-1,3-dimethylxanthine described herein represent a new series of selective ligands of the adenosine A_2A receptors exhibiting bronchospasmolytic activity. The effects of location of 8-phenyl substitutions on the adenosine receptor (AR) binding affinities of the newly synthesized xanthines have also been studied. The compounds displayed moderate to potent binding affinities toward various adenosine receptor subtypes when evaluated through radioligand binding studies. However, most of the compounds showed the maximum affinity for the A_2A subtype, some with high selectivity versus all other subtypes. Xanthine carboxylate amide 13b with a diethylaminoethylamino moiety at the para-position of the 8-phenylxanthine scaffold was identified as the most potent A_2A adenosine receptor ligand with K_i = 0.06 μM. Similarly potent and highly A_2A-selective are the isovanillin derivatives 16a and 16d. In addition, the newly synthesized xanthine derivatives showed good in vivo bronchospasmolytic activity when tested in guinea pigs.