Synaptic dysfunction,memory deficits and hippocampal atrophy due to ablation of mitochondrial fission in adult forebrain neurons

Well-balanced mitochondrial fission and fusion processes are essential for nervous system development. Loss of function of the main mitochondrial fission mediator, dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1), is lethal early during embryonic development or around birth, but the role of mitochondrial fission in adult neurons remains unclear. Here we show that inducible Drp1 ablation in neurons of the adult mouse forebrain results in progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations of mitochondrial morphology in the hippocampus that are marginally responsive to antioxidant treatment. Furthermore, DRP1 loss affects synaptic transmission and memory function. Although these changes culminate in hippocampal atrophy, they are not sufficient to cause neuronal cell death within 10 weeks of genetic Drp1 ablation. Collectively, our in vivo observations clarify the role of mitochondrial fission in neurons, demonstrating that Drp1 ablation in adult forebrain neurons compromises critical neuronal functions without causing overt neurodegeneration.In addition to their crucial importance in energy conversion, mitochondria serve many other housekeeping functions, including calcium buffering, amino-acid and steroid biosynthesis as well as fatty acids beta-oxidation and regulation of cell death. During the past decade, it has become increasingly clear that processes regulating mitochondrial morphology and ultrastructure are influenced by specific cellular requirements upon which mitochondria, in a precisely regulated manner, undergo fusion and division events.¹ Maintaining this balance is especially important for highly energy-consuming, polarized cells such as neurons, where single organellar units sprouting from the mitochondrial network are transported along the cytoskeleton into dendrites and spines to meet local energy requirements.² In addition, elaborate quality-control mechanisms also rely on mitochondrial dynamics: whereas defective organelles are sequestered by fission, enabling their removal from the mitochondrial network,^{3, 4} fusion supports qualitative homogeneity of the syncytium through complementation.⁵Mitochondrial fusion and fission are mediated by large GTPases of the dynamin superfamily.⁶ The outer mitochondrial membrane mitofusins 1 (MFN1) and 2 (MFN2) tether mitochondrial membranes by homodimer or heterodimer formation,⁷ thereby initiating fusion of the organelles, a process that also involves the inner mitochondrial membrane-associated GTPase Optic Atrophy 1.⁸ In addition, MFN2 also mediates contacts between mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum.⁹ The only known mammalian mitochondrial fission protein, Dynamin-Related Protein 1 (Drp1), translocates upon dephosphorylation by calcineurin¹⁰ to fission sites where it binds to mitochondrial fission factor.¹¹ Drp1 translocation is preceded by ER membranes wrapping around mitochondria to constrict the organelles,¹² thereby facilitating the formation of multimeric Drp1 complexes that, upon GTP hydrolysis, further tighten to complete the process of mitochondrial fission.¹³Genetic evidence in mice and humans indicates that mitochondrial dynamics are crucially important in neurons: in humans, a sporadic dominant-negative DRP1 mutation caused a lethal syndromic defect with abnormal brain development;¹⁴ similarly, constitutive Drp1 knockout in the mouse brain leads to lethal neurodevelopmental defects.^{15, 16} Although the crucial role of Drp1 during brain development is undisputed, studies on Drp1 function in postmitotic (adult) neurons are scarce; likewise, Drp1 ablation studies in primary cultures have so far failed to yield a conclusive picture. In vitro, Drp1 ablation is reported to lead to a super-elongated neuroprotective^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24} or an aggregated mitochondrial phenotype associated with neurodegeneration.^{15, 16, 25, 26, 27} These discrepancies are probably due to different experimental conditions: neuronal health is indeed influenced by the onset and duration of Drp1 inhibition, which varies considerably among the cited reports,²⁸ and different types of neuronal cultures studied display different sensitivity to Drp1 inhibition. In vivo, Drp1 ablation in Purkinje cells results in oxidative stress and neurodegeneration,²⁹ demonstrating that Drp1 is essential for postmitotic neurons'' health. In contrast, transient pharmacological Drp1 inhibition is neuroprotective in several mouse ischemia models, indicating that temporarily blocking mitochondrial fission holds therapeutic potential.^{30, 31, 32}To elucidate the consequences of blocked mitochondrial fission in the central nervous system in vivo, we bypassed the critical role of Drp1 during brain development by generating Drp1^flx/flx mice¹⁵ expressing tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase under the control of the CaMKIIα promoter.³³ Upon induced Drp1 deletion in postmitotic adult mouse forebrain neurons, mice develop progressive, neuronal subtype-specific alterations in mitochondrial shape and distribution in the absence of overt neurodegeneration. In addition, respiratory capacity, ATP content, synaptic reserve pool vesicle recruitment as well as spatial working memory are impaired, demonstrating that severely dysregulated mitochondrial dynamics can compromise critical neuronal functions in vivo without causing neuronal cell death.     

Muscle-specific Drp1 overexpression impairs skeletal muscle growth via translational attenuation

Mitochondrial fission and fusion are essential processes in the maintenance of the skeletal muscle function. The contribution of these processes to muscle development has not been properly investigated in vivo because of the early lethality of the models generated so far. To define the role of mitochondrial fission in muscle development and repair, we have generated a transgenic mouse line that overexpresses the fission-inducing protein Drp1 specifically in skeletal muscle. These mice displayed a drastic impairment in postnatal muscle growth, with reorganisation of the mitochondrial network and reduction of mtDNA quantity, without the deficiency of mitochondrial bioenergetics. Importantly we found that Drp1 overexpression activates the stress-induced PKR/eIF2α/Fgf21 pathway thus leading to an attenuated protein synthesis and downregulation of the growth hormone pathway. These results reveal for the first time how mitochondrial network dynamics influence muscle growth and shed light on aspects of muscle physiology relevant in human muscle pathologies.Skeletal muscle growth and mitochondrial metabolism are intimately linked. In myogenic precursor cells, mitochondrial mass, mtDNA copy number and mitochondrial respiration increase after the onset of myogenic differentiation;^{1, 2} furthermore, postnatal development of fast-twitch muscle is accompanied by an increase in mtDNA copy number³ and muscle regeneration is impaired when mitochondrial protein synthesis is inhibited with chloramphenicol.^{2, 4} These observations suggest that a change in the mitochondrial metabolism is necessary for proper muscle development. During myogenesis and postnatal development, the shape of mitochondria is also remodelled:^{3, 5, 6} in an elegant mouse model with fluorescent mitochondria it was shown that in young mice mitochondria of the extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle are shaped as elongated tubules oriented along the long axis of the muscle fibre, whereas in adult mice mitochondria are punctuated and organised into doublets.¹Mitochondrial network morphology is controlled by the balance between fusion and fission. In mammals, three large GTPases are involved in mitochondrial fusion: mitofusins 1 and 2 (Mfn1 and Mfn2) participate in the early steps of mitochondrial outer-membrane fusion, whereas the optic atrophy 1 protein (Opa1) is essential for inner-membrane fusion.⁷ Mitochondrial fission is mediated by the evolutionarily conserved dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1).⁸ In humans, mutations in Mfn2 and Opa1 cause two neurodegenerative diseases – Charcot–Marie–Tooth type 2 A and dominant optic atrophy, respectively – and a mutation in Drp1 has been linked to neonatal lethality with multisystem failure.^{9, 10, 11} Moreover, Drp1 expression was reported to increase in a model of cachexia¹² and to contribute to muscle insulin resistance in obese and type 2 diabetic mice.^{13, 14}The importance of mitochondrial dynamics in muscle physiology has become increasingly clear. In skeletal muscle, mitochondria undergo fusion to share matrix content in order to support excitation–contraction coupling.¹⁵ The mitochondrial network is remodelled in atrophic conditions, and denervation and expression of fission machinery in adult myofibres is sufficient to cause muscle wasting.¹⁶ Moreover, mice lacking Mfn1 and 2 in fast-twitch muscles exhibit drastic growth defects and muscle atrophy before dying at 6–8 weeks of age.³ Animal models in which mitochondrial fission proteins are manipulated during skeletal muscle development are not yet available, but in vitro data demonstrate that regulation of Drp1 is critical for myogenesis: myoblasts differentiation requires nitric oxide-dependent inhibition of Drp1⁶ and pharmacological inhibition of Drp1 activity impairs myogenic differentiation.¹⁷To explore in vivo the role of Drp1 and mitochondrial shape in the developing muscle, we generated a transgenic mouse line specifically overexpressing Drp1 in skeletal muscle during myogenesis. These mice display strong impairments in mitochondrial network shape and in muscle growth. We show that the mechanism responsible for the growth defect involves inhibition of protein synthesis and activation of the Atf4 pathway.     

The LRRK2 inhibitor GSK2578215A induces protective autophagy in SH-SY5Y cells: involvement of Drp-1-mediated mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial-derived ROS signaling

Mutations in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene have been associated with Parkinson''s disease, and its inhibition opens potential new therapeutic options. Among the drug inhibitors of both wild-type and mutant LRRK2 forms is the 2-arylmethyloxy-5-subtitutent-N-arylbenzamide GSK257815A. Using the well-established dopaminergic cell culture model SH-SY5Y, we have investigated the effects of GSK2578215A on crucial neurodegenerative features such as mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy. GSK2578215A induces mitochondrial fragmentation of an early step preceding autophagy. This increase in autophagosome results from inhibition of fusion rather than increases in synthesis. The observed effects were shared with LRRK2-IN-1, a well-described, structurally distinct kinase inhibitor compound or when knocking down LRRK2 expression using siRNA. Studies using the drug mitochondrial division inhibitor 1 indicated that translocation of the dynamin-related protein-1 has a relevant role in this process. In addition, autophagic inhibitors revealed the participation of autophagy as a cytoprotective response by removing damaged mitochondria. GSK2578215A induced oxidative stress as evidenced by the accumulation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal in SH-SY5Y cells. The mitochondrial-targeted reactive oxygen species scavenger MitoQ positioned these species as second messengers between mitochondrial morphologic alterations and autophagy. Altogether, our results demonstrated the relevance of LRRK2 in mitochondrial-activated pathways mediating in autophagy and cell fate, crucial features in neurodegenerative diseases.Nowadays, Parkinson''s disease (PD) constitutes the main motor disorder and the second neurodegenerative disease after Alzheimer''s disease. Etiology of PD remains unknown, but both environmental and genetic factors have been implicated. Among the genes associated with PD is the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2, PARK8, OMIM 607060) encoding gene encoded by PARK8. Indeed, LRRK2 mutations have been described in a substantial number of idiopathic late-onset PD patients without a known family history of the disease.^{1, 2, 3}The physiologic function remains unknown. It localizes in the cytosol as well as in specific membrane subdomains, including mitochondria, autophagosomes and autolysosomes,⁴ and interacts with a whole array of proteins, including both α- and β-tubulin,^{5, 6} tau,⁷ α-synuclein⁸ and F-actin.⁹ LRRK2 gene mutations, including the most common G2019S,³ are associated with increases in toxic putative kinase activity.^{1, 10} LRRK2 overexpression is toxic to cultured cells,^{11, 12} and LRRK2 loss did not cause neurodegenerative changes (for a review see Tong and Shen¹³). However, LRRK2 transgenic mice lack obvious PD-like behavioral phenotypes.¹⁴ LRRK2-associated PD patients show degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra.¹⁵ Data from our own group and others have associated mitochondrial apoptotical pathways with PD,^{16, 17, 18} and, in this context, LRRK2 mutant-mediated toxicity could be due to mitochondria-dependent apoptosis.¹⁹ There is considerable evidence for impaired mitochondrial function and morphology in both early-onset, autosomal recessive inherited PD and late-onset sporadic PD.Mitochondrial dynamics include several mechanisms, such as fission, fusion and mitophagy.^{20, 21} Altered fission/fusion dynamics might be a common pathogenic pathway of neurodegenerative diseases. It is well documented that mitochondrial dynamics constitute a relevant issue in some experimental neurodegenerative models.^{20, 22, 23, 24, 25} Mitochondrial dynamics is tightly regulated by cellular pathways including those participated by the dynamin-related protein-1 (Drp1). Drp1 mostly locates in the cytoplasm, but is stimulated after fission stimuli to migrate to the mitochondria. Once there, Drp1 forms ring-like structures, which wrap around the scission site to constrict the mitochondrial membrane resulting in mitochondrial fission.^{26, 27} Interestingly, a functional interaction between PD-associated LRRK2 and members of the dynamin GTPase superfamily has been described.²⁸Macroautophagy (hereafter referred to as autophagy) is an active cellular response, which functions in the intracellular degradation system of cellular debris such as damaged organelles. Whether autophagy promotes cell death or enhances survival is still controversial.^{29, 30} It requires the formation of autophagosomes where cellular content is to be degraded by the action of lysosomal enzymatic content. Autophagosome formation is regulated by an orderly action of >30 autophagy-related (Atg) proteins. Among them is the microtubule-associated protein 1A/1B-light chain 3 (LC3), a homolog of Apg8p, which is essential for autophagy in yeast and is associated with autophagosome membranes.³¹ Interestingly, these vesicles are mostly highly mobile in the cytoplasm.³² Wild-type and mutant LRRK2 expression has been related to autophagy.^{4, 33, 34, 35, 36} Reactive oxygen species (ROS) function as relevant second messengers after several stimuli, including mitochondrial disruption. Exacerbated ROS increases might result in overactivation of antioxidant systems and yield harmful oxidative stress. Among oxidative stress hallmarks is the accumulation of α,β-unsaturated hydroxyalkenal 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), whose accumulation has been reported in PD post-mortem patient brains,^{37, 38} thus giving a significant relevance to ROS in the pathogenesis of PD.All these results indicate LRRK2 as a promising pharmacologic target in PD treatment.³⁹ Several LRRK2 inhibitor drugs have been synthetized, such as the potent and highly selective 2-arylmethyloxy-5-substitutent-N-arylbenzamide (GSK2578215A). GSK2578215A exhibits biochemical IC₅₀s of 10.9 nM against wild-type LRRK2, and possesses a high ratio of brain to plasma distribution.⁴⁰ This study provides key insights into the mechanisms downstream of LRRK2 inhibition, and spreads light onto an underexplored, yet potentially tractable therapeutic target for treating LRRK2-associated PD. We demonstrate how inhibition of this kinase results in the activation of cellular death pathways such as the mitochondrial fission machinery, and how cells reply by activating a protective autophagic response. Our results show the presence of oxidative stress hallmarks, thus pointing to a key function for ROS, placed downstream of mitochondrial fission.     

Acute focal brain damage alters mitochondrial dynamics and autophagy in axotomized neurons

Mitochondria are key organelles for the maintenance of life and death of the cell, and their morphology is controlled by continual and balanced fission and fusion dynamics. A balance between these events is mandatory for normal mitochondrial and neuronal function, and emerging evidence indicates that mitochondria undergo extensive fission at an early stage during programmed cell death in several neurodegenerative diseases. A pathway for selective degradation of damaged mitochondria by autophagy, known as mitophagy, has been described, and is of particular importance to sustain neuronal viability. In the present work, we analyzed the effect of autophagy stimulation on mitochondrial function and dynamics in a model of remote degeneration after focal cerebellar lesion. We provided evidence that lesion of a cerebellar hemisphere causes mitochondria depolarization in axotomized precerebellar neurons associated with PTEN-induced putative kinase 1 accumulation and Parkin translocation to mitochondria, block of mitochondrial fusion by Mfn1 degradation, increase of calcineurin activity and dynamin-related protein 1 translocation to mitochondria, and consequent mitochondrial fission. Here we suggest that the observed neuroprotective effect of rapamycin is the result of a dual role: (1) stimulation of autophagy leading to damaged mitochondria removal and (2) enhancement of mitochondria fission to allow their elimination by mitophagy. The involvement of mitochondrial dynamics and mitophagy in brain injury, especially in the context of remote degeneration after acute focal brain damage, has not yet been investigated, and these findings may offer new target for therapeutic intervention to improve functional outcomes following acute brain damage.Mitochondria are essential organelles for cell function and viability, and are central to several processes such as energy production, metabolism, calcium buffering, and life/death decisions.¹ Neurons have a high and constant demand for mitochondrial metabolism, to maintain their functions, and contain many mitochondria throughout the cytoplasm, distributed to axons, presynaptic terminals, and dendritic shafts. Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles that continuously move and change shape. Their morphology is governed by the dynamic equilibrium between fusion and fission processes, both of which are mediated by evolutionarily conserved members of the dynamin family of large GTPases.² Fusion between the outer mitochondrial membranes (OMMs) is mediated by membrane-anchored mitofusins (Mfn1 and Mfn2), whereas that between inner mitochondrial membranes is controlled by optic atrophy 1.³ Mitochondrial fission is regulated by dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1) and fission protein 1 (Fis1).⁴ Drp1 is predominantly expressed in the cytoplasm and is recruited to mitochondria, where it associates with Fis1 to form a complex that constricts the inner and outer membranes, allowing mitochondria to divide.^{5, 6}Mitochondrial dynamics are crucial to the maintenance of mitochondrial function and neuron survival, as evidenced by findings that pathological imbalances between fusion and fission events develop in many neurodegenerative disorders and brain trauma.^{7, 8} Moreover, mitochondrial fission regulates organelle shape and mediates mitochondria-dependent cell death.⁹ The release of proapoptotic factors, such as cytochrome c (with consequent formation of the apoptosome and caspase activation), from depolarized mitochondria into the cytosol is a significant event in the induction of apoptosis and is associated with Drp1-mediated fragmentation of the mitochondrial network.¹⁰The elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria is therefore a key process with regard to the viability of neurons (and other cell types). Damaged mitochondria that accelerate cell death are removed through autophagy, an evolutionarily conserved lysosome-mediated degradation pathway that maintains the balance between organelle biogenesis, protein synthesis, and degradation of cellular components.¹¹Mitochondria can be selectively degraded by autophagy – a pathway known as mitophagy.¹² Priming of damaged mitochondria can involve several mechanisms, one of which is triggered by Parkin, a cytosolic E3 ubiquitin ligase that is mutated in familial forms of Parkinson''s disease (PD).¹³ Parkin recruitment to impaired mitochondria requires the kinase activity of PINK1 (PTEN-induced putative kinase 1),^{14, 15, 16} a serine/threonine kinase that is also mutated in other autosomal recessive forms of PD.¹⁷ PINK1 levels are very low in polarized mitochondria, to prevent mitophagy of healthy mitochondria; in contrast, when mitochondria are depolarized, full-length PINK1 accumulates rapidly at damaged organelles, crossing the OMM and acting as cellular sensors of damaged mitochondria.¹⁵ PINK1 then recruits Parkin to the mitochondrial surface, where it ubiquitinates several OMM proteins, which in turn recruit other proteins to initiate mitophagy.¹⁸ Mfn1 is a direct substrate of Parkin and its degradation has been suggested to prevent the fusion of damaged and healthy mitochondria.¹⁹ Drp1-dependent fission of mitochondria is also a crucial event that effects their degradation through mitophagy and the inhibition of fission specifically prevents mitochondrial autophagy.²⁰In this study, we examined mitochondrial function and its relationship with autophagy machinery in an in vivo model of acute focal CNS (central nervous system) lesion, focusing on remote changes that are induced by hemicerebellectomy (HCb). Unilateral HCb is a suitable model in which axonal damage-induced neuronal death mechanisms can be studied.^{21, 22} In this model, neuronal degeneration is caused by target deprivation and axonal damage of contralateral precerebellar nuclei of the inferior olive and pontine nuclei. Remote damage is a multifactorial phenomenon in which many components become active in specific time frames²¹ and is significant in determining the overall clinical outcome in many CNS pathologies, including spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury.^{23, 24, 25}Recently, we demonstrated that autophagy is activated in axotomized neurons after HCb, subsequent to cytochrome c release from mitochondria.²⁶ Further, rapamycin-enhanced autophagy has neuroprotective effects, reducing neuronal death and improving functional recovery. In this study, we examined mitochondrial dynamics and function in axotomized neurons after HCb in mice and analysed the effects of rapamycin on selective elimination of damaged mitochondria.     

miR-361-regulated prohibitin inhibits mitochondrial fission and apoptosis and protects heart from ischemia injury

Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Emerging evidences suggest that the abnormal mitochondrial fission participates in pathogenesis of cardiac diseases, including myocardial infarction (MI) and heart failure. However, the molecular components regulating mitochondrial network in the heart remain largely unidentified. Here we report that miR-361 and prohibitin 1 (PHB1) constitute an axis that regulates mitochondrial fission and apoptosis. The results show that PHB1 attenuates mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in response to hydrogen peroxide treatment in cardiomyocytes. Cardiac-specific PHB1 transgenic mice show reduced mitochondrial fission and myocardial infarction sizes after myocardial infarction surgery. MiR-361 is responsible for the dysfunction of PHB1 and suppresses the translation of PHB1. Knockdown of miR-361 reduces mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in vivo and in vitro. MiR-361 cardiac-specific transgenic mice represent elevated mitochondrial fission and myocardial infarction sizes upon myocardial ischemia injury. This study identifies a novel signaling pathway composed of miR-361 and PHB1 that regulates mitochondrial fission program and apoptosis. This discovery will shed new light on the therapy of myocardial infarction and heart failure.The heart drives the blood flow in the body and it has a large requirement of energy. Mitochondria meet the high energy demand of the heart by consistently providing large amounts of ATP through oxidative phosphorylation. Thus, mitochondrial malfunction is tightly related to cardiac diseases and contributes to cardiomyocyte injury, cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Mitochondria morphology is also associated with the function. Mitochondria constantly undergo fission and fusion. Fission leads to the formation of small round mitochondria and promotes cell apoptosis,^{1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} whereas fusion results in mitochondria elongation and have a protective role in cardiomyocytes maintenance.⁸ The above findings strongly suggest that mitochondrial fission and fusion machinery is important for cardiac function. In addition, unveiling the mechanism of mitochondrial network regulation will provide a novel therapeutic strategy for heart failure.The mitochondrial prohibitin complex is a macromolecular structure at the inner mitochondrial membrane that is composed of prohibitin 1 (PHB1) and prohibitin 2 subunits.⁹ These two proteins comprise an evolutionary conserved and ubiquitously expressed family of membrane proteins and are implicated in several important cellular processes such as mitochondrial biogenesis and function, cell proliferation, replicative senescence, and cell death.^{10, 11} The first mammalian PHB1 was identified as a potential tumor suppressor with anti-proliferative activity.¹² Recent findings suggest that PHB1 has an important role in regulating mitochondrial morphology. Loss of PHB1 results in accumulation of fragmented mitochondria in MEFs and HeLa cells.^{13, 14} However, it is not yet clear whether PHB1 participates in the regulation of mitochondrial dynamics in cardiomyocytes.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of short single-stranded non-coding endogenous RNAs and act as negative regulators of gene expression by inhibiting mRNA translation or promoting mRNA degradation.^{15, 16} Although the function of miRNAs has been widely studied in apoptosis, development, differentiation and proliferation, few works have been focused on miRNAs in the mitochondrial network regulation. It has been reported that miR-30b targets to p53 and inhibits mitochondrial fission.¹⁷ In addition, other miRNAs also affect the function of mitochondria by targeting to mitochondrial calcium uniporter.¹⁸ The study of miRNA function in mitochondria may shed new light on the machinery that underlies mitochondrial regulation.This study unveils that PHB1 is involved in the regulation of mitochondrial network in cardiomyocytes. PHB1 inhibits mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. In addition, PHB1 transgenic mice exhibit a reduced myocardial infarction sizes upon myocardial ischemia injury in vivo. In searching for the mechanism by which PHB1 is downregulated under pathologic condition, we identify miR-361 participates in the suppression of PHB1 translation. MiR-361 initiates mitochondrial fission, apoptosis and myocardial infarction through downregulating PHB1. Our results reveal a novel mitochondrial regulating model, which is composed of miR-361 and PHB1. Modulation of their levels may represent a novel approach for interventional treatment of myocardial infarction and heart failure.     

Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect against Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death

Evidence indicates that nitrosative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction participate in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Amyloid beta (Aβ) and peroxynitrite induce mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death by abnormal activation of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), a large GTPase that regulates mitochondrial fission. The exact mechanisms of mitochondrial fragmentation and DRP1 overactivation in AD remain unknown; however, DRP1 serine 616 (S616) phosphorylation is likely involved. Although it is clear that nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a role in AD, effective antioxidant therapies are lacking. Cerium oxide nanoparticles, or nanoceria, switch between their Ce³⁺ and Ce⁴⁺ states and are able to scavenge superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite. Therefore, nanoceria might protect against neurodegeneration. Here we report that nanoceria are internalized by neurons and accumulate at the mitochondrial outer membrane and plasma membrane. Furthermore, nanoceria reduce levels of reactive nitrogen species and protein tyrosine nitration in neurons exposed to peroxynitrite. Importantly, nanoceria reduce endogenous peroxynitrite and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation, DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation and neuronal cell death.Nitric oxide (NO) is a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator required for learning and memory.¹ NO is generated by NO synthases, a group of enzymes that produce NO from L-arginine. In addition to its normal role in physiology, NO is implicated in pathophysiology. When overproduced, NO combines with superoxide anions (O₂·⁻), byproducts of aerobic metabolism and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, to form peroxynitrite anions (ONOO⁻) that are highly reactive and neurotoxic. Accumulation of these reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), known as oxidative and nitrosative stress, respectively, is a common feature of aging, neurodegeneration and Alzheimer''s disease (AD).¹Nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a critical role in the etiology and pathogenesis of AD.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Peroxynitrite is implicated in the formation of the two hallmarks of AD, Aβ aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated Tau protein.^{1, 4, 7} In addition, peroxynitrite promotes the nitrotyrosination of presenilin 1, the catalytic subunit of the γ-secretase complex, which shifts production of Aβ to amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and increases the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, ultimately resulting in an increased propensity for aggregation and neurotoxicity.⁵ Furthermore, nitration of Aβ tyrosine 10 enhances its aggregation.⁶ Peroxynitrite can also modify enzymes, such as triosephosphate isomerase,⁴ and activate kinases, including Jun amino-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, which enhance neuronal cell death.^{8, 9} Moreover, peroxynitrite can trigger the release of free metals such as Zn²⁺ from intracellular stores with consequent inhibition of mitochondrial function and enhancement of neuronal cell death.^{10, 11, 12} Finally, peroxynitrite can irreversibly inhibit complexes I and IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.^{11, 13}Because mitochondria have a critical role in neurons as energy producers to fuel vital processes such as synaptic transmission and axonal transport,¹⁴ and mitochondrial dysfunction is a well-documented and early event in AD,¹⁵ it is important to consider how peroxynitrite and nitrosative stress affect mitochondria. Although the ultimate cause of mitochondrial dysfunction in AD remains unclear, an imbalance in mitochondrial fission and fusion is one possibility.^{1, 14, 16, 17, 18} Notably, peroxynitrite, N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation and Aβ can induce mitochondrial fragmentation by activating mitochondrial fission and/or inhibiting fusion.¹⁶ Mitochondrial fission and fusion is regulated by large GTPases of the dynamin family, including dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) that is required for mitochondrial division,¹⁹ and inhibition of mitochondrial division by overexpression of the GTPase-defective DRP1^K38A mutant provides protection against peroxynitrite-, NMDA- and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.¹⁶The exact mechanism of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation remains unclear. A recent report suggested that S-nitrosylation of DRP1 at cysteine 644 increases DRP1 activity and is the cause of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation in AD;²⁰ however, the work remains controversial, suggesting that alternative pathways might be involved.²¹ For example, peroxynitrite also causes rapid DRP1 S616 phosphorylation that promotes its translocation to mitochondria and organelle division.^{21, 22} In mitotic cells, DRP1 S616 phosphorylation is mediated by Cdk1/cyclinB1 and synchronizes mitochondrial division with cell division.²³ Interestingly, DRP1 is S616 hyperphosphorylated in AD brains, suggesting that this event might contribute to mitochondrial fragmentation in the disease.^{21, 22} A recent report indicates that Cdk5/p35 is responsible for DRP1 S616 phosphorylation,²⁴ and notably aberrant Cdk5/p35/p25 signaling is associated with AD pathogenesis.²⁵ Thus, we explored here the possible role of DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation in Aβ- and peroxynitrite-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation.Under normal conditions, accumulated mitochondrial superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) can be neutralized by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. Nitrosative stress in aging and AD might be explained by a loss of antioxidant enzymes. Previous studies suggest that expression of SOD subtypes is decreased in the human AD brain.^{26, 27} Furthermore, SOD1 deletion in a mouse model of AD increased the burden of amyloid plaques.²⁶ By contrast, overexpression of SOD2 in a mouse model of AD decreased the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and alleviated memory deficits.^{28, 29} There is currently a lack of antioxidants that can effectively quench superoxide anions, H₂O₂ or peroxynitrite and provide lasting effects. Cerium is a rare earth element and cerium oxide (CeO₂) nanoparticles, or nanoceria, shuttle between their 3+ or 4+ states. Oxidation of Ce⁴⁺ to Ce³⁺ causes oxygen vacancies and defects on the surface of the crystalline lattice structure of the nanoparticles, generating a cage for redox reactions to occur.³⁰ Accordingly, nanoceria mimic the catalytic activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD^{31, 32} and catalase,³³ and are able to neutralize peroxynitrite.³⁴ Because of these antioxidant properties, we hypothesized that nanoceria could detoxify peroxynitrite and protect against Aβ-induced DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation, mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.     

Chaperone-like protein p32 regulates ULK1 stability and autophagy

Mitophagy mediates clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria, and represents one type of mitochondrial quality control, which is essential for optimal mitochondrial bioenergetics. p32, a chaperone-like protein, is crucial for maintaining mitochondrial membrane potential and oxidative phosphorylation. However, the relationship between p32 and mitochondrial homeostasis has not been addressed. Here, we identified p32 as a key regulator of ULK1 stability by forming complex with ULK1. p32 depletion potentiated K48-linked but impaired K63-linked polyubiquitination of ULK1, leading to proteasome-mediated degradation of ULK1. As a result, silencing p32 profoundly impaired starvation-induced autophagic flux and the clearance of damaged mitochondria caused by mitochondrial uncoupler. Importantly, restoring ULK1 expression in p32-depleted cells rescued autophagy and mitophagy defects. Our findings highlight a cytoprotective role of p32 under starvation conditions by regulating ULK1 stability, and uncover a crucial role of the p32–ULK1-autophagy axis in coordinating stress response, cell survival and mitochondrial homeostasis.Mitophagy is a selective form of autophagy by which mitochondria are degraded in autolysosomes. p32 is a critical regulator of mitochondrial bioenergetics.¹ It primarily localizes to the mitochondrial matrix, but has also been reported to be present in other subcellular locations.^{2, 3, 4, 5} Many human tumors exhibit higher p32 expression levels than their nonmalignant counterpart tissues.^{6, 7, 8, 9} Depleting p32 in human cancer cells strongly shifts their metabolism from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis.¹ Consistently, p32 knockout causes mid-gestation lethality of knockout embryos and defects in oxidative phosphorylation. Mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) generated from p32 knockout embryos exhibited impaired ATP production and reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, which is in agreement with the observation that p32 silencing leads to increased mitochondrial fragmentation.^{10, 11} Notably, p32 was found to form protein complex with a variety of molecules^{7, 12, 13} and has been suggested that it may act as a multifunctional chaperone protein.^{12, 13, 14}ULK1 has a crucial role in mitophagy induction.¹⁵ Despite the pivotal role of ULK1 in mitochondrial clearance, little is known as how ULK1 itself is regulated. ULK1 is a relatively stable protein and is subject to proteasome-mediated degradation. Post-translational modifications including K63-linked ubiquitylation^{16, 17} and phosphorylation^{18, 19, 20} have been reported to modulate the rates of ULK1 turnover and kinase activity in different cellular contexts. Hsp90 and Cdc37 have been shown to regulate ULK1 stability and activity by forming complex with ULK1, which subsequently influences Atg13-mediated mitophagy.²¹ Here, we found p32 regulates ULK1 stability by forming protein complex with ULK1. The interaction between ULK1 and p32 is crucial for maintaining the steady-state levels and activity of ULK1. We further show that p32 ablation results in a defect in autophagy in EBSS-starved cells, and impairs clearance of dysfunctional mitochondria in cells exposed to mitochondrial uncoupler. Importantly, these autophagy and mitophagy defects can be restored by re-introducing ULK1 into p32-deficient cells, demonstrating ULK1 functions as a crucial downstream effector of p32.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.     

MicroRNA-532-3p regulates mitochondrial fission through targeting apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain in doxorubicin cardiotoxicity

Doxorubicin (DOX) is a wide-spectrum antitumor drug, but its clinical application is limited by its cardiotoxicity. However, the mechanisms underlying DOX-induced cardiomyopathy remain mostly unclear. Here we observed that apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain (ARC) was downregulated in mouse heart and cardiomyocytes upon DOX treatment. Furthermore, enforced expression of ARC attenuated DOX-induced cardiomyocyte mitochondrial fission and apoptosis. ARC transgenic mice demonstrated reduced cardiotoxicity upon DOX administration. DOX-induced mitochondrial fission required the activity of dynamin-related protein 1 (Drp1). In elucidating the molecular mechanism by which ARC was downregulated upon DOX treatment, miR-532-3p was found to directly target ARC and participated in DOX-induced mitochondrial fission and apoptosis. MiR-532-3p was not involved in DOX-induced apoptosis in cancer cells. Taken together, these findings provide novel evidence that miR-532-3p and ARC constitute an antiapoptotic pathway that regulates DOX cardiotoxicity. Therefore, the development of new therapeutic strategies based on ARC and miR-532-3p is promising for overcoming the cardiotoxicity of chemotherapy for cancer therapy.Doxorubicin (DOX) is one of the most widely used anticancer drugs. A large number of patients treated with DOX develop carditoxicity, which can lead to congestive heart failure.^{1, 2} The exact mechanisms of DOX cardiotoxicity remain unclear. Multiple mechanisms by which DOX-induced irreversible myocaridial injures have been proposed, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, lipid peroxidation, mitochondrial impairment, intracellular calcium dysregulation and direct suppression of heart-special gene expression.^{3, 4, 5} Most of these mechanisms ultimately result in the activation of apoptotic signaling, leading to progressive loss of cardiac myocytes.² Considering the limited capacity for proliferation, it is essential to understand the molecular signaling underlying DOX-induced cardiomyocyte death in order to establish interventions that can effectively prevent cardiac cell loss and, thereby, preserve cardiac function.The heart has evolutionarily developed a highly expressed antiapoptotic protein, apoptosis repressor with caspase recruitment domain (ARC).⁶ ARC was initially discovered as an endogenous apoptosis inhibitor in postmitotic cells, such as cardiomyocytes, skeletal muscle cells and neurons. It can antagonize both intrinsic and extrinsic apoptosis signaling pathways.^{6, 7, 8} ARC has a role in maintaining physiological cardiac function. Under pathological conditions, ARC is downregulated, which may contribute to the occurrence of many heart diseases, such as hypertrophy, heart failure and cardiac infraction.^{9, 10} ARC-deficient mice exerted significantly accelerated cardiomyopathy under conditions of cardiac ischemia or pressure overload.¹¹ Our previous work showed heart of cardiac-special ARC transgenic mice were more resistant to ischemia injury and hypertrophic stimuli.¹² As for DOX cardiotoxicity, it was reported that ARC was downregulated in cardiomyocytes exposed to DOX and led to a significant induction of apoptosis.⁵ Enforced expression of ARC dramatically increased the resistance of cardiomyocytes to undergo apoptotic cell death following DOX administration.⁵ But the mechanism by which ARC was downregulated during this process is largely unknown. Our previous work has also proved that highly expressed ARC contributed to cancer cell resistance to chemotherapy by targeting the mitochondrial fission machinery.¹³ However, whether ARC inhibits mitochondrial fission in cardiomyocytes upon DOX treatment remains to be investigated.MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a class of small non-coding RNAs and negative regulators of target genes by altering mRNA translation or stability.¹⁴ MiRNAs functionally participated in a wide variety of physiological or pathological processes.¹⁵ MiRNAs can regulate cardiac function such as the conductance of electrical signal, heart muscle contraction, heart growth and morphogenesis.¹⁶ Manipulation of miRNA can be developed to therapeutic approaches. However, it is not yet clear whether miRNAs are involved in the regulation of DOX cardiotoxicity. In our previous study, we have demonstrated that miR-185 negatively regulated ARC in gastric cancer cells.¹⁷ However, whether miRNAs can regulate ARC in DOX cardiotoxicity is unknown.In this study, we focused on the function of ARC in DOX cardiotoxicity both in cardiomyocytes and mice hearts. We found that ARC was downregulated in cardiomyocytes administered DOX. Enforced expression of ARC inhibited DOX-induced mitochondrial fission and apoptosis in cardiomyocytes. Heart-special ARC transgenic mice exhibited reduced cardiotoxicity. Besides, miR-532-3p could sensitize cardiomyocytes to DOX-induced mitochondrial fission and apoptosis through negatively regulating ARC expression. Our results identified a novel regulatory pathway for apoptosis involving miR-532-3p–ARC and possibly provide a valuable insight to protect against DOX cardiotoxicity during cancer chemical therapy.     

Neuronal NLRP1 inflammasome activation of Caspase-1 coordinately regulates inflammatory interleukin-1-beta production and axonal degeneration-associated Caspase-6 activation

Neuronal active Caspase-6 (Casp6) is associated with Alzheimer disease (AD), cognitive impairment, and axonal degeneration. Caspase-1 (Casp1) can activate Casp6 but the expression and functionality of Casp1-activating inflammasomes has not been well-defined in human neurons. Here, we show that primary cultures of human CNS neurons expressed functional Nod-like receptor protein 1 (NLRP1), absent in melanoma 2, and ICE protease activating factor, but not the NLRP3, inflammasome receptor components. NLRP1 neutralizing antibodies in a cell-free system, and NLRP1 siRNAs in neurons hampered stress-induced Casp1 activation. NLRP1 and Casp1 siRNAs also abolished stress-induced Casp6 activation in neurons. The functionality of the NLRP1 inflammasome in serum-deprived neurons was also demonstrated by NLRP1 siRNA-mediated inhibition of speck formation of the apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain conjugated to green fluorescent protein. These results indicated a novel stress-induced intraneuronal NLRP1/Casp1/Casp6 pathway. Lipopolysaccharide induced Casp1 and Casp6 activation in wild-type mice brain cortex, but not in that of Nlrp1^−/− and Casp1^−/− mice. NLRP1 immunopositive neurons were increased 25- to 30-fold in AD brains compared with non-AD brains. NLRP1 immunoreactivity in these neurons co-localized with Casp6 activity. Furthermore, the NLRP1/Casp1/Casp6 pathway increased amyloid beta peptide 42 ratio in serum-deprived neurons. Therefore, CNS human neurons express functional NLRP1 inflammasomes, which activate Casp1 and subsequently Casp6, thus revealing a fundamental mechanism linking intraneuronal inflammasome activation to Casp1-generated interleukin-1-β-mediated neuroinflammation and Casp6-mediated axonal degeneration.The lack of efficient treatment for Alzheimer disease (AD) is of high social and economical cost and a growing concern with the aging of the world''s population.¹ Therapies eliminating amyloid beta peptide (Aβ) from AD brains have unfortunately failed to stem progressive cognitive decline. These disappointing results have forced scientists to reconsider treatments against AD; some focusing on targeting Aβ earlier in disease, while others attempting to disaggregate the Tau protein in neurofibrillary tangles (NFT). Recently, the association of several immune responsive genes with increased AD risks^{2, 3, 4} have additionally revived interest in a possible etiological role for inflammation in AD.AD brain inflammation is attributed to activated microglia, which remove Aβ, and secrete neurotoxic molecules that induce neurodegeneration. Interleukin-1-beta (IL-1β), a critical component of brain neuroinflammation, is increased in AD brains⁵ and may contribute to AD pathology by increasing amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene expression, Tau hyperphosphorylation and memory impairment.⁶ However, anti-inflammatory therapies have not provided the expected beneficial effect in AD patients,⁷ suggesting that microglial inflammation may be a consequence of AD. Degenerating neurons are renowned initiators of brain inflammatory responses and the loss of synapses remains the best correlative marker of dementia in AD.⁸ This has incited us to study the response of human neurons to stress and to determine whether specific neuronal molecular events were initiated that link axonal degeneration to an inflammatory response.The active cysteinal Caspase-6 protease (Casp6), associated with axonal degeneration,^{9, 10, 11, 12, 13} is highly abundant in NFT, neuropil threads, and neuritic plaques of AD brains.¹⁴ In some aged non-cognitively impaired individuals, Casp6 activity in the entorhinal cortex and CA1 regions of the hippocampus,¹⁵ two areas initially affected by NFT pathology in AD,¹⁶ correlates significantly with lower cognitive performance.¹⁷ The expression of active Casp6 in CA1 pyramidal neurons of mouse brains is sufficient to induce age-dependent cognitive impairment, in the absence of plaques and tangles, which suggests that active Casp6 in AD brains could be a major contributor to axonal degeneration and cognitive decline.¹⁸Despite substantial evidence implicating Casp6 in AD, the pathways leading to Casp6 activation in neurons are unclear. Caspase-1 (Casp1) activates Casp6 in primary cultures of human CNS neurons.¹⁹ Inflammasome multiprotein complexes, constituted of danger sensing nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors or the DNA sensing absent in melanoma 2 (AIM2) component, and the apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase recruitment domain (ASC), recruit and induce Casp1 self-activation.^{20, 21} Functional Nod-like receptor protein 1 (NLRP1), Nod-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3), AIM2, and ICE protease activating factor (IPAF-1) inflammasomes have been characterized primarily in peripheral macrophages²² and CNS microglia.^{23, 24} Recently, reports have indicated inflammasome receptor expression and activation in rodent neurons. Rat cerebellar granule neurons submitted to oxygen and glucose deprivation or reduced potassium levels increased Nlrp1 mRNA levels.^{25, 26} Nuclear Nlrp1 or functional Nlrp1 inflammasome complexes increased in rat cortical neurons after traumatic brain injury, stroke, and glucose-oxygen deprivation insults.^{27, 28, 29, 30, 31} Neuronal Nlrp1 increased in rats submitted to spinal cord or sciatic nerve injury,^{29, 32} and in aging rat hippocampus or ethanol treated hippocampal slice cultures.^{33, 34} Aim2 induced pyroptosis in rat cortical neuron cultures and traumatic brain injury.³⁵ Nlrp1 has been reported in human brain pyramidal neurons³⁶ and inflammasome receptor mRNAs were observed in human neuron cultures and human Rasmussen''s encephalitis.³⁷Here, we assessed which inflammasome could activate Casp1 and subsequently Casp6 in human primary CNS cultures. We determined which inflammasomes were expressed in naive and stressed neurons and used siRNAs and S-100 cell-free extracts treated with specific inflammasome activators, or antibody blockers, to identify the functional inflammasome. We uncovered that the NLRP1, AIM2, and IPAF-1, but not the NLRP3, inflammasomes were expressed and functional in neurons and that the NLRP1 inflammasome was responsible for Casp1 and subsequently Casp6 activation in serum-deprived and benzylated ATP (BzATP)-stressed neurons. NLRP1 was co-localized with Casp6 activity, immunostained 25- to 30-fold more neurons in AD, and increased Aβ₄₂ in serum-deprived neurons. The NLRP1–Casp1–Casp6 pathway was blocked in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-treated Nlrp1^−/− and Casp1^−/− mice brains. These results reveal a molecular cascade linking neuronal inflammasome-mediated Casp1 activation to Casp6 activation and provide unexpected novel common neuronal therapeutic targets against neuroinflammation, axonal degeneration, and cognitive impairment in AD.     

Protein kinase D1/2 is involved in the maturation of multivesicular bodies and secretion of exosomes in T and B lymphocytes

Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are endocytic compartments that enclose intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) formed by inward budding from the limiting membrane of endosomes. In T lymphocytes, these ILV contain Fas ligand (FasL) and are secreted as ''lethal exosomes'' following activation-induced fusion of the MVB with the plasma membrane. Diacylglycerol (DAG) and diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) regulate MVB maturation and polarized traffic, as well as subsequent secretion of pro-apoptotic exosomes, but the molecular basis underlying these phenomena remains unclear. Here we identify protein kinase D (PKD) family members as DAG effectors involved in MVB genesis and secretion. We show that the inducible secretion of exosomes is enhanced when a constitutively active PKD1 mutant is expressed in T lymphocytes, whereas exosome secretion is impaired in PKD2-deficient mouse T lymphoblasts and in PKD1/3-null B cells. Analysis of PKD2-deficient T lymphoblasts showed the presence of large, immature MVB-like vesicles and demonstrated defects in cytotoxic activity and in activation-induced cell death. Using pharmacological and genetic tools, we show that DGKα regulates PKD1/2 subcellular localization and activation. Our studies demonstrate that PKD1/2 is a key regulator of MVB maturation and exosome secretion, and constitutes a mediator of the DGKα effect on MVB secretory traffic.Exosomes are nanovesicles that form as intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) inside multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and are then secreted by numerous cell types.¹ ILVs are generated by inward budding of late endosome limiting membrane in a precisely regulated maturation process.^{2, 3} Two main pathways are involved in MVB maturation.^{4, 5} In addition to the ESCRT (endosomal complex required for traffic) proteins,⁶ there is increasing evidence that lipids such as lyso-bisphosphatidic acid (LBPA),⁷ ceramides⁸ and diacylglycerol (DAG)⁹ contribute to this membrane invagination process.Exosomes participate in many biological processes related to T-cell receptor (TCR)-triggered immune responses, including T lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity and activation-induced cell death (AICD), antigen presentation and intercellular miRNA exchange.^{10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15} The discovery of exosome involvement in these responses increased interest in the regulation of exosome biogenesis and secretory traffic, with special attention to the contribution of lipids such as ceramide and DAG, as well as DAG-binding proteins.^{14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21} These studies suggest that positive and negative DAG regulators may control secretory traffic. By transforming DAG into phosphatidic acid (PA), diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) is essential for the negative control of DAG function in T lymphocytes.²² DGKα translocates transiently to the T-cell membrane after human muscarinic type 1 receptor (HM1R) triggering or to the immune synapse (IS) after TCR stimulation; at these subcellular locations, DGKα acts as a negative modulator of phospholipase C (PLC)-generated DAG.^{23, 24}The secretory vesicle pathway involves several DAG-controlled checkpoints at which DGKα may act; these include vesicle formation and fission at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), MVB maturation, as well as their transport, docking and fusion to the plasma membrane.^{9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20} The molecular components that regulate some of these trafficking processes include protein kinase D (PKD) family members.²¹ PKD1 activity, for instance, regulates fission of transport vesicles from TGN via direct interaction with the pre-existing DAG pool at this site.¹⁹ The cytosolic serine/threonine kinases PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3^{(ref. 21)} are expressed in a wide range of cells, with PKD2 the most abundant isotype in T lymphocytes.^{25, 26} PKD have two DAG-binding domains (C1a and C1b) at the N terminus,²¹ which mediate PKD recruitment to cell membranes. Protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation at the PKD activation loop further promotes PKD autophosphorylation and activation.²⁷Based on our previous studies showing DGKα regulation of DAG in MVB formation and exosome secretion,^{9, 14, 28} and the identification of PKD1/2 association to MVB,¹⁴ we hypothesized that DGKα control of DAG mediates these events, at least in part, through PKD. Here we explored whether, in addition to its role in vesicle fission from TGN,¹⁹ PKD regulates other steps in the DAG-controlled secretory traffic pathway. Using PKD-deficient cell models, we analyzed the role of PKD1/2 in MVB formation and function, and demonstrate their implication in exosome secretory traffic.     

Ret is essential to mediate GDNF's neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effect in a Parkinson disease mouse model

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent survival and regeneration-promoting factor for dopaminergic neurons in cell and animal models of Parkinson disease (PD). GDNF is currently tested in clinical trials on PD patients with so far inconclusive results. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ret is the canonical GDNF receptor, but several alternative GDNF receptors have been proposed, raising the question of which signaling receptor mediates here the beneficial GDNF effects. To address this question we overexpressed GDNF in the striatum of mice deficient for Ret in dopaminergic neurons and subsequently challenged these mice with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Strikingly, in this established PD mouse model, the absence of Ret completely abolished GDNF''s neuroprotective and regenerative effect on the midbrain dopaminergic system. This establishes Ret signaling as absolutely required for GDNF''s effects to prevent and compensate dopaminergic system degeneration and suggests Ret activation as the primary target of GDNF therapy in PD.Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is the founding member of the four ligands in the GDNF family, which belong to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily.¹ GDNF was characterized as a potent survival factor for many neurons in culture such as dopaminergic, motor, sympathetic, parasympathetic, sensory and enteric neurons.^{1, 2} In addition, in dopaminergic neuron cultures GDNF stimulates neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth, synapse formation and dopamine release.^{1, 2}As degeneration of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) represents a major hallmark of Parkinson disease (PD), the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder, GDNF has raised considerable interest as a therapeutic molecule for the treatment of PD.^{3, 4, 5} PD affects >2% of individuals over the age of 60 years, but no curative treatment is available to date, mainly due to a lack of understanding disease etiology.^{6, 7, 8} Preclinical studies in the established 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rodent and primate models of PD demonstrated a substantial neuroprotection and regeneration effect by striatal provided GDNF or its close relative neurturin.^{3, 4, 9} However, clinical phase II trials on PD patients using GDNF or neurturin did so far not convincingly recapitulate their beneficial effects on the dopaminergic system in humans most likely due to technical problems and the selection of advanced PD patients.^{10, 11, 12, 13}GDNF signaling is highly complex as this neurotrophic factor can bind to a variety of receptors, thus being able to induce pleiotropic effects. GDNF efficiently binds to the GPI-linked GDNF family receptor α1 (GFRα1).^{1, 2} It has been shown that the GDNF/GFRα1 complex can activate not only the canonical GDNF receptor Ret, a receptor tyrosine kinase which signals through the sarcoma protein (Src)/rat sarcoma (Ras)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, NF-κB (nuclear factor ''kappa-light-chain-enhancer'' of activated B cells), JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinases) and PLCγ (phospholipase γ) pathway, but also with other signaling inducing receptors.^{1, 2, 4, 5, 13} So far, at least four alternative GDNF receptors have been described which are all expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons, NCAM,^{14, 15} the integrins αV and βI,^{14, 16} syndecan 3¹⁷ and N-cadherin.¹⁸ Interestingly, Ret is not essential during pre- and postnatal development of the mouse dopaminergic system,^{19, 20, 21, 22, 23} but specifically required for the maintenance of SNpc dopaminergic neurons and their striatal innervation in aged mice.^{23, 24, 25} In contrast, GDNF seems most likely under physiological conditions to be dispensable during development and maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in mice, although conflicting results exist.^{26, 27, 28} Thus, Ret might be activated by a GDNF-independent mechanism to stimulate SNpc dopaminergic neuron survival. In addition, the in vivo function of the alternative GDNF receptors in the dopaminergic system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions, like PD, and their dependence on GDNF has not yet been addressed in detail. This raised the important question which GDNF receptor might be required to mediate GDNF''s reported neuroprotective and regenerative effect in the dopaminergic system in PD animal models and potentially in PD patients.^{5, 29}Previously, we showed in dopaminergic neuron-specific Ret knockout mice that Ret receptor loss does not result in a higher vulnerability of midbrain dopaminergic neurons against MPTP but to less resprouting of left over dopaminergic neuron axons in the striatum after MPTP intoxication.³⁰ In adult mice endogenous GDNF levels are rather low.^{26, 31} Therefore, we could not rule out in that study the possibility, that higher levels of GDNF—as also used in the clinical GDNF trials in PD patients—might have neuroprotective and regenerating effects even in the absence of the Ret receptor. Here we addressed now this question by viral overexpression of GDNF in MPTP-treated mice lacking expression of Ret again specifically in dopaminergic neurons.^{23, 30} We found that in the absence of Ret in dopaminergic neurons even a substantial overexpression of GDNF in the striatum does not have a neuroprotective and regenerative effect. Thus, despite the expression of alternative GDNF receptors on midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the presence of the canonical GDNF receptor Ret seems to be mandatory for mediating GDNF''s beneficial survival and axonal resprouting effect in these neurons.