Non‐canonical roles of tRNAs and tRNA mimics in bacterial cell biology

Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are the macromolecules that transfer activated amino acids from aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases to the ribosome, where they are used for the mRNA guided synthesis of proteins. Transfer RNAs are ancient molecules, perhaps even predating the existence of the translation machinery. Albeit old, these molecules are tremendously conserved, a characteristic that is well illustrated by the fact that some bacterial tRNAs are efficient and specific substrates of eukaryotic aminoacyl‐tRNA synthetases and ribosomes. Considering their ancient origin and high structural conservation, it is not surprising that tRNAs have been hijacked during evolution for functions outside of translation. These roles beyond translation include synthetic, regulatory and information functions within the cell. Here we provide an overview of the non‐canonical roles of tRNAs and their mimics in bacteria, and discuss some of the common themes that arise when comparing these different functions.     

氨酰-tRNA合成酶的研究进展

氨酰-tRNA合成酶催化特异的氨基酸与同源tRNA氨酰化,从而保证了遗传密码翻译的忠实性。这些古老而保守的蛋白质分子除了具有酶的功能外,在哺乳动物细胞中还发现了多种其他功能,具有重要的应用价值。在寻找具有全新作用机制的新抗生素以应对日益严重的抗生素耐药现象过程中,氨酰-tRNA合成酶是细菌蛋白质合成过程中重要的、新颖的靶标,成为关注的重点。定向突变的氨酰-tRNA合成酶可以用来定点掺入非天然氨基酸,扩展蛋白质工程。今后,随着人们对氨酰-tRNA合成酶研究的不断深入,它们还可能用来治疗肿瘤等多种疾病。     

Cysteinyl-tRNA deacylation can be uncoupled from protein synthesis

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) are critical components of protein translation, providing ribosomes with aminoacyl-tRNAs. In return, ribosomes release uncharged tRNAs as ARS substrates. Here, we show that tRNA deacylation can be uncoupled from protein synthesis in an amino acid specific manner. While tRNAs coupled to radiolabeled Met, Leu Lys, or Ser are stable in cells following translation inhibition with arsenite, radiolabeled Cys is released from tRNA at a high rate. We discuss possible translation independent functions for tRNA(Cys).     

Genomics and the evolution of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis.

Translation is the process by which ribosomes direct protein synthesis using the genetic information contained in messenger RNA (mRNA). Transfer RNAs (tRNAs) are charged with an amino acid and brought to the ribosome, where they are paired with the corresponding trinucleotide codon in mRNA. The amino acid is attached to the nascent polypeptide and the ribosome moves on to the next codon. Thus, the sequential pairing of codons in mRNA with tRNA anticodons determines the order of amino acids in a protein. It is therefore imperative for accurate translation that tRNAs are only coupled to amino acids corresponding to the RNA anticodon. This is mostly, but not exclusively, achieved by the direct attachment of the appropriate amino acid to the 3'-end of the corresponding tRNA by the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. To ensure the accurate translation of genetic information, the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases must display an extremely high level of substrate specificity. Despite this highly conserved function, recent studies arising from the analysis of whole genomes have shown a significant degree of evolutionary diversity in aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis. For example, non-canonical routes have been identified for the synthesis of Asn-tRNA, Cys-tRNA, Gln-tRNA and Lys-tRNA. Characterization of non-canonical aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis has revealed an unexpected level of evolutionary divergence and has also provided new insights into the possible precursors of contemporary aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases.     

RNA minihelices and the decoding of genetic information

The rules of the genetic code are determined by the specific aminoacylation of transfer RNAs by aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetase. A straightforward analysis shows that a system of synthetase-tRNA interactions that relies on anticodons for specificity could, in principle, enable most synthetases to distinguish their cognate tRNA isoacceptors from all others. Although the anticodons of some tRNAs are recognition sites for the cognate aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, for other synthetases the anticodon is dispensable for specific aminoacylation. In particular, alanine and histidine tRNA synthetases aminoacylate small RNA minihelices that reconstruct the part of their cognate tRNAs that is proximate to the amino acid attachment site. Helices with as few as six base pairs can be efficiently aminoacylated. The specificity of aminoacylation is determined by a few nucleotides and can be converted from one amino acid to another by the change of only a few nucleotides. These findings suggest that, for a subgroup of the synthetases, there is a distinct code in the acceptor helix of transfer RNAs that determines aminoacylation specificity.     

A tRNA aminoacylation system for non-natural amino acids based on a programmable ribozyme

The ability to recognize tRNA identities is essential to the function of the genetic coding system. In translation aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) recognize the identities of tRNAs and charge them with their cognate amino acids. We show that an in vitro evolved ribozyme can also discriminate between specific tRNAs, and can transfer amino acids to the 3' ends of cognate tRNAs. The ribozyme interacts with both the CCA-3' terminus and the anticodon loop of tRNA(fMet), and its tRNA specificity is controlled by these interactions. This feature allows us to program the selectivity of the ribozyme toward specific tRNAs, and therefore to tailor effective aminoacyl-transfer catalysts. This method potentially provides a means of generating aminoacyl tRNAs that are charged with non-natural amino acids, which could be incorporated into proteins through cell-free translation.     

Amino acid modifications on tRNA

The accurate formation of cognate aminoacyl-transfer RNAs (aa-tRNAs) is essential for the fidelity of translation. Most amino acids are esterified onto their cognate tRNA isoacceptors directly by aa-tRNA synthetases. However, in the case of four amino acids (Gln, Asn, Cys and Sec), aminoacyl-tRNAs are made through indirect pathways in many organisms across all three domains of life. The process begins with the charging of noncognate amino acids to tRNAs by a specialized synthetase in the case of Cys-tRNA(Cys) formation or by synthetases with relaxed specificity, such as the non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA, non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA and seryl-tRNA synthetases. The resulting misacylated tRNAs are then converted to cognate pairs through transformation of the amino acids on the tRNA, which is catalyzed by a group of tRNA-dependent modifying enzymes, such as tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, Sep-tRNA:Cys-tRNA synthase, O-phosphoseryl-tRNA kinase and Sep-tRNA:Sec-tRNA synthase. The majority of these indirect pathways are widely spread in all domains of life and thought to be part of the evolutionary process.     

Congruence of evidence for a Methanopyrus-proximal root of life based on transfer RNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes

Among 60 organisms, the intraspecies genetic distances between tRNAs cognate for different amino acids, between the initiator and elongator tRNAs for Met, and between potentially paralogous pairs of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are found to be at a minimum within the Methanopyrus kandleri genome. These results indicate an exact congruence between the evidence from tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase genes locating the root of life closest to this organism.     

Introduction of specialty functions by the position-specific incorporation of nonnatural amino acids into proteins through four-base codon/anticodon pairs

Position-specific incorporation of nonnatural amino acids into proteins (nonnatural mutagenesis) via an in vitro protein synthesizing system was applied to incorporate a variety of amino acids carrying specialty side groups. A list of nonnatural amino acids thus far successfully incorporated through in vitro translation systems is presented. The position of nonnatural amino acid incorporation was directed by four-base codon/anticodon pairs such as CGGG/CCCG and AGGU/ACCU. The four-base codon strategy was more efficient than the amber codon strategy and could incorporate multiple nonnatural amino acids into single proteins. This multiple mutagenesis will find wide applications, especially in building paths of electron transfer on proteins. The extension of translation systems by the introduction of nonnatural amino acids, four-base codon/anticodon pairs, orthogonal tRNAs, and artificial aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, is a promising approach towards the creation of "synthetic microorganisms" with specialty functions.     

Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity.

Correct expression of the genetic code at translation is directly correlated with tRNA identity. This survey describes the molecular signals in tRNAs that trigger specific aminoacylations. For most tRNAs, determinants are located at the two distal extremities: the anticodon loop and the amino acid accepting stem. In a few tRNAs, however, major identity signals are found in the core of the molecule. Identity elements have different strengths, often depend more on k cat effects than on K m effects and exhibit additive, cooperative or anti-cooperative interplay. Most determinants are in direct contact with cognate synthetases, and chemical groups on bases or ribose moieties that make functional interactions have been identified in several systems. Major determinants are conserved in evolution; however, the mechanisms by which they are expressed are species dependent. Recent studies show that alternate identity sets can be recognized by a single synthetase, and emphasize the importance of tRNA architecture and anti-determinants preventing false recognition. Identity rules apply to tRNA-like molecules and to minimalist tRNAs. Knowledge of these rules allows the manipulation of identity elements and engineering of tRNAs with switched, altered or multiple specificities.     

MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry methods for evaluation of in vitro aminoacyl tRNA production

Unnatural amino acid mutagenesis requires the in vitro production of aminoacyl tRNAs. Bacteriophage T4 RNA ligase is used to ligate a-amino-protected dCA amino acids to 74mer tRNA. Previously, there has been no facile method for evaluating the efficiency of this reaction prior to using the tRNA in translation. We report a novel use of matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry in monitoring the formation of aminoacyl 76mer tRNA. This method is more efficient and precise than the traditional technique of gel electrophoresis. These MALDI conditions should also prove useful for analyzing aminoacyl tRNAs produced through aminoacyl tRNA synthetases and other methods.     

tRNA genes and the genetic code

The genetic code describes translational assignments between codons and amino acids. tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are those molecules by means of which these assignments are established. Any aaRS recognizes its tRNAs according to some of their nucleotides called identity elements (IEs). Let a 1Mut-similarity Sim (1Mut) be the average similarity between such tRNA genes whose codons differ by one point mutation. We showed that: (1) a global maximum of Sim (1Mut) is reached at the standard genetic code 27 times for 4 sets of IEs of tRNA genes of eukaryotic species, while it is so only 5 times for similarities Sim (C&R) between all tRNA genes whose codons lie in the same column or row of the code. Therefore, point mutations of anticodons were tested by nature to recruit tRNAs from one isoaccepting group to another, (2) because plain similarities Sim (all) between tRNA genes of species within any of the three domains of life are higher than between tRNA genes of species belonging to different domains, tRNA genes retained information about early evolution of cells, (3) we searched the order of tRNAs in which they were most probably assigned to their codons and amino acids. The beginning Ala, (Val), Pro, Ile, Lys, Arg, Trp, Met, Asp, Cys, (Ser) of our resulting chronology lies under a plateau on a graph of Sim (1Mut,IE)(univ.ancestors) plotted over this chronology for a set S(IE) of all IEs of tRNA genes, whose universal ancestors were separately computed for each codon. This plateau has remained preserved along the whole line of evolution of the code and is consistent with observations of Ribas de Pouplana and Schimmel [2001. Aminoacy1-tRNA synthetases: potential markers of genetic code development. Trends Biochem. Sci. 26, 591-598] that specific pairs of aaRSs-one from each of their two classes-can be docked simultaneously onto the acceptor stem of tRNA and hence an interaction existed between their ancestors using a reduced code, (4) sharpness of a local maximum of Sim (1Mut) at the standard code is almost 100% along our chronologies.     

Identifying the ligated amino acid of archaeal tRNAs based on positions outside the anticodon

Proper recognition of tRNAs by their aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is essential for translation accuracy. Following evidence that the enzymes can recognize the correct tRNA even when anticodon information is masked, we search for additional nucleotide positions within the tRNA molecule that potentially contain information for amino acid identification. Analyzing 3936 sequences of tRNA genes from 86 archaeal species, we show that the tRNAs’ cognate amino acids can be identified by the information embedded in the tRNAs’ nucleotide positions without relying on the anticodon information. We present a small set of six to 10 informative positions along the tRNA, which allow for amino acid identification accuracy of 90.6% to 97.4%, respectively. We inspected tRNAs for each of the 20 amino acid types for such informative positions and found that tRNA genes for some amino acids are distinguishable from others by as few as one or two positions. The informative nucleotide positions are in agreement with nucleotide positions that were experimentally shown to affect the loaded amino acid identity. Interestingly, the knowledge gained from the tRNA genes of one archaeal phylum does not extrapolate well to another phylum. Furthermore, each species has a unique ensemble of nucleotides in the informative tRNA positions, and the similarity between the sets of positions of two distinct species reflects their evolutionary distance. Hence, we term this set of informative positions a “tRNA cipher.” It is tempting to suggest that the diverging code identified here might also serve the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase in the task of tRNA recognition.     

Functional Analysis of Human tRNA Isodecoders

tRNA isodecoders share the same anticodon but have differences in their body sequence. An unexpected result from genome sequencing projects is the identification of a large number of tRNA isodecoder genes in mammalian genomes. In the reference human genome, more than 270 isodecoder genes are present among the approximately 450 tRNA genes distributed among 49 isoacceptor families. Whether sequence diversity among isodecoder tRNA genes reflects functional variability is an open question. To address this, we developed a method to quantify the efficiency of tRNA isodecoders in stop-codon suppression in human cell lines. First, a green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene that contains a single UAG stop codon at two distinct locations is introduced. GFP is only produced when a tRNA suppressor containing CUA anticodon is co-transfected with the GFP gene. The suppression efficiency is examined for 31 tRNA isodecoders (all contain CUA anticodon), 21 derived from four isoacceptor families of tRNA^Ser genes, 7 from five families of tRNA^Leu genes, and 3 from three families of tRNA^Ala genes. We found that isodecoder tRNAs display a large difference in their suppression efficiency. Among those with above background suppression activity, differences of up to 20-fold were observed. We were able to tune tRNA suppression efficiency by subtly adjusting the tRNA sequence and inter-convert poor suppressors into potent ones. We also demonstrate that isodecoder tRNAs with varying suppression efficiencies have similar stability and exhibit similar levels of aminoacylation in vivo. Our results indicate that naturally occurring tRNA isodecoders can have large functional variations and suggest that some tRNA isodecoders may perform a function distinct from translation.     

Activation of angiogenic signaling pathways by two human tRNA synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases establish the rules of the genetic code by joining amino acids to tRNAs that bear the anticodon triplets corresponding to the attached amino acids. The enzymes are thought to be among the earliest proteins to appear, in the transition from a putative RNA world to the theater of proteins. Over their long evolution, the enzymes have acquired additional functions that typically require specialized insertions or domain fusions. Recently, fragments of the closely related human tyrosyl- and tryptophanyl-tRNA synthetases were discovered to be active in angiogenesis signaling pathways. One synthetase fragment has proangiogenic activity, while the other is antiangiogenic. Activity was demonstrated in cell-based assays in vitro and in vivo in the chick embryo, and in the neonatal and adult mouse. The full-length, native enzymes are inactive in these same assays. Activation of angiogenesis activity requires fragment production from the native enzymes by protease cleavage or by translation of alternatively spliced pre-mRNA. Thus, these tRNA synthetases link translation to a major cell-signaling pathway in mammalian cells. The results with animals suggest that therapeutic applications are possible with these tRNA synthetases.     

RNA tetraloops as minimalist substrates for aminoacylation.

Previous work established that seven-base-pair hairpin microhelices with sequences based on the acceptor stems of alanine, glycine, methionine, and histidine tRNAs can be aminoacylated specifically with their cognate amino acids. To obtain "minimalist" substrates with fewer base pairs, we took advantage of the high thermodynamic stability of RNA tetraloop motifs that are found in ribosomal RNAs. We show here that rationally designed RNA tetraloops with as few as four base pairs are substrates for aminoacylation. Major nucleotide determinants for recognition by the class II synthetases were incorporated into each of the respective tetraloop substrates, resulting in specific aminoacylation by the alanine, glycine, and histidine tRNA synthetases. An analysis of the kinetics of aminoacylation shows that, for the alanine system, the majority of the transition-state stabilization provided by the synthetase-tRNA interaction is reproduced by the interaction of the synthetase with nucleotides in its minimalist tetraloop substrate. In an extension of this work, we also observed specific aminoacylation with the class I methionine tRNA synthetase of RNA tetraloops based on sequences in the acceptor stem of methionine tRNA. Thus, the results demonstrate four different examples where specific aminoacylation is directed by sequences/structures contained in less than half of a turn of an RNA helix.     

Recent results on how aminoacyl transfer RNA synthetases recognize specific transfer RNAs

Summary Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases discriminate between tRNA species by a highly specific mechanism. Physical and chemical studies indicate that the synthetases bind along and around the inside of the three-dimensional L-shaped tRNA structure. Studies of mutant tRNAs that affect synthetase interaction tend to confirm this conclusion. However, in contrast to proteins that recognize a specific block of contiguous nucleotide units (e.g., repressors, restriction enzymes, etc.), synthetases appear to interact with spatially disperse elements of the structure. Available evidence suggests that tRNA binding clefts on various synthetases may be roughly similar, with specificity being achieved by the choice of amino acid residues in a few critical positions in the tRNA binding clefts. With this idea in mind, it should be possible to introduce amino acid substitutions into the binding clefts and thereby change tRNA recognition specificity. This has been attempted (by genetic manipulations) and a mutant alanine tRNA synthetase with altered tRNA recognition has been isolated. This enzyme can attach alanine to isoleucine specific tRNA. When presented with valine specific tRNA, a tRNA similar in some structural features to the isoleucine specific tRNA, or with the structurally quite different tyrosine specific tRNA, no significant aminoacylation occurs. Thus, a precise specificity alteration can occur through mutation; this result supports the idea of similarities in synthetase binding clefts, with specificity being achieved by the positioning of amino acids at critical positions in these clefts. Finally, further data have been obtained on the issue of possible transient covalent bond formation between synthetases and tRNAs, as a critical part of the interaction.Abbreviations tRNA^x a tRNA specific for the amino acid - x where x is given the standard 3 letter abbreviation     

The primary structure of human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. A highly conserved core, amino acid repeat regions, and homologies with translation elongation factors

We describe the nucleotide sequences of several overlapping cDNA clones specific for human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase. The identified open reading frame indicates that the enzyme is composed of 1440 amino acids. A stretch of about 360 amino acids of the human enzyme is highly conserved in bacterial and yeast glutaminyl-tRNA synthetases. However, the human enzyme is three times larger than the bacterial and twice as large as the yeast enzyme suggesting that a considerable part of human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase has evolved to perform functions other than the charging of tRNA. The sequence outside of the conserved core region includes three 57-amino acid repeats followed by a consecutive stretch of 11 charged amino acids. A computer assisted search of two protein data banks reveals that the human glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase shares small blocks of amino acid similarities with several other synthetases of different amino acid specificities. Interestingly, the enzyme also possesses some regions of similarities with eukaryotic translation elongation factor EF-1 but not with any other sequence stored in the protein data banks. The coding regions of human and mouse glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase cDNAs are identical at 94% of the codons. However, the 3'-noncoding regions of mouse and human mRNAs are more divergent (approximately 68%) but both possess the potential to form stable secondary structures of similar general architecture.