Opciones terapéuticas para el tratamiento antifúngico en el paciente crítico

Invasive fungal infections, especially in the critical care setting, have become an excellent target for prophylactic, empiric, and pre-emptive therapy interventions due to their associated high morbidity, mortality rate, increased incidence, and healthcare costs. For these reasons, new studies and laboratory tests have been developed over the last few years in order to formulate an early therapeutic intervention strategy in an attempt to reduce the high mortality rate associated with these infections. In recent years, evidencebased studies have shown the roles that the new antifungal drugs play in the treatment of invasive mycosis in seriously ill and complex patients, although data from critically ill patients are more limited. New antifungal agents have been analyzed in different clinical situations in critical care units, and the increasing number of non-Candida albicans species suggest that the application of early echinocandin therapy in critically ill patients with invasive candidiasis is a good option. Voriconazole should be recommended for invasive aspergillosis as a first line option.     

Systemic antifungals. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics

Invasive fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill non neutropenic patients. For many years, amphotericin B and flucytosine have been the only available antifungal agents for invasive fungal infections. Fortunately, the antifungal armamentarium has increased during the past two decades with the addition of several new agents. In addition to itraconazole and fluconazole, lipid formulations of amphotericin B, voriconazole, and caspofungin have been recently licensed. These various antifungal agents differ in their pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile.     

Candidiasis invasora en el paciente crítico quemado

BackgroundThe advances in burn care therapy have extended considerably the survival of seriously burned patients, exposing them to infectious complications, notably fungal infections. Due to the difficulty in the diagnosis of invasive mycoses and their high associated mortality rates, approaches to prophylactic or pre-emptive antifungal therapy in high-risk burned patients have been proposed, although these guidelines remain controversial. On the other hand, the management of these conditions is a serious problem, especially in critically ill patients with multiorgan failure, including severely ill burn patients due to the shortage of available antifungal agents. However, in the last several years, the range of antifungal agents has been significantly extended, which have led to an improvement in the treatment of invasive fungal infection in this population.Clinical caseWe report a case of invasive candidiasis in a severelly ill burns patient successfully treated with an echinocandin. In this case report, current treatment options are discussed, and a review of the literature of previously published cases is made.ConclusionsThere are still significant gaps in our knowledge of the optimal diagnostic and management approach for invasive candidiasis in burn patients. Prospective studies are needed in this population to optimise management and improve outcomes in this state of high morbidity and mortality.     

Antifungal activity of nontraditional antifungal agents

Invasive fungal infections are becoming increasingly important in the management of critically ill and immunocompromised patients. As organ and stem cell transplantation becomes more prominent and immune therapies are employed for diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and plaque psoriasis, the population of patients at risk continues to grow. Many invasive fungal infections are associated with extremely high mortality rates. Antifungal options are limited and novel therapies are intriguing as we attempt to improve patient outcomes and preserve the antifungal armamentarium. Many other classes of pharmaceuticals typically seen as non-antifungal do in fact have significant antifungal activity. Prominent among these are calcineurin inhibitors, antiarrhythmics, antidepressants, antibacterials, and others. Some have activity alone and some augment the activity of conventional antifungals. Unfortunately, clinical data are lacking for most of these agents and their role in therapy remains undefined. This review focuses on several representative non-antifungal agents with antifungal activity.     

Current Diagnosis and Management of Mucormycoses

Due to the rising incidence of diabetes mellitus, the increasing populations of immunocompromised individuals of varied etiologies, and the progresses that have been made in the management of the critically ill, the incidence of invasive fungal infections, in particular those caused by the Mucorales, is increasing. Currently available diagnostics frequently miss this infection. Knowledge of the factors placing individuals at risk for and the varied clinical presentations of mucormycosis should alert clinicians of the possible presence of this infection. Survival of individuals with mucormycosis is dependant on prompt diagnosis and aggressive therapy with antifungal agents; surgical debridement; and, if possible, reversal of the risk factors predisposing the individual to this infection. It is hoped that improved diagnostic testing, improvements in pharmacotherapy, and adjunctive therapies will improve the morbidity and mortality of mucormycosis.     

Antifungal Prophylaxis in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit

Invasive fungal infections in children have shown a dramatic increase over the last two decades. Their importance and clinical implications are more prominent in selected groups of patients such as critically ill children in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). This population constitutes an important target for prophylactic antifungal interventions. While antifungal agents have been studied in various clinical settings, knowledge in this particular setting is rather scant. The current data suggest that antifungal prophylaxis in the PICU setting should be tailored to the needs of each patient guided by the individual’s risk factors and local epidemiology.

     

An update on the pharmacoeconomics of antifungal pharmacotherapy

The incidence and severity of invasive fungal infections are on the rise and they pose a risk of significant morbidity and mortality. The cost burden of fungal infections in the United States is high. There are many newer, less toxic antifungal agents to manage these challenging infections; however, these agents also carry a high cost of their own. When considering an antifungal agent for a specific patient, it is important to consider safety, efficacy, and cost, thus making it essential to continually evaluate the antifungal pharmacoeconomic literature to assist in the therapeutic decision-making process for patients with invasive fungal infections. Unfortunately, there is a lack of pharmacoeconomic studies addressing the costs associated with the treatment and prevention of fungal infections. Future large-scale clinical studies should include pharmacoeconomic analyses and end points that encompass all costs associated with antifungal drug use, not solely drug acquisition costs.     

Pediatric pharmacology of antifungal agents

Pediatric age groups display important differences in host biology, predisposing conditions, epidemiology, and presentation of fungal infections relative to the adult population. Over the past decade, major advances have been made in the field of medical mycology. Most importantly, an array of new antifungal agents has entered the clinical arena. Although pediatric approval of several of these agents remains to be established, the pediatric development of antifungal agents is moving forward. Invasive fungal infections will remain important causes for morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised pediatric patients. Although the availability of new therapeutic options is an important advance, antifungal therapy has become increasingly complex, and a thorough understanding of the available antifungal armamentarium is essential for the successful management of individual patients.     

Primary and Secondary Antifungal Prophylaxis in the Immunocompromised Child: Where do we Stand?

Invasive opportunistic fungal infections are important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised children undergoing chemotherapy or haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Primary and secondary chemoprophylaxis of invasive fungal infections targets high risk disease-related patients with acute myeloid leukaemia, high risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemias, recurrent leukaemias and those following allogeneic HSCT. The rationale for antifungal prophylaxis in high risk patients comes from two different aspects. On the one hand, is the difficulty of instant diagnosis and, on the other hand, the consequences of morbidity and mortality by invasive infectious diseases. Although we have limited pediatric data concerning antifungal prophylaxis, it has become part of infectious disease supportive care schemes in most of paediatric leukaemia and HSCT centres. This review has insights on the evidence concerning primary and secondary antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children. Although our knowledge comes from large adult studies concerning antifungal agents, there is a great need for evidence of primary or secondary antifungal prophylaxis in large pediatric clinical trials in order to have a consensus in primary and secondary antifungal prophylaxis in immunocompromised children.     

Antifungal Therapy in Pediatric Patients

Invasive fungal infections still play a major role in morbidity and mortality in pediatric patients, especially in children undergoing therapy for an underlying malignancy and in preterm infants. Relative to the adult population, pediatric age groups display important differences not only in host biology, predisposing conditions, epidemiology, and presentation of fungal infections, but also in the disposition and clearance of antifungal compounds. During the past decade, several new antifungal agents have been developed. Although not all of these agents are yet approved for children, the pediatric development of antifungal agents has moved forward in an exemplary manner, which is essential for the successful management of the individual patient. This article reviews the current data on pharmacokinetics, safety, and dosing of antifungal agents in pediatric patients.     

Recommendations for fungal opportunistic infections prevention in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Fungal infections have become important causes of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised hosts, including those with the acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Although significant therapeutic advances are being made in the field of antiretroviral therapy, parallel advances must be attained in the management of secondary infections, including those due to fungi. As increasing numbers of people with HIV infection come in to medical attention, the problem of fungal infections will also increase, requiring innovative approaches toward understanding the pathogenesis of these infections and developing new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities. A better understanding is required for the immunopathogenesis of fungal infections. Improved understanding of new and established antifungal agents in conjunction with ART agents as well as immune modulators, should yield important advances in prevention, control and treatment of fungal infections of HIV infected people.     

AmBisome,tres retos: infección por Candida auris,infección del sistema nervioso central e infección asociada a biopelículas

The treatment of invasive fungal infections remains a challenge, both for the diagnosis and for the need of providing the appropriate antifungal therapy. Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast that is responsible for hospital outbreaks, especially in intensive care units; it is characterized by a high resistance to the antifungal agents and can become multidrug-resistant. At present, the recommended antifungal agents for the invasive infections with this pathogen are echinocandins, always after carrying out an antifungal susceptibility testing. In case of no clinical response or persistent candidemia, the addition of liposomal amphotericin B or isavuconazole may be considered. Both fungal infection of the central nervous system and that associated with biomedical devices remain rare entities affecting mainly immunocompromised patients. However, an increase in their incidence in recent years, along with high morbidity and mortality, has been shown. The treatment of these infections is conditioned by the limited knowledge of the pharmacokinetic properties of antifungals. A better understanding of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the different antifungals is essential to determine the efficacy of the antifungal agents in the treatment of these infections.     

Particularidades clínicas del paciente crítico con infección fúngica invasora

BackgroundInvasive fungal infection (IFI) is an entity that encompasses different types of infections caused by different types of those fungi pathogenic for humans. In the setting of critically ill patients with multiple and oftenconcurrent risk factors and comorbidities the most common are those caused by the Candida and Aspergillus species. Among the characteristics of IFI in critically ill patients, three aspects can be highlighted: those related to the host (e.g.: risk factors, clinical severity), those related with the pathogen (sensitivity, virulence), or those concerning antifungal treatment (spectrum, features PK / PD, safety, interactions). The fungus that most often causes an IFI in critically ill patients is Candida; the most common type infections are candidemia, Candida peritonitis and catheter-related infections. In recent years new antifungal treatments have expanded the therapeutic options, with echinocandins as a clear choice, often the first in the latest guidelines in critically ill patients with IFI.Case reportWe report the case of a critically ill patient having the most common risk factors, multiple organ dysfunction and development of an IFI. The complexity of establishing an antifungal treatment from the moment of its inception, its setting, and the considerations of the different therapeutic possibilities according to organ dysfunction of the patient are discussed. The antifungal treatment options mentioned in the current guidelines and recommendations are also evaluated.ConclusionsThe most common fungal infection in critically ill patients is invasive candidiasis, with candidemia or candida peritonitis being the most frequent clinical presentations. Candins have brought new possibilities for treating these complex patients due to their good safety profile and clinical efficacy.     

Antifungals discovery: an insight into new strategies to combat antifungal resistance

Undeniably, new antifungal treatments are necessary against pathogenic fungi. Fungal infections have significantly increased in recent decades, being highlighted as important causes of morbidity and mortality, particularly in immunocompromised patients. Five main antifungal classes are used: (i) azoles, (ii) echinocandins, (iii) polyenes, (iv) allylamines and (v) pyrimidine analogues. Moreover, the treatment of mycoses has several limitations, such as undesirable side effects, narrow activity spectrum, a small number of targets and fungal resistance, which are still of major concern in clinical practice. The discovery of new antifungals is mostly achieved by the screening of natural or synthetic/semisynthetic chemical compounds. The most recent discoveries in drug resistance mechanism and their avoidance were explored in a review, focusing on different antifungal targets, as well as new agents or strategies, such as combination therapy, that could improve antifungal therapy.

Significance and Impact of the Study

The failure to respond to antifungal therapy is complex and is associated with microbiological resistance and increased expression of virulence in fungal pathogens. Thus, this review offers an overview of current challenges in the treatment of fungal infections associated with increased antifungal drug resistance and the formation of biofilms in these opportunistic pathogens. Furthermore, the most recent and potential strategies to combat fungal pathogens are explored here, focusing on new agents as well as innovative approaches, such as combination therapy between antifungal drugs or with natural compounds.     

Update on Antifungal Resistance and its Clinical Impact

Candida and Aspergillus species are important causes of opportunistic infection in an ever-growing number of vulnerable patients, and these infections are associated with high mortality. This has partly been attributed to the emerging resistance of pathogenic fungi to antifungal therapy, which potentially compromises the management of infected patients. Multi-azole resistance of Aspergillus fumigatus is a current health problem, as well as is the co-resistance of Candida glabrata to both azoles and echinocandins. In most cases, negative clinical consequences of reduced in vitro fungal susceptibility to azoles and/or echinocandins can be traced to acquisition of particular resistance mechanisms. While strategies using antifungal combinations or adjunctive agents that maximize the efficacy of existing antifungals may limit treatment failures, new therapeutic approaches, including antifungal agents with novel mechanisms of action, are urgent. In the meantime, more efforts should be devoted to close monitoring of antifungal resistance and its evolution in the clinical setting.     

Combination antifungal therapy: From bench to bedside

Invasive fungal infections are major causes of mortality in immunocompromised patients. Despite improved outcomes with new antifungals, there remains a pressing need to further improve outcomes, especially with invasive aspergillosis and other invasive mold infections. Combination antifungal therapy is an attractive option that offers the prospect for improved efficacy, decreased toxicity, reduced likelihood for the emergence of resistance, and shorter courses of therapy. The current available evidence regarding the role of combination antifungal therapy for invasive fungal infections is discussed in this article, including data from in vitro studies, animal models, and human clinical trials to try to clarify this important issue. Randomized, prospective clinical trials are urgently needed, especially for invasive aspergillosis.     

The fungal cell wall as a target for the development of new antifungal therapies

In the past three decades invasive mycoses have globally emerged as a persistent source of healthcare-associated infections. The cell wall surrounding the fungal cell opposes the turgor pressure that otherwise could produce cell lysis. Thus, the cell wall is essential for maintaining fungal cell shape and integrity. Given that this structure is absent in host mammalian cells, it stands as an important target when developing selective compounds for the treatment of fungal infections. Consequently, treatment with echinocandins, a family of antifungal agents that specifically inhibits the biosynthesis of cell wall (1-3)β-D-glucan, has been established as an alternative and effective antifungal therapy. However, the existence of many pathogenic fungi resistant to single or multiple antifungal families, together with the limited arsenal of available antifungal compounds, critically affects the effectiveness of treatments against these life-threatening infections. Thus, new antifungal therapies are required. Here we review the fungal cell wall and its relevance in biotechnology as a target for the development of new antifungal compounds, disclosing the most promising cell wall inhibitors that are currently in experimental or clinical development for the treatment of some invasive mycoses.     

Recent Studies on Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children and Adolescents: an Update

The improved survival of fragile pediatric hosts such as those afflicted with primary or acquired immune deficiencies, prematurity, and surgical pathology – mainly gastrointestinal and trauma – has resulted in an increased number of children susceptible to invasive fungal infections. These infections are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Newer, safer antifungal agents allow for preventive and empiric strategies in the management of patients at risk, such as premature infants, patients receiving chemotherapy, and bone marrow or solid-organ transplant recipients. Improved radiological and molecular techniques result in earlier diagnosis of fungal infections, allowing for preemptive therapy in these patients, minimizing exposure to antifungal agents and the risk of emergence of resistant fungal strains. A better understanding of the differences in pharmacokinetics between children and adults will allow for better utilization of existing antifungal agents and improved outcomes.     

Molecular targeted treatments for fungal infections: the role of drug combinations

Invasive mycoses are associated with a high mortality rate, and their incidence is increased in immunologically deficient patients. From a diagnostic and therapeutic perspective, these infections represent a significant challenge to medicine. In addition to new antifungal agents, drug combinations are an important therapeutic resource, which might be exploited clinically, owing to the multiplicity of fungal targets against which currently available agents are active. In this review, we examine the experimental data regarding the combination of conventional antifungal agents with cytokines, antibacterial agents, calcineurin inhibitors and drugs under development characterized by novel mechanisms of action.     

Novel antifungal agents,targets or therapeutic strategies for the treatment of invasive fungal diseases: a review of the literature (2005-2009)

BackgroundThe incidence and prevalence of serious mycoses continues to be a public health problem. Despite aggressive treatment with new or more established licensed antifungal agents, these infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients.AimsTo critically review the literature regarding important new developments in the field of antifungal therapy both in the English and Spanish versions.MethodsThe search of the literature focused on different antifungal targets or mechanisms of action as well as new agents or strategies that could improve antifungal therapy.ResultsThe review produced a huge amount of information on the use of virulent factors such as growth, filamentation, pathogen tissue clearance, among others, as putative targets of antifungal activity. More recently, the chemical-genetic relationships for licensed agents as well as for other compounds have been provided by the identification of the genes related to the mechanism of action.ConclusionsAlthough the antifungal activity of numerous compounds has been examined, most of them are at the in vitro or animal models of efficacy stages. Therefore, further investigation should be carried out to realize the true clinical utility of these compounds.