Brain evolution and development: adaptation,allometry and constraint

Phenotypic traits are products of two processes: evolution and development. But how do these processes combine to produce integrated phenotypes? Comparative studies identify consistent patterns of covariation, or allometries, between brain and body size, and between brain components, indicating the presence of significant constraints limiting independent evolution of separate parts. These constraints are poorly understood, but in principle could be either developmental or functional. The developmental constraints hypothesis suggests that individual components (brain and body size, or individual brain components) tend to evolve together because natural selection operates on relatively simple developmental mechanisms that affect the growth of all parts in a concerted manner. The functional constraints hypothesis suggests that correlated change reflects the action of selection on distributed functional systems connecting the different sub-components, predicting more complex patterns of mosaic change at the level of the functional systems and more complex genetic and developmental mechanisms. These hypotheses are not mutually exclusive but make different predictions. We review recent genetic and neurodevelopmental evidence, concluding that functional rather than developmental constraints are the main cause of the observed patterns.     

Many-to-Many Mapping of Phenotype to Performance: An Extension of the F-Matrix for Studying Functional Complexity

Performance capacity influences ecology, behavior and fitness, and is determined by the underlying phenotype. The phenotype-performance relationship can influence the evolutionary trajectory of an organism. Several types of phenotype-performance relationships have been described, including one-to-one relationships between a single phenotypic trait and performance measure, trade-offs and facilitations between a phenotypic trait and multiple performance measures, and redundancies between multiple phenotypic traits and a single performance measure. The F-matrix is an intraspecific matrix of measures of statistical association between phenotype and performance that is used to quantify these relationships. We extend the F-matrix in two ways. First, we use the F-matrix to describe how the different phenotype-performance relationships occur simultaneously and interact in functional systems, a phenomenon we call many-to-many mapping. Second, we develop methods to compare F-matrices among species and compare phenotype-performance relationships at microevolutionary and macroevolutionary levels. We demonstrate the expanded F-matrix approach with a dataset of eight phrynosomatine lizard species, including six phenotypic traits and two measures of locomotor performance. Our results suggest that all types of relationships occur in this system and that phenotypic traits involved in trade-offs are more functionally constrained and tend evolve slower interspecifically than those involved in facilitations or one-to-one relationships.     

Malagasy cichlids differentially limit impacts of body shape evolution on oral jaw functional morphology

Patterns of trait covariation, such as integration and modularity, are vital factors that influence the evolution of vertebrate body plans. In functional systems, decoupling of morphological modules buffers functional change in one trait by reducing correlated variation with another. However, for complex morphologies with many‐to‐one mapping of form to function (MTOM), resistance to functional change may also be achieved by constraining morphological variation within a functionally stable region of morphospace. For this research, we used geometric morphometrics to evaluate the evolution of body shape and its relationship with jaw functional morphology in two independent radiations of endemic Malagasy cichlid (Teleostei: Cichlidae). Our results suggested that the two subfamilies used different strategies to mitigate impacts of body shape variation on a metric of jaw function, maxillary kinematic transmission (MKT): (1) modularity between cranial and postcranial morphologies, and (2) integration of body and jaw evolution, with jaw morphologies varying in a manner that limits change in MKT. This research shows that, unlike modularity, MTOM allows traits to retain strong evolutionary covariation while still reducing impacts on functionality. These results suggest that MTOM, and its influence on the evolution of correlated traits, is likely much more widespread than is currently understood.     

Many‐to‐one form‐to‐function mapping weakens parallel morphological evolution

Evolutionary ecologists aim to explain and predict evolutionary change under different selective regimes. Theory suggests that such evolutionary prediction should be more difficult for biomechanical systems in which different trait combinations generate the same functional output: “many‐to‐one mapping.” Many‐to‐one mapping of phenotype to function enables multiple morphological solutions to meet the same adaptive challenges. Therefore, many‐to‐one mapping should undermine parallel morphological evolution, and hence evolutionary predictability, even when selection pressures are shared among populations. Studying 16 replicate pairs of lake‐ and stream‐adapted threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), we quantified three parts of the teleost feeding apparatus and used biomechanical models to calculate their expected functional outputs. The three feeding structures differed in their form‐to‐function relationship from one‐to‐one (lower jaw lever ratio) to increasingly many‐to‐one (buccal suction index, opercular 4‐bar linkage). We tested for (1) weaker linear correlations between phenotype and calculated function, and (2) less parallel evolution across lake‐stream pairs, in the many‐to‐one systems relative to the one‐to‐one system. We confirm both predictions, thus supporting the theoretical expectation that increasing many‐to‐one mapping undermines parallel evolution. Therefore, sole consideration of morphological variation within and among populations might not serve as a proxy for functional variation when multiple adaptive trait combinations exist.     

EARLY BURSTS OF BODY SIZE AND SHAPE EVOLUTION ARE RARE IN COMPARATIVE DATA

George Gaylord Simpson famously postulated that much of life's diversity originated as adaptive radiations—more or less simultaneous divergences of numerous lines from a single ancestral adaptive type. However, identifying adaptive radiations has proven difficult due to a lack of broad‐scale comparative datasets. Here, we use phylogenetic comparative data on body size and shape in a diversity of animal clades to test a key model of adaptive radiation, in which initially rapid morphological evolution is followed by relative stasis. We compared the fit of this model to both single selective peak and random walk models. We found little support for the early‐burst model of adaptive radiation, whereas both other models, particularly that of selective peaks, were commonly supported. In addition, we found that the net rate of morphological evolution varied inversely with clade age. The youngest clades appear to evolve most rapidly because long‐term change typically does not attain the amount of divergence predicted from rates measured over short time scales. Across our entire analysis, the dominant pattern was one of constraints shaping evolution continually through time rather than rapid evolution followed by stasis. We suggest that the classical model of adaptive radiation, where morphological evolution is initially rapid and slows through time, may be rare in comparative data.     

Functional complexity can mitigate performance trade-offs

Trade-offs are believed to impose major constraints on adaptive evolution, and they arise when modification of a trait improves one aspect of performance but incurs a cost in another. Here we show that performance costs that result from competing demands on one trait can be mitigated by compensatory changes in other traits, so long as performance has a complex basis. Numerical simulations indicate that increases in the number of traits that determine performance decrease the strength of performance trade-offs. In centrarchid fishes, multiple traits underlie suction feeding performance, and experimental data and hydrodynamic modeling show that combinations of traits evolve to increase the ability to feed on attached prey while mitigating costs to performance on evasive prey. Diet data for centrarchid species reveal a weak trade-off between these prey types, corroborating the results based on hydrodynamic modeling and suggesting that complexity in the functional basis of suction feeding performance enhances trophic diversification. Complexity may thus permit the evolution of combinations of high-performance behaviors that appear to violate underlying trade-offs, such as the ability to exert high suction forces with large gape. This phenomenon may promote morphological, functional, and ecological diversification in the face of the myriad selective demands organisms encounter.     

Evolutionary consequences of many-to-one mapping of jaw morphology to mechanics in labrid fishes

Many physiological traits consist of two hierarchically related levels: physical structures and the emergent functional properties of those structures. Because selection tends to act on the emergent functional traits, the evolution of structural phenotypes will depend on the nature of the form-function relationship. Complex physiological or biomechanical traits are often characterized by many-to-one mapping: numerous structural phenotypes can yield equivalent functions. We suggest that this redundancy can promote the evolution of phenotypic diversity, and we illustrate this effect with a combination of empirical and analytical studies of a complex biomechanical trait, the four-bar linkage found in the jaws of labrid fishes. We show that labrid jaws are subject to many-to-one mapping of form-to-jaw mechanical properties but that some mechanical types have higher levels of morphological redundancy than others. This variation in redundancy has affected the diversity and distribution of labrid jaw shapes: labrid species are disproportionately concentrated around functional traits with higher potential for redundancy. Many-to-one mapping can also mitigate evolutionary constraints imposed by mechanical trade-offs by allowing a species to simultaneously optimize multiple functional properties. Many-to-one mapping may be an important factor in generating the uneven patterns of diversity in physiological traits.     

ELEVATED RATES OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND FUNCTIONAL DIVERSIFICATION IN REEF‐DWELLING HAEMULID FISHES

The relationship between habitat complexity and species richness is well established but comparatively little is known about the evolution of morphological diversity in complex habitats. Reefs are structurally complex, highly productive shallow‐water marine ecosystems found in tropical (coral reefs) and temperate zones (rocky reefs) that harbor exceptional levels of biodiversity. We investigated whether reef habitats promote the evolution of morphological diversity in the feeding and locomotion systems of grunts (Haemulidae), a group of predominantly nocturnal fishes that live on both temperate and tropical reefs. Using phylogenetic comparative methods and statistical analyses that take into account uncertainty in phylogeny and the evolutionary history of reef living, we demonstrate that rates of morphological evolution are faster in reef‐dwelling haemulids. The magnitude of this effect depends on the type of trait; on average, traits involved in the functional systems for prey capture and processing evolve twice as fast on reefs as locomotor traits. This result, along with the observation that haemulids do not exploit unique feeding niches on reefs, suggests that fine‐scale trophic niche partitioning and character displacement may be driving higher rates of morphological evolution. Whatever the cause, there is growing evidence that reef habitats stimulate morphological and functional diversification in teleost fishes.     

The evolution of trade-offs: effects of inbreeding on fecundity relationships in the cricket Gryllus firmus

The evolution of traits is modulated by their interrelationships with each other, particularly when those relationships result in a fitness trade-off. In this paper we explore the consequences of genetic architecture on functional relationships between traits. Specifically, we address the consequences of inbreeding on these relationships. We show that the linear regression between two traits will not be affected if there is no dominance genetic variance in either trait, whereas the intercept but not the slope of the regression will change if there is dominance genetic variance in one trait only. We test the latter hypothesis using fecundity relationships in the cricket Gryllus firmus. Data from pedigree analysis and an inbreeding experiment show that there is significant dominance genetic variance in fecundity, but not head width (an index of body size) or dorsal longitudinal muscle (DLM) mass. Fecundity increases with head width, but decreases with DLM mass. As predicted, the intercepts of the regressions of fecundity on these two morphological traits decrease with inbreeding, but there is little or no change in slope. Gryllus firmus is wing dimorphic, with the macropterous (LW) morph having a lower fecundity than the micropterous (SW) morph. We hypothesize that the difference in fecundity arises primarily because of a competition for resources in the LW females between DLM maintenance (i.e., mass) and egg production. As a consequence, we predict that the fecundity within each morph should decline linearly with the inbreeding coefficient at the same rate in both morphs. The result of this will be a change in the relative fitness of the two morphs, that of the SW morph increasing with inbreeding. This prediction is supported. These results indicate that trade-offs will evolve and such changes will affect evolutionary trajectories by altering the pattern of relationships among fitness components.     

Protein deprivation facilitates the independent evolution of behavior and morphology

Ecological conditions such as nutrition can change genetic covariances between traits and accelerate or slow down trait evolution. As adaptive trait correlations can become maladaptive following rapid environmental change, poor or stressful environments are expected to weaken genetic covariances, thereby increasing the opportunity for independent evolution of traits. Here, we demonstrate the differences in genetic covariance among multiple behavioral and morphological traits (exploration, aggression, and body weight) between southern field crickets (Gryllus bimaculatus) raised in favorable (free‐choice) versus stressful (protein‐deprived) nutritional environments. We also quantify the extent to which differences in genetic covariance structures contribute to the potential for the independent evolution of these traits. We demonstrate that protein‐deprived environments tend to increase the potential for traits to evolve independently, which is caused by genetic covariances that are significantly weaker for crickets raised on protein‐deprived versus free‐choice diets. The weakening effects of stressful environments on genetic covariances tended to be stronger in males than in females. The weakening of the genetic covariance between traits under stressful nutritional environments was expected to facilitate the opportunity for adaptive evolution across generations. Therefore, the multivariate gene‐by‐environment interactions revealed here may facilitate behavioral and morphological adaptations to rapid environmental change.     

Omnivory in lacertid lizards: adaptive evolution or constraint?

Feeding specializations such as herbivory are an often cited example of convergent and adaptive evolution. However, some groups such as lizards appear constrained in the evolution of morphological specializations associated with specialized diets. Here we examine whether the inclusion of plant matter into the diet of omnivorous lacertid lizards has resulted in morphological specializations and whether these specializations reflect biomechanical compromises as expected if omnivores are constrained by functional trade-offs. We examined external head shape, skull shape, tooth structure, intestinal tract length and bite performance as previous studies have suggested correlations between the inclusion of plants into the diet and these traits. Our data show that omnivorous lacertid lizards possess modifications of these traits that allow them to successfully exploit plant material as a food source. Conversely, few indications of a compromise phenotype could be detected, suggesting that the evolution towards herbivory is only mildly constrained by functional trade-offs.     

Genotype to phenotype: physiological control of trait size and scaling in insects

For almost a century, biologists have used trait scaling relationships(bi-variate scatter-plots of trait size versus body size) tocharacterize phenotypic variation within populations, and tocompare animal shape across populations or species. Scalingrelationships are a popular metric because they have long beenthought to reflect underlying patterns of trait growth and development.However, the physiological mechanisms generating animal scalingare not well understood, and it is not yet clear how scalingrelationships evolve. Here we review recent advances in developmentalbiology, genetics, and physiology as they pertain to the controlof growth of adult body parts in insects. We summarize fourmechanisms known to influence either the rate or the durationof cell proliferation within developing structures, and suggesthow mutations in these mechanisms could affect the relativesizes of adult body parts. By reviewing what is known aboutthese four processes, and illustrating how they may contributeto patterns of trait scaling, we reveal genetic mechanisms likelyto be involved in the evolution of insect form.     

Hominin Obstetrics and the Evolution of Constraints

Birth is significantly more complicated and dangerous in modern humans than in other great apes. This disparity is often hypothesized to be the result of evolutionary constraints on obstetric dimensions related to bipedalism and/or thermoregulation in later hominins. Previous attempts to test such hypotheses have used biomechanical methods and results have been mixed. But evolutionary constraints, restrictions or limitations on the course or outcome of evolution, are the result of an interaction between selective pressures and genetic constraints—the latter revealed in patterns of integration. Integration between traits can result in directional or stabilizing selection on one trait leading to correlated responses in other traits, which can bias and constrain evolutionary trajectories. Therefore, trait evolution may be constrained for reasons separate from those that can be estimated using biomechanical models, and to study evolutionary constraints it is necessary to understand the role genetic constraints play in morphological change. The results presented here show that genetic constraints can significantly reduce the evolutionary potential of the birth canal to evolve in humans, apes, and likely earlier hominins, but also point to an overall reduction in the level of constraints during hominin evolution. These findings suggest that divergent selection pressures for obstetric requirements and other pelvic functions in hominins reduced levels of genetic constraint on birth canal evolution, likely lowering the amount of time needed for evolutionary change, and permitting morphological evolution along a trajectory that might have previously been difficult or impossible to traverse.     

Consequences of hierarchical allocation for the evolution of life-history traits

Resource allocation within individuals may often be hierarchical, and this may have important effects on genetic correlations and on trait evolution. For example, organisms may divide energy between reproduction and somatic growth and then subdivide reproductive resources. Genetic variation in allocation to pathways early in such hierarchies (e.g., reproduction) can cause positive genetic correlations between traits that trade off (e.g., offspring size and number) because some individuals invest more resources in reproduction than others. We used quantitative-genetic models to explore the evolutionary implications of allocation hierarchies. Our results showed that when variation in allocation early in the hierarchy exceeds subsequent variation in allocation, genetic covariances and initial responses to selection do not reflect trade-offs occurring at later levels in the hierarchy. This general pattern was evident for many starting allocations and optima and for whether traits contributed multiplicatively or additively to fitness. Finally, artificial selection on a single trait revealed masked trade-offs when variation in early allocation was comparable to subsequent variation in allocation. This result confirms artificial selection as a powerful, but not foolproof, method of detecting trade-offs. Thus, allocation hierarchies can profoundly affect life-history evolution by causing traits to evolve in the opposite direction to that predicted by trade-offs.     

LEVERS AND LINKAGES: MECHANICAL TRADE‐OFFS IN A POWER‐AMPLIFIED SYSTEM

Mechanical redundancy within a biomechanical system (e.g., many‐to‐one mapping) allows morphologically divergent organisms to maintain equivalent mechanical outputs. However, most organisms depend on the integration of more than one biomechanical system. Here, we test whether coupled mechanical systems follow a pattern of amplification (mechanical changes are congruent and evolve toward the same functional extreme) or independence (mechanisms evolve independently). We examined the correlated evolution and evolutionary pathways of the coupled four‐bar linkage and lever systems in mantis shrimp (Stomatopoda) ultrafast raptorial appendages. We examined models of character evolution in the framework of two divergent groups of stomatopods—“smashers” (hammer‐shaped appendages) and “spearers” (bladed appendages). Smashers tended to evolve toward force amplification, whereas spearers evolved toward displacement amplification. These findings show that coupled biomechanical systems can evolve synergistically, thereby resulting in functional amplification rather than mechanical redundancy.     

Tipping the scales: Evolution of the allometric slope independent of average trait size

The scaling of body parts is central to the expression of morphology across body sizes and to the generation of morphological diversity within and among species. Although patterns of scaling‐relationship evolution have been well documented for over one hundred years, little is known regarding how selection acts to generate these patterns. In part, this is because it is unclear the extent to which the elements of log‐linear scaling relationships—the intercept or mean trait size and the slope—can evolve independently. Here, using the wing–body size scaling relationship in Drosophila melanogaster as an empirical model, we use artificial selection to demonstrate that the slope of a morphological scaling relationship between an organ (the wing) and body size can evolve independently of mean organ or body size. We discuss our findings in the context of how selection likely operates on morphological scaling relationships in nature, the developmental basis for evolved changes in scaling, and the general approach of using individual‐based selection experiments to study the expression and evolution of morphological scaling.     

Perspectives on the genetic architecture of divergence in body shape in sticklebacks

The body shape of fishes encompasses a number of morphological traits that are intrinsically linked to functional systems and affect various measures of performance, including swimming, feeding, and avoiding predators. Changes in shape can allow a species to exploit a new ecological niche and can lead to ecological speciation. Body shape results from the integration of morphological, behavioral and physiological traits. It has been well established that functional interdependency among traits plays a large role in constraining the evolution of shape, affecting both the speed and the repeated evolution of particular body shapes. However, it is less clear what role genetic or developmental constraints might play in biasing the rate or direction of the evolution of body shape. Here, we suggest that the threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus) is a powerful model system in which to address the extent to which genetic or developmental constraints play a role in the evolution of body shape in fishes. We review the existing data that begins to address these issues in sticklebacks and provide suggestions for future areas of research that will be particularly fruitful for illuminating the mechanisms that contribute to the evolution of body shape in fishes.     

Functional diversity of small-mammal postcrania is linked to both substrate preference and body size

Selective pressures favor morphologies that are adapted to distinct ecologies, resulting in trait partitioning among ecomorphotypes. However, the effects of these selective pressures vary across taxa, especially because morphology is also influenced by factors such as phylogeny, body size, and functional trade-offs. In this study, we examine how these factors impact functional diversification in mammals. It has been proposed that trait partitioning among mammalian ecomorphotypes is less pronounced at small body sizes due to biomechanical, energetic, and environmental factors that favor a “generalist” body plan, whereas larger taxa exhibit more substantial functional adaptations. We title this the Divergence Hypothesis (DH) because it predicts greater morphological divergence among ecomorphotypes at larger body sizes. We test DH by using phylogenetic comparative methods to examine the postcranial skeletons of 129 species of taxonomically diverse, small-to-medium-sized (<15 kg) mammals, which we categorize as either “tree-dwellers” or “ground-dwellers.” In some analyses, the morphologies of ground-dwellers and tree-dwellers suggest greater between-group differentiation at larger sizes, providing some evidence for DH. However, this trend is neither particularly strong nor supported by all analyses. Instead, a more pronounced pattern emerges that is distinct from the predictions of DH: within-group phenotypic disparity increases with body size in both ground-dwellers and tree-dwellers, driven by morphological outliers among “medium”-sized mammals. Thus, evolutionary increases in body size are more closely linked to increases in within-locomotor-group disparity than to increases in between-group disparity. We discuss biomechanical and ecological factors that may drive these evolutionary patterns, and we emphasize the significant evolutionary influences of ecology and body size on phenotypic diversity.     

MODULARITY AND RATES OF EVOLUTIONARY CHANGE IN A POWER‐AMPLIFIED PREY CAPTURE SYSTEM

The dynamic interplay among structure, function, and phylogeny form a classic triad of influences on the patterns and processes of biological diversification. Although these dynamics are widely recognized as important, quantitative analyses of their interactions have infrequently been applied to biomechanical systems. Here we analyze these factors using a fundamental biomechanical mechanism: power amplification. Power‐amplified systems use springs and latches to generate extremely fast and powerful movements. This study focuses specifically on the power amplification mechanism in the fast raptorial appendages of mantis shrimp (Crustacea: Stomatopoda). Using geometric morphometric and phylogenetic comparative analyses, we measured evolutionary modularity and rates of morphological evolution of the raptorial appendage's biomechanical components. We found that “smashers” (hammer‐shaped raptorial appendages) exhibit lower modularity and 10‐fold slower rates of morphological change when compared to non‐smashers (spear‐shaped or undifferentiated appendages). The morphological and biomechanical integration of this system at a macroevolutionary scale and the presence of variable rates of evolution reveal a balance between structural constraints, functional variation, and the “roles of development and genetics” in evolutionary diversification.     

Multi-trait Selection, Adaptation, and Constraints on the Evolution of Burst Swimming Performance

Whole organism performance represents the integration of numerousphysiological, morphological, and behavioral traits. How adaptivechanges in performance evolve therefore requires an understandingof how selection acts on multiple integrated traits. Two approachesthat lend themselves to studying the evolution of performancein natural populations are the use of quantitative geneticsmodels for estimating the strength of selection acting on multiplequantitative traits and ecological genetic comparisons of populationsexhibiting phenotypic differences correlated with environmentalvariation. In both cases, the ultimate goal is to understandhow suites of traits and trade-offs between competing functionsrespond to natural selection. Here we consider how these twocomplimentary approaches can be applied to study the adaptiveevolution of escape performance in fish. We first present anextension of Arnold's (1983) quantitative genetic approach thatexplicitly considers how trade-offs between different componentsof performance interact with the underlying genetics. We proposethat such a model can reveal the conditions under which multipleselection pressures will cause adaptive change in traits thatinfluence more than one component of fitness. We then reviewwork on the Atlantic silversides and Trinidadian guppies astwo case studies where an ecological genetics approach has beensuccessfully applied to evaluate how the evolution of escapeperformance trades-off with other components of fitness. Weconclude with the general lesson that whole organism performanceis embedded in a complex phenotype, and that the net outcomeof selection acting on different aspects of the organism willoften result in a compromise among competing influences.