Structure, function, and wavelength selection in blue-absorbing proteorhodopsin

The absorption maximum of blue proteorhodopsin (BPR) is the most blue-shifted of all retinal proteins found in archaea or bacteria, with the exception of sensory rhodopsin II (SRII). The absorption spectrum also exhibits a pH dependence larger than any other retinal protein. We examine the structural origins of these two properties of BPR by using optical spectroscopy, homology modeling, and molecular orbital theory. Bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and SRII are used as homology parents for comparative purposes. We find that the tertiary structure of BPR based on SRII is more realistic with respect to free energy, dynamic stability, and spectroscopic properties. Molecular orbital calculations including full single- and double-configuration interaction within the chromophore pi-electron system provide perspectives on the wavelength regulation in this protein and indicate that Arg-95, Gln-106, Glu-143, and Asp-229 play important, and in some cases pH-dependent roles. A possible model for the 0.22 eV red shift of BPR at low pH is examined, in which Glu-143 becomes protonated and releases Arg-95 to rotate up into the binding site, altering the electrostatic environment of the chromophore. At high pH, BPR has spectroscopic properties similar to SRII, but at low pH, BPR has spectroscopic properties more similar to BR. Nevertheless, SRII is a significantly better homology model for BPR and opens up the question of whether this protein serves as a proton pump, as commonly believed, or is a light sensor with structure-function properties more comparable to those of SRII. The function of BPR in the native organism is discussed with reference to the results of the homology model.     

Active state of sensory rhodopsin II: structural determinants for signal transfer and proton pumping

The molecular mechanism of transmembrane signal transduction is still a pertinent question in cellular biology. Generally, a receptor can transfer an external signal via its cytoplasmic surface, as found for G-protein-coupled receptors such as rhodopsin, or via the membrane domain, such as that in sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) in complex with its transducer, HtrII. In the absence of HtrII, SRII functions as a proton pump. Here, we report on the crystal structure of the active state of uncomplexed SRII from Natronomonas pharaonis, NpSRII. The problem with a dramatic loss of diffraction quality upon loading of the active state was overcome by growing better crystals and by reducing the occupancy of the state. The conformational changes in the region comprising helices F and G are similar to those observed for the NpSRII-transducer complex but are much more pronounced. The meaning of these differences for the understanding of proton pumping and signal transduction by NpSRII is discussed.     

Structural characteristics around the β-ionone ring of the retinal chromophore in Salinibacter sensory rhodopsin I

Organisms sense and respond to environmental stimuli through membrane-embedded receptors and transducers. Sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) and sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) are the photoreceptors for the positive and negative phototaxis in microorganisms, respectively. They form signaling complexes in the membrane with their cognate transducer proteins, HtrI and HtrII, and these SRI-HtrI and SRII-HtrII complexes transmit a light signal through their cytoplasmic sensory signaling system, inducing opposite effects (i.e., the inactivation or activation of the kinase CheA). Here we found, by using Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy, that a conserved residue, Asp102 in Salinibacter SRI (SrSRI), which is located close to the β-ionone ring of the retinal chromophore, is deprotonated upon formation of the active M-intermediate. Furthermore, the D102E mutant of SrSRI affects the structure and/or structural changes of Cys130. This mutant shows a large spectral shift and is comparably unstable, especially in the absence of Cl(-). These phenomena have not been observed in the wild-type, or the N105Q and N105D mutants of Natronomonas pharaonis SRII (NpSRII), indicating differences in the structure and structural changes between SrSRI and NpSRII around the β-ionone ring. These differences could also be supported by the measurements of the reactivity with the water-soluble reagent azide. On the basis of these results, we discuss the structure and structural changes around the retinal chromophore in SrSRI.     

Electrostatic potential at the retinal of three archaeal rhodopsins: implications for their different absorption spectra

The color tuning mechanism of the rhodopsin protein family has been in the focus of research for decades. However, the structural basis of the tuning mechanism in general and of the absorption shift between rhodopsins in particular remains under discussion. It is clear that a major determinant for spectral shifts between different rhodopsins are electrostatic interactions between the chromophore retinal and the protein. Based on the Poisson-Boltzmann equation, we computed and compared the electrostatic potential at the retinal of three archaeal rhodopsins: bacteriorhodopsin (BR), halorhodopsin (HR), and sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) for which high-resolution structures are available. These proteins are an excellent test case for understanding the spectral tuning of retinal. The absorption maxima of BR and HR are very similar, whereas the spectrum of SRII is considerably blue shifted--despite the structural similarity between these three proteins. In agreement with their absorption maxima, we find that the electrostatic potential is similar in BR and HR, whereas significant differences are seen for SRII. The decomposition of the electrostatic potential into contributions of individual residues, allowed us to identify seven residues that are responsible for the differences in electrostatic potential between the proteins. Three of these residues are located in the retinal binding pocket and have in fact been shown to account for part of the absorption shift between BR and SRII by mutational studies. One residue is located close to the beta-ionone ring of retinal and the remaining three residues are more than 8 A away from the retinal. These residues have not been discussed before, because they are, partly because of their location, no obvious candidates for the spectral shift among BR, HR, and SRII. However, their contribution to the differences in electrostatic potential is evident. The counterion of the Schiff base, which is frequently discussed to be involved in the spectral tuning, does not contribute to the dissimilarities between the electrostatic potentials.     

Deprotonation of the Schiff base of bacteriorhodopsin is obligate in light-induced proton pumping

Bacteriorhodopsin (bR) in purple membranes was permethylated with formaldehyde and pyridine-borane with the incorporation of approximately 12 methyl groups. This new pigment, PMbR, absorbed light in the dark-adapted state with a lambda max at 558 nm, virtually the same as that of bR. Light adaptation of PMbR produced a lambda max of 564 nm with a slightly elevated epsilon. Similar changes occurred with bR. When incorporated into asolectin vesicles, PMbR was able to pump protons in the light with an efficiency similar to that of bR itself. Bleaching of PMbR exposed its active site lysine residue, which was monomethylated to form active site methylated bR (AMbR) after regeneration with all-trans-retinal. This blue pigment, which is a cyanopsin rather than a rhodopsin, showed an extraordinary red shift, absorbing light with a lambda max of 620 nm in the dark-adapted state. Light adaptation of AMbR resulted in a spectral shift to 616 nm with a decrease in epsilon. This change was completely reversible in the dark. This shift was interpreted to mean that an L-like intermediate was accumulating, as would be expected if deprotonation of the protonated Schiff base could not occur to produce the M intermediate. Furthermore, when incorporated into asolectin vesicles, AMbR proved incapable of pumping protons in the light. It was concluded from these experiments that deprotonation of the Schiff base of bR is obligate for light-induced proton pumping.     

Constitutive activity in chimeras and deletions localize sensory rhodopsin II/HtrII signal relay to the membrane-inserted domain

Halobacterium salinarum sensory rhodopsin II (HsSRII) is a phototaxis receptor for blue-light avoidance that relays signals to its tightly bound transducer HsHtrII (H. salinarum haloarchaeal transducer for SRII). We found that disruption of the salt bridge between the protonated Schiff base of the receptor's retinylidene chromophore and its counterion Asp73 by residue substitutions D73A, N or Q constitutively activates HsSRII, whereas the corresponding Asp75 counterion substitutions do not constitutively activate Natronomonas pharaonis SRII (NpSRII) when complexed with N. pharaonis haloarchaeal transducer for SRII (NpHtrII). However, NpSRII(D75Q) in complex with HsHtrII is fully constitutively active, showing that transducer sensitivity to the receptor signal contributes to the phenotype. The swimming behaviour of cells expressing chimeras exchanging portions of the two homologous transducers localizes their differing sensitivities to the HtrII transmembrane domains. Furthermore, deletion constructs show that the known contact region in the cytoplasmic domain of the NpSRII-NpHtrII complex is not required for phototaxis, excluding the domain as a site for signal transmission. These results distinguish between the prevailing models for SRII-HtrII signal relay, strongly supporting the 'steric trigger-transmembrane relay model', which proposes that retinal isomerization directly signals HtrII through the mid-membrane SRII-HtrII interface, and refuting alternative models that propose signal relay in the cytoplasmic membrane-proximal domain.     

Transducer binding establishes localized interactions to tune sensory rhodopsin II

In haloarchaea, sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) mediates a photophobic response to avoid photo-oxidative damage in bright light. Upon light activation the receptor undergoes a conformational change that activates a tightly bound transducer molecule (HtrII), which in turn by a chain of homologous reactions transmits the signal to the chemotactic eubacterial two-component system. Here, using single-molecule force spectroscopy, we localize and quantify changes to the intramolecular interactions within SRII of Natronomonas pharaonis (NpSRII) upon NpHtrII binding. Transducer binding affected the interactions at transmembrane alpha helices F and G of NpSRII to which the transducer was in contact. Remarkably, the interactions were distributed asymmetrically and significantly stabilized alpha helix G entirely but alpha helix F only at its extracellular tip. These findings provide unique insights into molecular mechanisms that "prime" the complex for signaling, and guide the receptor toward transmitting light-activated structural changes to its cognate transducer.     

Functional characterization of sensory rhodopsin II from Halobacterium salinarum expressed in Escherichia coli

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) from Halobacterium salinarum is heterologously expressed in Escherichia coli with a yield of 3-4 mg of purified SRII per liter cell culture. UV/Vis absorption spectroscopy display bands characteristic for native SRII. The resonance Raman spectrum provides evidence for a strongly hydrogen-bonded Schiff base like in mammalian rhodopsin but unlike to the homologous pSRII from Natronobacterium pharaonis. Laser flash spectroscopy indicates that SRII in detergent as well as after reconstitution into polar lipids shows its typical photochemical properties with prolonged photocycle kinetics. The first functional heterologous expression of SRII from H. salinarum provides the basis for studies with its cognate transducer HtrII to investigate the molecular processes involved in phototransduction as well as in chemotransduction.     

Salinibacter sensory rhodopsin: sensory rhodopsin I-like protein from a eubacterium

Halobacterium salinarum sensory rhodopsin I (HsSRI), a dual receptor regulating both negative and positive phototaxis in haloarchaea, transmits light signals through changes in protein-protein interactions with its transducer, halobacterial transducer protein I (HtrI). Haloarchaea also have another sensor pigment, sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), which functions as a receptor regulating negative phototaxis. Compared with HsSRI, the signal relay mechanism of SRII is well characterized because SRII from Natronomonus pharaonis (NpSRII) is much more stable than HsSRI and HsSRII, especially in dilute salt solutions and is much more resistant to detergents. Two genes encoding SRI homologs were identified from the genome sequence of the eubacterium Salinibacter ruber. Those sequences are distantly related to HsSRI ( approximately 40% identity) and contain most of the amino acid residues identified as necessary for its function. To determine whether those genes encode functional protein(s), we cloned and expressed them in Escherichia coli. One of them (SrSRI) was expressed well as a recombinant protein having all-trans retinal as a chromophore. UV-Vis, low-temperature UV-Vis, pH-titration, and flash photolysis experiments revealed that the photochemical properties of SrSRI are similar to those of HsSRI. In addition to the expression system, the high stability of SrSRI makes it possible to prepare large amounts of protein and enables studies of mutant proteins that will allow new approaches to investigate the photosignaling process of SRI-HtrI.     

Mechanism of spectral tuning in green-absorbing proteorhodopsin

The absorption spectrum of green proteorhodopsin (GPR) is pH-dependent, exhibiting either red-shifted (low pH) or blue-shifted (high pH) absorption maxima. We examine the molecular basis of the pH-dependent spectral properties of green proteorhodopsin by using homology modeling and molecular orbital theory. Bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) are compared as homology templates. The model of GPR generated by using BR as the homology parent is better than that generated by using SRII on the basis of the potential energy, relative stability to dynamics, and ability to rationalize pH effects. MNDO-PSDCI (molecular neglect of differential overlap with partial single- and double-configuration interaction) calculations provide insight into the spectroscopic properties of GPR and help rule out the viability of the SRII-based model. The proximity of His 75 to the quadrupole residues (LYR, D97, D227, and R94) in the BR-based model provides a good model for both the low- and high-pH spectral states of GPR. The observation that BR is a better structural model for GPR than SRII is in contrast to our previous study of BPR, which observed that SRII was the better homology parent [Hillebrecht, J. R. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 1579-1590]. The implications of this observation are discussed.     

The transducer protein HtrII modulates the lifetimes of sensory rhodopsin II photointermediates.

We studied the photochemical reaction cycle of sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) by flash photolysis of Halobacterium salinarum membranes genetically engineered to contain or to lack its transducer protein HtrII. Flash photolysis data from membranes containing HtrII were fit well in the 10 micros-10 s range by three rate constants and a linear unbranched pathway from the unphotolyzed state with 487 nm absorption maximum to a species with absorption maximum near 350 nm (M) followed by a species with maximum near 520 nm (O), as has been found in previous studies of wild-type membranes. Data from membranes devoid of HtrII exhibited similar M and O intermediates but with altered kinetics, and a third intermediate absorbing maximally near 470 nm (N) was present in an equilibrium mixture with O. The modulation of SRII photoreactions by HtrII indicates that SRII and HtrII are physically associated in a molecular complex. Arrhenius analysis shows that the largest effect of HtrII, the acceleration of O decay, is attributable to a large decrease in activation enthalpy. Based on comparison of SRII photoreactions to those of sensory rhodopsin I and bacteriorhodopsin, we interpret this kinetic effect to indicate that HtrII interacts with SRII so that it alters the reaction process involving deprotonation of Asp73, the proton acceptor from the Schiff base.     

Ultra-high-field MAS NMR assay of a multispin labeled ligand bound to its G-protein receptor target in the natural membrane environment: electronic structure of the retinylidene chromophore in rhodopsin

11-Z-[8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,19,20-(13)C10]Retinal prepared by total synthesis is reconstituted with opsin to form rhodopsin in the natural lipid membrane environment. The 13C shifts are assigned with magic angle spinning NMR dipolar correlation spectroscopy in a single experiment and compared with data of singly labeled retinylidene ligands in detergent-solubilized rhodopsin. The use of multispin labeling in combination with 2-D correlation spectroscopy improves the relative accuracy of the shift measurements. We have used the chemical shift data to analyze the electronic structure of the retinylidene ligand at three levels of understanding: (i) by specifying interactions between the 13C-labeled ligand and the G-protein-coupled receptor target, (ii) by making a charge assessment of the protonation of the Schiff base in rhodopsin, and (iii) by evaluating the total charge on the carbons of the retinylidene chromophore. In this way it is shown that a conjugation defect is the predominant ground-state property governing the molecular electronics of the retinylidene chromophore in rhodopsin. The cumulative chemical shifts at the odd-numbered carbons (Delta(sigma)odd) of 11-Z-protonated Schiff base models relative to the unprotonated Schiff base can be used to measure the extent of delocalization of positive charge into the polyene. For a series of 11-Z-protonated Schiff base models and rhodopsin, Delta(sigma)odd appears to correlate linearly with the frequency of maximum visible absorption. Since rhodopsin has the largest value of Delta(sigma)odd, the data contribute to existing and converging spectroscopic evidence for a complex counterion stabilizing the protonated Schiff base in the binding pocket.     

Expression of the halobacterial transducer protein HtrII from Natronomonas pharaonis in Escherichia coli

Archaeal phototaxis is mediated by sensory rhodopsins which form complexes with their cognate transducers. Whereas the receptors sensory rhodopsin I and sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) have been expressed in Escherichia coli (E. coli) only shortened fragments of HtrII from Natronomonas pharaonis (NpHtrII) are available. Here we describe the heterologous expression of full length NpHtrII which was achieved in yields of up to 0.9 mg per litre cell culture. Gel filtration analysis reveals the tendency of the transducer to form dimers and higher-order oligomers which was also observed when complexed to NpSRII. A circular dichroism (CD) spectrum of NpHtrII is comparable to those obtained for the E. coli chemoreceptors indicating a similar folding with predominantly alpha-helical structure. NpHtrII dissociates from the NpSRII/HtrII complex with an apparent K(D) of about 0.6 microM. Photocycle kinetics of the complex is comparable to that obtained for NpSRII in complex with a truncated transducer with slight differences in the M-decay. The data indicate that the heterologously expressed NpHtrII adopt a native like structure, providing the means for elucidating transmembrane signal transduction and activation of microbial signalling cascades.     

Structural changes of Salinibacter sensory rhodopsin I upon formation of the K and M photointermediates

Sensory rhodopsin I (SRI) is one of the most interesting photosensory receptors in nature because of its ability to mediate opposite signals depending on light color by photochromic one-photon and two-photon reactions. Recently, we characterized SRI from eubacterium Salinibacter ruber (SrSRI). This protein allows more detailed information about the structure and structural changes of SRI during its action to be obtained. In this paper, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy is applied to SrSRI, and the spectral changes upon formation of the K and M intermediates are compared with those of other archaeal rhodopsins, SRI from Halobacterium salinarum (HsSRI), sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), bacteriorhodopsin (BR), and halorhodopsin (HR). Spectral comparison of the hydrogen out-of-plane (HOOP) vibrations of the retinal chromophore in the K intermediates shows that extended choromophore distortion takes place in SrSRI and HsSRI, as well as in SRII, whereas the distortion is localized in the Schiff base region in BR and HR. It appears that sensor and pump functions are distinguishable from the spectral feature of HOOP modes. The HOOP band at 864 cm(-1) in SRII, important for negative phototaxis, is absent in SrSRI, suggesting differences in signal transfer mechanism between SRI and SRII. The strongly hydrogen-bound water molecule, important for proton pumps, is observed at 2172 cm(-1) in SrSRI, as well as in BR and SRII. The formation of the M intermediate accompanies the appearance of peaks at 1753 (+) and 1743 (-) cm(-1), which can be interpreted as the protonation signal of the counterion (Asp72) and the proton release signal from an unidentified carboxylic acid, respectively. The structure and structural changes of SrSRI are discussed on the basis of the present infrared spectral comparisons with other rhodopsins.     

Purple membrane: color, crystallinity, and the effect of dimethyl sulfoxide

In an effort to understand the nature of chromophore-protein interactions in bacteriorhodopsin (bR), we have reinvestigated dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-induced changes in bR [Oesterhelt et al. (1973) Eur. J. Biochem. 40, 453-463]. We observe that dark-adapted bR (bR560) in aqueous DMSO undergoes reversible transformation to a species absorbing maximally at 480 nm (bR480). Beginning at 40% DMSO, this change results in complete conversion to bR480 at 60% DMSO. The kinetics of the reaction reveal that this transformation takes place predominantly through the all-trans isomeric form of the pigment. Thermal isomerization of the 13-cis chromophore to the all-trans form is, therefore, the rate-limiting step in the formation of bR480 from the dark-adapted bR. As in native bR, the chromophore in bR480 is linked to the protein via a protonated Schiff base, and its isomeric composition is predominantly all-trans. The formation of bR480 is associated with minor changes in the protein secondary structure, and the membrane retains crystallinity. These changes in the protein structure result in a diminished chromophore-protein interaction near the Schiff base region in bR480. Thus, we attribute the observed spectroscopic changes in bR in DMSO to structural alteration of the protein. The 13-cis chromophoric pigment appears to be resistant to this solvent-induced change. The changes in the protein structure need not be very large; displacement of the protein counterion(s) to the Schiff base, resulting from minor changes in the protein structure, can produce the observed spectral shift.     

Role of Arg-72 of pharaonis Phoborhodopsin (sensory rhodopsin II) on its photochemistry

Pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR, or pharaonis sensory rhodopsin II, NpsRII) is a sensor for the negative phototaxis of Natronomonas (Natronobacterium) pharaonis. Arginine 72 of ppR corresponds to Arg-82 of bacteriorhodopsin, which is a highly conserved residue among microbial rhodopsins. Using various Arg-72 ppR mutants, we obtained the following results: 1). Arg-72(ppR) together possibly with Asp-193 influenced the pK(a) of the counterion of the protonated Schiff base. 2). The M-rise became approximately four times faster than the wild-type. 3). Illumination causes proton uptake and release, and the pH profiles of the sequence of these two proton movements were different between R72A mutant and the wild-type; it is inferred that Arg-72 connects the proton transfer events occurring at both the Schiff base and an extracellular proton-releasing residue (Asp-193). 4). The M-decays of Arg-72 mutants were faster ( approximately 8-27 folds at pH 8 depending on mutants) than the wild-type, implying that the guanidinium prevents the proton transfer from the extracellular space to the deprotonated Schiff base. 5), The proton-pumping activities were decreased for mutants having increased M-decay rates, but the extent of the decrease was smaller than expected. The role of Arg-72 of ppR on the photochemistry was discussed.     

The photobleaching sequence of a short-wavelength visual pigment.

The photobleaching pathway of a short-wavelength cone opsin purified in delipidated form (lambda(max) = 425 nm) is reported. The batho intermediate of the violet cone opsin generated at 45 K has an absorption maximum at 450 nm. The batho intermediate thermally decays to the lumi intermediate (lambda(max) = 435 nm) at 200 K. The lumi intermediate decays to the meta I (lambda(max) = 420 nm) and meta II (lambda(max) = 388 nm) intermediates at 258 and 263 K, respectively. The meta II intermediate decays to free retinal and opsin at >270 K. At 45, 75, and 140 K, the photochemical excitation of the violet cone opsin at 425 nm generates the batho intermediate at high concentrations under moderate illumination. The batho intermediate spectra, generated via decomposing the photostationary state spectra at 45 and 140 K, are identical and have properties typical of batho intermediates of other visual pigments. Extended illumination of the violet cone opsin at 75 K, however, generates a red-shifted photostationary state (relative to both the dark and the batho intermediates) that has as absorption maximum at approximately 470 nm, and thermally reverts to form the normal batho intermediate when warmed to 140 K. We conclude that this red-shifted photostationary state is a metastable state, characterized by a higher-energy protein conformation that allows relaxation of the all-trans chromophore into a more planar conformation. FTIR spectroscopy of violet cone opsin indicates conclusively that the chromophore is protonated. A similar transformation of the rhodopsin binding site generates a model for the VCOP binding site that predicts roughly 75% of the observed blue shift of the violet cone pigment relative to rhodopsin. MNDO-PSDCI calculations indicate that secondary interactions involving the binding site residues are as important as the first-order chromophore protein interactions in mediating the wavelength maximum.     

A transporter converted into a sensor, a phototaxis signaling mutant of bacteriorhodopsin at 3.0 Å

Bacteriorhodopsin (BR) and sensory rhodopsin II (SRII), homologous photoactive proteins in haloarchaea, have different molecular functions. BR is a light-driven proton pump, whereas SRII is a phototaxis receptor that transmits a light-induced conformational change to its transducer HtrII. Despite these distinctly different functions, a single residue substitution, Ala215 to Thr215 in the BR retinal-binding pocket, enables its photochemical reactions to transmit signals to HtrII and mediate phototaxis. We pursued a crystal structure of the signaling BR mutant (BR_A215T) to determine the structural changes caused by the A215T mutation and to assess what new photochemistry is likely to be introduced into the BR photoactive site. We crystallized BR_A215T from bicelles and solved its structure to 3.0 Å resolution to enable an atomic-level comparison. The analysis was complemented by molecular dynamics simulation of BR mutated in silico. Three main conclusions regarding the roles of photoactive site residues in signaling emerge from the comparison of BR_A215T, BR, and SRII structures: (i) the Thr215 residue in signaling BR is positioned nearly identically with respect to the retinal chromophore as in SRII, consistent with its role in producing a steric conflict with the retinal C₁₄ group during photoisomerization, proposed earlier to be essential for SRII signaling from vibrational spectroscopy and motility measurements; (ii) Tyr174–Thr204 hydrogen bonding, critical in SRII signaling and mimicked in signaling BR, is likely auxiliary, for example, to maintain Thr204 in the proper position for the steric trigger to occur; and (iii) the primary role of Arg72 in SRII is spectral tuning and not signaling.     

Direct observation of the structural change of Tyr174 in the primary reaction of sensory rhodopsin II

Sensory rhodopsin II (SRII) is a negative phototaxis receptor containing retinal as its chromophore, which mediates the avoidance of blue light. The signal transduction is initiated by the photoisomerization of the retinal chromophore, resulting in conformational changes of the protein which are transmitted to a transducer protein. To gain insight into the SRII sensing mechanism, we employed time-resolved ultraviolet resonance Raman spectroscopy monitoring changes in the protein structure in the picosecond time range following photoisomerization. We used a 450 nm pump pulse to initiate the SRII photocycle and two kinds of probe pulses with wavelengths of 225 and 238 nm to detect spectral changes in the tryptophan and tyrosine bands, respectively. The observed spectral changes of the Raman bands are most likely due to tryptophan and tyrosine residues located in the vicinity of the retinal chromophore, i.e., Trp76, Trp171, Tyr51, or Tyr174. The 225 nm UVRR spectra exhibited bleaching of the intensity for all the tryptophan bands within the instrumental response time, followed by a partial recovery with a time constant of 30 ps and no further changes up to 1 ns. In the 238 nm UVRR spectra, a fast recovering component was observed in addition to the 30 ps time constant component. A comparison between the spectra of the WT and Y174F mutant of SRII indicates that Tyr174 changes its structure and/or environment upon chromophore photoisomerization. These data represent the first real-time observation of the structural change of Tyr174, of which functional importance was pointed out previously.     

Environment around the chromophore in pharaonis phoborhodopsin: mutation analysis of the retinal binding site.

Phoborhodopsin (pR or sensory rhodopsin II, sRII) and pharaonis phoborhodopsin (ppR or pharaonis sRII, psRII) have a unique absorption maximum (lambda(max)) compared with three other archaeal rhodopsins: lambda(max) of pR and ppR is approx. 500 nm and of others (e.g. bacteriorhodopsin, bR) is 560-590 nm. To determine the residue contributing to the opsin shift from ppR to bR, we constructed various ppR mutants, in which a single residue was substituted for a residue corresponding to that of bR. The residues mutated were those which differ from that of bR and locate within 5 A from the conjugated polyene chain of the chromophore or any methyl group of the polyene chain. The shifts of lambda(max) of all mutants were small, however. We constructed a mutant in which all residues which differ from those of bR in the retinal binding site were simultaneously substituted for those of bR, but the shift was only from 499 to 509 nm. Next, we constructed a mutant in which 10 residues located within 5 A from the polyene as described above were simultaneously substituted. Only 44% of the opsin shift (lambda(max) of 524 nm) from ppR to bR was obtained even when all amino acids around the chromophore were replaced by the same residues as bR. We therefore conclude that the structural factor is more important in accounting for the difference of lambda(max) between ppR and bR rather than amino acid substitutions. The possible structural factors are discussed.