Structural insights into the targeting of mRNA GU-rich elements by the three RRMs of CELF1

The CUG-BP, Elav-like family (CELF) of RNA-binding proteins control gene expression at a number of different levels by regulating pre-mRNA splicing, deadenylation and mRNA stability. We present structural insights into the binding selectivity of CELF member 1 (CELF1) for GU-rich mRNA target sequences of the general form 5′-UGUN_xUGUN_yUGU and identify a high affinity interaction (K_d ∼ 100 nM for x = 2 and y = 4) with simultaneous binding of all three RNA recognition motifs within a single 15-nt binding element. RNA substrates spin-labelled at either the 3′ or 5′ terminus result in differential nuclear magnetic resonance paramagnetic relaxation enhancement effects, which are consistent with a non-sequential 2-1-3 arrangement of the three RNA recognition motifs on UGU sites in a 5′ to 3′ orientation along the RNA target. We further demonstrate that CELF1 binds to dispersed single-stranded UGU sites at the base of an RNA hairpin providing a structural rationale for recognition of CUG expansion repeats and splice site junctions in the regulation of alternative splicing.     

Structural determinants of RNA recognition and cleavage by Dicer

A hallmark of RNA interference is the production of short double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules 21-28 nucleotides in length by the specialized RNase III protein Dicer. Dicer enzymes uniquely generate RNA products of specific lengths by mechanisms that have not been fully elucidated. Here we show that the PAZ domain responsible for dsRNA end recognition confers this measuring ability through both its structural position and RNA-binding specificity. Point mutations define the dsRNA-binding surface and reveal a protein loop important for cleavage of substrates containing perfect or imperfect base pairing. On the basis of these results, we reengineered Dicer with a U1A RNA-binding domain in place of the PAZ domain to create an enzyme with altered end-recognition specificity and RNA product length. These results explain how Dicer functions as a molecular ruler and provide a structural basis for modifying its activity in cells.     

Sequence and structural determinants of mannose recognition

Mannose, an abundant cell surface monosaccharide binds to a diverse set of receptors, which are involved in a variety of important cellular processes. Structural analysis has been carried out on all the proteins containing non-covalently bound mannose as a monosaccharide in the Protein Data Bank, to identify common recognition principles. Proteins, highly specific to mannose, belonging to the super family of bulb lectins, are found to contain a consensus sequence motif QXDXNXVXY, which has been identified to be essential for mannose binding. Analysis of this motif in the crystal structures of bulb lectins has led to the understanding of the contribution of individual residues in mannose recognition. Comparison with other mannose binding proteins, reveals common hydrogen bonding patterns in all of them, despite differences in sequence, overall fold and the substructures at the binding sites of individual proteins. A database analysis also suggests that although the topology of the backbone, as at the binding site in bulb lectins, can generate mannose binding capability in a few other proteins, sequence and disposition of not only the residues in the motif, but also the residues in the neighborhood play a crucial role in allowing that property to be retained.     

Solution structure of the two RNA recognition motifs of hnRNP A1 using segmental isotope labeling: how the relative orientation between RRMs influences the nucleic acid binding topology

Human hnRNP A1 is a multi-functional protein involved in many aspects of nucleic-acid processing such as alternative splicing, micro-RNA biogenesis, nucleo-cytoplasmic mRNA transport and telomere biogenesis and maintenance. The N-terminal region of hnRNP A1, also named unwinding protein 1 (UP1), is composed of two closely related RNA recognition motifs (RRM), and is followed by a C-terminal glycine rich region. Although crystal structures of UP1 revealed inter-domain interactions between RRM1 and RRM2 in both the free and bound form of UP1, these interactions have never been established in solution. Moreover, the relative orientation of hnRNP A1 RRMs is different in the free and bound crystal structures of UP1, raising the question of the biological significance of this domain movement. In the present study, we have used NMR spectroscopy in combination with segmental isotope labeling techniques to carefully analyze the inter-RRM contacts present in solution and subsequently determine the structure of UP1 in solution. Our data unambiguously demonstrate that hnRNP A1 RRMs interact in solution, and surprisingly, the relative orientation of the two RRMs observed in solution is different from the one found in the crystal structure of free UP1 and rather resembles the one observed in the nucleic-acid bound form of the protein. This strongly supports the idea that the two RRMs of hnRNP A1 have a single defined relative orientation which is the conformation previously observed in the bound form and now observed in solution using NMR. It is likely that the conformation in the crystal structure of the free form is a less stable form induced by crystal contacts. Importantly, the relative orientation of the RRMs in proteins containing multiple-RRMs strongly influences the RNA binding topologies that are practically accessible to these proteins. Indeed, RRM domains are asymmetric binding platforms contacting single-stranded nucleic acids in a single defined orientation. Therefore, the path of the nucleic acid molecule on the multiple RRM domains is strongly dependent on whether the RRMs are interacting with each other. The different nucleic acid recognition modes by multiple-RRM domains are briefly reviewed and analyzed on the basis of the current structural information.     

Sequence determinants for the recognition of the fork junction DNA containing the -10 region of promoter DNA by E. coli RNA polymerase

It has been recently suggested that E. coli RNA polymerase can specifically recognize a fork junction DNA structure, suggesting a possible role for such interaction in promoter DNA melting [Guo, Y., and Gralla, J. D. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95, 11655-11660]. We have determined here quantitatively, using a site-specific binding assay, the effects of base substitutions within the conserved -10 hexamer in the context of a short fork junction DNA on binding to RNA polymerase. Adenine at position -11 and thymine at position -7 were found to be critical for sequence-specific recognition of the DNA. The identities of bases at positions -9 and -8 were found to be not important for the binding whereas replacement of bases at positions -12 and -10 had a mild negative effect on the binding affinity. It was found that for the binding of fork DNA to RNA polymerase, specific sequence recognition was more important than specific recognition of fork junction DNA structure. The pattern of relative importance of bases in the -10 region for binding RNA polymerase was generally consistent with the sequence conservation pattern observed in nature where positions -11 and -7 are the most conserved. Binding experiments with a series of adenine analogues at position -11 revealed that the N1 nitrogen of adenine was a critical determinant for the preference of the adenine at this position, suggesting a mechanism for the nucleation of promoter DNA melting initiation in which RNA polymerase destabilizes duplex DNA by directly competing with the thymine of the A-T base pair for hydrogen bonding to the N1 position of the -11 nontemplate strand adenine.     

Expanded CUG repeats Dysregulate RNA splicing by altering the stoichiometry of the muscleblind 1 complex

To understand the role of the splice regulator muscleblind 1 (MBNL1) in the development of RNA splice defects in myotonic dystrophy I (DM1), we purified RNA-independent MBNL1 complexes from normal human myoblasts and examined the behavior of these complexes in DM1 myoblasts. Antibodies recognizing MBNL1 variants (MBNL1(CUG)), which can sequester in the toxic CUG RNA foci that develop in DM1 nuclei, were used to purify MBNL1(CUG) complexes from normal myoblasts. In normal myoblasts, MBNL1(CUG) bind 10 proteins involved in remodeling ribonucleoprotein complexes including hnRNP H, H2, H3, F, A2/B1, K, L, DDX5, DDX17, and DHX9. Of these proteins, only MBNL1(CUG) colocalizes extensively with DM1 CUG foci (>80% of foci) with its partners being present in <10% of foci. Importantly, the stoichiometry of MBNL1(CUG) complexes is altered in DM1 myoblasts, demonstrating an increase in the steady state levels of nine of its partner proteins. These changes are recapitulated by the expression of expanded CUG repeat RNA in Cos7 cells. Altered stoichiometry of MBNL1(CUG) complexes results from aberrant protein synthesis or stability and is unlinked to PKCα function. Modeling these changes in normal myoblasts demonstrates that increased levels of hnRNP H, H2, H3, F, and DDX5 independently dysregulate splicing in overlapping RNA subsets. Thus expression of expanded CUG repeats alters the stoichiometry of MBNL1(CUG) complexes to allow both the reinforcement and expansion of RNA processing defects.     

Structural basis for RNA recognition by the N-terminal tandem RRM domains of human RBM45

RBM45 is an RNA-binding protein involved in neural development, whose aggregation is associated with neurodegenerative diseases, such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and frontotemporal lobar dementia (FTLD). However, the mechanisms of RNA-binding and aggregation of RBM45 remain unelucidated. Here, we report the crystal structure of the N-terminal tandem RRM domains of human RBM45 in complex with single-stranded DNA (ssDNA). Our structural and biochemical results revealed that both the RRM1 and RRM2 of RBM45 recognized the GAC sequence of RNA/ssDNA. Two aromatic residues and an arginine residue in each RRM were critical for RNA-binding, and the interdomain linker was also involved in RNA-binding. Two RRMs formed a pair of antiparallel RNA-binding sites, indicating that the N-terminal tandem RRM domains of RBM45 bound separate GAC motifs in one RNA strand or GAC motifs in different RNA strands. Our findings will be helpful in the identification of physiologic targets of RBM45 and provide evidence for understanding the physiologic and pathologic functions of RBM45.     

Molecular architecture and ligand recognition determinants for T4 RNA ligase

RNA ligase type 1 from bacteriophage T4 (Rnl1) is involved in countering a host defense mechanism by repairing 5'-PO4 and 3'-OH groups in tRNA(Lys). Rnl1 is widely used as a reagent in molecular biology. Although many structures for DNA ligases are available, only fragments of RNA ligases such as Rnl2 are known. We report the first crystal structure of a complete RNA ligase, Rnl1, in complex with adenosine 5'-(alpha,beta-methylenetriphosphate) (AMPcPP). The N-terminal domain is related to the equivalent region of DNA ligases and Rnl2 and binds AMPcPP but with further interactions from the additional N-terminal 70 amino acids in Rnl1 (via Tyr37 and Arg54) and the C-terminal domain (Gly269 and Asp272). The active site contains two metal ions, consistent with the two-magnesium ion catalytic mechanism. The C-terminal domain represents a new all alpha-helical fold and has a charge distribution and architecture for helix-nucleic acid groove interaction compatible with tRNA binding.     

Sequence requirements for RNA binding by HuR and AUF1

The stability of RNAs bearing AU-rich elements in their 3'-UTRs, and thus the level of expression of their protein products, is regulated by interactions with cytoplasmic RNA-binding proteins. Binding by HuR generally leads to mRNA stabilization and increased protein production, whereas binding by AUF1 isoforms generally lead to rapid degradation of the mRNA and reduced protein production. The exact nature of the interplay between these and other RNA-binding proteins remains unclear, although recent studies have shown close interactions between them and even suggested competition between the two for binding to their cognate recognition sequences. Other recent reports have suggested that the sequences recognized by the two proteins are different. We therefore performed a detailed in vitro analysis of the binding site(s) for HuR and AUF1 present in androgen receptor mRNA to define their exact target sequences, and show that the same sequence is contacted by both proteins. Furthermore, we analysed a proposed HuR target within the 3'-UTR of MTA1 mRNA, and show that the contacted bases lie outside of the postulated motif and are a better match to a classical ARE than the postulated motif. The defining features of these HuR binding sites are their U-richness and single strandedness.     

Ribosomal RNA identity elements for ricin A-chain recognition and catalysis

Ricin is a cytotoxic protein that inactivates ribosomes by hydrolyzing the N-glycosidic bond between the base and the ribose at position A4324 in eukaryotic 28 S rRNA. The requirements for the recognition by ricin A-chain of this nucleotide and for the catalysis of cleavage were examined using a synthetic oligoribonucleotide that reproduces the sequence and the secondary structure of the RNA domain (a helical stem, a bulged nucleotide, and a 17-member single-stranded loop). The wild-type RNA (35mer) and a number of mutants were transcribed in vitro from synthetic DNA templates with phage T7 RNA polymerase. With the wild-type oligoribonucleotide the ricin A-chain catalyzed reaction has a Km of 13.55 microM and a Kcat of 0.023 min-1. Recognition and catalysis by ricin A-chain has an absolute requirement for A at the position that corresponds to 4324. The helical stem is also essential; however, the number of base-pairs can be reduced from the seven found in 28 S rRNA to three without loss of identity. The nature of these base-pairs can affect catalysis. A change of the second set from one canonical (G.C) to another (U.A) reduces sensitivity to ricin A-chain; whereas, a change of the third pair (U.A----G.C) produces supersensitivity. The bulged nucleotide does not contribute to identification. Hydrolysis is affected by altering the nucleotides in the universal sequence surrounding A4324 or by changing the position in the loop of the tetranucleotide GA(ricin)GA: all of these mutants have a null phenotype. If ribosomes are treated first with alpha-sarcin to cleave the phosphodiester bond at G4325 ricin can still catalyze depurination at A4324. This implies that cleavage by alpha-sarcin at the center of what has been presumed to be a 17 nucleotide single-stranded loop in 28 S rRNA produces ends that are constrained in some way. On the other hand, hydrolysis by alpha-sarcin of the corresponding position in the synthetic oligoribonucleotide prevents recognition by ricin A-chain. The results suggest that the loop has a complex structure, affected by ribosomal proteins, and this bears on the function in protein synthesis of the alpha-sarcin/ricin rRNA domain.     

RNA recognition and self-association of CPEB4 is mediated by its tandem RRM domains

Cytoplasmic polyadenylation is regulated by the interaction of the cytoplasmic polyadenylation element binding proteins (CPEB) with cytoplasmic polyadenylation element (CPE) containing mRNAs. The CPEB family comprises four paralogs, CPEB1–4, each composed of a variable N-terminal region, two RNA recognition motif (RRM) and a C-terminal ZZ-domain. We have characterized the RRM domains of CPEB4 and their binding properties using a combination of biochemical, biophysical and NMR techniques. Isothermal titration calorimetry, NMR and electrophoretic mobility shift assay experiments demonstrate that both the RRM domains are required for an optimal CPE interaction and the presence of either one or two adenosines in the two most commonly used consensus CPE motifs has little effect on the affinity of the interaction. Both the single RRM1 and the tandem RRM1–RRM2 have the ability to dimerize, although representing a minor population. Self-association does not affect the proteins’ ability to interact with RNA as demonstrated by ion mobility–mass spectrometry. Chemical shift effects measured by NMR of the apo forms of the RRM1–RRM2 samples indicate that the two domains are orientated toward each other. NMR titration experiments show that residues on the β-sheet surface on RRM1 and at the C-terminus of RRM2 are affected upon RNA binding. We propose a model of the CPEB4 RRM1–RRM2–CPE complex that illustrates the experimental data.     

Three RNA recognition motifs participate in RNA recognition and structural organization by the pro-apoptotic factor TIA-1

T-cell intracellular antigen-1 (TIA-1) regulates developmental and stress-responsive pathways through distinct activities at the levels of alternative pre-mRNA splicing and mRNA translation. The TIA-1 polypeptide contains three RNA recognition motifs (RRMs). The central RRM2 and C-terminal RRM3 associate with cellular mRNAs. The N-terminal RRM1 enhances interactions of a C-terminal Q-rich domain of TIA-1 with the U1-C splicing factor, despite linear separation of the domains in the TIA-1 sequence. Given the expanded functional repertoire of the RRM family, it was unknown whether TIA-1 RRM1 contributes to RNA binding as well as documented protein interactions. To address this question, we used isothermal titration calorimetry and small-angle X-ray scattering to dissect the roles of the TIA-1 RRMs in RNA recognition. Notably, the fas RNA exhibited two binding sites with indistinguishable affinities for TIA-1. Analyses of TIA-1 variants established that RRM1 was dispensable for binding AU-rich fas sites, yet all three RRMs were required to bind a polyU RNA with high affinity. Small-angle X-ray scattering analyses demonstrated a "V" shape for a TIA-1 construct comprising the three RRMs and revealed that its dimensions became more compact in the RNA-bound state. The sequence-selective involvement of TIA-1 RRM1 in RNA recognition suggests a possible role for RNA sequences in regulating the distinct functions of TIA-1. Further implications for U1-C recruitment by the adjacent TIA-1 binding sites of the fas pre-mRNA and the bent TIA-1 shape, which organizes the N- and C-termini on the same side of the protein, are discussed.     

RNA determinants of translational operator recognition by the DNA polymerases of bacteriophages T4 and RB69

The DNA polymerases (gp43s) of the two related phages T4 and RB69 are DNA-binding proteins that also function as mRNA-binding autogenous translational repressors. As repressors, T4 gp43 is narrowly specific to its own mRNA whereas RB69 gp43 is equally effective against mRNA for either protein. We used in vitro RNase-sensitivity and RNA footprinting assays to identify features of the non-identical T4 and RB69 mRNA targets (translational operators) that allow for their identical binding affinities and biological responses to RB69 gp43. We observed that T4 gp43 and RB69 gp43 produce identical footprints on RNA substrates bearing the T4-derived operator, suggesting that the two gp43s make identical contacts with this operator. In contrast, the footprint produced by RB69 gp43 on its autogenous RNA target was shorter than its footprint on operator RNA from T4. As expected, we also observed only weak protection of RB69-derived operator RNA from RNase by T4 gp43; however, photocross-linking studies suggested that T4 gp43 recognizes structural features of the RB69-derived operator that are not detected by RNase- sensitivity assays. The results suggest that RB69 gp43 and T4 gp43 differ in their abilities to use RNA-sequence-independent interactions to configure potential RNA targets for translational repression.