F-Actin Structure Destabilization and DNase I Binding Loop Fluctuations: Mutational Cross-Linking and Electron Microscopy Analysis of Loop States and Effects on F-Actin

The conformational dynamics of filamentous actin (F-actin) is essential for the regulation and functions of cellular actin networks. The main contribution to F-actin dynamics and its multiple conformational states arises from the mobility and flexibility of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop; residues 40-50) on subdomain 2. Therefore, we explored the structural constraints on D-loop plasticity at the F-actin interprotomer space by probing its dynamic interactions with the hydrophobic loop (H-loop), the C-terminus, and the W-loop via mutational disulfide cross-linking. To this end, residues of the D-loop were mutated to cysteines on yeast actin with a C374A background. These mutants showed no major changes in their polymerization and nucleotide exchange properties compared to wild-type actin. Copper-catalyzed disulfide cross-linking was investigated in equimolar copolymers of cysteine mutants from the D-loop with either wild-type (C374) actin or mutant S265C/C374A (on the H-loop) or mutant F169C/C374A (on the W-loop). Remarkably, all tested residues of the D-loop could be cross-linked to residues 374, 265, and 169 by disulfide bonds, demonstrating the plasticity of the interprotomer region. However, each cross-link resulted in different effects on the filament structure, as detected by electron microscopy and light-scattering measurements. Disulfide cross-linking in the longitudinal orientation produced mostly no visible changes in filament morphology, whereas the cross-linking of D-loop residues > 45 to the H-loop, in the lateral direction, resulted in filament disruption and the presence of amorphous aggregates on electron microscopy images. A similar aggregation was also observed upon cross-linking the residues of the D-loop (> 41) to residue 169. The effects of disulfide cross-links on F-actin stability were only partially accounted for by the simulations of current F-actin models. Thus, our results present evidence for the high level of conformational plasticity in the interprotomer space and document the link between D-loop interactions and F-actin stability.     

Intermolecular dynamics and function in actin filaments

Structural models of F-actin suggest that three segments in actin, the DNase I binding loop (residues 38-52), the hydrophobic plug (residues 262-274) and the C-terminus, contribute to the formation of an intermolecular interface between three monomers in F-actin. To test these predictions and also to assess the dynamic properties of intermolecular contacts in F-actin, Cys-374 pyrene-labeled skeletal alpha-actin and pyrene-labeled yeast actin mutants, with Gln-41 or Ser-265 replaced with cysteine, were used in fluorescence experiments. Large differences in Cys-374 pyrene fluorescence among copolymers of subtilisin-cleaved (between Met-47 and Gly-48) and uncleaved alpha-actin showed both intra- and intermolecular interactions between the C-terminus and loop 38-52 in F-actin. Excimer band formation due to intermolecular stacking of pyrene probes attached to Cys-41 and Cys-265, and Cys-41 and Cys-374, in mutant yeast F-actin confirmed the proximity of these residues on the paired sites (to within 18 A) in accordance with the models of F-actin structure. The dynamic properties of the intermolecular interface in F-actin formed by loop 38-52, plug 262-274 and the C-terminus may account for the observed cross-linking of these sites with reagents < 18 A. The functional importance of actin filament dynamics was demonstrated by the inhibition of the in vitro motility in the Gln-41-Cys-374 cross-linked actin filaments.     

Probing the structure of F-actin: cross-links constrain atomic models and modify actin dynamics.

Cross-links between protomers in F-actin can be used as a very sensitive probe of both the dynamics and structure of F-actin. We have characterized filaments formed from a previously described yeast actin Q41C mutant, where disulfide bonds can be formed between the Cys41 that is introduced into subdomain-2 and Cys374 on an adjacent protomer. We find that the distribution of cross-linked n-mers shows no cooperativity and corresponds to a random probability cross-linking reaction. The random distribution suggests that disulfide formation does not cause a significant perturbation of the F-actin structure. Consistent with this lack of perturbation, three-dimensional reconstructions of extensively cross-linked filaments, using a new approach to helical image analysis, show very small structural changes with respect to uncross-linked filaments. This finding is in conflict with refined models but in agreement with the original Holmes et al. model for F-actin. Under conditions where 94 % of the protomers are linked by disulfide bonds, the distribution of filament twist becomes more heterogeneous with respect to control filaments. A molecular model suggests that strain, introduced by the disulfide, is relieved by increasing the twist of the long-pitch actin helices. Disulfide formation makes yeast actin filaments approximately three times less flexible in terms of bending and similar, in this respect, to vertebrate skeletal muscle F-actin. These observations support previous reports that the rigidity of F-actin can be controlled by the position of subdomain-2, and that this region is more flexible in yeast F-actin than in skeletal muscle F-actin.     

Drebrin-induced Stabilization of Actin Filaments

Drebrin is a mammalian neuronal protein that binds to and organizes filamentous actin (F-actin) in dendritic spines, the receptive regions of most excitatory synapses that play a crucial role in higher brain functions. Here, the structural effects of drebrin on F-actin were examined in solution. Depolymerization and differential scanning calorimetry assays show that F-actin is stabilized by the binding of drebrin. Drebrin inhibits depolymerization mainly at the barbed end of F-actin. Full-length drebrin and its C-terminal truncated constructs were used to clarify the domain requirements for these effects. The actin binding domain of drebrin decreases the intrastrand disulfide cross-linking of Cys-41 (in the DNase I binding loop) to Cys-374 (C-terminal) but increases the interstrand disulfide cross-linking of Cys-265 (hydrophobic loop) to Cys-374 in the yeast mutants Q41C and S265C, respectively. We also demonstrate, using solution biochemistry methods and EM, the rescue of filament formation by drebrin in different cases of longitudinal interprotomer contact perturbation: the T203C/C374S yeast actin mutant and grimelysin-cleaved skeletal actin (between Gly-42 and Val-43). Additionally, we show that drebrin rescues the polymerization of V266G/L267G, a hydrophobic loop yeast actin mutant with an impaired lateral interface formation between the two filament strands. Overall, our data suggest that drebrin stabilizes actin filaments through its effect on their interstrand and intrastrand contacts.     

Cofilin (ADF) affects lateral contacts in F-actin

The effect of yeast cofilin on lateral contacts between protomers of yeast and skeletal muscle actin filaments was examined in solution. These contacts are presumably stabilized by the interactions of loop 262-274 of one protomer with two other protomers on the opposite strand in F-actin. Cofilin inhibited several-fold the rate of interstrand disulfide cross-linking between Cys265 and Cys374 in yeast S265C mutant F-actin, but enhanced excimer formation between pyrene probes attached to these cysteine residues. The possibility that these effects are due to a translocation of the C terminus of actin by cofilin was ruled out by measurements of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) from tryptophan residues and ATP to acceptor probes at Cys374. Such measurements did not reveal cofilin-induced changes in FRET efficiency, suggesting that changes in Cys265-Cys374 cross-linking and excimer formation stem from the perturbation of loop 262-274 by cofilin. Changes in lateral interactions in F-actin were indicated also by the cofilin-induced partial release of rhodamine phalloidin. Disulfide cross-linking of S265C yeast F-actin inhibited strongly and reversibly the release of rhodamine phalloidin by cofilin. Overall, this study provides solution evidence for the weakening of lateral interactions in F-actin by cofilin.     

Structural effects of cofilin on longitudinal contacts in F-actin

Structural effects of yeast cofilin on skeletal muscle and yeast actin were examined in solution. Cofilin binding to native actin was non-cooperative and saturated at a 1:1 molar ratio, with K(d)相似文献   

Hydrophobic loop dynamics and actin filament stability

It has been postulated that the hydrophobic loop of actin (residues 262-274) swings out and inserts into the opposite strand in the filament, stabilizing the filament structure. Here, we analyzed the hydrophobic loop dynamics utilizing four mutants that have cysteine residues introduced at a single location along the yeast actin loop. Lateral, copper-catalyzed disulfide cross-linking of the mutant cysteine residues to the native C374 in the neighboring strand within the filament was fastest for S265C, followed by V266C, L267C, and then L269C. Site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) studies revealed that C265 lies closest to C374 within the filament, followed by C266, C267, and then C269. These results are not predicted by the Holmes extended loop model of F-actin. Furthermore, we find that disulfide cross-linking destroys L267C and L269C filaments; only small filaments are observed via electron microscopy. Conversely, phalloidin protects the L267C and L269C filaments and inhibits their disulfide cross-linking. Combined, our data indicate that, in solution, the loop resides predominantly in a "parked" position within the filament but is able to dynamically populate other conformational states which stabilize or destabilize the filament. Such states may be exploited within a cell by filament-stabilizing and -destabilizing factors.     

Locking the hydrophobic loop 262-274 to G-actin surface by a disulfide bridge prevents filament formation

Models of F-actin structure predict the importance of hydrophobic loop 262-274 at the interface of subdomains 3 and 4 to interstrand interactions in filaments. If this premise is correct, prevention of the loop conformational change--its swinging motion--should abort filament formation. To test this hypothesis, we used site-directed mutagenesis to create yeast actin triple mutant (LC)2CA (L180C/L269C/C374A). This mutation places two cysteine residues in positions potentially enabling the locking of loop 262-274 to the monomer surface via disulfide formation. Exposure of the purified mutant to oxidation catalysts resulted in an increased electrophoretic mobility of actin on SDS PAGE and a loss of two cysteines by DTNB titrations, consistent with disulfide formation. The polymerization of un-cross-linked mutant actin by MgCl2 was inhibited strongly but could be restored to wild type actin levels by phalloidin and improved greatly through copolymerization with the wild-type actin. Light scattering measurements revealed nonspecific aggregation of the cross-linked actin under the same conditions. Electron microscopy confirmed the absence of filaments and the presence of amorphous aggregates in the cross-linked actin samples. Reduction of the disulfide bond by DTT restored normal actin polymerization in the presence of MgCl2 and phalloidin. These observations provide strong experimental support for a critical role of the hydrophobic loop 262-274 in the polymerization of actin into filaments.     

Mapping the cofilin binding site on yeast G-actin by chemical cross-linking

Cofilin is a major cytoskeletal protein that binds to both monomeric actin (G-actin) and polymeric actin (F-actin) and is involved in microfilament dynamics. Although an atomic structure of the G-actin-cofilin complex does not exist, models of the complex have been built using molecular dynamics simulations, structural homology considerations, and synchrotron radiolytic footprinting data. The hydrophobic cleft between actin subdomains 1 and 3 and, alternatively, the cleft between actin subdomains 1 and 2 have been proposed as possible high-affinity cofilin binding sites. In this study, the proposed binding of cofilin to the subdomain 1/subdomain 3 region on G-actin has been probed using site-directed mutagenesis, fluorescence labeling, and chemical cross-linking, with yeast actin mutants containing single reactive cysteines in the actin hydrophobic cleft and with cofilin mutants carrying reactive cysteines in the regions predicted to bind to G-actin. Mass spectrometry analysis of the cross-linked complex revealed that cysteine 345 in subdomain 1 of mutant G-actin was cross-linked to native cysteine 62 on cofilin. A cofilin mutant that carried a cysteine substitution in the α3-helix (residue 95) formed a cross-link with residue 144 in actin subdomain 3. Distance constraints imposed by these cross-links provide experimental evidence for cofilin binding between actin subdomains 1 and 3 and fit a corresponding docking-based structure of the complex. The cross-linking of the N-terminal region of recombinant yeast cofilin to actin residues 346 and 374 with dithio-bis-maleimidoethane (12.4 Å) and via disulfide bond formation was also documented. This set of cross-linking data confirms the important role of the N-terminal segment of cofilin in interactions with G-actin.     

Tropomyosin-troponin regulation of actin does not involve subdomain 2 motions

Dynamic properties of F-actin structure prompted suggestions (Squire, J. M., and Morris, E. P. (1998) FASEB J. 12, 761-771) that actin subdomain 2 movements play a role in thin-filament regulation. Using fluorescently labeled yeast actin mutants Q41C, Q41C/C374S, and D51C/C374S and azidonitrophenyl putrescine (ANP) Gln(41)-labeled alpha-actin, we monitored regulation-linked changes in subdomain 2. These actins had fully regulated acto-S1 ATPase activities, and emission spectra of regulated Q41C(AEDANS)/C374S and D51C(AEDANS)/C374S filaments did not reveal any calcium-dependent changes. Fluorescence energy transfer in these F-actins mostly occurred from Trp(340) and Trp(356) to 5-(2((acetyl)amino)ethyl)amino-naphthalene-1-sulfonate (AEDANS)-labeled Cys(41) or Cys(51) of adjacent same strand protomers. Our results show that fluorescence energy transfer between these residues is similar in the mostly blocked (-Ca(2+)) and closed (+Ca(2+)) states. Ca(2+) also had no effect on the excimer band in the pyrene-labeled Q41C-regulated actin, indicating virtually no change in the overlap of pyrenes on Cys(41) and Cys(374). ANP quenching of rhodamine phalloidin fluorescence showed that neither Ca(2+) nor S1 binding to regulated alpha-actin affects the phalloidin-probe distance. Taken together, our results indicate that transitions between the blocked, closed, and open regulatory states involve no significant subdomain 2 movements, and, since the cross-linked alpha-actin remains fully regulated, that subdomain 2 motions are not essential for actin regulation.     

Conformational dynamics of loop 262-274 in G- and F-actin

According to the original Holmes model of F-actin structure, the hydrophobic loop 262-274 stabilizes the actin filament by inserting into a pocket formed at the interface between two protomers on the opposing strand. Using a yeast actin triple mutant, L180C/L269C/C374A [(LC)(2)CA], we showed previously that locking the hydrophobic loop to the G-actin surface by a disulfide bridge prevents filament formation. We report here that the hydrophobic loop is mobile in F- as well as in G-actin, fluctuating between the extended and parked conformations. Copper-catalyzed, brief air oxidation of (LC)(2)CA F-actin on electron microscopy grids resulted in the severing of thin filaments and their conversion to amorphous aggregates. Disulfide, bis(methanethiosulfonate) (MTS), and dibromobimane (DBB) cross-linking reactions proceeded in solution at a faster rate with G- than with F-actin. Cross-linking of C180 to C269 by DBB (4.4 A) in either G- or F-actin resulted in shorter and less stable filaments. The cross-linking with a longer MTS-6 reagent (9.6 A) did not impair actin polymerization or filament structure. Myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and tropomyosin inhibited the disulfide cross-linking of phalloidin-stabilized F-actin. Electron paramagnetic resonance measurements with nitroxide spin-labeled actin revealed strong spin-spin coupling and a similar mean interspin distance ( approximately 10 A) in G- and in F-actin, with a broader distance distribution in G-actin. These results show loop 262-274 fluctuations in G- and F-actin and correlate loop dynamics with actin filament formation and stability.     

Actin hydrophobic loop 262-274 and filament nucleation and elongation

The importance of actin hydrophobic loop 262-274 dynamics to actin polymerization and filament stability has been shown recently with the use of the yeast mutant actin L180C/L269C/C374A, in which the hydrophobic loop could be locked in a “parked” conformation by a disulfide bond between C180 and C269. Such a cross-linked globular actin monomer does not form filaments, suggesting nucleation and/or elongation inhibition. To determine the role of loop dynamics in filament nucleation and/or elongation, we studied the polymerization of the cross-linked actin in the presence of cofilin, to assist with actin nucleation, and with phalloidin, to stabilize the elongating filament segments. We demonstrate here that together, but not individually, phalloidin and cofilin co-rescue the polymerization of cross-linked actin. The polymerization was also rescued by filament seeds added together with phalloidin but not with cofilin. Thus, loop immobilization via cross-linking inhibits both filament nucleation and elongation. Nevertheless, the conformational changes needed to catalyze ATP hydrolysis by actin occur in the cross-linked actin. When actin filaments are fully decorated by cofilin, the helical twist of filamentous actin (F-actin) changes by ∼ 5° per subunit. Electron microscopic analysis of filaments rescued by cofilin and phalloidin revealed a dense contact between opposite strands in F-actin and a change of twist by ∼ 1° per subunit, indicating either partial or disordered attachment of cofilin to F-actin and/or competition between cofilin and phalloidin to alter F-actin symmetry. Our findings show an importance of the hydrophobic loop conformational dynamics in both actin nucleation and elongation and reveal that the inhibition of these two steps in the cross-linked actin can be relieved by appropriate factors.     

Structure of an F-actin trimer disrupted by gelsolin and implications for the mechanism of severing

Stable oligomers of filamentous actin were obtained by cross-linking F-actin with 1,4-N,N'-phenylenedimaleimide and depolymerization with excess segment-1 of gelsolin. Segment-1-bound and cross-linked actin oligomers containing either two or three actin subunits were purified and shown to nucleate actin assembly. Kinetic assembly data from mixtures of monomeric actin and the actin oligomers fit a nucleation model where cross-linked actin dimer or trimer reacts with an actin monomer to produce a competent nucleus for filament assembly. We report the three-dimensional structure of the segment-1-actin hexamer containing three actin subunits, each with a tightly bound ATP. Comparative analysis of this structure with twelve other actin structures provides an atomic level explanation for the preferential binding of ATP by the segment-1-complexed actin. Although the structure of segment-1-bound actin trimer is topologically similar to the helical model of F-actin (1), it has a distorted symmetry compared with that of the helical model. This distortion results from intercalation of segment-1 between actin protomers that increase the rise per subunit and rotate each of the actin subunits relative to their positions in F-actin. We also show that segment-1 of gelsolin is able to sever actin filaments, although the severing activity of segment-1 is significantly lower than full-length gelsolin.     

Gln-41 is intermolecularly cross-linked to Lys-113 in F-actin by N-(4-azidobenzoyl)-putrescine.

The bifunctional reagent N-(4-azidobenzoyl)-putrescine was synthesized and covalently bound to rabbit skeletal muscle actin. The incorporation was mediated by guinea pig liver transglutaminase under conditions similar to those described by Takashi (1988, Biochemistry 27, 938-943); up to 0.5 M/M were incorporated into G-actin, whereas F-actin was refractory to incorporation. Peptide fractionation showed that at least 90% of the label was bound to Gln-41. The labeled G-actin was polymerized, and irradiation of the F-actin led to covalent intermolecular cross-linking. A cross-linked peptide complex was isolated from a tryptic digest of the cross-linked actin in which digestion was limited to arginine; sequence analysis as well as mass spectrometry indicated that the linked peptides contained residues 40-62 and residues 96-116, and that the actual cross-link was between Gln-41 and Lys-113. Thus the gamma-carboxyl group of Gln-41 must be within 10.7 A of the side chain (probably the amino group) of Lys-113 in an adjacent actin monomer. In the atomic model for F-actin proposed by Holmes et al. (1990, Nature 347, 44-49), the alpha-carbons of these residues in adjacent monomers along the two-start helices are sufficiently close to permit cross-linking of their side chains, and, pending atomic resolution of the side chains, the results presented here seem to support the proposed model.     

Interaction of the gonococcal porin P.IB with G- and F-actin

The invasion of epithelial cells by N. gonorrheae is accompanied by formation of a halo of actin filaments around the enveloped bacterium. The transfer of the bacterial major outer membrane protein, porin, to the host cell membrane during invasion makes it a candidate for a facilitator for the formation of this halo. Western analysis shows here that gonococcal porin P.IB associates with the actin cytoskeleton in infected cells. Using the pyrene-labeled Mg forms of yeast and muscle actins, we demonstrate that under low ionic strength conditions, P.IB causes formation of filamentous actin assemblies, although they, unlike F-actin, cannot be internally cross-linked with N,N'-4-phenylenedimaleimide (PDM). In F-buffer, low porin concentrations appear to accelerate actin polymerization. Higher P.IB concentrations lead to the formation of highly decorated fragmented F-actin-like filaments in which the actin can be cross-linked by PDM. Co-assembly of P.IB with a pyrene-labeled mutant actin, S(265)C, prevents formation of a pyrene excimer present with labeled S(265)C F-actin alone. Addition of low concentrations of porin to preformed F-actin results in sparsely decorated F-actin. Higher P.IB concentrations extensively decorate the filaments, thereby altering their morphology to a state like that observed when the components are copolymerized. With preformed labeled S(265)C F-actin, P.IB quenches the pyrene excimer. This decrease is prevented by the F-actin stabilizers phalloidin and to a lesser extent beryllium fluoride. P.IB's association with the actin cytoskeleton and its ability to interact with and remodel actin filaments support a direct role for porin in altering the host cell cytoskeleton during invasion.     

Disulfide cross-linking of caldesmon to actin.

Treatment of a solution of actin and smooth muscle caldesmon with 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid) results in the formation of a disulfide cross-link between the C-terminal penultimate residue Cys-374 of actin and Cys-580 in caldesmon's C-terminal actin-binding region. Therefore, these 2 residues are close in the actin-caldesmon complex. Since myosin also binds to actin in the vicinity of Cys-374 and since caldesmon inhibits actomyosin ATPase activity by the reduction of myosin binding to actin, then the inhibition might be by caldesmon sterically hindering or blocking myosin's interaction with actin. [Ca2+]Calmodulin, which reverses the inhibition of the ATPase activity, decreases the yield of the cross-linked species, suggesting a weakening of the caldesmon-actin interaction in the cross-linked region. It is possible to maximally cross-link one caldesmon molecule/every three actin monomers, in the absence or presence of tropomyosin, clearly ruling out an elongated, end-to-end alignment of caldesmon on the actin filament in vitro, and raising the possibility that the N-terminal part of caldesmon projects out from the filament. Reaction of 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoic acid)-modified actin with caldesmon leads to the same disulfide cross-linked product between actin and caldesmon Cys-580, enabling the specific labeling of the other caldesmon cysteine, residue 153, in the N-terminal part of caldesmon with a spectroscopic probe.     

Intermolecular coupling between loop 38-52 and the C-terminus in actin filaments.

The recently reported structural connectivity in F-actin between the DNase I binding loop on actin (residues 38-52) and the C-terminus region was investigated by fluorescence and proteolytic digestion methods. The binding of copper to Cys-374 on F- but not G-actin quenched the fluorescence of dansyl ethylenediamine (DED) attached to Gin-41 by more than 50%. The blocking of copper binding to DED-actin by N-ethylmaleimide labeling of Cys-374 on actin abolished the fluorescence quenching. The quenching of DED-actin fluorescence was restored in copolymers (1:9) of N-ethylmaleimide-DED-actin with unlabeled actin. The quenching of DED-actin fluorescence by copper was also abolished in copolymers (1:4) of DED-actin and N-ethylmaleimide-actin. These results show intermolecular coupling between loop 38-52 and the C-terminus in F-actin. Consistent with this, the rate of subtilisin cleavage of actin at loop 38-52 was increased by the bound copper by more than 10-fold in F-actin but not in G-actin. Neither acto-myosin subfragment-1 (S1) ATPase activity nor the tryptic digestion of G-actin and F-actin at the Lys-61 and Lys-69 sites were affected by the bound copper. These observations suggest that copper binding to Cys-374 does not induce extensive changes in actin structure and that the perturbation of loop 38-52 environment results from changes in the intermolecular contacts in F-actin.     

A three-dimensional FRET analysis to construct an atomic model of the actin-tropomyosin complex on a reconstituted thin filament

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) was used to construct an atomic model of the actin–tropomyosin (Tm) complex on a reconstituted thin filament. We generated five single-cysteine mutants in the 146–174 region of rabbit skeletal muscle α-Tm. An energy donor probe was attached to a single-cysteine Tm residue, while an energy acceptor probe was located in actin Gln41, actin Cys374, or the actin nucleotide binding site. From these donor–acceptor pairs, FRET efficiencies were determined with and without Ca²⁺. Using the atomic coordinates for F-actin and Tm, we searched all possible arrangements for Tm segment 146–174 on F-actin to calculate the FRET efficiency for each donor–acceptor pair in each arrangement. By minimizing the squared sum of deviations for the calculated FRET efficiencies from the observed FRET efficiencies, we determined the location of the Tm segment on the F-actin filament. Furthermore, we generated a set of five single-cysteine mutants in each of the four Tm regions 41–69, 83–111, 216–244, and 252–279. Using the same procedures, we determined each segment's location on the F-actin filament. In the best-fit model, Tm runs along actin residues 217–236, which were reported to compose the Tm binding site. Electrostatic, hydrogen-bonding, and hydrophobic interactions are involved in actin and Tm binding. The C-terminal region of Tm was observed to contact actin more closely than did the N-terminal region. Tm contacts more residues on actin without Ca²⁺ than with it. Ca²⁺-induced changes on the actin–Tm contact surface strongly affect the F-actin structure, which is important for muscle regulation.     

Mapping of Drebrin Binding Site on F-Actin

Drebrin is a filament-binding protein involved in organizing the dendritic pool of actin. Previous in vivo studies identified the actin-binding domain of drebrin (DrABD), which causes the same rearrangements in the cytoskeleton as the full-length protein. Site-directed mutagenesis, electron microscopic reconstruction, and chemical cross-linking combined with mass spectrometry analysis were employed here to map the DrABD binding interface on actin filaments. DrABD could be simultaneously attached to two adjacent actin protomers using the combination of 2-iminothiolane (Traut's reagent) and MTS1 [1,1-methanediyl bis(methanethiosulfonate)]. Site-directed mutagenesis combined with chemical cross-linking revealed that residue 238 of DrABD is located within 5.4 Å from C374 of actin protomer 1 and that native cysteine 308 of drebrin is near C374 of actin protomer 2. Mass spectrometry analysis revealed that a zero-length cross-linker, 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide, can link the N-terminal G-S extension of the recombinant DrABD to E99 and/or E100 on actin. Efficient cross-linking of drebrin residues 238, 248, 252, 270, and 271 to actin residue 51 was achieved with reagents of different lengths (5.4-19 Å). These results suggest that the “core” DrABD is centered on actin subdomain 2 and may adopt a folded conformation upon binding to F-actin. The results of electron microscopic reconstruction, which are in a good agreement with the cross-linking data, revealed polymorphism in DrABD binding to F-actin and suggested the existence of two binding sites. These results provide new structural insight into the previously observed competition between drebrin and several other F-actin-binding proteins.     

Actin cross-linking and inhibition of the actomyosin motor.

Intrastrand cross-linking of actin filaments by ANP, N-(4-azido-2-nitrophenyl) putrescine, between Gln-41 in subdomain 2 and Cys-374 at the C-terminus, was shown to inhibit force generation with myosin in the in vitro motility assays [Kim et al. (1998) Biochemistry 37, 17801-17809]. To clarify the immobilization of which of these two sites inhibits the actomyosin motor, the properties of actins with partially overlapping cross-linked sites were examined. pPDM (N,N'-p-phenylenedimaleimide) and ABP [N-(4-azidobenzoyl) putrescine] were used to obtain actin filaments cross-linked ( approximately 50%) between Cys-374 and Lys-191 (interstrand) and Gln-41 and Lys-113 (intrastrand), respectively. ANP, ABP, and pPDM cross-linked filaments showed similar inhibition of their sliding speeds and force generation with myosin ( approximately 25%) in the in vitro motility assays. In analogy to ANP cross-linking of actin, pPDM and ABP cross-linkings did not change the strong S1 binding to actin and the V(max) and K(m) parameters of actomyosin ATPase. The similar effects of these three cross-linkings reveal the tight coupling between structural elements of the subdomain 2/subdomain 1 interface and show the importance of its dynamic flexibility to force generation with myosin. The possibility that actin cross-linkings inhibit rate-limiting steps in motion and force generation during myosin cross-bridge cycle was tested in stopped-flow experiments. Measurements of the rates of mantADP release from actoS1 and ATP-induced dissociation of actoS1 did not reveal any differences between un-cross-linked and ANP cross-linked actin in these complexes. These findings are discussed in terms of the uncoupling between force generation and other aspects of actomyosin interactions due to a constrained dynamic flexibility of the subdomain 2/subdomain 1 interface in cross-linked actin filaments.