Centrosome reorientation in wound-edge cells is cell type specific

The reorientation of the microtubule organizing center during cell migration into a wound in the monolayer was directly observed in living wound-edge cells expressing gamma-tubulin tagged with green fluorescent protein. Our results demonstrate that in CHO cells, the centrosome reorients to a position in front of the nucleus, toward the wound edge, whereas in PtK cells, the centrosome lags behind the nucleus during migration into the wound. In CHO cells, the average rate of centrosome motion was faster than that of the nucleus; the converse was true in PtK cells. In both cell lines, centrosome motion was stochastic, with periods of rapid motion interspersed with periods of slower motion. Centrosome reorientation in CHO cells required dynamic microtubules and cytoplasmic dynein/dynactin activity and could be prevented by altering cell-to-cell or cell-to-substrate adhesion. Microtubule marking experiments using photoactivation of caged tubulin demonstrate that microtubules are transported in the direction of cell motility in both cell lines but that in PtK cells, microtubules move individually, whereas their movement is more coherent in CHO cells. Our data demonstrate that centrosome reorientation is not required for directed migration and that diverse cells use distinct mechanisms for remodeling the microtubule array during directed migration.     

Microtubules' interaction with cell cortex is required for their radial organization, but not for centrosome positioning

Microtubules in interphase mammalian cells usually form a radial array with minus-ends concentrated in the central region and plus-ends placed at the periphery. This is accepted as correct, that two factors determinate the radial organization of microtubules - the centrosome, which nucleate and anchor the microtubules minus-ends, and the interaction of microtubules with cortical dynein, which positions centrosome in the cell center. However, it looks as if there are additional factors, affecting the radial structure of microtubule system. We show here that in aged Vero cytoplasts (17 h after enucleation) microtubule system lost radial organization and became chaotic. To clear up the reasons of that, we studied centrosome activity, its position in the cytoplasts and microtubule dynamics. We found that centrosome in aged cytoplasts was still active and placed in the central region of the cytoplasm, while after total disruption of the microtubules it was displaced from the center. Microtubules in aged cytoplasts were not stabilized, but they lost their ability to stop to grow near cell cortex and continued to grow reaching it. Aged cytoplast lamellae was partially depleted with dynactin though Golgi remained compact indicating dynein activity. We conclude that microtubule stoppage at cell cortex is mediated by some (protein) factors, and these factors influence radial structure of microtubule system. It seems that the key role in centrosome positioning is played by dynein complexes anchored everywhere in the cytoplasm rather than anchored in cell cortex.     

The dynamics of microtubule repolymerization in a cell: rapid growth from the centrosome and slow recovery of free microtubules

According to the current view, the microtubule system in animal cells consists of two components: microtubules attached to the centrosome (these microtubules stretch radially towards the cell margin), and free microtubules randomly distributed in the cytoplasm without visible association with any microtubule-organizing centers. The ratio of the two sets of microtubules in the whole microtubule array is under discussion. Addressing this question, we have analysed the recovery of microtubules in cultured Vero nucleated cells and cytoplasts, with and without centrosomes in these. Cells were fixed at different time points, and individual microtubules were traced on serial optical sections. During a slow recovery after cold treatment (4 degrees C, for 4 h; recovery at 30 degrees C) polymerization of microtubules started mainly from the centrosome. At early stages of recovery the share of free microtubules made about 10% of all microtubules, and their total length increased slower than the lenght of centrosome-attached microtubules. During a rapid recovery after nocodazole treatment (10 microg/ml, 2 h; recovery in drug-free medium at 37 degrees C), the share of free microtubules was about 35%, but their total length increased slower than the length of centrosome-attached microtubules. In 6-8 min (rapid recovery) or 12-16 min (slow recovery), tips of centrosomal microtubules reached the cell margin, and their increased density made it impossible to recognize individual microtubules. However, under the same conditions in cytoplasts without centrosomes the normal number of microtubules recovered only in 60 min, which enabled us to suppose that the complete recovery of microtubule system in the whole cells may be also rather long. When the first centrosomal microtubules reached the cell margin, the optical density of microtubules started to decrease from the centrosome region towards the cell margin, according to the exponential curve. Later on, the optical density in the centrosome region and near the cell margin remained at the same level, but microtubule density increased in the middle part of the cell, and in 45-60 min the plot of the optical density vs the distance from the centrosome became linear, as in control cells. Since no significant curling of microtubules occurs near the cell margin, the density of microtubules in the endoplasm may increase due only to polymerization of free microtubules. We suppose that in cultured cells the microtubule network recovery proceeds in two stages. At the initial stage, a rapid growth of centrosomal microtubules takes place in addition to the turnover of free microtubules with unstable minus ends. At the second stage, when microtubule growth from the centrosome becomes limited by the cell margin, a gradual extension of free microtubules occurs in the internal cytoplasm.     

Radial-organized microtubules provide cell shape support and more effective intercellular transport then free microtubules

Microtubules take part in various cell processes, including cell polarization, migration, intercellular transport, and some others. Therefore, the spatial organization of microtubules is crucial for normal cell behavior. Fibroblasts have radial microtubule arrays that consist of microtubules that run from the centrosome. Two components compose this microtubule array, i.e., (1) minus ends attached to the centrosome microtubules with their plus ends radiating to the cell periphery and (2) free microtubules with ends not attached to the centrosome. Distinctions in the dynamic properties, intercellular organization, and structure of centrosome-attached and free microtubules allow us to assume that their cellular functions are also different. To study centrosome-attached and free microtubules functions, we used cytoplasts, i.e., nucleus-lacking cellular fragments that, under certain conditions, also lose their centrosomes. In these cytoplasts, there are only free microtubules. The shape, general morphology, and size of cytoplasts that retain their centrosomes differ only slightly from whole cells. Cytoplasts who have lost their centrosomes have an extremely thin network of microtubules located in their central region; furthermore, they lose the shape that is typical for fibroblast and become rough lamellae with protrusions. The internal architecture of the cytoplasm and organoid arrangement are also broken. Saltatory movements in cytoplasts with centrosomes are similar to those in whole cells; in cytoplasts without centrosomes, saltatory movements occur with velocities that are twofold less and by shorter distances. Saltatory movements of granules in centrosome-lacking cytoplasts took place basically in the central region of cytoplast and were less ordered than in whole cells and in cytoplasts with centrosomes. We believe that radial organized microtubules ensure the effective transport and dynamical interaction of microtubule plus ends with cellular cortical structures, which is sufficient to support the common fibroblast-like shape, whereas the disorganized free microtubules are not able to maintain the external fibroblast shape and its intercellular organization.     

How cellular membranes can regulate microtubule network

Microtubule array in eukaryotic cells supports directed transport of various cargoes driven by motor proteins. The arrangement of microtubules in cytoplasm is not stochastic; they are organized in a certain way setting a system of coordinates for intracellular transport. Most cultured fibroblast-like cells possess a radial microtubule array with the minus ends of microtubules gathered on the centrosome and plus ends directed towards the periphery of the cell. Mechanisms that regulate the formation of radial microtubule system remain unclear. Usually centrosome works as a microtubule-organizing center; however, the radial system of microtubules can be formed without centrosome participation. At least in some cases microtubule network can be organized by dynein-dynactin complexes associated with membrane vesicles. Membrane vesicles can nucleate microtubules, anchor them and move along them. However, the role of membrane organelles in microtubule organization began to attract attention of researches only recently. It this review we summarize the data indicating that membrane organelles can organize microtubules, providing “tracks” for their subsequent transport.     

Role of the centrosome in organizing the interphase microtubule array: properties of cytoplasts containing or lacking centrosomes

To study the role of the centrosome in microtubule organization in interphase cells, we developed a method for obtaining cytoplasts (cells lacking a nucleus) that did or did not contain centrosomes. After drug- induced microtubule depolymerization, cytoplasts with centrosomes made from sparsely plated cells reconstituted a microtubule array typical of normal cells. Under these conditions cytoplasts without centrosomes formed only a few scattered microtubules. This difference in degree of polymerization suggests that centrosomes affect not only the distribution but the amount of microtubules in cells. To our surprise, the extent of microtubules assembled increased with the cell density of the original culture. At confluent density, cytoplasts without centrosomes had many microtubules, equivalent to cytoplasts with centrosomes. The additional microtubules were arranged peripherally and differed from the centrosomal microtubules in their sensitivity to nocodazole. These and other results suggest that the centrosome stabilizes microtubules in the cell, perhaps by capping one end. Microtubules with greater sensitivity to nocodazole arise by virtue of change in the growth state of the cell and may represent free or uncapped polymers. These experiments suggest that the spatial arrangement of microtubules may change by shifting the total tubulin concentration or the critical concentration for assembly.     

Spatial organization of centrosome-attached and free microtubules in 3T3 fibroblasts

The spatial organization of microtubules is crucial for different cellular processes. It is traditionally supposed that fibroblasts have radial microtubule arrays consisting of long microtubules that run from the centrosome. However, a detailed analysis of the microtubule array in the internal cytoplasm has never been performed. In the current study, we used laser photobleaching to analyze the spatial organization of microtubules in the internal cytoplasm of cultured 3T3 fibroblasts. Cells were injected with Cy-3-labeled tubulin, after which the growth of microtubules in the centrosome region and peripheral parts of cytoplasm was assayed in the bleached zone. In most cases, microtubule growth in the bleached zone occurred rectilinearly; at distances of up to 5 μm, microtubules seldom bend more than 10°–15°. We considered a growing fragment of the microtubule as a vector with the beginning at the point of occurrence and the end at the point where the growth terminated (or the end point after 30 s if microtubule persistent growth proceeded for longer). We defined the direction of microtubule growth in different parts of the cell using these vectors and measured the angle of their deviation from the vector of comparison. In the area of the centrosome, we directed a comparison vector inside the bleached zone from the centrosome to the beginning of the growing microtubule segment; in the lamella and trailing part of the fibroblast, we used the vector of comparison directed along the long axis of the cell from its geometrical center to periphery. The microtubules growing straight away from the centrosome grew along the cell radius. However, at a distance of 10 μm from the centrosome, radially growing microtubules comprised 40% of the overall number, while at a distance of 20 μm, they made up only 25%. The rest of the microtubules grew in different directions, with the preferred angle between their growth direction and cell radius equaling around 90 °. In the lamella and trailing part of the fibroblast, 80% of all microtubules grew along the long axis of the cell or at an angle of no more than 20 °; 10–15% of microtubules grew along axis of the cell but towards the centrosome. Thus, in 3T3 fibroblasts, the radial system of microtubules is perturbed starting at a distance of several microns from the centrosome. In the internal cytoplasm, the microtubule system is completely disordered and, in the stretched parts of the polarized cell (lamella, trailing edge), the microtubule system again becomes well organized; microtubules are preferentially oriented along the long axis of the cell. From the results obtained, we conclude that the orderliness of microtubules at the periphery of the fibroblast is not a consequence of their growth from the centrosome; rather, their orientation is preset by local factors.     

The Role of Microtubules and Their Dynamics in Cell Migration

Although microtubules have long been implicated in cell locomotion, the mechanism of their involvement remains controversial. Most studies have concluded that microtubules play a positive role by regulating actin polymerization, transporting membrane vesicles to the leading edge, and/or facilitating the turnover of adhesion plaques. Here we used wild-type and mutant CHO cell lines with alterations in tubulin to demonstrate that microtubules can also act to restrain cell motility. Tubulin mutations or low concentrations of drugs that suppress microtubule dynamics without affecting the amount of microtubule polymer inhibited the rate of migration by preventing microtubule reorganization in the trailing portion of the cells where the more dynamic microtubules are normally found. Under these conditions, cells along the edge of a wound still extended lamellipodia and elongated toward the wound but were inhibited in their ability to retract their tails, thus retarding forward progress. The idea that microtubules normally act to restrain cell locomotion was confirmed by treating cells with high concentrations of nocodazole to depolymerize the microtubule network. In the absence of microtubules, wild-type CHO and HeLa cells could still move at near normal speeds, but the movement became more random. We conclude that microtubules act both to restrain cell movement and to establish directionality.     

Dynein motor regulation stabilizes interphase microtubule arrays and determines centrosome position

Cytoplasmic dynein is a microtubule-based motor protein responsible for vesicle movement and spindle orientation in eukaryotic cells. We show here that dynein also supports microtubule architecture and determines centrosome position in interphase cells. Overexpression of the motor domain in Dictyostelium leads to a collapse of the interphase microtubule array, forming loose bundles that often enwrap the nucleus. Using green fluorescent protein (GFP)-alpha-tubulin to visualize microtubules in live cells, we show that the collapsed arrays remain associated with centrosomes and are highly motile, often circulating along the inner surface of the cell cortex. This is strikingly different from wild-type cells where centrosome movement is constrained by a balance of tension on the microtubule array. Centrosome motility involves force-generating microtubule interactions at the cortex, with the rate and direction consistent with a dynein-mediated mechanism. Mapping the overexpression effect to a C-terminal region of the heavy chain highlights a functional domain within the massive sequence important for regulating motor activity.     

Evaluation of various methods of measurement of the microtubule length in the cytoplasm of cultured cells

It is generally assumed that microtubules in tissue culture cells extend from the centrosome to cell periphery, and the length of individual microtubules averages several dozens of microns. However, direct electron-microscopic measurements have cast some doubt on this assumption. In this study, the average length of microtubules in cultured Vero cells was estimated using a combined approach. The length of free cytoplasmic and centrosomal microtubules was determined by means of electron microscopy in serial sections; concurrently, the length of free microtubules in the lamella was measured in preparations stained with tubulin antibodies (an indirect immunofluorescent method), by tracing saltatory particle movements along the microtubules in living cells. According to the data of immunofluorescent microscopy, microtubule length in the lamella averaged 4.57 +/- 3.69 microns. However, since two or more microtubules can overlap, their length may be slightly overestimated by this method. On the other hand, saltatory movements are easy to monitor and measure fairly accurately, but their range may be shorter than the actual microtubule length because of a limited processiveness of motors (kinesin and dynein). On average, the trajectories of saltatory movements in living cells were 3.85 +/- 0.72 microns long. At the electron-microscopic level, microtubule length was analyzed using pseudo-three-dimensional reconstructions of the microtubule systems around the centrosome and in the lamella. The length of free microtubules in the lamella reached 18 microns, averaging 3.33 +/- 2.43 microns; the average length of centrosomal microtubules was 1.49 +/- 0.82 microns. Good correspondence between the data on microtubule length and arrangement obtained by different methods allows the conclusion that most of free microtubules in Vero cells actually have a length of 2-5 microns; i.e., they are much shorter than the cell radius (about 25 microns). Microtubules extending from the centrosome are shorter still and do not reach the cell periphery. Thus, most microtubules in the lamella of Vero cells are free and their ordered arrangement is not associated with their attachment to the centrosome.     

Centrosome behavior in motile HGF-treated PtK2 cells expressing GFP-gamma tubulin.

In response to locomotory cues, many motile cells have been shown to reposition their centrosome to a location in front of the nucleus, towards the direction of cell migration. We examined centrosome position in PtK(2) epithelial cells treated with hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), which stimulates motility but, unlike chemotactic agents or wounding of a monolayer, provides no directional cues. To observe centrosome movement directly, a plasmid encoding human gamma tubulin fused to the green fluorescent protein was expressed in HGF-treated cells. In cells whose movements were unconstrained by neighboring cells, we found that the position of the centrosome was not correlated with the direction of cell locomotion. Further, in cells where the direction of locomotion changed during the observation period, the centrosome did not reorient toward the new direction of locomotion. Analysis of centrosome and nuclear movement showed that motion of the centrosome often lagged behind that of the nucleus. Analysis of 249 fixed cells stained with an antibody to gamma tubulin confirmed our observations in live cells: 69% of the cells had centrosomes behind the nucleus, away from the direction of locomotion. Of these, 41% had their centrosome in the retraction tail. Confocal microscopy showed that the microtubule array in HGF treated PtK(2) cells was predominantly non-centrosomal. Because microtubules are required for efficient cellular locomotion, we propose that non-centrosomal microtubules stabilize the direction of locomotion without a requirement for reorientation of the centrosome.     

Regulated expression of the centrosomal protein DdCP224 affects microtubule dynamics and reveals mechanisms for the control of supernumerary centrosome number

The Dictyostelium XMAP215 family member DdCP224 is involved in centrosome duplication and cytokinesis and is concentrated at the centrosome and microtubule tips. Herein, we have created a DdCP224 promoter replacement mutant that allows both over- and underexpression. Overexpression led to supernumerary microtubule-organizing centers and, independently, an increase of the number of multinuclear cells. Electron microscopy demonstrated that supernumerary microtubule-organizing centers represented bona fide centrosomes. Live cell imaging of DdCP224-green fluorescent protein mutants also expressing green fluorescent protein-histone2B as a DNA label revealed that supernumerary centrosomes were also competent of cell cycle-dependent duplication. In contrast, underexpression of DdCP224 inhibited cell growth, reduced the number and length of astral microtubules, and caused nocodazole hypersensitivity. Moreover, microtubule regrowth after nocodazole removal was dependent on DdCP224. Underexpression also resulted in a striking disappearance of supernumerary centrosomes and multinuclear cells caused by previous overexpression. We show for the first time by live cell observation that the number of supernumerary centrosomes can be reduced either by centrosome fusion (coalescence) or by the formation of cytoplasts containing supernumerary centrosomes during cytokinesis.     

Dynamics of microtubules and positioning of female pronucleus during bovine parthenogenesis

The zygote centrosome, consisting of both paternal and maternal centrosomal components, is the microtubule-organizing center necessary for pronuclear migration and positioning in fertilization. Maternal centrosomal function in microtubule organization and pronuclear positioning, however, remains unclear. In the present study, we sought to elucidate the function of maternal centrosomes during bovine parthenotes in the microtubule organizational processes required to move the pronucleus to the cell center without sperm centrosomal components. Microtubule organization, pronuclear position, and distribution of gamma-tubulin, which is thought to be the major component of maternal centrosomal material, were imaged by immunocytochemistry and conventional epifluorescence microscopy. In bovine parthenotes treated with paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing drug, the cytoplasmic microtubule asters became organized after chemical activation, and the microtubules radiated dynamically toward the female pronucleus. The microtubule patterns correlated well with pronuclear movement to the cell center. Microtubules aggregated at regions of gamma-tubulin concentration, but gamma-tubulin did not localize to a spot until the first interphase of bovine parthenogenesis. These findings indicate that gamma-tubulin is responsible for microtubule organization as the maternal centrosome. In bovine parthenogenesis, the maternal centrosome then organizes cytoplasmic microtubules to move the female pronucleus into the cell center. We propose that the maternal centrosome plays a role as a functional centrosome despite the lack of a sperm contribution, making this structure less competent for microtubule organization in comparison with centrosomes containing sperm centrosomal components.     

Peripheral mechanisms take central stage in microtubule dynamics: Commentary on "Signaling function of α-catenin in microtubule regulation" by Shtutman et al.

Although the centrosome is traditionally viewed as cell’s principle microtubule organizing center (MTOC), regulation of microtubule dynamics at the cell cortex plays an equally important role in the formation of the steady-state microtubule network. Several recent studies, including one published in this issue, reveal that complex signaling mechanisms associated with adherence junctions influence both microtubule nucleation at the centrosome, and the stability of non-centrosomal microtubules.

In the mid 1980s Marc Kirschner and Timothy Mitchison proposed an elegant “search-and-capture” hypothesis that seemed to explain how cells manage to convert a simple radial array of microtubules produced by the centrosome into the complex and precisely regulated asymmetric network found in a typical polarized cell. The key to this mechanism was the selective stabilization of inherently dynamic microtubule plus ends at the certain parts of cell cortex.4 Subsequently, it was shown that microtubule plus ends can in fact be captured and stabilized at diverse cortical loci including focal adhesions and adherence junctions. These observations provided direct support to the search-and-capture hypothesis. However, in recent years it became clear that role of cell cortex in the regulation of microtubule dynamics goes beyond simple stabilization of the plus ends. For example, there is evidence that integrin β1 is involved in the regulation of microtubule nucleation at the centrosome.6 Further, in polarized epithelia, cell cortex serves as the dominant MTOC, effectively replacing the centrosome.5 Thus, cell-cortex mechanisms affect microtubule dynamics both at their plus- and minus ends. The challenge now is to identify molecular pathways underlying this regulation.

A study in this issue of Cell Cycle (Shtutman et al.) suggests that α-catenin, a major component of adherence junctions is responsible for promoting microtubule nucleation and/or stability in a centrosome-independent fashion. Shtutman and coworkers used centrosome-free cytoplasts. The number of microtubules in these cytoplasts is low in the absence of cell-cell contacts but increases to near-normal levels in confluent cultures3 or upon overexpression of cadherins1 suggesting that adherence junctions somehow regulate microtubule dynamics. Shtutman and coworkers now demonstrate a similar increase in microtubule density can be induced by overexpression of a membrane-targeted α catenin. This is an exciting finding because α-catenin is also directly involved in the regulation of actin dynamics2 and thus this molecule emerges as a central player in the global regulation of the cytoskeleton in response to extracellular interactions. Interestingly, expression of non-membrane-targeted α-catenin only mildly increased the density of microtubule network in centrosome-free cytoplasts suggesting that α-catenin needs to be engaged in an activation event at the cell cortex, perhaps within the adherence junction.

Although formation of cell-cell junctions clearly increases the density of microtubule network, microtubule nucleation appears to occur throughout the cytoplasm and not preferentially at adherence junctions in these cells.1 Thus, local interactions at adherence junctions ultimately result in the propagation of a certain factor(s) that influences global microtubule dynamics. The exact nature of this factor or even the general layout of the pathway that alters microtubule dynamics in response to cortical interactions remain unknown. However, the demonstration that α-catenin is one of the molecular players required for this pathway is an important towards the understanding the link between extracellular interactions and microtubule dynamics.

Further Reading

Chausovsky A, Bershadsky AD, Borisy GG. Cadherin-mediated regulation of microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 2000; 2:797- 804. Gates J, Peifer M. Can 1000 reviews be wrong? Actin, alpha-Catenin, and adherens junctions. Cell 2005; 123:769-72. Karsenti E, Kobayashi S, Mitchison T, Kirschner M. Role of the centrosome in organizing the interphase microtubule array: properties of cytoplasts containing or lacking centrosomes. J Cell Biol 1984; 98:1763-76. Kirschner M, Mitchison T. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 1986; 45:329-42. Reilein A, Yamada S, Nelson WJ. Self-organization of an acentrosomal microtubule network at the basal cortex of polarized epithelial cells. J Cell Biol 2005; 171:845-55. Reverte CG, Benware A, Jones CW, LaFlamme SE. Perturbing integrin function inhibits microtubule growth from centrosomes, spindle assembly, and cytokinesis. J Cell Biol 2006; 174:491-7.     

The Dynamic Behavior of Individual Microtubules Associated with Chromosomes In Vitro

Mitotic movements of chromosomes are usually coupled to the elongation and shortening of the microtubules to which they are bound. The lengths of kinetochore-associated microtubules change by incorporation or loss of tubulin subunits, principally at their chromosome-bound ends. We have reproduced aspects of this phenomenon in vitro, using a real-time assay that displays directly the movements of individual chromosome-associated microtubules as they elongate and shorten. Chromosomes isolated from cultured Chinese hamster ovary cells were adhered to coverslips and then allowed to bind labeled microtubules. In the presence of tubulin and GTP, these microtubules could grow at their chromosome-bound ends, causing the labeled segments to move away from the chromosomes, even in the absence of ATP. Sometimes a microtubule would switch to shortening, causing the direction of movement to change abruptly. The link between a microtubule and a chromosome was mechanically strong; 15 pN of tension was generally insufficient to detach a microtubule, even though it could add subunits at the kinetochore–microtubule junction. The behavior of the microtubules in vitro was regulated by the chromosomes to which they were bound; the frequency of transitions from polymerization to depolymerization was decreased, and the speed of depolymerization-coupled movement toward chromosomes was only one-fifth the rate of shortening for microtubules free in solution. Our results are consistent with a model in which each microtubule interacts with an increasing number of chromosome-associated binding sites as it approaches the kinetochore.     

Symmetry, stability, and reversibility properties of idealized confined microtubule cytoskeletons

Many cell cytoskeletons include an aster of microtubules, with the centrosome serving as the focal point. The position of the centrosome within the cell is important in such directional activities as wound closure and interactions of immune cells. Here we analyzed the centrosome positioning as it is dictated by microtubule elasticity alone in a mechanical model of an intrinsically fully symmetric microtubule aster. We demonstrate that the symmetry and the central position of the centrosome are unstable. The equilibrium deviation of the centrosome from the center is approximately proportional to the difference of the microtubule length and cell radius. The proportionality coefficient is 1 in flat cells and 2 in three-dimensional cells. The loss of symmetry is irreversible, and in general, the equilibrium form of the aster exhibits memory of past perturbations. The equilibrium position of the centrosome as a function of the microtubule length exhibits hysteresis, and the history of the length variation is reflected in the aster form. These properties of the simple aster of elastic microtubules must be taken into account in the analysis of more comprehensive theoretical models, and in the design and interpretation of experiments addressing the complex process of cytoskeleton morphogenesis.     

Role of the cytoskeleton during injury-induced cell migration in corneal endothelium

The role of microfilaments and microtubules during injury-induced cell migration of corneal endothelial cells in situ along their natural basement membrane has been investigated using organ culture. In the noninjured tissue, actin is localized at or near the plasma membrane, whereas tubulin is observed as a delicate lattice pattern throughout the cytoplasm. Twenty-four hours after a circular freeze injury, cells surrounding the wound area extend processes into this region. Fluorescent microscopy using phallotoxins and anti-tubulin antibodies demonstrated the presence of stress fibers and microtubule reorganization within these cells. Between 24 and 48 h post-injury endothelial cells move into the wound region, and by 48 h, the injury zone is repopulated and the monolayer is becoming reestablished. When injured corneas are placed in media containing 5 x 10(-7) M cytochalasin B, endothelial cell migration occurs; but it is slow, and wound closure is not complete even by 72 h. In contrast, when tissues are cultured in the presence of 10(-8) M colchicine, cell movement is greatly reduced, complete wound closure does not occur, and endothelial cells at the wound edge fail to display extensions typical of migrating cells. Furthermore, when injured endothelia are exposed to 0.05 micrograms/ml of actinomycin D for 15 min within the first hour after injury and transferred back into culture media lacking the drug for the duration of the experiment, migration does not occur and the wound persists. These actinomycin D treated cells remain viable as shown by their ability to incorporate 3H-uridine and 3H-thymidine. Fluorescence microscopy of actinomycin D treated tissues revealed the presence of stress filaments but disorganized microtubule patterns. Interestingly, 24 h after injury, if the tissue is exposed to actinomycin D, even for periods of up to 1 h, migration is not inhibited. Our results indicate that injury-induced endothelial cell movement appears to be more dependent on microtubule than microfilament reorganization and may require a critical timing of macromolecular synthesis.     

Free and centrosome-attached microtubules: quantitative analysis and the modeling of two-component system

In the internal cytoplasm of interphase cells the density of microtubules is the highest in the centrosome area and decreases to the cell periphery. As a rule, the quantity of fluorescent microtubules cannot be counted up in the internal cytoplasm, but it is possible to estimate microtubules quantity using measuring of their optical density. In living 3T3 and CHO cells the microtubules optical density decreased according to different mathematical dependences that apparently reflected the differences of their microtubule system organization. To determine appropriateness that circumscribe the reduction of microtubules optical density from the centrosome region to the direction of cell margin, we modeled cell contours with the certain ratio and interposition of centrosome-attached and free microtubules in vector schedules CorelDraw program. The decrease of optical density was analyzed in MetaMorph program as it was described earlier (Smurova et al., 2002). It was shown that fluorescent microtubules optical density decreased exponentially (y = ae(-bx)) if the system joined only microtubules growing from the centrosome up to the cell margin. The curve became smoother in the case of not all radial centrosome-attached microtubules reached the margin, and adding of free microtubules into the system led to the sharp fall in optical density in the centrosome area and to its gradual decrease at the cell periphery. The increase in free microtubules quantity changed the character of the curve describing the reduction of optical density microtubule system which included free and centrosome-attached microtubules in proportions of 5 : 1 was described by the equation of linear regression (f= k . x + b). Thus, the mathematical dependence describing the microtubules distribution from the centrosome to the cell periphery, depends on the ratio of microtubules and their relative positioning in the cell volume. The data obtained using model systems have coincided with the results of experiments. The graphs which described the increase in microtubules optical density during microtubule repolymerization after nocodazole treatment, corresponded to the graphs for model cells. Thus, the method we used allows to analyze the microtubule system in the cases when the direct observation of individual microtubules is difficult.     

Tumor promoter-induced centrosome splitting in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes

Human neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophils) adhering to a substratum undergo a dramatic change in cellular morphology when treated with the tumor promoter 12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate (TPA). Within a few minutes of TPA treatment, the cells cease locomotion and spread symmetrically on the substratum. Concomitantly, TPA initiates centrosome splitting in a manner similar to that induced by treatment of randomly locomoting cells with a chemotactic factor. The two centrioles of a centrosome separate by a distance of several micrometers, and each of the solitary centrioles is surrounded by an aster of microtubules. Some cells also establish a third, centriole-free aster of microtubules. TPA treatment increases the total number of microtubules associated with the centrosome(s) and also increases overall polymer length. The frequency of centrosome splitting is enhanced transiently by treatment with the synthetic chemotactic peptide f-Met-Leu-Phe. Centrosome splitting is interpreted in terms of an interaction between the cell periphery and the microtubule system. Possible cellular mechanisms of this unusual phenomenon are considered.     

Microtubules and Lis-1/NudE/dynein regulate invasive cell-on-cell migration in Drosophila

The environment through which cells migrate in vivo differs considerably from the in vitro environment where cell migration is often studied. In vivo many cells migrate in crowded and complex 3-dimensional tissues and may use other cells as the substratum on which they move. This includes neurons, glia and their progenitors in the brain. Here we use a Drosophila model of invasive, collective migration in a cellular environment to investigate the roles of microtubules and microtubule regulators in this type of cell movement. Border cells are of epithelial origin and have no visible microtubule organizing center (MTOC). Interestingly, microtubule plus-end growth was biased away from the leading edge. General perturbation of the microtubule cytoskeleton and analysis by live imaging showed that microtubules in both the migrating cells and the substrate cells affect movement. Also, whole-tissue and cell autonomous deletion of the microtubule regulator Stathmin had distinct effects. A screen of 67 genes encoding microtubule interacting proteins uncovered cell autonomous requirements for Lis-1, NudE and Dynein in border cell migration. Net cluster migration was decreased, with initiation of migration and formation of dominant front cell protrusion being most dramatically affected. Organization of cells within the cluster and localization of cell-cell adhesion molecules were also abnormal. Given the established role of Lis-1 in migrating neurons, this could indicate a general role of Lis-1/NudE, Dynein and microtubules, in cell-on-cell migration. Spatial regulation of cell-cell adhesion may be a common theme, consistent with observing both cell autonomous and non-autonomous requirements in both systems.