Extensibility of the Extended Tail Domain of Processive and Nonprocessive Myosin V Molecules

Myosin V is a single-molecule motor that moves organelles along actin. When myosin V pulls loads inside the cell in a highly viscous environment, the force on the motor is unlikely to be constant. We propose that the tether between the single-molecule motor and the cargo (i.e., the extended tail domain of the molecule) must be able to absorb the sudden mechanical motions of the motor and allow smooth relaxation of the motion of the cargo to a new position. To test this hypothesis, we compared the elastic properties of the extended tail domains of processive (mouse myosin Va) and nonprocessive (Drosophila myosin V) molecular motors. The extended tail domain of these myosins consists of mechanically strong coiled-coil regions interspersed with flexible loops. In this work we explored the mechanical properties of coiled-coil regions using atomic force microscopy. We found that the processive and nonprocessive coiled-coil fragments display different unfolding patterns. The unfolding of coiled-coil structures occurs much later during the atomic force microscopy stretch cycle for processive myosin Va than for nonprocessive Drosophila myosin V, suggesting that this elastic tether between the cargo and motor may play an important role in sustaining the processive motions of this single-molecule motor.     

Alternative S2 hinge regions of the myosin rod differentially affect muscle function, myofibril dimensions and myosin tail length

Muscle myosin heavy chain (MHC) rod domains intertwine to form alpha-helical coiled-coil dimers; these subsequently multimerize into thick filaments via electrostatic interactions. The subfragment 2/light meromyosin "hinge" region of the MHC rod, located in the C-terminal third of heavy meromyosin, may form a less stable coiled-coil than flanking regions. Partial "melting" of this region has been proposed to result in a helix to random-coil transition. A portion of the Drosophila melanogaster MHC hinge is encoded by mutually exclusive alternative exons 15a and 15b, the use of which correlates with fast (hinge A) or slow (hinge B) muscle physiological properties. To test the functional significance of alternative hinge regions, we constructed transgenic fly lines in which fast muscle isovariant hinge A was switched for slow muscle hinge B in the MHC isoforms of indirect flight and jump muscles. Substitution of the slow muscle hinge B impaired flight ability, increased sarcomere lengths by approximately 13% and resulted in minor disruption to indirect flight muscle sarcomeric structure compared with a transgenic control. With age, residual flight ability decreased rapidly and myofibrils developed peripheral defects. Computational analysis indicates that hinge B has a greater coiled-coil propensity and thus reduced flexibility compared to hinge A. Intriguingly, the MHC rod with hinge B was approximately 5 nm longer than myosin with hinge A, consistent with the more rigid coiled-coil conformation predicted for hinge B. Our study demonstrates that hinge B cannot functionally substitute for hinge A in fast muscle types, likely as a result of differences in the molecular structure of the rod, subtle changes in myofibril structure and decreased ability to maintain sarcomere structure in indirect flight muscle myofibrils. Thus, alternative hinges are important in dictating the distinct functional properties of myosin isoforms and the muscles in which they are expressed.     

Does the S2 rod of myosin II uncoil upon two-headed binding to actin? A leucine-zippered HMM study

Myosin II, like many molecular motors, is a two-headed dimer held together by a coiled-coil rod. The stability of the (S2) rod has implications for head-head interactions, force generation, and possibly regulation. Whether S2 uncoils has been controversial. To test the stability of S2, we constructed a series of "zippered" dimeric smooth muscle myosin II compounds, containing a high-melting temperature 32-amino acid GCN4 leucine zipper in the S2 rod beginning 0, 1, 2, or 15 heptads from the head-rod junction. We then assessed the ability of these and wild-type myosin to bind strongly via two heads to an actin filament by measuring the fluorescence quenching of pyrene-labeled actin induced by myosin binding. Such two-headed binding is expected to exert a large strain that tends to uncoil S2, and hence provide a robust test of S2 stability. We find that wild-type and zippered heavy meromyosin (HMM) are able to bind by both heads to actin under both nucleotide-free and saturating ADP conditions. In addition, we compared the actin affinity and rates for the 0- and 15-zippered HMMs in the phosphorylated "on" state and found them to be very similar. These results strongly suggest that S2 uncoiling is not necessary for two-headed binding of myosin to actin, presumably due to a compliant point in the myosin head(s). We conclude that S2 likely remains intact during the catalytic cycle.     

Coiled-coil nanomechanics and uncoiling and unfolding of the superhelix and alpha-helices of myosin

The nanomechanical properties of the coiled-coils of myosin are fundamentally important in understanding muscle assembly and contraction. Force spectra of single molecules of double-headed myosin, single-headed myosin, and coiled-coil tail fragments were acquired with an atomic force microscope and displayed characteristic triphasic force-distance responses to stretch: a rise phase (R) and a plateau phase (P) and an exponential phase (E). The R and P phases arise mainly from the stretching of the coiled-coils, with the hinge region being the main contributor to the rise phase at low force. Only the E phase was analyzable by the worm-like chain model of polymer elasticity. Restrained molecular mechanics simulations on an existing x-ray structure of scallop S2 yielded force spectra with either two or three phases, depending on the mode of stretch. It revealed that coiled-coil chains separate completely near the end of the P phase and the stretching of the unfolded chains gives rise to the E phase. Extensive conformational searching yielded a P phase force near 40 pN that agreed well with the experimental value. We suggest that the flexible and elastic S2 region, particularly the hinge region, may undergo force-induced unfolding and extend reversibly during actomyosin powerstroke.     

Complete nucleotide sequence and deduced polypeptide sequence of a nonmuscle myosin heavy chain gene from Acanthamoeba: evidence of a hinge in the rodlike tail

We have completely sequenced a gene encoding the heavy chain of myosin II, a nonmuscle myosin from the soil ameba Acanthamoeba castellanii. The gene spans 6 kb, is split by three small introns, and encodes a 1,509-residue heavy chain polypeptide. The positions of the three introns are largely conserved relative to characterized vertebrate and invertebrate muscle myosin genes. The deduced myosin II globular head amino acid sequence shows a high degree of similarity with the globular head sequences of the rat embryonic skeletal muscle and nematode unc 54 muscle myosins. By contrast, there is no unique way to align the deduced myosin II rod amino acid sequence with the rod sequence of these muscle myosins. Nevertheless, the periodicities of hydrophobic and charged residues in the myosin II rod sequence, which dictate the coiled-coil structure of the rod and its associations within the myosin filament, are very similar to those of the muscle myosins. We conclude that this ameba nonmuscle myosin shares with the muscle myosins of vertebrates and invertebrates an ancestral heavy chain gene. The low level of direct sequence similarity between the rod sequences of myosin II and muscle myosins probably reflects a general tolerance for residue changes in the rod domain (as long as the periodicities of hydrophobic and charged residues are largely maintained), the relative evolutionary "ages" of these myosins, and specific differences between the filament properties of myosin II and muscle myosins. Finally, sequence analysis and electron microscopy reveal the presence within the myosin II rodlike tail of a well-defined hinge region where sharp bending can occur. We speculate that this hinge may play a key role in mediating the effect of heavy chain phosphorylation on enzymatic activity.     

Conformational stability of the myosin rod

Chymotryptic cleavage patterns of myosin rods from pig stomach, chicken gizzard, and rabbit skeletal muscle indicate that short (approximately 45 nm) heavy meromyosin subfragment 2 (SF2) is a consistent product of all three rods, whereas long (approximately 60 nm) SF2 is derived only from skeletal muscle myosin. Differential scanning calorimetry was used to follow the thermally induced melting transition of the rods and certain of their subfragments. In 0.12 M KCl, sodium phosphate buffer, pH 6.2-7.6, the light meromyosin (LMM) and SF2 domains of each rod had essentially identical conformational stabilities. Temperature midpoints for the melting transitions were 54-56 degrees C for the two smooth muscle myosin rods and 50-53 degrees C for the skeletal muscle myosin rod. In 0.6 M K Cl buffer, melting transitions for the smooth muscle myosin rods were essentially unchanged, but skeletal muscle myosin rods showed multiphase melting, with major transitions at 43 degrees C and 52 degrees C. The first of these was tentatively attributed to LMM, and the second to SF2. In 0.12 M K Cl buffer, the LMM transition was stabilised so that it superimposed on that of SF2. No melting was observed in any of the rods at physiological temperature. These results indicate that, excluding a possible but only narrow hinge region, the entire myosin rod has essentially uniform conformational stability at physiological pH and ionic strength, and thus that the contractile and elastic properties of the cross-bridge exist in the heavy meromyosin subfragment 1 (SF1) domains of the molecule.     

A model to account for the elastic element in muscle crossbridges in terms of a bending myosin rod

We advance a structural model to account for the rapid elastic element seen in mechanical transient experiments on vertebrate skeletal muscle (A.F. Huxley & Simmons 1971 Nature, Lond. 233, 533-538). In contrast to other crossbridge models, ours does not envisage a myosin rod made up of two rigid portions connected by a hinge, but rather a gradually bending rod portion connecting the heads to the thick filament shaft. We propose that, in relaxed muscle, the subfragment 2 (S2) portion of the myosin rod is bound to the thick filament shaft by ionic interactions analogous to those between the light meromyosin (LMM) portions of the rod that constitute the body of the shaft. These interactions probably involve the alternating zones of positive and negative charge seen in myosin rod amino acid sequences. As the crossbridge cycle that generates tension begins, we propose that part of S2 detaches from the thick filament shaft and bends to enable the myosin head to attach to actin. When tension develops in the crossbridge, the S2 is straightened and more of it becomes detached from the shaft so that the junction between S2 and the myosin heads moves 3-4 nm axially. As tension declines at the end of the crossbridge stroke, we propose that S2 rebinds to the thick filament shaft and that this provides the restoring force to return the junction of the heads and S2 to its original axial position. Thus this movement would have the characteristics of an elastic element; detailed calculations indicate that it would have properties similar to those observed experimentally. Furthermore, this model can account for the radial attractive force seen in rigor and in contracting muscle, the decrease in stiffness when interfilament spacing is increased in skinned muscle, and the increased rate of proteolysis observed at the S2-LMM junction in contracting muscle.     

Inhibition of smooth muscle myosin's activity and assembly by an anti-rod monoclonal antibody.

Monoclonal antibodies specific for the rod region can affect smooth muscle myosin's motor properties. Actin movement by phosphorylated myosin was inhibited by an antibody (LMM.4) which binds to the COOH-terminal end of the coiled-coil rod, a region thought to be involved in filament assembly. The actin-activated ATPase activity of the myosin-antibody LMM.4 complex was also reduced 10-fold at actin concentrations that gave maximal turnover rates with filamentous myosin. Metal-shadowing of the phosphorylated myosin-antibody complex at low ionic strength showed small bundles of parallel extended molecules, instead of filaments. Five other anti-rod antibodies had little or no effect on myosin's ability to act as a motor. This is the first demonstration that a muscle myosin's activity is affected by its state of assembly. A common theme that emerges from the studies on both muscle and non-muscle myosins is that assembly into a filamentous structure stimulates the activity of the individual myosin molecules.     

Packing of α-Helical Coiled-Coil Myosin Rods in Vertebrate Muscle Thick Filaments

Muscle myosin filament backbones are aggregates of long coiled-coil α-helical myosin rods, with the myosin heads arranged approximately helically on the filament surface, but the details of the rod packing are not known. Computed Fourier transforms of plausible molecular packing models for the vertebrate striated muscle myosin filament have been compared with observed high-angle X-ray diffraction patterns from plaice fin muscle. Models considered include those in which the coiled-coil rod parts of myosin are packed into various kinds of subfilaments or into a curved molecular crystalline layer. A general conclusion is that if the myosin rods are tilted by less than about 1° or more than about 3° from the filament long axis, very poor agreement is obtained between the computed and observed high-angle diffraction patterns. Qualitative comparison of calculated Fourier transforms, taken together with electron micrograph information, shows that the curved molecular crystal model and a model with hexagonally close-packed 4-nm subfilaments appear to explain the whole set of observations more satisfactorily than the alternatives. It is argued on other grounds that of these two possibilities the curved molecular crystal model is the more plausible.     

The tip of the coiled-coil rod determines the filament formation of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin

Myosin II self-assembles to form thick filaments that are attributed to its long coiled-coil tail domain. The present study has determined a region critical for filament formation of vertebrate smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II. A monoclonal antibody recognizing the 28 residues from the C-terminal end of the coiled-coil domain of smooth muscle myosin II completely inhibited filament formation, whereas other antibodies recognizing other parts of the coiled-coil did not. To determine the importance of this region in the filament assembly in vivo, green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged smooth muscle myosin was expressed in COS-7 cells, and the filamentous localization of the GFP signal was monitored by fluorescence microscopy. Wild type GFP-tagged smooth muscle myosin colocalized with F-actin during interphase and was also recruited into the contractile ring during cytokinesis. Myosin with the nonhelical tail piece deleted showed similar behavior, whereas deletion of the 28 residues at the C-terminal end of the coiled-coil domain abolished this localization. Deletion of the corresponding region of GFP-tagged nonmuscle myosin IIA also abolished this localization. We conclude that the C-terminal end of the coiled-coil domain, but not the nonhelical tail piece, of myosin II is critical for myosin filament formation both in vitro and in vivo.     

Slip sliding away: load-dependence of velocity generated by skeletal muscle myosin molecules in the laser trap

Skeletal muscle's ability to shorten and lengthen against a load is a fundamental property, presumably reflecting the inherent load-dependence of the myosin molecular motor. Here we report the velocity of a single actin filament translocated by a mini-ensemble of skeletal myosin approximately 8 heads under constant loads up to 15 pN in a laser trap assay. Actin filament velocity decreased with increasing load hyberbolically, with unloaded velocity and stall force differing by a factor of 2 with [ATP] (30 vs. 100 muM). Analysis of actin filament movement revealed that forward motion was punctuated with rapid backward 60-nm slips, with the slip frequency increasing with resistive load. At stall force, myosin-generated forward movement was balanced by backward slips, whereas at loads greater than stall, myosin could no longer sustain forward motion, resulting in negative velocities as in eccentric contractions of whole muscle. Thus, the force-velocity relationship of muscle reflects both the inherent load-dependence of the actomyosin interaction and the balance between forward and reverse motion observed at the molecular level.     

Viscoelastic study of the mechanical unfolding of a protein by AFM

We have applied a dynamic force modulation technique to the mechanical unfolding of a homopolymer of immunoglobulin (Ig) domains from titin, (C47S C63S I27)5, [(I27)5] to determine the viscoelastic response of single protein molecules as a function of extension. Both the stiffness and the friction of the homopolymer system show a sudden decrease when a protein domain unfolds. The decrease in measured friction suggests that the system is dominated by the internal friction of the (I27)5 molecule and not solvent friction. In the stiffness-extension spectrum we detected an abrupt feature before each unfolding event, the amplitude of which decreased with each consecutive unfolding event. We propose that these features are a clear indication of the formation of the known unfolding intermediate of I27, which has been observed previously in constant velocity unfolding experiments. This simple force modulation AFM technique promises to be a very useful addition to constant velocity experiments providing detailed viscoelastic characterization of single molecules under extension.     

High flexibility of the actomyosin crossbridge resides in skeletal muscle myosin subfragment-2 as demonstrated by a new single molecule assay

Popular views of force generation in muscle indicate that a lever arm in the myosin head initiates displacement of the thin filament. However, this lever arm is attached to the thick filament backbone by a flexible combination of coiled coils and hinges in the myosin subfragment-2 (S2); therefore, efficient force generation depends on tension development in this linking structure. Herein, a single molecule assay is developed to examine the flexibility of the intact S2 relative to that of the myosin head. Fluorescently labeled myosin rod is polymerized onto a single myosin molecule that is bound to actin, and the resulting Brownian motion of the rod is analyzed at video rates by digital image processing. Complete rotations of the rod suggest significant amounts of random coil in the linking structure. The close similarity of twist rates for double-headed and single-headed myosin indicates that most of the flexibility originates at or beyond the first pitch of coiled coil in S2 and most likely at the hinge connecting S2 and the light meromyosin. The myosin head has a smaller but still detectable impact on this flexibility, since the addition of ADP to the rigor crossbridge produces differential effects on the torsional characteristics of double-headed versus single-headed myosin.     

Smooth muscle and skeletal muscle myosins produce similar unitary forces and displacements in the laser trap.

Purified smooth muscle myosin in the in vitro motility assay propels actin filaments at 1/10 the velocity, yet produces 3-4 times more force than skeletal muscle myosin. At the level of a single myosin molecule, these differences in force and actin filament velocity may be reflected in the size and duration of single motion and force-generating events, or in the kinetics of the cross-bridge cycle. Specifically, an increase in either unitary force or duty cycle may explain the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth muscle myosin. Similarly, an increase in attached time or decrease in unitary displacement may explain the reduced actin filament velocity of smooth muscle myosin. To discriminate between these possibilities, we used a laser trap to measure unitary forces and displacements from single smooth and skeletal muscle myosin molecules. We analyzed our data using mean-variance analysis, which does not rely on scoring individual events by eye, and emphasizes periods in the data with constant properties. Both myosins demonstrated multiple but similar event populations with discrete peaks at approximately +11 and -11 nm in displacement, and 1.5 and 3.5 pN in force. Mean attached times for smooth muscle myosin were longer than for skeletal-muscle myosin. These results explain much of the difference in actin filament velocity between these myosins, and suggest that an increased duty cycle is responsible for the enhanced force-generating capacity of smooth over skeletal-muscle myosin.     

Mutations in Drosophila myosin rod cause defects in myofibril assembly

The roles of myosin during muscle contraction are well studied, but how different domains of this protein are involved in myofibril assembly in vivo is far less understood. The indirect flight muscles (IFMs) of Drosophila melanogaster provide a good model for understanding muscle development and function in vivo. We show that two missense mutations in the rod region of the myosin heavy-chain gene, Mhc, give rise to IFM defects and abnormal myofibrils. These defects likely result from thick filament abnormalities that manifest during early sarcomere development or later by hypercontraction. The thick filament defects are accompanied by marked reduction in accumulation of flightin, a myosin binding protein, and its phosphorylated forms, which are required to stabilise thick filaments. We investigated with purified rod fragments whether the mutations affect the coiled-coil structure, rod aggregate size or rod stability. No significant changes in these parameters were detected, except for rod thermodynamic stability in one mutation. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that these mutations may produce localised rod instabilities. We conclude that the aberrant myofibrils are a result of thick filament defects, but that these in vivo effects cannot be detected in vitro using the biophysical techniques employed. The in vivo investigation of these mutant phenotypes in IFM development and function provides a useful platform for studying myosin rod and thick filament formation generically, with application to the aetiology of human myosin rod myopathies.     

Airway smooth muscle contraction at birth: in vivo versus in vitro comparisons to the adult.

It is clear from the literature that considerable postnatal development occurs in the contractile properties of skeletal and cardiac muscle. Nevertheless, few studies have focused on developmental changes in airway smooth muscle or on the functional capabilities of airway innervation in the newborn. Conclusions about force generation, based on measurements of pulmonary mechanics during stimulation of the vagus nerves, suggest that the newborn possesses a reduced capability to narrow airway diameter relative to the adult. This reduced in vivo response is accompanied by a reduction in maximal force generating capabilities when compared on the basis of force per unit tissue cross-sectional area (stress) in vitro. However, studies of porcine airways suggest that such a finding may simply reflect a reduction in the relative amount of contractile protein (myosin heavy chain) as seen in fetal or preterm smooth muscle. Thus, comparisons based on force normalized per cross-sectional area of myosin alter conclusions from one in which fetal tracheal smooth muscle generates less maximal force than the adult, to one in which the fetal trachea has greater contractile capabilities. Interestingly, comparisons of maximal isometric force in bronchial smooth muscle between different age groups remain unaffected when myosin heavy chain normalization is applied. Finally, there appears to be an age at which maximal force is significantly greater than at any other age, independent of the amount of smooth muscle (determined morphologically), smooth muscle myosin content, or myosin isoform. Whether this enhanced in vitro response is reflected in vivo, or is counteracted by other physiological mechanisms, remains to be seen.     

Critical regions for assembly of vertebrate nonmuscle myosin II

Myosin II molecules assemble and form filaments through their C-terminal rod region, and the dynamic filament assembly-disassembly process of nonmuscle myosin II molecules is important for cellular activities. To estimate the critical region for filament formation of vertebrate nonmuscle myosin II, we assessed the solubility of a series of truncated recombinant rod fragments of nonmuscle myosin IIB at various concentrations of NaCl. A C-terminal 248-residue rod fragment (Asp 1729-Glu 1976) was shown by its solubility behavior to retain native assembly features, and two regions within it were found to be necessary for assembly: 35 amino acid residues from Asp 1729 to Thr 1763 and 39 amino acid residues from Ala 1875 to Ala 1913, the latter containing a sequence similar to the assembly competence domain (ACD) of skeletal muscle myosin. Fragments lacking either of the two regions were soluble at any NaCl concentration. We referred to these two regions as nonmuscle myosin ACD1 (nACD1) and nACD2, respectively. In addition, we constructed an alpha-helical coiled-coil model of the rod fragment, and found that a remarkable negative charge cluster (termed N1) and a positive charge cluster (termed P2) were present within nACD1 and nACD2, respectively, besides another positive charge cluster (termed P1) in the amino-terminal vicinity of nACD2. From these results, we propose two major electrostatic interactions that are essential for filament formation of nonmuscle myosin II: the antiparallel interaction between P2 and N1 which is essential for the nucleation step and the parallel interaction between P1 and N1 which is important for the elongation step.     

The elastic properties of the structurally characterized myosin II S2 subdomain: a molecular dynamics and normal mode analysis

The elastic properties (stretching and bending moduli) of myosin are expected to play an important role in its function. Of particular interest is the extended α-helical coiled-coil portion of the molecule. Since there is no high resolution structure for the entire coiled-coil, a study is made of the scallop myosin II S2 subdomain for which an x-ray structure is available (Protein Data Bank 1nkn). We estimate the stretching and bending moduli of the S2 subdomain with an atomic level model by use of molecular simulations. Results were obtained from nonequilibrium molecular dynamics simulations in the presence of an external force, from the fluctuations in equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations and from normal modes. In addition, a poly-Ala (78 amino acid residues) α-helix model was examined to test the methodology and because of its interest as part of the lever arm. As expected, both the α-helix and coiled-coil S2 subdomain are very stiff for stretching along the main axis, with the stretching stiffness constant in the range 60-80 pN/nm (scaled to the 60 nm long S2). Both molecules are much more flexible for bending with a lateral stiffness of ∼0.010pN/nm for the S2 and 0.0055pN/nm for the α-helix (scaled to 60 nm). These results are expected to be useful in estimating cross-bridge elasticity, which is required for understanding the strain-dependent transitions in the actomyosin cycle and for the development of three-dimensional models of muscle contraction.     

Mutations that affect flightin expression in Drosophila alter the viscoelastic properties of flight muscle fibers

Striated muscles across phyla share a highly conserved sarcomere design yet exhibit broad diversity in contractile velocity, force, power output, and efficiency. Insect asynchronous flight muscles are characterized by high-frequency contraction, endurance, and high-power output. These muscles have evolved an enhanced delayed force response to stretch that is largely responsible for their enhanced oscillatory work and power production. In this study we investigated the contribution of flightin to oscillatory work using sinusoidal analysis of fibers from three flightless mutants affecting flightin expression: 1) fln⁰, a flightin null mutant, 2) Mhc¹³, a myosin rod point mutant with reduced levels of flightin, and 3) Mhc⁶, a second myosin rod point mutant with reduced levels of phosphorylated flightin. Fibers from the three mutants show deficits in their passive and dynamic viscoelastic properties that are commensurate with their effect on flightin expression and result in a significant loss of oscillatory work and power. Passive tension and passive stiffness were significantly reduced in fln⁰ and Mhc¹³ but not in Mhc⁶. The dynamic viscous modulus was significantly reduced in the three mutants, whereas the dynamic elastic modulus was reduced in fln⁰ and Mhc¹³ but not in Mhc⁶. Tension generation under isometric conditions was not impaired in fln⁰. However, when subjected to sinusoidal length perturbations, work-absorbing processes dominated over work-producing processes, resulting in no net positive work output. We propose that flightin is a major contributor to myofilament stiffness and a key determinant of the enhanced delayed force response to stretch in Drosophila flight muscles. flight muscles; muscle mutants; myosin