Expression of T1Rs and gustducin in palatal taste buds of mice

The palatal region of the oral cavity in rodents houses 100-300 taste buds and is particularly sensitive to sweet and umami compounds; yet, few studies have examined the expression patterns of transduction-related molecules in this taste field. We investigated the interrelationships between members of the T1R family and between each T1R and gustducin in palatal taste buds. Similar to lingual taste buds, T1R1 and T1R2 are generally expressed in separate palatal taste cells. In contrast to lingual taste buds, however, T1R2 and T1R3-positive palatal taste cells almost always coexpress gustducin, suggesting that sweet taste transduction in the palate is almost entirely dependent on gustducin. T1R1-positive palate taste cells coexpress gustducin about half the time, suggesting that other G proteins may contribute to the transduction of umami stimuli in this taste field.     

Co-expression pattern of Shh with Prox1 and that of Nkx2.2 with Mash1 in mouse taste bud

In mammals, taste buds are maintained by continuous turnover of cells, even in adulthood. Cell proliferation and differentiation continue to produce taste cells, which express various genes related to taste reception. We found the co-expression of Sonic hedgehog (Shh) with Prox1 and that of Nkx2.2 with Mash1 in adult mouse taste buds. Whereas Prox1was expressed strongly in cells in the basal region of mouse taste buds where Shh was co-expressed, it was expressed weakly in almost all taste bud cells lacking Shh expression. At 0.5 day after birth, when taste cells have not yet differentiated, the expressions of Shh and Prox1 completely overlapped in the epithelium of circumvallate papillae. Nkx2.2 was observed in cells expressing Mash1, but not in cells expressing genes related to taste reception, such as gustducin and T1R3. Almost all fusiform cells expressing Mash1 co-expressed Nkx2.2, while the majority of round cells expressing Mash1 in the basal region of taste buds lacked Nkx2.2 expression.     

Neural crest contribution to lingual mesenchyme, epithelium and developing taste papillae and taste buds

The epithelium of mammalian tongue hosts most of the taste buds that transduce gustatory stimuli into neural signals. In the field of taste biology, taste bud cells have been described as arising from "local epithelium", in distinction from many other receptor organs that are derived from neurogenic ectoderm including neural crest (NC). In fact, contribution of NC to both epithelium and mesenchyme in the developing tongue is not fully understood. In the present study we used two independent, well-characterized mouse lines, Wnt1-Cre and P0-Cre that express Cre recombinase in a NC-specific manner, in combination with two Cre reporter mouse lines, R26R and ZEG, and demonstrate a contribution of NC-derived cells to both tongue mesenchyme and epithelium including taste papillae and taste buds. In tongue mesenchyme, distribution of NC-derived cells is in close association with taste papillae. In tongue epithelium, labeled cells are observed in an initial scattered distribution and progress to a clustered pattern between papillae, and within papillae and early taste buds. This provides evidence for a contribution of NC to lingual epithelium. Together with previous reports for the origin of taste bud cells from local epithelium in postnatal mouse, we propose that NC cells migrate into and reside in the epithelium of the tongue primordium at an early embryonic stage, acquire epithelial cell phenotypes, and undergo cell proliferation and differentiation that is involved in the development of taste papillae and taste buds. Our findings lead to a new concept about derivation of taste bud cells that include a NC origin.     

Expression of gustducin overlaps with that of type III IP3 receptor in taste buds of the rat soft palate

Type III IP3 receptor (IP3R3) is one of the common critical calcium-signaling molecules for sweet, umami, and bitter signal transduction in taste cells, and the total IP3R3-expressing cell population represents all cells mediating these taste modalities in the taste buds. Although gustducin, a taste cell-specific G-protein, is also involved in sweet, umami, and bitter signal transduction, the expression of gustducin is restricted to different subsets of IP3R3-expressing cells by location in the tongue. Based on the expression patterns of gustducin and taste receptors in the tongue, the function of gustducin has been implicated primarily in bitter taste in the circumvallate (CV) papillae and in sweet taste in the fungiform (FF) papillae. However, in the soft palate (SP), the expression pattern of gustducin remains unclear and little is known about its function. In the present paper, the expression patterns of gustducin and IP3R3 in taste buds of the SP and tongue papillae in the rat were examined by double-color whole-mount immunohistochemistry. Gustducin was expressed in almost all (96.7%) IP3R3-expressing cells in taste buds of the SP, whereas gustducin-positive cells were 42.4% and 60.1% of IP3R3-expressing cells in FF and CV, respectively. Our data suggest that gustducin is involved in signal transduction of all the tastes of sweet, umami, and bitter in the SP, in contrast to its limited function in the tongue.     

Establishment of clonal cell lines of taste buds from a <Emphasis Type="Italic">p53</Emphasis><Superscript>−/−</Superscript> mouse tongue

A taste bud is a sensory organ and consists of 50-100 spindle-shaped cells. The cells function as taste acceptors. They have characteristics of both epithelial and neuronal cells. A taste bud contains four types of cells, type I, type II, type III cells, and basal cells. Taste buds were isolated from a tongue of a p53-deficient mouse at day 12, and 11 clonal taste bud (TBD) cell lines were established. In immunochemical analysis, all cell lines expressed cytokeratin 18, gustducin, T1R3, and neural cellular adhesion molecule, but not GLAST. In RT-PCR analysis, shh was not expressed in any of the cell lines. Further analysis with RT-PCR was conducted on four cell lines. They expressed G protein-coupled taste receptors; T1R3, T2R8 for sweet, bitter, umami. And they also expressed α-ENaC for salty taste. While, a candidate for sour receptor HCN4 was expressed in TBD-a1 and TBD-a7 lines. And another candidate for sour receptor PKD1L3 was slightly expressed in TBD-a1 and TBD-c1.     

Liposome‐mediated transfection of mature taste cells

The introduction and expression of exogenous DNA in neurons is valuable for analyzing a range of cellular and molecular processes in the periphery, e.g., the roles of transduction‐related proteins, the impact of growth factors on development and differentiation, and the function of promoters specific to cell type. However, sensory receptor cells, particularly chemosensory cells, have been difficult to transfect. We have successfully introduced plasmids expressing green and Discosoma Red fluorescent proteins (GFP and DsRed) into rat taste buds in primary culture. Transfection efficiency increased when delaminated taste epithelium was redigested with fresh protease, suggesting that a protective barrier of extracellular matrix surrounding taste cells may normally be present. Because taste buds are heterogeneous aggregates of cells, we used α‐gustducin, neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), and neuronal ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase (PGP9.5), markers for defined subsets of mature taste cells, to demonstrate that liposome‐mediated transfection targets multiple taste cell types. After testing eight commercially available lipids, we identified one, Transfast, that is most effective on taste cells. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of two common “promiscuous” promoters and one promoter that taste cells use endogenously. These studies should permit ex vivo strategies for studying development and cellular function in taste cells. © 2005 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Neurobiol, 2005     

Regional expression patterns of taste receptors and gustducin in the mouse tongue

In order to understand differences in taste sensitivities of taste bud cells between the anterior and posterior part of tongue, it is important to analyze the regional expression patterns of genes related to taste signal transduction on the tongue. Here we examined the expression pattern of a taste receptor family, the T1r family, and gustducin in circumvallate and fungiform papillae of the mouse tongue using double-labeled in situ hybridization. Each member of the T1r family was expressed in both circumvallate and fungiform papillae with some differences in their expression patterns. The most striking difference between fungiform and circumvallate papillae was observed in their co-expression patterns of T1r2, T1r3, and gustducin. T1r2-positive cells in fungiform papillae co-expressed T1r3 and gustducin, whereas T1r2 and T1r3 double-positive cells in circumvallate papillae merely expressed gustducin. These results suggested that in fungiform papillae, gustducin might play a role in the sweet taste signal transduction cascade mediated by a sweet receptor based on the T1r2 and T1r3 combination, in fungiform papillae.     

Development of the taste buds in rat embryogenesis

Electron microscopic studies have been made on the developing taste buds in fungiform and vallate papillae of prenatal rats. Three stages of differentiation of these buds are described. The first stage is characterized by presence of the nervous fibers in the connective tissue of the papillae and dense granules of various size, as well as dense-cored vesicles (500-700 A in diameter) in the basal parts of some epithelial cells at the top of the papillae (16-17th days of gestation). The second stage is characterized by nerve processes entering the epithelium and by formation of afferent synaptic contacts between the differentiating epithelial cells and the nervous fibers (19th day of gestation). At the third stage, the cluster of differentiating epithelial cells attains a form which is similar to mature taste buds (21-22nd days of gestation). Thus, to the birthday of rats, differentiation of the basal parts of the taste buds takes place, whereas the apical parts of the taste buds remain undeveloped and do not communicate with the oral cavity. Peculiarities of fine structure of differentiating epithelial cells at the three stages are discussed.     

Cytokeratin 14 is expressed in immature cells in rat taste buds

We analyzed the differentiation of taste bud cells, by precisely describing expression profiles of cytokeratins (CKs) 8 and 14 in relation to those of marker molecules including label of 5-bromo-2′-deoxy uridine (BrdU) injected. In rat circumvallate papillae, cell division was observed at the basal layer of the epithelium expressing CK14 and located outside taste buds. The progenitor cells began to migrate toward the apical surface and maintained CK14 expression at 1 day after BrdU injection (day 1). On the other hand, a minor population of newly divided cells was infrequently incorporated into taste buds and also maintained CK14 expression at day 1. In taste buds, the conversion of CK subtypes occurred from CK14 to cytokeratin 8 (CK8) at day 2–3, showing the differentiation from immature cells expressing CK14 into mature or maturing cells expressing CK8. Functionally matured cells such as taste receptor cells expressing inositol triphospate receptor type 3 (IP₃R3) never expressed CK14, suggesting that CK14 would be expressed only in immature cells. On the other hand, a small but distinct population of BrdU-positive cells still showed CK14 immunoreactivity in taste buds even at day 12, which might correspond to the cells that remain undifferentiated for a long period within taste buds.     

A novel family of mammalian taste receptors

In mammals, taste perception is a major mode of sensory input. We have identified a novel family of 40-80 human and rodent G protein-coupled receptors expressed in subsets of taste receptor cells of the tongue and palate epithelia. These candidate taste receptors (T2Rs) are organized in the genome in clusters and are genetically linked to loci that influence bitter perception in mice and humans. Notably, a single taste receptor cell expresses a large repertoire of T2Rs, suggesting that each cell may be capable of recognizing multiple tastants. T2Rs are exclusively expressed in taste receptor cells that contain the G protein alpha subunit gustducin, implying that they function as gustducin-linked receptors. In the accompanying paper, we demonstrate that T2Rs couple to gustducin in vitro, and respond to bitter tastants in a functional expression assay.     

Overexpression of lunatic fringe does not affect epithelial cell differentiation in the developing mouse lung

The Notch/Notch-ligand pathway regulates cell fate decisions and patterning in various tissues. Several of its components are expressed in the developing lung, suggesting that this pathway is important for airway cellular patterning. Fringe proteins, which modulate Notch signaling, are crucial for defining morphogenic borders in several organs. Their role in controlling cellular differentiation along anterior-posterior axis of the airways is unknown. Herein, we report the temporal-spatial expression patterns of Lunatic fringe (Lfng) and Notch-regulated basic helix-loop-helix factors, Hes1 and Mash-1, during murine lung development. Lfng was only expressed during early development in epithelial cells lining the larger airways. Those epithelial cells also expressed Hes1, but at later gestation Hes1 expression was confined to epithelium lining the terminal bronchioles. Mash-1 displayed a very characteristic expression pattern. It followed neural crest migration in the early lung, whereas at later stages Mash-1 was expressed in lung neuroendocrine cells. To clarify whether Lfng influences airway cell differentiation, Lfng was overexpressed in distal epithelial cells of the developing mouse lung. Overexpression of Lfng did not affect spatial or temporal expression of Hes1 and Mash-1. Neuroendocrine CGRP and protein gene product 9.5 expression was not altered by Lfng overexpression. Expression of proximal ciliated (beta-tubulin IV), nonciliated (CCSP), and distal epithelial cell (SP-C, T1alpha) markers also was not influenced by Lfng excess. Overexpression of Lfng had no effect on mesenchymal cell marker (alpha-sma, vWF, PECAM-1) expression. Collectively, the data suggest that Lunatic fringe does not play a significant role in determining cell fate in fetal airway epithelium.     

Expression of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in taste buds of mouse and hamster

Taste buds are specialized epithelial cell clusters in the oral squamous cell epithelium. Although taste buds have been reported to renew rapidly, the mechanism of cell cycle control in these specialized structures remains unresolved. To clarify the cell cycle status and role of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKI) for cell cycle control in the taste buds, we analyzed cell proliferation activity using bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and Ki-67 immunostainings and the expression of the Cip/Kip family of CDKI (p21Cip1, p27Kip1, and p57Kip2) in the circumvallate papillae of mouse and hamster. BrdU-positive cells were detected in the basal layer of the oral epithelium. In the taste buds, Ki-67-positive cells were seen in the basal area, with only a very few positive cells in the taste buds. Both p21Cip1 and p27Kip1 positive cells were seen in the suprabasal layer of the non-gustatory oral epithelium. In the taste buds, stronger p27Kip1 staining was detected than in the non-gustatory epithelium. Western blotting analysis revealed that p27Kip1 was abundant in the mucosal tissues from circumvallate papillae. Thus, our study suggests that the taste bud cells except for basal cells are post-mitotic cells and that the cell cycle arrest associated with taste bud cell differentiation could be regulated predominantly by p27Kip1.     

Liposome-mediated transfection of mature taste cells

The introduction and expression of exogenous DNA in neurons is valuable for analyzing a range of cellular and molecular processes in the periphery, e.g., the roles of transduction-related proteins, the impact of growth factors on development and differentiation, and the function of promoters specific to cell type. However, sensory receptor cells, particularly chemosensory cells, have been difficult to transfect. We have successfully introduced plasmids expressing green and Discosoma Red fluorescent proteins (GFP and DsRed) into rat taste buds in primary culture. Transfection efficiency increased when delaminated taste epithelium was redigested with fresh protease, suggesting that a protective barrier of extracellular matrix surrounding taste cells may normally be present. Because taste buds are heterogeneous aggregates of cells, we used alpha-gustducin, neuronal cell adhesion molecule (NCAM), and neuronal ubiquitin carboxyl terminal hydrolase (PGP9.5), markers for defined subsets of mature taste cells, to demonstrate that liposome-mediated transfection targets multiple taste cell types. After testing eight commercially available lipids, we identified one, Transfast, that is most effective on taste cells. We also demonstrate the effectiveness of two common "promiscuous" promoters and one promoter that taste cells use endogenously. These studies should permit ex vivo strategies for studying development and cellular function in taste cells.     

Expression of Mash1 in basal cells of rat circumvallate taste buds is dependent upon gustatory innervation

Mash1, a mammalian homologue of the Drosophila achaete-scute proneural gene complex, plays an essential role in differentiation of subsets of peripheral neurons. In this study, using RT-PCR and in situ RT-PCR, we investigated if Mash1 gene expression occurs in rat taste buds. Further, we examined dynamics of Mash1 expression in the process of degeneration and regeneration in denervated rat taste buds. In rat tongue epithelium, Mash1 gene expression is confined to circumvallate, foliate, and fungiform papilla epithelia that include taste buds. In taste buds, Mash1-expressing cells are round cells in the basal compartment. In contrast, the mature taste bud cells do not express the Mash1 gene. Denervation and regeneration experiments show that the expression of Mash1 requires gustatory innervation. We conclude that Mash1 is expressed in cells of the taste bud lineage, and that the expression of Mash1 in rat taste buds is dependent upon gustatory innervation.