APLF (C2orf13) is a novel human protein involved in the cellular response to chromosomal DNA strand breaks

Aprataxin and polynucleotide kinase (PNK) are DNA end processing factors that are recruited into the DNA single- and double-strand break repair machinery through phosphorylation-specific interactions with XRCC1 and XRCC4, respectively. These interactions are mediated through a divergent class of forkhead-associated (FHA) domain that binds to peptide sequences in XRCC1 and XRCC4 that are phosphorylated by casein kinase 2 (CK2). Here, we identify the product of the uncharacterized open reading frame C2orf13 as a novel member of this FHA domain family of proteins and we denote this protein APLF (aprataxin- and PNK-like factor). We show that APLF interacts with XRCC1 in vivo and in vitro in a manner that is stimulated by CK2. Yeast two-hybrid analyses suggest that APLF also interacts with the double-strand break repair proteins XRCC4 and XRCC5 (Ku86). We also show that endogenous and yellow fluorescent protein-tagged APLF accumulates at sites of H(2)O(2) or UVA laser-induced chromosomal DNA damage and that this is achieved through at least two mechanisms: one that requires the FHA domain-mediated interaction with XRCC1 and a second that is independent of XRCC1 but requires a novel type of zinc finger motif located at the C terminus of APLF. Finally, we demonstrate that APLF is phosphorylated in a DNA damage- and ATM-dependent manner and that the depletion of APLF from noncycling human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cells reduces rates of chromosomal DNA strand break repair following ionizing radiation. These data identify APLF as a novel component of the cellular response to DNA strand breaks in human cells.     

XRCC1 interacts with the p58 subunit of DNA Pol α-primase and may coordinate DNA repair and replication during S phase

Repair of single-stranded DNA breaks before DNA replication is critical in maintaining genomic stability; however, how cells deal with these lesions during S phase is not clear. Using combined approaches of proteomics and in vitro and in vivo protein–protein interaction, we identified the p58 subunit of DNA Pol α-primase as a new binding partner of XRCC1, a key protein of the single strand break repair (SSBR) complex. In vitro experiments reveal that the binding of poly(ADP-ribose) to p58 inhibits primase activity by competition with its DNA binding property. Overexpression of the XRCC1-BRCT1 domain in HeLa cells induces poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis, PARP-1 and XRCC1-BRCT1 poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation and a strong S phase delay in the presence of DNA damage. Addition of recombinant XRCC1-BRCT1 to Xenopus egg extracts slows down DNA synthesis and inhibits the binding of PCNA, but not MCM2 to alkylated chromatin, thus indicating interference with the assembly of functional replication forks. Altogether these results suggest a critical role for XRCC1 in connecting the SSBR machinery with the replication fork to halt DNA synthesis in response to DNA damage.     

Role of APE1 in differentiated neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells in response to oxidative stress: Use of APE1 small molecule inhibitors to delineate APE1 functions

Oxidative DNA damage has been implicated in a number of central nervous system pathologies. The base excision repair (BER) pathway is one of the most important cellular protection mechanisms that respond to oxidative DNA damage. Human apurinic (apyrimidinic) endonuclease/redox effector factor (APE1/Ref-1 or APE1) is an essential enzyme in the BER pathway and is expressed in both mitotic and post-mitotic cells in humans. In neurons, a reduction of APE1 expression increases chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity, while overexpression of APE1 protects cells against the cytotoxicity. However, given the multiple functions of APE1, knockdown of total APE1 is not completely informative of whether it is the redox or DNA repair activity, or interactions with other proteins. Therefore, the use of selective small molecules that can block each function independent of the other is of great benefit in ascertaining APE1 function in post-mitotic cells. In this study, we chose differentiated SH-SY5Y cells as our post-mitotic cell line model to investigate whether a drug-induced decrease in APE1 DNA repair or redox activity contributes to the growth and survival of post-mitotic cells under oxidative DNA damaging conditions. Here, we demonstrate that overexpression of WT-APE1 or C65-APE1 (repair competent) results in significant increase in cell viability after exposure to H₂O₂. However, the 177/226-APE1 (repair deficient) did not show a protective effect. This phenomenon was further confirmed by the use of methoxyamine (MX), which blocks the repair activity of APE1 that results in enhanced cell killing and apoptosis in differentiated SH-SY5Y cells and in neuronal cultures after oxidative DNA damaging treatments. Blocking APE1 redox function by a small molecule inhibitor, BQP did not decrease viability of SH-SY5Y cells or neuronal cultures following oxidative DNA damaging treatments. Our results demonstrate that the DNA repair function of APE1 contributes to the survival of nondividing post-mitotic cells following oxidative DNA damage.     

Localization of X-ray cross complementing gene 1 protein in the nuclear matrix is controlled by casein kinase II-dependent phosphorylation in response to oxidative damage

Base excision repair/single strand break repair (BER/SSBR) of damaged DNA is a highly efficient process. X-ray cross complementing protein 1 (XRCC1) functions as a key scaffold protein for BER/SSBR factors. Recent work has shown that XRCC1 forms dense foci at sites of DNA damage in a manner dependent on casein kinase II (CK2) phosphorylation. To investigate the mechanism underlying foci formation, we analyzed the subnuclear localization and phosphorylation status of XRCC1 during the repair process by biochemical fractionation of HeLa cellular proteins. The localization was also verified by in situ extraction of the fixed cells. In unchallenged cells, XRCC1 was primarily found in the chromatin fraction in a highly phosphorylated form; in addition, a minor population (10–15%) existed in the nuclear matrix (NM) with no or marginal phosphorylation.After hydrogen peroxide treatment, hyperphosphorylated XRCC1 appeared in the NM and accordingly, those in the chromatin fraction decreased. Foci formation and changes in XRCC1 distribution could be abolished by the knockdown of CK2, the expression of a non-phosphorylatable version of XRCC1, or the inhibition of poly-ADP ribosylation at the damage sites. Other BER factors, like DNA polymerase β, were also found to accumulate in the NM after hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage, although its association with the NM seemed relatively weak. Our results suggest that the constitutive phosphorylation of XRCC1 in the chromatin and its DNA damage-induced recruitment to the NM are critical for foci formation, and that the core reactions of BER/SSBR may occur in the NM.     

XRCC1 phosphorylation by CK2 is required for its stability and efficient DNA repair

XRCC1 is a scaffold protein that interacts with several DNA repair proteins and plays a critical role in DNA base excision repair (BER). XRCC1 protein is in a tight complex with DNA ligase IIIα (Lig III) and this complex is involved in the ligation step of both BER and repair of DNA single strand breaks. The majority of XRCC1 has previously been demonstrated to exist in a phosphorylated form and cells containing mutant XRCC1, that is unable to be phosphorylated, display a reduced rate of single strand break repair. Here, in an unbiased assay, we demonstrate that the cytoplasmic form of the casein kinase 2 (CK2) protein is the major protein kinase activity involved in phosphorylation of XRCC1 in human cell extracts and that XRCC1 phosphorylation is required for XRCC1-Lig III complex stability. We demonstrate that XRCC1-Lig III complex containing mutant XRCC1, in which CK2 phosphorylation sites have been mutated, is unstable. We also find that a knockdown of CK2 by siRNA results in both reduced XRCC1 phosphorylation and stability, which also leads to a reduced amount of Lig III and accumulation of DNA strand breaks. We therefore propose that CK2 plays an important role in DNA repair by contributing to the stability of XRCC1-Lig III complex.     

Disconnecting XRCC1 and DNA ligase III

DNA strand break repair is essential for the prevention of multiple human diseases, particularly those which feature neuropathology. To further understand the pathogenesis of these syndromes, we recently developed animal models in which the DNA single-strand break repair (SSBR) components, XRCC1 and DNA Ligase III (LIG3), were inactivated in the developing nervous system. Although biochemical evidence suggests that inactivation of XRCC1 and LIG3 should share common biological defects, we found profound phenotypic differences between these two models, implying distinct biological roles for XRCC1 and LIG3 during DNA repair. Rather than a key role in nuclear DNA repair, we found LIG3 function was central to mitochondrial DNA maintenance. Instead, our data indicate that DNA Ligase 1 is the main DNA ligase for XRCC1-mediated DNA repair. These studies refine our understanding of DNA SSBR and the etiology of neurological disease.     

Disconnecting XRCC1 and DNA ligase III

DNA strand break repair is essential for the prevention of multiple human diseases, particularly those which feature neuropathology. To further understand the pathogenesis of these syndromes, we recently developed animal models in which the DNA single-strand break repair (SSBR) components, XRCC1 and DNA Ligase III (LIG3), were inactivated in the developing nervous system. Although biochemical evidence suggests that inactivation of XRCC1 and LIG3 should share common biological defects, we found profound phenotypic differences between these two models, implying distinct biological roles for XRCC1 and LIG3 during DNA repair. Rather than a key role in nuclear DNA repair, we found LIG3 function was central to mitochondrial DNA maintenance. Instead, our data indicate that DNA Ligase 1 is the main DNA ligase for XRCC1-mediated DNA repair. These studies refine our understanding of DNA SSBR and the etiology of neurological disease.Key words: DNA repair, nervous system, neurodegeneration, DNA ligase III, DNA damage, XRCC1, mitochondria, mtDNA     

XRCC1 is required for DNA single-strand break repair in human cells

The X-ray repair cross complementing 1 (XRCC1) protein is required for viability and efficient repair of DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) in rodents. XRCC1-deficient mouse or hamster cells are hypersensitive to DNA damaging agents generating SSBs and display genetic instability after such DNA damage. The presence of certain polymorphisms in the human XRCC1 gene has been associated with altered cancer risk, but the role of XRCC1 in SSB repair (SSBR) in human cells is poorly defined. To elucidate this role, we used RNA interference to modulate XRCC1 protein levels in human cell lines. A reduction in XRCC1 protein levels resulted in decreased SSBR capacity as measured by the comet assay and intracellular NAD(P)H levels, hypersensitivity to the cell killing effects of the DNA damaging agents methyl methanesulfonate (MMS), hydrogen peroxide and ionizing radiation and enhanced formation of micronuclei following exposure to MMS. Lowered XRCC1 protein levels were also associated with a significant delay in S-phase progression after exposure to MMS. These data clearly demonstrate that XRCC1 is required for efficient SSBR and genomic stability in human cells.     

Human Xip1 (C2orf13) is a novel regulator of cellular responses to DNA strand breaks

DNA strand breaks arise continuously as the result of intracellular metabolism and in response to a multitude of genotoxic agents. To overcome such challenges to genomic stability, cells have evolved genome surveillance pathways that detect and repair damaged DNA in a coordinated fashion. Here we identify the previously uncharacterized human protein Xip1 (C2orf13) as a novel component of the checkpoint response to DNA strand breaks. Green fluorescent protein-tagged Xip1 was rapidly recruited to sites of DNA breaks, and this accumulation was dependent on a novel type of zinc finger motif located in the C terminus of Xip1. The initial recruitment kinetics of Xip1 closely paralleled that of XRCC1, a central organizer of single strand break (SSB) repair, and its accumulation was both delayed and sustained when the detection of SSBs was abrogated by inhibition of PARP-1. Xip1 and XRCC1 stably interacted through recognition of CK2 phosphorylation sites in XRCC1 by the Forkhead-associated (FHA) domain of Xip1, and XRCC1 was required to maintain steady-state levels of Xip1. Moreover, Xip1 was phosphorylated on Ser-116 by ataxia telangiectasia-mutated in response to ionizing radiation, further underscoring the potential importance of Xip1 in the DNA damage response. Finally, depletion of Xip1 significantly decreased the clonogenic survival of cells exposed to DNA SSB- or double strand break-inducing agents. Collectively, these findings implicate Xip1 as a new regulator of genome maintenance pathways, which may function to organize DNA strand break repair complexes at sites of DNA damage.     

Human base excision repair complex is physically associated to DNA replication and cell cycle regulatory proteins

It has been hypothesized that a replication associated repair pathway operates on base damage and single strand breaks (SSB) at replication forks. In this study, we present the isolation from the nuclei of human cycling cells of a multiprotein complex containing most of the essential components of base excision repair (BER)/SSBR, including APE1, UNG2, XRCC1 and POLβ, DNA PK, replicative POLα, δ and , DNA ligase 1 and cell cycle regulatory protein cyclin A. Co-immunoprecipitation revealed that in this complex DNA repair proteins are physically associated to cyclin A and to DNA replication proteins including MCM7. This complex is endowed with DNA polymerase and protein kinase activity and is able to perform BER of uracil and AP sites. This finding suggests that a preassembled DNA repair machinery is constitutively active in cycling cells and is ready to be recruited at base damage and breaks occurring at replication forks.     

Attempted base excision repair of ionizing radiation damage in human lymphoblastoid cells produces lethal and mutagenic double strand breaks

A significant proportion of cellular DNA damages induced by ionizing radiation are produced in clusters, also called multiply damaged sites. It has been demonstrated by in vitro studies and in bacteria that clustered damage sites can be converted to lethal double strand breaks by oxidative DNA glycosylases during attempted base excision repair. To determine whether DNA glycosylases could produce double strand breaks at radiation-induced clustered damages in human cells, stably transformed human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells that inducibly overexpress the oxidative DNA glycosylases/AP lyases, hNTH1 and hOGG1, were assessed for their radiation responses, including survival, mutation induction and the enzymatic production of double strand breaks post-irradiation. We found that additional double strand breaks were generated during post-irradiation incubation in uninduced TK6 control cells. Moreover, overproduction of either DNA glycosylase resulted in significantly increased double strand break formation, which correlated with an elevated sensitivity to the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of ionizing radiation. These data show that attempted repair of radiation damage, presumably at clustered damage sites, by the oxidative DNA glycosylases can lead to the formation of potentially lethal and mutagenic double strand breaks in human cells.     

Distinct spatiotemporal patterns and PARP dependence of XRCC1 recruitment to single-strand break and base excision repair

Single-strand break repair (SSBR) and base excision repair (BER) of modified bases and abasic sites share several players. Among them is XRCC1, an essential scaffold protein with no enzymatic activity, required for the coordination of both pathways. XRCC1 is recruited to SSBR by PARP-1, responsible for the initial recognition of the break. The recruitment of XRCC1 to BER is still poorly understood. Here we show by using both local and global induction of oxidative DNA base damage that XRCC1 participation in BER complexes can be distinguished from that in SSBR by several criteria. We show first that XRCC1 recruitment to BER is independent of PARP. Second, unlike SSBR complexes that are assembled within minutes after global damage induction, XRCC1 is detected later in BER patches, with kinetics consistent with the repair of oxidized bases. Third, while XRCC1-containing foci associated with SSBR are formed both in eu- and heterochromatin domains, BER complexes are assembled in patches that are essentially excluded from heterochromatin and where the oxidized bases are detected.     

Central role for the XRCC1 BRCT I domain in mammalian DNA single-strand break repair

The DNA single-strand break repair (SSBR) protein XRCC1 is required for genetic stability and for embryonic viability. XRCC1 possesses two BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal (BRCT) protein interaction domains, denoted BRCT I and II. BRCT II is required for SSBR during G(1) but is dispensable for this process during S/G(2) and consequently for cell survival following DNA alkylation. Little is known about BRCT I, but this domain has attracted considerable interest because it is the site of a genetic polymorphism that epidemiological studies have associated with altered cancer risk. We report that the BRCT I domain comprises the evolutionarily conserved core of XRCC1 and that this domain is required for efficient SSBR during both G(1) and S/G(2) cell cycle phases and for cell survival following treatment with methyl methanesulfonate. However, the naturally occurring human polymorphism in BRCT I supported XRCC1-dependent SSBR and cell survival after DNA alkylation equally well. We conclude that while the BRCT I domain is critical for XRCC1 to maintain genetic integrity and cell survival, the polymorphism does not impact significantly on this function and therefore is unlikely to impact significantly on susceptibility to cancer.     

Mechanism of protection by the flavonoids, quercetin and rutin, against tert-butylhydroperoxide- and menadione-induced DNA single strand breaks in Caco-2 cells

Protection by the flavonoids, quercetin and rutin, against tert-butylhydroperoxide (tert-BOOH)- and menadione-induced DNA single strand breaks was investigated in Caco-2 cells. Both tert-BOOH and menadione induced DNA single strand breaks in a concentration-dependent manner. Pre-incubation of Caco-2 cells with either quercetin or rutin for 24 h significantly decreased the formation of DNA single strand breaks evoked by tert-BOOH (P <.05). Iron chelators, 1,10-phenanthroline (o-Phen) and deferoxamine mesylate (DFO), also protected against tert-BOOH-induced DNA damage, whereas butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) had no effect. Quercetin, and not rutin, decreased the extent of menadione-induced DNA single strand breaks. DFO and BHT, and not o-Phen, protected against menadione-induced DNA strand break formation (P <.05). From the results of this study, iron ions were involved in tert-BOOH-induced DNA single strand break formation in Caco-2 cells, whereas DNA damage evoked by menadione was far more complex. We demonstrated that the flavonoids, quercetin and rutin, protected against tert-BOOH-induced DNA strand breaks by way of their metal ion chelating mechanism. However, quercetin, and not rutin, protected against menadione-induced DNA single strand breaks by acting as both a metal chelator and radical scavenger.     

DNA ligase III acts as a DNA strand break sensor in the cellular orchestration of DNA strand break repair

In the current model of DNA SSBR, PARP1 is regarded as the sensor of single-strand breaks (SSBs). However, biochemical studies have implicated LIG3 as another possible SSB sensor. Using a laser micro-irradiation protocol that predominantly generates SSBs, we were able to demonstrate that PARP1 is dispensable for the accumulation of different single-strand break repair (SSBR) proteins at sites of DNA damage in live cells. Furthermore, we show in live cells for the first time that LIG3 plays a role in mediating the accumulation of the SSBR proteins XRCC1 and PNKP at sites of DNA damage. Importantly, the accumulation of LIG3 at sites of DNA damage did not require the BRCT domain-mediated interaction with XRCC1. We were able to show that the N-terminal ZnF domain of LIG3 plays a key role in the enzyme''s SSB sensing function. Finally, we provide cellular evidence that LIG3 and not PARP1 acts as the sensor for DNA damage caused by the topoisomerase I inhibitor, irinotecan. Our results support the existence of a second damage-sensing mechanism in SSBR involving the detection of nicks in the genome by LIG3.     

Defective DNA Ligation during Short-Patch Single-Strand Break Repair in Ataxia Oculomotor Apraxia 1

Ataxia oculomotor apraxia 1 (AOA1) results from mutations in aprataxin, a component of DNA strand break repair that removes AMP from 5′ termini. Despite this, global rates of chromosomal strand break repair are normal in a variety of AOA1 and other aprataxin-defective cells. Here we show that short-patch single-strand break repair (SSBR) in AOA1 cell extracts bypasses the point of aprataxin action at oxidative breaks and stalls at the final step of DNA ligation, resulting in the accumulation of adenylated DNA nicks. Strikingly, this defect results from insufficient levels of nonadenylated DNA ligase, and short-patch SSBR can be restored in AOA1 extracts, independently of aprataxin, by the addition of recombinant DNA ligase. Since adenylated nicks are substrates for long-patch SSBR, we reasoned that this pathway might in part explain the apparent absence of a chromosomal SSBR defect in aprataxin-defective cells. Indeed, whereas chemical inhibition of long-patch repair did not affect SSBR rates in wild-type mouse neural astrocytes, it uncovered a significant defect in Aptx^−/− neural astrocytes. These data demonstrate that aprataxin participates in chromosomal SSBR in vivo and suggest that short-patch SSBR arrests in AOA1 because of insufficient nonadenylated DNA ligase.Oxidative stress is an etiological factor in many neurological diseases, including Alzheimer''s disease, Parkinson''s disease, and Huntington''s disease. One type of macromolecule damaged by reactive oxygen species is DNA, and oxidative damage to DNA has been suggested to be a significant factor in these and other neurological conditions (2). In particular, a number of rare hereditary neurodegenerative disorders have provided direct support for the notion that unrepaired DNA damage causes neural dysfunction. Not least of these are the recessive spinocerebellar ataxias, a number of which are associated with mutations in DNA damage response proteins (17). The archetypal DNA damage-associated spinocerebellar ataxia is ataxia-telangiectasia (A-T), in which mutations in ATM protein result in defects in the detection and signaling of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) (3). A-T-like disorder is a related disease that exhibits neurological features similar to those of A-T, resulting from mutation of Mre11, a component of the MRN complex that operates in conjunction with ATM during DSB detection and signaling (28).Two additional spinocerebellar ataxias are spinocerebellar ataxia with axonal neuropathy 1 (SCAN1) and ataxia oculomotor apraxia 1 (AOA1), in which the TDP1 and aprataxin proteins are mutated, respectively (9, 19, 27). Both TDP1 and aprataxin are components of the DNA strand break repair machinery (recently reviewed in references 6 and 24). Whereas SCAN1 is currently limited to nine individuals from a single family, AOA1 is one of the commonest recessive spinocerebellar ataxias. Aprataxin is a member of the histidine triad superfamily of nucleotide hydrolases/transferases and has been reported to remove phosphate and phosphoglycolate moieties from the 3′ termini of DNA strand breaks (26). Aprataxin can also remove AMP from a variety of ligands in vitro, including adenosine polyphosphates, AMP-lysine, AMP-NH₂ (adenine monophosphoramidate), and adenylated DNA in which AMP is covalently attached to the 5′ terminus of a DNA single-strand break (SSB) or DSB (1, 16, 23, 25). To date, aprataxin activity is greatest on AMP-DNA, suggesting that this may be the physiological substrate of this enzyme.In vitro, DNA strand breaks with 5′-AMP termini can arise from premature DNA ligase activity. DNA ligases adenylate 5′ termini at DNA breaks to enable nucleophilic attack of the resulting pyrophosphate bonds by 3′-hydroxyl termini, thereby resealing the breaks. However, DNA adenylation by DNA ligases can occur prematurely, before a 3′-hydroxyl terminus is available. Aprataxin reverses these premature DNA adenylation events, in vitro at least, effectively “resetting” the DNA ligation reaction to the beginning (1). Whether or not 5′-AMP arises in DNA in vivo or is a physiological substrate of aprataxin, however, is unknown. Moreover, attempts to measure DNA strand break repair rates in vivo are conflicting and have failed to identify a consistent defect in DNA SSB repair (SSBR) or DSB repair (DSBR) in AOA1 cells (14, 15, 20). It is thus not clear whether or not defects in DNA strand break repair can account for this neurodegenerative disease.Here we have resolved the discrepancy between the requirements for aprataxin in vitro and in vivo by identifying the stage at which SSBR reactions fail in vitro and by carefully analyzing chromosomal SSBR rates in vivo. We show that short-patch SSBR reactions are defective in AOA1 cell extracts at the final step of DNA ligation, resulting in the accumulation of adenylated DNA nicks, and that this defect can be rescued in AOA1 extracts independently of aprataxin by addition of recombinant DNA ligase. We also find that treatment with aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ) and Pol ɛ, unveils a measurable defect in chromosomal SSBR in Aptx^−/− primary neural astrocytes, suggesting that the adenylated nicks that arise from the short-patch repair defect can be channeled into long-patch repair in vivo. These data demonstrate that aprataxin participates in chromosomal SSBR and suggest that this process arrests in AOA1, at oxidative SSBs, due to insufficient levels of nonadenylated DNA ligase.     

E2F1 is involved in DNA single-strand break repair through cell-cycle-dependent upregulation of XRCC1 expression

The X-ray repair cross complementing group 1 (XRCC1) protein is involved in DNA base excision repair and its expression varies during the cell cycle. Although studies have demonstrated that rapid XRCC1-dependent single-strand break repair (SSBR) takes place specifically during S/G(2) phases, it remains unclear how it is regulated during the cell cycle. We found that XRCC1 is a direct regulatory target of E2F1 and further investigated the role of XRCC1 in DNA repair during the cell cycle. Saos2 primary osteosarcoma cells stably transfected with inducible E2F1-wt or mutant E2F1-132E were treated with hydroxurea (HU) for 36h and were subsequently withdrawn HU for 2-24h to test whether cell-cycle-dependent DNA SSBR requires E2F1-mediated upregulation of XRCC1. We found that SSBR activity, as determined using a qPCR-base method, was correlated with E2F1 levels at different phases of the cell cycle. XRCC1-positive (AA8) and negative (EM9) CHO cells were used to demonstrate that the alterations in SSBR were mediated by XRCC1. The results indicate that E2F1-mediated regulation of XRCC1 is required for cell-cycle-dependent SSBR predominantly in G(1)/S phases. Our observations have provided new mechanistic insight for understanding the role of E2F1 in the maintenance of genomic stability and cell survival during the cell cycle. The regulation of XRCC1 by E2F1 during cell-cycle-dependent SSBR might be an important aspect for practical consideration for resolving the problem of drug resistance in tumor chemotherapies.     

The protein kinase CK2 facilitates repair of chromosomal DNA single-strand breaks

CK2 was the first protein kinase identified and is required for the proliferation and survival of mammalian cells. Here, we have identified an unanticipated role for CK2. We show that this essential protein kinase phosphorylates the scaffold protein XRCC1 and thereby enables the assembly and activity of DNA single-strand break repair protein complexes in vitro and at sites of chromosomal breakage. Moreover, we show that inhibiting XRCC1 phosphorylation by mutation of the CK2 phosphorylation sites or preventing CK2 activity using a highly specific inhibitor ablates the rapid repair of cellular DNA single-strand breaks by XRCC1. These data identify a direct role for CK2 in the repair of chromosomal DNA strand breaks and in maintaining genetic integrity.     

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated and Rad3 Related (ATR) Protein Kinase Inhibition Is Synthetically Lethal in XRCC1 Deficient Ovarian Cancer Cells

Introduction

Ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3 Related (ATR) protein kinase is a key sensor of single-stranded DNA associated with stalled replication forks and repair intermediates generated during DNA repair. XRCC1 is a critical enzyme in single strand break repair and base excision repair. XRCC1-LIG3 complex is also an important contributor to the ligation step of the nucleotide excision repair response.

Methods

In the current study, we investigated synthetic lethality in XRCC1 deficient and XRCC1 proficient Chinese Hamster ovary (CHO) and human ovarian cancer cells using ATR inhibitors (NU6027). In addition, we also investigated the ability of ATR inhibitors to potentiate cisplatin cytotoxicity in XRCC1 deficient and XRCC1 proficient CHO and human cancer cells. Clonogenic assays, alkaline COMET assays, γH2AX immunocytochemistry, FACS for cell cycle as well as FITC-annexin V flow cytometric analysis were performed.

Results

ATR inhibition is synthetically lethal in XRCC1 deficient cells as evidenced by increased cytotoxicity, accumulation of double strand DNA breaks, G2/M cell cycle arrest and increased apoptosis. Compared to cisplatin alone, combination of cisplatin and ATR inhibitor results in enhanced cytotoxicity in XRCC1 deficient cells compared to XRCC1 proficient cells.

Conclusions

Our data provides evidence that ATR inhibition is suitable for synthetic lethality application and cisplatin chemopotentiation in XRCC1 deficient ovarian cancer cells.