Ribonuclease H evolution in retrotransposable elements

Eukaryotic and prokaryotic genomes encode either Type I or Type II Ribonuclease H (RNH) which is important for processing RNA primers that prime DNA replication in almost all organisms. This review highlights the important role that Type I RNH plays in the life cycle of many retroelements, and its utility in tracing early events in retroelement evolution. Many retroelements utilize host genome-encoded RNH, but several lineages of retroelements, including some non-LTR retroposons and all LTR retrotransposons, encode their own RNH domains. Examination of these RNH domains suggests that all LTR retrotransposons acquired an enzymatically weak RNH domain that is missing an important catalytic residue found in all other RNH enzymes. We propose that this reduced activity is essential to ensure correct processing of the polypurine tract (PPT), which is an important step in the life cycle of these retrotransposons. Vertebrate retroviruses appear to have reacquired their RNH domains, which are catalytically more active, but their ancestral RNH domains (found in other LTR retrotransposons) have degenerated to give rise to the tether domains unique to vertebrate retroviruses. The tether domain may serve to control the more active RNH domain of vertebrate retroviruses. Phylogenetic analysis of the RNH domains is also useful to "date" the relative ages of LTR and non-LTR retroelements. It appears that all LTR retrotransposons are as old as, or younger than, the "youngest" lineages of non-LTR retroelements, suggesting that LTR retrotransposons arose late in eukaryotes.     

Novel clades of chromodomain-containing Gypsy LTR retrotransposons from mosses (Bryophyta)

Retrotransposons are the major component of plant genomes. Chromodomain-containing Gypsy long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons are widely distributed in eukaryotes. Four distinct clades of chromodomain-containing Gypsy retroelements are known from the vascular plants: Reina, CRM, Galadriel and Tekay. At the same time, almost nothing is known about the repertoire of LTR retrotransposons in bryophyte genomes. We have combined a search of chromodomain-containing Gypsy retroelements in Physcomitrella genomic sequences and an experimental investigation of diverse moss species. The computer-based mining of the chromodomain-containing LTR retrotransposons allowed us to describe four different elements from Physcomitrella. Four novel clades were identified that are evolutionarily distinct from the chromodomain-containing Gypsy LTR retrotransposons of other plants.     

The varying microsporidian genome: existence of long-terminal repeat retrotransposon in domesticated silkworm parasite Nosema bombycis

Microsporidia are a group of intracellular parasites with an extremely compact genome and there is no confirmed evidence that retroelements are parasitised in these organisms. Using the dataset of 200,000 genomic shotgun reads of the silkworm pebrine Nosema bombycis, we have identified the eight complete N. bombycis long-terminal repeat retrotransposon (Nbr) elements. All of the Nbr elements are Ty3/gypsy members and have close relationships to Saccharomycetes long-terminal repeat retrotransposons identified previously, providing further evidence of their relationship to fungi. To explore the effect of retrotransposons in microsporidian genome evolution, their distribution was characterised by comparisons between two N. bombycis contigs containing the Nbr elements with the completed genome of the human parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi, which is closely related to N. bombycis. The Nbr elements locate between or beside syntenic blocks, which are often clustered with other transposable-like sequences, indicating that they are associated with genome size variation and syntenic discontinuities. The ratios of the number of non-synonymous substitutions per non-synonymous site to the number of synonymous substitutions per synonymous site of the open reading frames among members of each of the eight Nbr families were estimated, which reveal the purifying selection acted on the N. bombycis long-terminal repeat retrotransposons. These results strongly suggest that retrotransposons play a major role in reorganization of the microsporidian genome and they might be active. The present study presents an initial characterization of some transposable elements in the N. bombycis genome and provides some insight into the evolutionary mechanism of microsporidian genomes.     

A family of retrotransposons and associated genomic variation in wheat.

A family of related retroelements was characterized in the genomes of some Graminease species. The structure of these retroelements indicates that they are retrotransposons containing reading frames with sequence similarity to the polyproteins of copia and Ty. This family of retroelements (termed WIS-2) occurs in the genomes of barley, wheat, rye, oats, and Aegilops species. Ongoing genomic variation both within individual plants of a wheat variety and within and between varieties of wheat is associated with some members of the WIS-2 family.     

New BEL-like LTR-retrotransposons in Fugu rubripes, Caenorhabditis elegans, and Drosophila melanogaster

The BEL group of retroelements is present in greater numbers, variety and taxonomic range than may have been thought previously. In addition to the insects, nematodes and schistosomes, BEL-like elements are present in echinoderms, urochordates, and at least two highly diverged species of fish. We describe one new full-length BEL-like element in Fugu that we call Suzu, another in Drosophila that we call Tinker, and seven new families in C. elegans. Many of the C. elegans elements have an unusual insertion at the 5' end. The previously known Roo, TRAM and Telemac are also BEL-like retrotransposons. Some BEL-like elements have captured an envelope gene, probably from other retroelements in some cases but from a phlebovirus in one case.     

LINEs, SINEs and processed pseudogenes: parasitic strategies for genome modeling

Two major classes of retrotransposons have invaded eukaryotic genomes: the LTR retrotransposons closely resembling the proviral integrated form of infectious retroviruses, and the non-LTR retrotransposons including the widespread, autonomous LINE elements. Here, we review the modeling effects of the latter class of elements, which are the most active in humans, and whose enzymatic machinery is subverted to generate a large series of "secondary" retroelements. These include the processed pseudogenes, naturally present in all eukaryotic genomes possessing non-LTR retroelements, and the very successful SINE elements such as the human Alu sequences which have evolved refined parasitic strategies to efficiently bypass the original "protectionist" cis-preference of LINEs for their own retrotransposition.     

Envelope-Like Retrotransposons in the Plant Kingdom: Evidence of Their Presence in Gymnosperms (Pinus pinaster)

Retroviruses differ from retrotransposons due to their infective capacity, which depends critically on the encoded envelope. Some plant retroelements contain domains reminiscent of the env of animal retroviruses but the number of such elements described to date is restricted to angiosperms. We show here the first evidence of the presence of putative env-like gene sequences in a gymnosperm species, Pinus pinaster (maritime pine). Using a degenerate primer approach for conserved domains of RNaseH gene, three clones from putative envelope-like retrotransposons (PpRT2, PpRT3, and PpRT4) were identified. The env-like sequences of P. pinaster clones are predicted to encode proteins with transmembrane domains. These sequences showed identity scores of up to 30% with env-like sequences belonging to different organisms. A phylogenetic analysis based on protein alignment of deduced aminoacid sequences revealed that these clones clustered with env-containing plant retrotransposons, as well as with retrotransposons from invertebrate organisms. The differences found among the sequences of maritime pine clones isolated here suggest the existence of different putative classes of env-like retroelements. The identification for the first time of env-like genes in a gymnosperm species may support the ancestrality of retroviruses among plants shedding light on their role in plant evolution.     

The ingi and RIME non-LTR retrotransposons are not randomly distributed in the genome of Trypanosoma brucei

The ingi (long and autonomous) and RIME (short and nonautonomous) non--long-terminal repeat retrotransposons are the most abundant mobile elements characterized to date in the genome of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. These retrotransposons were thought to be randomly distributed, but a detailed and comprehensive analysis of their genomic distribution had not been performed until now. To address this question, we analyzed the ingi/RIME sequences and flanking sequences from the ongoing T. brucei genome sequencing project (TREU927/4 strain). Among the 81 ingi/RIME elements analyzed, 60% are complete, and 7% of the ingi elements (approximately 15 copies per haploid genome) appear to encode for their own transposition. The size of the direct repeat flanking the ingi/RIME retrotransposons is conserved (i.e., 12-bp), and a strong 11-bp consensus pattern precedes the 5'-direct repeat. The presence of a consensus pattern upstream of the retroelements was confirmed by the analysis of the base occurrence in 294 GSS containing 5'-adjacent ingi/RIME sequences. The conserved sequence is present upstream of ingis and RIMEs, suggesting that ingi-encoded enzymatic activities are used for retrotransposition of RIMEs, which are short nonautonomous retroelements. In conclusion, the ingi and RIME retroelements are not randomly distributed in the genome of T. brucei and are preceded by a conserved sequence, which may be the recognition site of the ingi-encoded endonuclease.     

Genomic signatures: tracing the origin of retroelements at the nucleotide level

We investigate the nucleotide sequences of 23 retroelements (4 mammalian retroviruses, 1 human, 3 yeast, 2 plant, and 13 invertebrate retrotransposons) in terms of their oligonucleotide composition in order to address the problem of relationship between retrotransposons and retroviruses, and the coadaptation of these retroelements to their host genomes. We have identified by computer analysis over-represented 3- through 6-mers in each sequence. Our results indicate retrotransposons are heterogeneous in contrast to retroviruses, suggesting different modes of evolution by slippage-like mechanisms. Moreover, we have calculated the Observed/Expected number ratio for each of the 256 tetramers and analysed the data using a multivariate approach. The tetramer composition of retroelement sequences appears to be influenced by host genomic factors like methylase activity. This revised version was published online in August 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

The innate antiretroviral factor APOBEC3G does not affect human LINE-1 retrotransposition in a cell culture assay

APOBEC3G (apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme catalytic polypeptide-like 3G) is an innate intracellular antiretroviral factor that can inhibit viral retroelements such as retroviruses and hepadnaviruses. However, it is unknown whether it can act on non-viral substrates. Retrotransposons are transposable elements that cumulatively account for about one third of the human genome. They are commonly classified in long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, which are strongly homologous to retroviruses, and non-LTR retrotransposons also known as L1 elements or LINE-1 (long interspersed nucleotide element-1) elements. Most of the L1 elements are defective and only a small number are very active in vivo, but they are responsible for nearby all of the retrotransposition in the human population. The cloning of active human L1 elements has allowed the development of tissue culture-based assays for measuring their retrotransposition potential. We used such an assay to demonstrate that APOBEC3G, which impairs the replication of exogenous retroelements, does not affect the replication of endogenous L1 retrotransposons.     

Origin,evolution, and distribution of different groups of non-LTR retrotransposons among eukaryotes

Non-LTR retrotransposons are an ancient group of retroelements. Twenty-one clades are distinguished today among non-LTR retrotransposons. The presence of different clades in the genome characterizes the diversity of non-LTR retrotransposons of the organism. This review presents a general picture of the evolution and distribution of different clades of non-LTR retrotransposons among the main taxa of eukaryotic organisms: protozoa, plants, fungi, and metazoa. Introduction in the analysis of new taxa and the use of new bioinformatic and experimental approaches can significantly extend our knowledge about non-LTR retrotransposons and their role in the evolution and functioning of eukaryotic genomes.     

Retroelements: tools for sex chromosome evolution

Many eukaryotic taxa inherit a heteromorphic sex chromosome pair. It is a generally accepted hypothesis that the sex chromosome pair is derived from a pair of homologous autosomes that has developed after the occurrence of a sex differentiator in an evolutionary process into two structurally and functionally different partners. In most of the analyzed systems the occurrence of the dominant sex differentiator is paralleled by the suppression of recombination within and close by that region. The recombinational isolation can spread in an evolutionary selection process from neighboring regions finally over the whole chromosome. Suppression of recombination strongly biases the distribution of retrotransposons in the genome. Our results and that from others indicate that the major force driving the evolution of Y chromosomes are retrotransposons, remodeling euchromatic chromosome structures into heterochromatic ones. In our model, intact or already eroded retrotransposons become trapped due to their inherent transposition mechanisms in non-recombining regions. The massive accumulation of retrotransposons interferes strongly with the activity of genes. We hypothesize that Y chromosome degeneration is a stepwise evolutionary process: (1) Massive accumulation of retrotransposons occurs in the non-recombining regions. (2) Heterochromatic nucleation centers are formed as a consequence of genomic defense against invasive parasitic elements; the established nucleation centers become epigenetically inherited. (3) Spreading of heterochromatin from the nucleation centers into flanking regions induces in an adaptive process gene silencing of neighbored genes that could either be still intact or in an already eroded condition, e.g., showing point mutations, deletions, insertions; the retroelements should be subjects to the same forces of deterioration as the genes themselves. (4) Constitutive silenced genes are not committed to the same genetic selection pressure as active genes and therefore more exposed to the decay process. (5) Gene dosage balance is reestablished by the parallel evolution of dosage compensation mechanisms. The evolving secondary sex chromosomes, neo-X and neo-Y, of Drosophila miranda are revealed to be a unique and potent model system to catch the evolutionary Y deterioration process in progress.