Unambiguous correspondence and complementarity of the chemical properties of amino acids and anticodons of the genetic code

The chemical language of genetic code is proposed. As a result of chemical language application for the analysis of the modern genetic code, the existence of an unambiguous correspondence between the chemical properties of amino acids and their coding triplets (codons and anticodons) is shown. This confirms the hypothesis of the code chemical determination. The complementarity between the chemical properties of amino acids and their anticodons (but not the codons) has been found also to exist. This observation supports the hypothesis of the genetic code determination by the direct recognition and also underlines the primary role of anticodon in the origin of genetic code in comparison with codons.     

RNA-ligand chemistry: a testable source for the genetic code

In the genetic code, triplet codons and amino acids can be shown to be related by chemical principles. Such chemical regularities could be created either during the code's origin or during later evolution. One such chemical principle can now be shown experimentally. Natural or particularly selected RNA binding sites for at least three disparate amino acids (arginine, isoleucine, and tyrosine) are enriched in codons for the cognate amino acid. Currently, in 517 total nucleotides, binding sites contain 2.4-fold more codon sequences than surrounding nucleotides. The aggregate probability of this enrichment is 10(-7) to 10(-8), had codons and binding site sequences been independent. Thus, at least some primordial coding assignments appear to have exploited triplets from amino acid binding sites as codons.     

On the origin and evolution of the genetic code

Two ideas have essentially been used to explain the origin of the genetic code: Crick's frozen accident and Woese's amino acid-codon specific chemical interaction. Whatever the origin and codon-amino acid correlation, it is difficult to imagine the sudden appearance of the genetic code in its present form of 64 codons coding for 20 amino acids without appealing to some evolutionary process. On the contrary, it is more reasonable to assume that it evolved from a much simpler initial state in which a few triplets were coding for each of a small number of amino acids. Analysis of genetic code through information theory and the metabolism of pyrimidine biosynthesis provide evidence that suggests that the genetic code could have begun in an RNA world with the two letters A and U grouped in eight triplets coding for seven amino acids and one stop signal. This code could have progressively evolved by making gradual use of letters G and C to end with 64 triplets coding for 20 amino acids and three stop signals. According to proposed evidence, DNA could have appeared after the four-letter structure was already achieved. In the newborn DNA world, T substituted U to get higher physicochemical and genetic stability.     

Stereochemical origins of the genetic code

The origin of the genetic code may be attributed to a postulated prebiological stereochemistry in which amino acid dimers, the trans -R,R'-diketopiperazines, interacted with prototype codon and anticodon nucleotide sequences. An intricately coupled stereochemistry is formulated which displays a binary logic for amino acid-codon recognition. It is shown that the diketopiperazine ring system can be inserted between any terminal pair of base paired nucleotides in a codon-anticodon structure with exact registration of complementary hydrogen bonding functional groups. This yields a codon-dimer-anticodon structure in which each amino acid residue is projected towards and interacts with a particular sequence of vicinal nucleotides on either codon or anticodon. The projection direction and the sequence of nucleotides encountered is a strongly coupled function of the choice of codon terminal nucleotide and the handedness of the amino acid. The reciprocal chemical nature of the complementary base pairs drives the selection of dimers containing quite dissimilar and chirally opposed amino acids. Application of the stereochemical model to the in vivo system leads to a general correlation for amino acid-codon assignments. The genetic code is restated in terms of the dimers selected. The profound symmetry of the code is elucidated and this proves useful for correlative and predictive purposes.     

RNA–Amino Acid Binding: A Stereochemical Era for the Genetic Code

By combining crystallographic and NMR structural data for RNA-bound amino acids within riboswitches, aptamers, and RNPs, chemical principles governing specific RNA interaction with amino acids can be deduced. Such principles, which we summarize in a “polar profile”, are useful in explaining newly selected specific RNA binding sites for free amino acids bearing varied side chains charged, neutral polar, aliphatic, and aromatic. Such amino acid sites can be queried for parallels to the genetic code. Using recent sequences for 337 independent binding sites directed to 8 amino acids and containing 18,551 nucleotides in all, we show a highly robust connection between amino acids and cognate coding triplets within their RNA binding sites. The apparent probability (P) that cognate triplets around these sites are unrelated to binding sites is ≅5.3 × 10⁻⁴⁵ for codons overall, and P ≅ 2.1 × 10⁻⁴⁶ for cognate anticodons. Therefore, some triplets are unequivocally localized near their present amino acids. Accordingly, there was likely a stereochemical era during evolution of the genetic code, relying on chemical interactions between amino acids and the tertiary structures of RNA binding sites. Use of cognate coding triplets in RNA binding sites is nevertheless sparse, with only 21% of possible triplets appearing. Reasoning from such broad recurrent trends in our results, a majority (approximately 75%) of modern amino acids entered the code in this stereochemical era; nevertheless, a minority (approximately 21%) of modern codons and anticodons were assigned via RNA binding sites. A Direct RNA Template scheme embodying a credible early history for coded peptide synthesis is readily constructed based on these observations.     

The origin of the genetic code.

A new approach to the origin of the genetic code is proposed based on some regularities in the nucleotide distribution pattern of the code. The relative amounts of various amino acids in primitive proteins were possibly different from those in organisms living today. The primordial ratio was supposed to shift to the modern one guided by the action of primitive nucleotides. Each primitive tRNA had a discriminator site and, distinguished from it, an anticodon site. It also postulated that primordially each amino acid could correspond to a wide variety of codons. During the course of the evolutionary change, a selective mechanism worked among the protobionts so that less frequent nucleotides became associated with more abundant amino acids in the primordial conditions,thus finally leading to the present codon catalogue.     

The genetic code--40 years on

The genetic code discovered 40 years ago, consists of 64 triplets (codons) of nucleotides. The genetic code is almost universal. The same codons are assigned to the same amino acids and to the same START and STOP signals in the vast majority of genes in animals, plants, and microorganisms. Each codon encodes for one of the 20 amino acids used in the synthesis of proteins. That produces some redundancy in the code and most of the amino acids being encoded by more than one codon. The two cases have been found where selenocysteine or pyrrolysine, that are not one of the standard 20 is inserted by a tRNA into the growing polypeptide.     

The origin of the genetic code

A new approach to the origin of the genetic code is proposed based on some regularities in the nucleotide distribution pattern of the code. The relative amounts of various amino acids in primitive proteins were possibly different from those in organisms living today. The primordial ratio was supposed to shift to the modern one guided by the action of primitive nucleotides. Each primitive tRNA had a discriminator site and, distinguished from it, an anticodon site. It is also postulated that primordially each amino acid could correspond to a wide variety of codons. During the course of the evolutionary change, a selective mechanism worked among the protobionts so that less frequent nucleotides became associated with more abundant amino acids in the primordial conditions, thus finally leading to the present codon catalogue.Presented at The International Seminar: The Origin of Life held in Moscow, August 2–7, 1974.     

Genetic code correlations: Differential rates of non-enzymatic activation of hydrophobic amino acids by ATP

The relative rates of non-enzymatic activation of several hydrophobic amino acids by ATP have been found to bear an interesting relationship to the ordering of these amino acids in the genetic anticode. All of these hydrophobic amino acids (phe, leu, val, ile and met) have adenylic acid, the most hydrophobic nucleotide, as the central and most important member of their anticodons, and the ordering of their relative rates of nonenzymatic activation by ATP has been found not to correlate with the ordering of the hydrophobicities of the amino acids themselves, but rather with the ordering of the average estimates of the hydrophobicities of their respective anticodonic dinucleotides. These data suggest that the genetic code is based not just on hydrophobic relationships or affinities between amino acids and nucleotides, but perhaps more importantly, on the total reaction chemistry between amino acids and nucleotides.     

Expansion of the genetic code in yeast: making life more complex

Proteins account for the catalytic and structural versatility displayed by all cells, yet they are assembled from a set of only 20 common amino acids. With few exceptions, only 61 nucleotide triplets also direct incorporation of these amino acids. Endeavors to expand the genetic code recently progressed to nucleus-containing cells, after Chin et al.1 transferred Escherichia coli genes for a mutant tyrosine-adaptor molecule and its synthetase into Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Transformed yeast cells were produced that exhibit efficient site-specific incorporation of non-biotic amino acids into proteins. This makes it likely that code complexity can be elevated experimentally in mammals.     

Physico-chemical basis of the genetic code origin: stereochemical analysis of interactions of amino acids and nucleotides based on the progene hypothesis

A progene hypothesis has been proposed earlier to explain the mechanism of origin of the self-reproducing genetic system. Progenes (precursors of the genetic system) are mixed anhydrides of an amino acid and deoxyribotrinucleotide at the 3'-gamma-terminal phosphate (NpNpNppp-AA); they are produced from dinucleotides (NpNp) and 3'-gamma-aminoacylnucleotidylates (Nppp-AA) as a result of specific interaction between amino acid and dinucleotide. The postulated mechanism of progene formation accounts for the selection of substances, including chirality, the origin of the genetic code as well as for the mechanisms of formation, self-reproduction and evolution of the simpliest genetic system ("gene--polypeptide"). A stereochemical analysis of the progene formation mechanism has allowed us to support the main statements of the hypothesis that relate to the origin of the genetic code and to selection of substances. Atomic groups that could be responsible for the specificity of interaction between dinucleotides and amino acids in progene formation have been revealed. Stereochemical evidence for the physicochemical basis of the origin of the existing genetic code have been produced: 1) a special role of the second nucleotide in the codon is demonstrated in amino acid coding by the progene hypothesis principle; 2) an advantage of T against U in such coding is demonstrated; 3) for 16 amino acids out of 20 an agreement has been obtained between the optimal dinucleotide as revealed by the stereochemical analysis and the codon dinucleotides; 4) an explanation for the third nucleotide selection mechanism is offered. A restoration of the prebiotic code, based on these results, has indicated that the code contains 32 codons, is statistical and group-wise. It encodes 7 groups of isofunctional amino acids: 3 overlapping groups of non-polar amino acids 1) medium-size hydrophobic amino acids (chiefly Val, n-Val and a-But), 2) small and medium-size non-polar amino acids (chiefly Ala Val, n-Val a-But and Gly), 3) small non-polar amino acids (Gly, Ala, a-But) and 4 groups of polar amino acids--1) hydroxy--+dicarbonic (Asp, Glu, Ser and Thr), 2) dicarbonic (Asp and Glu), 3) hydroxy (Ser and Thr) and 4) basic (Arg and Lys). The code includes about 20 amino acids among which are 15-17 canonical and a few common non-canonical. The prebiotic code explains many properties of the existing genetic code and is capable of evolving into the latter by way of a gradual replacement of the physicochemical coding mechanism by the enzymatic coding mechanism.     

The Historical Factor: The Biosynthetic Relationships Between Amino Acids and Their Physicochemical Properties in the Origin of the Genetic Code

Two forces are in general, hypothesized to have influenced the origin of the organization of the genetic code: the physicochemical properties of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships. In view of this, we have considered a model incorporating these two forces. In particular, we have studied the optimization level of the physicochemical properties of amino acids in the set of amino acid permutation codes that respects the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids. Where the properties of amino acids are represented by polarity and molecular volume we obtain indetermination percentages in the organization of the genetic code of approximately 40%. This indicates that the contingent factor played a significant role in structuring the genetic code. Furthermore, this result is in agreement with the genetic code coevolution hypothesis, which attributes a merely ancillary role to the properties of amino acids while it suggests that it was their biosynthetic relationships that organized the code. Furthermore, this result does not favor the stereochemical models proposed to explain the origin of the genetic code. On the other hand, where the properties of amino acids are represented by polarity alone, we obtain an indetermination percentage of at least 21.5%. This might suggest that the polarity distances played an important role and would therefore provide evidence in favor of the physicochemical hypothesis of genetic code origin. Although, overall, the analysis might have given stronger support to the latter hypothesis, this did not actually occur. The results are therefore discussed in the context of the different theories proposed to explain the origin of the genetic code. Received: 10 September 1996 / Accepted: 3 March 1997     

Laws governing degeneration of the genetic code

The laws governing degeneration of the genetic code are discussed below. Of fundamental importance in this context is the classification of the amino acids into groups on the basis of the physicochemical behaviour of their residues. From this, it is possible to formulate arithmetic relationships between the number of amino acids in the same group and the number of coding triplets.It is found that the degeneration of the genetic code obeys certain laws, the reasons for this being related to the number and the qualitative properties of the amino acids and triplets. The fact that the three bases of a coding triplet have different priorities must also be a critical factor.     

On the origin of the genetic code

It is argued that three chemical criteria determined the evolution of the genetic code: codon-anticodon pairing; codon-amino acid pairing; amino acid pairing. The first criterium determined the set of interactive nucleotides; the second, the set of nucleotides interactive with amino acids; the third, the set of mutually interactive amino acids. The code resulted from the intersection of these sets. This hypothesis explains the specificity and universality of the code as well as the “choice” of the standard amino acids and nucleotides from among those available in nature. The specific mechanism for codon-amino acid pairing assumed here is the “backwards” (Crick, 1967) Pelc-Welton (1966) models. Three types of evidence support “backwards” pairing: parallel genetic coding of amino acid pairs (Root-Bernstein, 1982); results of binding experiments by Saxinger and Ponnamperuma (1974); reinterpretation of Jungck's (1978) correlations between the properties of amino acids and their respective anticodon nucleotides. The inversion of the code to its present state occurred as a result of the evolution of tRNA molecules which supplanted parallel codon-amino acid interactions with antiparallel codon-anticodon ones. The paper concludes with suggestions for testing the hypothesis.     

Active site of an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase dissected by energy-transfer-dependent fluorescence.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases establish the rules of the genetic code by catalyzing attachment of amino acids to specific transfer RNAs (tRNAs) that bear the anticodon triplets of the code. Each of the 20 amino acids has its own distinct aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Here we use energy-transfer-dependent fluorescence from the nucleotide probe N-methylanthraniloyl dATP (mdATP) to investigate the active site of a specific aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Interaction of the enzyme with the cognate amino acid and formation of the aminoacyl adenylate intermediate were detected. In addition to providing a convenient tool to characterize enzymatic parameters, the probe allowed investigation of the role of conserved residues within the active site. Specifically, a residue that is critical for binding could be distinguished from one that is important for the transition state of adenylate formation. Amino acid binding and adenylate synthesis by two other aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases was also investigated with mdATP. Thus, a key step in the synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNA can in general be dissected with this probe.     

A hypothesis of the code of nerve impulses

There is probably only one information system in living nature — the macromolecular system including DNA, RNA and protein. Its unity for the genetic and nervous activity can be followed in the storage of information (heredity, memory) and in its processing (recombination and selection of both genetic and mental information). According to the hypothesis of the code of nerve impulses, nucleotide triplets of the nucleus, or more likely amino acids of the surface protein of the impulse generating area of a neuron, generate a limited variety of interspike intervals so that each amino acid corresponds to a certain interspike interval and this particular interval initiates by means of a specific neurotransmitter, the synthesis of the same amino acid (or nucleotide triplet) in the postsynaptic neuron. Thus, a series of impulses produces in the postsynaptic neuron a sequence of amino acids in a form of a polypeptide identical to the polypeptide of the presynaptic neuron.     

An extension of the coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code

Background  

The coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code suggests that the genetic code is an imprint of the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids. However, this theory does not seem to attribute a role to the biosynthetic relationships between the earliest amino acids that evolved along the pathways of energetic metabolism. As a result, the coevolution theory is unable to clearly define the very earliest phases of genetic code origin. In order to remove this difficulty, I here suggest an extension of the coevolution theory that attributes a crucial role to the first amino acids that evolved along these biosynthetic pathways and to their biosynthetic relationships, even when defined by the non-amino acid molecules that are their precursors.     

The origin of the genetic code: amino acids as cofactors in an RNA world.

The genetic code, understood as the specific assignment of amino acids to nucleotide triplets, might have preceded the existence of translation. Amino acids became utilized as cofactors by ribozymes in a metabolically complex RNA world. Specific charging ribozymes linked amino acids to corresponding RNA handles, which could basepair with different ribozymes, via an anticodon hairpin, and so deliver the cofactor to the ribozyme. Growing of the 'handle' into a presumptive tRNA was possible while function was retained and modified throughout. A stereochemical relation between some amino acids and cognate anticodons/codons is likely to have been important in the earliest assignments. Recent experimental findings, including selection for ribozymes catalyzing peptide-bond formation and those utilizing an amino acid cofactor, hold promise that scenarios of this major transition can be tested.