New insight into the biosynthesis and regulation of indole compounds in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Arabidopsis thaliana</Emphasis>

In spite of their silent and sessile life, plants are dynamic organisms that have developed advanced defence strategies in their adaptation to the pressure of herbivores and pathogens. Natural plant products play an important role as chemical weapons in this warfare. Characteristic of cruciferous plants is the synthesis of nitrogen- and sulphur-rich compounds, such as glucosinolates (Mikkelsen et al. 2002) and indole alkaloids (Pedras et al. 2000). Glucosinolates are believed to be largely non-toxic, but upon tissue disruption, they are hydrolyzed by endogenous -thioglucosidases (myrosinases) (Rask et al. 2000) to primarily isothiocyanates and nitriles, which have many biological activities. These include not only important roles as repellents against herbivorous insects and microorganisms, but also as volatile attraction of specialized insects (Wittstock and Halkier 2002). For humans, these compounds serve as cancer-preventive agents, biopesticides, and flavor compounds (Talalay and Fahey 2001). Indole alkaloids are phytoalexins and production of specific alkaloids is usually limited to only a few species. Cruciferous plants include the model plant Arabidopsis, which produces the indole alkaloid camalexin. This review will focus on the central role of indole-3-acetaldoxime (IAOx) in the biosynthesis of indole glucosinolates, camalexin, and the phytohormone IAA.     

HTS promiscuity analyses for accelerating decision making

Frequent hitters are compounds that are detected as a "hit" in multiple high-throughput screening (HTS) assays. Such behavior is specific (e.g., target family related) or unspecific (e.g., reactive compounds) or can result from a combination of such behaviors. Detecting such hits while predicting the underlying reason behind their promiscuous behavior is desirable because it provides valuable information not only about the compounds themselves but also about the assay methodology and target classes at hand. This information can also greatly reduce cost and time during HTS hit profiling. The present study exemplifies how to mine large HTS data repositories, such as the one at Boehringer Ingelheim, to identify frequent hitters, gain further insights into the causes of promiscuous behavior, and generate models for predicting promiscuous compounds. Applications of this approach are demonstrated using two recent large-scale HTS assays. The authors believe this analysis and its concrete applications are valuable tools for streamlining and accelerating decision-making processes during the course of hit discovery.     

Epigenetic Variations in Plant Hybrids and Their Potential Roles in Heterosis

Heterosis,one of the most important biological phenomena,refers to the phenotypic superiority of a hybrid over its genetically diverse parents with respect to many traits such as biomass,growth rate and yield.Despite its successful application in breeding and agronomic production of many crop and animal varieties,the molecular basis of heterosis remains elusive.The classic genetic explanations for heterosis centered on three hypotheses:dominance (Davenport,1908;Bruce,1910;Keeble and Pellew,1910;Jones,1917),overdominance (East,1908;Shull,1908) and epistasis (Powers,1944;Yu et al.,1997).However,these hypotheses are largely conceptual and not connected to molecular principles,and are therefore insufficient to explain the molecular basis of heterosis (Birchler et al.,2003).Recently,many studies have explored the molecular mechanism of heterosis in plants at a genome-wide level.These studies suggest that global differential gene expression between hybrids and parental lines potentially contributes to heterosis in plants (e.g.,Swanson-Wagner et al.,2006;Zhang et al.,2008;Wei et al.,2009;Song et al.,2010).Research suggests that genetic components,including cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors,are critical regulators of differential gene expression in hybrids (Hochholdinger and Hoecker,2007;Springer and Stupar,2007;Zhang et al.,2008).However,other research indicates that epigenetic components,the regulators of chromatin states and genome activity,also have the potential to impact heterosis (e.g.,Ha et al.,2009;He et al.,2010;Groszmann et al.,2011;Barber et al.,2012;Chodavarapu et al.,2012;Greaves et al.,2012a;Shen et al.,2012).     

Pathological and molecular mechanisms of prostate carcinogenesis: implications for diagnosis, detection, prevention, and treatment

Prostate cancer is an increasing threat throughout the world. As a result of a demographic shift in population, the number of men at risk for developing prostate cancer is growing rapidly. For 2002, an estimated 189,000 prostate cancer cases were diagnosed in the U.S., accompanied by an estimated 30,200 prostate cancer deaths [Jemal et al., 2002]. Most prostate cancer is now diagnosed in men who were biopsied as a result of an elevated serum PSA (>4 ng/ml) level detected following routine screening. Autopsy studies [Breslow et al., 1977; Yatani et al., 1982; Sakr et al., 1993], and the recent results of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) [Thompson et al., 2003], a large scale clinical trial where all men entered the trial without an elevated PSA (<3 ng/ml) were subsequently biopsied, indicate the prevalence of histologic prostate cancer is much higher than anticipated by PSA screening. Environmental factors, such as diet and lifestyle, have long been recognized contributors to the development of prostate cancer. Recent studies of the molecular alterations in prostate cancer cells have begun to provide clues as to how prostate cancer may arise and progress. For example, while inflammation in the prostate has been suggested previously as a contributor to prostate cancer development [Gardner and Bennett, 1992; Platz, 1998; De Marzo et al., 1999; Nelson et al., 2003], research regarding the genetic and pathological aspects of prostate inflammation has only recently begun to receive attention. Here, we review the subject of inflammation and prostate cancer as part of a "chronic epithelial injury" hypothesis of prostate carcinogenesis, and the somatic genome and phenotypic changes characteristic of prostate cancer cells. We also present the implications of these changes for prostate cancer diagnosis, detection, prevention, and treatment.     

Nontransgenic Genome Modification in Plant Cells

Zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) are a powerful tool for genome editing in eukaryotic cells. ZFNs have been used for targeted mutagenesis in model and crop species. In animal and human cells, transient ZFN expression is often achieved by direct gene transfer into the target cells. Stable transformation, however, is the preferred method for gene expression in plant species, and ZFN-expressing transgenic plants have been used for recovery of mutants that are likely to be classified as transgenic due to the use of direct gene-transfer methods into the target cells. Here we present an alternative, nontransgenic approach for ZFN delivery and production of mutant plants using a novel Tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based expression system for indirect transient delivery of ZFNs into a variety of tissues and cells of intact plants. TRV systemically infected its hosts and virus ZFN-mediated targeted mutagenesis could be clearly observed in newly developed infected tissues as measured by activation of a mutated reporter transgene in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) and petunia (Petunia hybrida) plants. The ability of TRV to move to developing buds and regenerating tissues enabled recovery of mutated tobacco and petunia plants. Sequence analysis and transmission of the mutations to the next generation confirmed the stability of the ZFN-induced genetic changes. Because TRV is an RNA virus that can infect a wide range of plant species, it provides a viable alternative to the production of ZFN-mediated mutants while avoiding the use of direct plant-transformation methods.Methods for genome editing in plant cells have fallen behind the remarkable progress made in whole-genome sequencing projects. The availability of reliable and efficient methods for genome editing would foster gene discovery and functional gene analyses in model plants and the introduction of novel traits in agriculturally important species (Puchta, 2002; Hanin and Paszkowski, 2003; Reiss, 2003; Porteus, 2009). Genome editing in various species is typically achieved by integrating foreign DNA molecules into the target genome by homologous recombination (HR). Genome editing by HR is routine in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells (Scherer and Davis, 1979) and has been adapted for other species, including Drosophila, human cell lines, various fungal species, and mouse embryonic stem cells (Baribault and Kemler, 1989; Venken and Bellen, 2005; Porteus, 2007; Hall et al., 2009; Laible and Alonso-González, 2009; Tenzen et al., 2009). In plants, however, foreign DNA molecules, which are typically delivered by direct gene-transfer methods (e.g. Agrobacterium and microbombardment of plasmid DNA), often integrate into the target cell genome via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) and not HR (Ray and Langer, 2002; Britt and May, 2003).Various methods have been developed to indentify and select for rare site-specific foreign DNA integration events or to enhance the rate of HR-mediated DNA integration in plant cells. Novel T-DNA molecules designed to support strong positive- and negative-selection schemes (e.g. Thykjaer et al., 1997; Terada et al., 2002), altering the plant DNA-repair machinery by expressing yeast chromatin remodeling protein (Shaked et al., 2005), and PCR screening of large numbers of transgenic plants (Kempin et al., 1997; Hanin et al., 2001) are just a few of the experimental approaches used to achieve HR-mediated gene targeting in plant species. While successful, these approaches, and others, have resulted in only a limited number of reports describing the successful implementation of HR-mediated gene targeting of native and transgenic sequences in plant cells (for review, see Puchta, 2002; Hanin and Paszkowski, 2003; Reiss, 2003; Porteus, 2009; Weinthal et al., 2010).HR-mediated gene targeting can potentially be enhanced by the induction of genomic double-strand breaks (DSBs). In their pioneering studies, Puchta et al. (1993, 1996) showed that DSB induction by the naturally occurring rare-cutting restriction enzyme I-SceI leads to enhanced HR-mediated DNA repair in plants. Expression of I-SceI and another rare-cutting restriction enzyme (I-CeuI) also led to efficient NHEJ-mediated site-specific mutagenesis and integration of foreign DNA molecules in plants (Salomon and Puchta, 1998; Chilton and Que, 2003; Tzfira et al., 2003). Naturally occurring rare-cutting restriction enzymes thus hold great promise as a tool for genome editing in plant cells (Carroll, 2004; Pâques and Duchateau, 2007). However, their wide application is hindered by the tedious and next to impossible reengineering of such enzymes for novel DNA-target specificities (Pâques and Duchateau, 2007).A viable alternative to the use of rare-cutting restriction enzymes is the zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), which have been used for genome editing in a wide range of eukaryotic species, including plants (e.g. Bibikova et al., 2001; Porteus and Baltimore, 2003; Lloyd et al., 2005; Urnov et al., 2005; Wright et al., 2005; Beumer et al., 2006; Moehle et al., 2007; Santiago et al., 2008; Shukla et al., 2009; Tovkach et al., 2009; Townsend et al., 2009; Osakabe et al., 2010; Petolino et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). Here too, ZFNs have been used to enhance DNA integration via HR (e.g. Shukla et al., 2009; Townsend et al., 2009) and as an efficient tool for the induction of site-specific mutagenesis (e.g. Lloyd et al., 2005; Zhang et al., 2010) in plant species. The latter is more efficient and simpler to implement in plants as it does not require codelivery of both ZFN-expressing and donor DNA molecules and it relies on NHEJ—the dominant DNA-repair machinery in most plant species (Ray and Langer, 2002; Britt and May, 2003).ZFNs are artificial restriction enzymes composed of a fusion between an artificial Cys₂His₂ zinc-finger protein DNA-binding domain and the cleavage domain of the FokI endonuclease. The DNA-binding domain of ZFNs can be engineered to recognize a variety of DNA sequences (for review, see Durai et al., 2005; Porteus and Carroll, 2005; Carroll et al., 2006). The FokI endonuclease domain functions as a dimer, and digestion of the target DNA requires proper alignment of two ZFN monomers at the target site (Durai et al., 2005; Porteus and Carroll, 2005; Carroll et al., 2006). Efficient and coordinated expression of both monomers is thus required for the production of DSBs in living cells. Transient ZFN expression, by direct gene delivery, is the method of choice for targeted mutagenesis in human and animal cells (e.g. Urnov et al., 2005; Beumer et al., 2006; Meng et al., 2008). Among the different methods used for high and efficient transient ZFN delivery in animal and human cell lines are plasmid injection (Morton et al., 2006; Foley et al., 2009), direct plasmid transfer (Urnov et al., 2005), the use of integrase-defective lentiviral vectors (Lombardo et al., 2007), and mRNA injection (Takasu et al., 2010).In plant species, however, efficient and strong gene expression is often achieved by stable gene transformation. Both transient and stable ZFN expression have been used in gene-targeting experiments in plants (Lloyd et al., 2005; Wright et al., 2005; Maeder et al., 2008; Cai et al., 2009; de Pater et al., 2009; Shukla et al., 2009; Tovkach et al., 2009; Townsend et al., 2009; Osakabe et al., 2010; Petolino et al., 2010; Zhang et al., 2010). In all cases, direct gene-transformation methods, using polyethylene glycol, silicon carbide whiskers, or Agrobacterium, were deployed. Thus, while mutant plants and tissues could be recovered, potentially without any detectable traces of foreign DNA, such plants were generated using a transgenic approach and are therefore still likely to be classified as transgenic. Furthermore, the recovery of mutants in many cases is also dependent on the ability to regenerate plants from protoplasts, a procedure that has only been successfully applied in a limited number of plant species. Therefore, while ZFN technology is a powerful tool for site-specific mutagenesis, its wider implementation for plant improvement may be somewhat limited, both by its restriction to certain plant species and by legislative restrictions imposed on transgenic plants.Here we describe an alternative to direct gene transfer for ZFN delivery and for the production of mutated plants. Our approach is based on the use of a novel Tobacco rattle virus (TRV)-based expression system, which is capable of systemically infecting its host and spreading into a variety of tissues and cells of intact plants, including developing buds and regenerating tissues. We traced the indirect ZFN delivery in infected plants by activation of a mutated reporter gene and we demonstrate that this approach can be used to recover mutated plants.     

A simple, no-wash cell adhesion-based high-throughput assay for the discovery of small-molecule regulators of the integrin CD11b/CD18

The leukocyte-specific integrin CD11b/CD18 plays a key role in the biological function of these cells and represents a validated therapeutic target for inflammatory diseases. Currently, the low affinity interaction between CD11b/CD18 integrin and its respective ligand poses a challenge in the development of cell-based adhesion assays for the high-throughput screening (HTS) environment. Here the authors describe a simple cell-based adhesion assay that can be readily used for HTS for the discovery of functional regulators of CD11b/CD18. The assay consistently produces acceptable Z' values (> 0.5) for HTS. After testing the assay using 2 established blocking antibodies as reference biologicals, the authors performed a proof-of-concept primary screen using a library of 6612 compounds and identified both agonist and antagonist hits.     

Disruption of ptLPD1 or ptLPD2, Genes That Encode Isoforms of the Plastidial Lipoamide Dehydrogenase,Confers Arsenate Hypersensitivity in Arabidopsis

Arsenic is a ubiquitous environmental poison that inhibits root elongation and seed germination to a variable extent depending on the plant species. To understand the molecular mechanisms of arsenic resistance, a genetic screen was developed to isolate arsenate overly sensitive (aos) mutants from an activation-tagged Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) population. Three aos mutants were isolated, and the phenotype of each was demonstrated to be due to an identical disruption of plastidial LIPOAMIDE DEHYDROGENASE1 (ptLPD1), a gene that encodes one of the two E3 isoforms found in the plastidial pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. In the presence of arsenate, ptlpd1-1 plants exhibited reduced root and shoot growth and enhanced anthocyanin accumulation compared with wild-type plants. The ptlpd1-1 plants accumulated the same amount of arsenic as wild-type plants, indicating that the aos phenotype was not due to increased arsenate in the tissues but to an increase in the innate sensitivity to the poison. Interestingly, a ptlpd1-4 knockdown allele produced a partial aos phenotype. Two loss-of-function alleles of ptLPD2 in Arabidopsis also caused elevated arsenate sensitivity, but the sensitivity was less pronounced than for the ptlpd1 mutants. Moreover, both the ptlpd1 and ptlpd2 mutants were more sensitive to arsenite than wild-type plants, and the LPD activity in isolated chloroplasts from wild-type plants was sensitive to arsenite but not arsenate. These findings show that the ptLPD isoforms are critical in vivo determinants of arsenite-mediated arsenic sensitivity in Arabidopsis and possible strategic targets for increasing arsenic tolerance.Arsenic (As) is a naturally occurring metalloid found in soil, water, and air, but anthropogenic activities, including smelting and fossil fuel combustion, have led to increased environmental exposure (Mandal and Suzuki, 2002). In the environment, As exists in both organic and inorganic forms. Arsenate [As(V)] is the principal inorganic form of As in aerobic soils, while arsenite [As(III)] is the main form found under anaerobic conditions (Marin et al., 1993; Onken and Hossner, 1995, 1996; Mandal and Suzuki, 2002; Masscheleyn et al., 2002).Both As(V) and As(III) are toxic to plants, inducing symptoms ranging from poor seed germination and inhibited root growth to death (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002; Lee et al., 2003; Ahsan et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2010). The modes of action of As(V) and As(III) differ, owing to their distinct chemical properties. As(V), with its structural similarity to phosphate, can compete with phosphate in oxidative phosphorylation, leading to the production of ADP-As(V) (Gresser, 1981). However, half-maximal stimulation of ADP-As(V) formation requires physiologically unlikely concentrations of approximately 0.8 mm As(V) (Moore et al., 1983). As(V) has been recently shown to enhance membrane fluidity, and thus membrane permeability, by binding and replacing phosphate or choline head groups (Tuan et al., 2008). The resulting damage to the membrane would disrupt the transport of mineral nutrients and water (Smith et al., 2010). As(V) can be promptly reduced in plants, including Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), to As(III) by endogenous As(V) reductases, so that often more than 90% of As in plant cells is in the form of As(III) (Zhao et al., 2009). As(III) readily forms covalent bonds with sulfhydryl groups, especially vicinal dithiols. Binding to the free thiols of proteins is believed to be the basis of As(III) toxicity, either by inhibiting activity directly or by disrupting protein structure. Many enzymes have been proposed to be targets leading to As(III) toxicity, and the As(III) sensitivity of some of these enzymes has been investigated in nonplant systems (Adamson and Stevenson, 1981; Cavigelli et al., 1996; Lynn et al., 1997; Hu et al., 1998; Kitchin and Wallace, 2008). Of the many potential protein targets, only the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (PDC) has been shown to be inactivated by physiologically relevant micromolar concentrations of As(III) (Hu et al., 1998), suggesting that PDC may be the primary target for As(III)-mediated cytotoxicity. However, little is known about the mechanism of As toxicity in vivo, especially in plants.Although As is phytotoxic, some plants species are resistant to high levels of As through avoidance mechanisms, while species of the Pteridaceae family of ferns hyperaccumulate As without toxic effects (Verbruggen et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009). As an analog of phosphate, As(V) is readily taken up by plants through high-affinity phosphate transporters encoded by the PHOSPHATE TRANSPORTER1 (PHT1) gene family (Shin et al., 2004; González et al., 2005; Catarecha et al., 2007). Except for the hyperaccumulating ferns, avoidance of As toxicity by resistant species is often accomplished by a decrease in phosphate uptake activity (Meharg and Hartley-Whitaker, 2002). Unlike As(V), the transport of As(III) is facilitated by aquaporin nodulin 26-like intrinsic proteins (Bienert et al., 2008; Isayenkov and Maathuis, 2008; Ma et al., 2008; Kamiya et al., 2009). In roots and fronds of hyperaccumulating ferns, As(III) is sequestered in the vacuole (Lombi et al., 2002; Pickering et al., 2006). Much of the As(III) taken up by nonaccumulating resistant species may be released back to the rhizosphere through an undefined efflux pathway (Zhao et al., 2009). As(III) that remains in tissues reacts with thiol-containing molecules, such as glutathione or phytochelatins, both of which are usually produced in greater abundance in response to As (Grill et al., 1987; Sneller et al., 1999; Schmöger et al., 2000; Schulz et al., 2008). As(III)-glutathione adducts can be sequestered in the vacuole (Dhankher et al., 2002; Bleeker et al., 2006). However, increased synthesis of glutathione or phytochelatins alone is unlikely to confer a very high level of tolerance (Zhao et al., 2009).To identify genes essential for As resistance in plants, we used a genetic screen to identify mutants of Arabidopsis that were hypersensitive to As(V). The screen was analogous to that used to isolate the salt overly sensitive (sos) mutants of Arabidopsis (Wu et al., 1996) that led to the identification of the SOS pathway for salt tolerance (Zhu, 2000, 2003). Our hypothesis was that arsenate overly sensitive (aos) mutants would reveal a different set of genes from those identified in mutants showing increased resistance to As(V).     

Involvement of a Broccoli COQ5 Methyltransferase in the Production of Volatile Selenium Compounds

Selenium (Se) is an essential micronutrient for animals and humans but becomes toxic at high dosage. Biologically based Se volatilization, which converts Se into volatile compounds, provides an important means for cleanup of Se-polluted environments. To identify novel genes whose products are involved in Se volatilization from plants, a broccoli (Brassica oleracea var italica) cDNA encoding COQ5 methyltransferase (BoCOQ5-2) in the ubiquinone biosynthetic pathway was isolated. Its function was authenticated by complementing a yeast coq5 mutant and by detecting increased cellular ubiquinone levels in the BoCOQ5-2-transformed bacteria. BoCOQ5-2 was found to promote Se volatilization in both bacteria and transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) plants. Bacteria expressing BoCOQ5-2 produced an over 160-fold increase in volatile Se compounds when they were exposed to selenate. Consequently, the BoCOQ5-2-transformed bacteria had dramatically enhanced tolerance to selenate and a reduced level of Se accumulation. Transgenic Arabidopsis expressing BoCOQ5-2 volatilized three times more Se than the vector-only control plants when treated with selenite and exhibited an increased tolerance to Se. In addition, the BoCOQ5-2 transgenic plants suppressed the generation of reactive oxygen species induced by selenite. BoCOQ5-2 represents, to our knowledge, the first plant enzyme that is not known to be directly involved in sulfur/Se metabolism yet was found to mediate Se volatilization. This discovery opens up new prospects regarding our understanding of the complete metabolism of Se and may lead to ways to modify Se-accumulator plants with increased efficiency for phytoremediation of Se-contaminated environments.Selenium (Se) has been studied extensively because of its essentiality for animals and humans and because of its toxicity at high dosage. Like a double-edged sword, Se is essential for the function of selenoenzymes but becomes toxic due to the nonspecific replacement of sulfur in sulfur-containing proteins (Stadtman, 1974; Brown and Shrift, 1982). The difference between beneficial and toxic levels of Se is quite narrow, making both Se deficiency and Se pollution common problems in different regions (Terry et al., 2000).Plants appear to be a promising solution for both sides of the Se problem (Pilon-Smits and LeDuc, 2009). Some crops have the ability to accumulate Se in health-beneficial chemical forms (Whanger, 2002; Dumont et al., 2006). Wheat (Triticum aestivum) grain grown in seleniferous soils accumulates selenomethionine (SeMet) and is one of the main dietary sources for Se (Lyons et al., 2005). Broccoli (Brassica oleracea var italica) has the ability to accumulate high level of Se-methylselenocysteine (SeMCys) and SeMet when grown on seleniferous soil (Cai et al., 1995). These selenoamino acids have been shown to be potent chemoprotective agents against cancer (Ip et al., 2000; Whanger, 2002). Other plant foods, such as garlic (Allium sativum) and Brazil nut (Bertholletia excelsa), have been enriched with Se and marketed as dietary Se supplements (Dumont et al., 2006). On the other hand, Se-hyperaccumulating plant species such as Astragalus bisulcatus and secondary accumulators such as Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) have attracted great interest for their ability to accumulate and volatilize Se for phytoremediation of Se-contaminated soils (Banuelos et al., 2007). Se volatilization converts highly toxic selenate and selenite into volatile dimethyl selenide (DMSe) and dimethyl diselenide (DMDSe), which are 500 to 700 times less toxic (Wilber, 1980). This process provides a low-cost, environmentally friendly, and highly efficient approach for cleanup of Se-contaminated environments (Banuelos et al., 2002; Pilon-Smits, 2005).The conversion of inorganic forms of Se into volatile Se in plants is believed to occur via the sulfur metabolic pathway, as outlined in Figure 1 (Terry et al., 2000; Sors et al., 2005). Se is present in soils predominantly as selenate (SeO₄²⁻) and selenite (SeO₃²⁻). While selenate is actively taken up into plants through sulfur transporters, selenite enters plant cells passively. The reduction of these oxidized forms of Se results in the production of selenoamino acids, such as selenocysteine (SeCys) and SeMet (Fig. 1). In Se-nonaccumulator plants, SeCys and SeMet are readily incorporated into proteins nonspecifically. In Se-accumulating plants, they are metabolized primarily into various nonproteinogenic selenoamino acids. These selenoamino acids can be further metabolized into the volatile Se compounds DMSe and DMDSe. While Se nonaccumulators mainly volatilize DMSe, accumulators primarily emit DMDSe (Terry et al., 2000; Ellis and Salt, 2003). Although Se volatilization is an important step in the Se cycle and provides a protective mechanism for plants and microorganisms to avoid toxicity in seleniferous environments, this metabolic process is not well understood.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Outline of Se metabolism in plants. The open arrows indicate that both selenate (SeO₄²⁻) and selenite (SeO₃²⁻) in soil are taken up into plants. Se metabolism from selenate involves a series of reduction steps to form selenide (Se²⁻), which is assimilated into the selenoamino acids SeCys and SeMet. These selenoamino acids can be methylated and further metabolized into the volatile Se compounds DMDSe and DMSe. Abbreviations not defined in the text: SeMMet, Se-methylmethionine; SeMCysMT, Se-methylselenocysteine methyltransferase; SMetMT, S-adenosyl-l-Met:l-Met S-methyltransferase.Several sulfur metabolic pathway enzymes have been evaluated for their roles in stimulating Se volatilization (Pilon-Smits and LeDuc, 2009). Cystathionine-γ-synthase is believed to be involved in the formation of SeMet. Overexpression of this enzyme resulted in a 2- to 3-fold increased rate of Se volatilization in transgenic Indian mustard (Van Huysen et al., 2003). S-Adenosyl-l-Met:l-Met S-methyltransferase is responsible for the methylation of SeMet to Se-methylselenomethionine. Overexpression of this enzyme in Escherichia coli produced a 10-fold increase in the rate of Se volatilization when the bacteria were supplied with SeMet (Tagmount et al., 2002). Similarly, expression of a Se-methylselenocysteine methyltransferase to methylate SeCys to SeMCys was shown to stimulate a 2- to 3-fold increase of Se volatilization in transgenic Indian mustard (LeDuc et al., 2004). Although increasing the activities of these known sulfur metabolism enzymes causes increased Se volatilization, additional proteins may be involved in this process (Van Hoewyk et al., 2008).Microorganisms adapted to high-Se-contaminated environments develop mechanisms to convert inorganic Se compounds into volatile forms. Several methyltransferases from these bacteria were reported to stimulate the emission of DMSe and DMDSe by unknown mechanisms (Ranjard et al., 2002, 2004; Swearingen et al., 2006). To identify novel plant genes whose products promote the production of volatile Se and to gain a better understanding of the metabolic processes associated with Se volatilization, we used a genomics-based approach to isolate genes from broccoli, a plant species known to have high capacity to volatilize Se (Duckart and Waldron, 1992; Terry et al., 1992). Using this approach, a broccoli COQ5 methyltransferase gene designated BoCOQ5-2 was isolated. Functional complementation of a yeast coq5 mutant by BoCOQ5-2 confirmed its identity. BoCOQ5-2 was found to promote Se volatilization when it was expressed in both bacteria and transgenic Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana).COQ5 genes encode C-methyltransferases involved in the biosynthesis of ubiquinone or coenzyme Q (Dibrov et al., 1997; Lee et al., 1997). Ubiquinone is an important lipid-soluble compound found in membranes of almost all living species. Ubiquinone is well known for its function as the electron carrier in the mitochondrial respiratory chain for energy production. Moreover, it is widely accepted that ubiquinone also participates in other cellular processes, such as control of cellular redox status and detoxification of harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS; Kawamukai, 2002; Turunen et al., 2004). Indeed, plants with high ubiquinone levels have been demonstrated to be able to suppress ROS generation (Ohara et al., 2004). Increased ubiquinone biosynthesis was found to be associated with increases in tolerance to a variety of stresses in both plants and other organisms (Ohara et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007). Se has been shown to induce the production of ROS in Arabidopsis (Tamaoki et al., 2008). Ubiquinone functioning as an antioxidant may protect cells against the oxidative stress to facilitate Se metabolism.BoCOQ5 methyltransferase represents, to our knowledge, the first plant enzyme that is not known to be involved in sulfur/Se metabolism yet mediates Se volatilization. The cloning and characterization of the methyltransferase from the economically important vegetable crop broccoli extends our understanding of factors affecting Se metabolism. Such information may lead to ways to generate modified Se-accumulator plants with increased efficiency in the phytoremediation of Se-contaminated soils.     

High content screening in neurodegenerative diseases

The functional annotation of genomes, construction of molecular networks and novel drug target identification, are important challenges that need to be addressed as a matter of great urgency. Multiple complementary 'omics' approaches have provided clues as to the genetic risk factors and pathogenic mechanisms underlying numerous neurodegenerative diseases, but most findings still require functional validation. For example, a recent genome wide association study for Parkinson's Disease (PD), identified many new loci as risk factors for the disease, but the underlying causative variant(s) or pathogenic mechanism is not known. As each associated region can contain several genes, the functional evaluation of each of the genes on phenotypes associated with the disease, using traditional cell biology techniques would take too long. There is also a need to understand the molecular networks that link genetic mutations to the phenotypes they cause. It is expected that disease phenotypes are the result of multiple interactions that have been disrupted. Reconstruction of these networks using traditional molecular methods would be time consuming. Moreover, network predictions from independent studies of individual components, the reductionism approach, will probably underestimate the network complexity. This underestimation could, in part, explain the low success rate of drug approval due to undesirable or toxic side effects. Gaining a network perspective of disease related pathways using HT/HC cellular screening approaches, and identifying key nodes within these pathways, could lead to the identification of targets that are more suited for therapeutic intervention. High-throughput screening (HTS) is an ideal methodology to address these issues. but traditional methods were one dimensional whole-well cell assays, that used simplistic readouts for complex biological processes. They were unable to simultaneously quantify the many phenotypes observed in neurodegenerative diseases such as axonal transport deficits or alterations in morphology properties. This approach could not be used to investigate the dynamic nature of cellular processes or pathogenic events that occur in a subset of cells. To quantify such features one has to move to multi-dimensional phenotypes termed high-content screening (HCS). HCS is the cell-based quantification of several processes simultaneously, which provides a more detailed representation of the cellular response to various perturbations compared to HTS. HCS has many advantages over HTS, but conducting a high-throughput (HT)-high-content (HC) screen in neuronal models is problematic due to high cost, environmental variation and human error. In order to detect cellular responses on a 'phenomics' scale using HC imaging one has to reduce variation and error, while increasing sensitivity and reproducibility. Herein we describe a method to accurately and reliably conduct shRNA screens using automated cell culturing and HC imaging in neuronal cellular models. We describe how we have used this methodology to identify modulators for one particular protein, DJ1, which when mutated causes autosomal recessive parkinsonism. Combining the versatility of HC imaging with HT methods, it is possible to accurately quantify a plethora of phenotypes. This could subsequently be utilized to advance our understanding of the genome, the pathways involved in disease pathogenesis as well as identify potential therapeutic targets.     

Detection of Legionella spp. and Legionella pneumophila in water samples of Spain by specific real-time PCR

Legionella pneumophila is the primary cause of the legionellosis diseases (90 %) (Yu et al. in J Infect Dis 186:127–128, 2002; Doleans et al. in J Clin Microbiol 42:458–460, 2004; Den Boer et al. in Clin Microbiol Infect 14:459–466, 2008). In this study, methodologies based on molecular biology were developed in order to provide a quick diagnosis of the bacterial presence in water samples of Spain. Multiplex real-time polymerase chain reaction assays were realized to target the 16S rRNA and macrophage infectivity potentiator (mip) genes of, respectively, Legionella spp. and L. pneumophila including in the design of an internal control. The results obtained by the culture and the gene amplification methods agreed in 94.44 % for the 16S rRNA gene, and a concordance of 66.67 % of the cases was obtained for the mip gene.