Expression of clock proteins in developing tooth

Morphological and functional changes during ameloblast and odontoblast differentiation suggest that enamel and dentin formation is under circadian control. Circadian rhythms are endogenous self-sustained oscillations with periods of 24h that control diverse physiological and metabolic processes. Mammalian clock genes play a key role in synchronizing circadian functions in many organs. However, close to nothing is known on clock genes expression during tooth development. In this work, we investigated the expression of four clock genes during tooth development. Our results showed that circadian clock genes Bmal1, clock, per1, and per2 mRNAs were detected in teeth by RT-PCR. Immunohistochemistry showed that clock protein expression was first detected in teeth at the bell stage (E17), being expressed in EOE and dental papilla cells. At post-natal day four (PN4), all four clock proteins continued to be expressed in teeth but with different intensities, being strongly expressed within the nucleus of ameloblasts and odontoblasts and down-regulated in dental pulp cells. Interestingly, at PN21 incisor, expression of clock proteins was down-regulated in odontoblasts of the crown-analogue side but expression was persisting in root-analogue side odontoblasts. In contrast, both crown and root odontoblasts were strongly stained for all four clock proteins in first molars at PN21. Within the periodontal ligament (PDL) space, epithelial rests of Malassez (ERM) showed the strongest expression among other PDL cells. Our data suggests that clock genes might be involved in the regulation of ameloblast and odontoblast functions, such as enamel and dentin protein secretion and matrix mineralization.     

Ameloblast differentiation in the human developing tooth: Effects of extracellular matrices

Tooth enamel is formed by epithelially-derived cells called ameloblasts, while the pulp dentin complex is formed by the dental mesenchyme. These tissues differentiate with reciprocal signaling interactions to form a mature tooth. In this study we have characterized ameloblast differentiation in human developing incisors, and have further investigated the role of extracellular matrix proteins on ameloblast differentiation. Histological and immunohistochemical analyses showed that in the human tooth, the basement membrane separating the early developing dental epithelium and mesenchyme was lost shortly before dentin deposition was initiated, prior to enamel matrix secretion. Presecretary ameloblasts elongated as they came into contact with the dentin matrix, and then shortened to become secretory ameloblasts. In situ hybridization showed that the presecretory stage of odontoblasts started to express type I collagen mRNA, and also briefly expressed amelogenin mRNA. This was followed by upregulation of amelogenin mRNA expression in secretory ameloblasts. In vitro, amelogenin expression was upregulated in ameloblast lineage cells cultured in Matrigel, and was further up-regulated when these cells/Matrigel were co-cultured with dental pulp cells. Co-culture also up-regulated type I collagen expression by the dental pulp cells. Type I collagen coated culture dishes promoted a more elongated ameloblast lineage cell morphology and enhanced cell adhesion via integrin α2β1. Taken together, these results suggest that the basement membrane proteins and signals from underlying mesenchymal cells coordinate to initiate differentiation of preameloblasts and regulate type I collagen expression by odontoblasts. Type I collagen in the dentin matrix then anchors the presecretary ameloblasts as they further differentiate to secretory cells. These studies show the critical roles of the extracellular matrix proteins in ameloblast differentiation.     

Establishment of primary cultures for mouse ameloblasts as a model of their lifetime

To understand how the properties of ameloblasts are spatiotemporally regulated during amelogenesis, two primary cultures of ameloblasts in different stages of differentiation were established from mouse enamel epithelium. Mouse primary ameloblasts (MPAs) prepared from immature enamel epithelium (MPA-I) could proliferate, whereas those from mature enamel epithelium (MPA-M) could not. MPA-M but not MPA-I caused apoptosis during culture. The mRNA expression of amelogenin, a marker of immature ameloblasts, was down-regulated, and that of enamel matrix serine proteiase-1, a marker of mature ameloblasts, was induced in MPA-I during culture. Using green fluorescence protein as a reporter, a visualized reporter system was established to analyze the promoter activity of the amelogenin gene. The region between -1102bp and -261bp was required for the reporter expression in MPA-I. These results suggest that MPAs are valuable in vitro models for investigation of ameloblast biology, and that the visualized system is useful for promoter analysis in MPAs.     

Maturation ameloblasts of the porcine tooth germ do not express amelogenin

 Amelogenins are the most abundant constituent in the enamel matrix of developing teeth. Recent investigations of rodent incisors and molar tooth germs revealed that amelogenins are expressed not only in secretory ameloblasts but also in maturation ameloblasts, although in relatively low levels. In this study, we investigated expression of amelogenin in the maturation stage of porcine tooth germs by in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry. Amelogenin mRNA was intensely expressed in ameloblasts from the differentiation to the transition stages, but was not detected in maturation stage ameloblasts. C-terminal specific anti-amelogenin antiserum, which only reacts with nascent amelogenin molecules, stained ameloblasts from the differentiation to the transition stages. This antiserum also stained the surface layer of immature enamel at the same stages. At the maturation stage, no immunoreactivity was found within the ameloblasts or the immature enamel. These results indicate that, in porcine tooth germs, maturation ameloblasts do not express amelogenins, suggesting that newly secreted enamel matrix proteins from the maturation ameloblast are not essential to enamel maturation occurring at the maturation stage. Accepted: 14 January 1999     

Carbonic anhydrase II regulates differentiation of ameloblasts via intracellular pH‐dependent JNK signaling pathway

Differentiation of ameloblasts from undifferentiated epithelial cells is controlled by diverse growth factors, as well as interactions between epithelium and mesenchyme. However, there is a considerable lack of knowledge regarding the precise mechanisms that control ameloblast differentiation and enamel biomineralization. We found that the expression level of carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) is strongly up‐regulated in parallel with differentiation of enamel epithelium tissues, while the enzyme activity of CA was also increased along with differentiation in ameloblast primary cultures. The expression level of amelogenin, a marker of secretory‐stage ameloblasts, was enhanced by ethoxzolamide (EZA), a CA inhibitor, as well as CAII antisense (CAIIAS), whereas the expression of enamel matrix serine proteinase‐1 (EMSP‐1), a marker for maturation‐stage ameloblasts, was suppressed by both. These agents also promoted ameloblast proliferation. In addition, inhibition of ameloblast differentiation by EZA and CAIIAS was confirmed using tooth germ organ cultures. Furthermore, EZA and CAIIAS elevated intracellular pH in ameloblasts, while experimental decreases in intracellular pH abolished the effect of CAIIAS on ameloblasts and triggered the activation of c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK). SP600125, a JNK inhibitor, abrogated the response of ameloblasts to an experimental decrease in intracellular pH, while the inhibition of JNK also impaired ameloblast differentiation. These results suggest a novel role for CAII during amelogenesis, that is, controlling the differentiation of ameloblasts. Regulation of intracellular pH, followed by activation of the JNK signaling pathway, may be responsible for the effects of CAII on ameloblasts. J. Cell. Physiol. 225: 709–719, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Enamel protein biosynthesis and secretion in mouse incisor secretory ameloblasts as revealed by high-resolution immunocytochemistry

Mouse secretory ameloblasts express a number of enamel proteins, which have been divided into amelogenin and enamelin subfamilies. We have used polyclonal antibodies to murine amelogenins to reveal enamel proteins in mouse ameloblasts using the protein A-gold immunocytochemical technique. Specific immunolabeling was detected over the extracellular enamel matrix and over the rough endoplasmic reticulum, the saccules of the Golgi apparatus, and the secretory granules of the ameloblasts. In addition, some lysosome-like granules were also labeled. Only background labeling was obtained over mitochondria, nuclei, cytosol, adjacent odontoblasts, and dentin. Quantitation of the intensity of labeling showed the presence of an increasing gradient along the secretory pathway, which may correspond to the concentration or the maturation of these proteins as they are processed by the cell. These findings indicate that the ameloblast displays an intracellular distribution of its secretory products similar to that of other merocrine secreting cells. The presence of enamel proteins in lysosomes suggests that crinophagy and/or resorption occurs in these cells.     

Physiological implications of DLX homeoproteins in enamel formation

Tooth development is a complex process including successive stages of initiation, morphogenesis, and histogenesis. The role of the Dlx family of homeobox genes during the early stages of tooth development has been widely analyzed, while little data has been reported on their role in dental histogenesis. The expression pattern of Dlx2 has been described in the mouse incisor; an inverse linear relationship exists between the level of Dlx2 expression and enamel thickness, suggesting a role for Dlx2 in regulation of ameloblast differentiation and activity. In vitro data have revealed that DLX homeoproteins are able to regulate the expression of matrix proteins such as osteocalcin. The aim of the present study was to analyze the expression and function of Dlx genes during amelogenesis. Analysis of Dlx2/LacZ transgenic reporter mice, Dlx2 and Dlx1/Dlx2 null mutant mice, identified spatial variations in Dlx2 expression within molar tooth germs and suggests a role for Dlx2 in the organization of preameloblastic cells as a palisade in the labial region of molars. Later, during the secretory and maturation stages of amelogenesis, the expression pattern in molars was found to be similar to that described in incisors. The expression patterns of the other Dlx genes were examined in incisors and compared to Dlx2. Within the ameloblasts Dlx3 and Dlx6 are expressed constantly throughout presecretory, secretory, and maturation stages; during the secretory phase when Dlx2 is transitorily switched off, Dlx1 expression is upregulated. These data suggest a role for DLX homeoproteins in the morphological control of enamel. Sequence analysis of the amelogenin gene promoter revealed five potential responsive elements for DLX proteins that are shown to be functional for DLX2. Regulation of amelogenin in ameloblasts may be one method by which DLX homeoproteins may control enamel formation. To conclude, this study establishes supplementary functions of Dlx family members during tooth development: the participation in establishment of dental epithelial functional organization and the control of enamel morphogenesis via regulation of amelogenin expression.     

Reuptake of extracellular amelogenin by dental epithelial cells results in increased levels of amelogenin mRNA through enhanced mRNA stabilization

Amelogenin is an extracellular matrix protein secreted by ameloblasts and is a major component of enamel matrix. Recently, in addition to their role in enamel formation, the biological activity of enamel proteins in the process of cell differentiation has recently become widely appreciated. In this study, we examined the biological activity of amelogenin on ameloblast differentiation. Recombinant mouse amelogenin (rm-amelogenin) enhanced the expression of endogenous amelogenin mRNA in a cultured dental epithelial cell line (HAT-7), despite a lack of increased amelogenin promoter activity. To solve this discrepancy, we analyzed the effects of rm-amelogenin on the stability of amelogenin mRNA. The half-life of amelogenin mRNA is extremely short, but in the presence of rm-amelogenin its half-life was extended three times longer than the control. Furthermore, we showed the entry of exogenous fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated rm-amelogenin into the cytoplasm of HAT-7 cells. It follows from our results that exogenous amelogenin increases amelogenin mRNA levels through stabilization of mRNA in the cytoplasm of HAT-7 cells. Here we speculated that during differentiation, dental epithelial cells utilize a unique mechanism for increasing the production of amelogenin, the reuptake of secreted amelogenin.     

Altering biomineralization by protein design

To create a bioceramic with unique materials properties, biomineralization exploits cells to create a tissue-specific protein matrix to control the crystal habit, timing, and position of the mineral phase. The biomineralized covering of vertebrate teeth is enamel, a distinctive tissue of ectodermal origin that is collagen-free. In forming enamel, amelogenin is the abundant protein that undergoes self-assembly to contribute to a matrix that guides its own replacement by mineral. Conserved domains in amelogenin suggest their importance to biomineralization. We used gene targeting in mice to replace native amelogenin with one of two engineered amelogenins. Replacement changed enamel organization by altering protein-to-crystallite interactions and crystallite stacking while diminishing the ability of the ameloblast to interact with the matrix. These data demonstrate that ameloblasts must continuously interact with the developing matrix to provide amelogenin-specific protein to protein, protein to mineral, and protein to membrane interactions critical to biomineralization and enamel architecture while suggesting that mutations within conserved amelogenin domains could account for enamel variations preserved in the fossil record.     

The odontogenic ameloblast‐associated protein (ODAM) cooperates with RUNX2 and modulates enamel mineralization via regulation of MMP‐20

We have previously reported that the odontogenic ameloblast‐associated protein (ODAM) plays important roles in enamel mineralization through the regulation of matrix metalloproteinase‐20 (MMP‐20). However, the precise function of ODAM in MMP‐20 regulation remains largely unknown. The aim of the present study was to uncover the molecular mechanisms responsible for MMP‐20 regulation. The subcellular localization of ODAM varies in a stage‐specific fashion during ameloblast differentiation. During the secretory stage of amelogenesis ODAM was localized to both the nucleus and cytoplasm of ameloblasts. However, during the maturation stage of amelogenesis, ODAM was observed in the cytoplasm and at the interface between ameloblasts and the enamel layer, but not in the nucleus. Secreted ODAM was detected in the conditioned medium of ameloblast‐lineage cell line (ALC) from days 14 to 21, which coincided with the maturation stage of amelogenesis. Interestingly, the expression of Runx2 and nuclear ODAM correlated with MMP‐20 expression in ALC. We therefore examined whether ODAM cooperates with Runx2 to regulate MMP‐20 and modulate enamel mineralization. Increased expression of ODAM and Runx2 augmented MMP‐20 expression, and Runx2 expression enhanced expression of ODAM, although overexpression of ODAM did not influence Runx2 expression. Conversely, loss of Runx2 in ALC decreased ODAM expression, resulting in down‐regulation of MMP‐20 expression. Increased MMP‐20 expression accelerated amelogenin processing during enamel mineralization. Our data suggest that Runx2 regulates the expression of ODAM and that nuclear ODAM serves an important regulatory function in the mineralization of enamel through the regulation of MMP‐20 apart from a different, currently unidentified, function of extracellular ODAM. J. Cell. Biochem. 111: 755–767, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Morphological and immunocytochemical analyses on the effects of diet-induced hypocalcemia on enamel maturation in the rat incisor.

During the maturation stage of amelogenesis, the loss of matrix proteins combined with an accentuated but regulated influx of calcium and phosphate ions into the enamel layer results in the "hardest" tissue of the body. The aim of the present investigation was to examine the effects of chronic hypocalcemia on the maturation of enamel. Twenty-one-day old male Wistar rats were given a calcium-free diet and deionized water for 28 days, while control animals received a normal chow. The rats were perfused with aldehyde and the mandibular incisors were processed for histochemical and ultrastructural analyses and for postembedding colloidal gold immunolabeling with antibodies to amelogenin, ameloblastin, and albumin. The maturation stage enamel organ in hypocalcemic rats exhibited areas with an apparent increase in cell number and the presence of cyst-like structures. In both cases the cells expressed signals for ameloblastin and amelogenin. The content of the cysts was periodic acid-Schiff- and periodic acid-silver nitrate-methanamine-positive and immunolabeled for amelogenin, ameloblastin, and albumin. Masses of a similar material were also found at the enamel surface in depressions of the ameloblast layer. In addition, there were accumulations of glycoproteinaceous matrix at the interface between ameloblasts and enamel. In decalcified specimens, the superficial portion of the enamel matrix sometimes exhibited the presence of tubular crystal "ghosts." The basal lamina, normally separating ameloblasts and enamel during the maturation stage, was missing in some areas. Enamel crystals extended within membrane invaginations at the apical surface of ameloblasts in these areas. Immunolabeling for amelogenin, ameloblastin, and albumin over enamel was variable and showed a heterogeneous distribution. In contrast, enamel in control rats exhibited a homogeneous labeling for amelogenin, a concentration of ameloblastin at the surface, and weak reactivity for albumin. These results suggest that diet-induced chronic hypocalcemia interferes with both cellular and extracellular events during enamel maturation.     

The tick tock of odontogenesis

Although a big deal of dental research is being focused to the understanding of early stages of tooth development, a huge gap exist on our knowledge on how the dental hard tissues are formed and how this process is controlled daily in order to produce very complex and diverse tooth shapes adapted for specific functions. Emerging evidence suggests that clock genes, a family of genes that controls circadian functions within our bodies, regulate also dental mineralized tissues formation. Enamel formation, for example, is subjected to rhythmical molecular signals that occur on short (24 h) periods and control the secretion and maturation of the enamel matrix. Accordingly, gene expression and ameloblast functions are also tightly modulated in regular daily intervals. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the circadian controls of dental mineralized tissues development with a special emphasis on amelogenesis.     

Enamel biomineralization defects result from alterations to amelogenin self-assembly

Enamel formation is a powerful model for the study of biomineralization. A key feature common to all biomineralizing systems is their dependency upon the biosynthesis of an extracellular organic matrix that is competent to direct the formation of the subsequent mineral phase. The major organic component of forming mouse enamel is the 180-amino-acid amelogenin protein (M180), whose ability to undergo self-assembly is believed to contribute to biomineralization of vertebrate enamel. Two recently defined domains (A and B) within amelogenin appear essential for this self-assembly. The significance of these two domains has been demonstrated previously by the yeast two-hybrid system, atomic force microscopy, and dynamic light scattering. Transgenic animals were used to test the hypothesis that the self-assembly domains identified with in vitro model systems also operate in vivo. Transgenic animals bearing either a domain-A-deleted or domain-B-deleted amelogenin transgene expressed the altered amelogenin exclusively in ameloblasts. This altered amelogenin participates in the formation an organic enamel extracellular matrix and, in turn, this matrix is defective in its ability to direct enamel mineralization. At the nanoscale level, the forming matrix adjacent to the secretory face of the ameloblast shows alteration in the size of the amelogenin nanospheres for either transgenic animal line. At the mesoscale level of enamel structural hierarchy, 6-week-old enamel exhibits defects in enamel rod organization due to perturbed organization of the precursor organic matrix. These studies reflect the critical dependency of amelogenin self-assembly in forming a competent enamel organic matrix and that alterations to the matrix are reflected as defects in the structural organization of enamel.     

Binding of amelogenin to MMP-9 and their co-expression in developing mouse teeth

Amelogenin is the most abundant matrix protein in enamel. Proper amelogenin processing by proteinases is necessary for its biological functions during amelogenesis. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) is responsible for the turnover of matrix components. The relationship between MMP-9 and amelogenin during tooth development remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin and they are co-expressed in ameloblasts during amelogenesis. We evaluated the distribution of both proteins in the mouse teeth using immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. At postnatal day 2, the spatial distribution of amelogenin and MMP-9 was co-localized in preameloblasts, secretory ameloblasts, enamel matrix and odontoblasts. At the late stages of mouse tooth development, expression patterns of amelogenin and MMP-9 were similar to that seen in postnatal day 2. Their co-expression was further confirmed by RT-PCR, Western blot and enzymatic zymography analyses in enamel organ epithelial and odontoblast-like cells. Immunoprecipitation assay revealed that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin. The MMP-9 cleavage sites in amelogenin proteins across species were found using bio-informative software program. Analyses of these data suggest that MMP-9 may be involved in controlling amelogenin processing and enamel formation.     

Clock-controlled mir-142-3p can target its activator, Bmal1

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: microRNAs (miRNAs) are shown to be involved in the regulation of circadian clock. However, it remains largely unknown whether miRNAs can regulate the core clock genes (Clock and Bmal1). RESULTS: In this study, we found that mir-142-3p directly targeted the 3'UTR of human BMAL1 and mouse Bmal1. The over-expression (in 293ET and NIH3T3 cells) and knockdown (in U87MG cells) of mir-142-3p reduced and up-regulated the Bmal1/BMAL1 mRNA and protein levels, respectively. Moreover, the expression level of mir-142-3p oscillated in serum-shocked NIH3T3 cells and the results of ChIP and luciferase reporter assays suggested that the expression of mir-142-3p was directly controlled by CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimers in NIH3T3 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that mir-142-3p can directly target the 3'UTR of Bmal1. In addition, the expression of mir-142-3p is controlled by CLOCK/BMAL1 heterodimers, suggesting a potential negative feedback loop consisting of the miRNAs and the core clock genes. These findings open new perspective for studying the molecular mechanism of circadian clock.     

Feeding Period Restriction Alters the Expression of Peripheral Circadian Rhythm Genes without Changing Body Weight in Mice

Accumulating evidence suggests that the circadian clock is closely associated with metabolic regulation. However, whether an impaired circadian clock is a direct cause of metabolic dysregulation such as body weight gain is not clearly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that body weight gain in mice is not significantly changed by restricting feeding period to daytime or nighttime. The expression of peripheral circadian clock genes was altered by feeding period restriction, while the expression of light-regulated hypothalamic circadian clock genes was unaffected by either a normal chow diet (NCD) or a high-fat diet (HFD). In the liver, the expression pattern of circadian clock genes, including Bmal1, Clock, and Per2, was changed by different feeding period restrictions. Moreover, the expression of lipogenic genes, gluconeogenic genes, and fatty acid oxidation-related genes in the liver was also altered by feeding period restriction. Given that feeding period restriction does not affect body weight gain with a NCD or HFD, it is likely that the amount of food consumed might be a crucial factor in determining body weight. Collectively, these data suggest that feeding period restriction modulates the expression of peripheral circadian clock genes, which is uncoupled from light-sensitive hypothalamic circadian clock genes.