Cytokinin inhibits a subset of diageotropica-dependent primary auxin responses in tomato

Many aspects of plant development are regulated by antagonistic interactions between the plant hormones auxin and cytokinin, but the molecular mechanisms of this interaction are not understood. To test whether cytokinin controls plant development through inhibiting an early step in the auxin response pathway, we compared the effects of cytokinin with those of the dgt (diageotropica) mutation, which is known to block rapid auxin reactions of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) hypocotyls. Long-term cytokinin treatment of wild-type seedlings phenocopied morphological traits of dgt plants such as stunting of root and shoot growth, reduced elongation of internodes, reduced apical dominance, and reduced leaf size and complexity. Cytokinin treatment also inhibited rapid auxin responses in hypocotyl segments: auxin-stimulated elongation, H(+) secretion, and ethylene synthesis were all inhibited by cytokinin in wild-type hypocotyl segments, and thus mimicked the impaired auxin responsiveness found in dgt hypocotyls. However, cytokinin failed to inhibit auxin-induced LeSAUR gene expression, an auxin response that is affected by the dgt mutation. In addition, cytokinin treatment inhibited the auxin induction of only one of two 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthase genes that exhibited impaired auxin inducibility in dgt hypocotyls. Thus, cytokinin inhibited a subset of the auxin responses impaired in dgt hypocotyls, suggesting that cytokinin blocks at least one branch of the DGT-dependent auxin response pathway.     

Mutations in the Diageotropica (Dgt) gene uncouple patterned cell division during lateral root initiation from proliferative cell division in the pericycle

In angiosperms, root branching requires a continuous re-initiation of new root meristems. Through some unknown mechanism, in most eudicots pericycle cells positioned against the protoxylem change identity and initiate patterned division, leading to formation of lateral root primordia that further develop into lateral roots. This process is auxin-regulated. We have observed that three mutations in the Diageotropica (Dgt) gene in tomato prevent primordium formation. Detailed analysis of one of these mutants, dgt1-1, demonstrated that the mutation does not abolish the proliferative capacity of the xylem-adjacent pericycle in the differentiated root portion. Files of shortened pericycle cells found in dgt1-1 roots were unrelated to primordium formation. Auxin application stimulated this unusual proliferation, leading to formation of a multi-layered xylem-adjacent pericycle, but did not rescue the primordium formation. In contrast to wild type, auxin could not induce any cell divisions in the pericycle of the most distal dgt1-1 root-tip portion. In wild-type roots, the Dgt gene promoter was expressed strongly in lateral root primordia starting from their initiation, and on auxin treatment was induced in the primary root meristem. Auxin level and distribution were altered in dgt1-1 root tissues, as judged by direct auxin measurements, and the tissue-specific expression of an auxin-response reporter was altered in transgenic plants. Together, our data demonstrate that the Dgt gene product, a type-A cyclophilin, is essential for morphogenesis of lateral root primordia, and that the dgt mutations uncouple patterned cell division in lateral root initiation from proliferative cell division in the pericycle.     

Induction of Arabidopsis defense genes by virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas syringae strains and by a cloned avirulence gene.

We developed a model system to study the signal transduction pathways leading to the activation of Arabidopsis thaliana genes involved in the defense against pathogen attack. Here we describe the identification and characterization of virulent and avirulent Pseudomonas syringae strains that elicit disease or resistance symptoms when infiltrated into Arabidopsis leaves. The virulent and avirulent strains were characterized by determining growth of the pathogen in Arabidopsis leaves and by measuring accumulation of mRNA corresponding to Arabidopsis phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), beta-1,3-glucanase (BG), and chalcone synthase (CHS) genes in infected leaves. The virulent strain, P. syringae pv maculicola ES4326, multiplied 10(5)-fold in Arabidopsis leaves and strongly elicited BG1, BG2, and BG3 mRNA accumulation but had only a modest effect on PAL mRNA accumulation. In contrast, the avirulent strain, P. syringae pv tomato MM1065, multiplied less than 10-fold in leaves and had only a minimal effect on BG1, BG2, and BG3 mRNA accumulation, but it induced PAL mRNA accumulation. No accumulation of CHS mRNA was found with either ES4326 or MM1065. We also describe the cloning of a putative avirulence (avr) gene from the avirulent strain MM1065 that caused the virulent strain ES4326 to grow less well in leaves and to strongly elicit PAL but not BG1 and BG3 mRNA accumulation. These results suggest that the Arabidopsis PAL and BG genes may be activated by distinct signal transduction pathways and show that differences in plant gene induction by virulent and avirulent strains can be attributed to a cloned presumptive avr gene.     

The cell wall-modifying xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase LeXTH1 is expressed during the defence reaction of tomato against the plant parasite Cuscuta reflexa

A suppressive subtractive hybridization technique was used to identify genes, which were induced during the early phases of the interaction between dodder (Cuscuta reflexa), a phanerogamic parasite, and its incompatible host plant tomato. One of the identified genes encodes a tomato xyloglucan endotransglycosylase/hydrolase (XTH)--an enzyme involved in cell wall elongation and restructuring. The corresponding LeXTH1 mRNA accumulated 6 h after attachment of the parasite. In contrast, wounding did not influence the expression level. Subsequent to LeXTH1 mRNA accumulation, an increase in XTH activity at the infection sites as well as in adjacent tissues was observed. The effect of IAA on LeXTH1 expression was analyzed because the concentration of this phytohormone is known to increase in the tomato tissue during the interaction with the parasite. LeXTH1 mRNA accumulation was in fact induced by external application of auxin. However, in the auxin-insensitive tomato mutant diageotropica, Cuscuta induced LeXTH1-mRNA accumulated with a time course similar to wild type tomato. Thus, auxin appears not to be an essential signal for infection-induced LeXTH1 activation. Our data suggest a role for xyloglucan transglycosylation in defence reactions associated with the incompatible tomato- Cuscuta interaction.     

Arabidopsis SHY2/IAA3 inhibits auxin-regulated gene expression

In Arabidopsis, SHY2 encodes IAA3, a member of the auxin-induced Aux/IAA family. Gain-of-function mutations in SHY2/IAA3 cause enlarged cotyledons, short hypocotyls, and altered auxin-regulated root development. Here we show that the gain-of-function mutation shy2-2 decreases both the induction and repression of auxin-regulated genes, suggesting that SHY2/IAA3 acts as a negative regulator in auxin signaling. shy2-2 affects auxin induction of many previously characterized primary response genes, implying that it might repress primary auxin responses. In addition, shy2-2 also affects expression of multiple auxin-nonresponsive genes. Light regulates expression of SHY2/IAA3, suggesting a possible link between light and auxin response pathways.     

Auxin-regulated genes encoding cell wall-modifying proteins are expressed during early tomato fruit growth

An expansin gene, LeExp2, was isolated from auxin-treated, etiolated tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum cv T5) hypocotyls. LeExp2 mRNA expression was restricted to the growing regions of the tomato hypocotyl and was up-regulated during incubation of hypocotyl segments with auxin. The pattern of expression of LeExp2 was also studied during tomato fruit growth, a developmental process involving rapid cell enlargement. The expression of genes encoding a xyloglucan endotransglycosylase (LeEXT1) and an endo-1, 4-beta-glucanase (Cel7), which, like LeExp2, are auxin-regulated in etiolated hypocotyls (C. Catalá, J.K.C. Rose, A.B. Bennett [1997] Plant J 12: 417-426), was also studied to examine the potential for synergistic action with expansins. LeExp2 and LeEXT1 genes were coordinately regulated, with their mRNA accumulation peaking during the stages of highest growth, while Cel7 mRNA abundance increased and remained constant during later stages of fruit growth. The expression of LeExp2, LeEXT1, and Cel7 was undetectable or negligible at the onset of and during fruit ripening, which is consistent with a specific role of these genes in regulating cell wall loosening during fruit growth, not in ripening-associated cell wall disassembly.     

Approaches to understanding auxin action

The effects of auxin on plant growth and development have been studied for decades, but the molecular mechanisms of auxin action remain unknown. These mechanisms have primarily been investigated by characterization of auxin physiology mutants and analysis of auxin-binding proteins and auxin-regulated genes. These efforts are now converging, since some mutants have recently been shown to have altered expression of specific auxin-binding proteins and auxin-regulated genes. The features of these proteins and genes are providing the first tantalizing clues to the organization of auxin signal transduction pathways.     

Effect of auxins and plant oligosaccharides on root formation and elongation growth of mung bean hypocotyls

The interaction of auxins – IAA, IBA or NAA – with galactoglucomannan oligosaccharides (GGMOs) on adventitious root formation and elongation growth of mung bean hypocotyl cuttings was studied. GGMOs induced adventitious roots in the absence of auxins; however, their effect was lower compared with IBA or NAA. On the other hand, in the presence of auxins, GGMOs inhibited adventitious root induction. Their effect depended on the concentration of oligosaccharides and the type of auxin used. The highest inhibition effect of GGMOs at a concentration of 10⁻⁸ M in the presence of IBA and NAA was observed. In the presence of IAA their inhibition was non-significant in regard to the concentration. The interaction of auxins with GGMOs resulted in the formation of adventitious roots on a shorter part of hypocotyls compared with the effect of auxins alone. However, roots were induced more extensively along the hypocotyls treated with GGMOs compared with the control. GGMOs inhibited the length of induced adventitious roots in the presence of IAA, while in combination with IBA or NAA they were ineffective. The elongation of hypocotyls induced by IAA or IBA was inhibited by GGMOs, too. However, in the presence of NAA or by endogenous growth they were without any significant effect on elongation growth. These findings suggest that GGMOs in certain concentrations might inhibit rooting and the elongation process dependant on auxin used.     

Characterization of the auxin-regulated par gene from tobacco mesophyll protoplasts.

The auxin-regulated par gene from tobacco mesophyll protoplasts was characterized in detail to deduce its possible function. An homology search of the par gene in the NBRF databases revealed that the par gene has homology to the stringent starvation protein (ssp) gene of Escherichia coli, which is induced under starved conditions and binds in an equimolar ratio to a holoenzyme of RNA polymerase. Hence, it is supposed that the par gene product could play a similar role to that of ssp. Although sequence homology of the par gene to the Gmhsp 26-A gene from soybean was observed, both genes were shown to respond differently to plant hormones and stresses. Gmhsp 26-A is induced by heat shock, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), cytokinin and abscisic acid (ABA), whereas the par gene was induced only by auxins. Furthermore, cycloheximide treatment prevents 2,4-D-mediated accumulation of Gmhsp 26-A mRNA, but not that of par mRNA. Both par and Gmhsp 26-A respond to CdCl2, but splicing of the par pre-mRNA proceeded in a normal way, whereas splicing off the Gmhsp 26-A pre-mRNA was inhibited. Hence, the par and Gmhsp 26-A genes should have a common ancestor, but have evolved in different directions. Detailed time-course experiments confirmed that the par gene was induced immediately after the addition of auxin and expressed upon the initiation of meristematic activity in tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. As the par gene was induced by the sole treatment of cycloheximide, it was proposed that the par gene belongs to a category of 'superinduction' genes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">SINGLE FLOWER TRUSS</Emphasis> regulates the transition and maintenance of flowering in tomato

The characterisation of the single flower truss ( sft) mutant phenotype of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), as well as its genetic interactions with other mutations affecting FALSIFLORA ( FA) and SELF PRUNING ( SP) genes, has revealed that SFT is a key gene in the control of floral transition and floral meristem identity. The single sft mutation produces a late-flowering phenotype in both long-day and short-day conditions. In combination with fa, a mutation affecting the tomato gene orthologous to LFY, sft completely blocks the transition to flowering in this species. Thus, the phenotype of the sft fa double mutants indicates that SFT and FA participate in two parallel pathways that regulate the switch from vegetative to reproductive phase in tomato, and that both genes are indispensable for flowering. On the other hand, the replacement of flowers by vegetative shoots observed in the sft inflorescence suggests that SFT regulates flower meristem identity during inflorescence development of tomato. In addition to these two main functions, SFT is involved in the development of both flowers and sympodial shoots of tomato. First, the mutation produces a partial conversion of sepals into leaves in the first floral whorl, and a reduction in the number of floral organs, particularly carpels. Secondly, the sympodial development in the mutant plants is altered, which can be related to the interaction between SFT and SP, a gene controlling the number of nodes in sympodial shoots. In fact, we have found that the sft phenotype is epistatic to that of sp, and that the level of SP mRNA in the apical buds of sft around flowering is reduced. SFT can therefore co-ordinate the regulation of two simultaneous developmental processes in the tomato apical shoot, the promotion of flowering in one sympodial segment and the vegetative development of the next segment.     

Systematic analysis of specific and nonspecific auxin effects on endocytosis and trafficking

The phytohormone auxin and its directional transport through tissues are intensively studied. However, a mechanistic understanding of auxin-mediated feedback on endocytosis and polar distribution of PIN auxin transporters remains limited due to contradictory observations and interpretations. Here, we used state-of-the-art methods to reexamine the auxin effects on PIN endocytic trafficking. We used high auxin concentrations or longer treatments versus lower concentrations and shorter treatments of natural indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and synthetic naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) auxins to distinguish between specific and nonspecific effects. Longer treatments of both auxins interfere with Brefeldin A-mediated intracellular PIN2 accumulation and also with general aggregation of endomembrane compartments. NAA treatment decreased the internalization of the endocytic tracer dye, FM4-64; however, NAA treatment also affected the number, distribution, and compartment identity of the early endosome/trans-Golgi network, rendering the FM4-64 endocytic assays at high NAA concentrations unreliable. To circumvent these nonspecific effects of NAA and IAA affecting the endomembrane system, we opted for alternative approaches visualizing the endocytic events directly at the plasma membrane (PM). Using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we saw no significant effects of IAA or NAA treatments on the incidence and dynamics of clathrin foci, implying that these treatments do not affect the overall endocytosis rate. However, both NAA and IAA at low concentrations rapidly and specifically promoted endocytosis of photo-converted PIN2 from the PM. These analyses identify a specific effect of NAA and IAA on PIN2 endocytosis, thus, contributing to its polarity maintenance and furthermore illustrate that high auxin levels have nonspecific effects on trafficking and endomembrane compartments.

Natural and synthetic auxins affect various aspects of the endomembrane system at high concentrations, but promote clathrin-mediated endocytosis of the PIN2 auxin transporter at low concentrations.     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">p</Emphasis>-Chlorophenoxyisobutyric acid impairs auxin response for gravity-regulated peg formation in cucumber (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Cucumis sativus</Emphasis>) seedlings

Cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) seedlings form a specialized protuberance, the peg, on the transition zone between the hypocotyl and the root. When cucumber seeds germinate in a horizontal position, the seedlings develop a peg on the lower side of the transition zone. To verify the role of auxin action in peg formation, we examined the effect of the anti-auxin, p-chlorophenoxyisobutyric acid (PCIB), on peg formation and mRNA accumulation of auxin-regulated genes. Application of PCIB to cucumber seedlings inhibited peg formation. The application of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) competed with PCIB and induced peg formation. Furthermore, application of PCIB decreased auxin-inducible CsIAA1 mRNA and increased auxin-repressible CsGRP1 mRNA in the lower side of the transition zone. The differential accumulation of CsIAA1 and CsGRP1 mRNAs in the transition zone of cucumber seedlings grown in a horizontal position was smaller in the PCIB-treated seedlings. These results demonstrate that endogenous auxin redistributes and induces the differential expression of auxin-regulated genes, and ultimately results in the suppression or induction of peg formation in the gravistimulated transition zone of cucumber seedlings.     

The AXR1 and AUX1 genes of Arabidopsis function in separate auxin-response pathways

The recessive mutations aux1 and axr1 of Arabidopsis confer resistance to the plant hormone auxin. The axr1 mutants display a variety of morphological defects. In contrast, the only morphological defect observed in aux1 mutants is a loss of root gravitropism. To learn more about the function of these genes in auxin response, the expression of the auxin-regulated gene SAUR-AC1 in mutant and wild-type plants has been examined. It has been found that axr1 plants display a pronounced deficiency in auxin-induced accumulation of SAUR-AC1 mRNA in seedlings as well as rosette leaves and mature roots. In contrast, the aux1 mutation has a modest effect on auxin induction of SAUR-AC1. To determine if the AUX1 and AXR1 genes interact to facilitate auxin response, plants which are homozygous for both aux1 and axr1 mutations have been constructed and characterized. The two mutations are additive in their effects on auxin response, suggesting that each mutation confers resistance by a different mechanism. However, the morphology of double mutant plants indicates that there is an inter-action between the AXR1 and AUX1 genes. In mature plants, the aux1-7 mutation acts to partially suppress the morphological defects conferred by the axr1-12 mutation. This suppression is not accompanied by an increase in auxin response, as measured by SAUR-AC1 expression, suggesting that the interaction between the AUX1 and AXR1 genes is indirect.