BMP‐2 modulates β‐catenin signaling through stimulation of Lrp5 expression and inhibition of β‐TrCP expression in osteoblasts

Canonical BMP and Wnt signaling pathways play critical roles in regulation of osteoblast function and bone formation. Recent studies demonstrate that BMP‐2 acts synergistically with β‐catenin to promote osteoblast differentiation. To determine the molecular mechanisms of the signaling cross‐talk between canonical BMP and Wnt signaling pathways, we have used primary osteoblasts and osteoblast precursor cell lines 2T3 and MC3T3‐E1 cells to investigate the effect of BMP‐2 on β‐catenin signaling. We found that BMP‐2 stimulates Lrp5 expression and inhibits the expression of β‐TrCP, the F‐box E3 ligase responsible for β‐catenin degradation and subsequently increases β‐catenin protein levels in osteoblasts. In vitro deletion of the β‐catenin gene inhibits osteoblast proliferation and alters osteoblast differentiation and reduces the responsiveness of osteoblasts to the BMP‐2 treatment. These findings suggest that BMP‐2 may regulate osteoblast function in part through modulation of the β‐catenin signaling. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 896–905, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Peptide drugs accelerate BMP‐2‐induced calvarial bone regeneration and stimulate osteoblast differentiation through mTORC1 signaling

Both W9 and OP3‐4 were known to bind the receptor activator of NF‐κB ligand (RANKL), inhibiting osteoclastogenesis. Recently, both peptides were shown to stimulate osteoblast differentiation; however, the mechanism underlying the activity of these peptides remains to be clarified. A primary osteoblast culture showed that rapamycin, an mTORC1 inhibitor, which was recently demonstrated to be an important serine/threonine kinase for bone formation, inhibited the peptide‐induced alkaline phosphatase activity. Furthermore, both peptides promoted the phosphorylation of Akt and S6K1, an upstream molecule of mTORC1 and the effector molecule of mTORC1, respectively. In the in vivo calvarial defect model, W9 and OP3‐4 accelerated BMP‐2‐induced bone formation to a similar extent, which was confirmed by histomorphometric analyses using fluorescence images of undecalcified sections. Our data suggest that these RANKL‐binding peptides could stimulate the mTORC1 activity, which might play a role in the acceleration of BMP‐2‐induced bone regeneration by the RANKL‐binding peptides.     

Chondrogenesis on BMP‐6 loaded chitosan scaffolds in stationary and dynamic cultures

We originally investigated the suitability of chitosan scaffolds loaded with bone morphogenetic protein 6 (BMP‐6) in both stationary and dynamic conditions for cartilage tissue engineering. In the first part of the present study, ATDC5 murine chondrogenic cells were seeded in chitosan and BMP‐6 loaded chitosan scaffolds and cultured for 28 days under static conditions. In the following part, we examined the influence of dynamic cultivation conditions over BMP‐6 loaded chitosan scaffolds by using rotating bioreactor with perfusion (RCMW?). Tissue engineered constructs were characterized by 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐2,5‐diphenyl‐tetrazoliumbromide (MTT) assay, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and biochemical assays for glycosaminoglycans (GAG) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and collagen Type II quantification. At the end of 4 weeks static incubation period high levels of GAG (21.22 mg/g dry weight), DNA amounts (1.37 mg/g dry weight) and collagen Type II amounts (1.94 µg/g dry weight) were achieved for BMP‐6 loaded chitosan scaffolds compared to chitosan scaffolds. However, the results obtained from morphological observations suggested hypertrophic differentiation of ATDC5 cells in the presence of BMP‐6 under stationary conditions. The influence of mechanical stimulation appeared significantly with differentiated cells, cultured under dynamic conditions, showing the effect of retaining their phenotypes without hypertrophy. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009; 104: 601–610 © 2009 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Electric field and current density distribution in an anatomical head model during transcranial direct current stimulation for tinnitus treatment

Tinnitus is considered an auditory phantom percept. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been proposed as a new approach for tinnitus treatment including, as potential targets of interest, either the temporal and temporoparietal cortex or prefrontal areas. This study investigates and compares the spatial distribution of the magnitude of the electric field and the current density in the brain tissues during tDCS of different brain targets. A numerical method was applied on a realistic human head model to calculate these field distributions in different brain structures, such as the cortex, white matter, cerebellum, hippocampus, medulla oblongata, pons, midbrain, thalamus, and hypothalamus. Moreover, the same distributions were evaluated along the auditory pathways. Results of this study show that tDCS of the left temporoparietal cortex resulted in a widespread diffuse distribution of the magnitude of the electric fields (and also of the current density) on an area of the cortex larger than the target brain region. On the contrary, tDCS of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex resulted in a stimulation mainly concentrated on the target itself. Differences in the magnitude distribution were also found on the structures along the auditory pathways. A sensitivity analysis was also performed, varying the electrode position and the human head models. Accurate estimation of the field distribution during tDCS in different regions of the head could be valuable to better determine and predict efficacy of tDCS for tinnitus suppression.     

Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on balance improvement: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic tool to improve balance and optimize rehabilitation strategies. However, current literature shows the methodological heterogeneity of tDCS protocols and results, hindering any clear conclusions about the effects of tDCS on postural control.

Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness of tDCS on postural control, and identify the most beneficial target brain areas and the effect on different populations.

Methods: Two independent reviewers selected randomized tDCS clinical-trials studies from PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and reference lists of retrieved articles published between 1998 and 2017. Most frequently reported centre of pressure (COP) variables were selected for meta-analysis. Other postural control outcomes were discussed in the review.

Results: Thirty studies were included in the systematic review, and 11 were submitted to a meta-analysis. A reduction of COP displacement area has been significantly achieved by tDCS, evidencing an improvement in balance control. Individuals with cerebral palsy (CP) and healthy young adults are mostly affected by stimulation. The analysis of the impact of tDCS over different brain areas revealed a significant effect after primary motor cortex (M1) stimulation, however, with no clear results after cerebellar stimulation due to divergent results among studies.

Conclusions: tDCS appears to improve balance control, more evident in healthy and CP subjects. Effects are observed when primary MI is stimulated. Cerebellar stimulation should be better investigated.     

Electrical stimulation modulates osteoblast proliferation and bone protein production through heparin‐bioactivated conductive scaffolds

Electrical fields are known to interact with human cells. This principle has been explored to regulate cellular activities for bone tissue regeneration. In this work, Saos‐2 cells were cultured on conductive scaffolds made of biodegradable poly(L ‐lactide) and the heparin‐containing, electrically conducting polypyrrole (PPy/HE) to study their reaction to electrical stimulation (ES) mediated through such scaffolds. Both the duration and intensity of ES enhanced cell proliferation, generating a unique electrical intensity and temporal “window” within which osteoblast proliferation was upmodulated in contrast to the downmodulation or ineffectiveness in other ES regions. The favourable ES intensity (200 mV/mm) was further investigated in terms of the gene activation and protein production of two important osteoblast markers characterised by extracellular matrix maturation and mineralisation, that is alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and osteocalcin (OC). Both genes were found activated and the relevant protein production increased significantly following ES. In contrast, ES in the down‐modulation region (400 mV/mm) suppressed the production of both ALP and OC. This work demonstrated that important osteoblast markers can be modulated with specific ES parameters mediated through conductive polymer substrates, providing a unique strategy for bone tissue engineering. Bioelectromagnetics 34:189–199, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

经颅直流电刺激联合益生菌对脑卒中后认知功能障碍患者的作用

探讨经颅直流电刺激（tDCS）联合益生菌对脑卒中后认知功能障碍（PSCI）患者认知功能和肠道菌群的影响。

按随机数字表法将2020年6月至2021年6月我院收治的150例PSCI患者分为对照组和观察组,各75例。对照组患者给予tDCS治疗,观察组患者给予tDCS联合益生菌治疗。采用蒙特利尔认知功能评估量表（MoCA）和简易智力状态检查量表（MMSE）评估患者治疗前后的认知功能。采用荧光定量PCR法检测患者治疗前后肠道菌群数量变化。比较两组患者认知功能、肠道菌群、临床疗效以及不良反应发生情况。

治疗后,观察组患者肠道双歧杆菌和乳杆菌数量较治疗前显著升高,且双歧杆菌和乳杆菌数量显著高于对照组;而大肠埃希菌和肠球菌数量较治疗前显著降低,且大肠埃希菌和肠球菌数量显著低于对照组（均P＜0.05）。治疗后,两组患者MoCA和MMSE评分均升高,且观察组高于对照组（均P＜0.05）。观察组患者临床总有效率显著高于对照组（90.67% vs 78.67%,χ² = 12.482,P＜0.001）。对照组和观察组患者的不良反应发生情况比较差异无统计学意义（χ² = 0.150,P = 0.699）。

tDCS联合益生菌治疗能够有效改善PSCI患者的认知功能和肠道菌群状态,且不良反应少,安全系数高,值得临床推广。

     

Regulation of adipose‐tissue‐derived stromal cell orientation and motility in 2D‐ and 3D‐cultures by direct‐current electrical field

Cell alignment and motility play a critical role in a variety of cell behaviors, including cytoskeleton reorganization, membrane‐protein relocation, nuclear gene expression, and extracellular matrix remodeling. Direct current electric field (EF) in vitro can direct many types of cells to align vertically to EF vector. In this work, we investigated the effects of EF stimulation on rat adipose‐tissue‐derived stromal cells (ADSCs) in 2D‐culture on plastic culture dishes and in 3D‐culture on various scaffold materials, including collagen hydrogels, chitosan hydrogels and poly(L‐lactic acid)/gelatin electrospinning fibers. Rat ADSCs were exposed to various physiological‐strength EFs in a homemade EF‐bioreactor. Changes of morphology and movements of cells affected by applied EFs were evaluated by time‐lapse microphotography, and cell survival rates and intracellular calcium oscillations were also detected. Results showed that EF facilitated ADSC morphological changes, under 6 V/cm EF strength, and that ADSCs in 2D‐culture aligned vertically to EF vector and kept a good cell survival rate. In 3D‐culture, cell galvanotaxis responses were subject to the synergistic effect of applied EF and scaffold materials. Fast cell movement and intracellular calcium activities were observed in the cells of 3D‐culture. We believe our research will provide some experimental references for the future study in cell galvanotaxis behaviors.     

Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial magnetic or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)—From insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction

Noninvasive stimulation of the brain by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has driven important discoveries in the field of human memory functions. Stand-alone or in combination with other brain mapping techniques noninvasive brain stimulation can assess issues such as location and timing of brain activity, connectivity and plasticity of neural circuits and functional relevance of a circumscribed brain area to a given cognitive task. In this emerging field, major advances in technology have been made in a relatively short period. New stimulation protocols and, especially, the progress in the application of tDCS have made it possible to obtain longer and much clearer inhibitory or facilitatory effects even after the stimulation has ceased. In this introductory review, we outline the basic principles, discuss technical limitations and describe how noninvasive brain stimulation can be used to study human memory functions in vivo. Though improvement of cognitive functions through noninvasive brain stimulation is promising, it still remains an exciting challenge to extend the use of TMS and tDCS from research tools in neuroscience to the treatment of neurological and psychiatric patients.