Neuronal Polarity

The assembly of functional neuronal networks in the developing animal relies on the polarization of neurons, i.e., the formation of a single axon and multiple dendrites. Breaking the symmetry of neurons depends on cytoskeletal rearrangements. In particular, axon specification requires local dynamic instability of actin and stabilization of microtubules. The polarized cytoskeleton also provides the basis for selective trafficking and retention of cellular components in the future somatodendritic or axonal compartments. Hence, these mechanisms are not only essential to achieve neuronal polarization, but also to maintain it. Different extracellular and intracellular signals converge on the regulation of the cytoskeleton. Most notably, Rho GTPases, PI3K, Ena/VASP, cofilin and SAD kinases are major intracellular regulators of neuronal polarity. Analyzing polarity signals under physiological conditions will provide a better understanding of how neurons can be induced to repolarize under pathological conditions, i.e., to regenerate their axons after central nervous system (CNS) injury.One ambitious aim in cellular biology is to unravel the molecular mechanisms driving cellular asymmetry and polarization. The polarity of neurons is particularly dramatic as neurons undergo complex morphological rearrangements to assemble into neuronal circuits and propagate signals. They start as round neuronal spheres, gradually adopting a complex morphology by forming one long axon and several shorter dendrites to eventually connect to other neurons via synapses. Neuronal compartments segregate into molecularly and functionally distinct zones. For example, signal input takes place at the postsynaptic densities where a chemical signal elicits electric postsynaptic potentials. These potentials are integrated along the dendritic tree and cell body to trigger an action potential arising at the axon hillock and propagating further along the axon. At their terminals, the electrical signal is reconverted into a chemical signal by the release of synaptic vesicles containing neurotransmitter.Neurons maintain their polarity throughout life by different intracellular mechanisms and molecular signals. During the last decade, cell biological and molecular approaches helped to discover many of the molecules and signaling mechanisms regulating neuronal polarity (Yoshimura et al. 2006; Arimura and Kaibuchi 2007; Witte and Bradke 2008). The aim of this article is to summarize the current knowledge and principles of breaking neuronal symmetry to generate functional neurons, and to discuss the future challenges in the field. The article covers two different topics: intrinsic mechanisms that govern symmetry breaking in the absence of external cues (in vitro systems) and the role of extracellular signaling in the establishment of neuronal polarity in vivo.     

Crucial polarity regulators in axon specification

Cell polarization is critical for the correct functioning of many cell types, creating functional and morphological asymmetry in response to intrinsic and extrinsic cues. Neurons are a classical example of polarized cells, as they usually extend one long axon and short branched dendrites. The formation of such distinct cellular compartments (also known as neuronal polarization) ensures the proper development and physiology of the nervous system and is controlled by a complex set of signalling pathways able to integrate multiple polarity cues. Because polarization is at the basis of neuronal development, investigating the mechanisms responsible for this process is fundamental not only to understand how the nervous system develops, but also to devise therapeutic strategies for neuroregeneration. The last two decades have seen remarkable progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms responsible for mammalian neuronal polarization, primarily using cultures of rodent hippocampal neurons. More recent efforts have started to explore the role of such mechanisms in vivo. It has become clear that neuronal polarization relies on signalling networks and feedback mechanisms co-ordinating the actin and microtubule cytoskeleton and membrane traffic. The present chapter will highlight the role of key molecules involved in neuronal polarization, such as regulators of the actin/microtubule cytoskeleton and membrane traffic, polarity complexes and small GTPases.     

Regulation of neuronal polarity

The distinctive polarized morphology of neuronal cells is essential for the proper wiring of the nervous system. The rodent hippocampal neuron culture established about three decades ago has provided an amenable in vitro system to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying neuronal polarization, a process relying on highly regulated cytoskeletal dynamics, membrane traffic and localized protein degradation. More recent research in vivo has highlighted the importance of the extracellular environment and cell–cell interactions in neuronal polarity. Here, I will review some key signaling pathways regulating neuronal polarization and provide some insights on the complexity of this process gained from in vivo studies.     

Role of LKB1-SAD/MARK pathway in neuronal polarization

The formation of axon/dendrite polarity is critical for the neuron to perform its signaling function in the brain. Recent advance in our understanding of cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the development and maintenance of neuronal polarity has been greatly facilitated by the use of the culture system of dissociated hippocampal neurons. Among many polarization-related proteins, we here focus on the mammalian LKB1, the counterpart of the C. elegans Par-4, which is an upstream regulator among six Par (partitioning-defective) genes that act as master regulators of cell polarity in different cell types across evolutionary distant species. Recent studies have identified LKB1 and its downstream targets SAD/MARK kinases (mammalian homologs of Par-1) as key regulators of neuronal polarization and axon development in cultured neurons and in developing cortical neurons in vivo. We will review the properties of and interactions among proteins in this LKB1-SAD/MARK pathway, drawing upon information obtained from both neuronal and non-neuronal systems. Due to central role of the protein kinase A-dependent phosphorylation of LKB1 in the activation of this pathway, we will review recent findings on how cAMP and cGMP signaling may serve as antagonistic second messengers for axon/dendrite development, and how these cyclic nucleotides may mediate the action of extracellular polarizing factors by modulating the activity of the LKB1-SAD/MARK pathway.     

The region-specific activities of lipid rafts during axon growth and guidance

The generation and control of cell polarity is a fundamental mechanism for directed migration of the cell. In developing neurons, the axonal growth cone recognizes environmental molecular cues and migrates toward its correct target, thereby forming neuronal networks. The spatial information provided by environmental cues directs axon growth and guidance through generating polarity of intracellular signals and cytoskeletal organization in the growth cone. This polarization process is dependent on lipid rafts, specialized microdomains in the cell membrane. Lipid rafts in specific regions of the growth cone are involved in axon growth and guidance. For example, forward migration of the growth cone requires raft membranes in its leading front. Recent experiments have suggested that lipid rafts function as a platform for localized signaling downstream of adhesion molecules and guidance receptors. The rafts assemble into an active membrane domain that captures and reorganizes the cytoskeletal machinery. In this way, the spatial control of signaling through raft membranes plays a critical role in translating extracellular information into polarized motility of the growth cone.     

Neuronal polarity in C. elegans

Neuronal polarity sets the foundation for information processing and signal transmission within neural networks. However, fundamental question of how a neuron develops and maintains structurally and functionally distinct processes, axons and dendrites, is still an unclear. The simplicity and availability of practical genetic tools makes C. elegans as an ideal model to study neuronal polarity in vivo. In recent years, new studies have identified critical polarity molecules that function at different stages of neuronal polarization in C. elegans. This review focuses on how neurons guided by extrinsic cues, break symmetry, and subsequently recruit intracellular molecules to establish and maintain axon-dendrite polarity in vivo.     

Frizzled-5 Receptor Is Involved in Neuronal Polarity and Morphogenesis of Hippocampal Neurons

The Wnt signaling pathway plays important roles during different stages of neuronal development, including neuronal polarization and dendritic and axonal outgrowth. However, little is known about the identity of the Frizzled receptors mediating these processes. In the present study, we investigated the role of Frizzled-5 (Fzd5) on neuronal development in cultured Sprague-Dawley rat hippocampal neurons. We found that Fzd5 is expressed early in cultured neurons on actin-rich structures localized at minor neurites and axonal growth cones. At 4 DIV, Fzd5 polarizes towards the axon, where its expression is detected mainly at the peripheral zone of axonal growth cones, with no obvious staining at dendrites; suggesting a role of Fzd5 in neuronal polarization. Overexpression of Fzd5 during the acquisition of neuronal polarity induces mislocalization of the receptor and a loss of polarized axonal markers. Fzd5 knock-down leads to loss of axonal proteins, suggesting an impaired neuronal polarity. In contrast, overexpression of Fzd5 in neurons that are already polarized did not alter polarity, but decreased the total length of axons and increased total dendrite length and arborization. Fzd5 activated JNK in HEK293 cells and the effects triggered by Fzd5 overexpression in neurons were partially prevented by inhibition of JNK, suggesting that a non-canonical Wnt signaling mechanism might be involved. Our results suggest that, Fzd5 has a role in the establishment of neuronal polarity, and in the morphogenesis of neuronal processes, in part through the activation of the non-canonical Wnt mechanism involving JNK.     

Crosstalk of cell polarity signaling pathways

Cell polarity, the asymmetric organization of cellular components along one or multiple axes, is present in most cells. From budding yeast cell polarization induced by pheromone signaling, oocyte polarization at fertilization to polarized epithelia and neuronal cells in multicellular organisms, similar mechanisms are used to determine cell polarity. Crucial role in this process is played by signaling lipid molecules, small Rho family GTPases and Par proteins. All these signaling circuits finally govern the cytoskeleton, which is responsible for oriented cell migration, cell shape changes, and polarized membrane and organelle trafficking. Thus, typically in the process of cell polarization, most cellular constituents become polarized, including plasma membrane lipid composition, ion concentrations, membrane receptors, and proteins in general, mRNA, vesicle trafficking, or intracellular organelles. This review gives a brief overview how these systems talk to each other both during initial symmetry breaking and within the signaling feedback loop mechanisms used to preserve the polarized state.     

New insights into the molecular mechanisms specifying neuronal polarity in vivo

The polarization of axon and dendrites underlies the ability of neurons to integrate and transmit information in the brain. Important progress has been made toward the identification of the molecular mechanisms regulating neuronal polarization using primarily in vitro approaches such as dissociated culture of rodent hippocampal neurons. The predominant view emerging from this paradigm is that neuronal polarization is initiated by intrinsic activation of signaling pathways underlying the initial break in neuronal symmetry that precedes the future asymmetric growth of the axon. Recent evidence shows that (i) axon-dendrite polarization is specified when neurons engage migration in vivo, (ii) that a kinase pathway defined by LKB1and SAD-kinases (Par4/Par1 dyad) is required for proper neuronal polarization in vivo and that (iii) extracellular cues can play an instructive role during neuronal polarization. Here, we review some of these recent results and highlight future challenges in the field including the determination of how extracellular cues control intracellular responses underlying neuronal polarization in vivo.     

Substrate Topography Determines Neuronal Polarization and Growth In Vitro

The establishment of neuronal connectivity depends on the correct initial polarization of the young neurons. In vivo, developing neurons sense a multitude of inputs and a great number of molecules are described that affect their outgrowth. In vitro, many studies have shown the possibility to influence neuronal morphology and growth by biophysical, i.e. topographic, signaling. In this work we have taken this approach one step further and investigated the impact of substrate topography in the very early differentiation stages of developing neurons, i.e. when the cell is still at the round stage and when the first neurite is forming. For this purpose we fabricated micron sized pillar structures with highly reproducible feature sizes, and analyzed neurons on the interface of flat and topographic surfaces. We found that topographic signaling was able to attract the polarization markers of mouse embryonic neurons -N-cadherin, Golgi-centrosome complex and the first bud were oriented towards topographic stimuli. Consecutively, the axon was also preferentially extending along the pillars. These events seemed to occur regardless of pillar dimensions in the range we examined. However, we found differences in neurite length that depended on pillar dimensions. This study is one of the first to describe in detail the very early response of hippocampal neurons to topographic stimuli.     

A Highlights from MBoC Selection: Global Up-Regulation of Microtubule Dynamics and Polarity Reversal during Regeneration of an Axon from a Dendrite

Axon regeneration is crucial for recovery after trauma to the nervous system. For neurons to recover from complete axon removal they must respecify a dendrite as an axon: a complete reversal of polarity. We show that Drosophila neurons in vivo can convert a dendrite to a regenerating axon and that this process involves rebuilding the entire neuronal microtubule cytoskeleton. Two major microtubule rearrangements are specifically induced by axon and not dendrite removal: 1) 10-fold up-regulation of the number of growing microtubules and 2) microtubule polarity reversal. After one dendrite reverses its microtubules, it initiates tip growth and takes on morphological and molecular characteristics of an axon. Only neurons with a single dendrite that reverses polarity are able to initiate tip growth, and normal microtubule plus-end dynamics are required to initiate this growth. In addition, we find that JNK signaling is required for both the up-regulation of microtubule dynamics and microtubule polarity reversal initiated by axon injury. We conclude that regulation of microtubule dynamics and polarity in response to JNK signaling is key to initiating regeneration of an axon from a dendrite.     

Spinophilin participates in information transfer at immunological synapses

The highly polarized architecture of neurons is important for their function. Experimental data based on dominant-negative approaches suggest that the tumor suppressor adenomatous polyposis coli (APC), a regulator of Wnt signaling and the cytoskeleton, regulates polarity of neuroectodermal precursors and neurons, helping specify one neurite as the axon, promoting its outgrowth, and guiding axon pathfinding. However, such dominant-negative approaches might affect processes in which APC is not essential. We completely removed both APCs from Drosophila melanogaster larval neural precursors and neurons, testing whether APCs play universal roles in neuronal polarity. Surprisingly, APCs are not essential for asymmetric cell division or the stereotyped division axis of central brain (CB) neuroblasts, although they do affect cell cycle progression and spindle architecture. Likewise, CB, lobular plug, and mushroom body neurons do not require APCs for polarization, axon outgrowth, or, in the latter two cases, axon targeting. These data suggest that proposed cytoskeletal roles for APCs in mammals should be reassessed using loss of function tools.     

Axonal transport versus dendritic transport

Neurons have polarized processes for information output and input, axons, and dendrites. This polarized architecture is essential for the neuronal function. An increasing number of molecular components that mediate neuronal polarity establishment have been characterized over the past few years. The vast majority of these molecules include proteins that act in scaffolding protein complexes to sustain the polarized anchoring of molecules. In addition, more signaling and cytoskeleton-associated proteins have been proposed for establishment of polarity. It has become evident that dendritic and axonal transport of molecules depends on scaffolding/adaptor proteins that are recognized by molecular motors. Current and future research in the neuronal cell polarity will be focused on how different cargo molecules transmit their signals to the cytoskeleton and change its dynamic properties to affect the rate and direction of vesicular movement. In this review, we discuss recent evidence that scaffolding proteins can regulate motor motility and guidance by a mechanism of substrate-cytoskeletal coupling and amino acid modifications during polarized transport.     

Polarized signaling: basolateral receptor localization in epithelial cells by PDZ-containing proteins

Extracellular signals are normally presented to one surface of epithelial cells and to one end of neurons, and so neuronal and epithelial cell signaling is inherently polarized. Another aspect of signaling polarity is that receptors are often asymmetrically distributed on the surfaces of polarized cells. Recent evidence from studies of Caenorhabditis elegans shows that signaling polarity plays an important role in development. The underlying mesoderm induces the overlying ectoderm to form the vulva, and asymmetric distribution of the signal receptor on the basolateral surface of the epithelium is crucial for this signaling. In neurons, the localization of neurotransmitter receptors and ion channels at synapses allows neurons to be exquisitely sensitive to synaptic inputs. Exciting recent reports suggest that receptor localization to neuronal synapses and the basolateral membrane domains of epithelia may involve a common molecular mechanism involving localization by PDZ-containing proteins.     

Mathematical Analysis of Spontaneous Emergence of Cell Polarity

Cell polarization, in which intracellular substances are asymmetrically distributed, enables cells to carry out specialized functions. While cell polarity is often induced by intracellular or extracellular spatial cues, spontaneous polarization (the so-called symmetry breaking) may also occur in the absence of spatial cues. Many computational models have been used to investigate the mechanisms of symmetry breaking, and it was proved that spontaneous polarization occurs when the lateral diffusion of inactive signaling molecules is much faster than that of active signaling molecules. This conclusion leaves an important question of how, as observed in many biological systems, cell polarity emerges when active and inactive membrane-bound molecules diffuse at similar rates while cycling between cytoplasm and membrane takes place. The recent studies of Rätz and Röger showed that, when the cytosolic and membrane diffusion are very different, spontaneous polarization is possible even if the membrane-bound species diffuse at the same rate. In this paper, we formulate a two-equation non-local reaction-diffusion model with general forms of positive feedback. We apply Turing stability analysis to identify parameter conditions for achieving cell polarization. Our results show that spontaneous polarization can be achieved within some parameter ranges even when active and inactive signaling molecules diffuse at similar rates. In addition, different forms of positive feedback are explored to show that a non-local molecule-mediated feedback is important for sharping the localization as well as giving rise to fast dynamics to achieve robust polarization.     

Double-Edge Sword of Sustained ROCK Activation in Prion Diseases through Neuritogenesis Defects and Prion Accumulation

In prion diseases, synapse dysfunction, axon retraction and loss of neuronal polarity precede neuronal death. The mechanisms driving such polarization defects, however, remain unclear. Here, we examined the contribution of RhoA-associated coiled-coil containing kinases (ROCK), key players in neuritogenesis, to prion diseases. We found that overactivation of ROCK signaling occurred in neuronal stem cells infected by pathogenic prions (PrP^Sc) and impaired the sprouting of neurites. In reconstructed networks of mature neurons, PrP^Sc-induced ROCK overactivation provoked synapse disconnection and dendrite/axon degeneration. This overactivation of ROCK also disturbed overall neurotransmitter-associated functions. Importantly, we demonstrated that beyond its impact on neuronal polarity ROCK overactivity favored the production of PrP^Sc through a ROCK-dependent control of 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDK1) activity. In non-infectious conditions, ROCK and PDK1 associated within a complex and ROCK phosphorylated PDK1, conferring basal activity to PDK1. In prion-infected neurons, exacerbated ROCK activity increased the pool of PDK1 molecules physically interacting with and phosphorylated by ROCK. ROCK-induced PDK1 overstimulation then canceled the neuroprotective α-cleavage of normal cellular prion protein PrP^C by TACE α-secretase, which physiologically precludes PrP^Sc production. In prion-infected cells, inhibition of ROCK rescued neurite sprouting, preserved neuronal architecture, restored neuronal functions and reduced the amount of PrP^Sc. In mice challenged with prions, inhibition of ROCK also lowered brain PrP^Sc accumulation, reduced motor impairment and extended survival. We conclude that ROCK overactivation exerts a double detrimental effect in prion diseases by altering neuronal polarity and triggering PrP^Sc accumulation. Eventually ROCK emerges as therapeutic target to combat prion diseases.     

Elements of the olfactory signaling pathways in insect antennae

Owing to their enormous ability to recognize airborne molecules, insects have long been used as model systems for studying various aspects of olfaction. Modern biological techniques have opened new avenues for exploring the molecular mechanisms underlying the complex signaling processes in chemosensory neurons. Biochemical and molecular analyses have allowed the identification of molecular elements of the olfactory reaction pathways and have shed light on mechanisms that account for the sensitivity and specificity of the chemosensory system.     

The role of the cytoskeleton during neuronal polarization

The formation of an axon and dendrites, neuronal polarization, is a prerequisite for neurons to integrate and propagate information within the brain. During the past years progress has been made toward understanding the initial stage of neuronal polarization, axon formation. First, the physiological role of some candidate regulators of neuronal polarity has been affirmed, including Sad kinases, the Rho-GTPase Cdc42, and the actin regulators Ena/VASP proteins. Second, recent studies have revealed microtubule stabilization as a mechanism complementary to actin dynamics underlying neuronal polarization. Moreover, stable microtubules in the axon may form a landmark to confer identity to the axon. This review highlights the recent advances in understanding the intracellular mechanisms underlying neuronal polarization and discusses them in the context of putative cytoskeletal effectors.