Heat-shock DNA homology in distantly related species of Drosophila

Polytene chromosomes of D. melanogaster and D. virilis were hybridized in situ with ¹²⁵I labeled mRNA isolated from polysomes of D. melanogaster tissue culture cells incubated at 37° C. ¹²⁵I mRNA hybridized preferentially with subdivisions 87A and 87Cl of the D. melanogaster 3R chromosome; grains were also observed at regions 93D, 95D and over the chromocenter. A considerable cross hybridization of this mRNA with D. virilis polytene chromosomes was observed. The 29C region of the D. virilis second chromosome was the main site of hybridization. Significant grain numbers also appeared in region 20F of the same chromosome. The two regions mentioned belong to heat shock loci in the latter species. Based on label intensity we conclude that region 29C of D. virilis contains DNA sequences retaining molecular homology with those at subdivisions 87A and 87Cl of D. melanogaster. SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed similar distributions of heat shock proteins in the two species studied.     

Molecular and cytogenic analysis of pericentromeric heterochromatin in ovarian nurse cells of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> subgroup species

Evolutionary rearrangements of pericentromeric heterochromatin among Drosophila melanogaster subgroup species have been investigated. A region-specific DNA library from Drosophila orena ovarian nurse cell chromocenter was obtained by the microdissection of polythene chromosomes. The probe has been localized on chromosomes of ovarian nurse cells of Drosophila melanogaster subgroup species using fluorescent hybridization in situ. Sequences homologous to the sequences of the DNA probe were detected in the chromocenter and pericentromeric regions of D. orena polythene chromosomes, in all pericentromeric regions of other species with several exceptions. There was no labeling on one of the arms of the D. simulans chromosome 2; however, these sequences were present on the telomere of D. erecta chromosome 3 and in regions adjacent to the brightly DAPI-stained heterochromatin blocks of D. yakuba, D. santomea and D. teissieri chromosomes 2 and 3. At the S₆ stage (secondary reticulate nucleus), labeled chromatin can be found mostly within a restricted territory in D. orena nucleus; no such chromatin can be detected throughout the rest of the nucleus. On the contrary, at this stage, in nuclei of other species, labeled DNA is spread diffusely.     

Study of the organization of polytene chromosomes in the nuclei of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila melanogaster</Emphasis> pseudonurse cells with the use of the DNA library of the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila orena</Emphasis> chromocenter

The location of the Drosophila orena chromocenter in polytene chromosomes of pseudonurse cells of the D. melanogaster ovaries (the otu11 mutation) and salivary glands has been studied. Numerous sites of location of the D. orena chromocenter DNA have been found throughout the length of D. melanogaster chromosomes. The specific distribution of the binding sites for the DNA probe has made it possible to identify chromosomes and analyze their mutual positions in the three-dimensional space of the nuclei of pseudonurse cells. The mutual positions of chromosomes have been found to vary, the pericentromeric regions of different chromosomes differing from one another in associative ratios.     

Study of the organization of polytene chromosomes in the nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster pseudonurse cells with the use of the DNA library of the Drosophila orena chromocenter

The location of the Drosophila orena chromocenter in polytene chromosomes of pseudonurse cells of the D. melanogaster ovaries (the otu11 mutation) and salivary glands has been studied. Numerous sites of location of the D. orena chromocenter DNA have been found throughout the length of D. melanogaster chromosomes. The specific distribution of the binding sites for the DNA probe has made it possible to identify chromosomes and analyze their mutual positions in the three-dimensional space of the nuclei of pseudonurse cells. The mutual positions of chromosomes have been found to vary, the pericentromeric regions of different chromosomes differing from one another in associative ratios.     

Tissue-Specific Differences in the Spatial Interposition of X-Chromosome and 3R Chromosome Regions in the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles messeae Fall.

Spatial organization of a chromosome in a nucleus is very important in biology but many aspects of it are still generally unresolved. We focused on tissue-specific features of chromosome architecture in closely related malaria mosquitoes, which have essential inter-specific differences in polytene chromosome attachments in nurse cells. We showed that the region responsible for X-chromosome attachment interacts with nuclear lamina stronger in nurse cells, then in salivary glands cells in Anopheles messeae Fall. The inter-tissue differences were demonstrated more convincingly in an experiment of two distinct chromosomes interposition in the nucleus space of cells from four tissues. Microdissected DNA-probes from nurse cells X-chromosome (2BC) and 3R chromosomes (32D) attachment regions were hybridized with intact nuclei of nurse cells, salivary gland cells, follicle epithelium cells and imaginal disсs cells in 3D-FISH experiments. We showed that only salivary gland cells and follicle epithelium cells have no statistical differences in the interposition of 2BC and 32D. Generally, the X-chromosome and 3R chromosome are located closer to each other in cells of the somatic system in comparison with nurse cells on average. The imaginal disсs cell nuclei have an intermediate arrangement of chromosome interposition, similar to other somatic cells and nurse cells. In spite of species-specific chromosome attachments there are no differences in interposition of nurse cells chromosomes in An. messeae and An. atroparvus Thiel. Nurse cells have an unusual chromosome arrangement without a chromocenter, which could be due to the special mission of generative system cells in ontogenesis and evolution.     

Underreplication of satellite DNAs in polyploid ovarian tissue of Drosophila virilis

The satellite DNAs of Drosophila virilis have been examined in diploid and polyploid tissues by isopycnic ultracentrifugation and thermal denaturation experiments. Previous work has established that the satellite DNAs are under replicated in the polytene chromosomes of the salivary glands of D. virilis. The results of the present experiments demonstrate that this underreplication also takes place in the ovaries which contain nurse cells and follicle cells. These tissues are polyploid but do not show polytene chromosomes.     

Localization of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Dras1</Emphasis> gene in polytene chromosomes of sibling species of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila virilis</Emphasis> group

The Dras1 gene was mapped by in situ hybridization to polytene chromosomes of several sibling species of the Drosophila virilis group and their hybrids. A 1037-bp fragment of Dras1 gene from the D. virilis genome was used as the probe. The gene sequence was localized in the region of a 25 A-B disk in chromosome 2 (in accordance with the D. virilis polytene chromosome map (Gubenko and Evgen’ev, 1984).     

The pattern of polytene chromosome synapsis in Drosophila species and interspecific hybrids

The pairing of polytene chromosomes was investigated in Drosophila melanogaster, Drosophila simulans and their hybrids as well as in species of the D. virilis group and in F₁ hybrids between the species of this group. The study of frequency and extent of asynapsis revealed non-random distribution along chromosome arms both in interspecific hybrids and pure Drosophila species. It is suggested that definite chromosome regions exhibiting high pairing frequency serve as initiation sites of synapsis in salivary gland chromosomes.     

Study on the somatic pairing of polytene chromosomes

Plasmids containing Drosophila virilis DNA (pDv118, pDv719, pDv714 and pDv117), characterized and localized on D. virilis chromosomes in Riede et al. (1983) were localized by in situ hybridization with polytene chromosomes of the hybrids D. virilis × D. lummei, D. virilis × D. novamexicana, and D. virilis × D. lacicola. The degree of somatic pairing was determined by comparing the four plasmids in the three hybrids. We found that somatic pairing in the polytene chromosomes decreased with decreasing DNA homology of the bands. — Additional cytological studies indicated that (1) each band can pair independently of its neighboring bands, (2) visible structural differences between bands have no influence on pairing of the surrounding chromosome region, (3) heteromorphic bands can pair by themselves, and (4) inversions of chromosome regions disturb the somatic pairing process but are not the primary cause for nonpairing in hybrids.     

Cohesin Complexes in Polytene Chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster Are Located in Interbands

The distribution of cohesin complex in polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster was studied. Cohesin is a complicated protein complex which is regulated by the DRAD21 subunit. Using immunostaining for DRAD21p, the cohesins were shown to be preferentially located in the interband regions. This specificity was not characteristic for puffs, where uniform staining was observed. The presence of a few brightly fluorescent regions (five to ten per chromosome arm) enriched with cohesin complexes was shown. Some of these regions had permanent location, and the others, variable location. No antibody binding was detected in the chromocenter. Immunostaining of interphase nuclei of neuroblasts revealed large cohesin formations. On the polytene chromosomes of D. melanogaster, the Drad21 gene was mapped to the chromocentric region (81) of the L arm of chromosome 3.     

Repetitive DNA sequences in Drosophila

The satellite DNAs of Drosophila melanogaster and D. virilis have been examined by isopycnic centrifugation, thermal denaturation, and in situ molecular hybridization. The satellites melt over a narrow temperature range, reassociate rapidly after denaturation, and separate into strands of differing buoyant density in alkaline CsCl. In D. virilis and D. melanogaster the satellites constitute respectively 41% and 8% of the DNA isolated from diploid tissue. The satellites make up only a minute fraction of the DNA isolated from polytene tissue. Complementary RNA synthesized in vitro from the largest satellite of D. virilis hybridized to the centromeric heterochromatin of mitotic chromosomes, although binding to the Y chromosome was low. The same cRNA hybridized primarily to the -heterochromatin in the chromocenter of salivary gland nuclei. The level of hybridization in diploid and polytene nuclei was similar, despite the great difference in total DNA content. The centrifugation and hybridization data imply that the -heterochromatin either does not replicate or replicates only slightly during polytenization. Similar but less extensive data are presented for D. melanogaster. — In D. melanogaster cRNA synthesized from total DNA hybridized to the entire chromocenter (- and -heterochromatin) and less intensely to many bands on the chromosome arms. The X chromosome was more heavily labeled than the autosomes. In D. virilis the X chromosome showed a similar preferential binding of cRNA copied from main peak sequences.—It is concluded that the majority of repetitive sequences in D. virilis and D. melanogaster are located in the - and -heterochromatin. Repetitive sequences constitute only a small percentage of the euchromatin, but they are widely distributed in the chromosomes. During polytenization the -heterochromatin probably does not replicate, but some or all of the repetitive sequences in the -heterochromatin and the euchromatin do replicate.     

The pattern of polytene chromosome conjugation and crossing-over in interspecific hybrids of Drosophila

Summary The pairing of polytene chromosomes was investigated in the hybrids between three closely related species of Drosophila belonging to the virilis species group. It was found that within the same hybrid different chromosome bands lost the ability to pair by differing degrees. Furthermore, the same chromosome sections paired with different frequencies depending on the hybrid involved. This study revealed that poor polytene chromosome pairing in the hybrids is not due to specific genetic interaction in the hybrids, but depends solely on the properties of the homologous loci themselves. It was also of interest to find whether the pattern of polytene chromosome somatic pairing resembled in some way the picture of chromosome synapsis during meiosis. To obtain evidence for this, crossing-over in the hybrid 5th chromosome was analyzed both genetically and cytologically (from salivary gland chromosome observations). It was found that the sections of the fifth chromosome which were characterized by a high frequency of conjugation in the salivary glands of hybrids also exhibited a high frequency of crossing-over in hybrid females. It may be concluded that sections of the polytene chromosome characterized by a low frequency of conjugation behave in the same manner in meiosis, and thus rarely take part in genetic recombination.     

The Drosophila Salivary Gland Chromocenter Contains Highly Polytenized Subdomains of Mitotic Heterochromatin

Peri-centromeric regions of Drosophila melanogaster chromosomes appear heterochromatic in mitotic cells and become greatly underrepresented in giant polytene chromosomes, where they aggregate into a central mass called the chromocenter. We used P elements inserted at sites dispersed throughout much of the mitotic heterochromatin to analyze the fate of 31 individual sites during polytenization. Analysis of DNA sequences flanking many of these elements revealed that middle repetitive or unique sequence DNAs frequently are interspersed with satellite DNAs in mitotic heterochromatin. All nine Y chromosome sites tested were underrepresented >20-fold on Southern blots of polytene DNA and were rarely or never detected by in situ hybridization to salivary gland chromosomes. In contrast, nine tested insertions in autosomal centromeric heterochromatin were represented fully in salivary gland DNA, despite the fact that at least six were located proximal to known blocks of satellite DNA. The inserted sequences formed diverse, site-specific morphologies in the chromocenter of salivary gland chromosomes, suggesting that domains dispersed at multiple sites in the centromeric heterochromatin of mitotic chromosomes contribute to polytene β-heterochromatin. We suggest that regions containing heterochromatic genes are organized into dispersed chromatin configurations that are important for their function in vivo.     

Studies of He-T DNA sequences in the pericentric regions of Drosophila chromosomes

He-T DNA is a complex set of repeated DNA sequences with sharply defined locations in the polytene chromosomes of Drosophila melanogaster. He-T sequences are found only in the chromocenter and in the terminal (telomere) band on each chromosome arm. Both of these regions appear to be heterochromatic and He-T sequences are never detected in the euchromatic arms of the chromosomes (Young et al. 1983). In the study reported here, in situ hybridization to metaphase chromosomes was used to study the association of He-T DNA with heterochromatic regions that are under-replicated in polytene chromosomes. Although the metaphase Y chromosome appears to be uniformly heterochromatic, He-T DNA hybridization is concentrated in the pericentric region of both normal and deleted Y chromosomes. He-T DNA hybridization is also concentrated in the pericentric regions of the autosomes. Much lower levels of He-T sequences were found in pericentric regions of normal X chromosomes; however compound X chromosomes, constructed by exchanges involving Y chromosomes, had large amounts of He-T DNA, presumably residual Y sequences. The apparent co-localization of He-T sequences with satellite DNAs in pericentric heterochromatin of metaphase chromosomes contrasts with the segregation of satellite DNA to alpha heterochromatin while He-T sequences hybridize to beta heterochromatin in polytene nuclei. This comparison suggests that satellite sequences do not exist as a single block within each chromosome but have interspersed regions of other sequences, including He-T DNA. If this is so, we assume that the satellite DNA blocks must associate during polytenization, leaving the interspersed sequences looped out to form beta heterochromatin. DNA from D. melanogaster has many restriction fragments with homology to He-T sequences. Some of these fragments are found only on the Y. Two of the repeated He-T family restriction fragments are found entirely on the short arm of the Y, predominantly in the pericentric region. Under conditions of moderate stringency, a subset of He-T DNA sequences cross-hybridizes with DNA from D. simulans and D. miranda. In each species, a large fraction of the cross-hybridizing sequences is on the Y chromosome.     

Analysis of DNAs from two species of the virilis group of Drosophila and implications for satellite DNA evolution

The DNAs from two virilis group species of Drosophila, D. lummei and D. kanekoi, have been analyzed. D. lummei DNA has a major satellite which, on the basis of CsCl equilibrium centrifugation, thermal denaturation, renaturation and in situ hybridization is identical to D. virilis satellite I. D. kanekoi DNA has a major satellite at the same buoyant density in neutral CsCl gradients as satellite III of D. virilis. However, on the basis of alkaline CsCl gradients, the satellite contains a major and a minor component, neither one of which is identical to D. virilis satellite III. By in situ hybridization experiments, sequences complementary to the major component of the D. kanekoi satellite are detected in only some species and in a way not consistent with the phylogeny of the group. However, by filter hybridization experiments using nick-translated D. kanekoi satellite as well as D. lummei satellite I and D. virilis satellite III DNAs as probes, homologous sequences are detected in the DNAs of all virilis group species. Surprisingly, sequences homologous to these satellite DNAs are detected in DNAs from non-virilis group Drosophila species as well as from yeast, sea urchin, Xenopus and mouse.     

In vivo analysis of a fluorescent SUMO fusion in transgenic Drosophila

Sumoylation, the covalent attachment of SUMO, a 90 amino acid peptide related to ubiquitin, is a major modulator of protein functions. Fluorescent SUMO protein fusions have been used in cell cultures to visualize SUMO in vivo but not in multicellular organisms. We generated a transgenic line of Drosophila expressing an mCherry-SUMO fusion. We analyzed its pattern in vivo in salivary gland nuclei expressing Venus-HP1 to recognize the different chromatin components (Chromocenter, chromosome IV). We compared it to SUMO immunostaining on squashed polytene chromosomes and observed similar patterns. In addition to the previously reported SUMO localizations (chromosome arms and chromocenter), we identify 2 intense binding sites: the fourth chromosome telomere and the DAPI-bright band in the region 81F.     

Localization of chromosomal DNA sequences homologous to ribosomal gene type I insertion DNA in Drosophila melanogaster

Summary Chromosomal sites which have DNA homology to the 1 kb (kilobase pair) BamHI restrictable fragment of the 5 kb type I insertion present in many ribosomal genes in Drosophila melanogaster, were identified by using in situ hybridization and autoradiography. XX and XY complements of polytene chromosomes showed the nucleolus and chromocenter to be heavily labeled. Of the light label over euchromatic regions, the 102C band of chromosome 4 labeled particularly intensely. In mitotic XX and XY complements, the NORs (nucleolus organizer regions) of both sex chromosomes labeled as did the centromeric heterochromatin of autosomes. Label also appeared less frequently over telomeric and euchromatic regions.     

Puzzling Chromosome Behavior in Triploid Females of Drosophila melanogaster

Based on a particular formation of the chromocenter and trivalents in triploid Drosophila females, as well as on asynapsis in pericentromeric regions (which is a result of trivalent competition), an explanation for the increased frequency of crossing over and nonrandom segregation of the X chromosomes and autosomes in the first meiotic division is suggested. It is proposed that a delay in pairing of the pericentromeric heterochromatic chromosome regions combined into a single chromocenter leads to the following: (1) formation of the heteroduplex structures (X structures) takes more time and, consequently, their number and the frequency of crossing over in the paired chromosome regions increases; (2) in nonhomologous chromosomes, the chromocentral connections, which normally degrade in prometaphase, are retained to fulfill a function of coorientation during the first meiotic division.     

Human (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) share similar ancestral centromeric alpha satellite DNA sequences but other fractions of heterochromatin differ considerably

The euchromatic regions of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) genome share approximately 98% sequence similarity with the human (Homo sapiens), while the heterochromatic regions display considerable divergence. Positive heterochromatic regions revealed by the CBG-technique are confined to pericentromeric areas in humans, while in chimpanzees, these regions are pericentromeric, telomeric, and intercalary. When human chromosomes are digested with restriction endonuclease AluI and stained by Giemsa (AluI/Giemsa), positive heterochromatin is detected only in the pericentromeric regions, while in chimpanzee, telomeric, pericentromeric, and in some chromosomes both telomeric and centromeric, regions are positive. The DA/DAPI technique further revealed extensive cytochemical heterogeneity of heterochromatin in both species. Nevertheless, the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique (FISH) using a centromeric alpha satellite cocktail probe revealed that both primates share similar pericentromeric alpha satellite DNA sequences. Furthermore, cross-hybridization experiments using chromosomes of gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) suggest that the alphoid repeats of human and great apes are highly conserved, implying that these repeat families were present in their common ancestor. Nevertheless, the orangutan's chromosome 9 did not cross-hybridize with human probe. The euchromatic regions of chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) genome share approximately 98% sequence similarity with the human (Homo sapiens), while the heterochromatic regions display considerable divergence. Positive heterochromatic regions revealed by the CBG-technique are confined to pericentromeric areas in humans, while in chimpanzees, these regions are pericentromeric, telomeric, and intercalary. When human chromosomes are digested with restriction endonuclease AluI and stained by Giemsa (AluI/Giemsa), positive heterochromatin is detected only in the pericentromeric regions, while in chimpanzee, telomeric, pericentromeric, and in some chromosomes both telomeric and centromeric, regions are positive. The DA/DAPI technique further revealed extensive cytochemical heterogeneity of heterochromatin in both species. Nevertheless, the fluorescence in situ hybridization technique (FISH) using a centromeric alpha satellite cocktail probe revealed that both primates share similar pericentromeric alpha satellite DNA sequences. Furthermore, cross-hybridization experiments using chromosomes of gorilla (Gorilla gorilla) and orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus) suggest that the alphoid repeats of human and great apes are highly conserved, implying that these repeat families were present in their common ancestor. Nevertheless, the orangutan's chromosome 9 did not cross-hybridize with human probe. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Bivalent individualization during chromosome territory formation in Drosophila spermatocytes by controlled condensin II protein activity and additional force generators

Reduction of genome ploidy from diploid to haploid necessitates stable pairing of homologous chromosomes into bivalents before the start of the first meiotic division. Importantly, this chromosome pairing must avoid interlocking of non-homologous chromosomes. In spermatocytes of Drosophila melanogaster, where homolog pairing does not involve synaptonemal complex formation and crossovers, associations between non-homologous chromosomes are broken up by chromosome territory formation in early spermatocytes. Extensive non-homologous associations arise from the coalescence of the large blocks of pericentromeric heterochromatin into a chromocenter and from centromere clustering. Nevertheless, during territory formation, bivalents are moved apart into spatially separate subnuclear regions. The condensin II subunits, Cap-D3 and Cap-H2, have been implicated, but the remarkable separation of bivalents during interphase might require more than just condensin II. For further characterization of this process, we have applied time-lapse imaging using fluorescent markers of centromeres, telomeres and DNA satellites in pericentromeric heterochromatin. We describe the dynamics of the disruption of centromere clusters and the chromocenter in normal spermatocytes. Mutations in Cap-D3 and Cap-H2 abolish chromocenter disruption, resulting in excessive chromosome missegregation during M I. Chromocenter persistence in the mutants is not mediated by the special system, which conjoins homologs in compensation for the absence of crossovers in Drosophila spermatocytes. However, overexpression of Cap-H2 precluded conjunction between autosomal homologs, resulting in random segregation of univalents. Interestingly, Cap-D3 and Cap-H2 mutant spermatocytes displayed conspicuous stretching of the chromocenter, as well as occasional chromocenter disruption, suggesting that territory formation might involve forces unrelated to condensin II. While the molecular basis of these forces remains to be clarified, they are not destroyed by inhibitors of F actin and microtubules. Our results indicate that condensin II activity promotes chromosome territory formation in co-operation with additional force generators and that careful co-ordination with alternative homolog conjunction is crucial.