九个春化作用特性不同的小麦品种中VRN1基因的组成和特性分析

采用序列特异性PCR扩增技术,分析9个春化特性不同品种小麦春化基因VRN1在A、B和D基因组中等位基因的显隐性组成特性的结果表明:小麦品种'辽春15'中春化基因VRN1的A、B和D等位基因均为显性;小麦品种'新春2号'只在A基因组中为显性;小麦品种'豫麦18'的D基因组中为显性;'郑麦9023'和'新冬18'两个品种的B基因组中为显性;'周麦18'、'豫麦49-198'、'京841'和'肥麦'4个品种的A、B和D等位基因均为隐性.     

黄淮南片冬麦区主导品种春化基因及冬春性分析

以1950～2007年黄淮南片冬麦区的127个主导小麦品种为材料,利用第5同源群的春化基因分子标记对其进行了春化基因检测,并分析了小麦品种的春化基因与其冬春性的对应关系及黄淮南片冬麦区8次品种更换中春化基因与品种冬春性的演变规律.结果表明,参试品种中没有品种携带显性Vrn-A1基因,7个品种含有Vrn-B1基因(5.5%),2个品种含有Vrn-B1+Vrn-D1基因(1.6%),56个品种含有Vrn-D1基因(44.1%).春化基因类型与品种冬春特性基本相符,春化基因控制着小麦品种的冬春特性.主导品种含春化显性基因频率的变化趋势与冬春性变化规律存在较大差异,与传统方法相比,仅用春化基因来确定品种冬春性存在一定的不完善之处.采用春化基因分子标记与传统的冬春性鉴定方法相结合来认识品种冬春性、预测品种的抗寒性对黄淮南片冬麦区的小麦品种利用更具有指导意义.     

4个春性基因型小麦品种与‘京841’杂交F_1代的表型分析

选用4个具有不同显性春化基因型的小麦品种与冬性小麦品种‘京841’进行杂交实验,通过显性春化基因特异性PCR分析技术鉴定杂交F1代植株,并分析4个杂交组合的正反交F1代植株表型特性。结果显示,各显性春化基因已经导入到各杂交F1代植株中,且其苗穗期受显性春化基因的控制而有效缩短;3个杂交组合的F1代穗粒数在正反交之间存在显著差异,推测穗粒数受细胞质遗传因素的影响较大,其中以‘新春2号’和‘豫麦18’分别为母本和父本与‘京841’杂交后F1代的穗粒数表现出较强的杂种优势,4个杂交组合的F1代千粒重均表现出较强的杂种优势。     

河南小麦新品种的春化基因型鉴定

为了了解河南省最新培育小麦品种春化基因的等位变异状况,本研究利用分子标记技术对河南省新培育的50份冬小麦新品系(种)的春化基因Vrn-A1、Vrn-B1、Vrn-D1和Vrn-B3位点的等位变异组成进行了鉴定和分析。结果表明,所有参试小麦品种的Vrn-B3位点基因型均表现为隐性,48份小麦品种的Vrn-A1和Vrn-B1位点基因为隐性,42份小麦品种的Vrn-D1位点基因为隐性,说明隐性基因在河南小麦中占据主导地位。其中,豫农2019、豫农2020、豫农2071、国麦301、平安08-8、百农69、囤麦3698、08漯33共8个小麦品种的Vrn-D1位点基因均为显性的Vrn-D1a类型。小麦品系豫农2053和豫农3052的Vrn-A1和Vrn-B1位点的春化基因均表现为缺失,进一步研究表明,这2份小麦新品系仍能正常开花,但开花期比对照周麦18分别晚1d和2d,因此Vrn-A1和Vrn-B1并非小麦开花的必需基因。本研究将为黄淮麦区广适、高产小麦新品种的选育和推广提供参考。     

小麦冬性强弱评价体系的建立

建立一个比较准确的小麦冬性评价体系,对小麦种质研究评价、引种及应对自然灾害都具有重要应用价值,对小麦生态型的解释具有一定的理论意义。以12个冬性强弱不同的小麦品种为材料,经过两年重复试验,在自然春化与人工春化条件下,对与春化有关的成穗数等4个形态指标进行调查,对人工春化条件下5月份播种的小麦生长锥进行观察。经过对成穗数进行聚类分析,将12个冬小麦品种划分为弱冬性、冬性、强冬性3类。另外,结合不同春化条件下小麦成穗数差异的显著性分析结果及相关指标的标准化数据进行分析,结果表明:(1)根据幼苗习性对小麦冬性进行划分的方式存在一定缺陷,划分结果存在误差。自然春化条件下进行冬性划分具有一定的合理性,但由于受到多种外界因素影响,对相邻类型的划分效果不理想。(2)茎蘖数、小穗数、千粒重等指标存在一定的交叉现象,不适于进行冬性评价。人工春化处理下,小麦的成穗数与生长锥形态可以准确评价小麦冬性的强弱。     

黑龙江小麦春化和光周期主要基因组成分析

选取黑龙江省小麦品种126份,对其春化和光周期基因型及农艺性状进行研究。结果表明,春化和光周期基因位点显性等位变异组合在黑龙江省小麦中分布频率明显不同。含有显性基因组合Vrn-A1/Vrn-D1的分布频率最高,为26.2%,其次是显性基因Vrn-A1/Vrn-B1和Vrn-A1/Vrn-B1/Vrn-D1,分布频率分别为23.8%和23.0%,最低的是Vrn-B1基因,分布频率为0.8%,Vrn-B3位点在黑龙江小麦中不存在显性等位变异。光周期基因Ppd-D1位点的检测结果表明,53个小麦品种携带有Ppd-D1a基因型,表明光钝型小麦占42%,73个品种携带Ppd-D1b基因型,表明光敏型小麦占58%。结合田间性状调查分析春化和光周期基因对农艺性状的影响,发现在黑龙江省小麦品种中,光周期基因型对小麦的抽穗期有影响,Ppd-D1a的抽穗期比Ppd-D1b的抽穗期提前1~5d;春化和光周期基因等位变异组合对苗期习性有影响。     

小麦春化发育的分子调控机理研究进展

春化发育特性是小麦品种的重要性状,直接影响着小麦品种的种植范围和利用效率.本文就小麦春化相关基因的发现,以及对春化相关基因VRN1、VRN2和VRN3的克隆、表达特性以及春化发育分子调控机理方面的研究进展进行了综述.     

小麦不同品种和播期对发育阶段的效应

以热时间（thermal time)为尺度研究了小麦不同品种和播期对发育阶段的效应,结果表明,小麦分蘖发生的早晚以生态因子调控为主,基因型差异较小;分薛- 节期为冬性品种（京411）一生中可变性最大的生育阶段,穗分化进入单棱斯的早晚以基因型效应为主,生态因子的影响次之,单棱－二棱期为春化作用的敏感期,冬性品种晚播（3月2日）春化效应可延迟到小花原基分化期之前,小麦物候期与穗发育阶段的对应关系具有一定的可变性,冬性品种较强的春化作用增加了其生态可变叶原基数;春化过程结束前,物候发育及穗发育阶段累计GDD与相应生殖器官原基分化的数的相关性不明显,春性品种（扬麦158）的物候发育及药隔分化期之前的穗发育阶段与各类顶端原基的分化数均具有极显著的正相关关系。     

三个小麦春化基因的时空表达特性分析(英文)

为明确小麦春化基因的时空表达特性,以中国春和洛旱2号小麦品种为试验材料,利用半定量RT-PCR技术,分析了3个春化基因VERNALIZATION1(VRN1)、VRN2和VRN3的时空表达特性。结果表明,VRN1在中国春的三叶期叶片和根、灌浆期的茎秆和旗叶、花药、胚珠和发育的种子中均有不同程度的表达。在开花前,表达水平呈上升趋势,而花后呈降低的趋势,在干种子和萌发种子的胚芽中没有检测到表达;在洛旱2号中,除了在三叶期的叶片和根中没有检测到表达外,VRN1的表达特性与中国春有相同的趋势。VRN2只在三叶期的叶片和萌发种子的胚芽中表达,在其他检测的组织中没有表达;VRN3的表达与VRN1的时空表达特性相似,但在根中未检测到表达。这一结果为进一步分析普通小麦品种春化发育的分子调控机理提供了重要信息。     

冬小麦幼苗春化期间过氧化物酶的变化

研究了冬小麦幼苗在春化过程中过氧化物酶同工酶谱、过氧化物酶活性和可溶性蛋白质含量的变化。在冬小麦春化过程的中期,过氧化物酶同工酶谱存在着较显著的变化,第二条主要谱带逐渐减弱和接近消失,靠近正极的第四条主要酶带有所加强。而舂小麦正相反,第四条及第五条酶带都因春化处理而减弱。同时观察到春化21天以后冬小麦幼苗可溶性蛋白质含量迅速增加。     

Allelic variation at the <Emphasis Type="Italic">VRN-1</Emphasis> promoter region in polyploid wheat

Vernalization, the requirement of a long exposure to low temperatures to induce flowering, is an essential adaptation of plants to cold winters. We have shown recently that the vernalization gene VRN-1 from diploid wheat Triticum monococcum is the meristem identity gene APETALA1, and that deletions in its promoter were associated with spring growth habit. In this study, we characterized the allelic variation at the VRN-1 promoter region in polyploid wheat. The Vrn-A1a allele has a duplication including the promoter region. Each copy has similar foldback elements inserted at the same location and is flanked by identical host direct duplications (HDD). This allele was found in more than half of the hexaploid varieties but not among the tetraploid lines analyzed here. The Vrn-A1b allele has two mutations in the HDD region and a 20-bp deletion in the 5 UTR compared with the winter allele. The Vrn-A1b allele was found in both tetraploid and hexaploid accessions but at a relatively low frequency. Among the tetraploid wheat accessions, we found two additional alleles with 32 bp and 54 bp deletions that included the HDD region. We found no size polymorphisms in the promoter region among the winter wheat varieties. The dominant Vrn-A1 allele from two spring varieties from Afghanistan and Egypt (Vrn-A1c allele) and all the dominant Vrn-B1 and Vrn-D1 alleles included in this study showed no differences from their respective recessive alleles in promoter sequences. Based on these results, we concluded that the VRN-1 genes should have additional regulatory sites outside the promoter region studied here.     

Cold hardiness of wheat near-isogenic lines differing in vernalization alleles

Four major genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), with the dominant alleles designated Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, Vrn-D1, and Vrn4, are known to have large effects on the vernalization response, but the effects on cold hardiness are ambiguous. Near-isogenic experimental lines (NILs) in a Triple Dirk (TD) genetic background with different vernalization alleles were evaluated for cold hardiness. Although TD is homozygous dominant for Vrn-A1 (formerly Vrn1) and Vrn-B1 (formerly Vrn2), four of the lines are each homozygous dominant for a different vernalization gene, and one line is homozygous recessive for all four vernalization genes. Following establishment, the plants were initially acclimated for 6 weeks in a growth chamber and then stressed in a low temperature freezer from which they were removed over a range of temperatures as the chamber temperature was lowered 1.3°C h^–1. Temperatures resulting in no regrowth from 50% of the plants (LT₅₀) were determined by estimating the inflection point of the sigmoidal response curve by nonlinear regression. The LT₅₀ values were –6.7°C for cv. TD, –6.6°C for the Vrn-A1 and Vrn4 lines, –8.1°C for the Vrn-D1 (formerly Vrn3) line, –9.4°C for the Vrn-B1 line, and –11.7°C for the homozygous recessive winter line. The LT₅₀ of the true winter line was significantly lower than those of all the other lines. Significant differences were also observed between some, but not all, of the lines possessing dominant vernalization alleles. The presence of dominant vernalization alleles at one of the four loci studied significantly reduced cold hardiness following acclimation.     

Large deletions within the first intron in <Emphasis Type="Italic">VRN-1</Emphasis> are associated with spring growth habit in barley and wheat

The broad adaptability of wheat and barley is in part attributable to their flexible growth habit, in that spring forms have recurrently evolved from the ancestral winter growth habit. In diploid wheat and barley growth habit is determined by allelic variation at the VRN-1 and/or VRN-2 loci, whereas in the polyploid wheat species it is determined primarily by allelic variation at VRN-1. Dominant Vrn-A1 alleles for spring growth habit are frequently associated with mutations in the promoter region in diploid wheat and in the A genome of common wheat. However, several dominant Vrn-A1, Vrn-B1, Vrn-D1 (common wheat) and Vrn-H1 (barley) alleles show no polymorphisms in the promoter region relative to their respective recessive alleles. In this study, we sequenced the complete VRN-1 gene from these accessions and found that all of them have large deletions within the first intron, which overlap in a 4-kb region. Furthermore, a 2.8-kb segment within the 4-kb region showed high sequence conservation among the different recessive alleles. PCR markers for these deletions showed that similar deletions were present in all the accessions with known Vrn-B1 and Vrn-D1 alleles, and in 51 hexaploid spring wheat accessions previously shown to have no polymorphisms in the VRN-A1 promoter region. Twenty-four tetraploid wheat accessions had a similar deletion in VRN-A1 intron 1. We hypothesize that the 2.8-kb conserved region includes regulatory elements important for the vernalization requirement. Epistatic interactions between VRN-H2 and the VRN-H1 allele with the intron 1 deletion suggest that the deleted region may include a recognition site for the flowering repression mediated by the product of the VRN-H2 gene of barley.     

The relationship between vernalization-and photoperiodically-regulated genes and the development of frost tolerance in wheat and barley

The review summarizes the level of current knowledge of impacts of vernalization and photoperiod on the induction and maintenance of frost tolerance (FrT) in wheat and barley. The phenomenon of vernalization is briefly described and the major vernalization (VRN) loci are characterised. Vernalization requirement and the three major growth habits of Triticeae (facultative, winter and spring) are defined on the basis of the two-locus VRN-2/VRN-1 epistatic model. Major photoperiodically regulated genes, which influence the transition to flowering, are characterised and their interactions with VRN genes are briefly discussed. The phenomenon of induction of FrT during the process of cold acclimation (CA) is described and the major cold-induced Cor/Lea genes are listed. Important regulatory mechanisms, i.e., CBF pathway, controlling the expression of Cor/Lea genes under cold, are discussed. The major loci affecting the development of FrT in Triticeae, the Fr loci, are characterised. In conclusion, current progress in this research field is summarized and new questions arising in the area are formulated.     

Revealing hereditary variation of winter hardiness in cereals

A set of cereal crops and differentiating cultivars was shown to be of utility for identifying the major abiotic factors that limit the survival of winter crops in the cold season of a particular year. With this approach, the season was identified (1997-1998, Belgorod) when the survival of cereals depended on the tolerance to anaerobiosis rather than on the frost resistance. Differentiation of common wheat cultivars with respect to this property was attributed to a locus designated Win1 (Winter hardiness 1) and localized 3.2-5.8% recombination away from the B1 (awnlessness) gene. Winter barley (cultivar Odesskii 165) displayed the highest tolerance to anaerobiosis in the cold season; low and intermediate tolerance was established for winter durum wheat (cultivar Alyi Parus) and winter common wheat, respectively. Frost resistance and winter hardiness type 1 proved to be determined by different genetic systems, which showed no statistical association. Correlation analysis revealed significant positive associations of frost resistance in the field (1996-1997, Belgorod) with productivity, sedimentation index, plant height, and vegetation period in wheat. Statistical analysis associated frost resistance with gliadin-coding alleles of homeologous chromosomes 1 and 6 of the A, B, and D wheat genomes.     

Discrete developmental roles for temperate cereal grass VERNALIZATION1/FRUITFULL-like genes in flowering competency and the transition to flowering

Members of the grass subfamily Pooideae are characterized by their adaptation to cool temperate climates. Vernalization is the process whereby flowering is accelerated in response to a prolonged period of cold. Winter cereals are tolerant of low temperatures and flower earlier with vernalization, whereas spring cultivars are intolerant of low temperatures and flower later with vernalization. In the pooid grasses wheat (Triticum monococcum, Triticum aestivum) and barley (Hordeum vulgare), vernalization responsiveness is determined by allelic variation at the VERNALIZATION1 (VRN1) and/or VRN2 loci. To determine whether VRN1, and its paralog FRUITFULL2 (FUL2), are involved in vernalization requirement across Pooideae, we determined expression profiles for multiple cultivars of oat (Avena sativa) and wheat with and without cold treatment. Our results demonstrate significant up-regulation of VRN1 expression in leaves of winter oat and wheat in response to vernalization; no treatment effect was found for spring or facultative growth habit oat and wheat. Similar cold-dependent patterns of leaf expression were found for FUL2 in winter oat, but not winter wheat, suggesting a redundant qualitative role for these genes in the quantitative induction of flowering competency of oat. These and other data support the hypothesis that VRN1 is a common regulator of vernalization responsiveness within the crown pooids. Finally, we found that up-regulation of VRN1 in vegetative meristems of oat was significantly later than in leaves. This suggests distinct and conserved roles for temperate cereal grass VRN1/FUL-like genes, first, in systemic signaling to induce flowering competency, and second, in meristems to activate genes involved in the floral transition.