Identification of p2y9/GPR23 as a novel G protein-coupled receptor for lysophosphatidic acid,structurally distant from the Edg family

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lipid mediator with diverse physiological and pathological actions on many types of cells. LPA has been widely considered to elicit its biological functions through three types of G protein-coupled receptors, Edg-2 (endothelial cell differentiation gene-2)/LPA1/vzg-1 (ventricular zone gene-1), Edg-4/LPA2, and Edg-7/LPA3. We identified an orphan G protein-coupled receptor, p2y9/GPR23, as the fourth LPA receptor (LPA4). Membrane fractions of RH7777 cells transiently expressing p2y9/GPR23 displayed a specific binding for 1-oleoyl-LPA with a Kd value of around 45 nm. Competition binding and reporter gene assays showed that p2y9/GPR23 preferred structural analogs of LPA with a rank order of 1-oleoyl- > 1-stearoyl- > 1-palmitoyl- > 1-myristoyl- > 1-alkyl- > 1-alkenyl-LPA. In Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing p2y9/GPR23, 1-oleoyl-LPA induced an increase in intracellular Ca2+ concentration and stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity. Quantitative real-time PCR demonstrated that mRNA of p2y9/GPR23 was significantly abundant in ovary compared with other tissues. Interestingly, p2y9/GPR23 shares only 20-24% amino acid identities with Edg-2/LPA1, Edg-4/LPA2, and Edg-7/LPA3, and phylogenetic analysis also shows that p2y9/GPR23 is far distant from the Edg family. These facts suggest that p2y9/GPR23 has evolved from different ancestor sequences from the Edg family.     

Lysophosphatidic acid inhibits Ca2+ signaling in response to epidermal growth factor receptor stimulation in human astrocytoma cells by a mechanism involving phospholipase C(gamma) and a G(alphai) protein

The effect of the lysophospholipid mediators lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate and the polypeptide growth factor epidermal growth factor (EGF) on the human astrocytoma cell line 1321N1 was assessed. These agonists produced a rapid and transient increase of the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration. When LPA was perfused before addition of EGF, the EGF-dependent Ca(2+) transient was abrogated, whereas this was not observed when EGF preceded LPA addition. This inhibitory effect was not found for other EGF-mediated responses, e.g., activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade and cell proliferation, thus pointing to the existence of cross-talk between LPA and EGF for only a branch of EGF-induced responses. As 1321N1 cells expressed mRNA encoding the LPA receptors endothelial differentiation gene (Edg)-2, Edg-4, and Edg-7 and as sphingosine 1-phosphate did not interfere with LPA signaling, Edg-2, Edg-4, and/or Edg-7 could be considered as the LPA receptors mediating the aforementioned cross-talk. Attempts to address the biochemical mechanism involved in the cross-talk between the receptors were conducted by the immunoprecipitation approach using antibodies reacting with the EGF receptor (EGFR), phosphotyrosine, phospholipase Cgamma (PLCgamma)-1, and G(alphai) protein. LPA was found to induce coupling of PLCgamma-1 to the EGFR by a mechanism involving a G(alphai) protein, in the absence of tyrosine phosphorylation of both PLCgamma and the EGFR. These data show a cross-talk between LPA and EGF limited to a branch of EGFR-mediated signaling, which may be explained by a LPA-induced, G(alphai)-protein-mediated translocation of PLCgamma-1 to EGFR in the absence of detectable tyrosine phosphorylation of both proteins.     

Dual mode regulation of migration by lysophosphatidic acid in human gastric cancer cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), which interacts with at least three G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), LPA1/Edg-2, LPA2/Edg-4, and LPA3/Edg-7, is a lipid mediator with diverse effects on various cells. Here, we investigated the expression profiles of LPA receptors and patterns of LPA-induced migration in gastric cancer cells. Northern blot analysis revealed that various gastric cancer cells expressed variable levels of LPA1, LPA2, and LPA3 without a consistent pattern. Using a Boyden chamber assay, LPA markedly increased cell migration of LPA1-expressing cells, the effects of which were almost totally abrogated by Ki16425, an LPA antagonist against LPA1 and LPA3. In contrast, LPA by itself did not significantly induce migration in MKN28 and MKN74 cells, which exclusively expressed LPA2. However, when hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) was placed with LPA in the lower chamber, LPA induced migration of these cells in a dose-dependent manner. Immunoprecipitation analysis revealed that LPA induced transient tyrosine phosphorylation of c-Met in LPA2-expressing cells, which suggests that the transactivation of c-Met by LPA causes a cooperative migratory response with HGF to these cells. Our results indicate that LPA regulates the migration of gastric cancer cells in a receptor-specific manner and suggest that the expression pattern of LPA receptors may affect the metastatic behavior of gastric cancer.     

Cutting edge: differential constitutive expression of functional receptors for lysophosphatidic acid by human blood lymphocytes

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) from platelets and macrophages mediate T cell functions. Endothelial differentiation gene-encoded G protein-coupled receptors (Edg Rs) are specific for S1P (Edg-1, -3, -5, and -8 Rs) and LPA (Edg-2, -4, and -7 Rs). Human T cell tumors express many Edg Rs for both LPA and S1P. In contrast, human blood CD4+ T cells express predominantly Edg-4, and CD8+ T cells show only traces of Edg-2 and -5, by quantification of mRNA and Edg R Ags. LPA at 10-10-10-6 M suppressed significantly the secretion of IL-2 from anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 Ab-challenged CD4+ T cells, but not CD8+ T cells. Monoclonal anti-Edg-4 R Ab, like LPA, suppressed stimulated IL-2 secretion from CD4+ T cells, but not CD8+ T cells. Constitutive expression of Edg-4 by CD4+, but not CD8+, human T cells accounts for differential functional responsiveness of the T cell subsets to LPA.     

Lysophosphatidic acid receptor-selective effects on Jurkat T cell migration through a Matrigel model basement membrane

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) and sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) from platelets and mononuclear phagocytes mediate T cell functions through endothelial differentiation gene-encoded G protein-coupled receptors (Edg Rs) specific for LPA (Edg-2, -4, and -7) or S1P (Edg-1, -3, -5, -6, and -8). Jurkat leukemic T cells with the SV40 virus large T Ag (Jurkat-T cells) express Edg-3>-2>-4 Rs, as assessed by RT-semiquantitative PCR and Western blots with anti-Edg R mAbs. Jurkat-T cells expressing predominantly Edg-2 R (Jurkat-T-2 cells) and Edg-4 R (Jurkat-T-4 cells) were developed by cotransfection with the respective sense plasmids and a mixture of antisense plasmids for the other Edg Rs, and hygromycin selection. Migration of Jurkat-T-4 cells, but not Jurkat-T-2 cells, through a layer of Matrigel on a 5-um pore polycarbonate filter was stimulated up to 5-fold by 10(-9) to 10(-6) M LPA and by 30-300 ng/ml of anti-Edg-4 R Ab, but not anti-Edg-2 R Ab. LPA and anti-Edg-4 R Ab also enhanced by up to 4-fold the expression of matrix metalloproteinase by Jurkat-T-4 cells, but not Jurkat-T-2 cells, as assessed by cleavage of [(3)H]-type IV human collagen in the Matrigel. Enhancement of matrix metalloproteinase-dependent trans-Matrigel migration of Jurkat-T cells by the chemokine RANTES was suppressed by anti-Edg-2 R Abs, but was stimulated by anti-Edg-4 R Abs. The opposite effects of Edg-2 and Edg-4 LPA receptors on trans-Matrigel migration and some other T cell functions provide receptor-selective mechanisms for regulation of T cell recruitment and immune contributions.     

Lysophosphatidic acid-induced mitogenesis is regulated by lipid phosphate phosphatases and is Edg-receptor independent

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is an extracellular signaling mediator with a broad range of cellular responses. Three G-protein-coupled receptors (Edg-2, -4, and -7) have been identified as receptors for LPA. In this study, the ectophosphatase lipid phosphate phosphatase 1 (LPP1) has been shown to down-regulate LPA-mediated mitogenesis. Furthermore, using degradation-resistant phosphonate analogs of LPA and stereoselective agonists of the Edg receptors we have demonstrated that the mitogenic and platelet aggregation responses to LPA are independent of Edg-2, -4, and -7. Specifically, we found that LPA degradation is insufficient to account for the decrease in LPA potency in mitogenic assays, and the stereoselectivity observed at the Edg receptors is not reflected in mitogenesis. Additionally, RH7777 cells, which are devoid of Edg-2, -4, and -7 receptor mRNA, have a mitogenic response to LPA and LPA analogs. Finally, we have determined that the ligand selectivity of the platelet aggregation response is consistent with that of mitogenesis, but not with Edg-2, -4, and -7.     

Lysophosphatidic acid inhibits bacterial endotoxin-induced pro-inflammatory response: potential anti-inflammatory signaling pathways

Previous studies have demonstrated that heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory (Gi) protein-deficient mice exhibit augmented inflammatory responses to lipopolysaccharide (LPS). These findings suggest that Gi protein agonists will suppress LPS-induced inflammatory gene expression. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) activates G protein-coupled receptors leading to Gi protein activation. We hypothesized that LPA will inhibit LPS-induced inflammatory responses through activation of Gi-coupled anti-inflammatory signaling pathways. We examined the anti-inflammatory effect of LPA on LPS responses both in vivo and in vitro in CD-1 mice. The mice were injected intravenously with LPA (10 mg/kg) followed by intraperitoneal injection of LPS (75 mg/kg for survival and 25 mg/kg for other studies). LPA significantly increased the mice survival to endotoxemia (P < 0.05). LPA injection reduced LPS-induced plasma TNF-alpha production (69 +/- 6%, P < 0.05) and myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity in lung (33 +/- 9%, P < 0.05) as compared to vehicle injection. LPS-induced plasma IL-6 was unchanged by LPA. In vitro studies with peritoneal macrophages paralleled results from in vivo studies. LPA (1 and 10 microM) significantly inhibited LPS-induced TNFalpha production (61 +/- 9% and 72 +/- 9%, respectively, P < 0.05) but not IL-6. We further demonstrated that the anti-inflammatory effect of LPA was reversed by ERK 1/2 and phosphatase inhibitors, suggesting that ERK 1/2 pathway and serine/threonine phosphatases are involved. Inhibition of phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3) kinase signaling pathways also partially reversed the LPA anti-inflammatory response. However, LPA did not alter NFkappaB and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARgamma) activation. Inhibitors of PPARgamma did not alter LPA-induced inhibition of LPS signaling. These studies demonstrate that LPA has significant anti-inflammatory activities involving activation of ERK 1/2, serine/threonine phosphatases, and PI3 kinase signaling pathways.     

Altered expression and functional profile of lysophosphatidic acid receptors in mitogen-activated human blood T lymphocytes.

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) from platelets and mononuclear phagocytes regulates T cell functions through endothelial differentiation gene-encoded G protein-coupled receptors (Edg Rs). Human blood unactivated CD4+ T cells express predominant ly Edg-4 LPA R over marginal levels of Edg-2 LPA R, as assessed by semiquantitative PCR and Western blots. After mitogen activation, the CD4+ T cells express Ed g-2 Rs at approximately one half the level of Edg-4 Rs. Secretion of IL-2 by unactivated Edg-4 R-predominant CD4+ T cells incubated with anti-CD3 plus anti-CD28 antibodies was suppressed significantly and by up to 60% by 10-10 M to 10-6 M LPA, whereas secretion of IL-2 by mitogen-activated Edg-2 R and Edg-4 R codominant CD4+ T cells was enhanced by up to twofold by the same concentrations of LPA. The possibility that the two Edg Rs transduce different LPA signals to CD4+ T cells was supported by findings that IL-2 secretion was inhibited by mouse anti-Edg-4 R monoclonal antibody, but enhanced by mouse anti-Edg-2 R monoclonal antibody. The separate effects of each LPA R were studied in Jurkat T cell transfectants expressing principally human Edg-2 Rs (Jurkat-T-2) or Edg-4 Rs (Jurkat-T-4) and stimulated with anti-CD3 plus phorbol myristate acetate. LPA and anti-Edg-4 R antibody suppressed IL-2 secretion by stimulated Jurkat-T-4 cells, whereas LPA and anti-Edg-2 R antibody enhanced IL-2 secretion by stimulated Jurkat-T-2 cells. Activation-induced alterations in the relative levels of Edg-2 and -4 Rs on CD4+ T cells thus reverse the effects of LPA on T cell receptor-stimulated generation of IL-2.     

Sharpening the edges of understanding the structure/function of the LPA1 receptor: expression in cancer and mechanisms of regulation

Since the molecular cloning of the vzg-1/Edg-2/LPA1 gene, studies have attempted to characterize LPA1 receptor functionality into a single categorical role, different from the other Edg-family LPA receptors. The desire to categorize LPA1 function has highlighted its complexity and demonstrated that the LPA1 receptor does not have one absolute function throughout every system. The central nervous system is highly enriched in the LPA1 receptor, suggesting an integral role in neuronal processes. Metastatic and invasive breast cancer also appears to have LPA-mediated LPA1 receptor functions that enhance phenotypes associated with tumorigenesis. LPA1 possesses a number of motifs conserved among G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs): a DRY-like motif, a PDZ domain, Ser/Thr predicted sites of phosphorylation, a di-leucine motif, double cysteines in the tail and conserved residues that stabilize structure and determine ligand binding. The third intracellular loop of the LPA1 receptor may be the crux of receptor signaling and attenuation with phosphorylation of Thr-236 potentially a key determinant of basal LPA1 signaling. Mutagenesis data supports the notion that Thr-236 regulates this process since mutating Thr-236 to Ala-236 increased basal and LPA-mediated serum response factor (SRF) signaling activity and Lys-236 further increased this basal signaling. Here we describe progress on defining the major functions of the LPA1 receptor, discuss a context dependent dualistic role as both a negative regulator in cancer and a proto-oncogene, outline its structural components at the molecular amino acid level and present mutagenesis data on the third intracellular loop of the receptor.     

Edg-6 as a putative sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor coupling to Ca(2+) signaling pathway

The endothelial differentiation gene-6 (Edg-6) was recently identified as an orphan G-protein-coupled receptor. Its predicted amino acid sequence is very close to Edg family of receptor proteins whose ligand is supposed to be lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) or lysosphingolipid such as sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and sphingosylphosphorylcholine (SPC). Transfection of the Edg-6 into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells and K562 cells resulted in the appearance of high-affinity [(3)H]S1P binding activity. Among lipids employed, S1P and, even though less potent, SPC, displaced the [(3)H]S1P binding, but LPA was inactive. In Edg-6-transfected CHO cells, an increase in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration in response to S1P or SPC was clearly enhanced without change in the LPA-induced action as compared with the vector-transfected cells. The enhancement of the Ca(2+) response was associated with a significant accumulation of inositol phosphate, reflecting activation of phospholipase C. Similar enhancement of Ca(2+) response to S1P or SPC was also observed in Edg-6-expressing K562 cells. These lipid-induced actions in CHO cells and K562 cells expressing Edg-6 were markedly suppressed by pertussis toxin treatment. We conclude that Edg-6 is one of S1P or lysosphingolipid receptors that couple to phospholipase C-Ca(2+) system through pertussis toxin-sensitive G-proteins.     

Lysophospholipid mediators of immunity and neoplasia

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) and some other structurally related lysophospholipids are active growth factors and stimuli for diverse cellular functions. LPA and S1P promote early T cell migration to tissue sites of immune responses and regulate T cell proliferation and secretion of numerous cytokines. Edg-4 (LPA2) LPA receptors, which are constitutively expressed by helper T cells, and Edg-2 (LPA1) LPA receptors, which are expressed only by activated helper T cells, transduce opposite effects of LPA on some T cell responses. A similar mechanism is observed for fine regulation of Edg R-mediated effects of LPA on ovarian cancer cells. Edg-4 (LPA2) R transduces proliferative responses, recruitment of autocrine protein growth factors, and migration of ovarian cancer cells, whereas Edg-2 (LPA1) R transduces inhibition of Edg-4 (LPA2) R-mediated responses and concurrently elicits apoptosis and anoikis of ovarian cancer cells. Edg-4 (LPA2) R is a distinctive functional marker for ovarian carcinoma, and is expressed both as the wild-type and a carboxyl-terminally extended gain-of-function mutant. Newly discovered non-lipid agonists and antagonists for individual Edg receptors will permit more sophisticated analyses of their respective contributions in human biology and pathophysiology, and may represent novel therapeutic modalities in immune disorders and cancer.     

The role of lysophosphatidic acid receptors in phenotypic modulation of vascular smooth muscle cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a bioactive lipid with diverse physiological effects via activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It has been implicated as a specific dedifferentiation factors that can promote phenotypic modulation of cultured vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) which is critically involved in various vascular disease. However, the role of LPA receptors and details of their signaling in LPA induced phenotypic modulation are largely unexplored. In this study we detect the expression of LPA1 and LPA3 in rat aortic smooth muscle cells (RASMCs). LPA promoted RASMCs phenotypic modulation in a dose-dependent manner and coordinated induced the phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). LPA-induced cell phenotypic modulation was significantly inhibited by specific LPA1/LPA3-receptor antagonist dioctyl-glycerol pyrophosphate (DGPP8:0) at concentration, but this inhibitive effect was lost when the antagonist was coadministered with a highly selective LPA3 agonist,1-oleoyl-2-Omethyl-rac-glycero-phosphothionate (OMPT). In addition, pertussis toxin (PTX), a Gi protein inhibitor had little affect on the LPA-induced phenotypic modulation in RASMC. These data suggest that LPA-induced phenotypic modulation is mediated through the PTX-insensitive G-protein(s), possibly Gq-coupled LPA3 receptor.     

Lysophosphatidic Acid Enhanced the Angiogenic Capability of Human Chondrocytes by Regulating Gi/NF-kB-Dependent Angiogenic Factor Expression

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) has been found to mediate myeloid differentiation, stimulate osteogenesis, alter cell proliferation and migration, and inhibit apoptosis in chondrocytes. The effect of LPA on the angiogenic capability of chondrocytes is not clear. This study aimed to investigate its effect on the angiogenic capability of human chondrocytes and the underlying mechanism of these effects. Human chondrocyte cell line, CHON-001, commercialized human chondrocytes (HC) derived from normal human articular cartilage, and human vascular endothelial cells (HUVECs) were used as cell models in this study. The angiogenic capability of chondrocytes was determined by capillary tube formation, monolayer permeability, cell migration, and cell proliferation. An angiogenesis protein array kit was used to evaluate the secretion of angiogenic factors in conditioned medium. Angiogenin, insulin-like growth factor-binding protein 1 (IGFBP-1), interleukin (IL)-8, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9, and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) mRNA and protein expressions were evaluated by Q-RT-PCR and EIA, respectively. LPA receptor (LPAR) expression was determined by RT-PCR. Signaling pathways were clarified using inhibitors, Western blot analysis, and reporter assays. The LPA treatment promoted the angiogenic capability of CHON-001 cells and HC, resulting in enhanced HUVEC capillary tube formation, monolayer permeability, migration, and cell growth. Angiogenin, IGFBP-1, IL-8, MCP-1, MMP-9, and VEGF mRNA and protein expressions were significantly enhanced in LPA-treated chondrocytes. LPA2, 3, 4 and 6 were expressed in CHON-001 and HC cells. Pretreatment with the Gi/o type G protein inhibitor, pertussis toxin (PTX), and the NF-kB inhibitor, PDTC, significantly inhibited LPA-induced angiogenin, IGFBP-1, IL-8, MCP-1, MMP-9, and VEGF expressions in chondrocytes. The PTX pretreatment also inhibited LPA-mediated NF-kB activation, suggesting the presence of active Gi/NF-kB signaling in CHON-001 and HC cells. The effect of LPA on the angiogenesis-inducing capacity of chondrocytes may be due to the increased angiogenesis factor expression via the Gi/NF-kB signaling pathway.     

Gelsolin binding and cellular presentation of lysophosphatidic acid

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) in biological fluids binds to serum albumin and other proteins that enhance its effects on cellular functions. The actin-severing protein gelsolin binds LPA with an affinity (K(d) = 6 nm) similar to that of the G protein-coupled LPA receptors encoded by endothelial differentiation genes 2, 4, and 7 (Edg-2, -4, and -7 receptors) and greater than that of serum albumin (K(d) = 360 nm). At concentrations of 10% or less of that in plasma, which are observed in fluids of injured tissues, purified and recombinant gelsolin augment LPA stimulation of nuclear signals and protein synthesis in rat cardiac myocytes (RCMs) that express Edg-2 and -4 receptors. At concentrations of 20% or more of that in plasma, gelsolin suppresses LPA stimulation of RCMs. The lack of effect of gelsolin on RCM responses to monoclonal anti-Edg-4 receptor antibody plus a phorbol ester without LPA attests to its specificity for LPA delivery and the absence of post-receptor effects. Inhibition of gelsolin binding and cellular delivery of LPA by l-alpha-phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) and peptides constituting the two PIP2 binding domains of gelsolin suggests competition between LPA and PIP2 for the same sites. Thus, delivery of LPA to RCMs is affinity-coupled to Edg receptors by gelsolin in a PIP2-regulated process.     

Rho-dependent, Rho kinase-independent inhibitory regulation of Rac and cell migration by LPA1 receptor in Gi-inactivated CHO cells

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a major serum lysophospholipid that stimulates cell migration in diverse cell types including ovarian cancer cells. We report here that in the absence of Gi function, LPA induces inhibition, rather than stimulation, of cellular Rac activity, lamellipodium formation, and cell migration in response to insulin like growth factor I (IGF-I) in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, which solely express LPA1 as a LPA receptor. The inhibitory effects of LPA are abrogated by the expression of either Galpha13 C-terminal peptide or C3 toxin pretreatment, but not a Rho kinase inhibitor. Without PTX pretreatment, LPA stimulates Rac and cell migration yet similarly activates Rho, indicating that Rho activation by itself is not sufficient for inhibition of cell migration. Conversely, the expression of a dominant negative Rac mutant sufficiently mimics the LPA inhibition of cell migration. LPA inhibits IGF I-induced Akt activation by only 40% in a manner dependent on Rho kinase. These results demonstrate that inhibition of Gi function converts LPA regulation on Rac and cell migration to an inhibitory mode, which is mediated by G13 and Rho but not Rho kinase, and raise a possibility of Gi as a new therapeutic target for LPA-dependent tumor progression.     

Characterization of lpa(2) (Edg4) and lpa(1)/lpa(2) (Edg2/Edg4) lysophosphatidic acid receptor knockout mice: signaling deficits without obvious phenotypic abnormality attributable to lpa(2)

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a bioactive lipid produced by several cell types including postmitotic neurons and activated platelets, is thought to be involved in various biological processes, including brain development. Three cognate G protein-coupled receptors encoded by lpa(1)/lp(A1)/Edg-2/Gpcr26, lpa(2)/lp(A2)/Edg-4, and lpa(3)/lp(A3)/Edg-7 mediate the cellular effects of LPA. We have previously shown that deletion of lpa(1) in mice results in craniofacial dysmorphism, semilethality due to defective suckling behavior, and generation of a small fraction of pups with frontal hematoma. To further investigate the role of these receptors and LPA signaling in the organism, we deleted lpa(2) in mice. Homozygous knockout (lpa(2)((-/-))) mice were born at the expected frequency and displayed no obvious phenotypic abnormalities. Intercrosses allowed generation of lpa(1)((-/-)) lpa(2)((-/-)) double knockout mice, which displayed no additional phenotypic abnormalities relative to lpa(1)((-/-)) mice except for an increased incidence of perinatal frontal hematoma. Histological analyses of lpa(1)((-/-)) lpa(2)((-/-)) embryonic cerebral cortices did not reveal obvious differences in the proliferating cell population. However, many LPA-induced responses, including phospholipase C activation, Ca(2+) mobilization, adenylyl cyclase activation, proliferation, JNK activation, Akt activation, and stress fiber formation, were absent or severely reduced in embryonic fibroblasts derived from lpa(1)((-/-)) lpa(2)((-/-)) mice. Except for adenylyl cyclase activation [which was nearly abolished in lpa(1)((-/-)) fibroblasts], these responses were only partially affected in lpa(1)((-/-)) and lpa(2)((-/-)) fibroblasts. Thus, although LPA(2) is not essential for normal mouse development, it does act redundantly with LPA(1) to mediate most LPA responses in fibroblasts.     

Rho-mediated cytoskeletal rearrangement in response to LPA is functionally antagonized by Rac1 and PIP2

G-protein-coupled receptors signal through Rho to induce actin cytoskeletal rearrangement. We previously demonstrated that thrombin stimulates Rho-dependent process retraction and rounding of 1321N1 astrocytoma cells. Surprisingly, while lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) activated RhoA in 1321N1 cells, it failed to produce cell rounding. Thrombin, unlike LPA, decreased Rac1 activity, and activated (GTPase-deficient) Rac1 inhibited thrombin-stimulated cell rounding, while expression of dominant-negative Rac1 promoted LPA-induced rounding. LPA and thrombin receptors appear to differ in coupling to Gi, as LPA but not thrombin-stimulated 1321N1 cell proliferation was pertussis toxin-sensitive. Blocking Gi with pertussis toxin enabled LPA to induce cell rounding and to decrease activated Rac1. These data support the hypothesis that Rac1 and Gi activation antagonize cell rounding. Thrombin and LPA receptors also differentially activated Gq pathways as thrombin but not LPA increased InsP3 formation and reduced phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) levels. Microinjection of the plekstrin homology domain of phospholipase C (PLC)delta1, which binds PIP2, enabled LPA to elicit cell rounding, consistent with a requirement for PIP2 reduction. We suggest that Rho-mediated cytoskeletal responses are enhanced by concomitant reductions in cellular levels of PIP2 and Rac1 activation and thus effected only by G-protein-coupled receptors with appropriate subsets of G protein activation.     

Differential coupling of the sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors Edg-1, Edg-3, and H218/Edg-5 to the G(i), G(q), and G(12) families of heterotrimeric G proteins.

Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is one of several bioactive phospholipids that exert profound mitogenic and morphogenic actions. Originally characterized as a second messenger, S1P is now recognized to achieve many of its effects through cell surface, G protein-coupled receptors. We used a subunit-selective [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding assay to investigate whether the variety of actions exerted through Edg-1, a recently identified receptor for S1P, might be achieved through multiple G proteins. We found, employing both Sf9 and HEK293 cells, that Edg-1 activates only members of the G(i) family, and not G(s), G(q), G(12), or G(13). We additionally established that Edg-1 activates G(i) in response not only to S1P but also sphingosylphosphorylcholine; no effects of lysophosphatidic acid through Edg-1 were evident. Our assays further revealed a receptor(s) for S1P endogenous to HEK293 cells that mediates activation of G(13) as well as G(i). Because several of the biological actions of S1P are assumed to proceed through the G(12/13) family, we tested whether Edg-3 and H218/Edg-5, two other receptors for S1P, might have a broader coupling profile than Edg-1. Indeed, Edg-3 and H218/Edg-5 communicate not only with G(i) but also with G(q) and G(13). These studies represent the first characterization of S1P receptor activity through G proteins directly and establish fundamental differences in coupling.