Two-headed binding of the unphosphorylated nonmuscle heavy meromyosin.ADP complex to actin

The enzymatic and motor function of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II is activated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chains located in the head portion of myosin. Dimerization of the heads, which is brought about by the coiled-coil tail region, is essential for regulation since single-headed fragments are active regardless of the state of phosphorylation. Utilizing the fluorescence signal on binding of myosin to pyrene-labeled actin filaments, we investigated the interplay of actin and nucleotide binding to thiophosphorylated and unphosphorylated recombinant nonmuscle IIA heavy meromyosin constructs. We show that both heads of either thiophosphorylated or unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin bind very strongly to actin (K(d) < 10 nM) in the presence or absence of ADP. The heads have high and indistinguishable affinities for ADP (K(d) around 1 microM) when bound to actin. These findings are in line with the previously observed unusually loose coupling between nucleotide and actin binding to nonmuscle myosin IIA subfragment-1 (Kovács et al. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38132.). Furthermore, they imply that the structure of the two heads in the ternary actomyosin-ADP complex is symmetrical and that the asymmetrical structure observed in the presence of ATP and the absence of actin in previous investigations (Wendt et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4361) is likely to represent an ATPase intermediate that precedes the actomyosin-ADP state.     

Activation of heavy meromyosin adenosine triphosphatase by various states of actin.

F-actin monomer (F-monomer) is formed upon the addition of neutral salt to G-actin. Since F-monomer has a digestibility similar to that of F-actin and much lower than that of G-actin, it has been proposed that F-monomer has a conformation different from that of G-actin and similar to the conformation of the subunits in F-actin. To examine whether F-monomer will enhance the magnesium-activated myosin adenosine triphosphatase (Mg2+-ATPase) as much as F-actin, the ability of partially polymerized actin populations at equilibrium to activate the Mg2+-ATPase of heavy meromyosin was investigated. Correlations were made between ATPase activities and the polymerization state of actin as determined by measurements of viscosity and digestibility. No significant activation of the heavy meromyosin ATPase was observed under conditions where G-actin or mixtures of G-actin and F-monomer were present. As polymer formation occurred at higher actin concentrations, or with increased KCl concentrations, substantial activation characteristic of F-actin was observed. The data suggest that F-monomer may undergo a further conformational change as it forms nuclei or joins onto polymers. Alternatively, the site of actin which activates the myosin ATPase may involve the crevice between two adjacent actin subunits.     

G146V mutation at the hinge region of actin reveals a myosin class-specific requirement of actin conformations for motility

The G146V mutation in actin is dominant lethal in yeast. G146V actin filaments bind cofilin only minimally, presumably because cofilin binding requires the large and small actin domains to twist with respect to one another around the hinge region containing Gly-146, and the mutation inhibits that twisting motion. A number of studies have suggested that force generation by myosin also requires actin filaments to undergo conformational changes. This prompted us to examine the effects of the G146V mutation on myosin motility. When compared with wild-type actin filaments, G146V filaments showed a 78% slower gliding velocity and a 70% smaller stall force on surfaces coated with skeletal heavy meromyosin. In contrast, the G146V mutation had no effect on either gliding velocity or stall force on myosin V surfaces. Kinetic analyses of actin-myosin binding and ATPase activity indicated that the weaker affinity of actin filaments for myosin heads carrying ADP, as well as reduced actin-activated ATPase activity, are the cause of the diminished motility seen with skeletal myosin. Interestingly, the G146V mutation disrupted cooperative binding of myosin II heads to actin filaments. These data suggest that myosin-induced conformational changes in the actin filaments, presumably around the hinge region, are involved in mediating the motility of skeletal myosin but not myosin V and that the specific structural requirements for the actin subunits, and thus the mechanism of motility, differ among myosin classes.     

Inhibition of sliding movement of F-actin by crosslinking emphasizes the role of actin structure in the mechanism of motility

The effects of crosslinking of monomeric and polymeric actin with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and glutaraldehyde on the interaction with heavy meromyosin (HMM) in solution and on the sliding movement on glass-attached HMM were examined. The Vmax values of actin-activated HMM ATPase decreased in the following order: intact actin = EDC F-actin greater than DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than EDC G-actin. The affinity of actin for HMM in the presence of ATP decreased in the following order: DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than intact actin greater than EDC F-actin greater than EDC G-actin. However, sliding movement was inhibited only in the case of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked F and G-actin and EDC-crosslinked G-actin. Interestingly, after copolymerization of "non-motile" glutaraldehyde or EDC-crosslinked monomers with "motile" monomers of intact actin sliding of the copolymers was observed and its rate was independent of the type of crosslinked monomer, i.e. of the manner of their interaction with HMM. These data strongly indicate that inhibition of the sliding of actin by crosslinking cannot be explained entirely by changes in the Vmax value or affinity for myosin heads. We conclude that movement is generated by interaction of myosin with segments of F-actin containing a number of intact monomers, and the mechanism of inhibition involves an effect of the crosslinkers on the structure of F-actin itself.     

Calcium ions modulate regulation of smooth muscle contraction mediated by phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains

The effect of calcium ions on conformational changes of F-actin initiated by decoration of thin filaments with phosphorylated and dephosphorylated heavy meromyosin from smooth muscles was studied by fluorescence polarization spectroscopy. It is shown that heavy meromyosin with phosphorylated regulatory light chains (pHMM) promotes structural changes of F-actin which are typical for the "strong" binding of actin to the myosin heads. Heavy meromyosin with dephosphorylated regulatory light chains (dpHMM) causes conformational changes of F-actin which are typical for the "weak" binding of actin to the myosin heads. The presence of calcium enhances the pHMM effect and attenuates the dpHMM effect. We propose that a Ca2+-dependent mechanism exists in smooth muscles which modulates the regulation of actin--myosin interaction occurring via phosphorylation of myosin regulatory light chains.     

A spin-label study of phosphatidylcholine exchange protein. Regulation of the activity by phosphatidylserine and calcium ion.

The effects of the divalent cations Mg2+, Mn2+ and Ca2+ on the Brownian rotational motion of fluorescently labeled myosin, heavy meromyosin and myosin subfragment-1 were measured by the method of time-resolved fluorescence depolarization. When Mg2+ was added to solutions of myosin or heavy meromyosin and EDTA, their rotational mobility increased. Ca2+ had no effect. Mn2+ increased the mobility of heavy meromyosin but decreased that of myosin. None of these divalent cations effected the mobility of subfragment-1. The binding of heavy meromyosin to actin was affected very little by Mg2+ or EDTA over a wide range of conditions. Divalent cations appear to change the swivel about which the heads of myosin rotate, presumably by binding to light chain 2 (also called DTNB light chain). However, the heads are still able to bind actin in nearly the same way whether Mg2+ is present or not. The concentration of free Mg2+ for the mid-point of the change in heavy meromyosin mobility is in good agreement with that for EDTA activation of ATPase activity. This suggests that EDTA activation is due to removal of Mg2+ bound to myosin itself.     

The actomyosin ATPase of synthetic myosin minifilaments, filaments, and heavy meromyosin

The actin-activated ATPase activities of myosin minifilaments and heavy meromyosin are similar at high actin concentrations. Under low ionic strength conditions, the minifilaments in Tris citrate buffer yield the same maximal turnover rate (Vmax) and apparent dissociation constant of actin from myosin (Kapp) as heavy meromyosin in standard low salt conditions. The time course of actin-activated ATP hydrolysis of minifilaments is similar to that observed for standard myosin preparations. Depending on the exact protein composition of the assay mixture, either the ATPase activity declines continuously with time, or is accelerated at the onset of superprecipitation. In analogy with myosin filaments, the ATPase of minifilaments shows a biphasic dependence on actin concentration. Super-precipitation of minifilaments follows a well resolved clearing phase during which their structural integrity appears to be fully preserved. These results indicate that minifilaments or similar small assemblies of myosin can fulfill contractile functions.     

Interaction of ADP-ribosylated actin with actin binding proteins.

Actin ADP-ribosylated at Arg177 was previously shown not to polymerise after increasing the ionic strength, but to cap the barbed ends of filaments. Here we confirm that the polymerisation of ADP-ribosylated actin is inhibited, however, under specific conditions the modified actin copolymerises with native actin, indicating that its ability to take part in normal subunit interactions within filaments is not fully eliminated. We also show that ADP-ribosylated actin forms antiparallel but not parallel dimers: the former are not able to form filaments. ADP-ribosylated actin interacts with deoxyribonuclease I, vitamin D binding protein, thymosin beta(4), cofilin and gelsolin segment 1 like native actin. Interaction with myosin subfragment 1 revealed that the potential of the modified actin to aggregate into oligomers or short filaments is not fully eliminated.     

Further studies on the interaction of actin with heavy meromyosin and subfragment 1 in the presence of ATP.

It has been postulated that, during the hydrolysis of ATP, both normal and SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin undergo a rate-limiting transition from a refractory state which cannot bind to actin to a nonrefractory state which can bind to actin. This model leads to several predictions which were studied in the present work. First, the fraction of heavy meromysin or subfragment 1 which remains unbound to actin when the ATPase equals Vmax should have the same properties as the original protein. In the present study it was determined that the unbound protein has normal ATPase activity which suggests that it is unbound to actin for a kinetic reason rather than because it is a permanently altered form of the myosin. Second, if the heavy meromyosin heads act independently half as much subfragment 1 as heavy meromyosin should bind to actin. Experiments in the ultracentrifuge demonstrate that about half as much subfragment 1 as heavy meromyosin sediments with the actin at Vmax. Third, the ATP turnover rate per actin monomer at infinite heavy meromyosin concentration should be much higher than the ATP turnover rate per heavy meromyosin head at infinite actin concentration. This was found to be the case for SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin since, even at very high concentrations of SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin, in the presence of a fixed actin concentration, the actin-activated ATPase rate remained proportional to the SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin concentration. All of these results tend to confirm the refractory state model for both SH1-blocked heavy meromyosin and unmodified heavy meromyosin and subfragment 1. However, the nature of the small amount of heavy meromyosin which does bind to actin in the presence of ATP at high actin concentration remains unclear.     

Effect of Calcium Activated Factor on Properties of Actin and Myosin of Rabbit Skeletal Muscle

The effect of calcium activated factor (CAF) on enzymatic properties of actin and myosin was investigated. SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed that CAF did not degrade actin, but a slight degradation was found in myosin during CAF digestion, which might have been due to contaminated protease (s) in CAF preparation. No influence was found in EDTA ATPase of myosin and polymerization of G-actin during CAF digestion. However, heavy meromyosin (HMM) ATPase activating ability of actin was slightly decreased during CAF digestion. Although CAF digestion slightly decreased the biological activity of myofibrillar proteins, a single sarcomere prepared by CAF digestion is a useful model for studying muscle contraction because of its almost intact contractility.     

The tail of myosin reduces actin filament velocity in the in vitro motility assay

It has been observed that heavy meromyosin (HMM) propels actin filaments to higher velocities than native myosin in the in vitro motility assay, yet the reason for this difference has remained unexplained. Since the major difference between these two proteins is the presence of the tail in native myosin, we tested the hypothesis that unknown interactions between actin and the tail (LMM) slow motility in native myosin. Chymotryptic HMM and LMM were mixed in a range of molar ratios (0-5 LMM/HMM) and compared to native rat skeletal myosin in the in vitro motility assay at 30 degrees C. Increasing proportions of LMM to HMM slowed actin filament velocities, becoming equivalent to native myosin at a ratio of 3 LMM/HMM. NH4+ -ATPase assays demonstrated that HMM concentrations on the surface were constant and independent of LMM concentration, arguing against a simple displacement mechanism. Relationships between velocity and the number of available heads suggested that the duty cycle of HMM was not altered by the presence of LMM. HMM prepared with a lower chymotrypsin concentration and with very short digestion times moved actin at the same high velocity. The difference between velocities of actin filament propelled by HMM and HMM/LMM decreased with increasing ionic strength, suggesting that ionic bonds between myosin tail and actin filaments may play a role in slowing filament velocity. These data suggest the high velocities of actin filaments over HMM result from the absence of drag generated by the myosin tail, and not from proteolytic nicking of the motor domain.     

Presence of a unit for actin-myosin interaction during the superprecipitation of actomyosin.

The interaction of actin with myosin was studied in the presence of ATP at low ionic strength by means of measurements of the actin-activated ATPase activity of myosin and superprecipitation of actomyosin. At high ATP concentrations the ATPase activities of myosin, heavy meromyosin (HMM) and myosin subfragment 1 (S-1) were activated by actin in the same extent. At low ATP concentrations the myosin ATPase activity was activated about 30-fold by actin, whereas those of HMM and S-1 were stimulated only several-fold. This high actin activation of myosin ATPase was coupled with the occurrence of superprecipitation. The activation of HMM or S-1 ATPase by actin shows a simple hyperbolic dependence on actin concentration, but the myosin ATPase was maximally activated by actin at a 2:1 molar ratio of actin to myosin, and a further increase in the actin concentration had no effect on the activation. These results suggest the presence of a unit for actin-myosin interaction, composed of two actin monomers and one myosin molecule in the filaments.     

Cross-linking of actin filaments by heavy meromyosin.

The structure of acto-heavy meromyosin has been examined by electron microscopy. When heavy meromyosin is mixed with actin at ~ 2 mg/ml a gel is formed. At lower actin concentrations more ordered assemblies are formed in which the actin filaments are in “rafts” about 300 Å apart cross-linked by heavy meromyosin. These results indicate that in solution the two heads of a heavy meromyosin molecule can bind to different actin filaments.     

Effects of urea and guanidine hydrochloride on the sliding movement of actin filaments with ATP hydrolysis by myosin molecules

To evaluate the role of the hydration layer on the protein surface of actomyosin, we compared the effects of urea and guanidine-HCl on the sliding velocities and ATPase activities of the actin-heavy meromyosin (HMM) system. Both chemicals denature proteins, but only urea perturbs the hydration layer. Both the sliding velocity of actin filaments and actin-activated ATPase activity decreased with increasing urea concentrations. The sliding movement was completely inhibited at 1.0 M urea, while actin filaments were bound to HMM molecules fixed on the glass surface. Guanidine-HCl (0-0.05 M) drastically decreased both the sliding velocity and ATPase activation of acto-HMM complexes. Under this condition, actin filaments almost detached from HMM molecules. In contrast, the ATPase activity of HMM without actin filaments was almost independent of urea concentrations <1.0 M and guanidine-HCl concentrations <0.05 M. An increase in urea concentrations up to 2.0 M partly induced changes in the ternary structure of HMM molecules, while the actin filaments were stable in this concentration range. Hydration changes around such actomyosin complexes may alter both the stability of part of the myosin molecules, and the affinity for force transmission between actin filaments and myosin heads.     

Isolation and characterization of covalently cross-linked actin dimer

Covalently cross-linked actin dimer was isolated from rabbit skeletal muscle F-actin reacted with phenylenebismaleimide (Knight, P., and Offer, G. (1978) Biochem. J. 175, 1023-1032). The UV spectrum of the purified cross-linked actin dimer, in a nonpolymerizing buffer, was very similar to that of native F-actin and not to the spectrum of G-actin. Cross-linked actin dimer polymerized to filaments that were indistinguishable in the electron microscope from F-actin made from native G-actin and that were similar to native F-actin in their ability to activate the Mg2+-ATPase of myosin subfragment-1. The critical concentrations of polymerization of cross-linked actin dimer in 0.5 mM and 2.0 mM MgCl2, 2 to 4 microM, and 1 to 2 microM, respectively, were similar to the values for native G-actin. Cross-linked actin dimer contained 2 mol of bound nucleotide/mol of dimer. One bound nucleotide exchanged with ATP in solution with a t 1/2 of 55 min and with ADP with a t 1/2 of 5 h. The second bound nucleotide exchanged much more slowly. The more rapidly exchangeable site contained 10 to 15% bound ADP.Pi and 85 to 90% bound ATP while the second site contained much less, if any, bound ADP.Pi. Cross-linked actin dimer had an ATPase activity in 0.5 mM MgCl2 that was 7 times greater than the ATPase activity of native G-actin and that was also stimulated by cytochalasin D. These data are discussed in relation to the possible role of ATP in actin polymerization and function with the speculation that the cross-linked actin dimer may serve simultaneously as a useful model for each of the two different ends of native F-actin.     

Subtilisin cleavage of actin inhibits in vitro sliding movement of actin filaments over myosin

Subtilisin cleaved actin was shown to retain several properties of intact actin including the binding of heavy meromyosin (HMM), the dissociation from HMM by ATP, and the activation of HMM ATPase activity. Similar Vmax but different Km values were obtained for acto-HMM ATPase with the cleaved and intact actins. The ATPase activity of HMM stimulated by copolymers of intact and cleaved actin showed a linear dependence on the fraction of intact actin in the copolymer. The most important difference between the intact and cleaved actin was observed in an in vitro motility assay for actin sliding movement over an HMM coated surface. Only 30% of the cleaved actin filaments appeared mobile in this assay and moreover, the velocity of the mobile filaments was approximately 30% that of intact actin filaments. These results suggest that the motility of actin filaments can be uncoupled from the activation of myosin ATPase activity and is dependent on the structural integrity of actin and perhaps, dynamic changes in the actin molecule.     

Actin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Inhibition of DNase I activity has been used as an assay to purify actin from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast actin). The final fraction, obtained after a 300-fold purification, is approximately 97% pure as judged by sodium dodecyl sulfate-gel electrophoresis. Like rabbit skeletal muscle actin, yeast actin has a molecular weight of about 43,000, forms 7-nm-diameter filaments when polymerization is induced by KCl or Mg2+, and can be decorated with a proteolytic fragment of muscle myosin (heavy meromyosin). Although heavy meromyosin ATPase activity is stimulated by rabbit muscle and yeast actins to approximately the same Vmax (2 mmol of Pi per min per mumol of heavy meromyosin), half-maximal activation (Kapp) is obtained with 14 micro M muscle actin, but requires approximately 135 micro M yeast actin. This difference suggests a low affinity of yeast actin for muscle myosin. Yeast and muscle filamentous actin respond similarly to cytochalasin and phalloidin, although the drugs have no effect on S. cerevisiae cell growth.     

The Role of Structural Dynamics of Actin in Class-Specific Myosin Motility

The structural dynamics of actin, including the tilting motion between the small and large domains, are essential for proper interactions with actin-binding proteins. Gly146 is situated at the hinge between the two domains, and we previously showed that a G146V mutation leads to severe motility defects in skeletal myosin but has no effect on motility of myosin V. The present study tested the hypothesis that G146V mutation impaired rotation between the two domains, leading to such functional defects. First, our study showed that depolymerization of G146V filaments was slower than that of wild-type filaments. This result is consistent with the distinction of structural states of G146V filaments from those of the wild type, considering the recent report that stabilization of actin filaments involves rotation of the two domains. Next, we measured intramolecular FRET efficiencies between two fluorophores in the two domains with or without skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin or the heavy meromyosin equivalent of myosin V in the presence of ATP. Single-molecule FRET measurements showed that the conformations of actin subunits of control and G146V actin filaments were different in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin. This altered conformation of G146V subunits may lead to motility defects in myosin II. In contrast, distributions of FRET efficiencies of control and G146V subunits were similar in the presence of myosin V, consistent with the lack of motility defects in G146V actin with myosin V. The distribution of FRET efficiencies in the presence of myosin V was different from that in the presence of skeletal muscle heavy meromyosin, implying that the roles of actin conformation in myosin motility depend on the type of myosin.     

Cross-linking of contractile proteins from skeletal muscle by treatment with microbial transglutaminase.

The action on muscle proteins of microbial transglutaminase (MTGase), which catalyzes the formation of a "zero-length" covalent cross-link between glutamine and lysine residues in peptides, was studied in order to define a basis for future application of MTGase cross-linking to the study of muscle protein interaction. We examined the cross-linking of skeletal muscle myosin, myosin subfragments, actin, and myofibrils by treatment with MTGase and the possible side-effects of the cross-linking on the enzymic activity of myosin, and found that the rod portions of myosin in myosin filaments were quickly cross-linked to each other by the action of MTGase, but myosin subfragment 1 was not cross-linked to actin. The MgATPase activities at 0.5 M KCl of myosin, heavy meromyosin, subfragment 1, and subfragment 1-actin were not significantly affected by the MTGase reaction. A very small fraction of the head portion of heavy meromyosin was cross-linked to actin in their rigor complexes by MTGase, and the ATPase activity at 0.5 M KCl of the cross-linked heavy meromyosin-actin complexes was slightly enhanced.     

Actin—membrane interactions: Association of G-actin with the red cell membrane

Chemically tritiated actin from rabbit skeletal muscle was used to investigate the association of G-actin with the red cell membrane. The tritiated actin was shown to be identical to unmodified actin in its ability to polymerize and to activate heavy meromyosin ATPase. Using sealed and unsealed red cell ghosts we have shown that G-actin binds to the cytoplasmic but not the extracellular membrane surface of ghosts. Inside-out vesicles which have been stripped of endogenous actin and spectrin by low-ionic-strength incubation bind little G-actin. However, when a crude spectrin extract containing primarily spectrin, actin, and band 4.1 is added back to stripped vesicles, subsequent binding of G-actin can be increased up to 40-fold. Further, this crude spectrin extract can compete for and abolish G-actin binding to unsealed ghosts. Actin binding to ghosts increases linearly with added G-actin and requires the presence of magnesium. In addition, actin binding is inhibited by cytochalasin B and DNAase I. Negative staining reveals an abundance of actin filaments formed when G-actin is added to reconstituted inside-out vesicles but none when it is added to unreconstituted vesicles. These observations indicate that added G-actin binds to the red cell membrane via filament formation nucleated by some membrane component at the cytoplasmic surface.