Tissue‐specific and light‐dependent regulation of phytochrome gene expression in rice

Phytochromes are red‐ and far red light photoreceptors in higher plants. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) has three phytochromes (phyA, phyB and phyC), which play distinct as well as cooperative roles in light perception. To gain a better understanding of individual phytochrome functions in rice, expression patterns of three phytochrome genes were characterized using promoter‐GUS fusion constructs. The phytochrome genes PHYA and PHYB showed distinct patterns of tissue‐ and developmental stage‐specific expression in rice. The PHYA promoter‐GUS was expressed in all leaf tissues in etiolated seedlings, while its expression was restricted to vascular bundles in expanded leaves of light‐grown seedlings. These observations suggest that light represses the expression of the PHYA gene in all cells except vascular bundle cells in rice seedlings. Red light was effective, but far red light was ineffective in gene repression, and red light‐induced repression was not observed in phyB mutants. These results indicate that phyB is involved in light‐dependent and tissue‐specific repression of the PHYA gene in rice.     

Mapping the interaction sites of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Aspergillus nidulans</Emphasis> phytochrome FphA with the global regulator VeA and the White Collar protein LreB

Aspergillus nidulans senses red and blue-light and employs a phytochrome and a Neurospora crassa White Collar (WC) homologous system for light perception and transmits this information into developmental decisions. Under light conditions it undergoes asexual development and in the dark it develops sexually. The phytochrome FphA consists of a light sensory domain and a signal output domain, consisting of a histidine kinase and a response regulator domain. Previously it was shown that the phytochrome FphA directly interacts with the WC-2 homologue, LreB and another regulator, VeA. In this paper we mapped the interaction of FphA with LreB to the histidine kinase and the response regulator domain at the C-terminus in vivo using the bimolecular fluorescence complementation assay and in vitro by co-immunoprecipitation. In comparison, VeA interacted with FphA only at the histidine kinase domain. We present evidence that VeA occurs as a phosphorylated and a non-phosphorylated form in the cell. The phosphorylation status of the protein was independent of the light receptors FphA, LreB and the WC-1 homologue LreA.     

Genome-wide analyses of light-regulated genes in Aspergillus nidulans reveal a complex interplay between different photoreceptors and novel photoreceptor functions

Fungi sense light of different wavelengths using blue-, green-, and red-light photoreceptors. Blue light sensing requires the “white-collar” proteins with flavin as chromophore, and red light is sensed through phytochrome. Here we analyzed genome-wide gene expression changes caused by short-term, low-light intensity illumination with blue-, red- or far-red light in Aspergillus nidulans and found that more than 1100 genes were differentially regulated. The largest number of up- and downregulated genes depended on the phytochrome FphA and the attached HOG pathway. FphA and the white-collar orthologue LreA fulfill activating but also repressing functions under all light conditions and both appear to have roles in the dark. Additionally, we found about 100 genes, which are red-light induced in the absence of phytochrome, suggesting alternative red-light sensing systems. We also found blue-light induced genes in the absence of the blue-light receptor LreA. We present evidence that cryptochrome may be part of this regulatory cue, but that phytochrome is essential for the response. In addition to in vivo data showing that FphA is involved in blue-light sensing, we performed spectroscopy of purified phytochrome and show that it responds indeed to blue light.     

Functional and physical interaction of blue- and red-light sensors in Aspergillus nidulans

Light sensing is very important for organisms in all biological kingdoms to adapt to changing environmental conditions. It was discovered recently that plant-like phytochrome is involved in light sensing in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans[1]. Here, we show that phytochrome (FphA) is part of a protein complex containing LreA (WC-1) and LreB (WC-2) [2, 3], two central components of the Neurospora crassa blue-light-sensing system. We found that FphA represses sexual development and mycotoxin formation, whereas LreA and LreB stimulate both. Surprisingly, FphA interacted with LreB and with VeA, another regulator involved in light sensing and mycotoxin biosynthesis. LreB also interacted with LreA. All protein interactions occurred in the nucleus, despite cytoplasmic subfractions of the proteins. Whereas the FphA-VeA interaction was dependent on the presence of the linear tetrapyrrole in FphA, the interaction between FphA and LreB was chromophore independent. These results suggest that morphological and physiological differentiations in A. nidulans are mediated through a network consisting of FphA, LreA, LreB, and VeA acting in a large protein complex in the nucleus, sensing red and blue light.     

Photosensing fungi: phytochrome in the spotlight

Red light triggers asexual development and represses sexual development in the fungus Aspergillus nidulans. This response has been shown to require a phytochrome red/far-red light photoreceptor, FphA, which is cytoplasmic and binds a tetrapyrrole chromophore. FphA exhibits similarities to both plant and bacterial phytochromes.     

Red And far‐red regulation of filament movement correlates with the expression of phytochrome and FHY1 genes in Spirogyra varians (Zygnematales,Streptophyta)1

Spirogyra filaments show unique photomovement that differs in response to blue, red, and far‐red light. Phototropins involved in the blue‐light movement have been characterized together with downstream signaling components, but the photoreceptors and mechanical effectors of red‐ and far‐red light movement are not yet characterized. The filaments of Spirogyra varians slowly bent and aggregated to form a tangled mass in red light. In far‐red light, the filaments unbent, stretched rapidly, and separated from each other. Mannitol and/or sorbitol treatment significantly inhibited this far‐red light movement suggesting that turgor pressure is the driving force of this movement. The bending and aggregating movements of filaments in red light were not affected by osmotic change. Three phytochrome homologues isolated from S. varians showed unique phylogenetic characteristics. Two canonical phytochromes, named SvPHY1 and SvPHY2, and a noncanonical phytochrome named SvPHYX2. SvPHY1 is the first PHY1 family phytochrome reported in zygnematalean algae. The gene involved in the transport of phytochromes into the nucleus was characterized, and its expression in response to red and far‐red light was measured using quantitative PCR. Our results suggest that the phytochromes and the genes involved in the transport system into the nucleus are well conserved in S. varians.     

fhy1 defines a branch point in phytochrome A signal transduction pathways for gene expression

Physiological analysis of the fhy1 mutant of Arabidopsis has led to the proposal that the mutant is deficient in a downstream component of the phytochrome A signal transduction pathway. To define this lesion at the molecular level, we have examined the expression of a range of phytochrome-regulated genes in fhy1. In far-red light, the regulation of genes such as CHS and CHI is blocked in fhy1, whereas the induction of CAB and NR genes is affected minimally. In contrast, the induction of all genes tested is blocked in a phytochrome A-deficient mutant, confirming that gene expression in far-red light is regulated solely by phytochrome A. Thus, fhy1 defines a branch point in phytochrome A signal transduction pathways for gene expression. Contrary to the general opinion that responses to continuous red light are mediated by phytochrome B and other photostable phytochromes, we have shown also that red light-induction of CHS is mediated almost entirely by phytochrome A. Furthermore, phytochrome A-mediated induction of CHS by red light is blocked in fhy1. The induction of CHS by blue light, however, is normal in fhy1, suggesting that although FHY1 is a component of the phytochrome A signaling pathway, it is not a component of the blue-light signaling pathway for CHS expression.     

The fungal phytochrome FphA from Aspergillus nidulans

The red light-sensing photoreceptor FphA from Aspergillus nidulans is involved in the regulation of developmental processes in response to light. Here we present extended biochemical and spectroscopic characterization of recombinant FphA using a synthetic gene with host-adapted codon usage. The recombinant photosensory domain FphAN753 was shown to display all features of a bona fide phytochrome. It covalently binds biliverdin as chromophore and undergoes red/far-red light-inducible photoconversion with both parent states being protonated. The large N-terminal variable extension of FphA exerts a stabilizing effect on the active Pfr state. Upon substitution of the highly conserved histidine 504, involved in the hydrogen-bonding network of the protein moiety and the chromophore, chromophore attachment and photoreversibility were completely impaired. FphA is a functional sensor histidine kinase with a strong red-light-dependent autophosphorylation activity. Furthermore, intermolecular trans-phosphorylation to the response regulator domain of a second monomer could be demonstrated. Interestingly, co-incubation of FphA and FphA variants led to enhanced autophosphorylation, including the "inactive" Pr form. The latter observed phenomenon might suggest that auto- and trans-phosphorylation activity is modulated by additional interaction partners leading to variable phosphorylation events that trigger a specific output response.     

Far‐red light enhances photochemical efficiency in a wavelength‐dependent manner

Linear electron transport depends on balanced excitation of photosystem I and II. Far‐red light preferentially excites photosystem I (PSI) and can enhance the photosynthetic efficiency when combined with light that over‐excites photosystem II (PSII). The efficiency of different wavelengths of far‐red light exciting PSI was quantified by measuring the change in quantum yield of PSII (Φ_PSII) of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) under red/blue light with narrowband far‐red light added (from 678 to 752 nm, obtained using laser diodes). The Φ_PSII of lettuce increased with increasing wavelengths of added light from 678 to 703 nm, indicating longer wavelengths within this region are increasingly used more efficiently by PSI than by PSII. Adding 721 nm light resulted in similar Φ_PSII as adding 703 nm light, but Φ_PSII tended to decrease as wavelength increased from 721 to 731 nm, likely due to decreasing absorptance and low photon energy. Adding 752 nm light did not affect Φ_PSII. Leaf chlorophyll fluorescence light response measurements showed lettuce had higher Φ_PSII under halogen light (rich in far‐red) than under red/blue light (which over‐excites PSII). Far‐red light is more photosynthetically active than commonly believed, because of its synergistic interaction with light of shorter wavelengths.     

Involvement of phytochrome and a blue light photoreceptor in UV-B induced flavonoid synthesis in parsley (Petroselinum hortense Hoffm.) cell suspension cultures

Flavonoid synthesis in cell suspension cultures of parsley (Petroselinum hortense Hoffm.) occurs only after irradiation with ultraviolet light (UV), mainly from the UV-B (280–320 nm) spectral range. However, it is also controlled by phytochrome. A P_fr/P_tot ratio of approximately 20% is sufficient for a maximum phytochrome response as induced by pulse irradiation. Continuous red and far red light, as well as blue light, given after UV, are more effective than pulse irradiations. The response to blue light is considerably greater than that to red and far red light. Continuous red and blue light treatments can be substituted for by multiple pulses and can thus probably be ascribed to a multible induction effect. Continuous irradiations with red, far red and blue light also increase the UV-induced flavonoid synthesis if given before UV. The data indicate that besides phytochrome a separate blue light photoreceptor is involved in the regulation of the UV-induced flavonoid synthesis. This blue light receptor seems to require the presence of P_fr in order to be fully effective.Abbreviations HIR high irradiance response - P_fr far red absorhing form of phytochrome - P_tet total phytochrome - UV ultraviolet light