Recovery of different Listeria ribotypes from naturally contaminated, raw refrigerated meat and poultry products with two primary enrichment media.

Isolation rates for Listeria monocytogenes and the other Listeria spp. typically improve when samples are enriched in more than one primary enrichment medium. This study evaluated the abilities of two primary enrichment media, University of Vermont-modified Listeria enrichment broth (UVM) and Listeria repair broth (LRB), to recover different ribotypes of Listeria spp. from raw meat and poultry samples. Forty-five paired 25-g retail samples of ground beef, pork sausage, ground turkey, and chicken (160 samples) underwent primary enrichment in UVM and LRB (30 degrees C for 24 h) followed by secondary enrichment in Fraser broth (35 degrees C for 24 and 40 h) and plating on modified Oxford agar. After 24 h of incubation of 35 degrees C, 608 Listeria colonies from selected positive samples were biochemically confirmed as L. monocytogenes (245 isolates), L innocua (276 isolates), and L. welshimeri (89 isolates) and then ribotyped with the automated Riboprinter microbial characterization system (E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., Inc.). Thirty-six different Listeria strains comprising 16 L. monocytogenes (including four known clinical ribotypes), 12 L. innocua, and 8 L. welshimeri ribotypes were identified from selected positive samples (15 samples of each product type; two UVM and two LRB isolates per sample). Twenty-six of 36(13 L. monocytogenes) ribotypes were detected with both UVM and LRB, whereas 3 of 36 (1 L. monocytogenes) and 7 of 36 (3 L. monocytogenes) Listeria ribotypes were observed with only UVM or LRB, respectively. Ground beef, pork sausage, ground turkey, and chicken yielded 22 (8 L. monocytogenes), 21 (12 L. monocytogenes), 20 (9 L. monocytogenes), and 19 (11 L. monocytogenes) different Listeria ribotypes, respectively, with some Listeria ribotypes confined to a particular product. More importantly, major differences in both the number and distribution of Listeria ribotypes, including previously recognized clinical and nonclinical ribotypes of L. monocytogenes, were observed when 10 UVM and 10 LRB isolates from five samples of each product were ribotyped. When a third set of six samples per product type was examined from which two Listeria isolates were obtained by using only one of the two primary enrichment media, UVM and LRB failed to detect L. monocytogenes (both clinical and nonclinical ribotypes) in two and four samples, respectively. These findings stress the importance of using more than one primary enrichment medium and picking a sufficient number of colonies per sample when attempting to isolate specific L. monocytogenes strains during investigations of food-borne listeriosis.     

Evaluation of a new chromogenic agar for the detection of Listeria in food

AIM: Rapid identification of Listeria in food is important in protecting consumers from infection. The development of chromogenic media such as agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti (ALOA) has allowed more rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes, with presumptive identification of this pathogenic species after only 24 h of incubation. The aim of this study was to evaluate Oxoid chromogenic Listeria agar (OCLA) in comparison with ALOA and a traditional, nonchromogenic medium, Oxford agar. METHODS AND RESULTS: Media were compared using pure cultures, spiked food samples and naturally contaminated samples. Whilst development of typical colony morphology took 48 h on Oxford agar, Listeria spp. were frequently detected after 24 h of incubation on OCLA and ALOA. There was no significant difference in recovery between the two chromogenic media. CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that OCLA gives equivalent recovery of Listeria spp. compared with ALOA. Whilst L. monocytogenes was frequently detected after 24 h of incubation, a 48-h incubation time was necessary to ensure detection of both L. monocytogenes and other Listeria spp. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study has shown that a commercially available chromogenic medium other than ALOA is appropriate for use in the international standard method. The commercial availability of more than one medium will facilitate the more widespread use of the method, thus increasing confidence in the ability to detect L. monocytogenes in food in the presence of other Listeria spp.     

Specific detection of cytopathogenic Listeria monocytogenes using a two-step method of immunoseparation and cytotoxicity analysis

The development of rapid methods for detection of viable Listeria monocytogenes is crucial to prevent listeriosis and product recalls. While immunomagnetic separation has been used for isolating Listeria spp., lack of specificity and pathogenicity determination render this method unsatisfactory. A two-step method using Protein A agarose beads (Immunobeads) coated with a more specific antibody, monoclonal antibody (MAb)-C11E9 for L. monocytogenes was developed. Immunobeads were allowed to capture Listeria cells from a variety of samples and tested for cytopathogenic action on a murine hybridoma B-lymphocyte, Ped-2E9 cell line by Trypan blue staining, and by an alkaline phosphatase (AP)-based cytotoxicity assay. The two-step method was used to test uninoculated hotdogs, bologna, and raw beef, chicken, and pork samples, following selective enrichment in half-Fraser broth. Pure culture studies proved the assay to be specific for L. monocytogenes, while a similar assay with Dynal Anti-Listeria immunomagnetic beads was positive for L. monocytogenes, L. ivanovii, and L. seeligeri. Detection and confirmation of cytopathogenicity of Listeria cells from food samples after 24-h selective enrichment were completed in 2-4 h. Isolates were further analyzed by the CAMP test for hemolytic activity and RiboPrinter for genomic patterns. Using immunoseparation and cytotoxicity as a two-step rapid method, viable L. monocytogenes could be isolated, detected, and confirmed as cytopathogenic in 28 h or less.     

Evaluation of BBL CHROMagar Listeria agar for the isolation and identification of Listeria monocytogenes from food and environmental samples

The performance of BBL CHROMagar Listeria chromogenic agar for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes was evaluated for its ability to isolate and identify L. monocytogenes from food and environmental samples. The medium was compared to non-chromogenic selective agars commonly used for Listeria isolation: Oxford, Modified Oxford, and PALCAM. BBL CHROMagar Listeria had a sensitivity of 99% and 100% for the detection of L. monocytogenes from 200 natural and artificially inoculated food samples, respectively, with a colony confirmation rate of 100%. The sensitivity of non-chromogenic selective media for the detection of L. monocytogenes from these same samples was 97-99% with colony confirmation rates of 65-67.5%. From 93 environmental samples, BBL CHROMagar Listeria agar results correlated 100% with a Listeria spp. visual immunoassay (TECRA) performed on these same samples and the USDA-FSIS standard culture method for the isolation of L. monocytogenes. From environmental samples, the L. monocytogenes confirmation rate was 100% for BBL CHROMagar Listeria as compared to 50% for conventional agars tested. On BBL CHROMagar Listeria, L. monocytogenes forms a translucent white precipitation zone (halo) surrounding blue-pigmented colonies of 2-3 mm in diameter, with an entire border. BBL CHROMagar Listeria offers a high degree of specificity for the confirmation of suspect L. monocytogenes colonies, whereas non-chromogenic selective agars evaluated were not differential for L. monocytogenes from other Listeria species.     

Microbiological quality and safety of zoo food

Two types of commercial products for feeding zoo animals (a frozen meat product, referred to as zoo food, and a dry product, referred to as dry food) were microbiologically examined for spoilage organisms (aerobic, psychrotrophic, coliform, Escherichia coli, mold, and yeasts) and pathogens (Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter jejuni). Levels of microorganisms in frozen ground zoo food were compared with those in frozen ground beef and frozen ground turkey meat. The level of microbial contaminants in frozen ground zoo meat was found to be similar to that in frozen ground beef and higher than that in frozen ground turkey meat. Sixty percent of the frozen zoo meat samples were Salmonella positive, and all of the samples were L. monocytogenes positive. Dry zoo food was documented to have microbial levels lower than those in frozen zoo meat; the pathogen levels were less than 1/25 g of food. Defrosting zoo meat at 10, 25, and 37 degrees C for 24 h showed that 10 degrees C is the best temperature for defrosting frozen ground zoo meat loaves (length, 9 in. [22.8 cm]; radius, 2 in. [5.1 cm]) without affecting the microbiological quality or safety of the product.     

Microbiological quality and safety of zoo food.

Two types of commercial products for feeding zoo animals (a frozen meat product, referred to as zoo food, and a dry product, referred to as dry food) were microbiologically examined for spoilage organisms (aerobic, psychrotrophic, coliform, Escherichia coli, mold, and yeasts) and pathogens (Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, and Campylobacter jejuni). Levels of microorganisms in frozen ground zoo food were compared with those in frozen ground beef and frozen ground turkey meat. The level of microbial contaminants in frozen ground zoo meat was found to be similar to that in frozen ground beef and higher than that in frozen ground turkey meat. Sixty percent of the frozen zoo meat samples were Salmonella positive, and all of the samples were L. monocytogenes positive. Dry zoo food was documented to have microbial levels lower than those in frozen zoo meat; the pathogen levels were less than 1/25 g of food. Defrosting zoo meat at 10, 25, and 37 degrees C for 24 h showed that 10 degrees C is the best temperature for defrosting frozen ground zoo meat loaves (length, 9 in. [22.8 cm]; radius, 2 in. [5.1 cm]) without affecting the microbiological quality or safety of the product.     

Direct identification in food samples of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes by molecular methods

A new molecular approach for the detection and identification of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in food is presented here. The method is based on the PCR amplification of a fragment of the iap gene from the five species belonging to the genus and on the analysis of the PCR products obtained by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). The protocol was first optimized by using strains from international collections. Based on the differences present in the sequences amplified, it was possible to obtain species-specific DGGE migration that allowed fast and easy identification of L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, L. welshimeri, L. seeligeri, and L. ivanovii. Moreover, for L. monocytogenes serotypes, partial differentiation was possible. The optimized protocol was used for identification of Listeria strains traditionally isolated from food and for direct detection and identification of Listeria members in food after an overnight enrichment. Identification of 48 food isolates and direct detection of Listeria spp. in 73 food samples show the potential of the method that can be used as a fast screening test to investigate the presence of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes in food.     

Comparison of selective and non-selective enrichment media in the detection of Listeria monocytogenes from meat containing Listeria innocua

AIMS: This study investigated whether the higher incidence of recovery from meat of Listeria innocua compared with L. monocytogenes could be due to the laboratory media used, leading to an artificially lower detection of the pathogenic species, L. monocytogenes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Minced beef was inoculated with L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, or a mixture of these species, and stored at 0 or 10 degrees C under vacuum or aerobic conditions for up to 28 days. Listeria were recovered from the minced beef using selective (University of Vermont Medium, UVM) and non-selective (Buffered Peptone Water, BPW) enrichment broths after 0, 14, and 28 days of storage. In general, there were no significant differences (P < 0.05) between the numbers of L. monocytogenes recovered from minced beef samples after 24 h enrichment in BPW and the numbers recovered using UVM. In addition, the presence of L. innocua in meat samples containing L. monocytogenes did not significantly (P < 0.05) affect the numbers of L. monocytogenes recovered using either enrichment broth. In most cases there were no significant differences (P < 0.05) between the numbers of L. innocua recovered from minced beef samples after 24 h enrichment in BPW compared with numbers recovered using UVM. CONCLUSION: Listeria innocua was found to have no significant competitive advantage over L. monocytogenes in selective or non-selective enrichment media. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results suggest that, in some instances, the use of a selective enrichment broth offers no advantage over a non-selective enrichment broth for the recovery of Listeria species from minced beef.     

Rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes by PCR-ELISA

A rapid detection system specific for Listeria monocytogenes based upon the polymerase chain reaction was developed. The specificity of the primers and the probe annealing to the coding region of the mpl gene proved positive with the DNA from a total of 103 L. monocytogenes strains, while DNA from another 73 Listeria and non-Listeria strains tested negative. To facilitate detection with large numbers of samples, a microtitre plate assay was established with biotinylated probes. Use of a standard DNA prevented false-negative results when used as an internal amplification control in the PCR-ELISA. As the described method required approximately 5-6 h to be completed it may prove useful in the detection of L. monocytogenes in food.     

Rapid detection of low levels of Listeria in foods and next-day confirmation of L. monocytogenes

Outbreaks of foodborne listeriosis caused by Listeria monocytogenes in recent years, and the high mortality rate associated with listeriosis, have raised the need for reliable and rapid detection of the pathogen. A simple, automated method was developed for the detection of Listeria organisms in foods. It consists of a 6-h pre-enrichment step followed by overnight incubation in selective broth at 35 degrees C. Changes in light transmittance in the selective broth are registered continuously by an optical sensor of the BioSys instrument (MicroSys, Ann Arbor, MI), and recorded in the computer. Esculin hydrolysis by listeriae results in black coloration of the media that causes a sharp drop in light transmittance, whereas negative samples remain colorless. Confirmation of L. monocytogenes is carried out only on esculin-positive samples and is completed within 6 h. Detection of 10-50 cells of Listeria inoculated into 25 g of food was confirmed in shell eggs, milk and ground beef. Naturally contaminated raw and ready-to-eat foods were further screened to validate the procedure.     

Evaluation of chromogenic media for the detection of Listeria species in food

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of chromogenic agars, Agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti (ALOA) and Rapid L. mono agar, compared with Oxford agar for the enumeration and detection of Listeria species in food. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 170 food samples were examined using the three plating media. Listeria species were isolated from 63 samples. In contrast to Oxford agar, detection of Listeria colonies on chromogenic media was as good after 24 h of incubation of plates as after 48 h. While there was no significant difference in recovery of Listeria monocytogenes on the three media, recovery of other Listeria species was significantly poorer on Rapid L. mono agar compared with Oxford and ALOA agars. Recovery of species other than L. monocytogenes was significantly improved by including a secondary enrichment stage in the detection method. CONCLUSIONS: Using chromogenic agars, presumptive identification of L. monocytogenes is possible after 24 h, compared with 3-4 days using Oxford agar. However, the poor detection of species other than L. monocytogenes on Rapid L. mono agar is a disadvantage of this medium. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study provides new information regarding the isolation of Listeria species other than L. monocytogenes from food using chromogenic plating media. This is important, as non-pathogenic Listeria species act as markers for the likelihood of presence of L. monocytogenes and allow preventive action to be taken to avoid its presence.     

Evaluation of enhanced haemolysis agar for detection of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes from production lines of fresh to cold-smoked fish.

Enhanced haemolysis agar (EHA) was compared to the two conventional Listeria isolation agars Oxford and PALCAM for its ability to detect Listeria spp. from production lines of fresh to cold-smoked fish. The ability of EHA for distinguishing L. monocytogenes colonies from other Listeria spp. was also evaluated.A total of 243 fish and environmental samples were analysed. Overall, 42 samples were found to contain Listeria spp. Only 34 samples were positive simultaneously by the three plating media. Two samples considered to be negative by the two conventional agars were found to be positive after isolation on EHA. All three selective agars were shown to be less effective in recovering Listeria spp. after primary enrichment in half-Fraser broth, compared to secondary enrichment in Fraser broth after 24 and 48 h.From 79 Listeria but presumptive negative L. monocytogenes colonies, EHA identified correctly 76 Listeria spp. and presented three false-negative results_three colonies further identified as L. monocytogenes but showing no noticeable haemolysis on EHA. Twenty-three of the thirty-three L. monocytogenes presumptive positive colonies, were confirmed positive and ten were identified as L. seeligeri.Despite its ability of distinguishing L. monocytogenes from the other Listeria spp., unless it is produced as a commercial medium, EHA cannot be an alternative to time-consuming classical identification because the preparation of this medium is both time and labour intensive.     

RAPID DETECTION OF LISTERIA MONOCYTOGENES IN GROUND TURKEY BY IMMUNOMAGNETIC SEPARATION AND POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of Listeria monocytogenes in packaged fresh ground turkey in Turkey using immunomagnetic separation (IMS) as a selective enrichment step in method and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A total of 180 ground turkey samples were collected during a 1-year period. Thirty-two (17.7%) of the samples contained L. monocytogenes, 24 (13.3%) contained Listeria innocua, 7 (3.8%) had Listeria ivanovii and 5 (2.7%) had Listeria seeligeri by means of IMS-based cultivation method. A PCR assay was performed, based on hlyA gene-specific primers. In all L. monocytogenes isolates, hlyA gene was confirmed, indicating that the correlation between IMS-based cultivation and PCR methods was 100%. The results suggest that the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in ground turkey is relatively high in Turkey and that ground turkey should be produced under appropriate hygienic and technological conditions for the prevention of public health hazards.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

Using fast and reliable methods to detect and identify foodborne pathogenic bacteria, including Listeria monocytogenes , is important to detect the risk of contaminated product and protect public health. In some ways it is time-consuming to isolate and identify the pathogenic microorganisms from food products using conventional techniques. Different methods or techniques can be used both for redounding the isolation chance and to gain time for this purpose. Immunomagnetic separation (IMS) and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) techniques are effective and rapid methods for separation, detection and confirmation of Listeria spp. from foods. In this study rapid, specific and sensitive IMS method was used to determine the prevalence of L. monocytogenes in fresh ground turkey and PCR technique was used for the verification of the L. monocytogenes isolates.     

A comparison of immunomagnetic and surface adhesion immunofluorescent techniques for the rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innocua in meat

an immunomagnetic immunofluorescent method was investigated for the rapid detection of Listeria monocytogenes and Listeria innouca . This technique involved enrichment of the suspect sample at 30°C overnight. Listeria monocytogenes cells were isolated from the enriched sample using immunomagnetic separation and Listeria were subsequently visualized using an immunofluorescent microscopy technique. This technique was used in the detection of Listeria cells from pure culture, inoculated beef mince samples and naturally contaminated retail beef mince samples. A detection level of approximately 1×10³ cfu ml⁻¹ was achieved. When compared with traditional detection methods no false negatives or positives were recorded for L. monocytogenes or L. innocua . The immunomagnetic immunofluorescent technique had a detection level similar to a previously described surface adhesion immunofluorescent technique. Isolation of the Listeria cells by surface adhesion involved dipping a membrane attached to a microscope slide into the enriched sample for 10 min. This was quicker and simpler to perform than the immunomagnetic separation technique which took 2 h to carry out.     

Occurrence of Listeria species in raw milk and dairy products produced in Northern Ireland.

The overall incidence of Listeria spp. in raw milk samples surveyed was found to be 25.0% (Listeria monocytogenes 15.3%), with the incidence in samples from processing centres 54.0% (L. monocytogenes 33.3%); this was higher than that in samples from dairy farms (Listeria spp. 8.8%; L. monocytogenes 5.3%). The FDA enrichment procedure was much more productive than cold enrichment and Oxford agar was superior to modified McBride agar for isolation of Listeria. Listeria monocytogenes was never isolated by direct plating of raw milk samples on Oxford agar at a detection level of 1.0 cfu/ml. Listeria spp. were isolated from 1 of 95 pasteurized milk samples (L. monocytogenes) and 1 of 33 soft cheese samples (L. seeligeri). Restriction fragment length polymorphism was more useful than sero- or phage-typing for typing of L. monocytogenes strains, and results suggest that specific L. monocytogenes strains may persist in both farm and processing environments.     

Sensitive and specific detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground beef with the polymerase chain reaction.

A sensitive and specific method for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground-beef samples is described. It consists of culturing samples in listeria enrichment broth (LEB) and subculturing them from LEB to listeria plating media, followed by DNA extraction and species-specific detection of the organism by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In developing the L. monocytogenes PCR assay, five oligonucleotide primers complementary to the nucleotide sequence of the listeriolysin O gene were synthesized and used in amplification experiments. PCR products of the predicted size, based on nucleotide sequence information, were generated with DNA from all of 72 L. monocytogenes strains with five different primer pairs. DNA from Listeria ivanovii, Listeria innocua, Listeria seeligeri, Listeria welshimeri, Listeria grayi, and Listeia murrayi strains and a panel of 47 bacterial strains representing 17 genera did not generate PCR products with the primer pairs employed. As little as 1 pg of L. monocytogenes DNA could be detected with the assay. To determine the most sensitive culture protocol to use in conjunction with the PCR assay, milk (10 ml) and ground-beef (25 g) samples were inoculated with L. monocytogenes at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10(5) CFU ml-1 or g-1, as appropriate for the sample. PCR assays on DNA extracted from growth on listeria plating media, inoculated with 24-h LEB samples cultures, were most sensitive, allowing detection of as little as 0.1 CFU of L. monocytogenes ml-1 or g-1 of milk and ground beef, respectively.     

Sensitive and specific detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground beef with the polymerase chain reaction.

A sensitive and specific method for detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk and ground-beef samples is described. It consists of culturing samples in listeria enrichment broth (LEB) and subculturing them from LEB to listeria plating media, followed by DNA extraction and species-specific detection of the organism by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR). In developing the L. monocytogenes PCR assay, five oligonucleotide primers complementary to the nucleotide sequence of the listeriolysin O gene were synthesized and used in amplification experiments. PCR products of the predicted size, based on nucleotide sequence information, were generated with DNA from all of 72 L. monocytogenes strains with five different primer pairs. DNA from Listeria ivanovii, Listeria innocua, Listeria seeligeri, Listeria welshimeri, Listeria grayi, and Listeia murrayi strains and a panel of 47 bacterial strains representing 17 genera did not generate PCR products with the primer pairs employed. As little as 1 pg of L. monocytogenes DNA could be detected with the assay. To determine the most sensitive culture protocol to use in conjunction with the PCR assay, milk (10 ml) and ground-beef (25 g) samples were inoculated with L. monocytogenes at concentrations ranging from 0 to 10(5) CFU ml-1 or g-1, as appropriate for the sample. PCR assays on DNA extracted from growth on listeria plating media, inoculated with 24-h LEB samples cultures, were most sensitive, allowing detection of as little as 0.1 CFU of L. monocytogenes ml-1 or g-1 of milk and ground beef, respectively.     

Occurrence of Listeria species in raw milk and dairy products produced in Northern Ireland

J. HARVEY AND A. GILMOUR. 1992. The overall incidence of Listeria spp. in raw milk samples surveyed was found to be 25.0% ( Listeria monocytogenes 15.3%), with the incidence in samples from processing centres 54.0% ( L. monocytogenes 33.3%); this was higher than that in samples from dairy farms ( Listeria spp. 8.8% L. monocytogenes 5.3%). The FDA enrichment procedure was much more productive than cold enrichment and Oxford agar was superior to modified McBride agar for isolation of Listeria. Listeria monocytogenes was never isolated by direct plating of raw milk samples on Oxford agar at a detection level of 1.0 cfu/ml. Listeria spp. were isolated from 1 of 95 pasteurized milk samples ( L. monocytogenes ) and 1 of 33 soft cheese samples ( L. seeligeri ). Restriction fragment length polymorphism was more useful than sero- or phage-typing for typing of L. monocytogenes strains, and results suggest that specific L. monocytogenes strains may persist in both farm and processing environments.     

RECOVERY and SPECIATION of LISTERIA FROM RAW and COOKED MEAT and POULTRY PRODUCTS

Recovery of Listeria from raw and cooked meat products was compared using Fraser broth (FB) enrichment incubated at 30 and 35C for 24 and 48 h. the Micro-ID Listeria test strip for biochemical characterization of Listeria was also compared with conventional tests. Listeria spp. were recovered from 33, 47, and 20 of the raw chicken, raw beef and cooked meat products, respectively. No false-negative reactions were observed and more total Listeria -positive samples were found using FB incubated for 48 h compared with 24 h. Samples incubated at 35C had fewer false negative tubes than those incubated at 30C. More false-positive FB tubes were observed after 48 h than after 24 h incubation. Over half of the cooked samples did not hydrolyze the esculin and turn the tubes black, and therefore did not have to be streaked onto selective plates. However, with raw chicken or beef because of the large number of false-positive FB tubes, almost all tubes had to be streaked onto selective plates and very little advantage was gained from using the FB. the Micro-ID Listeria test kit gave a 100% correlation with conventional biochemical reactions for pure cultures of Listeria isolated from the three categories of meat products in this study. When used in conjunction with hemolysis plates and CAMP reactions, this test identifies species of Listeria isolates within 24 h of visible colony formation.     

免疫磁珠富集技术联合选择性培养基快速检测单增李斯特菌

单增李斯特菌是一种危害极大的食源性致病菌,建立快速及特异的检测方法对于食品安全监控尤为重要。文中联合免疫磁珠与选择性培养基对不同浓度(101~105CFU/mL)单增李斯特菌进行检测,并对3种李斯特菌、金黄色葡萄球菌及副溶血弧菌进行交叉试验;同时模拟食物污染,探索免疫磁珠-平板法检测样品的检测限以及该方法的最快检测时间。结果显示特异性免疫磁珠联合选择性平板法可检出浓度为103CFU/mL及以上的单增李斯特菌;牛奶样品仅需6 h增菌能被检出,检测限为0.7 CFU/mL。联合使用免疫磁珠富集技术与选择性培养基,能在30 h内完成对牛奶样品的检测,较国标法减少38 h以上,且具有同等的灵敏度。