Intramembrane proteolysis and endoplasmic reticulum retention of hepatitis C virus core protein

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein is suggested to localize to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through a C-terminal hydrophobic region that acts as a membrane anchor for core protein and as a signal sequence for E1 protein. The signal sequence of core protein is further processed by signal peptide peptidase (SPP). We examined the regions of core protein responsible for ER retention and processing by SPP. Analysis of the intracellular localization of deletion mutants of HCV core protein revealed that not only the C-terminal signal-anchor sequence but also an upstream hydrophobic region from amino acid 128 to 151 is required for ER retention of core protein. Precise mutation analyses indicated that replacement of Leu(139), Val(140), and Leu(144) of core protein by Ala inhibited processing by SPP, but cleavage at the core-E1 junction by signal peptidase was maintained. Additionally, the processed E1 protein was translocated into the ER and glycosylated with high-mannose oligosaccharides. Core protein derived from the mutants was translocated into the nucleus in spite of the presence of the unprocessed C-terminal signal-anchor sequence. Although the direct association of core protein with a wild-type SPP was not observed, expression of a loss-of-function SPP mutant inhibited cleavage of the signal sequence by SPP and coimmunoprecipitation with unprocessed core protein. These results indicate that Leu(139), Val(140), and Leu(144) in core protein play crucial roles in the ER retention and SPP cleavage of HCV core protein.     

Characterization of the cleavage of signal peptide at the C-terminus of hepatitis C virus core protein by signal peptide peptidase

Production of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein requires the cleavages of polyprotein by signal peptidase and signal peptide peptidase (SPP). Cleavage of signal peptide at the C-terminus of HCV core protein by SPP was characterized in this study. The spko mutant (mutate a.a. 189–193 from ASAYQ to PPFPF) is more efficient than the A/F mutant (mutate a.a 189 and 191 from A to F) in blocking the cleavage of signal peptide by signal peptidase. The cleavage efficiency of SPP is inversely proportional to the length of C-terminal extension of the signal peptide: the longer the extension, the less efficiency the cleavage is. Thus, reducing the length of C-terminal extension of signal peptide by signal peptidase cleavage could facilitate further cleavage by SPP. The recombinant core protein fused with signal peptide from the C-terminus of p7 protein, but not those from the C-termini of E1 and E2, could be cleaved by SPP. Therefore, the sequence of the signal peptide is important but not the sole determinant for its cleavage by SPP. Replacement of the HCV core protein E.R.-associated domain (a.a. 120–150) with the E.R.-associated domain (a.a.1–50) of SARS-CoV membrane protein results in the failure of cleavage of this recombinant protein by SPP, though this protein still is E.R.-associated. This result suggests that not only E.R.-association but also specific protein sequence is important for the HCV core protein signal peptide cleavage by SPP. Thus, our results suggest that both sequences of the signal peptide and the E.R.-associated domain are important for the signal peptide cleavage of HCV core protein by SPP. Electronic Supplementary MaterialThe online version of this article (doi: ) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Internally located cleavable signal sequences direct the formation of Semliki Forest virus membrane proteins from a polyprotein precursor.

The proteolytic processes involved in the cotranslational production of the Semliki Forest virus proteins p62, 6K, and E1 from a common precursor polypeptide were analyzed by an in vitro translation-translocation assay. By studying the behavior of wild-type and mutant variants of the polyprotein, we show that the signal sequences responsible for membrane translocation of the 6K and E1 proteins reside in the C-terminal regions of p62 and 6K, respectively. We present evidence suggesting that the polyprotein is processed on the luminal side by signal peptidase at consensus cleavage sites immediately following the signal sequences. Our results also lead us to conclude that the 6K protein is a transmembrane polypeptide with its N terminus on the luminal side of the membrane (type I). Thus, the production of all three membrane proteins is directed by alternating signal and stop-transfer (anchor) sequences that function in translocation and cleavage of the virus precursor polyprotein. This also shows conclusively that internally located signal sequences can be cleaved by signal peptidase.     

The NS2 protein of hepatitis C virus is a transmembrane polypeptide.

The NS2 protein of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is released from its polyprotein precursor by two proteolytic cleavages. The N terminus of this protein is separated from the E2/p7 polypeptide by a cleavage thought to be mediated by signal peptidase, whereas the NS2-3 junction located at the C terminus is processed by a viral protease. To characterize the biogenesis of NS2 encoded by the BK strain of HCV, we have defined the minimal region of the polyprotein required for efficient cleavage at the NS2-3 site and analyzed the interaction of the mature polypeptide with the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). We have observed that although cleavage can occur in vitro in the absence of microsomal membranes, synthesis of the polyprotein precursor in the presence of membranes greatly increases processing at this site. Furthermore, we show that the membrane dependency for efficient in vitro processing varies among different HCV strains and that host proteins located on the ER membrane, and in particular the signal recognition particle receptor, are required to sustain efficient proteolysis. By means of sedimentation analysis, protease protection assay, and site-directed mutagenesis, we also demonstrate that the NS2 protein derived from processing at the NS2-3 site is a transmembrane polypeptide, with the C terminus translocated in the lumen of the ER and the N terminus located in the cytosol.     

Topological changes in the transmembrane domains of hepatitis C virus envelope glycoproteins

Hepatitis C virus proteins are synthesized as a polyprotein cleaved by a signal peptidase and viral proteases. The behaviour of internal signal sequences at the C-terminus of the transmembrane domains of hepatitis C virus envelope proteins E1 and E2 is essential for the topology of downstream polypeptides. We determined the topology of these transmembrane domains before and after signal sequence cleavage by tagging E1 and E2 with epitopes and by analysing their accessibility in selectively permeabilized cells. We showed that, after cleavage by signal peptidase in the endoplasmic reticulum, the C-terminal orientation of these transmembrane domains changed from luminal to cytosolic. The dynamic behaviour of these transmembrane domains is unique and it is linked to their multifunctionality. By reorienting their C-terminus toward the cytosol and being part of a transmembrane domain, the signal sequences at the C-terminus of E1 and E2 contribute to new functions: (i) membrane anchoring; (ii) E1E2 heterodimerization; and (iii) endoplasmic reticulum retention.     

Targeting of hepatitis C virus core protein to mitochondria through a novel C-terminal localization motif

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein represents the first 191 amino acids of the viral precursor polyprotein and is cotranslationally inserted into the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Processing at position 179 by a recently identified intramembrane signal peptide peptidase leads to the generation and potential cytosolic release of a 179-amino-acid matured form of the core protein. Using confocal microscopy, we observed that a fraction of the mature core protein colocalized with mitochondrial markers in core-expressing HeLa cells and in Huh-7 cells containing the full-length HCV replicon. Subcellular fractionation confirmed this observation and showed that the core protein associates with purified mitochondrial fractions devoid of ER contaminants. The core protein also fractionated with mitochondrion-associated membranes, a site of physical contact between the ER and mitochondria. Using immunoelectron microscopy and in vitro mitochondrial import assays, we showed that the core protein is located on the mitochondrial outer membrane. A stretch of 10 amino acids within the hydrophobic C terminus of the processed core protein conferred mitochondrial localization when it was fused to green fluorescent protein. The location of the core protein in the outer mitochondrial membrane suggests that it could modulate apoptosis or lipid transfer, both of which are associated with this subcellular compartment, during HCV infection.     

Maturation of hepatitis C virus core protein by signal peptide peptidase is required for virus production

Complete maturation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein requires coordinate cleavage by signal peptidase and an intramembrane protease, signal peptide peptidase. We show that reducing the intracellular levels of signal peptide peptidase lowers the titer of infectious virus released from cells, indicating that it plays an important role in virus production. Proteolysis by the enzyme at a signal peptide between core and the E1 glycoprotein is needed to permit targeting of core to lipid droplets. From mutagenesis studies, introducing mutations into the core-E1 signal peptide delayed the appearance of signal peptide peptidase-processed core until between 48 and 72 h after the beginning of the infectious cycle. Accumulation of mature core at these times coincided with its localization to lipid droplets and a rise in titer of infectious HCV. Therefore, processing of core by signal peptide peptidase is a critical event in the virus life cycle. To study the stage in virus production that may be blocked by interfering with intramembrane cleavage of core, we examined the distribution of viral RNA in cells harboring the core-E1 signal peptide mutant. Results revealed that colocalization of core with HCV RNA required processing of the protein by signal peptide peptidase. Our findings provide new insights into the sequence requirements for proteolysis by signal peptide peptidase. Moreover, they offer compelling evidence for a function for an intramembrane protease to facilitate the association of core with viral genomes, thereby creating putative sites for assembly of nascent virus particles.     

Glycosylation of the hepatitis C virus envelope protein E1 is dependent on the presence of a downstream sequence on the viral polyprotein

The addition of N-linked oligosaccharides to Asn-X-(Ser/Thr) sites is catalyzed by the oligosaccharyltransferase, an enzyme closely associated with the translocon and generally thought to have access only to nascent chains as they emerge from the ribosome. However, the presence of the sequon does not automatically ensure core glycosylation because many proteins contain sequons that remain either nonglycosylated or glycosylated to a variable extent. In this study, hepatitis C virus (HCV) envelope protein E1 was used as a model to study the efficiency of N-glycosylation. HCV envelope proteins, E1 and E2, were released from a polyprotein precursor after cleavage by host signal peptidase(s). When expressed alone, E1 was not efficiently glycosylated. However, E1 glycosylation was improved when expressed as a polyprotein including full-length or truncated forms of E2. These data indicate that glycosylation of E1 is dependent on the presence of polypeptide sequences located downstream of E1 on HCV polyprotein.     

Rubella virus E2 signal peptide is required for perinuclear localization of capsid protein and virus assembly

The rubella virus (RV) structural proteins capsid, E2, and E1 are synthesized as a polyprotein precursor. The signal peptide that initiates translocation of E2 into the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum remains attached to the carboxy terminus of the capsid protein after cleavage by signal peptidase. Among togaviruses, this feature is unique to RV. The E2 signal peptide has previously been shown to function as a membrane anchor for the capsid protein. In the present study, we demonstrate that this domain is required for RV glycoprotein-dependent localization of the capsid protein to the juxtanuclear region and subsequent virus assembly at the Golgi complex.     

Signal Peptidase Cleavage at the Flavivirus C-prM Junction: Dependence on the Viral NS2B-3 Protease for Efficient Processing Requires Determinants in C,the Signal Peptide,and prM

Signal peptidase cleavage at the C-prM junction in the flavivirus structural polyprotein is inefficient in the absence of the cytoplasmic viral protease, which catalyzes cleavage at the COOH terminus of the C protein. The signal peptidase cleavage occurs efficiently in circumstances where the C protein is deleted or if the viral protease complex is present. In this study, we used cDNA of Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVE) to examine features of the structural polyprotein which allow this regulation of a luminal cleavage by a cytoplasmic protease. We found that the inefficiency of signal peptidase cleavage in the absence of the viral protease is not attributable solely to features of the C protein. Inhibition of cleavage still occurred when charged residues in C were mutated to uncharged residues or when an unrelated protein sequence (that of ubiquitin) was substituted for C. Also, fusion of the C protein did not inhibit processing of an alternative adjacent signal sequence. The cleavage region of the flavivirus prM translocation signal is unusually hydrophobic, and we established that altering this characteristic by making three point mutations near the signal peptidase cleavage site in MVE prM dramatically increased the extent of cleavage without requiring removal of the C protein. In addition, we demonstrated that luminal sequences downstream from the signal peptidase cleavage site contributed to the inefficiency of cleavage.Polyprotein processing is important in the regulation of gene expression of many plus-strand RNA viruses (16, 19, 29, 41). The production from a polyprotein of precursor and mature proteins, which may have different functional activities, can be quantitatively and temporally modulated (9, 22, 43). This involves predominantly the alteration of cleavage specificities of virus-encoded cytoplasmic proteases. The regulation of a signal peptidase cleavage in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) by a cytoplasmic viral protease has been described for the processing of the structural polyprotein region of several flaviviruses (1, 23, 42). This is intriguing since signal peptidase cleavages are generally assumed to take place rapidly, during protein translocation across the ER membrane (4).Flaviviruses are enveloped, positive-strand RNA viruses. The genome encodes a single polyprotein which is approximately 3,500 amino acids long and traverses the ER membrane multiple times (reviewed in reference 31). This polyprotein is cleaved to produce three structural and seven nonstructural proteins, and all but two of the necessary cleavages are catalyzed by the virus-encoded NS2B-3 protease in the cytoplasm or by signal peptidase at the luminal side of the ER membrane. The flavivirus structural proteins are encoded in the 5′ quarter of the genome. The capsid (C) protein, at the NH₂ terminus of the polyprotein, is separated from the prM (precursor to membrane) protein by a signal sequence directing the translocation of prM. The NS2B-3 protease complex catalyzes cleavage at the COOH terminus of the C protein on the cytoplasmic side of the ER membrane. This is the only site in the structural polyprotein region which is cleaved by this enzyme. The type I transmembrane protein prM is anchored in the lipid bilayer by a COOH-terminal membrane anchor, which is immediately followed by the signal sequence for translocation of the E (envelope) protein, also a type I transmembrane protein. Thus the NH₂ termini of the prM and E proteins are generated by signal peptidase cleavages. However, it has been noted for a number of flaviviruses that when the entire structural polyprotein region is expressed from cDNA, the signal peptidase-mediated cleavage at the NH₂ terminus of prM does not occur efficiently, in contrast to that at the NH₂ terminus of the E protein (23, 33, 36, 42). This inefficient production of prM is reflected in the deficiency of secretion of the prM-E heterodimer and, in turn, the lack of immunogenicity often observed when such constructs are used for vaccination (see, for example, references 10, 11, 18, 30, and 34).Signal peptidase cleavage at the C-prM junction is greatly enhanced in the presence of the viral NS2B-3 protease (1, 23, 42) or when prM is expressed by using constructs which do not include the C protein-coding region (23, 42). Furthermore, cleavage at the NH₂ terminus of prM by signal peptidase can be induced to occur posttranslationally following trypsin cleavage of the cytoplasmic C region of the C-prM precursor in crude microsomes in vitro (36). One of us has proposed that the covalent linkage of C to prM results in the positioning of the signal sequence of prM in the ER membrane such that the signal peptidase cleavage site is maintained in a cryptic conformation (23). In the present study we have investigated elements in the structural polyprotein region of a flavivirus, Murray Valley encephalitis virus (MVE), which allow the control of signal peptidase cleavage of prM by the viral protease.     

Transport of the intracisternal A-type particle Gag polyprotein to the endoplasmic reticulum is mediated by the signal recognition particle

Intracisternal A-type particles (IAP) are defective endogenous retroviruses that accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) of rodent cells. The enveloped particles are produced by assembly and budding of IAP Gag polyproteins at the ER membrane. In this study, we analyzed the specific ER transport of the Gag polyprotein of the IAP element MIA14. To this end, we performed in vitro translation of Gag in the presence of microsomal membranes or synthetic proteoliposomes followed by membrane sedimentation or flotation. ER binding of IAP Gag occurred mostly cotranslationally, and Gag polyproteins interacted specifically with proteoliposomes containing only signal recognition particle (SRP) receptor and the Sec61p complex, which form the minimal ER translocation apparatus. The direct participation of SRP in ER targeting of IAP Gag was demonstrated in cross-linking and immunoprecipitation experiments. The IAP polyprotein was not translocated into the ER; it was found to be tightly associated with the cytoplasmic side of the ER membrane but did not behave as an integral membrane protein. Substituting the functional signal peptide of preprolactin for the hydrophobic sequence at the N terminus of IAP Gag also did not result in translocation of the chimeric protein into the ER lumen, and grafting the IAP hydrophobic sequence onto preprolactin failed to yield luminal transport as well. These results suggest that the N-terminal hydrophobic region of the IAP Gag polyprotein functions as a transport signal which mediates SRP-dependent ER targeting, but polyprotein translocation or integration into the membrane is prevented by the signal sequence itself and by additional regions of Gag.     

A New Type of Signal Peptidase Cleavage Site Identified in an RNA Virus Polyprotein

Pestiviruses, a group of enveloped positive strand RNA viruses belonging to the family Flaviviridae, express their genes via a polyprotein that is subsequently processed by proteases. The structural protein region contains typical signal peptidase cleavage sites. Only the site at the C terminus of the glycoprotein E^rns is different because it does not contain a hydrophobic transmembrane region but an amphipathic helix functioning as the E^rns membrane anchor. Despite the absence of a hydrophobic region, the site between the C terminus of E^rns and E1, the protein located downstream in the polyprotein, is cleaved by signal peptidase, as demonstrated by mutagenesis and inhibitor studies. Thus, E^rnsE1 is processed at a novel type of signal peptidase cleavage site showing a different membrane topology. Prevention of glycosylation or introduction of mutations into the C-terminal region of E^rns severely impairs processing, presumably by preventing proper membrane interaction or disturbing a conformation critical for the protein to be accepted as a substrate by signal peptidase.     

Intramembrane processing by signal peptide peptidase regulates the membrane localization of hepatitis C virus core protein and viral propagation

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) core protein has shown to be localized in the detergent-resistant membrane (DRM), which is distinct from the classical raft fraction including caveolin, although the biological significance of the DRM localization of the core protein has not been determined. The HCV core protein is cleaved off from a precursor polyprotein at the lumen side of Ala(191) by signal peptidase and is then further processed by signal peptide peptidase (SPP) within the transmembrane region. In this study, we examined the role of SPP in the localization of the HCV core protein in the DRM and in viral propagation. The C terminus of the HCV core protein cleaved by SPP in 293T cells was identified as Phe(177) by mass spectrometry. Mutations introduced into two residues (Ile(176) and Phe(177)) upstream of the cleavage site of the core protein abrogated processing by SPP and localization in the DRM fraction. Expression of a dominant-negative SPP or treatment with an SPP inhibitor, L685,458, resulted in reductions in the levels of processed core protein localized in the DRM fraction. The production of HCV RNA in cells persistently infected with strain JFH-1 was impaired by treatment with the SPP inhibitor. Furthermore, mutant JFH-1 viruses bearing SPP-resistant mutations in the core protein failed to propagate in a permissive cell line. These results suggest that intramembrane processing of HCV core protein by SPP is required for the localization of the HCV core protein in the DRM and for viral propagation.     

SPCS1-Dependent E2-p7 processing determines HCV Assembly efficiency

Recent studies identified signal peptidase complex subunit 1 (SPCS1) as a proviral host factor for Flaviviridae viruses, including HCV. One of the SPCS1’s roles in flavivirus propagation was attributed to its regulation of signal peptidase complex (SPC)-mediated processing of flavivirus polyprotein, especially C-prM junction. However, whether SPCS1 also regulates any SPC-mediated processing sites within HCV polyprotein remains unclear. In this study, we determined that loss of SPCS1 specifically impairs the HCV E2-p7 processing by the SPC. We also determined that efficient separation of E2 and p7, regardless of its dependence on SPC-mediated processing, leads to SPCS1 dispensable for HCV assembly These results suggest that SPCS1 regulates HCV assembly by facilitating the SPC-mediated processing of E2-p7 precursor. Structural modeling suggests that intrinsically delayed processing of the E2-p7 is likely caused by the structural rigidity of p7 N-terminal transmembrane helix-1 (p7/TM1/helix-1), which has mostly maintained membrane-embedded conformations during molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. E2-p7-processing-impairing p7 mutations narrowed the p7/TM1/helix-1 bending angle against the membrane, resulting in closer membrane embedment of the p7/TM1/helix-1 and less access of E2-p7 junction substrate to the catalytic site of the SPC, located well above the membrane in the ER lumen. Based on these results we propose that the key mechanism of action of SPCS1 in HCV assembly is to facilitate the E2-p7 processing by enhancing the E2-p7 junction site presentation to the SPC active site. By providing evidence that SPCS1 facilitates HCV assembly by regulating SPC-mediated cleavage of E2-p7 junction, equivalent to the previously established role of this protein in C-prM junction processing in flavivirus, this study establishes the common role of SPCS1 in Flaviviridae family virus propagation as to exquisitely regulate the SPC-mediated processing of specific, suboptimal target sites.     

Requirements for the insertion of the Sindbis envelope glycoproteins into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Previous work has shown that the Sindbis structural proteins, core, the internal protein, and PE2 and E1, the integral membrane glycoproteins are synthesized as a polyprotein from a 26S mRNA; core PE2 and E1 are derived by proteolytic cleavage of a nascent chain. Newly synthesized core protein remains on the cytoplasmic side of the endoplasmic reticulum while newly synthesized PE2 and E1 are inserted into the lipid bilayer, presumably via their amino-termini. PE2 and E1 are glycosylated as nascent chains. Here, we examine a temperature-sensitive mutant of Sindbis virus which fails to cleave the structural proteins, resulting in the production of a polyprotein of 130,000 mol wt in which the amino-termini of PE2 and E1 are internal to the protein. Although the envelope sequences are present in this protein, it is not inserted into the endoplasmic reticulum bilayer, but remains on the cytoplasmic side as does the core protein in cells infected with wild-type Sindbis virus. We have also examined the fate of PE2 and E1 in cells treated with tunicamycin, an inhibitor of glycosylation. Unglycosylated PE2 and E1 are inserted normally into the lipid bilayer as are the glycosylated proteins. These results are consistent with the notion that a specific amino-terminal sequence is required for the proper insertion of membrane proteins into the endoplasmic reticulum bilayer, but that glycosylation is not required for this insertion.     

A tripartite structure of the signals that determine protein insertion into the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Multilineage colony stimulating factor is a secretory protein with a cleavable signal sequence that is unusually long and hydrophobic. Using molecular cloning techniques we exchanged sequences NH2- or COOH-terminally flanking the hydrophobic signal sequence. Such modified fusion proteins still inserted into the membrane but their signal sequence was not cleaved. Instead the proteins were now anchored in the membrane by the formerly cleaved signal sequence (signal-anchor sequence). They exposed the NH2 terminus on the exoplasmic and the COOH terminus on the cytoplasmic side of the membrane. We conclude from our results that hydrophilic sequences flanking the hydrophobic core of a signal sequence can determine cleavage by signal peptidase and insertion into the membrane. It appears that negatively charged amino acid residues close to the NH2 terminal side of the hydrophobic segment are compatible with translocation of this segment across the membrane. A tripartite structure is proposed for signal-anchor sequences: a hydrophobic core region that mediates targeting to and insertion into the ER membrane and flanking hydrophilic segments that determine the orientation of the protein in the membrane.     

The Alphavirus E3 Glycoprotein Functions in a Clade-Specific Manner

The 80 trimeric, glycoprotein spikes that cover the surface of alphavirus particles are required for mediating viral entry into a host cell. Spike assembly is a regulated process that requires interactions between five structural proteins, E3, E2, 6K and its translational frameshift product TF, and E1. E3 is a small, ∼65-amino-acid glycoprotein that has two known functions: E3 serves as the signal sequence for translocation of the E3-E2-6K-E1 polyprotein into the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), and cleavage of E3 from E2 is essential for virus maturation. Nonetheless, when E3 is replaced with an ER signal sequence, spikes do not form and infectious particles are not assembled, suggesting an additional role(s) for E3 in the viral life cycle. To further investigate the role of E3 in spike assembly, we made chimeric viruses in which E3 from one alphavirus species is replaced with E3 from another species. Our results demonstrate that when E3 is interchanged between alphavirus species that belong to the same virus clade, viral titers and particle morphologies and compositions are similar to what are observed for the parental virus. In contrast, for chimeras in which E3 is derived from a different clade than the parental virus, we observed reduced titers and the formation of particles with atypical morphologies and protein compositions. We further characterized the E3 chimeras using a combination of structure-function and revertant analyses. This work revealed two specific interactions between E3 and its cognate E2 glycoprotein that are important for regulating spike assembly.     

Poliovirus/Hepatitis C Virus (Internal Ribosomal Entry Site-Core) Chimeric Viruses: Improved Growth Properties through Modification of a Proteolytic Cleavage Site and Requirement for Core RNA Sequences but Not for Core-Related Polypeptides

H.-H. Lu and E. Wimmer (Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93:1412–1417, 1996) have demonstrated that the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) of poliovirus (PV) can be functionally replaced by the related genetic element from hepatitis C virus (HCV). One important finding of this study was that open reading frame sequences 3′ of the initiating AUG, corresponding to the open reading frame of the HCV core polypeptide, are required to create a viable chimeric virus. This made necessary the inclusion of a PV 3C protease (3C^pro) cleavage site for proper polyprotein processing to create the authentic N terminus of the PV capsid precursor. Chimeric PV/HCV (P/H) viruses, however, grew poorly relative to PV. The goal of this study was to determine the molecular basis of impaired replication and enhance the growth properties of this chimeric virus. Genetic modifications leading to a different proteinase (PV 2A^pro) cleavage site between the HCV core sequence and the PV polyprotein (P/H701-2A) proved far superior with respect to viral protein expression, core-PV fusion polyprotein processing, plaque phenotype, and viral titer than the original prototype PV/HCV chimera containing the PV 3C^pro-specific cleavage site (P/H701). We have used this new virus model to answer two questions concerning the role of the HCV core protein in P/H chimeric viral proliferation. First, a derivative of P/H701-2A with frameshifts in the core-encoding sequence was used to demonstrate that production of the core protein was not necessary for the translation and replication of the P/H chimera. Second, a viral construct with a C-terminal truncation of 23 amino acids of the core gene was used to show that a signal sequence for signal peptidase processing, when present in the viral construct, is detrimental to P/H virus growth. The novel P/H chimera described here are suitable models for analyzing the function(s) of the HCV elements by genetic analyses in vivo and for antiviral drug discovery.