SecA is not required for signal recognition particle-mediated targeting and initial membrane insertion of a nascent inner membrane protein.

In Escherichia coli, signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of inner membrane proteins has been described. In vitro cross-linking studies have demonstrated that short nascent chains exposing a highly hydrophobic targeting signal interact with the SRP. This SRP, assisted by its receptor, FtsY, mediates the transfer to a common translocation site in the inner membrane that contains SecA, SecG, and SecY. Here we describe a further in vitro reconstitution of SRP-mediated membrane insertion in which purified ribosome-nascent chain-SRP complexes are targeted to the purified SecYEG complex contained in proteoliposomes in a process that requires the SRP-receptor FtsY and GTP. We found that in this system SecA and ATP are dispensable for both the transfer of the nascent inner membrane protein FtsQ to SecY and its stable membrane insertion. Release of the SRP from nascent FtsQ also occurred in the absence of SecYEG complex indicating a functional interaction of FtsY with lipids. These data suggest that SRP/FtsY and SecB/SecA constitute distinct targeting routes.     

SecA-mediated targeting and translocation of secretory proteins

More than 30 years of research have revealed that the dynamic nanomotor SecA is a central player in bacterial protein secretion. SecA associates with the SecYEG channel and transports polypeptides post-translationally to the trans side of the cytoplasmic membrane. It comprises a helicase-like ATPase core coupled to two domains that provide specificity for preprotein translocation. Apart from SecYEG, SecA associates with multiple ligands like ribosomes, nucleotides, lipids, chaperones and preproteins. It exerts its essential contribution in two phases. First, SecA, alone or in concert with chaperones, helps mediate the targeting of the secretory proteins from the ribosome to the membrane. Next, at the membrane it converts chemical energy to mechanical work and translocates preproteins through the SecYEG channel. SecA is a highly dynamic enzyme, it exploits disorder–order kinetics, swiveling and dissociation of domains and dimer to monomer transformations that are tightly coupled with its catalytic function. Preprotein signal sequences and mature domains exploit these dynamics to manipulate the nanomotor and thus achieve their export at the expense of metabolic energy. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Protein trafficking and secretion in bacteria. Guest Editors: Anastassios Economou and Ross Dalbey.     

YidC, the Escherichia coli homologue of mitochondrial Oxa1p, is a component of the Sec translocase

In Escherichia coli, both secretory and inner membrane proteins initially are targeted to the core SecYEG inner membrane translocase. Previous work has also identified the peripherally associated SecA protein as well as the SecD, SecF and YajC inner membrane proteins as components of the translocase. Here, we use a cross-linking approach to show that hydrophilic portions of a co-translationally targeted inner membrane protein (FtsQ) are close to SecA and SecY, suggesting that insertion takes place at the SecA/Y interface. The hydrophobic FtsQ signal anchor sequence contacts both lipids and a novel 60 kDa translocase-associated component that we identify as YidC. YidC is homologous to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Oxa1p, which has been shown to function in a novel export pathway at the mitochondrial inner membrane. We propose that YidC is involved in the insertion of hydrophobic sequences into the lipid bilayer after initial recognition by the SecAYEG translocase.     

Determination of the Oligomeric State of SecYEG Protein Secretion Channel Complex Using in Vivo Photo- and Disulfide Cross-linking

SecYEG protein of bacteria or Sec61αβγ of eukaryotes is a universally conserved heterotrimeric protein channel complex that accommodates the partitioning of membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer as well as the secretion of proteins to the trans side of the plasma or endoplasmic reticular membrane, respectively. SecYEG function is facilitated by cytosolic partners, mainly a nascent chain-ribosome complex or the SecA ATPase motor protein. Extensive efforts utilizing both biochemical and biophysical approaches have been made to determine whether SecYEG functions as a monomer or a dimer, but such approaches have often generated conflicting results. Here we have employed site-specific in vivo photo-cross-linking or cysteine cross-linking, along with co-immunoprecipitation or SecA footprinting techniques to readdress this issue. Our findings show that the SecY dimer to monomer ratio is relatively constant regardless of whether translocons are actively engaged with protein substrate or not. Under the former conditions the SecY dimer can be captured associated with a translocon-jammed substrate, indicative of SecY dimer function. Furthermore, SecA ATPase can be cross-linked to two copies of SecY when the complex contains a translocation intermediate. Collectively, our results suggest that SecYEG dimers are functional units of the translocon.     

The Escherichia coli SRP and SecB targeting pathways converge at the translocon.

Two distinct protein targeting pathways can direct proteins to the Escherichia coli inner membrane. The Sec pathway involves the cytosolic chaperone SecB that binds to the mature region of pre-proteins. SecB targets the pre-protein to SecA that mediates pre-protein translocation through the SecYEG translocon. The SRP pathway is probably used primarily for the targeting and assembly of inner membrane proteins. It involves the signal recognition particle (SRP) that interacts with the hydrophobic targeting signal of nascent proteins. By using a protein cross-linking approach, we demonstrate here that the SRP pathway delivers nascent inner membrane proteins at the membrane. The SRP receptor FtsY, GTP and inner membranes are required for release of the nascent proteins from the SRP. Upon release of the SRP at the membrane, the targeted nascent proteins insert into a translocon that contains at least SecA, SecY and SecG. Hence, as appears to be the case for several other translocation systems, multiple targeting mechanisms deliver a variety of precursor proteins to a common membrane translocation complex of the E.coli inner membrane.     

Penetration into membrane of amino‐terminal region of SecA when associated with SecYEG in active complexes

The general secretory (Sec) system of Escherichia coli translocates both periplasmic and outer membrane proteins through the cytoplasmic membrane. The pathway through the membrane is provided by a highly conserved translocon, which in E. coli comprises two heterotrimeric integral membrane complexes, SecY, SecE, and SecG (SecYEG), and SecD, SecF, and YajC (SecDF/YajC). SecA is an associated ATPase that is essential to the function of the Sec system. SecA plays two roles, it targets precursors to the translocon with the help of SecB and it provides energy via hydrolysis of ATP. SecA exists both free in the cytoplasm and integrally membrane associated. Here we describe details of association of the amino‐terminal region of SecA with membrane. We use site‐directed spin labelling and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy to show that when SecA is co‐assembled into lipids with SecYEG to yield highly active translocons, the N‐terminal region of SecA penetrates the membrane and lies at the interface between the polar and the hydrophobic regions, parallel to the plane of the membrane at a depth of approximately 5 Å. When SecA is bound to SecYEG, preassembled into proteoliposomes, or nonspecifically bound to lipids in the absence of SecYEG, the N‐terminal region penetrates more deeply (8 Å). Implications of partitioning of the SecA N‐terminal region into lipids on the complex between SecB carrying a precursor and SecA are discussed.     

Energetics of SecA dimerization

Transport of many proteins to extracytoplasmic locations occurs via the general secretion (Sec) pathway. In Escherichia coli, this pathway is composed of the SecYEG protein-conducting channel and the SecA ATPase. SecA plays a central role in binding the signal peptide region of preproteins, directing preproteins to membrane-bound SecYEG and promoting translocation coupled with ATP hydrolysis. Although it is well established that SecA is crucial for preprotein transport and thus cell viability, its oligomeric state during different stages of transport remains ill defined. We have characterized the energetics of SecA dimerization as a function of salt concentration and temperature and defined the linkage of SecA dimerization and signal peptide binding using analytical ultracentrifugation. The use of a new fluorescence detector permitted an analysis of SecA dimerization down to concentrations as low as 50 nM. The dimer dissociation constants are strongly dependent on salt. Linkage analysis indicates that SecA dimerization is coupled to the release of about five ions, demonstrating that electrostatic interactions play an important role in stabilizing the SecA dimer interface. Binding of signal peptide reduces SecA dimerization affinity, such that K_d increases about 9-fold from 0.28 μM in the absence of peptide to 2.68 μM in the presence of peptide. The weakening of the SecA dimer that accompanies signal peptide binding may poise the SecA dimer to dissociate upon binding to SecYEG.     

Signal Recognition Particle and SecA Cooperate during Export of Secretory Proteins with Highly Hydrophobic Signal Sequences

The Sec translocon of bacterial plasma membranes mediates the linear translocation of secretory proteins as well as the lateral integration of membrane proteins. Integration of many membrane proteins occurs co-translationally via the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of ribosome-associated nascent chains to the Sec translocon. In contrast, translocation of classical secretory proteins across the Sec translocon is a post-translational event requiring no SRP but the motor protein SecA. Secretory proteins were, however, reported to utilize SRP in addition to SecA, if the hydrophobicity of their signal sequences exceeds a certain threshold value. Here we have analyzed transport of this subgroup of secretory proteins across the Sec translocon employing an entirely defined in vitro system. We thus found SecA to be both necessary and sufficient for translocation of secretory proteins with hydrophobic signal sequences, whereas SRP and its receptor improved translocation efficiency. This SRP-mediated boost of translocation is likely due to the early capture of the hydrophobic signal sequence by SRP as revealed by site-specific photo cross-linking of ribosome nascent chain complexes.     

Sec-dependent membrane protein biogenesis: SecYEG, preprotein hydrophobicity and translocation kinetics control the stop-transfer function.

Preprotein translocase catalyzes membrane protein integration as well as complete translocation. Membrane proteins must interrupt their translocation and be laterally released from the translocase into the lipid bilayer. We have analyzed the translocation arrest and lateral release activities of Escherichia coli preprotein translocase with an in vitro reaction and the preprotein proOmpA carrying a synthetic stop-transfer sequence. Membrane protein integration is catalytic, occurs with kinetics similar to those of proOmpA itself and only requires the functions of SecYEG and SecA. Though a strongly hydrophobic segment will direct the protein to leave the translocase and enter the lipid bilayer, a protein with a segment of intermediate hydrophobicity partitions equally between the translocated and membrane-integrated states. Analysis of the effects of PMF, varied ATP concentrations or synthetic translocation arrest show that the stop-translocation efficiency of a mildly hydrophobic segment depends on the translocation kinetics. In contrast, the lateral partitioning from translocase to lipids depends solely on temperature and does not require SecA ATP hydrolysis or SecA membrane cycling. Thus translocation arrest is controlled by the SecYEG translocase activity while lateral release and membrane integration are directed by the hydrophobicity of the segment itself. Our results suggest that a greater hydrophobicity is required for efficient translocation arrest than for lateral release into the membrane.     

SecYEG proteoliposomes catalyze the Deltaphi-dependent membrane insertion of FtsQ

In Escherichia coli, the insertion of most inner membrane proteins is mediated by the Sec translocase. Ribosome-bound nascent chains of Sec-dependent inner membrane proteins are targeted to the SecYEG complex via the signal recognition particle pathway. We now demonstrate that the signal recognition particle-dependent co-translational membrane targeting and membrane insertion of FtsQ can be reconstituted with proteoliposomes containing purified SecYEG. SecA and a transmembrane electrical potential are essential for the translocation of the large periplasmic domain of FtsQ, whereas co-reconstituted YidC has an inhibitory effect. These data demonstrate that membrane protein insertion can be reconstituted with a minimal set of purified Sec components.     

In Vitro Interaction of the Housekeeping SecA1 with the Accessory SecA2 Protein of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The majority of proteins that are secreted across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane leave the cell via the Sec pathway, which in its minimal form consists of the dimeric ATP-driven motor protein SecA that associates with the protein-conducting membrane pore SecYEG. Some Gram-positive bacteria contain two homologues of SecA, termed SecA1 and SecA2. SecA1 is the essential housekeeping protein, whereas SecA2 is not essential but is involved in the translocation of a subset of proteins, including various virulence factors. Some SecA2 containing bacteria also harbor a homologous SecY2 protein that may form a separate translocase. Interestingly, mycobacteria contain only one SecY protein and thus both SecA1 and SecA2 are required to interact with SecYEG, either individually or together as a heterodimer. In order to address whether SecA1 and SecA2 cooperate during secretion of SecA2 dependent proteins, we examined the oligomeric state of SecA1 and SecA2 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and their interactions with SecA2 and the cognate SecA1, respectively. We conclude that both SecA1 and SecA2 individually form homodimers in solution but when both proteins are present simultaneously, they form dissociable heterodimers.     

Dynamic Interaction of the Sec Translocon with the Chaperone PpiD

The Sec translocon constitutes a ubiquitous protein transport channel that consists in bacteria of the three core components: SecY, SecE, and SecG. Additional proteins interact with SecYEG during different stages of protein transport. During targeting, SecYEG interacts with SecA, the SRP receptor, or the ribosome. Protein transport into or across the membrane is then facilitated by the interaction of SecYEG with YidC and the SecDFYajC complex. During protein transport, SecYEG is likely to interact also with the protein quality control machinery, but details about this interaction are missing. By in vivo and in vitro site-directed cross-linking, we show here that the periplasmic chaperone PpiD is located in front of the lateral gate of SecY, through which transmembrane domains exit the SecY channel. The strongest contacts were found to helix 2b of SecY. Blue native PAGE analyses verify the presence of a SecYEG-PpiD complex in native Escherichia coli membranes. The PpiD-SecY interaction was not influenced by the addition of SecA and only weakly influenced by binding of nontranslating ribosomes to SecYEG. In contrast, PpiD lost contact to the lateral gate of SecY during membrane protein insertion. These data identify PpiD as an additional and transient subunit of the bacterial SecYEG translocon. The data furthermore demonstrate the highly modular and versatile composition of the Sec translocon, which is probably essential for its ability to transport a wide range of substrates across membranes in bacteria and eukaryotes.     

Charge Composition Features of Model Single-span Membrane Proteins That Determine Selection of YidC and SecYEG Translocase Pathways in Escherichia coli

We have investigated the features of single-span model membrane proteins based upon leader peptidase that determines whether the proteins insert by a YidC/Sec-independent, YidC-only, or YidC/Sec mechanism. We find that a protein with a highly hydrophobic transmembrane segment that inserts into the membrane by a YidC/Sec-independent mechanism becomes YidC-dependent if negatively charged residues are inserted into the translocated periplasmic domain or if the hydrophobicity of the transmembrane segment is reduced by substituting polar residues for nonpolar ones. This suggests that charged residues in the translocated domain and the hydrophobicity within the transmembrane segment are important determinants of the insertion pathway. Strikingly, the addition of a positively charged residue to either the translocated region or the transmembrane region can switch the insertion requirements such that insertion requires both YidC and SecYEG. To test conclusions from the model protein studies, we confirmed that a positively charged residue is a SecYEG determinant for the endogenous proteins ATP synthase subunits a and b and the TatC subunit of the Tat translocase. These findings provide deeper insights into how pathways are selected for the insertion of proteins into the Escherichia coli inner membrane.     

The Lateral Gate of SecYEG Opens during Protein Translocation

The SecYEG translocon of Escherichia coli mediates the translocation of preproteins across the cytoplasmic membrane. Here, we have examined the role of the proposed lateral gate of the translocon in translocation. A dual cysteine cross-linking approach allowed the introduction of cross-linker arms of various lengths between adjoining aminoacyl positions of transmembrane segments 2b and 7 of the lateral gate. Oxidation and short spacer linkers that fix the gate in the closed state abolished preprotein translocation, whereas long spacer linkers support translocation. The cross-linking data further suggests that SecYEG lateral gate opening and activation of the SecA ATPase are coupled processes. It is concluded that lateral gate opening is a critical step during SecA-dependent protein translocation.Translocation of preproteins across the cytoplasmic membrane in Escherichia coli is mediated by the Sec translocase (for a recent review see Ref. 1). Preproteins targeted for secretion contain a signal sequence that is removed upon translocation. Their synthesis and translocation are uncoupled events (2), and directly after synthesis at the ribosomes, preproteins are targeted post-translationally to the Sec translocase by the molecular chaperone SecB (3). SecB transfers the preprotein to the motor protein SecA bound at the SecYEG pore complex (4, 5). SecA utilizes cycles of ATP binding and hydrolysis to bind and release the translocating protein resulting in its stepwise translocation across the membrane (6–8). In addition, the proton motive force facilitates translocation when the preprotein is released by SecA (6, 9). Various models for SecA-mediated translocation have been proposed wherein SecA functions as a power-stroke device (10) or as a directed molecular ratchet wherein SecA controls the opening and closure of the pore (11). Another view is that SecA thrusts deep into the SecYEG channel during translocation (12, 13). In a recent study on the co-crystallization of the Thermotoga maritima SecA with SecYEG, it was suggested that a two-helix finger from the helical scaffold domain of SecA inserts into the cytoplasmic domain of SecY, utilizing cycles of ATP hydrolysis to push the substrate into the SecY pore (14).The translocation pore consists of three integral membrane proteins SecY, SecE, and SecG as subunits (15), and this organization is universally conserved in all three kingdoms of life (16). The crystal structure of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii (17) demonstrates that the largest subunit, SecY, consists of an N- and C-terminal domain that comprise TMs3 1–5 and 6–10, respectively. These two domains are organized as a clamshell-like structure that encompass an hourglass-shaped central pore. This putative pore is closed at the periplasmic face of the membrane by a short transmembrane helix, TM2a, which has been proposed to function as a plug domain. The clamshell-like structure of SecY is embraced by SecE that in its minimal form consists of a surface-localized amphiphatic helix and a highly tilted transmembrane segment that localizes to the “back” of the SecY protein. It has been proposed that the “front” of SecY creates a lateral opening of the central pore to the membrane between TM2b and TM7 and that this gate is used to release signal sequences and transmembrane segments from the translocase (17). Cryoelectron microscopy of the E. coli SecYEG complex bound to a translating ribosome (18) suggests that the ribosome-bound SecYEG is organized as a dimer with a front-to-front organization (18). It was proposed that individual pores of the dimer have distinct functions in protein translocation, i.e. vectorial protein translocation and lateral release of TMs into the membrane (19). Freeze-fracture rotational shadowing electron microscopy has provided evidence for oligomeric forms of SecYEG, and suggest that SecA recruits SecYEG monomers to form a dimeric complex (20). Within this dimeric SecYEG complex, only a single pore seems sufficient for the translocation of preproteins (10).The mechanism by which the translocase coordinates protein translocation is only poorly understood. SecA has been proposed to insert the signal sequence into the SecYEG pore where it may latch between TM2b and TM7 of the SecY lateral gate. This would result in a widening of the central pore constriction and a subsequent displacement of the periplasmic plug domain. Next, adjoining polypeptide segments of the preprotein may enter the opened aqueous pore, but it is not clear if under those conditions the lateral gate remains open or is closed. Despite this vast amount of experimental data available on the function of the SecYEG complex, the exact role of the putative lateral gate remains unknown. Thus far, the only study on its dynamics and role during translocation concerns a molecular dynamics simulation (21) that does not take SecA or ribosome binding into account. Here we have investigated the function and the dynamics of the proposed lateral gate located between TM2b and TM7 in protein translocation. The data demonstrates that the lateral gate needs to open to allow for SecA-mediated preprotein translocation.     

Topology of the SecA ATPase Bound to Large Unilamellar Vesicles

The soluble cytoplasmic ATPase motor protein SecA powers protein transport across the Escherichia coli inner membrane via the SecYEG translocon. Although dimeric in solution, SecA associates monomerically with SecYEG during secretion according to several crystallographic and cryo-EM structural studies. The steps SecA follows from its dimeric cytoplasmic state to its active SecYEG monomeric state are largely unknown. We have previously shown that dimeric SecA in solution dissociates into monomers upon electrostatic binding to negatively charged lipid vesicles formed from E. coli lipids. Here we address the question of the disposition of SecA on the membrane prior to binding to membrane embedded SecYEG. We mutated to cysteine, one at a time, 25 surface-exposed residues of a Cys-free SecA. To each of these we covalently linked the polarity-sensitive fluorophore NBD whose intensity and fluorescence wavelength-shift change upon vesicle binding report on the the local membrane polarity. We established from these measurements the disposition of SecA bound to the membrane in the absence of SecYEG. Our results confirmed that SecA is anchored in the membrane interface primarily by the positive charges of the N terminus domain. But we found that a region of the nucleotide binding domain II is also important for binding. Both domains are rich in positively charged residues, consistent with electrostatic interactions playing the major role in membrane binding. Selective replacement of positively charged residues in these domains with alanine resulted in weaker binding to the membrane, which allowed us to quantitate the relative importance of the domains in stabilizing SecA on membranes. Fluorescence quenchers inside the vesicles had little effect on NBD fluorescence, indicating that SecA does not penetrate significantly across the membrane. Overall, the topology of SecA on the membrane is consistent with the conformation of SecA observed in crystallographic and cryo-EM structures of SecA-SecYEG complexes, suggesting that SecA can switch between the membrane-associated and the translocon-associated states without significant changes in conformation.     

The bacterial protein-translocation complex: SecYEG dimers associate with one or two SecA molecules

In bacteria, the Sec-protein transport complex facilitates the passage of most secretory and membrane proteins across and into the plasma membrane. The core complex SecYEG forms the protein channel and engages either ribosomes or the ATPase SecA, which drive translocation of unfolded polypeptide chains through the complex and into the periplasmic space. Escherichia coli SecYEG forms dimers in membranes, but in detergent solution the population of these dimers is low. However, we find that stable dimers can be assembled by the addition of a monoclonal antibody. Normally, a stable SecYEG-SecA complex can only form on isolated membranes or on reconstituted proteo-liposomes. The antibody-stabilised SecYEG dimer binds one SecA molecule in detergent solution. In the presence of AMPPNP, a non-hydrolysable analogue of ATP, a complex forms containing one antibody and two each of SecYEG and SecA. SecYEG monomers or tetramers do not associate to a significant degree with SecA. The observed variability in the stoichiometry of SecYEG and SecA association and its nucleotide modulation may be important and necessary for the protein translocation reaction.     

Cryo-electron Microscopic Structure of SecA Protein Bound to the 70S Ribosome

SecA is an ATP-dependent molecular motor pumping secretory and outer membrane proteins across the cytoplasmic membrane in bacteria. SecA associates with the protein-conducting channel, the heterotrimeric SecYEG complex, in a so-called posttranslational manner. A recent study further showed binding of a monomeric state of SecA to the ribosome. However, the true oligomeric state of SecA remains controversial because SecA can also form functional dimers, and high-resolution crystal structures exist for both the monomer and the dimer. Here we present the cryo-electron microscopy structures of Escherichia coli SecA bound to the ribosome. We show that not only a monomeric SecA binds to the ribosome but also that two copies of SecA can be observed that form an elongated dimer. Two copies of SecA completely surround the tunnel exit, providing a unique environment to the nascent polypeptides emerging from the ribosome. We identified the N-terminal helix of SecA required for a stable association with the ribosome. The structures indicate a possible function of the dimeric form of SecA at the ribosome.     

Demonstration of a specific Escherichia coli SecY-signal peptide interaction

Protein translocation in Escherichia coli is initiated by the interaction of a preprotein with the membrane translocase composed of a motor protein, SecA ATPase, and a membrane-embedded channel, the SecYEG complex. The extent to which the signal peptide region of the preprotein plays a role in SecYEG interactions is unclear, in part because studies in this area typically employ the entire preprotein. Using a synthetic signal peptide harboring a photoaffinity label in its hydrophobic core, we examined this interaction with SecYEG in a detergent micellar environment. The signal peptide was found to specifically bind SecY in a saturable manner and at levels comparable to those that stimulate SecA ATPase activity. Chemical and proteolytic cleavage of cross-linked SecY and analysis of the signal peptide adducts indicate that the binding was primarily to regions of the protein containing transmembrane domains seven and two. The signal peptide-SecY interaction was affected by the presence of SecA and nucleotides in a manner consistent with the transfer of signal peptide to SecY upon nucleotide hydrolysis at SecA.     

Dissociation of the dimeric SecA ATPase during protein translocation across the bacterial membrane

The ATPase SecA mediates post-translational translocation of precursor proteins through the SecYEG channel of the bacterial inner membrane. We show that SecA, up to now considered to be a stable dimer, is actually in equilibrium with a small fraction of monomers. In the presence of membranes containing acidic phospholipids or in certain detergents, SecA completely dissociates into monomers. A synthetic signal peptide also affects dissociation into monomers. In addition, conversion into the monomeric state can be achieved by mutating a small number of residues in a dimeric and fully functional SecA fragment. This monomeric SecA fragment still maintains strong binding to SecYEG in the membrane as well as significant in vitro translocation activity. Together, the data suggest that the SecA dimer dissociates during protein translocation. Since SecA contains all characteristic motifs of a certain class of monomeric helicases, and since mutations in residues shared with the helicases abolish its translocation activity, SecA may function in a similar manner.     

Escherichia coli Membranes Depleted of SecYEG Elicit SecA-Dependent Ion-Channel Activity but Lose Signal Peptide Specificity

We have developed a sensitive method to detect the opening of SecA-dependent, protein-conducting channels in Xenopus oocytes. In this study, we determined the ionic current activities of the SecA-dependent channel from membrane vesicles depleted of SecYEG. We found that these SecYEG-depleted membranes produced SecA-dependent ionic currents in the oocytes, as did membranes containing SecYEG. However, reconstituted membranes depleted of SecYEG required higher concentrations of SecA to elicit ionic currents like those in membranes containing SecYEG. In contrast to membranes containing SecYEG, the proofreading capacity of signal peptides was lost for those membranes lacking SecYEG. These findings are consistent with loss of signal peptide specificity in channel activity from membranes of SecY suppressor or SecY plug domain mutants. The signal peptide specificity of the reconstituted membranes, like SecA-liposomes, can be restored by the addition of SecYEG proteoliposomes. On the other hand, the channel activity efficiency of reconstituted membranes was fully restored, while SecA-liposomes could only be partially enhanced by the addition of SecYEG, indicating that, in addition to SecYEG, other membrane proteins contribute to the efficiency of channel activity. The SecA-dependent channels in membranes that lacked SecYEG also lost ion selectivity to monovalent cations but retained selective permeability to large anions. Thus, the electrophysiological evidence presented here indicates that SecYEG is not obligatory for the channel activity of Escherichia coli membranes, as previously shown for protein translocation, and that SecYEG is important for maintenance of the efficiency and specificity of SecA-dependent channels.