Anticoagulation in large-volume leukapheresis: comparison between citrate- versus heparin-based anticoagulation on safety and CD34 (+) cell collection efficiency

Background aimsLittle is known of the effect of anticoagulation on peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest during large-volume leukapheresis (LVL). Because of the interaction of heparin with stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1α, it has been proposed that a heparin-based anticoagulation may result in an increased PBPC collection efficiency compared with standard citrate-based anticoagulation.MethodsWe conducted a prospective randomized trial to address the effect of both anticoagulation regimes on safety, subjective comfort and CD34 ⁺ collection efficiency in 90 adult patients undergoing standardized LVL. Anticoagulation consisted of either citrate (group C) or a combination of heparin and low-dose citrate (group H).ResultsThe overall incidence of adverse reactions (AR) during LVL was 17%. AR consisted only of citrate-related AR; no bleeding complications were observed. Determination of parameters of the acid–base balance revealed a higher frequency of metabolic alkalosis in group C. Analysis of serum SDF-1α revealed no differences in SDF-1α plasma levels. There were no differences in the CD34 ⁺ cell collection efficiency, resulting in the harvest of equal CD34 ⁺ cell yields independent of the anticoagulation used.ConclusionsOur data show no clinical relevant effect of a heparin containing anticoagulation in terms of an increased overall CD34 ⁺ cell collection during LVL, although this regime shows some benefits in terms of the incidence and subjective tolerance towards AR. Based on our results the decision between a citrate- and heparin-substituted anticoagulation for LVL should be driven by patient-related factors, and should concern potential contraindications of both methods.     

The use of plerixafor in hematopoietic progenitor cell collection in pediatric patients: a single center experience

Background aimsPlerixafor was recently approved for use in combination with granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for hematopoietic progenitor cell (HPC) collection by apheresis in adults with multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). However, its efficacy in pediatric patients is not well-studied; thus, we report on our institutional experience with this population. Methods. A retrospective observational analysis was performed using both stem cell-processing laboratory information as well as apheresis charts and medical records on all pediatric patients who received plerixafor as part of the mobilization regimen between December 2006 and December 2010. The primary outcome was collection yield. Secondary outcomes included the ability to undergo autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and engraftment status. Results. Eighteen HPC collections by apheresis representing seven mobilization courses were performed on five pediatric patients with poor mobilization status (three males, two females; median age 14 years). Median pre-harvest peripheral blood CD34⁺ cell (PB CD34⁺) count was 6.88/μL. A strong correlation between pre-harvest PB CD34⁺ count and collection yield was observed. Median total collection yield was 2.26 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg. Four patients achieved a minimum collection of 2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg. Three patients underwent auto-HSCT with a median neutrophil and platelet engraftment of 12 and 34 days, respectively. No major adverse events with plerixafor administration or apheresis collections were reported. Conclusions. Plerixafor in combination with G-CSF is a safe and potentially helpful mobilization agent in poor mobilizers. Further studies should be done to evaluate the true efficacy of plerixafor in the pediatric population.     

Feasibility and cost analysis of day 4 granulocyte colony-stimulating factor mobilized peripheral blood progenitor cell collection from HLA-matched sibling donors

BackgroundGuidelines recommend treatment with 4–5 days of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for optimal donor peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) mobilization followed by day 5 collection. Given that some autologous transplant recipients achieve adequate collection by day 4 and the possibility that some allogeneic donors may maximally mobilize PBPC before day 5, a feasibility study was performed evaluating day 4 allogeneic PBPC collection.MethodsHLA-matched sibling donors underwent collection on day 4 of G-CSF for peripheral blood (PB) CD34⁺ counts ≥0.04 × 10⁶/mL, otherwise they underwent collection on day 5. Those with inadequate collected CD34⁺ cells/kg recipient weight underwent repeat collection over 2 days. Transplant and PBPC characteristics and cost analysis were compared with a historical cohort collected on day 5 per our prior institutional algorithm.ResultsOf the 101 patient/donor pairs, 50 (49.5%) had adequate PBPC collection on day 4, with a median PB CD34⁺ cell count of 0.06 × 10⁶/mL. Day 4 donors were more likely to develop bone pain and require analgesics. Median collected CD34⁺ count was significantly greater, whereas total nucleated, mononuclear and CD3⁺ cell counts were significantly lower, at time of transplant infusion for day 4 versus other collection cohorts. There were no significant differences in engraftment or graft-versus-host disease. Cost analysis revealed 6.7% direct cost savings for day 4 versus historical day 5 collection.DiscussionDay 4 PB CD34⁺ threshold of ≥0.04 × 10⁶/mL identified donors with high likelihood of adequate PBPC collection. Day 4 may be the optimal day of collection for healthy donors, without adverse effect on recipient transplant outcomes and with expected cost savings.     

Development of a quantitative prediction model for peripheral blood stem cell collection yield in the plerixafor era

Background aimsPredicting autologous peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection yield before leukapheresis is important for optimizing PBSC mobilization and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for treating hematological malignancies. Although guidelines for plerixafor usage based on peripheral blood CD34⁺ (PB-CD34⁺) cell count are available, their predictive performance in the real world remains unclear.MethodsThis study retrospectively analyzed 55 mobilization procedures for patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma or multiple myeloma and developed a novel quantitative prediction model for CD34⁺ cell collection yield that incorporated four clinical parameters available the day before leukapheresis; namely, PB-CD34⁺ cell count the day before apheresis (day ?1 PB-CD34⁺), number of prior chemotherapy regimens, disease status at apheresis and mobilization protocol.ResultsThe effects of PB-CD34⁺ cell counts on CD34⁺ cell collection yield varied widely per patient characteristics, and plerixafor usage was recommended in patients with poorly controlled disease or those with a history of heavy pre-treatments even with abundant day ?1 PB-CD34⁺ cell count. This model suggested a more proactive use of plerixafor than that recommended by the guidelines for patients with poor pre-collection condition or those with a higher target number of CD34⁺ cells. Further, the authors analyzed the clinical outcomes of ASCT and found that plerixafor use for stem cell mobilization did not affect short- or long-term outcomes after ASCT.ConclusionsAlthough external validations are necessary, the results can be beneficial for establishing more effective and safer mobilization strategies.     

Low baseline platelet count predicts poor response to plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous stem cell mobilization

Background aimsBaseline platelet count has been shown to be a sensitive predictor of autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell collection yield in patients with multiple myeloma mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Patients who mobilize poorly with G-CSF are often treated with plerixafor to enhance mobilization. There are no surrogate markers available to predict response to plerixafor.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data from 73 patients with multiple myeloma who did not have adequate mobilization with G-CSF alone and were treated with plerixafor as a rescue agent.ResultsWe found that baseline platelet count directly correlated with peripheral blood CD34⁺ (PB-CD34⁺) count after plerixafor treatment (r = 0.36, P < 0.0001) and the number of PB-CD34⁺ cells collected on the first day of apheresis and inversely correlated with the number of apheresis sessions needed to collect the target number of PB-CD34⁺ cells (P = 0.0015). Baseline platelet count of 153 000/µL or less was associated with 90% specificity of predicting poor response to plerixafor with a sensitivity of 33%.ConclusionsBaseline platelet count is a good predictor of mobilization response to plerixafor in patients with multiple myeloma.     

Influence of related donor age on outcomes after peripheral blood stem cell transplantation

Background aimsThe rising use of allogeneic transplantation in older recipients necessitates considering older related donors. The effect of related donor age for peripheral blood stem cell allografts (PBSC) on graft maintenance and outcomes, independent of CD34⁺cell dose, has not been well-characterized.MethodsHLA-related donors (98% siblings) underwent a uniform filgrastim-based mobilization regimen aiming to collect and infuse 5 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/recipient kg. Donor and recipient age were modeled in multiple ways to account for the correlation, and outcomes reported by decade of donor age.ResultsThe median donor and recipient ages were 52 years and 54 years, respectively. The mean CD34⁺ cell dose infused was 5.6 × 10⁶ CD34⁺/kg and 75% of patients received a narrow range between 4.4 and 6.6 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg. Neither better PBSC mobilization nor higher CD34⁺ content of allografts was significantly associated with engraftment or transplant outcomes. After adjusting for recipient age and other prognostic factors, older donor age by decade conferred a lower risk of non-relapse mortality (NRM) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.45–0.91, P = 0.013] and borderline improvement in overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.58–0.99, P = 0.045) without altering progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.66–1.07, P = 0.18).ConclusionsOlder donor age does not worsen outcome after matched related donor PBSC transplantation in patients receiving a narrow range CD34⁺ cells. The relatively small sample size mandates that the finding of similar to improved outcomes for older related donor age must be confirmed in larger studies.     

Higher efficacy of Etoposide + Cytarabine Plus Pegfilgrastim in poorly mobilizing Multiple Myeloma and lymphoma Patients

Background aimsAn optimal strategy for mobilizing hematopoietic stem cells in poorly mobilizing patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma has not yet been determined.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of etoposide combined with cytarabine (etoposide 75 mg/m², daily d1∼2; Ara-C 300 mg/m², every 12 h d1∼2), plus pegfilgrastim (6 mg d6) in 32 patients with MM or lymphoma, among whom 53.1% were defined as “proven poor mobilizers.”ResultsThis approach resulted in adequate mobilization (≥2.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg) in 93.8% of patients and optimal mobilization (≥5.0 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg) in 71.9% of patients. A total of 100% of patients with MM reached at least 5 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg collected, the amount required for double autologous stem cell transplant. In total, 88.2% of patients with lymphoma reached at least 2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg collected, the amount required for a single autologous stem cell transplant. This was achieved with a single leukapheresis in 78.1% of cases. A median peak number of 42.0/μL circulating CD34⁺ cells and a median number of blood CD34⁺ cells counts in 6.7 × 10⁶/L were collected among 30 successful mobilizers. Approximately 6.3% of patients required plerixafor rescue, which was successful. Nine (28.1%) of the 32 patients suffered grade 2∼3 infections, and 50% required platelet transfusions.ConclusionsWe conclude that chemo-mobilization with etoposide, Ara-C and pegfilgrastim in poorly mobilizing patients with MM or lymphoma is very effective and has acceptable toxicity.     

Mobilization and engraftment of peripheral blood stem cells in healthy related donors >55 years old

Background aimsThe increasing scarcity of young related donors has led to the use of older donors for related allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). This study analyzed the influence of age on the results of mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in healthy donors as well as on the engraftment and outcome of HSCT.MethodsA retrospective analysis from a single center was performed comparing the results of PBSC mobilization from related healthy donors according to their age.ResultsThe study included 133 consecutive related donors. The median age was 50 years (range, 4–77 years); 70 (53%) donors were males, and 44 (33%) were >55 years old. All donors were mobilized with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for 5 days. The peak CD34⁺ cell count in peripheral blood was higher in younger than in older donors (median, 90.5 CD34⁺ cells/μL [range, 18–240 CD34⁺ cells/μL] versus 72 CD34⁺ cells/μL [range, 20–172.5 CD34⁺ cells/μL], P = 0.008). The volume processed was lower in younger than in older donors (16,131 mL [range, 4424–36,906 mL] versus 18,653 mL [range, 10,003–26,261 mL], P = 0.002) with similar CD34⁺ cells collected (579.3 × 10⁶ cells [range, 135.14 × 10⁶–1557.24 × 10⁶ cells] versus 513.69 × 10⁶ cells [range, 149.81 × 10⁶–1290 × 10⁶ cells], P = 0.844). There were no differences in time to recovery of neutrophils and platelets or in the incidences of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, overall survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence.ConclusionsDonors >55 years old mobilized fewer CD34⁺ cells and required a greater volume to collect a similar number of CD34⁺ cells. The outcome of HSCT was not influenced by donor age. Donor age should not be a limitation for related allogeneic HSCT.     

Cryopreservation and thawing of hematopoietic stem cell CD34-induced apoptosis through caspase pathway activation: Key role of granulocytes

IntroductionCell damage inescapably occurs during both the freezing and the thawing graft processes for autologous hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) transplantation. To estimate HSC injury, a quality control is performed including: (i) CD34⁺ quantification; (ii) percentage of CD34⁺ viability and (iii) evaluation of HSC functional ability to form colony forming unit–granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM). Apoptosis involves complex pathways such as caspase enzymes. Here, we assess the extent of apoptosis that is caspase-dependent before and after cryoconservation of CD34⁺, using a Fluorescent Labeled Inhibitor of CAspases (FLICA).MethodsCaspase pathway activation status was evaluated in 46 patients (multiple myeloma [n = 24], lymphoma [n = 22]), by flow cytometry, using a 7-aminoactinomycin-D (7AAD)/FLICA staining test, in CD34⁺, CD3⁺, CD14⁺ and CD56⁺ cells. Viable 7AAD^?/FLICA⁺ cells were then correlated with various parameters.ResultsWe showed a significant caspase pathway activation, with 23% CD34⁺/7AAD^?/FLICA⁺ cells after thawing, compared with the 2% described in fresh CD34⁺ cells (P < 0.0001). Moreover, caspase pathway was significantly activated in thawing CD3⁺, CD56⁺ and CD14⁺ cells. We also report a significant correlation between the rate of CD34⁺/7AAD^?/FLICA⁺ cells and post-thawing granulocytes count (P = 0.042) and their potential to be differentiated into CFU-GM (P = 0.004).DiscussionOur results show substantial cell death, induced by the increase of caspase pathway activation, secondary to the thawing process, and across all study cell types. This observation may affect the immune response quality during recipient aplasia, without detecting a clinical impact. Moreover, caspase pathway activation through CD3⁺ and CD56⁺ subpopulations could modify the therapeutic result of donor lymphocytes infusion (DLI).     

Pharmacoeconomic impact of up-front use of plerixafor for autologous stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma

Background aimsStem cell collection can be a major component of overall cost of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Plerixafor is an effective agent for mobilization; however, it is often reserved for salvage therapy because of its high cost. We present data on the pharmacoeconomic impact of the use of plerixafor as an up-front mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma (MM).MethodsPatients with MM who underwent ASCT between January 2008 and April 2011 at the Mount Sinai Medical Center were reviewed retrospectively. In April 2010, practice changes were instituted for patients with MM to delay initiation of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support from day 0 to day +5 and to add plerixafor to G-CSF as an up-front autologous mobilization. Targets of collection were 5–10 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg.ResultsOf 50 adults with MM who underwent ASCT, 25 received plerixafor/filgrastim and 25 received G-CSF alone as an up-front mobilization. Compared with the control, plerixafor mobilization yielded higher CD34⁺ cell content (16.1 versus 8.4 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg; P = 0.0007) and required fewer sessions of apheresis (1.9 versus 3.1; P = 0.0001). In the plerixafor group, the mean number of plerixafor doses required per patient was 1.8. Although the overall cost of medications was higher in the plerixafor group, the cost for blood products and overall cost of hospitalization were similar between the two groups.ConclusionsUp-front use of plerixafor is an effective mobilization strategy in patients with MM and does not have a substantial pharmacoeconomic impact in overall cost of hospitalization combined with the apheresis procedure.     

A stromal-free,serum-free system to expand ex vivo hematopoietic stem cells from mobilized peripheral blood of patients with hematologic malignancies and healthy donors

Background aimsThe number of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) is critical for transplantation. The ex vivo expansion of mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) HSCs is of clinical value for reconstitution to meet clinical need.MethodsThis study proposed a simple, defined, stromal-free and serum-free culture system (SF-HSC medium) for clinical use, which is composed of Iscove's modified Dulbecco's medium, cytokine cocktails and serum substitutes. This study also characterized the cellular properties of expanded MPB CD133⁺ HSCs from patients with hematologic malignancies and healthy donors by surface antigen, colony-forming cell, long-term culture-initiating cell, gene expression and in vivo engraftment assays.ResultsThe expanded fold values of CD45⁺ white blood cells and CD34⁺, CD133⁺, CD34⁺CD38^?, CD133⁺CD38^?, CD34⁺CD133⁺, colony-forming and long-term culture-initiating cells at the end of 7-day culture from CD133⁺ MPB of hematologic malignancies were 9.4-fold, 5.9-fold, 4.0-fold, 35.8-fold, 21.9-fold, 3.8-fold, 11.8-fold and 6.7-fold, and values from healthy donor CD133⁺ MPB were 20.7-fold, 14.5-fold, 8.5-fold, 83.8-fold, 37.3-fold, 6.2-fold, 19.1-fold and 14.6-fold. The high enrichment of CD38^? cells, which were either CD34⁺ or CD133⁺, sustained the proliferation of early uncommitted HSCs. The expanded cells showed high levels of messenger RNA expression of HOBX4, ABCG2 and HTERT and had the in vivo ability to re-populate NOD/SCID mice.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated that an initial, limited number of MPB CD133⁺ HSCs could be expanded functionally in SF-HSC medium. We believe that this serum-free expansion technique can be employed in both basic research and clinical transplantation.     

Characterization of hematopoietic stem cell subsets from patients with multiple myeloma after mobilization with plerixafor

Background aimsPrevious studies have demonstrated that the combination of granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) + plerixafor is more efficient in mobilizing CD34⁺ hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) into the peripheral blood than G-CSF alone. In this study we analyzed the impact of adding plerixafor to G-CSF upon the mobilization of different HSC subsets.MethodsWe characterized the immunophenotype of HSC subsets isolated from the peripheral blood of eight patients with multiple myeloma (MM) before and after treatment with plerixafor. All patients were supposed to collect stem cells prior to high-dose chemotherapy and consecutive autologous stem cell transplantation, and therefore received front-line mobilization with 4 days of G-CSF followed by a single dose of plerixafor. Samples of peripheral blood were analyzed comparatively by flow cytometry directly before and 12 h after administration of plerixafor.ResultsThe number of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)^bright and CD34⁺ cells was significantly higher after plerixafor treatment (1.2–5.0 and 1.5–6.0 times; both P < 0.01) and an enrichment of the very primitive CD34⁺ CD38^? and ALDH^bright CD34⁺ CD38^? HSC subsets was detectable. Additionally, two distinct ALDH⁺ subsets could be clearly distinguished. The small ALDH^high subset showed a higher number of CD34⁺ CD38^? cells in contrast to the total ALDH^bright subpopulation and probably represented a very primitive subpopulation of HSC.ConclusionsA combined staining of ALDH, CD34 and CD38 might represent a powerful tool for the identification of a very rare and primitive hematopoietic stem cell subset. The addition of plerixafor mobilized not only more CD34⁺ cells but was also able to increase the proportion of more primitive stem cell subsets.     

Enumeration of viable CD34(+) cells by flow cytometry in blood, bone marrow and cord blood: results of a study of the novel BD™ stem cell enumeration kit

Background aimsEnumeration of CD34⁺ cells in leukocyte-rich cell suspensions is important for clinical decision-making in stem cell transplantation. Single-platform flow cytometry assays offer the significant advantages of speed and reproducibility, and have therefore become the gold standard in stem cell enumeration. The clinical community has recently defined the need for stem cell enumeration kits that incorporate viability dyes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel assay, BD Biosciences’ (BD) stem cell enumeration kit (SCE kit³), in relation to Beckman Coulter's (BC) commercially available BC Stem-Kit?.MethodsFresh/freeze-thawed samples from leukapheresis, bone marrow and cord blood, and fresh normal/mobilized blood, were analyzed with both assays (simultaneous detection of side/forward scatter and three fluorescence signals) on two flow cytometry platforms, BD FACSCanto II and BD FACSCalibur.ResultsResults from both assays were highly congruent, with an overall r² ≥ 0.99 (all specimen types included), a linear correlation across all CD34⁺ cell frequencies and concentrations, and an almost ideal steepness of the trend line.ConclusionsBoth assays functioned reliably. Being based on single-platform International Society of Hematotherapy and Graft Engineering (ISHAGE) guidelines and similar staining methods, both assays essentially come to identical results. For most specimen types, the viability of CD34⁺ cells was equal to overall leukocyte viability. In summary, in the hands of an experienced technician, the BD? SCE kit and the BC Stem-Kit are equivalent. The infrequent user might derive benefit from the fact that counting spheres are pre-pipetted into the Trucount tube for the SCE kit, making this assay less susceptible to pipetting inaccuracy.     

Mobilization and harvesting of peripheral blood stem cells

The use of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) as a source of hematopoietic stem cells is steadily increasing and has nearly supplanted bone marrow. The present article reviews mobilization and collection of PBSC as well as its side effects. Specialized harvesting strategies such as large volume leukapheresis (LVL) and pediatric PBSC collection are included in this overview. Under steady state conditions, less than 0.05% of the white blood cells (WBC) are CD34+ cells. Chemotherapy results in a 5-15-fold increase of PBSC. Combining chemotherapy and growth factors increases CD34+ cells up to 6% of WBC. In the allogeneic setting, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor is used alone for PBSC mobilization. Several factors affect the mobilization of PBSC: age, gender, type of growth factor, dose of the growth factor and in the autologous setting, patient's diagnosis, chemotherapy regimen and number of previous chemotherapy cycles or radiation. Harvesting of PBSC can be performed with various blood cell separators using continuous or discontinuous flow technique. Continuous flow separators allow the processing of more blood compared with intermittent flow devices resulting in higher yields of CD34+ cells for transplantation. LVL can be used to increase the CD34+ yield in patients with low CD34+ pre-counts. Processing of more blood in LVL is achieved by an increase of the blood flow rate and an altered anticoagulation regimen. Specialized strategies were developed for pediatric PBSC collection considering the main limiting factors, extracorporeal volume and vascular access. Adverse events in PBSC collection can be subdivided in apheresis associated and mobilization associated side effects. Citrate reactions due to hypocalcemia are frequent during apheresis, especially in pediatric PBSC collection and LVL. Thrombocytopenia is often observed in patients after termination of apheresis due to platelet loss during PBSC harvesting. Muscle and bone pain are frequent adverse events in allogeneic stem cell mobilization but are usually tolerated under the use of analgesics. Spleen enlargement followed by rupture is a serious complication in allogeneic donors.     

Prediction of CD34(+) cell yield in hematopoietic cell products from children by peripheral blood CD34(+) cell counts

Background aimsPeripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) are increasingly used as an alternative to bone marrow in autologous transplantations. In adult patients, the peripheral blood CD34 ⁺ cell count is a good predictor of CD34 ⁺ cell yield in apheresis. However, the determinants of stem cell yield in the pediatric population have not been well established.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 396 apheresis procedures in 301 pediatric patients. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves based on pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34 ⁺ cell counts were generated to facilitate prediction of the optimal timing of PBSC collection. The associations between CD34 ⁺ cell yield and age and mobilization regimen were analyzed.ResultsSignificant differences in CD34 ⁺ cell yield among different age groups were observed. Furthermore, higher CD34 ⁺ cell yields were obtained in patients receiving chemotherapy as part of the mobilization regimen than those without chemotherapy. A correlation was noted between the CD34 ⁺ cell yield and blood surrogate markers, including white blood cell count, absolute neutrophil count and pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34 ⁺ cell count. Cut-off values of > 35 CD34 ⁺ cells/μL in patients < 15 years old and > 45 CD34 ⁺ cells/μL in patients ≥ 15 years old were strong predictors of an adequate PBSC collection in one apheresis session. For clinical use, ROC curves and tables were generated to assist advance planning for PBSC collection.ConclusionsThe pre-apheresis peripheral blood CD34 ⁺ cell count is most useful in predicting PBSC yield. Our new cut-off values have better operating characteristics for children than the conventional value of 20 CD34 ⁺ cells/μL used for adults.     

A cross-sectional study of umbilical cord blood donor profiles and their influence on umbilical cord blood collection in a Brazilian hospital

Background aimsUmbilical cord blood (UCB) cells are a new alternative to bone marrow source for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and their use has increased in the last decade. Thus efforts are being made to improve the umbilical cord blood unit's quality. Besides compatibility, other factors, such as the total nucleated cell (TNC) count and the percentage of CD34⁺ cells in the product, are very important for a successful transplant outcome. Our aim was to describe our donor population and assess the best cord blood collection technique at Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein's cord blood bank (São Paulo, Brazil).MethodsThis was a retrospective study in which all analyses were performed simultaneously. A Student's t-test was used for qualitative variables for non-matched samples. For qualitative analyses, we used either the chi-square test or the exact Fisher's test.ResultsThe stratification of the population characteristics allowed us to determine which ones had an impact on unit volume, TNC count and percentage of CD34⁺ cells. A significant correlation was observed between donor characteristics and the quality of UCB units as related to maternal and gestational age, type of pregnancy, route of delivery, cord blood collection technique and birth weight.ConclusionsWe found that cord blood collection technique and newborn weight were significantly correlated with the TNC content. The collection technique used at our institution significantly improved the UCB unit volume and consequently the TNC count. Some findings, such as the impact of maternal age and newborn weight, have led us to re-evaluate our protocol in order to achieve better results.     

Comparison of two single-platform ISHAGE-based CD34 enumeration protocols on BD FACSCalibur and FACSCanto flow cytometers

Background aimsEnumeration of viable CD34⁺ cells provides critical information for the bone marrow (BM) transplant physician. The single-platform ISHAGE protocol is the most reliable method currently available to quantitate accurately this important subset of cells. Previous studies have shown that 5 CD34⁺ cells/µL blood predicts the collection of at least 0.5 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg patient weight. From the apheresis product, infusion of 2.5 × 10⁶ viable CD34⁺ cells (measured pre-cryopreservation)/kg patient weight will reliably permit engraftment of the hematopoietic system (as measured by the time to 20000 platelets/µL) by day 12–14 post-infusion.MethodsWe compared the CD34⁺ cell numbers derived from Flow Count-based Stem-Kit?; (Beckman Coulter) and Trucount? tube-based stem cell enumeration (SCE) kit (BD Biosciences) ISHAGE templates on BD FACSCalibur? and BD FACSCanto? cytometers on 12 granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-mobilized peripheral blood (MPB) and 10 peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) samples.ResultsComparison of results showed that there was no statistical difference between samples run with Stem-Kit on the FACSCalibur versus SCE kit-based assays on either the FACSCalibur or FACSCanto. Mean results for the Stem-Kit/Calibur combination were 137, for SCE kit/Calibur 140 and for SCE kit/Canto 137 cells/µL. Pair-wise comparison of data based on rank order showed no statistically significant difference and all correlation coefficients had an R²>0.98.ConclusionsThe two kits generated very similar data on a range of fresh samples regardless of instrument platform. These results confirm and extend the utility of the single-platform ISHAGE protocols with a variety of reagent kits and instrument platforms.     

Predictive factors for poor peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and peak CD34(+) cell count to guide pre-emptive or immediate rescue mobilization

Background aimsFailure in mobilization of peripheral blood (PB) stem cells is a frequent reason for not performing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Early identification of poor mobilizers could avoid repeated attempts at mobilization, with the administration of pre-emptive rescue mobilizationMethodsData from the first mobilization schedule of 397 patients referred consecutively for autologous HSCT between 2000 and 2010 were collected. Poor mobilization was defined as the collection of < 2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺cells/kg body weight (BW).ResultsThe median age was 53 years (range 4–70) and 228 (57%) were males. Diagnoses were multiple myeloma in 133 cases, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in 114, acute myeloid leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome in 81, Hodgkin's lymphoma in 42, solid tumors in 17 and acute lymphoblastic leukemia in 10. The mobilization regimen consisted of recombinant human granulocyte–colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in 346 patients (87%) and chemotherapy followed by G-CSF (C + G-CSF) in 51 (13%). Poor mobilization occurred in 105 patients (29%), without differences according to mobilization schedule. Diagnosis, previous therapy with purine analogs and three or more previous chemotherapy lines were predictive factors for poor mobilization. A CD34⁺cell count in PB > 13.8/μL was enough to ensure ≥ 2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺cells/kg, with high sensitivity (90%) and specificity (91%).ConclusionsThe prevalence of poor mobilization was high, being associated with disease type, therapy with purine analogs and multiple chemotherapy regimens. The threshold of CD34⁺ cell count in PB identified poor mobilizers, in whom the administration of immediate or pre-emptive plerixafor could be useful to avoid a second mobilization.     

Immune mobilization of autologous blood progenitor cells: direct influence on the cellular subsets collected

Background aimsA phase I trial examined the ability of immunotherapy to mobilize progenitor and activated T cells.MethodsInterleukin (IL)-2 was administered subcutaneously for 11 days, with granulocyte (G)-colony-stimulating factor (CSF) (5 mcg/kg/day) and granulocyte–macrophage (GM)-CSF (7.5 mcg/kg/day) added for the last 5 days. Leukapheresis was initiated on day 11. Thirteen patients were treated (myeloma n = 11, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma n = 2).ResultsToxicities were minimal. IL-2 was stopped in two patients because of capillary leak (n = 1) and diarrhea (n = 1). Each patient required 2.5 leukaphereses (median; range 1–3) to collect 3.2 × 10⁶ CD34⁺ cells/kg (median; range 1.9–6.6 × 10⁶/kg). Immune mobilization increased the number of CD3⁺ CD8⁺ T cells (P = 0.002), CD56⁺ natural killer (NK) cells (P = 0.0001), CD8⁺ CD56⁺ T cells (P = 0.002) and CD4⁺ CD25⁺ cells (P = 0.0001) compared with cancer patients mobilized with G-CSF alone. There was increased lysis of myeloma cells after 7 days (P = 0.03) or 11 days (P = 0.02). The maximum tolerated dose of IL-2 was 1 × 10⁶ IU/m²/day.ConclusionsImmune mobilization is well tolerated with normal subsequent marrow engraftment. As cells within the graft influence lymphocyte recovery, an increased number of functional lymphocytes may result in more rapid immune reconstitution.