Psychiatric Morbidity and Referral on Two General Medical Wards

Psychiatric morbidity among 230 medical inpatients was determined by a two-stage screening procedure, using the General Health Questionnaire and Standardized Psychiatric Interview. Of these patients, 23% were considered psychiatrically ill, affective disorders being the commonest illnesses encountered; and 27 (12%) were psychiatrically referred. While referral was related to severity of psychiatric illness and previous psychiatric illness, the degree to which the psychiatric illness obtruded or created problems in management appeared more crucial in determining referral. In half of those with psychiatric illness the problems did not appear to have been detected or dealt with. It is suggested that medical clerking should routinely include questions about mood and psychological responses to illness.     

Psychiatric illness in inpatients with neurological disorders: patients' views on discussion of emotional problems with neurologists.

The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity in inpatients with neurological disorders and the extent to which it is detected by neurologists were measured by using a two stage model of psychiatric assessment and from information recorded in the patients'' medical notes. The prevalence of psychiatric morbidity was estimated as 39%, of which 72% was unrecognised by the neurologists. Only a minority of patients with an uncertain physical diagnosis had a psychiatric illness, showing the error in assuming that a patient''s physical symptoms arise from a psychological disturbance if an organic aetiology cannot be determined. When the patients were interviewed on their discharge from hospital they were divided on whether they had wished to discuss their mood with neurologists while they were in hospital. The reasons that they gave suggested that interactions between patients and doctors and the lack of ward facilities for private consultations with doctors are important determinants of hidden psychiatric morbidity in medical inpatients.     

Neurasthenia as nosological dilemma

While researching concepts of neurasthenia as described by patients and physicians of various backgrounds, it was found that there is a great discrepancy between the two groups. In this study, questionnaires were administered to 70 psychiatric patients, 6 Chinese medicine men, 44 general physicians and 35 neuropsychiatrists, to inquire into the reasons for positive or negative attitudes toward neurasthenia. Half of the clinical patients believed that they were suffering from neurasthenia. Neurasthenia is a predominate term used for various types of distress arising mainly from psychiatric diseases. Chinese medicine men are aware that this term is a medical diagnosis introduced from the West. Through experience they regard neurasthenia as a kind of deficit of nerve. Apparently, the concept of neurasthenia has been integrated into the Chinese medical system, a fact substantiated by its longstanding, nosological use by the public.Younger generation physicians within both general and neuropsychiatric disciplines on the whole reject neurasthenia as a diagnostic term. However, one-third of neuropsychiatrists and 40% of general physicians use this term in their practice in order to improve the treatment of and to establish good communication and rapport with the patients whom they treat. Most of them, however, do not use the term in their formal diagnosis. The concept of the illness, neurasthenia, is historically rooted and today presents a nosological dilemma. It will eventually be transformed conceptually and disappear from the public mind.     

An Emergency Psychiatric Service in a General Hospital

The same extensive range of general hospital facilities should be allocated to emergency psychiatric illness as are available for other medical conditions. During the study herein reported, for every three medical consultations in the emergency ward of a large general hospital, two psychiatric consultations were requested. Over a two-year period when 24-hour coverage by psychiatric consultants was instituted, such assessments increased from 148 to 340 (during the first four months of each year); the increase in police referrals was outstanding, rising from 16 to 105. The general wards of the hospital assumed greater responsibility for further medical treatment, while committal to the mental hospital declined. Many more psychiatric patients could have been treated in the general hospital if facilities had been available. The development of an emergency psychiatric service is not an easy process and co-ordination with other psychiatric resources is required. Residents in training face situations in the emergency ward which are not encountered in any other aspect of their clinical experience.     

Review Article: Ambulatory Treatment of the Psychotic Crisis

Current efforts to improve the community-based care of psychiatric patients often include attempts to encourage the ambulatory treatment of acute psychosis by non-psychiatrists. New therapies and revisions of older methods now allow this to be done with many patients for whom, 15 years ago, state hospitalization would have been the first step in treatment, and often the last.Many techniques applicable to the ambulatory treatment of acute psychotic crises can be used effectively by non-psychiatrists. This review describes ambulatory treatment programs for the more commonly encountered acute psychoses. It emphasizes methods which have only recently become available and those which can be used effectively and safely by the non-specialist. With the skillfully combined use of pharmacotherapy, environmental modification, office psychotherapy, legal aids and community resources, the interested nonpsychiatrist can undertake the ambulatory treatment of many psychotic crises.     

Care of the Certified Psychiatric Patient in the General Hospital: The Saskatoon Project

The effect of admitting a random selection of 42 committed psychiatric patients to an ordinary, open general hospital psychiatric ward was studied. A control group of 44 regular psychiatric patients was formed for comparison purposes. Differences were studied by rating scales of behaviour and psychopathology and by nursing and medical observations. Though differences in ages and psychopathology were marked, the differences in behavioural problems were slight. The results are consistent with the belief that a well-trained staff can now manage practically all psychiatric admissions in a general hospital.     

Toward a Puerto Rican Popular Nosology: Nervios and Ataque de Nervios

This paper is about naming illnesses—about who determines what categories are used and the implications of these determinations. The central concerns of medical/psychiatric anthropology have been to understand popular categories of and systems for classification of illness, to examine the relationship of illness categories to cultural understandings of the body, and to interpret the role of categories of illness in mediating between the personal and social spheres. At the same time, the paper also discusses the interplay of popular categories and psychiatric diagnoses. This paper examines the multiple experiences of nervios among Puerto Ricans in Puerto Rico and New York City. Our contention is that nervios is more than a diffuse idiom of distress, and that there are different categories and experiences of nervios which provide insights into how distress is experienced and expressed by Puerto Ricans and point to different social sources of suffering. The data in this paper come from the responses to a series of open-ended questions which tapped into people's general conceptions of nervios and ataques de nervios. These questions were incorporated into follow-up interviews to an epidemiological study of the mental health of adults in Puerto Rico. The results suggest ways to incorporate these different categories of nervios into future research and clinical work with different Latino groups in the United States and in their home countries.     

Public attitudes towards psychiatry and psychiatric treatment at the beginning of the 21st century: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of population surveys

Public attitudes towards psychiatry are crucial determinants of help‐seeking for mental illness. It has been argued that psychiatry as a discipline enjoys low esteem among the public, and a “crisis” of psychiatry has been noted. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of population studies examining public attitudes towards various aspects of psychiatric care. Our search in PubMed, Web of Science, PsychINFO and bibliographies yielded 162 papers based on population surveys conducted since 2000 and published no later than 2015. We found that professional help for mental disorders generally enjoys high esteem. While general practitioners are the preferred source of help for depression, mental health professionals are the most trusted helpers for schizophrenia. If respondents have to rank sources of help, they tend to favor mental health professionals, while open questions yield results more favorable to general practitioners. Psychiatrists and psychologists/psychotherapists are equally recommended for the treatment of schizophrenia, while for depression psychologists/psychotherapists are more recommended, at least in Europe and America. Psychotherapy is consistently preferred over medication. Attitudes towards seeking help from psychiatrists or psychologists/psychotherapists as well as towards medication and psychotherapy have markedly improved over the last twenty‐five years. Biological concepts of mental illness are associated with stronger approval of psychiatric help, particularly medication. Self‐stigma and negative attitudes towards persons with mental illness decrease the likelihood of personally considering psychiatric help. In conclusion, the public readily recommends psychiatric help for the treatment of mental disorders. Psychotherapy is the most popular method of psychiatric treatment. A useful strategy to further improve the public image of psychiatry could be to stress that listening and understanding are at the core of psychiatric care.     

Medical Student Attitudes Towards People with Mental Illness in China: A Qualitative Study

Stigma towards people with mental illness is a worldwide concern. A five-nation survey of medical student attitudes towards people with mental illness recently reported far lower levels of social acceptance among Chinese medical students compared to those from the US, Brazil, Ghana, and Nigeria. This qualitative study presented recent Chinese medical school graduates with probes based on questions used in the aforementioned cross-national study to elicit their views of factors underlying the negative attitudes towards social acceptance of people with mental illness. One-hour interviews were conducted with twenty psychiatry residents in June, 2016. Of 241 coded responses concerning negative attitudes, 51.5% were coded as reflecting fear of violent behavior, 22.8% as loss of face (i.e. shame from interpersonal associations), 17.0% lowered social status, 4.98% nonconforming social behavior, and 3.73% the heritability of mental illness. Low levels of social acceptance of individuals with mental illness among medical students in China are largely related to fears of violence of and loss of face. Understanding the attitudes of medical students may inform efforts to reduce stigma through educational initiatives targeted at both medical students and the general public.     

Hospitalization for mental illness: evaluation of admission trends from 1941 to 1971.

A study of the diagnostic composition of the inpatient population of Ontario and Canadian psychiatric facilities has shown an important change in hospital-treated illness over the period 1941-71. Patients with nonpsychotic disorders accounted for 54% of all admissions to Ontario public mental hospitals in 1971, compared with only 8% in 1941. The trend was similar for both first admissions and proportion of readmissions, and was similar for psychiatric units of general hospitals. In contrast, the overall rate of first admission for psychotic disorders to inpatient facilities remained remarkably constant over time, as did the proportion of readmissions among all admissions. The findings dispel the notion that the increasing proportion of readmissions is due largely to a rapid turnover of former long-stay psychotic patients (the "revolving-door phenomenon"). The findings could not be attributed to a changing prevalence of types of psychiatric illness, increased availability of psychiatric inpatient facilities or comprehensive medical insurance.     

Long-term outcome of patients with neurotic illness in general practice.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the 11 year outcome of neurotic disorder in general practice. DESIGN--Cohort study over 11 years. SETTING--Two general practices in Warwickshire England. SUBJECTS--100 patients selected to be representative of those identified nationally by general practitioners as having neurotic disorders. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Mortality, morbidity, and use of health services. RESULTS--At 11 years 87 subjects were traced. The 11 year standardised mortality ratio was 173 (95% confidence interval 164 to 200). 47 were cases on the general health questionnaire, 32 had a relapsing or chronic psychiatric course, and 49 a relapsing or chronic physical course. Treatment for psychiatric illness was mainly drugs. The mean number of consultations per year was 10.8 (median 8.7). A persistent psychiatric diagnosis at one year follow up was associated with high attendance ( > 12 visits a year for 11 years) at follow up after age, sex, and physical illness were adjusted for. Severity of psychiatric illness (general health questionnaire score) at outset predicted general health questionnaire score at 11 year follow up, course of psychiatric illness, and high consultation rate. CONCLUSION--These data support the view that a neurotic illness can become chronic and is associated with raised mortality from all causes and high use of services. Such patients need effective intervention, particularly those with a more severe illness who do not recover within one year.     

Treatment of Depression in General Practice

With the co-operation of the family doctors in five selected urban general practices the general-practitioner treatment of 73 patients suffering from a new episode of depressive illness was evaluated over a period of four months. The purpose was to test the belief that general practitioners are best fitted to manage most psychological ailments, and depression was chosen as the psychiatric illness most commonly seen in general practice. Medication was the principal treatment offered, and this was often inadequate in dosage or the patient defaulted. Drug defaulting was thought to be due partly to failure of supervision and follow-up and to too low a consultation rate. The low consultation rate was also thought to explain why few patients thought there was a therapeutic value in the doctor-patient relationship. The results of the study indicate that patients with depressive illness do not receive the best treatment in general practice. The reasons are several and responsibility must be shared by the medical practitioners, the current system of the general practice, and the patients themselves.     

Prevention of Mental Disorder—The Role of the General Practitioner

As prevention in psychiatry really refers to early detection and consequent prevention of complications and chronicity, the general practitioner is the most important person in the medical community in preventing mental disorders. As more postgraduate courses in psychiatry become available to practicing family physicians, the majority of patients with psychiatric disorders will be effectively managed by the general medical practitioner.The family physician is already doing this, although not as well as he could. In some instances, he may be unaware of the extent to which the disease with which he deals is psychic disease. As the number of community health centers increases, family physicians will play a vital role in their function. With the necessary knowledge to detect psychic disturbance and to treat emotional disorders effectively, the family physician will prevent many of the instances of progression to chronic psychiatric illness with which we are now plagued. The psychiatrist of the future will act as consultant, treating only patients with the more complicated mental disorders.     

SUICIDE PROBLEMS IN MEDICAL PRACTICE

Increasing awareness by physicians in general medical practice of the possibility of suicide in nonpsychiatric patients is indispensable for the evaluation of suicide risk and for a practical approach to the problem of prevention.An analysis was made of the records of 11 cases of suicide by medical and surgical patients who were in a general nonpsychiatric Veterans Administration hospital for evaluation and treatment of physical disease.It was noted that the general hospital staff had a low index of suspicion of the possibility of suicide in general hospital patients.It appeared from this study that there is a definite suicide risk in older persons hospitalized for physical illness who develop psychotic reactions during the course of their illness and hospitalization. The signs and symptoms of toxic and organic psychosis in these older patients were not recognized and their significance relative to suicide risk was not appreciated. Although psychiatric signs of severe emotional disturbance appeared clinically obvious at least 24 hours before suicide in ten of the eleven patients, no suicide risk was considered present, nor were adequate precautions taken by the hospital staff. This was owing to the lack of psychiatric orientation among the nonpsychiatric physicians.     

On the Moral Acceptability of Physician‐Assisted Dying for Non‐Autonomous Psychiatric Patients

Several authors have recently suggested that the suffering caused by mental illness could provide moral grounds for physician‐assisted dying. Yet they typically require that psychiatric‐assisted dying could come to question in the cases of autonomous, or rational, psychiatric patients only. Given that also non‐autonomous psychiatric patients can sometimes suffer unbearably, this limitation appears questionable. In this article, I maintain that restricting psychiatric‐assisted dying to autonomous, or rational, psychiatric patients would not be compatible with endorsing certain end‐of‐life practices commonly accepted in current medical ethics and law, practices often referred to as ‘passive euthanasia’.     

Census of single homeless people in Sheffield.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the number of single homeless people in Sheffield and to examine their demography and social and medical details. DESIGN--Census carried out between 8 am and 8 pm on one day. Participants completed a questionnaire designed to provide data relating to employment history, contact with welfare and health services, social state, prison history, medical history, and health state. SETTING--Sites in Sheffield identified by local workers as being places of residence of homeless people. SUBJECTS--340 single homeless people. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Self reported history of alcohol or drug misuse, existence of a chronic medical condition, and use of general practitioner and hospital services. RESULTS--The mean age of the population was 42.5 years and a quarter of the population were aged less than 30; there were 48 women. Significant differences were noted between men and women with respect to self reported psychiatric illness (77/266 men v 27/42 women), self reported alcoholism (83/273 v 4/44), prison history (152/255 v 8/41), and registration with a general practitioner (73/275 v 38/46). Various chronic medical conditions were reported, and the perceived health state of the population was low; 129 claimed to have been admitted to a psychiatric hospital. 220 people were registered with a general practitioner, and 179 claimed to see their doctor. Sixty five had attended or been admitted to a general hospital in the month preceding the study, 45 for accident and emergency services. CONCLUSIONS--The homeless in this population were younger than those found in previous studies. The prevalence of psychiatric illness was high in the population, and the overall health state was poor. Most subjects obtained health services from general practitioners.     

Why psychiatric conditions are special: an evolutionary and cross-cultural perspective

In non-Western and premodern societies, approaches to sickness involved moral considerations laden with existential and spiritual implications. Healers and physicians had access to this aspect of their patient's lives, were expected to use it constructively, and often did so. The contemporary biomedical theory of disease no longer assigns to illness such metaphysical connotations. While general physicians are permitted - perhaps even advised - to avoid involvement in morally laden dialogues tied to illness and the self, such dilemmas are more prominent and qualitatively different in psychiatry, as psychiatric conditions often entail changes in self-conception, psychological disaffection, unacceptable behavior, and untoward personal reactions to social circumstances. Manifestations of psychiatric conditions can overwhelm an individual's control in areas of cognition, emotion, autonomy, social responsibility, behavior, and body functions - exactly those matters that "modern" individualistic minds are supposed to master. Consequently, psychiatric conditions challenge basic presuppositions of the modern, secular credo about personhood, disease, and behavior. They comprise a species of human problems ontologically distinct from the conditions handled by other medical disciplines.     

Problems of Community Psychiatry

An analysis of existing psychiatric facilities in the community reveals their heterogeneity and fragmentation. Parallel, overlapping and non-communicating, they deal with treatment in a piecemeal fashion and with prevention only by default. Divorce between the different therapeutic phases of what is often the same illness violates any continuity of care. The provincial mental hospital, which arose in part out of social pressure to isolate the “mad” patient, finds itself, often enough, isolated in turn from the community it serves.Greater integration of available treatment resources for the psychiatric patient would serve both his interest and the general concepts of preventive and rehabilitative medicine. An understanding of how this may be achieved may engender social and professional impetus toward the accomplishment. The general hospital is a logical coordinating focus for these facilities and when it has adopted this role this might lead to a greater acceptance of emotional illness by both patients and doctors.     

Définition du seuil de la pathologie nommée “dysfonctions érectiles”. Où commence l’insuffisance érectile?

“Erectile dysfunction” is a poor term and should be replaced by “erectile insufficiency”, as although everybody knows the function of erections obtained in response to sexual excitation, the role of nocturnal erections (about 95% of erection time) is unknown. Although erectile insufficiency is generally experienced as a cruel handicap, it may not justify the status of a disease. It is also questionable to make it a psychiatric illness. Finally, erection and sexuality in general, should not be confined within certain norms, even when these norms are defined by the medical profession. However, the physician is faced with all these problems presented by this normal man who consults for impotence at a time when drugs are now available on the market, which are able to induce or facilitate erection (this latter group was previously called aphrodisiacs).     

The confederation worm token.

To an increasing degree the psychiatrist is oriented to the community and general hospital either as consultant, therapist, or collaborator in overall patient management. In these new roles, he becomes a more comprehensive physician and also conveys psychiatric insights to his colleagues.Psychological factors and the patient''s personality “style” influence the development and course of every disease, complicating diagnosis and effective treatment. It is a basic requirement that a good working alliance be established between patient and physician. This is assisted by comprehensive history taking, which clarifies the lifesetting in which the illness began, the patient''s personality and his habitual reactions of emotional regression under stress. It will also point up errors introduced by the patient, omissions, and distortions in offering the subjective data which the physician must evaluate.Seven major personality types and appropriate physician responses are outlined: the dependent demanding oral patient, the orderly controlled obsessive, the dramatic seductive hysteric, the long-suffering masochist, the querulous paranoid, the overbearing narcissist and the aloof withdrawn schizoid.The non-psychiatrist can resolve complex and puzzling medical problems if he has an increased awareness of how emotional forces complicate illness and if he can exploit comprehensive history taking to the full.