输尿管上段嵌顿性结石两种微创钬激光碎石术临床疗效对比研究

目的:探讨应用钬激光在输尿管镜碎石术及微创经皮肾穿刺取石术处理输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的疗效和并发症的比较。方法:2009年2月～2011年6月我院182例输尿管上段嵌顿性结石患者,应用钬激光经URL治疗85例,MPCNL治疗97例,对两种方法疗效进行临床评价比较。结果:MPCNL术中一期碎石清除率为(93/97)95.88%,5例残石者残石大小0.2～0.4 mm,术后1月结石清除率为(97/97)100%,平均手术时间75±29 min,平均住院时间为12±5 d,平均住院费用14589±3284 RMB;URL术一期碎石清除率为(39/85)45.88%,46例残石者残石大小0.3～1.5 mm,需术后联合体外冲击波碎石术等治疗排石,术后1月结石清除率为(72/85)84.71%,平均手术时间102±43 min,平均住院时间为6±3 d,平均住院费用9086±1259 RMB。MPCNL术中有1例因穿刺后出血改行二期MPCNL术。URL术中输尿管扭曲、狭窄、息肉出血视野模糊不清,需改行切开取石术6例,结石移位到肾内改行MPCNL术11例。结论:对于嵌顿性输尿管上段结石,采用MPCNL和URL联合钬激光治疗各有其优缺点。MPCNL安全、高效、并发症少、创伤小、结石清除率高;URL相对具有恢复快、住院时间短、费用较低等优点,但结石移位发生率、残石率较高,需其他辅助方式治疗结石。因此输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的手术方式选择应根据结石位置、大小、梗阻程度、肾积水量、患者经济状况,术前检查结果,充分评估手术风险和难度,结合患者个体差异,术者的经验制定出最佳治疗方案。     

Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: first 1000 cases at the London Stone Clinic.

One thousand patients underwent extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for renal and ureteric calculi at this clinic. An overall success rate of 91.8% was achieved (stone free or less than 2 mm fragments at three months) and for stones measuring 1 cm 96.3%. Lithotripsy produced extremely low morbidity, and no deaths have occurred at the clinic. Patients who had lithotripsy alone had a mean hospital stay of three days and in most instances were able to perform their full range of activities on discharge. Planned combination of lithotripsy with minimally invasive endourological procedures such as percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureterorenoscopy has allowed us to extend the range of treatable cases to include large stones. Prophylactic use of Double-J ureteric stents in selected cases has reduced the incidence of obstruction by stone fragments after lithotripsy, thereby decreasing morbidity and hospital stay.     

侧卧体位下经皮肾穿刺取石术联合经尿道输尿管镜取石术治疗复杂上尿路结石的临床应用价值

目的：探讨侧卧体位下经皮肾穿刺取石术联合经尿道输尿管镜取石术治疗复杂上尿路结石的可行性及临床应用价值。方法：回顾性分析2009年8月至2011年9月我院采用侧卧体住下经皮肾穿刺取石术联合经尿道输尿管镜取石术治疗复杂上尿路结石患者52例的临床资料：患者同时存在肾脏铸型结石或多发结石和或输尿管上段结石,单个结石最大径8-30mm。结果：平均手术时间60分钟（50—120分钟）;术前血红蛋白116±30g／L,术后第一天复查105±26g／L,无大出血需要输血病例;一次结石取净率为86．5％（45／52）,总取净率为92．3％（48／52）。结论：侧卧体位下经皮肾穿刺取石术及经尿道输尿管镜取石术两种术式联合应用具有可行性及互补性,在预防及减少术中出血、获得清晰的手术视野、减少灌注液外渗、增加结石清除速度及碎石成功率、缩短手术时间、减少术后发热等方面疗效显著,为治疗复杂上尿路结石提供了一个可行的新方法。     

胆道镜结合微爆破碎石治疗复杂性胆道结石

目的:探讨微爆破碎石用于治疗复杂胆道结石的治疗体会。方法:在胆道镜直视下,分别在术中和术后对158例复杂的胆道结石患者进行微爆破碎石,然后用取石网取出碎石,泥沙状结石随液体流出或让其自行流入肠道。结果:158例患者156例取石成功。取石成功率98.73%。明显提高了胆道取石的成功率。无1例出现胆道穿孔、瘘道穿孔及胆道出血等严重并发症。结论:在胆道镜下,采用微爆破碎石术治疗复杂的胆道结石是一种安全、可靠、高效的方法,可以明显提高结石的取净率。     

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Management of Residual Stones after Ureterolithotripsy versus Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

To compare the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in managing residual stones after ureterolithotripsy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was carried out of 71 patients with proximal urinary tract stones (greater than 10 mm) who underwent ureterolithotripsy or mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a single institution from 2009 to 2011. The 71 patients were divided into two groups: group I (n = 37) comprised patients who underwent ureterolithotripsy, and group II (n = 34) comprised patients who underwent mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Clinical characteristics, stone-free rates, stone demographics, and complications were evaluated.

Results

The overall stone-free rate was 90.1%. The stone-free rates in groups I and II were 97.3% and 82.4%, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the stone-free rates between groups I and II (P = 0.035). Neither serious intraoperative nor postoperative complications were observed. No significant difference in complications was observed between the two groups (P = 0.472).

Conclusions

The results of our study suggest that extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy is an effective and safe auxiliary procedure for managing residual stones after primary endoscopic surgery. This procedure is associated with a satisfactory stone-free rate and a low complication rate, particularly for residual stones after ureteroscopic procedures.     

Laser lithotripsy in the treatment of ureteral calculi.

We examined the effectiveness of laser lithotripsy with a flash-lamp-pumped tunable dye laser in the treatment of ureteral calculi that were too large for direct extraction and that could not be treated with or had not responded to extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) or forms of ureteroscopic lithotripsy other than laser lithotripsy. In 20 (74%) of the 27 patients the laser alone successfully fragmented the calculi into pieces small enough to pass spontaneously or to be easily extracted with a basket. In five (19%) laser lithotripsy was partially successful: another procedure (ESWL in three and fragment extraction with a basket in two) was needed. In two patients (7%) the stones could not be fragmented with the laser, and either ESWL or percutaneous antegrade extraction was performed. At follow-up 3 months after treatment there was no sign of stone fragments in 26 (96%) of the patients. We believe that laser lithotripsy is a safe and effective method of ureteral stone fragmentation.     

Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy

A percutaneous method was used to remove stones from otherwise normal gall bladders, as assessed by cholecystography and ultrasonography. The procedure was performed in a single stage under general anaesthesia, adopting the method and instruments used for one stage percutaneous nephrolithotomy. A Foley catheter was left in the gall bladder and the system checked with contrast at 10 days to ensure free drainage and exclude residual calculi. Seven out of eight patients had a successful percutaneous cholecystolithotomy. An adequate track could not be secured in one man; he had an uneventful cholecystectomy under the same anaesthetic. Follow up at three months of the seven patients showed no calculi and no complications.Percutaneous cholecystolithotomy may prove complementary to extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy in patients in whom there is difficulty focusing the shock waves on the gall bladder or who have had incomplete disintegration of stones.     

胆道镜结合微爆破碎石治疗复杂性胆道结石

目的：探讨微爆破碎石用于治疗复杂胆道结石的治疗体会。方法：在胆道镜直视下,分别在术中和术后对158例复杂的胆道结石患者进行微爆破碎石,然后用取石网取出碎石,泥沙状结石随液体流出或让其自行流入肠道。结果：158例患者156例取石成功。取石成功率98.73%。明显提高了胆道取石的成功率。无1例出现胆道穿孔、瘘道穿孔及胆道出血等严重并发症。结论：在胆道镜下,采用微爆破碎石术治疗复杂的胆道结石是一种安全、可靠、高效的方法,可以明显提高结石的取净率。     

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the first 50 patients treated in Britain.

Fifty patients have been treated for upper tract urinary calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) at the Devonshire Hospital lithotripter centre since November 1984. The average stay for an inpatient was 3 X 7 days. All patients suffered minimal postoperative discomfort and nearly all resumed normal activity within one day after discharge. Complications requiring auxiliary procedures were few. The procedure was found to be safe, cost effective, extremely well received by patients, and superior to all other methods of removing renal stones. This study confirms that treatment by ESWL is a specialised urological procedure that requires operators who are also trained in open, percutaneous, and ureteroscopic surgery and with a back up of a radiological team skilled in percutaneous renal puncture.     

Optimizing Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Comprehensive Review

Shock wave lithotripsy is a commonly used procedure for eradicating upper urinary tract stones in patients who require treatment. A number of methods have been proposed to improve the results of this procedure, including proper patient selection, modifications in technique, adjunctive therapy to facilitate elimination of fragments, and changes in lithotripter design. This article assesses the utility of these measures through an analysis of contemporary literature.Key Words: Shock wave lithotripsy, Upper urinary tract stones, ComminutionShock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is commonly utilized to treat patients with upper urinary tract stones. It is now clear that proper patient selection, modifications in treatment technique, and employment of adjunctive measures can be utilized to optimize SWL results. In addition, certain future changes in lithotripter design may prove to be beneficial. Herein, we review methods to improve SWL results.     

输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术治疗下段输尿管结石的临床疗效分析

目的:探讨输尿管镜钬激光碎石术与气压弹道碎石术治疗下段输尿管结石的临床疗效。方法:选取146例输尿管下段结石患者,将所有患者随机分为试验组和治疗组两组,其中试验组患者均采取输尿管镜钬激光碎石术进行治疗,而对照组患者则采取气压弹道碎石术进行治疗,比较两组患者手术前后的血清肌酐(Serum creatinine,Sc R)和血尿素氮(Blood urea nitrogen,BUN)等手术指标。结果:对照组患者完成手术所需要的时间和住院时间以及血尿时间均明显长于试验组患者,对照组患者之中的碎石成功率为71.91%(105例),明显低于试验组患者的碎石成功率84.25%(123例),两组患者之间的数据比较均有统计学意义(均P0.05)。两组患者手术之前的BUN和Sc R水平均无明显差异,而在手术之后两组患者的BUN和Sc R水平均显著降低,并且试验组患者的降低幅度明显大于对照组患者(均P0.05)。试验组患者在术后一个月时的结石排净率为94.52%,明显高于对照组患者的83.56%(P0.05);试验组患者的并发症发生率为3.42%,明显低于对照组患者的13.01%(P0.05);并且试验组患者的止痛药使用比例为20.00,明显低于对照组患者的34.62(均P0.05)。结论:输尿管镜钬激光碎石术在治疗输尿管下段结石方面效果显著,且具有安全性高和创伤小以及恢复速度快等优势。     

微通道经皮肾镜与输尿管软镜碎石取石术对输尿管上段结石患者血液流变学及男性性功能指标的影响

摘要 目的：以血液流变学及男性性功能指标为主要观察指标分析微通道经皮肾镜取石术（MPCNL）与输尿管软镜碎石取石术（FURL）在输尿管上段结石（UUC）中的应用价值。方法：将80例男性UUC患者按简单随机化法分MPCNL组、FURL组各40例;比较两组清石率、血液流变学、性功能指标及不良反应。结果：两组术后1w（82.50% vs 85.00%）、术后1mo（92.50% vs 97.50%）、术后3mo（100.00% vs 100.00%）的清石率无统计学意义（P＞0.05）。FURL组术后1天、术后7天的血液流变学指标水平均低于MPCNL组（P＜0.05）。两组术后男性性功能指标较术前显著改善,但FURL组术后3mo、6mo的男性性功能指标改善更显著（P＜0.05）。结论：对于UUC患者,MPCNL和FURL均能有效清除结石,都是安全有效的方法,但FURL较MPCNL对患者术后血液流变学的影响更小,且更利于术后性功能的恢复。     

彩色多普勒超声引导下经皮肾镜取石术（PCNL）治疗复杂性肾结石的临床分析

目的：总结彩色多普勒超声引导下经皮肾镜取石术（percutaneousnephrolithotomy,PCNL）治疗的复杂性肾结石的经验及其安全性、有效性以及常见并发症。方法：回顾性分析我院2011年7月-2012年8月采用彩色多普勒引导下经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石患者56例的临床资料。结果：所有患者均I期建立经皮肾通道,平均手术时间（107．5±27．5）分钟,24例行EMS气压弹道联合超声碎石（1001．0±27．9）分钟,20例行钬激光联合超声碎石（119．4±23．6）分钟,10例行单纯超声碎石（108．2±30．2）分钟,EMS气压弹道联合超声碎石组的手术时间少于钬激光碎石组,差异有统计学意义（P〈0．05,单纯超声碎石组与另外两组比较无统计学意义P〉0．05）。术前肾功能损伤患者术后随访,肾功能明显改善。结石完全清除率91％,结石部分残留率9％。术中均无严重出血,无周边脏器损伤。术后出现迟发出血5例,反复发热4例,均经对症治疗后缓解。结论：彩色多普勒超声引导除了具有普通超声引导的优势外,还可有效避开肾实质大血管损伤,减少术中及术后出血风险。彩色多普勒超声引导下经皮肾镜碎石取石术是一种治疗复杂性肾结石安全、有效的方法。     

输尿管单发结石患者体外冲击波碎石术的冲击波频率研究及碎石效果的影响因素探讨

摘要 目的：探讨输尿管单发结石患者体外冲击波碎石术（ESWL）的最佳冲击波频率,并分析碎石效果的影响因素。方法：选取2020年4月~2022年4月期间来空军第九八六医院接受治疗的输尿管单发结石患者148例作为研究对象,按照不同治疗频率将患者分为低频组（48例,频率为60~70次/min）、中频组（51例,频率为80~90次/min）和高频组（49例,频率为100~120次/min）,观察三组患者的碎石结局、肾功能指标以及并发症发生情况。统计三组患者的碎石结局,按照碎石结局的不同分为成功组和失败组。收集所有患者的一般资料,采用多因素Logistic回归分析输尿管单发结石患者碎石效果的影响因素。结果：三组碎石成功率组间对比无统计学差异（P>0.05）。三组术后1 d、术后14 d尿素氮（BUN）、血肌酐（Scr）均升高后下降（P<0.05）。高频组、中频组术后1 d BUN、Scr均高于低频组,且高频组高于中频组（P<0.05）。高频组、中频组的并发症总发生率高于低频组（P<0.05）。单因素分析显示,输尿管单发结石患者ESWL术后碎石失败与病程、结石位置、结石直径、肾绞痛、结石嵌顿、服用坦索罗辛有关（P<0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,病程偏长、结石位置中下段、结石直径偏大、结石嵌顿、未服用坦索罗辛是碎石失败的危险因素（P＜0.05）。结论：低、中、高三种频率下的ESWL用于输尿管单发结石患者,均有较好的碎石效果。但随着频率的增加,患者一过性肾功能损伤增大,且并发症发生风险也相应增加。此外,病程偏长、结石位置中下段、结石直径偏大、结石嵌顿、未服用坦索罗辛是碎石失败的危险因素,可考虑结合上述因素进行综合评估选择最佳治疗方式。     

Electrohydraulic lithotripsy with peroral choledochoscopy.

OBJECTIVE--To determine the efficacy of peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy performed with an extra large duodenoscope (outside diameter 14.8 mm) and a choledochoscope with a diameter of 4.1 mm (Olympus "mother and baby" endoscope system) in the removal of very large stones from the common bile duct. DESIGN--Prospective study of patients with giant stones in the common bile duct that were resistant to extraction by conventional means. SETTING--Endoscopy unit at a university hospital. PATIENTS--Four women and one man aged 48-82 (mean 66.4 years) with a total of nine stones in their common bile ducts ranging from 2.2 to 3.6 cm in diameter. INTERVENTIONS--Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy was performed after intravenous sedation and under antibiotic cover. Two endoscopists took part in each procedure, coordination being achieved by means of a video monitor. The procedures were performed with a Lithotron EL-23 lithotripter and a 3 French lithotripsy probe inserted through the choledochoscope under direct vision. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Complete clearance of the common bile duct confirmed by occlusion cholangiography. RESULTS--All nine stones (mean minimal diameter 2.6 cm; mean maximal diameter 3.1 cm) were successfully fragmented by electrohydraulic lithotripsy, allowing subsequent extraction with the aid of endoscopy and clearance of the common bile duct. A median of three (range two to five) sessions of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography were required to achieve complete clearance of the ducts. Patients stayed a median of eight days in hospital after lithotripsy (range eight to 14). There were no complications. CONCLUSION--Peroral electrohydraulic lithotripsy offers a safe and effective alternative for the management of patients with large stones in the common bile duct.     

应用管路封堵器处理输尿管上段结石的随机对照研究

目的:研究辅助使用管路封堵器后,采用输尿管镜下碎石术处理输尿管上段结石的效果及安全性。方法:选取自2012年6月至2013年2月需输尿管镜处理输尿管上段结石的病例198例,随机分为应用管路封堵器组98例和对照组100例。封堵器组术中输尿管镜发现结石后,封堵器组患者使用英诺伟IVX-SC10型管路封堵器超越结石远端封堵结石,再予钬激光碎石,对照组术中输尿管镜发现结石后,直接予钬激光碎石,术后留置双J管2至4周。记录并随访患者输尿管镜术后结石清除率及肾脏出血相关并发症。结果:管路封堵器组碎石成功率95.9%(94/98),对照组碎石成功率81.0%(81/100),两组有统计学差异(P=0.0011)。碎石成功后管路封堵器组出现3例(3.2%)肾脏破裂出血,而对照组无肾脏破裂出血,两组无统计学差异(P=0.1048)。结论:辅助应用管路封堵器能提高输尿管镜对于输尿管上段结石的碎石成功率;其使用并没有增加术后肾脏出血并发症的发生。     

坦洛新对输尿管下段结石患者体外冲击波碎石术后排石及血清IL-6，IL-10和CRP水平的影响

目的:探讨输尿管下段结石行体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)后应用坦洛新辅助排石的临床效果及对患者血清白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、C反应蛋白(CRP)水平的影响。方法:选取我院2015年1月～2016年12月收治的122例输尿管下段结石患者,采用随机数字表法均分为两组。于ESWL术后,对照组给予硝苯地平治疗,观察组予以坦洛新治疗。记录比较两组术后排石效果、疼痛情况,治疗前后血清IL-6、IL-10和CRP水平的变化及不良反应的发生情况。结果:治疗后,观察组无石率(91.8%)明显高于对照组(78.7%)(P0.05);观察组排石时间短于对照组,排石直径大于对照组(P0.05);观察组患者血清IL-6,IL-10及CRP水平均显著低于对照组(P0.05)。与对照组相比,观察组肾绞痛发生率、镇痛剂使用率及VAS评分均较低(P0.01)。用药期间,两组均未发生明显不良反应(P0.05)。结论:坦洛新能有效提高输尿管下段结石患者体外冲击波碎石术的排石效果,减轻机体损伤,缓解术后疼痛,并且安全性较高。     

Surgical Management of Urolithiasis in Patients after Urinary Diversion

Objective

To present our experience in surgical management of urolithiasis in patients after urinary diversion.

Patients and Methods

Twenty patients with urolithiasis after urinary diversion received intervention. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, percutaneous based antegrade ureteroscopy with semi-rigid or flexible ureteroscope, transurethral reservoir lithotripsy, percutaneous pouch lithotripsy and open operation were performed in 8, 3, 2, 6, and 1 patients, respectively. The operative finding and complications were retrospectively collected and analyzed.

Results

The mean stone size was 4.5±3.1 (range 1.5–11.2) cm. The mean operation time was 82.0±11.5 (range 55–120) min. Eighteen patients were rendered stone free with a clearance of 90%. Complications occurred in 3 patients (15%). Two patients (10%) had postoperative fever greater than 38.5°C, and one patient (5%) suffered urine extravasations from percutaneous tract.

Conclusions

The percutaneous based procedures, including percutaneous nephrolithotomy, antegrade ureteroscopy with semi-rigid ureteroscope or flexible ureteroscope from percutaneous tract, and percutaneous pouch lithotripsy, provides a direct and safe access to the target stones in patients after urinary diversion, and with high stone free rate and minor complications. The surgical management of urolithiasis in patients after urinary diversion requires comprehensive evaluation and individualized consideration depending upon the urinary diversion type, stone location, stone burden, available resource and surgeon experience.     

输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的临床效果及对患者炎症反应、应激反应的影响

目的:探讨输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的临床效果及对患者炎症反应与应激反应的影响。方法:收集2018年1月至2019年5月我院收治的96例肾结石患者作为研究对象,依据治疗方式分为观察组与对照组,每组48例。观察组患者采用输尿管软镜取石术,对照组采用经皮肾镜碎石术,比较两组患者的手术相关指标、并发症的发生情况、治疗前后血清白介素-6(IL-6)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、皮质醇(Cor)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)及去甲肾上腺素(NE)水平的变化。结果:观察组的手术时间明显长于对照组(P0.05),术中出血量及术后住院时间低于对照组(P0.05);两组的结石清除率比较无统计学差异(P0.05)。观察组的并发症发生率低于对照组(P0.05)。术后24 h,两组患者的血清IL-6、CRP、Cor、ACTH、NE水平均较治疗前显著升高,且对照组以上指标均明显高于观察组(P0.05)。结论:输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗直径≤2 cm的肾结石的临床效果相当,但输尿管软镜碎石术导致的术中出血量更少,引起的炎症反应及应激反应更轻,安全性更高。     

ESWL treatment of urinary stones in children--the overview of 14 years of experience

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) treatment has been used at Department of Urology, University Hospital "Osijek", Croatia, since July 1988. Until December 2001 seven thousand and eight hundred patients underwent ESWL for urinary stones, 68 of them were children (0.87%). Sixty-eight children aged 4 to 15 years (average 10.14 years) underwent ESWL. They were treated for the total of 91 stones: 35 (38.46%) caliceal, 23 (25.27%) in pyelon, 7 (7.69%) in pyeloureteric segment and 14 (15.38%) ureteral. Staghorn calculi were found in 6 (6.59%) patients and multiple stones (four or more stones in the same kidney) in 6 (6.59%). There was total of 95 ESWL sessions performed in 68 patients (1.39 session per patient). Fifty-six patients (82.35%) without residual stones found at the control plain film and sonography of urinary tract were considered "stone free". Addition of 5 patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments (less than 4 mm) increases overall success rate to 89.70%. ESWL is a simple, safe and effective procedure in the management of urolithiasis in childhood. Clinical experience of our institution confirms ESWL as the first line treatment for kidney stones in the pediatric age patients.