RRM proteins interacting with the cap region of topoisomerase I

RNA recognition motif (RRM) domains bind both nucleic acids and proteins. Several proteins that contain two closely spaced RRM domains were previously found in protein complexes formed by the cap region of human topoisomerase I, a nuclear enzyme responsible for DNA relaxation or phosphorylation of SR splicing proteins. To obtain molecular insight into specific interactions between the RRM proteins and the cap region of topo I we examined their binary interactions using the yeast two-hybrid system. The interactions were established for hnRNP A1, p54(nrb) and SF2/ASF, but not for hnRNP L or HuR. To identify the amino acid pattern responsible for binding, experimental mutagenesis was employed and computational modelling of these processes was carried out. These studies revealed that two RRM domains and six residues of the consensus sequence are required for the binding to the cap region. On the basis of the above data, a structural model for the hnRNP A1-topoisomerase I complex was proposed. The main component of the hnRNP A1 binding site is a hydrophobic pocket on the beta-surface of the first RRM domain, similar to that described for Y14 protein interacting with Mago. We demonstrated that the interaction between RRM domains and the cap region was important for the kinase reaction catalyzed by topoisomerase I. Together with the previously described inhibitory effect of RRM domains of SF2/ASF on DNA cleavage, the above suggests that the binding of RRM proteins could regulate the activity of topoisomerase I.     

SF2/ASF protein binds to the cap region of human topoisomerase I through two RRM domains

DNA relaxation catalysed by topoisomerase I is based on the reversible DNA cleavage. The reaction is inhibited by binding of splicing protein SF2/ASF, a substrate for the kinase activity of topoisomerase I. In this paper, we show a novel binding site for SF2/ASF in the cap region of topoisomerase I (amino acids 215-433) which interacts with the region containing two closely spaced RRM domains of SF2/ASF (amino acids 1-194). The sites were defined by a set of pull-down experiments with isolated recombinant polypeptides. We also indicate that the novel site is responsible for the inhibition of DNA cleavage. The polypeptide containing tandem RRM domains inhibited DNA cleavage by topoisomerase I similarly as the complete SF2/ASF. Moreover, interaction between the tandem RRM domains and the cap region was not possible in the presence of DNA.     

Interaction between the N-terminus of human topoisomerase I and SV40 large T antigen.

We have attempted to identify human topoisomerase I-binding proteins in order to gain information regarding the cellular roles of this protein and the cytotoxic mechanisms of the anticancer drug camptothecin, which specifically targets topoisomerase I. In the course of this work we identified an interaction between the N-terminus of human topoisomerase I and the SV40 T antigen that is detectable in vitro using both affinity chromatography and co-immunoprecipitation. Additional results indicate that this interaction does not require intermediary DNA or stoichiometric quantities of other proteins. Furthermore, the interaction is detectable in vivo using a yeast two-hybrid assay. Two binding sites for T antigen are apparent on the topoisomerase I protein: one consisting of amino acids 1-139, the other present in the 383-765 region of the protein. Interestingly, nucleolin, which binds the 166-210 region of topoisomerase I, is able to bind an N-terminal fragment of topoisomerase I concurrently with T antigen. Taken together with our prior identification of nucleolin as a topoisomerase I-binding protein, the current results suggest that helicase-binding is a major role of the N-terminus of human topoisomerase I and that the resultant helicase-topoisomerase complex may function as a eukaryotic gyrase.     

The RNA recognition motif, a plastic RNA-binding platform to regulate post-transcriptional gene expression

The RNA recognition motif (RRM), also known as RNA-binding domain (RBD) or ribonucleoprotein domain (RNP) is one of the most abundant protein domains in eukaryotes. Based on the comparison of more than 40 structures including 15 complexes (RRM-RNA or RRM-protein), we reviewed the structure-function relationships of this domain. We identified and classified the different structural elements of the RRM that are important for binding a multitude of RNA sequences and proteins. Common structural aspects were extracted that allowed us to define a structural leitmotif of the RRM-nucleic acid interface with its variations. Outside of the two conserved RNP motifs that lie in the center of the RRM beta-sheet, the two external beta-strands, the loops, the C- and N-termini, or even a second RRM domain allow high RNA-binding affinity and specific recognition. Protein-RRM interactions that have been found in several structures reinforce the notion of an extreme structural versatility of this domain supporting the numerous biological functions of the RRM-containing proteins.     

A multifunctional RNA recognition motif in poly(A)-specific ribonuclease with cap and poly(A) binding properties

Poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN) is an oligomeric, processive and cap-interacting 3' exoribonuclease that efficiently degrades mRNA poly(A) tails. Here we show that the RNA recognition motif (RRM) of PARN harbors both poly(A) and cap binding properties, suggesting that the RRM plays an important role for the two critical and unique properties that are tightly associated with PARN activity, i.e. recognition and dependence on both the cap structure and poly(A) tail during poly(A) hydrolysis. We show that PARN and its RRM have micromolar affinity to the cap structure by using fluorescence spectroscopy and nanomolar affinity for poly(A) by using filter binding assay. We have identified one tryptophan residue within the RRM that is essential for cap binding but not required for poly(A) binding, suggesting that the cap- and poly(A)-binding sites associated with the RRM are both structurally and functionally separate from each other. RRM is one of the most commonly occurring RNA-binding domains identified so far, suggesting that other RRMs may have both cap and RNA binding properties just as the RRM of PARN.     

Specific protein domains mediate cooperative assembly of HuR oligomers on AU-rich mRNA-destabilizing sequences

The RNA-binding factor HuR is a ubiquitously expressed member of the Hu protein family that binds and stabilizes mRNAs containing AU-rich elements (AREs). Hu proteins share a common domain organization of two tandemly arrayed RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) near the N terminus, followed by a basic hinge domain and a third RRM near the C terminus. In this study, we engineered recombinant wild-type and mutant HuR proteins lacking affinity tags to characterize their ARE-binding properties. Using combinations of electrophoretic mobility shift and fluorescence anisotropy-based binding assays, we show that HuR can bind ARE substrates as small as 13 nucleotides with low nanomolar affinity, but forms cooperative oligomeric protein complexes on ARE substrates of at least 18 nucleotides in length. Analyses of deletion mutant proteins indicated that RRM3 does not contribute to high affinity recognition of ARE substrates, but is required for cooperative assembly of HuR oligomers on RNA. Finally, the hinge domain between RRM2 and RRM3 contributes significant binding energy to HuR.ARE complex formation in an ARE length-dependent manner. The hinge does not enhance RNA-binding activity by increased ion pair formation despite extensive positive charge within this region, and it does not thermodynamically stabilize protein folding. Together, the results define distinct roles for the HuR hinge and RRM3 domains in formation of cooperative HuR.ARE complexes in solution.     

Characterization of RNA-binding properties of three types of RNA-binding proteins in Anabaena sp. PPC 7120.

The Rbp proteins in cyanobacteria are RNA-binding proteins with a single RNA recognition motif or RRM. A comprehensive assembly of genomic data suggests that there are two major classes of Rbp proteins (classes I and II) that diverged before the diversification of cyanobacteria. Class I proteins are further classified into two types with or without a C-terminal glycine-rich domain. The results of selection from a random RNA pool suggest that RbpA1 (class I) has affinity to C-rich and G-rich sequences. In vitro RNA binding assay with homopolymers indicated that class II protein has low affinity to poly(G) in contrast with class I proteins. Site-specific mutagenesis analysis of the RRM in RbpA1 showed that the aromatic residues Tyr4 or Phe46 are important in RNA binding as well as maintenance of secondary structure. We also tested various truncated proteins lacking the C-terminal domain as well as point mutants. Most of these proteins exhibited decreased affinity to RNA. Circular dichroism analysis as well as chromatographic analysis showed that Tyr4 and Phe46 are also important in maintaining the structure of RbpA1 protein. The C-terminal glycine-rich domain itself does not contribute much to the RNA-binding, but Arg83 which is located close to the C-terminal end of RRM is important in the RNA-binding.     

The crystal structure of mouse Nup35 reveals atypical RNP motifs and novel homodimerization of the RRM domain

The nuclear pore complex mediates the transport of macromolecules across the nuclear envelope (NE). The vertebrate nuclear pore protein Nup35, the ortholog of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Nup53p, is suggested to interact with the NE membrane and to be required for nuclear morphology. The highly conserved region between vertebrate Nup35 and yeast Nup53p is predicted to contain an RNA-recognition motif (RRM) domain. Due to its low level of sequence homology with other RRM domains, the RNP1 and RNP2 motifs have not been identified in its primary structure. In the present study, we solved the crystal structure of the RRM domain of mouse Nup35 at 2.7 A resolution. The Nup35 RRM domain monomer adopts the characteristic betaalphabetabetaalphabeta topology, as in other reported RRM domains. The structure allowed us to locate the atypical RNP1 and RNP2 motifs. Among the RNP motif residues, those on the beta-sheet surface are different from those of the canonical RRM domains, while those buried in the hydrophobic core are highly conserved. The RRM domain forms a homodimer in the crystal, in accordance with analytical ultracentrifugation experiments. The beta-sheet surface of the RRM domain, with its atypical RNP motifs, contributes to homodimerization mainly by hydrophobic interactions: the side-chain of Met236 in the beta4 strand of one Nup35 molecule is sandwiched by the aromatic side-chains of Phe178 in the beta1 strand and Trp209 in the beta3 strand of the other Nup35 molecule in the dimer. This structure reveals a new homodimerization mode of the RRM domain.     

Apo raver1 structure reveals distinct RRM domain orientations

Raver1 is a multifunctional protein that modulates both alternative splicing and focal adhesion assembly by binding to the nucleoplasmic splicing repressor polypyrimidine tract protein (PTB) or to the cytoskeletal proteins vinculin and α‐actinin. The amino‐terminal region of raver1 has three RNA recognition motif (RRM1, RRM2, and RRM3) domains, and RRM1 interacts with the vinculin tail (Vt) domain and vinculin mRNA. We previously determined the crystal structure of the raver1 RRM1–3 domains in complex with Vt at 2.75 Å resolution. Here, we report crystal structure of the unbound raver1 RRM1–3 domains at 2 Å resolution. The apo structure reveals that a bound sulfate ion disrupts an electrostatic interaction between the RRM1 and RRM2 domains, triggering a large relative domain movement of over 30°. Superposition with other RNA‐bound RRM structures places the sulfate ion near the superposed RNA phosphate group suggesting that this is the raver1 RNA binding site. While several single and some tandem RRM domain structures have been described, to the best of our knowledge, this is the second report of a three‐tandem RRM domain structure.     

The solution structure of REF2-I reveals interdomain interactions and regions involved in binding mRNA export factors and RNA

The RNA binding and export factor (REF) family of mRNA export adaptors are found in several nuclear protein complexes including the spliceosome, TREX, and exon junction complexes. They bind RNA, interact with the helicase UAP56/DDX39, and are thought to bridge the interaction between the export factor TAP/NXF1 and mRNA. REF2-I consists of three domains, with the RNA recognition motif (RRM) domain positioned in the middle. Here we dissect the interdomain interactions of REF2-I and present the solution structure of a functionally competent double domain (NM; residues 1-155). The N-terminal domain comprises a transient helix (N-helix) linked to the RRM by a flexible arm that includes an Arg-rich region. The N-helix, which is required for REF2-I function in vivo, overlaps the highly conserved REF-N motif and, together with the adjacent Arg-rich region, interacts transiently with the RRM. RNA interacts with REF2-I through arginine-rich regions in its N- and C-terminal domains, but we show that it also interacts weakly with the RRM. The mode of interaction is unusual for an RRM since it involves loops L1 and L5. NMR signal mapping and biochemical analysis with NM indicate that DDX39 and TAP interact with both the N and RRM domains of REF2-I and show that binding of these proteins and RNA will favor an open conformation for the two domains. The proximity of the RNA, TAP, and DDX39 binding sites on REF2-I suggests their binding may be mutually exclusive, which would lead to successive ligand binding events in the course of mRNA export.     

The RRM domain in GW182 proteins contributes to miRNA-mediated gene silencing

Proteins of the GW182 family interact with Argonaute proteins and are required for miRNA-mediated gene silencing. These proteins contain two structural domains, an ubiquitin-associated (UBA) domain and an RNA recognition motif (RRM), embedded in regions predicted to be unstructured. The structure of the RRM of Drosophila melanogaster GW182 reveals that this domain adopts an RRM fold, with an additional C-terminal α-helix. The helix lies on the β-sheet surface, generally used by these domains to bind RNA. This, together with the absence of aromatic residues in the conserved RNP1 and RNP2 motifs, and the lack of general affinity for RNA, suggests that the GW182 RRM does not bind RNA. The domain may rather engage in protein interactions through an unusual hydrophobic cleft exposed on the opposite face of the β-sheet. We further show that the GW182 RRM is dispensable for P-body localization and for interaction of GW182 with Argonaute-1 and miRNAs. Nevertheless, its deletion impairs the silencing activity of GW182 in a miRNA target-specific manner, indicating that this domain contributes to silencing. The conservation of structural and surface residues suggests that the RRM domain adopts a similar fold with a related function in insect and vertebrate GW182 family members.     

Allosteric regulation of human poly(A)-specific ribonuclease by cap and potassium ions

Poly(A)-specific ribonuclease (PARN), a multi-domain dimeric enzyme, is a deadenylase in higher vertebrates and plants with the unique property of cap-dependent catalysis and processivity. We found that PARN is an allosteric enzyme, and potassium ions and the cap analogue were effectors with binding sites located at the RRM domain. The binding of K⁺ to the entire RRM domain led to an increase of substrate-binding affinity but a decrease in the cooperativity of the substrate-binding site, while the binding of the cap analogue decreased both the catalytic efficiency and the substrate-binding affinity. The dissimilar kinetic properties of the enzymes with and without the entire RRM domain suggested that the RRM domain played a central role in the allosteric communications of PARN regulation. The allostery is proposed to be important to the multi-level regulation of PARN to achieve precise control of the mRNA poly(A) tail length.     

Two separate conserved domains of eukaryotic DNA topoisomerase I bind to each other and reconstitute enzymatic activity

The two-hybrid system was used to identify proteins that interact with the central conserved domain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA topoisomerase I. Several different C-terminal domain-containing fragments of topoisomerase I, none of which overlapped with the central domain, were identified as specific interacting polypeptides. Coexpression of these two domains in yeast partially complemented the growth defects of top1-top2 ^ts and top1-hpr1 mutants. Moreover, an in vitro assay showed that some topoisomerase I enzymatic activity was restored to these mutants. The results demonstrate that the central domain of topoisomerase I interacts with the C-terminal domain of the protein and that these two domains reconstitute enzymatic activity in vivo, even when expressed as separate polypeptides. Received: 19 January 1998; in revised form: 3 March 1998 / Accepted: 7 April 1998     

Multifunctional G-Rich and RRM-Containing Domains of TbRGG2 Perform Separate yet Essential Functions in Trypanosome RNA Editing

Efficient editing of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial RNAs involves the actions of multiple accessory factors. T. brucei RGG2 (TbRGG2) is an essential protein crucial for initiation and 3'-to-5' progression of editing. TbRGG2 comprises an N-terminal G-rich region containing GWG and RG repeats and a C-terminal RNA recognition motif (RRM)-containing domain. Here, we perform in vitro and in vivo separation-of-function studies to interrogate the mechanism of TbRGG2 action in RNA editing. TbRGG2 preferentially binds preedited mRNA in vitro with high affinity attributable to its G-rich region. RNA-annealing and -melting activities are separable, carried out primarily by the G-rich and RRM domains, respectively. In vivo, the G-rich domain partially complements TbRGG2 knockdown, but the RRM domain is also required. Notably, TbRGG2's RNA-melting activity is dispensable for RNA editing in vivo. Interactions between TbRGG2 and MRB1 complex proteins are mediated by both G-rich and RRM-containing domains, depending on the binding partner. Overall, our results are consistent with a model in which the high-affinity RNA binding and RNA-annealing activities of the G-rich domain are essential for RNA editing in vivo. The RRM domain may have key functions involving interactions with the MRB1 complex and/or regulation of the activities of the G-rich domain.