Impedance-based analysis of mu opioid receptor signaling and underlying mechanisms

The mu opioid receptor is a G-protein coupled receptor able to signal through the Gα_i/o class of G-protein and β-arrestin pathways, stimulating down-stream effector pathways. Signaling bias occurs when different receptor agonists lead to different signaling outcomes. Traditionally these have been studied using end-point assays. Real-time cellular analysis platforms allow for the analysis of the holistic effects of receptor activation as an integrated output. While this allows for different ligands to be compared rapidly, the cellular mechanisms underlying the signal are not well described. Using an impedance based system, the impedance responses for two opioid ligands, morphine and DAMGO were examined.The impedance responses for these two agonists, while showing similar features, were distinct from each other. Some of the mechanisms underlying the mu opioid receptor coupled impedance changes were investigated. It was found that the response is a result of discrete cellular processes, including G-protein signaling and protein kinase phosphorylation.     

Induction of Cardiac Fibrosis by β-Blocker in G Protein-independent and G Protein-coupled Receptor Kinase 5/β-Arrestin2-dependent Signaling Pathways

G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) have long been known as receptors that activate G protein-dependent cellular signaling pathways. In addition to the G protein-dependent pathways, recent reports have revealed that several ligands called “biased ligands” elicit G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling through GPCRs (biased agonism). Several β-blockers are known as biased ligands. All β-blockers inhibit the binding of agonists to the β-adrenergic receptors. In addition to β-blocking action, some β-blockers are reported to induce cellular responses through G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling pathways. However, the physiological significance induced by the β-arrestin-dependent pathway remains much to be clarified in vivo. Here, we demonstrate that metoprolol, a β₁-adrenergic receptor-selective blocker, could induce cardiac fibrosis through a G protein-independent and β-arrestin2-dependent pathway. Metoprolol, a β-blocker, increased the expression of fibrotic genes responsible for cardiac fibrosis in cardiomyocytes. Furthermore, metoprolol induced the interaction between β₁-adrenergic receptor and β-arrestin2, but not β-arrestin1. The interaction between β₁-adrenergic receptor and β-arrestin2 by metoprolol was impaired in the G protein-coupled receptor kinase 5 (GRK5)-knockdown cells. Metoprolol-induced cardiac fibrosis led to cardiac dysfunction. However, the metoprolol-induced fibrosis and cardiac dysfunction were not evoked in β-arrestin2- or GRK5-knock-out mice. Thus, metoprolol is a biased ligand that selectively activates a G protein-independent and GRK5/β-arrestin2-dependent pathway, and induces cardiac fibrosis. This study demonstrates the physiological importance of biased agonism, and suggests that G protein-independent and β-arrestin-dependent signaling is a reason for the diversity of the effectiveness of β-blockers.     

How do chemokines navigate neutrophils to the target site: Dissecting the structural mechanisms and signaling pathways

Chemokines play crucial roles in combating microbial infection and initiating tissue repair by recruiting neutrophils in a timely and coordinated manner. In humans, no less than seven chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL2, CXCL3, CXCL5, CXCL6, CXCL7, and CXCL8) and two receptors (CXCR1 and CXCR2) mediate neutrophil functions but in a context dependent manner. Neutrophil-activating chemokines reversibly exist as monomers and dimers, and their receptor binding triggers conformational changes that are coupled to G-protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways. G-protein signaling activates a variety of effectors including Ca²⁺ channels and phospholipase C. β-arrestin serves as a multifunctional adaptor and is coupled to several signaling hubs including MAP kinase and tyrosine kinase pathways. Both G-protein and β-arrestin signaling pathways play important non-overlapping roles in neutrophil trafficking and activation. Functional studies have established many similarities but distinct differences for a given chemokine and between chemokines at the level of monomer vs. dimer, CXCR1 vs. CXCR2 activation, and G-protein vs. β-arrestin pathways. We propose that two forms of the ligand binding two receptors and activating two signaling pathways enables fine-tuned neutrophil function compared to a single form, a single receptor, or a single pathway. We summarize the current knowledge on the molecular mechanisms by which chemokine monomers/dimers activate CXCR1/CXCR2 and how these interactions trigger G-protein/β-arrestin-coupled signaling pathways. We also discuss current challenges and knowledge gaps, and likely advances in the near future that will lead to a better understanding of the relationship between the chemokine-CXCR1/CXCR2-G-protein/β-arrestin axis and neutrophil function.     

Prokineticin receptors interact unselectively with several G protein subtypes but bind selectively to β-arrestin 2

Prokineticin 1 (pk1) and prokineticin 2 (pk2) interact with two structurally related G-protein coupled receptors, prokineticin receptor 1 (PKR1) and prokineticin receptor 2 (PKR2). Cellular signalling studies show that the activated receptors can evoke Ca²⁺-mobilization, pertussis toxin-sensitive ERK phosphorylation, and intracellular cAMP accumulation, which suggests the partecipation of several G protein subtypes, such as G_q/11, G_i/o and G_s. However, direct interactions with these transduction proteins have not been studied yet. Here we measured by bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) the association of PKR1 and PKR2 with different heterotrimeric Gα proteins in response to pk1 and pk2 activation. Using host-cell lines carrying gene deletions of Gα_q/11 or Gα_s, and pertussis toxin treatment to abolish the receptor interactions with Gα_i/o, we determined that both receptors could couple with comparable efficiency to G_q/11 and G_i/o, but far less efficiently to G_s or other pertussis toxin-insensitive G proteins. We also used BRET methodology to assess the association of prokineticin receptors with β-arrestin isoforms. Fluorescent versions of the isoforms were transfected both in HEK293 cells and in double KO β-arrestin 1/2 mouse fibroblasts, to study receptor interaction with the reconstituted individual β-arrestins without background expression of the endogenous genes. Both receptors formed stable BRET-emitting complexes with β-arrestin 2 but not with β-arrestin 1, indicating strong selectivity for the former. In all the studied transducer interactions and in both receptors, pk2 was more potent than pk1 in promoting receptor binding to transduction proteins.     

Differential tissue and ligand-dependent signaling of GPR109A receptor: Implications for anti-atherosclerotic therapeutic potential

Until recently, the anti-atherosclerotic effects of niacin were attributed primarily to its lipid modification properties mediated by adipocyte G-protein coupled receptor GPR109A, though recent studies have raised significant doubts about this mechanism. In fact, in rodents it has recently been demonstrated that niacin inhibits progression of atherosclerosis through actions on immune cells, particularly via macrophage-expressed GPR109A, independent of lipid-modifying properties. Here, we studied GPR109A signal transduction in human Langerhans cells, macrophages and adipocytes. We find that the consequences of receptor activation are profoundly influenced by cellular context and that ligand-biased signaling significantly impacts functionally relevant signaling. In Langerhans cells, niacin initiates GPR109A-mediated signaling pathways (Erk1/2 and Ca^2 +) responsible for the release of vasodilatory prostanoids, while the synthetic GPR109A agonist MK-0354 fails to elicit any signaling, providing a mechanistic basis for the latter compound's inability to cause flushing. While GPR109A mediates inhibition of cAMP in adipocytes, in macrophages GPR109A signaling via G_βγ subunits results in paradoxical augmentation of intracellular cAMP levels. Also, in macrophages niacin and GPR109A full agonists induce Erk1/2 and Ca^2 + signaling, release of prostanoids, upregulation of cholesterol transporters ABCA1 and ABCG1 and stimulation of reverse cholesterol transport in GPR109A dependent manner. A mechanism is presented in which signals from the autocrine action of released prostanoids and G_i protein mediated cAMP augmentation are integrated leading to modulation of reverse cholesterol transport regulatory components. These studies provide key insights into mechanisms by which GPR109A may influence cholesterol efflux in macrophages; a process that may be at least partially responsible for niacin's anti-atherosclerotic activity. MK-0354 does not induce niacin-like GPR109A signaling in macrophages, suggesting that biased agonists devoid of the flushing side-effect may also lack properties required for macrophage-mediated anti-atherosclerotic effects.     

Src homology 2 (SH2) domain containing protein tyrosine phosphatase-1 (SHP-1) dephosphorylates VEGF Receptor-2 and attenuates endothelial DNA synthesis, but not migration*

Background

Sustained agonist-promoted ubiquitination of β-arrestin has been correlated with increased stability of the GPCR – β-arrestin complex. Moreover, abrogation of β-arrestin ubiquitination has been reported to inhibit receptor internalization with minimal effects on receptor degradation.

Results

Herein we report that agonist activation of M₁ mAChRs produces a sustained β-arrestin ubiquitination but no stable co-localization with β-arrestin. In contrast, sustained ubiquitination of β-arrestin by activation of M₂ mAChRs does result in stable co-localization between the M₂ mAChR and β-arrestin. Internalization of receptors was unaffected by proteasome inhibitors, but down-regulation was significantly reduced, suggesting a role for the ubiquitination machinery in promoting down-regulation of the receptors. Given the ubiquitination status of β-arrestin following agonist treatment, we sought to determine the effects of β-arrestin ubiquitination on M₁ and M₂ mAChR down-regulation. A constitutively ubiquitinated β-arrestin 2 chimera in which ubiquitin is fused to the C-terminus of β-arrestin 2 (YFP-β-arrestin 2-Ub) significantly increased agonist-promoted down-regulation of both M₁ and M₂ mAChRs, with the effect substantially higher on the M₂ mAChR. Based on this observation, we were interested in examining the effects of disruption of potential ubiquitination sites in the β-arrestin sequence on receptor down-regulation. Agonist-promoted internalization of the M₂ mAChR was not affected by expression of β-arrestin lysine mutants lacking putative ubiquitination sites, β-arrestin 2^{K18R, K107R, K108R, K207R, K296R}, while down-regulation and stable co-localiztion of the receptor with this β-arrestin lysine mutant were significantly reduced. Interestingly, expression of β-arrestin 2^{K18R, K107R, K108R, K207R, K296R} increased the agonist-promoted down-regulation of the M₁ mAChR but did not result in a stable co-localiztion of the receptor with this β-arrestin lysine mutant.

Conclusion

These findings indicate that ubiquitination of β-arrestin has a distinct role in the differential trafficking and degradation of M₁ and M₂ mAChRs.     

Differential signaling properties at the kappa opioid receptor of 12-epi-salvinorin A and its analogues

The kappa opioid receptor (KOPR) has been identified as a potential drug target to prevent or alter the course of mood, anxiety and addictive disorders or reduce response to stress. In a search for highly potent and selective KOPR partial agonists as pharmacological tools, we have modified 12-epi-salvinorin A, a compound which we have previously observed to be a KOPR partial agonist. Five analogues of 12-epi-salvinorin A were synthesized and their effects on G protein activation as well as β-arrestin2 recruitment were evaluated. Only 12-epi-salvinorin A (1) partially activated signaling through G proteins, yet acted as a full agonist in the β-arrestin 2 DiscoveRx assay. Other salvinorin analogues tested in these functional assays were full agonists in both assays of KOPR activation. By comparison, the non-selective opioid ligand nalbuphine, known to be a partial agonist for G-protein activation, was also a partial agonist for the β-arrestin mediated signaling pathway activated through KOPR.     

Complementary roles of the DRY motif and C-terminus tail of GPCRS for G protein coupling and beta-arrestin interaction

β-arrestin mediates the desensitization of GPCRs and acts as an adaptor molecule to recruit the receptor complex to clathrin-rich regions. Class-A GPCRs subsequently dissociate from β-arrestin but class-B GPCRs internalize with β-arrestin in the endocytic vesicles. Here the dopamine D₂ and D₃ receptors, which have similar structural features but different intracellular trafficking properties, were used in an attempt to better understand the structural requirements for the classification of GPCRs. The C-terminus tail of the vasopressin type-2 receptor was added to the ends of D₂R and D₃R to increase their affinity to β-arrestin. A point mutation was introduced into the DRY motif to change their basal activation levels. Among a battery of constructs in which the C-terminus tail and/or DRY motif was altered, class-B behavior was observed with the constructs whose affinities for β-arrestin were increased complementarily and their signaling was either maintained or regained. In conclusion, the DRY motif and C-terminal tail of the GPCRs determine complementarily their intracellular trafficking behavior by regulating the affinity to β-arrestin and G protein coupling.     

Roles of G protein and beta-arrestin in dopamine D2 receptor-mediated ERK activation

ERK activation by dopamine D₂ receptor (D₂R) has been extensively characterized in various cell types including brain tissues. However, the involvement of β-arrestin in the D₂R-mediated ERK activation is not clear yet. Three different strategies were employed in this study to determine the roles of G protein or β-arrestin in D₂R-mediated ERK activation. The cellular level of β-arrestins was reduced by RNA interference and pertussis toxin-insensitive Gi proteins were used to identify the G protein involved. Finally point mutations of D₂R in which coupling with G protein was abolished but the interaction with β-arrestin was increased, were employed to determine whether the affinity between D₂R and β-arrestin is a critical factor for β-arrestin-mediated ERK activation. Our results show that G_i2 protein is involved in D₂R-mediated ERK activation but β-arrestins are either not involved or play minor role.     

Functional selectivity of adenosine A1 receptor ligands?

The concept of functional selectivity offers great potential for the development of drugs that selectively activate a specific intracellular signaling pathway. During the last few years, it has become possible to systematically analyse compound libraries on G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) for this ‘biased’ form of signaling. We screened over 800 compounds targeting the class of adenosine A₁ receptors using a β-arrestin-mediated signaling assay in U2OS cells as a G protein-independent readout for GPCR activation. A selection of compounds was further analysed in a G protein-mediated GTPγS assay. Additionally, receptor affinity of these compounds was determined in a radioligand binding assay with the agonist [³H]CCPA. Of all compounds tested, only LUF5589 9 might be considered as functionally selective for the G protein-dependent pathway, particularly in view of a likely overestimation of β-arrestin signaling in the U2OS cells. Altogether, our study shows that functionally selective ligands for the adenosine A₁ receptor are rare, if existing at all. A thorough analysis of biased signaling on other GPCRs also reveals that only very few compounds can be considered functionally selective. This might indicate that the concept of functional selectivity is less common than speculated.     

β-拘留蛋白2的活性调控机制

β-拘留蛋白2(β-arrestin2)是arrestins家族的一个成员,广泛表达于全身组织,其不仅可以调节大多数G蛋白偶联受体(G-protein coupled receptors, GPCRs)的脱敏、内化,还能调节多种非GPCRs的内化,或作为支架蛋白质参与MAPK、PI3K/AKT等信号通路。越来越多的研究发现,β-arrestin2在肿瘤、自身免疫性疾病、纤维化疾病、心血管疾病、代谢性疾病等多种疾病进展过程中表达异常,提示其可能在疾病的病理过程中发挥重要的调控作用。β-arrestin2功能的发挥不仅与其在细胞中的表达水平有关,更依赖于对其活性的调控。但对于β-arrestin2的活性如何被调控,以及其活性如何影响其生物学功能的关注较少。近年来,陆续有研究报道了β-arrestin2可发生磷酸化、泛素化、SUMO化、S-亚硝基化等翻译后修饰,探讨了其翻译后修饰的可能位点,并发现翻译后修饰可影响β-arrestin2的细胞定位、调节受体内吞的作用、β-arrestin2与信号分子的相互作用及下游信号通路,对了解β-arrestin2活性调控在细胞中的作用具有重要意义。本文在...     

Functional role of the conserved proline in helix 6 of the human bradykinin B2 receptor

Pro258 in transmembrane domain (TMD) 6 of the bradykinin (BK) B₂ receptor (B₂R) is highly conserved among G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Using mutagenesis, we show that Pro258 is required for normal trafficking of the receptor to the plasma membrane and that mutation of Pro258 to Ala or Leu but not Gly, enhances BK efficacy to induce receptor activation. Furthermore, P258A mutation suppresses the constitutive activity of a constitutively activated N113A-B₂R mutant but preserves the antagonist to agonist efficacy shift previously observed on the N113A single mutant. Our data suggest that Pro258 in TMD6 is required for agonist-independent activation of the B₂R and that straightening of TMD6 at the Pro-kink might favor G-protein coupling. It is also shown that Asn113 is a contact point of BK interaction and it is proposed that the release of a TMD3-TMD6 interaction involving Asn113 is crucial for the efficacy shift from antagonism toward agonism.     

Closing Remarks

Abstract

Receptor phosphorylation is a key step in the process of rapid desensitization. β-Adrenergic receptor kinase is a specific receptor kinase that is known to phosphorylate and induce desensitization of several G-coupled synaptic receptors only when they are occupied by their agonists. We recently cloned human βARK cDNA and reported high levels of βARK expression in human peripheral blood leukocytes, also providing the first evidence for its possible functional role in these cells. Complete homologous receptor desensitization by βARK requires an additional cytosolic factor, called β-arrestin. In the present study, we have cloned a 212 bp fragment of the human β-arrestin cDNA to perform a comparative analysis of βARK and β-arrestin mRNA expression in various human cell types. We found that also β-arrestin mRNA is abundant in non-innervated tissues and cells. The fact that the entire machinery for G-coupled receptor desensitization is highly expressed in these cells further supports the idea that βARK may regulate non-synaptic as well as synaptic receptors.     

Structural insight into the binding complex: β-arrestin/CCR5 complex

The chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) belongs to the superfamily of serpentine G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The DRY motif (Asp, Arg, Tyr) of the intracellular loop 2 (ICL2), which is highly conserved in the GPCRs has been shown to be essential for the stability of folding of CCR5 and the interaction with β-arrestin. But the molecular mechanism by which it recognizes and interacts with β-arrestin has not been elucidated. In the present study, we described the active state of the β-arrestin structure using normal mode analysis and characterized the binding cleft of CCR5-ICL2 with β-arrestin using SABRE© docking tool and molecular dynamics simulation. Based on our computational results, we proposed a mode of binding between the ICL2 loop of CCR5 and β-arrestin structure, and modeled the energetically stable β-arrestin/CCR5 complex. In view of CCR5’s importance as a therapeutic target for the treatment of HIV, this observation provides novel insight into the β-arrestin/CCR5 pathway. As a result, the current computational study of the detailed β-arrestin/CCR5 binding complex could provide the rationale for the development of next generation of HIV peptide inhibitors as therapeutic agents.     

G protein coupled receptor transactivation: extending the paradigm to include serine/threonine kinase receptors

The current paradigm of G protein coupled receptor signaling involves a classical pathway being the activation of phospholipase C and the generation of 1,4,5-inositol trisphosphate, signaling through β-arrestin scaffold molecules and the transactivation of tyrosine kinase growth factor receptors. Transactivation greatly expands the range of signaling pathways and responses attributable to the receptor. Recently it has been revealed that G protein coupled receptor agonists can also transactivate the serine/threonine kinase cell surface receptor for transforming growth factor-β (Alk5). This leads to the generation of carboxyl terminal phosphorylated Smad2 which is the immediate downstream product of the activated Alk5. Thus, the current paradigm of G protein coupled signaling can be expanded to include the transactivation of the serine kinase receptor Alk5. These insights expand the possibilities for outcomes of therapeutically targeting GPCRs where more substantive and prolonged actions such as the synthesis of extracellular matrix may be affected.     

Activation of Mu Opioid Receptors Sensitizes Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid Type 1 (TRPV1) via β-Arrestin-2-Mediated Cross-Talk

The transient receptor potential family V1 channel (TRPV1) is activated by multiple stimuli, including capsaicin, acid, endovanilloids, and heat (>42C). Post-translational modifications to TRPV1 result in dynamic changes to the sensitivity of receptor activation. We have previously demonstrated that β-arrestin2 actively participates in a scaffolding mechanism to inhibit TRPV1 phosphorylation, thereby reducing TRPV1 sensitivity. In this study, we evaluated the effect of β-arrestin2 sequestration by G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) on thermal and chemical activation of TRPV1. Here we report that activation of mu opioid receptor by either morphine or DAMGO results in β-arrestin2 recruitment to mu opioid receptor in sensory neurons, while activation by herkinorin does not. Furthermore, treatment of sensory neurons with morphine or DAMGO stimulates β-arrestin2 dissociation from TRPV1 and increased sensitivity of the receptor. Conversely, herkinorin treatment has no effect on TRPV1 sensitivity. Additional behavioral studies indicate that GPCR-driven β-arrestin2 sequestration plays an important peripheral role in the development of thermal sensitivity. Taken together, the reported data identify a novel cross-talk mechanism between GPCRs and TRPV1 that may contribute to multiple clinical conditions.     

Activation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway by a Gq/11-coupled muscarinic receptor is independent of receptor internalization

A number of recent studies have demonstrated an essential role for receptor endocytosis in the activation of the mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, Erk-1 and Erk-2 (extracellular activated protein kinases 1 and 2), by growth factor receptors and the G-protein coupled beta2-adrenergic receptor. Because ligand-mediated receptor endocytosis and activation of the MAP kinase pathway are common phenomena among G-protein coupled receptors, it has been suggested that the essential role of endocytosis in MAP kinase activation identified for the beta2-adrenergic receptor may be universal for all G-protein coupled receptors (Daaka,Y., Luttrell, L. M., Ahn, S., Della Rocca, G. J., Ferguson, S. S. G., Caron, M. G., and Lefkowitz, R. J. (1998) J. Biol. Chem. 273, 685-688). We tested this hypothesis using the Gq/11-coupled m3-muscarinic receptor expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells and an m3-muscarinic receptor mutant that does not undergo endocytosis. We demonstrate that inhibition of endocytosis by concanavalin A and cytochalasin D does not affect the ability of the wild type m3-muscarinic receptor to activate Erk-1/2. Furthermore, the mutant m3-muscarinic receptor that is unable to undergo endocytosis, activates the MAP kinase pathway in an identical manner to the wild type receptor. We conclude that receptor endocytosis is not universally essential for MAP kinase activation by G-protein coupled receptors. We discuss the possibility that the differential roles played by endocytosis in MAP kinase activation between various receptor subtypes may be linked to the mechanism of upstream activation of Raf-1.