Effects of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide on serum uric acid levels and blood pressure in hypertensive patients

The effect of a mixed formulation of 50 mg losartan (LOS) and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on blood pressure and the uric acid metabolism was analyzed in 73 patients who switched to this formulation from other antihypertensive drugs. Eight patients who switched to the formulation from the regular dose of renin-angiotensin (RA) inhibitor (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB] or angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor) only showed a significant decrease in blood pressure, from 156.9 ± 14.1/88.6 ± 9.7 mmHg to 128.3 ± 16.0/76.1 ±10.7 mmHg (p = 0.007), and a significant increase in serum uric acid levels, from 5.2 ± 1.1 mg/dL to 6.8 ± 0.7 mg/dL (p = 0.02). In the other 50 patients who switched from a combination of the regular dose of RA inhibitor and calcium channel blocker (CCB), their blood pressure significantly increased, from 126.0 ± 13.8/72.0 ± 10.0 mmHg to 132.5 ± 16.4/76.5 ± 11.3 mmHg (p = 0.02), and their serum uric acid levels also significantly increased, from 5.6 ± 1.1 mg/dL to 6.1 ± 1.3 mg/dL (p = 0.0002). Considering that guidelines recommend using antihypertensive therapies that do not lead to an increase in serum uric acid levels, we conclude that using the ARB/HCTZ combination is less suitable than the regular dose of the ARB/CCB combination due to its effect on hypertension and serum uric acid levels.     

The combination of atenolol and amlodipine is better than their monotherapy for preventing end‐organ damage in different types of hypertension in rats

Combinations therapy is often used in hypertensive patients whether combination therapy is necessary for preventing end‐organ damage is not known. The objective of this study was to determine in four different hypertensive animal models the necessity of adding the calcium channel blocker amlodipine to therapy with the ß‐blocker atenolol to modulate end‐organ damage. Spontaneously hypertensive rats, DOCA‐salt hypertensive rats, two‐kidney, one‐clip renovascular hypertensive rats and Lyon genetically hypertensive rats were used to study this objective. These animal models have different sensitivities to atenolol and amlodipine. The dosages of therapy employed were 10 mg/kg atenolol alone, 1 mg/kg amlodipine, 10 mg atenolol + 1 mg/kg amlodipine and 5 mg/kg atenolol+0.5 mg/kg amlodipine. BP was continuously recorded in all animals. After determination of baroreflex sensitivity, rats were sacrificed for end‐organ damage evaluation. The combination of amlodipine and atenolol had a synergistic inhibitory effect on blood pressure and blood pressure variability, and end‐organ damage as compared with monotherapy with atenolol or amlodipine in all animal models. Baroreflex sensitivity also improved with the combination therapy more than with monotherapy. In conclusion, atenolol and amlodipine combination exerts a superior effect on blood pressure, blood pressure variability, baroreflex sensitivity and end‐organ damage. The superior effect of the combination was observed in all four models of hypertension.     

Effects of Losartan/Hydrochlorothiazide on Serum Uric Acid Levels and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Patients

The effect of a mixed formulation of 50 mg losartan (LOS) and 12.5 mg hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on blood pressure and the uric acid metabolism was analyzed in 73 patients who switched to this formulation from other antihypertensive drugs. Eight patients who switched to the formulation from the regular dose of renin-angiotensin (RA) inhibitor (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB] or angiotensin-converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor) only showed a significant decrease in blood pressure, from 156.9 ± 14.1/88.6 ± 9.7 mmHg to 128.3 ± 16.0/76.1 ±10.7 mmHg (p = 0.007), and a significant increase in serum uric acid levels, from 5.2 ± 1.1 mg/dL to 6.8 ± 0.7 mg/dL (p = 0.02). In the other 50 patients who switched from a combination of the regular dose of RA inhibitor and calcium channel blocker (CCB), their blood pressure significantly increased, from 126.0 ± 13.8/72.0 ± 10.0 mmHg to 132.5 ± 16.4/76.5 ± 11.3 mmHg (p = 0.02), and their serum uric acid levels also significantly increased, from 5.6 ± 1.1 mg/dL to 6.1 ± 1.3 mg/dL (p = 0.0002). Considering that guidelines recommend using antihypertensive therapies that do not lead to an increase in serum uric acid levels, we conclude that using the ARB/HCTZ combination is less suitable than the regular dose of the ARB/CCB combination due to its effect on hypertension and serum uric acid levels.     

Clinical data analysis of telmisartan for hypertension management in Indian population

It is of interest to evaluate the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical effectiveness, and safety of telmisartan as a monotherapy or as part of combination therapy in Indian adults (>18 years old) with hypertension. All patients were receiving telmisartan as monotherapy, or as a combination therapy for hypertension management. Demographics, risk factors, existing comorbidity, and ongoing medical therapies were retrieved from the patients’ medical records. A total of 8607 patients with hypertension (median age, 51.0 years) were part of the study. The gender distribution suggested, 5534(64.3%) patients were male, and 3073 (35.7%) were female patients. The excess salt intake (39.0%) was the most common risk factor according to the results. The analysis revealed telmisartan dual therapy (57.9%) as the most prescribed therapy, followed by monotherapy (32.5%), and triple therapy (9.6%). Further, telmisartan 40mg (21.3%) and telmisartan 40mg plus amlodipine 5mg (17.6%) were the most commonly prescribed therapies. The data suggested that only 17.2% of patients required dose titration. The mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (mmHg) were significantly decreased with monotherapy (mean change: 19.8 [15.1] mmHg and 8.8[8.2] mmHg), dual therapy (mean change: 23.7 [16.6] mmHg and 10.3[8.5] mmHg), and triple therapy (mean change: 28.6 [19.0] mmHg and 12.1[10.8] mmHg) after the treatment (P<0.001). A total of 98.4% of the patients were compliant, and 97.6% achieved the target blood pressure goal with telmisartan-based therapy. There were 157 adverse events reported altogether. The Physicians'' global evaluation of efficacy and tolerability showed the majority of the patients receiving telmisartan-based therapy on a good to excellent scale. Telmisartan used as a monotherapeutic agent or as a part of combination therapy was successful and effective in reducing blood pressure and achieving the blood pressure target. Irrespective of the patient’s age, duration, and stages of hypertension, the study resulted in a good to excellent scale in efficacy and tolerability in the Indian patients having hypertension.     

Resetting baroreceptors to a lower arterial pressure level by enalapril avoids baroreflex mediated activation of sympathetic nervous system by nifedipine.

Baroreceptor-unloading-mediated activation of sympathetic nervous system (SNS) by antihypertensive agents, such as dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCB), has been considered to compromise the beneficial effects of the therapy and lead to unsatisfying clinical outcome. The present study was aimed at finding a novel way of using CCB without activating SNS. In anaesthetized Wistar rats, baroreceptor-unloading-mediated reflex activation of SNS, as indicated by tachycardia and increase of plasma catecholamines, was observed after mean arterial pressure (MAP) was decreased by 15 mmHg during 4-h administration of nifedipine, a CCB. However an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), enalapril did not cause tachycardia or increase plasma catecholamine levels when it decreased MAP by 15 mmHg. After 100 min (supposedly baroreceptor resetting or adaptation to hypotension had occurred), enalapril infusion was gradually replaced by nifedipine infusion in 40 min. Nifedipine was infused for another 100 min, which kept the lowered MAP unchanged and did not activate SNS. In anaesthetized spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), baroreceptor-mediated reflex activation of SNS was observed after MAP was decreased by 25 mmHg during 4-h nifedipine administration. However enalapril did not cause tachycardia or increase plasma catecholamine levels when it decreased MAP by 25 mmHg. After 100 min, enalapril infusion was gradually replaced by nifedipine infusion in 40 min. Nifedipine was then infused for another 100 min, which kept the lowered MAP unchanged and did not activate SNS. The present study indicated that reflex activation of SNS caused by antihypertensive effect of CCB could be avoided if, prior to CCB administration, baroreceptors have been reset to a lower MAP by a drug that does not activate baroreceptor reflex.     

Vitamin supplementation and blood pressure in Type 2 diabetes

Diabet. Med. 29, 1253-1259 (2012) ABSTRACT: Aims Vitamin D levels are inversely related to blood pressure. Given that low sun exposure can create a greater reliance on dietary sources of vitamin D, we aimed to determine whether dietary vitamin D and blood pressure associations differ between periods of low and high sun exposure. Methods Dietary intake, vitamin supplementation, blood pressure, and anthropometric parameters were assessed each season for 1?year (174 adults with Type 2 diabetes). Separate linear regression models were constructed for high and low sun exposure periods to examine associations of systolic blood pressure with dietary vitamin D intake and vitamin supplement use (adjusted for age, gender, BMI, ethnicity, smoking, alcohol, physical activity, antihypertensive medication and nutrient intake). Robustness of findings was confirmed with within-subject repeated measures analysis, including an interaction term for sun exposure period. Results Vitamin D intake from food sources was low year-round and no conclusive association with blood pressure was identified during either period. Systolic blood pressure was 5.1?mmHg lower during the low sun exposure period (95% CI 0.5-9.7) in daily supplement users compared with non-users. The interaction term between supplement use and sun exposure period was significant (low sun exposure* no supplement, P?=?0.02). Systolic blood pressure was relatively stable in users (low and high sun exposure periods, respectively, mean?±?SE: 135.2?±?2.6?mmHg and 134.2?±?2.5?mmHg), but not in non-users (140.2?±?2.7?mmHg and 130.5?±?2.5?mmHg). Conclusions Vitamin supplementation may stabilize systolic blood pressure in adults with Type 2 diabetes across seasons.     

Calcium channel blockers, more than diuretics, enhance vascular protective effects of angiotensin receptor blockers in salt-loaded hypertensive rats

The combination therapy of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or with a diuretic is favorably recommended for the treatment of hypertension. However, the difference between these two combination therapies is unclear. The present work was undertaken to examine the possible difference between the two combination therapies in vascular protection. Salt-loaded stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSP) were divided into 6 groups, and they were orally administered (1) vehicle, (2) olmesartan, an ARB, (3) azelnidipine, a CCB, (4) hydrochlorothiazide, a diuretic, (5) olmesartan combined with azelnidipine, or (6) olmesartan combined with hydrochlorothiazide. Olmesartan combined with either azelnidipine or hydrochlorothiazide ameliorated vascular endothelial dysfunction and remodeling in SHRSP more than did monotherapy with either agent. However, despite a comparable blood pressure lowering effect between the two treatments, azelnidipine enhanced the amelioration of vascular endothelial dysfunction and remodeling by olmesartan to a greater extent than did hydrochlorothiazide in salt-loaded SHRSP. The increased enhancement by azelnidipine of olmesartan-induced vascular protection than by hydrochlorothiazide was associated with a greater amelioration of vascular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activation, superoxide, mitogen-activated protein kinase activation, and with a greater activation of the Akt/endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) pathway. These results provided the first evidence that a CCB potentiates the vascular protective effects of an ARB in salt-sensitive hypertension, compared with a diuretic, and provided a novel rationale explaining the benefit of the combination therapy with an ARB and a CCB.     

Regression of Glomerular and Tubulointerstitial Injuries by Dietary Salt Reduction with Combination Therapy of Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker and Calcium Channel Blocker in Dahl Salt-Sensitive Rats

A growing body of evidence indicates that renal tissue injuries are reversible. We investigated whether dietary salt reduction with the combination therapy of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB) plus calcium channel blocker (CCB) reverses renal tissue injury in Dahl salt-sensitive (DSS) hypertensive rats. DSS rats were fed a high-salt diet (HS; 4% NaCl) for 4 weeks. Then, DSS rats were given one of the following for 10 weeks: HS diet; normal-salt diet (NS; 0.5% NaCl), NS + an ARB (olmesartan, 10 mg/kg/day), NS + a CCB (azelnidipine, 3 mg/kg/day), NS + olmesartan + azelnidipine or NS + hydralazine (50 mg/kg/day). Four weeks of treatment with HS diet induced hypertension, proteinuria, glomerular sclerosis and hypertrophy, glomerular podocyte injury, and tubulointerstitial fibrosis in DSS rats. A continued HS diet progressed hypertension, proteinuria and renal tissue injury, which was associated with inflammatory cell infiltration and increased proinflammatory cytokine mRNA levels, NADPH oxidase activity and NADPH oxidase-dependent superoxide production in the kidney. In contrast, switching to NS halted the progression of hypertension, renal glomerular and tubular injuries. Dietary salt reduction with ARB or with CCB treatment further reduced blood pressure and partially reversed renal tissues injury. Furthermore, dietary salt reduction with the combination of ARB plus CCB elicited a strong recovery from HS-induced renal tissue injury including the attenuation of inflammation and oxidative stress. These data support the hypothesis that dietary salt reduction with combination therapy of an ARB plus CCB restores glomerular and tubulointerstitial injury in DSS rats.     

Antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of different monotherapies and combination therapies in young spontaneously hypertensive rats – A pilot study

Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are an established animal model for antihypertensive treatment. The aim of this pilot study was a systematic search for two lines of antihypertensive treatment – a monotherapy and a combination of two drugs – to be applied in a future study on old SHR. Originally, representatives of three drug classes recommended for antihypertensive therapy in humans should be applied, namely captopril (CAP) as an antagonist of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, nifedipine (NIF) as calcium channel blocker and propranolol (PROP) as β-adrenergic blocker. As we observed that PROP had been poorly ingested, all groups with PROP therapy were excluded from the study. CAP (60 mg kg^?1 d^-1), NIF (10 mg kg^?1 d^-1) or both were administered orally to seven-week-old SHR over 3 weeks. A further group of SHR received no treatment (SHR/CTRL). Age-matched normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats served as normotensive controls. We examined the effect of the antihypertensive therapies on systolic blood pressure, heart weight and on histological and biochemical markers of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis.CAP proved to be the most effective treatment reducing blood pressure and relative heart weight significantly compared to SHR/CTRL without reaching normotensive values. Beginning cardiac fibrosis observed in SHR/CTRL was completely abrogated with CAP treatment. Similar effects were achieved with a combination of CAP and NIF. CAP as monotherapy and CAP + NIF as combination therapy were chosen for the forthcoming study on old SHR.     

Antihypertensive and cardioprotective effects of different monotherapies and combination therapies in young spontaneously hypertensive rats – A pilot study

Spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) are an established animal model for antihypertensive treatment. The aim of this pilot study was a systematic search for two lines of antihypertensive treatment – a monotherapy and a combination of two drugs – to be applied in a future study on old SHR. Originally, representatives of three drug classes recommended for antihypertensive therapy in humans should be applied, namely captopril (CAP) as an antagonist of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, nifedipine (NIF) as calcium channel blocker and propranolol (PROP) as β-adrenergic blocker. As we observed that PROP had been poorly ingested, all groups with PROP therapy were excluded from the study. CAP (60 mg kg⁻¹ d^-1), NIF (10 mg kg⁻¹ d^-1) or both were administered orally to seven-week-old SHR over 3 weeks. A further group of SHR received no treatment (SHR/CTRL). Age-matched normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats served as normotensive controls. We examined the effect of the antihypertensive therapies on systolic blood pressure, heart weight and on histological and biochemical markers of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis.CAP proved to be the most effective treatment reducing blood pressure and relative heart weight significantly compared to SHR/CTRL without reaching normotensive values. Beginning cardiac fibrosis observed in SHR/CTRL was completely abrogated with CAP treatment. Similar effects were achieved with a combination of CAP and NIF. CAP as monotherapy and CAP + NIF as combination therapy were chosen for the forthcoming study on old SHR.Keyword: Young SHR, Antihypertensive therapy, Blood pressure monitoring, Cardiac hypertrophy, Cardiac fibrosis     

Dose‐ And Administration Time‐Dependent Effects Of Nifedipine Gits On Ambulatory Blood Pressure In Hypertensive Subjects

Previous chronotherapy studies have shown that the circadian pattern of blood pressure (BP) remains unchanged after either morning or evening dosing of several calcium channel blockers (CCB), including amlodipine, isradipine, verapamil, nitrendipine, and cilnidipine. This trial investigated the antihypertensive efficacy and safety profile of the slow‐release, once‐a‐day nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) formulation administered at different times with reference to the rest‐activity cycle of each participant. We studied 80 diurnally active subjects (36 men and 44 women), 52.1±10.7 yrs of age, with grade 1–2 essential hypertension, who were randomly assigned to receive nifedipine GITS (30 mg/day) as a monotherapy for eight weeks, either upon awakening in the morning or at bedtime at night. Patients with uncontrolled BP were up‐titrated to a higher dose, 60 mg/day nifedipine GITS, for an additional eight weeks. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring every 20 min during the day and every 30 min at night for 48 consecutive hours before and after therapy with either dose. The BP reduction after eight weeks of therapy with the lower dose of 30 mg/day was slightly, but not significantly, larger with bedtime dosing. The efficacy of 60 mg/day nifedipine GITS in non‐responders to the initial 30 mg/day dose was twice as great with bedtime as compared to morning dosing. Moreover, bedtime administration of nifedipine GITS reduced the incidence of edema as an adverse event by 91%, and the total number of all adverse events by 74% as compared to morning dosing (p=0.026). Independent of the time of day of administration, a single daily dose of 30 mg/day of nifedipine GITS provides full 24 h therapeutic coverage. The dose‐dependent increased efficacy and the markedly improved safety profile of bedtime as compared to morning administration of nifedipine GITS should be taken into account when prescribing this CCB in the treatment of essential hypertension.     

Effect of Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents on Blood Pressure in Pre-Dialysis Patients

Introduction

Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESA) are hypothesized to increase cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. One of the proposed mechanisms is the elevation of blood pressure (BP) by ESA. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether the use of ESA was associated with antihypertensive treatment and higher BP.

Materials and Methods

In this cohort 502 incident pre-dialysis patients were included who started specialized pre-dialysis care in 25 clinics in the Netherlands. Data on medication including ESA use and dose, co-morbidities and BP were routinely collected every 6 months. Antihypertensive treatment and BP were compared for patients with and without ESA at baseline. Differences in antihypertensive medication and BP during pre-dialysis care were estimated with linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

Results

At baseline, 95.6% of patients with ESA were treated with antihypertensive medication and 73.1% of patients without ESA. No relevant difference in BP was found. During pre-dialysis care patients with ESA used 0.77 (95% CI 0.63;0.91) more classes of antihypertensive drugs. The adjusted difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was −0.3 (95% CI −2.7;2.0) mmHg and in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was −1.0 (95% CI −2.1;0.3) mmHg for patients with ESA compared to patients without ESA. Adjusted SBP was 3.7 (95% CI −1.6;9.0) mmHg higher in patients with a high ESA dose compared to patients with a low ESA dose.

Conclusions

Our study confirms the hypertensive effect of ESA, since ESA treated patients received more antihypertensive agents. However, no relevant difference in BP was found between patients with and without ESA, thus the increase in BP seems to be controlled for by antihypertensive medication.     

Chronopharmacology of Captopril plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertension: Morning Versus Evening Dosing

Blood pressure follows a strong circadian rhythm in normotensive people and in patients with primary hypertension. This may have several implications for antihypertensive therapy, including the time of dosing. For this reason we studied the influence of different dosing times on the antihypertensive effect over 24 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We studied 13 male patients with moderate hypertension with controlled blood pressure over 12 months under a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. The dosage of the combination therapy was then halved and given as one evening and then as one morning dose, each for 3 weeks. The combination therapy given twice daily showed a good 24-h antihypertensive effect after 12 months of treatment. During the following 6 weeks the mean 24-h blood pressure did not increase under half dosage, irrespective of whether under evening or morning dosing. However, mean daytime values (systolic and diastolic) of ABPM were significantly higher with evening dosing when compared both with full dosage and with half dosage given in the morning. The mean arterial blood pressure over 24 h showed the same differences as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, whereas heart rate was not significantly different between the three therapeutic regimens. ABPM seems to be an ideal method for chronopharmacological investigations under everyday conditions. Our study demonstrated significant differences in daytime blood pressure but not in 24-h blood pressure between morning and evening dosing of a fixed antihypertensive combination therapy.     

Chronopharmacology of Captopril plus Hydrochlorothiazide in Hypertension: Morning Versus Evening Dosing

Blood pressure follows a strong circadian rhythm in normotensive people and in patients with primary hypertension. This may have several implications for antihypertensive therapy, including the time of dosing. For this reason we studied the influence of different dosing times on the antihypertensive effect over 24 h using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). We studied 13 male patients with moderate hypertension with controlled blood pressure over 12 months under a fixed combination of captopril and hydrochlorothiazide. The dosage of the combination therapy was then halved and given as one evening and then as one morning dose, each for 3 weeks. The combination therapy given twice daily showed a good 24-h antihypertensive effect after 12 months of treatment. During the following 6 weeks the mean 24-h blood pressure did not increase under half dosage, irrespective of whether under evening or morning dosing. However, mean daytime values (systolic and diastolic) of ABPM were significantly higher with evening dosing when compared both with full dosage and with half dosage given in the morning. The mean arterial blood pressure over 24 h showed the same differences as systolic and diastolic blood pressure, whereas heart rate was not significantly different between the three therapeutic regimens. ABPM seems to be an ideal method for chronopharmacological investigations under everyday conditions. Our study demonstrated significant differences in daytime blood pressure but not in 24-h blood pressure between morning and evening dosing of a fixed antihypertensive combination therapy.     

Choice of antihypertensive drug in the diabetic patient

The hypertensive patient with type 2 diabetes is especially at risk of adverse cardiovascular events. The United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) and Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) studies suggested that treatment to a lower target blood pressure resulted in better prevention of clinical disease in these patients. Most trials comparing antihypertensive drugs have shown only minimal differences between the various agents. The evidence from the trials suggests that diuretics, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, and the angiotensin-receptor antagonists (ARBs) will all successfully reduce adverse clinical events. The largest of the comparative hypertensive drug trials, the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT), demonstrated that a diuretic has a better hypotensive effect, and was more successful in preventing many aspects of cardiovascular disease compared with CCBs and ACE inhibitors. The importance of good blood pressure control and the general equivalence of antihypertensive drugs were again shown in the Valsartan Antihypertensive Long-term Use Evaluation (VALUE) trial, which compared an ARB with a CCB. Choice of antihypertensive agent should be individualized and guided by the presence of concomitant clinical disease and the need to protect any specific target organ system in the diabetic hypertensive. Diuretics, being potent hypotensive drugs with clearly demonstrated clinical benefit, should form part of the antihypertensive regimen of most diabetic hypertensives. ACE inhibitors and ARBs are especially useful in preventing nephropathy. Most patients will require a combination of antihypertensive drugs to achieve tight blood pressure control of under 130/80 mm Hg in the diabetic hypertensive. The clinician should concentrate on seeking this lower target blood pressure rather than be excessively concerned about which is the best antihypertensive agent.     

Blood Pressure Control with a Single-Pill Combination of Indapamide Sustained-Release and Amlodipine in Patients with Hypertension: The EFFICIENT Study

Objective

Despite antihypertensive treatment, most hypertensive patients still have high blood pressure (BP), notably high systolic blood pressure (SBP). The EFFICIENT study examines the efficacy and acceptability of a single-pill combination of sustained-release (SR) indapamide, a thiazide-like diuretic, and amlodipine, a calcium channel blocker (CCB), in the management of hypertension.

Methods

Patients who were previously uncontrolled on CCB monotherapy (BP≥140/90 mm Hg) or were previously untreated with grade 2 or 3 essential hypertension (BP≥160/100 mm Hg) received a single-pill combination tablet containing indapamide SR 1.5 mg and amlodipine 5 mg daily for 45 days, in this multicenter prospective phase 4 study. The primary outcome was mean change in BP from baseline; percentage of patients achieving BP control (BP<140/90 mm Hg) was a secondary endpoint. SBP reduction (ΔSBP) versus diastolic BP reduction (ΔDBP) was evaluated (ΔSBP/ΔDBP) from baseline to day 45. Safety and tolerability were also assessed.

Results

Mean baseline BP of 196 patients (mean age 52.3 years) was 160.2/97.9 mm Hg. After 45 days, mean SBP decreased by 28.5 mm Hg (95% CI, 26.4 to 30.6), while diastolic BP decreased by 15.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 14.5 to 16.7). BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) was achieved in 85% patients. ΔSBP/ΔDBP was 1.82 in the overall population. Few patients (n = 3 [2%]) reported side effects, and most (n = 194 [99%]) adhered to treatment.

Conclusion

In patients who were previously uncontrolled on CCB monotherapy or untreated with grade 2 or 3 hypertension, single-pill combination indapamide SR/amlodipine reduced BP effectively—especially SBP— over 45 days, and was safe and well tolerated.

Trial Registration

Clinical Trial Registry – India CTRI/2010/091/000114     

Aliskiren and Amlodipine in the Management of Essential Hypertension: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Background

Aliskiren is a novel renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor, the combination therapy of aliskiren and amlodipine for blood pressure control have been reported recently. The primary objective of this analysis is to review recently reported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare antihypertensive effects and adverse events between mono (amlodipine or aliskiren alone) and combination therapy of both medicines.

Methods

Databases for the search included Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Revman v5.0 statistical program was used to analyze the data. Weighted mean differences (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for the calculation of continuous data, and relative risk (RR) with a 95% CI was used for dichotomous data.

Results

We analyzed the data from 7 RCTs for a total of 6074 participants in this meta-analysis. We found that the aliskiren/amlodipine combination therapy had a stronger effect in lowering blood pressure as compared with the monotherapy using aliskiren (SBP: WMD = −10.42, 95% CI −13.03∼−7.82, P<0.00001; DBP: WMD = −6.60, 95% CI −7.22∼−5.97, P<0.00001) or amlodipine (SBP: WMD = −4.85, 95% CI −6.88∼−2.81, P<0.00001; DBP: WMD = −2.91, 95% CI −3.85∼−1.97, P<0.00001). No differences were found in terms of adverse events between combination therapy and monotherapy, except for the rates of peripheral edema and hypokalaemia which were significantly lower in the combination therapy than in the amlodipine monotherapy (RR = 0.78, 0.66∼0.92, P = 0.004; RR = 0.51, 0.27∼0.97, P = 0.04). Similar antihypertensive effects were found in both obese (body mass index > = 30 kg/m²) hypertensive and non-obese (body mass index <30 kg/m²) hypertensive patients. Moreover, there was no difference with the blood pressure lowering or adverse effects with regards to the combination therapy in both subgroups.

Conclusion

We found that aliskiren/amlodipine combination therapy provided a more effective blood pressure reduction than monotherapy with either drug without increase in the occurrence of adverse events.     

A study of replacement of timolol-pilocarpine with latanoprost in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of replacing current dual local therapy (timolol and pilocarpine) with latanoprost 0.005% in 71 pseudoexfoliation glaucoma patients with controlled intraocular pressure (IOP). 39 patients switched to latanoprost 0.005%) and 32 patients continued timolol-pilocarpine therapy. Mean diurnal (IOP) was measured at baseline, after 0.5, 1, 3 and 6 months of treatment. After 6 months 38 patients with latanoprost and 30 patients with timolol-pilocarpine had completed the study. At baseline the mean diurnal IOP was 20.4 +/- 2.0 mmHg for patients in latanoprost treatment group and 21.4 +/- 2.1 mmHg for patients in timolol-pilocarpine group. At the end of the study, after 6 months of treatment, the mean diurnal IOP values were 16.6 +/- 2.4 and 17.9 +/- 2.0 mmHg respectively. IOP was statistically significantly reduced from baseline (p < 0.001). The mean diurnal IOP change from baseline was -3.3 +/- 0.5 mmHg (mean +/- SEM, ANCOVA) for the patients treated with latanoprost and -3.2 +/- 0.4 mmHg for the patients treated with timolol + pilocarpine. This difference in IOP reduction between groups was not statistically significant (z = 0.69; p = 0.49). This study showed that combination therapy (timolol plus pilocarpine) in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma can effectively be replaced by latanoprost monotherapy.     

Comparison of the Effects on Ambulatory Blood Pressure of Awakening versus Bedtime Administration of Torasemide in Essential Hypertension

Torasemide is a high‐ceiling loop diuretic frequently used in the treatment of congestive heart failure, renal failure, and hypertension. Low doses of torasemide (2.5 to 5 mg/day) do not elevate 24 h natriuresis, and they constitute effective monotherapy for mild‐to‐moderate uncomplicated essential hypertension according to results based on clinic blood pressure (BP). However, there has yet to be a proper evaluation of its 24 h efficacy or potential dependency of effects according to the circadian time of treatment. Accordingly, this trial investigated the administration time‐dependent efficacy of torasemide in uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients. We studied a total of 113 grade 1 and 2 hypertensive patients, 51.7±10.6 yrs of age, randomly assigned to receive torasemide (5 mg/day) as a monotherapy either upon awakening or at bedtime. BP was measured by ambulatory monitoring for 48 consecutive hours before and after six weeks of treatment. The efficacy of torasemide was significantly greater with bedtime dosing (i.e., 14.8 and 9.5 mmHg reduction in the 24 h mean systolic and diastolic BP, respectively) as compared with morning dosing upon awakening (i.e., 6.4 and 3.4 mmHg reduction in mean systolic and diastolic BP; p<0.001 between the two treatment‐time groups). The percentage of patients with controlled ambulatory BP after treatment was also higher after bedtime treatment (64 vs. 23%; p<0.001). Safety and tolerability were comparable between the two treatment‐time groups. A dose of 5 mg/day torasemide is more effective for BP reduction for uncomplicated essential hypertensive patients when ingested at bedtime than in the morning upon arising. The difference in antihypertensive efficacy as a function of the circadian dosing‐time of torasemide here documented should be taken into account when prescribing this loop diuretic to treat essential hypertensive patients.     

Progress report on the first sub-Saharan trial of newer versus older antihypertensive drugs in native black patients

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The epidemic surge in hypertension in sub-Saharan Africa is not matched by clinical trials of antihypertensive agents in Black patients recruited in this area of the world. We mounted the Newer versus Older Antihypertensive agents in African Hypertensive patients (NOAAH) trial to compare, in native African patients, a single-pill combination of newer drugs, not involving a diuretic, with a combination of older drugs including a diuretic. METHODS: Patients aged 30 to 69 years with uncomplicated hypertension (140 to 179/90 to 109 mmHg) and [less than or equal to]2 associated risk factors are eligible. After a four week run-in period off treatment, 180 patients have to be randomized to once daily bisoprolol/hydrochlorothiazide 5/6.25 mg (R) or amlodipine/valsartan 5/160 mg (E). To attain blood pressure <140/<90 mmHg during six months, the doses of bisoprolol and amlodipine should be increased to 10 mg/day with the possible addition of up to 2 g/day alpha-methyldopa. RESULTS: At the time of writing of this progress report, of 206 patients enrolled in the run-in period, 140 had been randomized. At randomization, the R and E groups were similar (P [greater than or equal to]0.11) with respect to mean age (50.7 years), body mass index (28.2 kg/m2), blood pressure (153.9/91.5 mmHg) and the proportions of women (53.6%) and treatment naive patients (72.7%). After randomization, in the R and E groups combined, blood pressure dropped by 18.2/10.1 mmHg, 19.4/11.2 mmHg, 22.4/12.2 mmHg and 25.8/15.2 mmHg at weeks two (n = 122), four (n = 109), eight (n = 57), and 12 (n = 49), respectively. The control rate was >65% already at two weeks. At 12 weeks, 12 patients (24.5%) had progressed to the higher dose of R or E and/or had alpha-methyldopa added. Cohort analyses of 49 patients up to 12 weeks were confirmatory. Only two patients dropped out of the study. CONCLUSIONS: NOAAH (NCT01030458) demonstrated that blood pressure control can be achieved fast in Black patients born and living in Africa with a simple regimen consisting of a single-pill combination of two antihypertensive agents. NOAAH proves that randomized clinical trials of cardiovascular drugs in the indigenous populations of sub-Saharan Africa are feasible.