Structural and mechanistic insights into the Artemis endonuclease and strategies for its inhibition

Artemis (SNM1C/DCLRE1C) is an endonuclease that plays a key role in development of B- and T-lymphocytes and in dsDNA break repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Artemis is phosphorylated by DNA-PKcs and acts to open DNA hairpin intermediates generated during V(D)J and class-switch recombination. Artemis deficiency leads to congenital radiosensitive severe acquired immune deficiency (RS-SCID). Artemis belongs to a superfamily of nucleases containing metallo-β-lactamase (MBL) and β-CASP (CPSF-Artemis-SNM1-Pso2) domains. We present crystal structures of the catalytic domain of wildtype and variant forms of Artemis, including one causing RS-SCID Omenn syndrome. The catalytic domain of the Artemis has similar endonuclease activity to the phosphorylated full-length protein. Our structures help explain the predominantly endonucleolytic activity of Artemis, which contrasts with the predominantly exonuclease activity of the closely related SNM1A and SNM1B MBL fold nucleases. The structures reveal a second metal binding site in its β-CASP domain unique to Artemis, which is amenable to inhibition by compounds including ebselen. By combining our structural data with that from a recently reported Artemis structure, we were able model the interaction of Artemis with DNA substrates. The structures, including one of Artemis with the cephalosporin ceftriaxone, will help enable the rational development of selective SNM1 nuclease inhibitors.     

Structural insights into catalysis and dimerization enhanced exonuclease activity of RNase?J

RNase J is a conserved ribonuclease that belongs to the β-CASP family of nucleases. It possesses both endo- and exo-ribonuclease activities, which play a key role in pre-rRNA maturation and mRNA decay. Here we report high-resolution crystal structures of Deinococcus radiodurans RNase J complexed with RNA or uridine 5′-monophosphate in the presence of manganese ions. Biochemical and structural studies revealed that RNase J uses zinc ions for two-metal-ion catalysis. One residue conserved among RNase J orthologues (motif B) forms specific electrostatic interactions with the scissile phosphate of the RNA that is critical for the catalysis and product stabilization. The additional manganese ion, which is coordinated by conserved residues at the dimer interface, is critical for RNase J dimerization and exonuclease activity. The structures may also shed light on the mechanism of RNase J exo- and endonucleolytic activity switch.     

SNM1B/Apollo interacts with Astrin and is required for the prophase cell cycle checkpoint

Previously, we have shown that SNM1A is a multifunctional gene involved in both the DNA damage response and in an early mitotic checkpoint in response to spindle stress. Another member of the SNM1 gene family, SNM1B/Apollo, has been shown to have roles in both the response to DNA interstrand cross-linking agents and in telomere protection during S phase. Here, we demonstrate a novel role for SNM1B/Apollo in mitosis in response to spindle stress. SNM1B-deficient cells exhibit a defect in the prophase checkpoint. Loss of the prophase checkpoint induces an extended mitotic delay, which is due to prolonged activation of the spindle checkpoint. In addition, we show that SNM1B/Apollo interacts with the essential microtubule binding protein Astrin. SNM1B/Apollo interacts with Astrin through its conserved metallo-β-lactamase domain, and disruption of this interaction by point mutations results in a deficient prophase checkpoint. These findings suggest that SNM1B/Apollo and Astrin function together to enforce the prophase checkpoint in response to spindle stress.     

Crystal Structure of Yeast DNA Polymerase ε Catalytic Domain

DNA polymerase ε (Polε) is a multi-subunit polymerase that contributes to genomic stability via its roles in leading strand replication and the repair of damaged DNA. Here we report the ternary structure of the Polε catalytic subunit (Pol2) bound to a nascent G:C base pair (Pol2_G:C). Pol2_G:C has a typical B-family polymerase fold and embraces the template-primer duplex with the palm, fingers, thumb and exonuclease domains. The overall arrangement of domains is similar to the structure of Pol2_T:A reported recently, but there are notable differences in their polymerase and exonuclease active sites. In particular, we observe Ca²⁺ ions at both positions A and B in the polymerase active site and also observe a Ca²⁺ at position B of the exonuclease site. We find that the contacts to the nascent G:C base pair in the Pol2_G:C structure are maintained in the Pol2_T:A structure and reflect the comparable fidelity of Pol2 for nascent purine-pyrimidine and pyrimidine-purine base pairs. We note that unlike that of Pol3, the shape of the nascent base pair binding pocket in Pol2 is modulated from the major grove side by the presence of Tyr431. Together with Pol2_T:A, our results provide a framework for understanding the structural basis of high fidelity DNA synthesis by Pol2.     

The hSNM1 protein is a DNA 5'-exonuclease

The human SNM1 protein is a member of a highly conserved group of proteins catalyzing the hydrolysis of nucleic acid substrates. Although overproduction is unstable in mammalian cells, we have overproduced a recombinant hSNM1 protein in an insect cell system. The protein is a single-strand 5′-exonuclease, like its yeast homolog. The enzyme utilizes either DNA or RNA substrates, requires a 5′-phosphate moiety, shows very little activity on double-strand substrates, and functions at a size consistent with a monomer. The exonuclease activity requires the conserved β-lactamase domain; site-directed mutagenesis of a conserved aspartate inactivates the exonuclease.     

Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase uses acid-base catalysis for selective excision of damaged purines

Human alkyladenine DNA glycosylase (AAG) protects against alkylative and oxidative DNA damage, flipping damaged nucleotides out of double-stranded DNA and catalyzing the hydrolytic cleavage of the N-glycosidic bond to release the damaged nucleobase. The crystal structure of AAG bound to a DNA substrate reveals features of the active site that could discriminate between oxidatively damaged or alkylated purines and normal purines. A water molecule bound in the active site adjacent to the anomeric carbon of the N-glycosidic bond is suggestive of direct attack by water, with Glu125 acting as a general base. However, biochemical evidence for this proposed mechanism has been lacking. The structure also fails to explain why smaller pyrimidine nucleosides are excluded as substrates from this relatively permissive active site that catalyzes the excision of a structurally diverse group of damaged purine bases. We have used pH dependencies, site-directed mutagenesis, and a variety of substrates to investigate the catalytic mechanism of AAG. Single-turnover excision of hypoxanthine and 1,N(6)-ethenoadenine follows bell-shaped pH-rate profiles, indicating that AAG-catalyzed excision of these neutral lesions requires the action of both a general acid and a general base. In contrast, the pH-rate profile for the reaction of 7-methylguanine, a positively charged substrate, shows only a single ionization corresponding to a general base. These results suggest that AAG activates neutral lesions by protonation of the nucleobase leaving group. Glu125 must be deprotonated in the active form of the enzyme, consistent with a role as a general base that activates and positions a water nucleophile. Acid-base catalysis can account for much of the 10(8)-fold rate enhancement that is achieved by AAG in the excision of hypoxanthine. The prominent role of nucleobase protonation in catalysis by AAG provides a rationale for its specialization toward damaged purines while effectively excluding pyrimidines.     

Mechanistic decoupling of exonuclease III multifunctionality into AP endonuclease and exonuclease activities at the single-residue level

Bacterial exonuclease III (ExoIII) is a multifunctional enzyme that uses a single active site to perform two conspicuous activities: (i) apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP)-endonuclease and (ii) 3′→5′ exonuclease activities. The AP endonuclease activity results in AP site incision, while the exonuclease activity results in the continuous excision of 3′ terminal nucleobases to generate a partial duplex for recruiting the downstream DNA polymerase during the base excision repair process (BER). The key determinants of functional selection between the two activities are poorly understood. Here, we use a series of mutational analyses and single-molecule imaging to unravel the pivotal rules governing these endo- and exonuclease activities at the single amino acid level. An aromatic residue, either W212 or F213, recognizes AP sites to allow for the AP endonuclease activity, and the F213 residue also participates in the stabilization of the melted state of the 3′ terminal nucleobases, leading to the catalytically competent state that activates the 3′→5′ exonuclease activity. During exonucleolytic cleavage, the DNA substrate must be maintained as a B-form helix through a series of phosphate-stabilizing residues (R90, Y109, K121 and N153). Our work decouples the AP endonuclease and exonuclease activities of ExoIII and provides insights into how this multifunctional enzyme controls each function at the amino acid level.     

Enhancement of Human DNA Polymerase η Activity and Fidelity Is Dependent Upon a Bipartite Interaction with the Werner Syndrome Protein

We have investigated the interaction between human DNA polymerase η (hpol η) and the Werner syndrome protein (WRN). Functional assays revealed that the WRN exonuclease and RecQ C-terminal (RQC) domains are necessary for full stimulation of hpol η-catalyzed formation of correct base pairs. We find that WRN does not stimulate hpol η-catalyzed formation of mispairs. Moreover, the exonuclease activity of WRN prevents stable mispair formation by hpol η. These results are consistent with a proofreading activity for WRN during single-nucleotide additions. ATP hydrolysis by WRN appears to attenuate stimulation of hpol η. Pre-steady-state kinetic results show that k_pol is increased 4-fold by WRN. Finally, pulldown assays reveal a bipartite physical interaction between hpol η and WRN that is mediated by the exonuclease and RQC domains. Taken together, these results are consistent with alteration of the rate-limiting step in polymerase catalysis by direct protein-protein interactions between WRN and hpol η. In summary, WRN improves the efficiency and fidelity of hpol η to promote more effective replication of DNA.     

Probing the mechanisms of two exonuclease domain mutators of DNA polymerase ϵ

We report the properties of two mutations in the exonuclease domain of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase ϵ. One, pol2-Y473F, increases the mutation rate by about 20-fold, similar to the catalytically dead pol2-D290A/E290A mutant. The other, pol2-N378K, is a stronger mutator. Both retain the ability to excise a nucleotide from double-stranded DNA, but with impaired activity. pol2-Y473F degrades DNA poorly, while pol2-N378K degrades single-stranded DNA at an elevated rate relative to double-stranded DNA. These data suggest that pol2-Y473F reduces the capacity of the enzyme to perform catalysis in the exonuclease active site, while pol2-N378K impairs partitioning to the exonuclease active site. Relative to wild-type Pol ϵ, both variants decrease the dNTP concentration required to elicit a switch between proofreading and polymerization by more than an order of magnitude. While neither mutation appears to alter the sequence specificity of polymerization, the N378K mutation stimulates polymerase activity, increasing the probability of incorporation and extension of a mismatch. Considered together, these data indicate that impairing the primer strand transfer pathway required for proofreading increases the probability of common mutations by Pol ϵ, elucidating the association of homologous mutations in human DNA polymerase ϵ with cancer.     

A Single Mutation in Human Mitochondrial DNA Polymerase Pol γA Affects Both Polymerization and Proofreading Activities of Only the Holoenzyme

Common causes of human mitochondrial diseases are mutations affecting DNA polymerase (Pol) γ, the sole polymerase responsible for DNA synthesis in mitochondria. Although the polymerase and exonuclease active sites are located on the catalytic subunit Pol γA, in holoenzyme both activities are regulated by the accessory subunit Pol γB. Several patients with severe neurological and muscular disorders were reported to carry the Pol γA substitutions R232G or R232H, which lie outside of either active site. We report that Arg²³² substitutions have no effect on independent Pol γA activities but show major defects in the Pol γA-Pol γB holoenzyme, including decreased polymerase and increased exonuclease activities, the latter with decreased selectivity for mismatches. We show that Pol γB facilitates distinguishing mismatched from base-paired primer termini and that Pol γA Arg²³² is essential for mediating this regulatory function of the accessory subunit. This study provides a molecular basis for the disease symptoms exhibited by patients carrying those substitutions.     

Role of an active site guanine in hairpin ribozyme catalysis probed by exogenous nucleobase rescue

The hairpin ribozyme is a small catalytic RNA with reversible phosphodiester cleavage activity. Biochemical and structural studies exclude a requirement for divalent metal cation cofactors and implicate one active site nucleobase in particular, G8, in the catalytic mechanism. Our previous work demonstrated that the cleavage activity that is lost when G8 is replaced by an abasic residue is restored when certain nucleobases are provided in solution. The specificity and pH dependence of exogenous nucleobase rescue were consistent with several models of the rescue mechanism, including general acid base catalysis, electrostatic stabilization of negative charge in the transition state or a requirement for protonation to facilitate exogenous nucleobase binding. Detailed analyses of exogenous nucleobase rescue for both cleavage and ligation reactions now allow us to refine models of the rescue mechanism. Activity increased with increasing pH for both unmodified ribozyme reactions and unrescued reactions of abasic variants lacking G8. This similarity in pH dependence argues against a role for G8 as a general base catalyst, because G8 deprotonation could not be responsible for the pH-dependent transition in the abasic variant. Exogenous nucleobase rescue of both cleavage and ligation activity increased with decreasing pH, arguing against a role for rescuing nucleobases in general acid catalysis, because a nucleobase that contributes general acid catalysis in the cleavage pathway should provide general base catalysis in ligation. Analysis of the concentration dependence of cytosine rescue at high and low pH demonstrated that protonation promotes catalysis within the nucleobase-bound ribozyme complex but does not stabilize nucleobase binding in the ground state. These results support an electrostatic stabilization mechanism in which exogenous nucleobase binding counters negative charge that develops in the transition state.     

Characterization of the human SNM1A and SNM1B/Apollo DNA repair exonucleases

Human SNM1A and SNM1B/Apollo have both been implicated in the repair of DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) by cellular studies, and SNM1B is also required for telomere protection. Here, we describe studies on the biochemical characterization of the SNM1A and SNM1B proteins. The results reveal some fundamental differences in the mechanisms of the two proteins. Both SNM1A and SNM1B digest double-stranded and single-stranded DNA with a 5'-to-3' directionality in a reaction that is stimulated by divalent cations, and both nucleases are inhibited by the zinc chelator o-phenanthroline. We find that SNM1A has greater affinity for single-stranded DNA over double-stranded DNA that is not observed with SNM1B. Although both proteins demonstrate a low level of processivity on low molecular weight DNA oligonucleotide substrates, when presented with high molecular weight DNA, SNM1A alone is rendered much more active, being capable of digesting kilobase-long stretches of DNA. Both proteins can digest past ICLs induced by the non-distorting minor groove cross-linking agent SJG-136, albeit with SNM1A showing a greater capacity to achieve this. This is consistent with the proposal that SNM1A and SNM1B might exhibit some redundancy in ICL repair. Together, our work establishes differences in the substrate selectivities of SNM1A and SNM1B that are likely to be relevant to their in vivo roles and which might be exploited in the development of selective inhibitors.     

Enforced presentation of an extrahelical guanine to the lesion recognition pocket of human 8-oxoguanine glycosylase, hOGG1

A poorly understood aspect of DNA repair proteins is their ability to identify exceedingly rare sites of damage embedded in a large excess of nearly identical undamaged DNA, while catalyzing repair only at the damaged sites. Progress toward understanding this problem has been made by comparing the structures and biochemical behavior of these enzymes when they are presented with either a target lesion or a corresponding undamaged nucleobase. Trapping and analyzing such DNA-protein complexes is particularly difficult in the case of base extrusion DNA repair proteins because of the complexity of the repair reaction, which involves extrusion of the target base from DNA followed by its insertion into the active site where glycosidic bond cleavage is catalyzed. Here we report the structure of a human 8-oxoguanine (oxoG) DNA glycosylase, hOGG1, in which a normal guanine from DNA has been forcibly inserted into the enzyme active site. Although the interactions of the nucleobase with the active site are only subtly different for G versus oxoG, hOGG1 fails to catalyze excision of the normal nucleobase. This study demonstrates that even if hOGG1 mistakenly inserts a normal base into its active site, the enzyme can still reject it on the basis of catalytic incompatibility.     

DNA damage alters DNA polymerase δ to a form that exhibits increased discrimination against modified template bases and mismatched primers

Human DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ4), a key enzyme in chromosomal replication, is a heterotetramer composed of the p125, p50, p68 and p12 subunits. Genotoxic agents such as UV and alkylating chemicals trigger a DNA damage response in which Pol δ4 is converted to a trimer (Pol δ3) by degradation of p12. We show that Pol δ3 has altered enzymatic properties: it is less able to perform translesion synthesis on templates containing base lesions (O⁶-MeG, 8-oxoG, an abasic site or a thymine-thymine dimer); a greater proofreading activity; an increased exonuclease/polymerase activity ratio; a decreased tendency for the insertion of wrong nucleotides, and for the extension of mismatched primers. Overall, our findings indicate that Pol δ3 exhibits an enhanced ability for the detection of errors in both primers and templates over its parent enzyme. These alterations in Pol δ3 show that p12 plays a major role in Pol δ4 catalytic functions, and provides significant insights into the rationale for the conversion of Pol δ4 to Pol δ3 in the cellular response to DNA damage.     

Entrapment and Structure of an Extrahelical Guanine Attempting to Enter the Active Site of a Bacterial DNA Glycosylase, MutM

MutM, a bacterial DNA glycosylase, protects genome integrity by catalyzing glycosidic bond cleavage of 8-oxoguanine (oxoG) lesions, thereby initiating base excision DNA repair. The process of searching for and locating oxoG lesions is especially challenging, because of the close structural resemblance of oxoG to its million-fold more abundant progenitor, G. Extrusion of the target nucleobase from the DNA double helix to an extrahelical position is an essential step in lesion recognition and catalysis by MutM. Although the interactions between the extruded oxoG and the active site of MutM have been well characterized, little is known in structural detail regarding the interrogation of extruded normal DNA bases by MutM. Here we report the capture and structural elucidation of a complex in which MutM is attempting to present an undamaged G to its active site. The structure of this MutM-extrahelical G complex provides insights into the mechanism MutM employs to discriminate against extrahelical normal DNA bases and into the base extrusion process in general.     

DNA polymerase delta-dependent repair of DNA single strand breaks containing 3'-end proximal lesions

Base excision repair (BER) is the major pathway for the repair of simple, non-bulky lesions in DNA that is initiated by a damage-specific DNA glycosylase. Several human DNA glycosylases exist that efficiently excise numerous types of lesions, although the close proximity of a single strand break (SSB) to a DNA adduct can have a profound effect on both BER and SSB repair. We recently reported that DNA lesions located as a second nucleotide 5′-upstream to a DNA SSB are resistant to DNA glycosylase activity and this study further examines the processing of these ‘complex’ lesions. We first demonstrated that the damaged base should be excised before SSB repair can occur, since it impaired processing of the SSB by the BER enzymes, DNA ligase IIIα and DNA polymerase β. Using human whole cell extracts, we next isolated the major activity against DNA lesions located as a second nucleotide 5′-upstream to a DNA SSB and identified it as DNA polymerase δ (Pol δ). Using recombinant protein we confirmed that the 3′-5′-exonuclease activity of Pol δ can efficiently remove these DNA lesions. Furthermore, we demonstrated that mouse embryonic fibroblasts, deficient in the exonuclease activity of Pol δ are partially deficient in the repair of these ‘complex’ lesions, demonstrating the importance of Pol δ during the repair of DNA lesions in close proximity to a DNA SSB, typical of those induced by ionizing radiation.     

The proofreading 3′→5′ exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases: a kinetic barrier to translesion DNA synthesis

The 3′→5′ exonuclease activity intrinsic to several DNA polymerases plays a primary role in genetic stability; it acts as a first line of defense in correcting DNA polymerase errors. A mismatched basepair at the primer terminus is the preferred substrate for the exonuclease activity over a correct basepair. The efficiency of the exonuclease as a proofreading activity for mispairs containing a DNA lesion varies, however, being dependent upon both the DNA polymerase/exonuclease and the type of DNA lesion. The exonuclease activities intrinsic to the T4 polymerase (family B) and DNA polymerase γ (family A) proofread DNA mispairs opposite endogenous DNA lesions, including alkylation, oxidation, and abasic adducts. However, the exonuclease of the Klenow polymerase cannot discriminate between correct and incorrect bases opposite alkylation and oxidative lesions. DNA damage alters the dynamics of the intramolecular partitioning of DNA substrates between the 3′→5′ exonuclease and polymerase activities. Enzymatic idling at lesions occurs when an exonuclease activity efficiently removes the same base that is preferentially incorporated by the DNA polymerase activity. Thus, the exonuclease activity can also act as a kinetic barrier to translesion synthesis (TLS) by preventing the stable incorporation of bases opposite DNA lesions. Understanding the downstream consequences of exonuclease activity at DNA lesions is necessary for elucidating the mechanisms of translesion synthesis and damage-induced cytotoxicity.     

Human TDP1, APE1 and TREX1 repair 3′-DNA–peptide/protein cross-links arising from abasic sites in vitro

Histones and many other proteins react with abundant endogenous DNA lesions, apurinic/apyrimidinic (abasic, AP) sites and/or 3′-phospho-α,β-unsaturated aldehyde (3′-PUA), to form unstable but long-lived Schiff base DNA–protein cross-links at 3′-DNA termini (3′-PUA–protein DPCs). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) cross-links to the AP site in a similar manner but the Schiff base is reduced by PARP1’s intrinsic redox capacity, yielding a stable 3′-PUA–PARP1 DPC. Eradicating these DPCs is critical for maintaining the genome integrity because 3′-hydroxyl is required for DNA synthesis and ligation. But how they are repaired is not well understood. Herein, we chemically synthesized 3′-PUA-aminooxylysine-peptide adducts that closely resemble the proteolytic 3′-PUA–protein DPCs, and found that they can be repaired by human tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1), AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) and three-prime repair exonuclease 1 (TREX1). We characterized these novel repair pathways by measuring the kinetic constants and determining the effect of cross-linked peptide length, flanking DNA structure, and the opposite nucleobase. We further found that these nucleases can directly repair 3′-PUA–histone DPCs, but not 3′-PUA–PARP1 DPCs unless proteolysis occurs initially. Collectively, we demonstrated that in vitro 3′-PUA–protein DPCs can be repaired by TDP1, APE1, and TREX1 following proteolysis, but the proteolysis is not absolutely required for smaller DPCs.