Sec-dependent protein translocation across biological membranes: evolutionary conservation of an essential protein transport pathway (Review)

All living organisms, no matter how simple or complex, possess the ability to translocate proteins across biological membranes and into different cellular compartments. Although a range of membrane transport processes exist, the major pathway used to translocate proteins across the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane or the eukaryotic endoplasmic reticulum membrane is conserved and is known as the Sec or Sec61 pathway, respectively. Over the past two decades the Sec and Sec61 pathways have been studied extensively and are well characterised at the genetic and biochemical levels. However, it is only now with the recent structural determination of a number of the key elements of the pathways that the translocation complex is beginning to give up its secrets in exquisite molecular detail. This article will focus on the routes of Sec- and Sec61-dependent membrane targeting and the nature of the translocation channel in bacteria and eukaryotes.     

The Sec translocon mediated protein transport in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

Protein transport via the Sec translocon represents an evolutionary conserved mechanism for delivering cytosolically-synthesized proteins to extra-cytosolic compartments. The Sec translocon has a three-subunit core, termed Sec61 in Eukaryotes and SecYEG in Bacteria. It is located in the endoplasmic reticulum of Eukaryotes and in the cytoplasmic membrane of Bacteria where it constitutes a channel that can be activated by multiple partner proteins. These partner proteins determine the mechanism of polypeptide movement across the channel. During SRP-dependent co-translational targeting, the ribosome threads the nascent protein directly into the Sec channel. This pathway is in Bacteria mainly dedicated for membrane proteins but in Eukaryotes also employed by secretory proteins. The alternative pathway, leading to post-translational translocation across the Sec translocon engages an ATP-dependent pushing mechanism by the motor protein SecA in Bacteria and a ratcheting mechanism by the lumenal chaperone BiP in Eukaryotes. Protein transport and biogenesis is also assisted by additional proteins at the lateral gate of SecY/Sec61α and in the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum or in the periplasm of bacterial cells. The modular assembly enables the Sec complex to transport a vast array of substrates. In this review we summarize recent biochemical and structural information on the prokaryotic and eukaryotic Sec translocons and we describe the remarkably complex interaction network of the Sec complexes.     

Multiple pathways used for the targeting of thylakoid proteins in chloroplasts

The assembly of the chloroplast thylakoid membrane requires the import of numerous proteins from the cytosol and their targeting into or across the thylakoid membrane. It is now clear that multiple pathways are involved in the thylakoid-targeting stages, depending on the type of protein substrate. Two very different pathways are used by thylakoid lumen proteins; one is the Sec pathway which has been well-characterised in bacteria, and which involves the threading of the substrate through a narrow channel. In contrast, the more recently characterised twin-arginine translocation (Tat) system is able to translocate fully folded proteins across this membrane. Recent advances on bacterial Tat systems shed further light on the structure and function of this system. Membrane proteins, on the other hand, use two further pathways. One is the signal recognition particle-dependent pathway, involving a complex interplay between many different factors, whereas other proteins insert without the assistance of any known apparatus. This article reviews advances in the study of these pathways and considers the rationale behind the surprising complexity.     

The Brl domain in Sec63p is required for assembly of functional endoplasmic reticulum translocons

Protein translocation into the endoplasmic reticulum occurs at pore-forming structures known as translocons. In yeast, two different targeting pathways converge at a translocation pore formed by the Sec61 complex. The signal recognition particle-dependent pathway targets nascent precursors co-translationally, whereas the Sec62p-dependent pathway targets polypeptides post-translationally. In addition to the Sec61 complex, both pathways also require Sec63p, an integral membrane protein of the Hsp40 family, and Kar2p, a soluble Hsp70 located in the ER lumen. Using a series of mutant alleles, we demonstrate that a conserved Brl (Brr2-like) domain in the COOH-terminal cytosolic region of Sec63p is essential for function both in vivo and in vitro. We further demonstrate that this domain is required for assembly of two oligomeric complexes of 350 and 380 kDa, respectively. The larger of these corresponds to the heptameric "SEC complex" required for post-translational translocation. However, the 350-kDa complex represents a newly defined hexameric SEC' complex comprising Sec61p, Sss1p, Sbh1p, Sec63p, Sec71p, and Sec72p. Our data indicate that the SEC' complex is required for co-translational protein translocation across the yeast ER membrane.     

Structural insight into the protein translocation channel

A structurally conserved protein translocation channel is formed by the heterotrimeric Sec61 complex in eukaryotes, and SecY complex in archaea and bacteria. Electron microscopy studies suggest that the channel may function as an oligomeric assembly of Sec61 or SecY complexes. Remarkably, the recently determined X-ray structure of an archaeal SecY complex indicates that the pore is located at the center of a single molecule of the complex. This structure suggests how the pore opens perpendicular to the plane of the membrane to allow the passage of newly synthesized secretory proteins across the membrane and opens laterally to allow transmembrane segments of nascent membrane proteins to enter the lipid bilayer. The electron microscopy and X-ray results together suggest that only one copy of the SecY or Sec61 complex within an oligomer translocates a polypeptide chain at any given time.     

Stability and function of the Sec61 translocation complex depends on the Sss1p tail-anchor sequence

Sss1p, an essential component of the heterotrimeric Sec61 complex in the ER (endoplasmic reticulum), is a tail-anchored protein whose precise mechanism of action is largely unknown. Tail-anchored proteins are involved in many cellular processes and are characterized by a single transmembrane sequence at or near the C-terminus. The Sec61 complex is the molecular machine through which secretory and membrane proteins translocate into and across the ER membrane. To understand the function of the tail anchor of Sss1p, we introduced mutations into the tail-anchor sequence and analysed the resulting yeast phenotypes. Point mutations in the C-terminal hydrophobic core of the tail anchor of Sss1p were identified that allowed Sss1p assembly into Sec61 complexes, but resulted in diminished growth, defects in co- and post-translational translocation, inefficient ribosome binding to Sec61 complexes, reduction in the stability of both heterotrimeric Sec61 and heptameric Sec complexes and a complete breakdown of ER structure. The underlying defect caused by the mutations involves loss of a stabilizing function of the Sss1p tail-anchor sequence for both the heterotrimeric Sec61 and the heptameric Sec complexes. These results indicate that by stabilizing multiprotein membrane complexes, the hydrophobic core of a tail-anchor sequence can be more than a simple membrane anchor.     

Mammalian Sec61 is associated with Sec62 and Sec63

In yeast, efficient protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane may occur co-translationally or post-translationally. The latter process is mediated by a membrane protein complex that consists of the Sec61p complex and the Sec62p-Sec63p subcomplex. In contrast, in mammalian cells protein translocation is almost exclusively co-translational. This transport depends on the Sec61 complex, which is homologous to the yeast Sec61p complex and has been identified in mammals as a ribosome-bound pore-forming membrane protein complex. We report here the existence of ribosome-free mammalian Sec61 complexes that associate with two ubiquitous proteins of the ER membrane. According to primary sequence analysis both proteins display homology to the yeast proteins Sec62p and Sec63p and are therefore named Sec62 and Sec63, respectively. The probable function of the mammalian Sec61-Sec62-Sec63 complex is discussed with respect to its abundance in ER membranes, which, in contrast to yeast ER membranes, apparently lack efficient post-translational translocation activity.     

Proper insertion and topogenesis of membrane proteins in the ER depend on Sec63

BackgroundIn eukaryotic cells, biogenesis of proteins destined to the secretory pathway begins from the cytosol. Nascent chains are either co-translationally or post-translationally targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and translocated across the membrane through the Sec61 complex. For the post-translational translocation, the Sec62/Sec63 complex is additionally required. Sec63, however, is also shown to mediate co-translational translocation of a subset of proteins, the types and characteristics of proteins that Sec63 mediates in translocation still await to be defined.MethodsTo overview the types of proteins that require Sec63 for the ER translocation, we prepared Sec63 mutant lacking the first 39 residues (Sec63_ΔN39) in yeast and assessed initial translocation efficiencies of diverse types of precursors in the sec63_ΔN39 strain by a 5 min metabolic labeling. By employing Blue-Native gel electrophoresis (BN-PAGE), stability of the SEC complex (Sec61 plus Sec62/Sec63 complexes) isolated from cells carrying the Sec63_ΔN39 mutant was examined.ResultsAmong the various translocation precursors tested, we found that proper sorting of single- and double-pass membrane proteins was severely impaired in addition to post-translational translocation precursor in the sec63_ΔN39 mutant strain. Stability of the SEC complex was compromised upon deletion of the N-terminal 39 residues.ConclusionsThe N-terminus of Sec63 is important for stability of the SEC complex and Sec63 is required for proper sorting of membrane proteins in vivo.General significanceSec63 is essential on insertion of membrane proteins.     

The plug domain of yeast Sec61p is important for efficient protein translocation, but is not essential for cell viability

The Sec61/SecY translocon mediates translocation of proteins across the membrane and integration of membrane proteins into the lipid bilayer. The structure of the translocon revealed a plug domain blocking the pore on the lumenal side. It was proposed to be important for gating the protein conducting channel and for maintaining the permeability barrier in its unoccupied state. Here, we analyzed in yeast the effect of introducing destabilizing point mutations in the plug domain or of its partial or complete deletion. Unexpectedly, even when the entire plug domain was deleted, cells were viable without growth phenotype. They showed an effect on signal sequence orientation of diagnostic signal-anchor proteins, a minor defect in cotranslational and a significant deficiency in posttranslational translocation. Steady-state levels of the mutant protein were reduced, and when coexpressed with wild-type Sec61p, the mutant lacking the plug competed poorly for complex partners. The results suggest that the plug is unlikely to be important for sealing the translocation pore in yeast but that it plays a role in stabilizing Sec61p during translocon formation.     

Coordination of N-glycosylation and protein translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane by Sss1 protein

Secretory proteins are translocated across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane through a channel formed by three proteins, namely Sec61p, Sbh1p, and Sss1p (Johnson, A. E., and van Waes, M. A. (1999) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 15, 799-842). Sec61p and Sss1p are essential for translocation (Esnault, Y., Blondel, M. O., Deshaies, R. J., Schekman, R., and Kepes, F. (1993) EMBO J. 12, 4083-4093). Sec61p is a polytopic membrane protein that lines the protein translocation channel. The role of Sss1p is unknown. During import into the ER through the Sec61p channel, many proteins are N-glycosylated before translocation is completed. In addition, both the Sec61 channel and oligosaccharyl transferase (OST) copurify with ribosomes from rough ER, suggesting that OST is located in close proximity to the Sec61 channel (Gorlich, D., Prehn, S., Hartmann, E., Kalies, K.-U., and Rapoport, T. A. (1992) Cell 71, 489-503 and Wang, L., and Dobberstein, B. (1999) FEBS Lett. 457, 316-322). Here, we demonstrate a direct interaction between Sss1p and a subunit of OST, Wbp1p, using the split-ubiquitin system and co-immunoprecipitation. We generated mutants in the cytoplasmic domain of Sss1p that disturb the interaction with OST and are viable but display a translocation defect specific for proteins with glycosylation acceptor sites. Our data suggest that Sss1p coordinates translocation across the ER membrane and N-linked glycosylation of secretory proteins.     

Sec61p is part of the endoplasmic reticulum‐associated degradation machinery

Endoplasmic reticulum‐associated degradation (ERAD) is a cellular pathway for the disposal of misfolded secretory proteins. This process comprises recognition of the misfolded proteins followed by their retro‐translocation across the ER membrane into the cytosol in which polyubiquitination and proteasomal degradation occur. A variety of data imply that the protein import channel Sec61p has a function in the ERAD process. Until now, no physical interactions between Sec61p and other essential components of the ERAD pathway could be found. Here, we establish this link by showing that Hrd3p, which is part of the Hrd‐Der ubiquitin ligase complex, and other core components of the ERAD machinery physically interact with Sec61p. In addition, we study binding of misfolded CPY^* proteins to Sec61p during the process of degradation. We show that interaction with Sec61p is maintained until the misfolded proteins are ubiquitinated on the cytosolic side of the ER. Our observations suggest that Sec61p contacts an ERAD ligase complex for further elimination of ER lumenal misfolded proteins.     

A complex of chaperones and disulfide isomerases occludes the cytosolic face of the translocation protein Sec61p and affects translocation of the prion protein

Secretion of newly synthesized proteins across the mammalian rough endoplasmic reticulum (translocation) is supported by the membrane proteins Sec61p and TRAM, but may also include accessory factors, depending on the particular translocation substrate. Studies designed to investigate the binding of anti-peptide antibodies to the carboxyl terminus of the alpha-subunit of Sec61 (Sec61palpha) lead us to the isolation of a complex of proteins that occlude the cytosolic face of Sec61palpha in microsomes that have been prepared by standard protocols used to study translocation in vitro [Walter, P., and Blobel, G. (1983) Methods Enzymol. 96, 84-93]. This complex was shown by nanospray tandem mass spectrometry to be composed of protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), calcium binding protein 1 (CABP1/P5), 72 kDa endoplasmic reticulum protein (ERp72), and BiP (heat shock protein A5/HSPA5), and has been named TR-PDI for "translocon-resident protein disulfide isomerase complex". This constitutes a novel location for these proteins, which are known to be major constituents of the lumen of the rough endoplasmic reticulum. We have not established the function of TR-PDI at this location, but did observe that the absence of this complex results in a relative loss of correct topology of prion protein insertion across RER membranes, indicating the possibility of a functional role in vivo.     

Identification of MarvelD3 as a tight junction-associated transmembrane protein of the occludin family

Background

Protein translocation across the membrane of the Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) is the first step in the biogenesis of secretory and membrane proteins. Proteins enter the ER by the Sec61 translocon, a proteinaceous channel composed of three subunits, α, β and γ. While it is known that Sec61α forms the actual channel, the function of the other two subunits remains to be characterized.

Results

In the present study we have investigated the function of Sec61β in Drosophila melanogaster. We describe its role in the plasma membrane traffic of Gurken, the ligand for the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF) receptor in the oocyte. Germline clones of the mutant allele of Sec61β show normal translocation of Gurken into the ER and transport to the Golgi complex, but further traffic to the plasma membrane is impeded. The defect in plasma membrane traffic due to absence of Sec61β is specific for Gurken and is not due to a general trafficking defect.

Conclusion

Based on our study we conclude that Sec61β, which is part of the ER protein translocation channel affects a post-ER step during Gurken trafficking to the plasma membrane. We propose an additional role of Sec61β beyond protein translocation into the ER.     

Protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

A decisive step in the biosynthesis of many eukaryotic proteins is their partial or complete translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. A similar process occurs in prokaryotes, except that proteins are transported across or are integrated into the plasma membrane. In both cases, translocation occurs through a protein-conducting channel that is formed from a conserved, heterotrimeric membrane protein complex, the Sec61 or SecY complex. Structural and biochemical data suggest mechanisms that enable the channel to function with different partners, to open across the membrane and to release laterally hydrophobic segments of membrane proteins into lipid.     

Interactions between Sec complex and prepro-alpha-factor during posttranslational protein transport into the endoplasmic reticulum

Posttranslational translocation of prepro-alpha-factor (ppalphaF) across the yeast endoplasmic reticulum membrane begins with the binding of the signal sequence to the Sec complex, a membrane component consisting of the trimeric Sec61p complex and the tetrameric Sec62p/63p complex. We show by photo-cross-linking that the signal sequence is bound directly to a site where it contacts simultaneously Sec61p and Sec62p, suggesting that there is a single signal sequence recognition step. We found no evidence for the simultaneous contact of the signal sequence with two Sec61p molecules. To identify transmembrane segments of Sec61p that line the actual translocation pore, a late translocation intermediate of ppalphaF was generated with photoreactive probes incorporated into the mature portion of the polypeptide. Cross-linking to multiple regions of Sec61p was observed. In contrast to the signal sequence, neighboring positions of the mature portion of ppalphaF had similar interactions with Sec61p. These data suggest that the channel pore is lined by several transmembrane segments, which have no significant affinity for the translocating polypeptide chain.     

Cotranslational Targeting and Posttranslational Translocation can Cooperate in Spc3 Topogenesis

Secretory and membrane proteins follow either the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent cotranslational translocation pathway or the SRP-independent Sec62/Sec63-dependent posttranslational pathway for their translocation across the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). However, increasing evidence suggests that most proteins are cotranslationally targeted to the ER, suggesting mixed mechanisms. It remains unclear how these two pathways cooperate. Previous studies have shown that Spc3, a signal-anchored protein, requires SRP and Sec62 for its biogenesis. This study investigated the targeting and topogenesis of Spc3 and the step at which SRP and Sec62 act using in vivo and in vitro translocation assays and co-immunoprecipitation. Our data suggest that Spc3 reaches its final topology in two steps: it enters the ER lumen head-first and then inverts its orientation. The first step is partially dependent on SRP, although independent of the Sec62/Sec63 complex. The second step is mediated by the Sec62/Sec63 complex. These data suggest that SRP and Sec62 act on a distinct step in the topogenesis of Spc3.     

Degradation of subunits of the Sec61p complex, an integral component of the ER membrane, by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway.

We have investigated the degradation of subunits of the trimeric Sec61p complex, a key component of the protein translocation apparatus of the ER membrane. A mutant form of Sec6lp and one of the two associated proteins (Sss1p) are selectively degraded, while the third constituent of the complex (Sbh1p) is stable. Our results demonstrate that the proteolysis of the multispanning membrane protein Sec61p is mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, since it requires polyubiquitination, the presence of a membrane-bound (Ubc6) and a soluble (Ubc7) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and a functional proteasome. The process is proposed to be specific for unassembled Sec61p and Sss1p. Thus, our results suggest that one pathway of ER degradation of abnormal or unassembled membrane proteins is initiated at the cytoplasmic side of the ER.     

Component specificity for the thylakoidal Sec and Delta pH-dependent protein transport pathways.

Prokaryotes and prokaryote-derived thylakoid membranes of chloroplasts share multiple, evolutionarily conserved pathways for protein export. These include the Sec, signal recognition particle (SRP), and Delta pH/Tat systems. Little is known regarding the thylakoid membrane components involved in these pathways. We isolated a cDNA clone to a novel component of the Delta pH pathway, Tha4, and prepared antibodies against pea Tha4, against maize Hcf106, a protein implicated in Delta pH pathway transport by genetic studies, and against cpSecY, the thylakoid homologue of the bacterial SecY translocon protein. These components were localized to the nonappressed thylakoid membranes. Tha4 and Hcf106 were present in approximately 10-fold excess over active translocation sites. Antibodies to either Tha4 or Hcf106 inhibited translocation of four known Delta pH pathway substrate proteins, but not of Sec pathway or SRP pathway substrates. This suggests that Tha4 and Hcf106 operate either in series or as subunits of a heteromultimeric complex. cpSecY antibodies inhibited translocation of Sec pathway substrates but not of Delta pH or SRP pathway substrates. These studies provide the first biochemical evidence that Tha4 and Hcf106 are specific components of the Delta pH pathway and provide one line of evidence that cpSecY is used specifically by the Sec pathway.     

In vitro binding of ribosomes to the beta subunit of the Sec61p protein translocation complex

The Sec61p complex forms the core element of the protein translocation complex (translocon) in the rough endoplasmic reticulum (rough ER) membrane. Translating or nontranslating ribosomes bind with high affinity to ER membranes that have been stripped of ribosomes or to liposomes containing purified Sec61p. Here we present evidence that the beta subunit of the complex (Sec61beta) makes contact with nontranslating ribosomes. A fusion protein containing the Sec61beta cytoplasmic domain (Sec61beta(c)) prevents the binding of ribosomes to stripped ER-derived membranes and also binds to ribosomes directly with an affinity close to the affinity of ribosomes for stripped ER-derived membranes. The ribosome binding activity of Sec61beta(c), like that of native ER membranes, is sensitive to high salt concentrations and is not based on an unspecific charge-dependent interaction of the relatively basic Sec61beta(c) domain with ribosomal RNA. Like stripped ER membranes, the Sec61beta(c) sequence binds to large ribosomal subunits in preference over small subunits. Previous studies have shown that Sec61beta is inessential for ribosome binding and protein translocation, but translocation is impaired by the absence of Sec61beta, and it has been proposed that Sec61beta assists in the insertion of nascent proteins into the translocation pore. Our results suggest a physical interaction of the ribosome itself with Sec61beta; this may normally occur alongside interactions between the ribosome and other elements of Sec61p, or it may represent one stage in a temporal sequence of binding.     

Signal sequence-dependent function of the TRAM protein during early phases of protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane

Cotranslational translocation of proteins across the mammalian ER membrane involves, in addition to the signal recognition particle receptor and the Sec61p complex, the translocating chain-associating membrane (TRAM) protein, the function of which is still poorly understood. Using reconstituted proteoliposomes, we show here that the translocation of most, but not all, secretory proteins requires the function of TRAM. Experiments with hybrid proteins demonstrate that the structure of the signal sequence determines whether or not TRAM is needed. Features that distinguish TRAM-dependent and -independent signal sequences include the length of their charged, NH2-terminal region and the structure of their hydrophobic core. In cases where TRAM is required for translocation, it is not needed for the initial interaction of the ribosome/nascent chain complex with the ER membrane but for a subsequent step inside the membrane in which the nascent chain is inserted into the translocation site in a protease-resistant manner. Thus, TRAM functions in a signal sequence-dependent manner at a critical, early phase of the translocation process.