Reconstitution of Uracil DNA Glycosylase-initiated Base Excision Repair in Herpes Simplex Virus-1

Herpes simplex virus-1 is a large double-stranded DNA virus that is self-sufficient in a number of genome transactions. Hence, the virus encodes its own DNA replication apparatus and is capable of mediating recombination reactions. We recently reported that the catalytic subunit of the HSV-1 DNA polymerase (UL30) exhibits apurinic/apyrimidinic and 5′-deoxyribose phosphate lyase activities that are integral to base excision repair. Base excision repair is required to maintain genome stability as a means to counter the accumulation of unusual bases and to protect from the loss of DNA bases. Here we have reconstituted a system with purified HSV-1 and human proteins that perform all the steps of uracil DNA glycosylase-initiated base excision repair. In this system nucleotide incorporation is dependent on the HSV-1 uracil DNA glycosylase (UL2), human AP endonuclease, and the HSV-1 DNA polymerase. Completion of base excision repair can be mediated by T4 DNA ligase as well as human DNA ligase I or ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex. Of these, ligase IIIα-XRCC1 is the most efficient. Moreover, ligase IIIα-XRCC1 confers specificity onto the reaction in as much as it allows ligation to occur in the presence of the HSV-1 DNA polymerase processivity factor (UL42) and prevents base excision repair from occurring with heterologous DNA polymerases. Completion of base excision repair in this system is also dependent on the incorporation of the correct nucleotide. These findings demonstrate that the HSV-1 proteins in combination with cellular factors that are not encoded by the virus are capable of performing base excision repair. These results have implications on the role of base excision repair in viral genome maintenance during lytic replication and reactivation from latency.Herpes simplex virus-1 (HSV-1)² is a large double-stranded DNA virus with a genome of ∼152 kilobase pairs (for reviews, see Refs. 1 and 2). HSV-1 switches between lytic replication in epithelial cells and a state of latency in sensory neurons during which there is no detectable DNA replication (1). Viral DNA replication is mediated by seven essential virus-encoded factors (3–5). Of these, two encode subunits of the viral replicase (for review, see Refs. 6 and 7). The catalytic subunit (UL30) exhibits DNA polymerase (Pol), 3′-5′ proofreading exonuclease, and RNase H activities (8–11). UL30 exists as a heterodimer with the UL42 protein that confers a high degree of processivity on the Pol (11–17).Viral DNA replication is accompanied by vigorous recombination that leads to the formation of large networks of viral DNA replication intermediates (18). The HSV-1 single-strand DNA-binding protein (ICP8) has been shown to play a major role in mediating these recombination reactions (19–21). One role for the high frequency of recombination is to restart DNA replication at sites of fork collapse. Further mechanisms that contribute to genome maintenance are processes that survey and repair damage to the DNA to ensure the availability of a robust replication template. In this regard base excision repair (BER) is essential to remove unusual bases from the DNA and to repair apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites resulting from spontaneous base loss (for review, see Ref. 22). With respect to HSV-1, a recent study showed that viral DNA from infected cultured fibroblasts contains a steady state of 2.8–5.9 AP sites per viral genome equivalent (23). Because AP sites are non-instructional, the failure to repair such sites would terminate viral replication. Indeed, UL30 cannot replicate beyond a model AP site (tetrahydrofuran residue) (23), indicating that the virus must enable a process to repair such lesions. In this regard HSV-1 possesses several enzymes that would safeguard from the accumulation of unusual bases, specifically uracil, and base loss. Hence, HSV-1 encodes a uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) (UL2) as well as a dUTPase to reduce the pool of dUTP and prevent misincorporation by the viral Pol (24, 25). Moreover, we recently showed that the catalytic subunit of the viral Pol (UL30) exhibits AP and 5′-deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) lyase activities (26). The presence of a virus-encoded UDG and DNA lyase indicates that HSV-1 has the capacity to perform integral steps of BER, specifically for the removal of uracil. Indeed, the excision of uracil may be important for viral replication. Hence, it has been shown that uracil substitutions in the viral origins of replication alters their recognition by the viral initiator protein (27). Moreover, whereas UL2 may be dispensable for viral replication in fibroblast (24), UL2 mutants exhibit reduced neurovirulence and a decreased frequency of reactivation from latency (28). Thus, UDG action in HSV-1 may be important for viral reactivation after quiescence in neuronal cells during which the genome may accumulate uracil as a result of spontaneous deamination of cytosine. In another herpesvirus, cytomegalovirus, the viral UDG was shown to be required for the transition to late-phase DNA replication (29, 30). Consequently, it is possible that BER plays a significant role in various aspects of the herpesvirus life cycle.In mammalian single-nucleotide BER initiated by monofunctional DNA glycosylases, the resulting AP sites are incised hydrolytically at the 5′ side by AP endonuclease (APE), generating a 3′-OH. This is followed by template-directed incorporation of one nucleotide by Pol β to generate a 5′-dRP flap (22, 31, 32). The 5′-dRP residue is subsequently removed by the 5′-dRP lyase activity of Pol β to leave a nick with a 3′-OH and 5′-phosphate that is ligated by DNA ligase I or the physiologically more relevant ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex (for review, see Refs. 33 and 34). Here we show that the HSV-1 UDG (UL2) and Pol (UL30) cooperate with human APE and human ligase IIIα-XRCC1 complex to perform BER in vitro. This finding has implications on the role of BER in viral genome maintenance during lytic replication and in the emergence of the virus from neuronal latency.     

Pif1 Helicase Lengthens Some Okazaki Fragment Flaps Necessitating Dna2 Nuclease/Helicase Action in the Two-nuclease Processing Pathway

We have developed a system to reconstitute all of the proposed steps of Okazaki fragment processing using purified yeast proteins and model substrates. DNA polymerase δ was shown to extend an upstream fragment to displace a downstream fragment into a flap. In most cases, the flap was removed by flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1), in a reaction required to remove initiator RNA in vivo. The nick left after flap removal could be sealed by DNA ligase I to complete fragment joining. An alternative pathway involving FEN1 and the nuclease/helicase Dna2 has been proposed for flaps that become long enough to bind replication protein A (RPA). RPA binding can inhibit FEN1, but Dna2 can shorten RPA-bound flaps so that RPA dissociates. Recent reconstitution results indicated that Pif1 helicase, a known component of fragment processing, accelerated flap displacement, allowing the inhibitory action of RPA. In results presented here, Pif1 promoted DNA polymerase δ to displace strands that achieve a length to bind RPA, but also to be Dna2 substrates. Significantly, RPA binding to long flaps inhibited the formation of the final ligation products in the reconstituted system without Dna2. However, Dna2 reversed that inhibition to restore efficient ligation. These results suggest that the two-nuclease pathway is employed in cells to process long flap intermediates promoted by Pif1.Eukaryotic cellular DNA is replicated semi-conservatively in the 5′ to 3′ direction. A leading strand is synthesized by DNA polymerase ϵ in a continuous manner in the direction of opening of the replication fork (1, 2). A lagging strand is synthesized by DNA polymerase δ (pol δ)³ in the opposite direction in a discontinuous manner, producing segments called Okazaki fragments (3). These stretches of ∼150 nucleotides (nt) must be joined together to create the continuous daughter strand. DNA polymerase α/primase (pol α) initiates each fragment by synthesizing an RNA/DNA primer consisting of ∼1-nt of RNA and ∼10–20 nt of DNA (4). The sliding clamp proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is loaded on the DNA by replication factor C (RFC). pol δ then complexes with PCNA and extends the primer. When pol δ reaches the 5′-end of the downstream Okazaki fragment, it displaces the end into a flap while continuing synthesis, a process known as strand displacement (5, 6). These flap intermediates are cleaved by nucleases to produce a nick for DNA ligase I (LigI) to seal, completing the DNA strand.In one proposed mechanism for flap processing, the only required nuclease is flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1). pol δ displaces relatively short flaps, which are cleaved by FEN1 as they are created, leaving a nick for LigI (7–9). FEN1 binds at the 5′-end of the flap and tracks down the flap cleaving only at the base (5, 10, 11). Because pol δ favors the displacement of RNA-DNA hybrids over DNA-DNA hybrids, strand displacement generally is limited to that of the initiator RNA of an Okazaki fragment (12). In addition, the tightly coordinated action of pol δ and FEN1 also tends to keep flaps short. However, biochemical reconstitution studies demonstrate that some flaps can become long (13, 14). Once these flaps reach ∼30 nt, they can be bound by the eukaryotic single strand binding protein replication protein A (RPA) (15). Binding by RPA to a flap substrate inhibits cleavage by FEN1 (16). The RPA-bound flap would then require another mechanism for proper processing.This second mechanism is proposed to utilize Dna2 (16) in addition to FEN1. Dna2 is both a 5′-3′ helicase and an endonuclease (17, 18). Like FEN1, Dna2 recognizes 5′-flap structures, binding at the 5′-end of the flap and tracking downward toward the base (19, 20). Unlike FEN1, Dna2 cleaves the flap multiple times but not all the way to the base, such that a short flap remains (20). RPA binding to a flap has been shown to stimulate Dna2 cleavage (16). Therefore, if a flap becomes long enough to bind RPA, Dna2 binds and cleaves it to a length of 5–10 nucleotides from which RPA dissociates (21). FEN1 can then enter the flap, displace the Dna2, and then cleave at the base to make the nick for ligation (16, 18, 22). The need for this mechanism may be one reason why DNA2 is an essential gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (23, 24). It has been proposed that, in the absence of Dna2, flaps that become long enough to bind RPA cannot be properly processed, leading to genomic instability and cell death (23).In reconstitution of Okazaki fragment processing with purified proteins, even though some flaps became long enough to bind RPA, FEN1 was very effective at cleaving essentially all of the generated flaps (13, 14). Evidently, FEN1 could engage the flaps before binding of RPA. However, these reconstitution assays did not include the 5′-3′ helicase Pif1 (25, 26). Pif1 is involved in telomeric and mitochondrial DNA maintenance (26) and was first implicated in Okazaki fragment processing from genetic studies in S. cerevisiae. Deletion of PIF1 rescued the lethality of dna2Δ, although the double mutant was still temperature-sensitive (27). The authors of this report proposed that Pif1 creates a need for Dna2 by promoting longer flaps. Further supporting this conclusion, deletion of POL32, which encodes the subunit of pol δ that interacts with PCNA, rescued the temperature sensitivity of the dna2Δpif1Δ double mutant (12, 27). Importantly, pol δ exhibited reduced strand displacement activity when POL32 was deleted (12, 28, 29). The combination of pif1Δ and pol32Δ is believed to create a situation in which virtually no long flaps are formed, eliminating the requirement for Dna2 flap cleavage (27).We recently performed reconstitution assays showing that Pif1 can assist in the creation of long flaps. Inclusion of Pif1, in the absence of RPA, increased the proportion of flaps that lengthened to ∼28–32 nt before FEN1 cleavage (14). With the addition of RPA, the appearance of these long flap cleavage products was suppressed. Evidently, Pif1 promoted such rapid flap lengthening that RPA bound some flaps before FEN1 and inhibited cleavage. The RPA-bound flaps would presumably require cleavage by Dna2 for proper processing.Only a small fraction of flaps became long with Pif1. However, there are hundreds of thousands of Okazaki fragments processed per replication cycle (30). Therefore, thousands of flaps are expected to be lengthened by Pif1 in vivo, a number significant enough that improper processing of such flaps could lead to cell death.Our goal here was to determine whether Pif1 can influence the flow of Okazaki fragments through the two proposed pathways. We first questioned whether Pif1 stimulates strand displacement synthesis by pol δ. Next, we asked whether Pif1 lengthens short flaps so that Dna2 can bind and cleave. Finally, we used a complete reconstitution system to determine whether Pif1 promotes creation of RPA-bound flaps that require cleavage by both Dna2 and FEN1 before they can be ligated. Our results suggest that Pif1 promotes the two-nuclease pathway, and reveal the mechanisms involved.     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.