TUNEL vision spots apoptotic cells

RanGTP is known to regulate the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC), but the underlying molecular mechanism is unclear. BuGZ stabilizes SAC protein Bub3 through direct interaction and facilitates its mitotic function. Here we show that RanGTP promotes the turnover of BuGZ and Bub3 in metaphase, which in turn facilitates metaphase-to-anaphase transition. BuGZ and Bub3 interact with either importin-β or an E3 ubiquitin ligase, Ubr5. RanGTP promotes the dissociation of importin-β from BuGZ and Bub3 in metaphase. This results in increased binding of BuGZ and Bub3 to Ubr5, leading to ubiquitination and subsequent turnover of both proteins. We propose that elevated metaphase RanGTP levels use Ubr5 to couple overall chromosome congression to SAC silencing.     

Splicing function of mitotic regulators links R-loop–mediated DNA damage to tumor cell killing

Although studies suggest that perturbing mitotic progression leads to DNA damage and p53 activation, which in turn lead to either cell apoptosis or senescence, it remains unclear how mitotic defects trigger p53 activation. We show that BuGZ and Bub3, which are two mitotic regulators localized in the interphase nucleus, interact with the splicing machinery and are required for pre-mRNA splicing. Similar to inhibition of RNA splicing by pladienolide B, depletion of either BuGZ or Bub3 led to increased formation of RNA–DNA hybrids (R-loops), which led to DNA damage and p53 activation in both human tumor cells and primary cells. Thus, R-loop–mediated DNA damage and p53 activation offer a mechanistic explanation for apoptosis of cancer cells and senescence of primary cells upon disruption of the dual-function mitotic regulators. This demonstrates the importance of understanding the full range of functions of mitotic regulators to develop antitumor drugs.     

Dual-functional significance of ATM-mediated phosphorylation of spindle assembly checkpoint component Bub3 in mitosis and the DNA damage response

Both the DNA damage response (DDR) and the mitotic checkpoint are critical for the maintenance of genomic stability. Among proteins involved in these processes, the ataxia–telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase is required for both activation of the DDR and the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC). In mitosis without DNA damage, the enzymatic activity of ATM is enhanced; however, substrates of ATM in mitosis are unknown. Using stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture mass spectrometry analysis, we identified a number of proteins that can potentially be phosphorylated by ATM during mitosis. This list is highly enriched in proteins involved in cell cycle regulation and the DDR. Among them, we further validated that ATM phosphorylated budding uninhibited by benzimidazoles 3 (Bub3), a major component of the SAC, on serine 135 (Ser135) both in vitro and in vivo. During mitosis, this phosphorylation promoted activation of another SAC component, benzimidazoles 1. Mutation of Bub3 Ser135 to alanine led to a defect in SAC activation. Furthermore, we found that ATM-mediated phosphorylation of Bub3 on Ser135 was also induced by ionizing radiation-induced DNA damage. However, this event resulted in independent signaling involving interaction with the Ku70–Ku80–DNA-PKcs sensor/kinase complex, leading to efficient nonhomologous end-joining repair. Taken together, we highlight the functional significance of the crosstalk between the kinetochore-oriented signal and double-strand break repair pathways via ATM phosphorylation of Bub3 on Ser135.     

Localization of the Drosophila checkpoint control protein Bub3 to the kinetochore requires Bub1 but not Zw10 or Rod

We report here the isolation and molecular characterization of the Drosophila homolog of the mitotic checkpoint control protein Bub3. The Drosophila Bub3 protein is associated with the centromere/kinetochore of chromosomes in larval neuroblasts whose spindle assembly checkpoints have been activated by incubation with the microtubule-depolymerizing agent colchicine. Drosophila Bub3 is also found at the kinetochore regions in mitotic larval neuroblasts and in meiotic primary and secondary spermatocytes, with the strong signal seen during prophase and prometaphase becoming increasingly weaker after the chromosomes have aligned at the metaphase plate. We further show that the localization of Bub3 to the kinetochore is disrupted by mutations in the gene encoding the Drosophila homolog of the spindle assembly checkpoint protein Bub1. Combined with recent findings showing that the kinetochore localization of Bub1 conversely depends upon Bub3, these results support the hypothesis that the spindle assembly checkpoint proteins exist as a multiprotein complex recruited as a unit to the kinetochore. In contrast, we demonstrate that the kinetochore constituents Zw10 and Rod are not needed for the binding of Bub3 to the kinetochore. This suggests that the kinetochore is assembled in at least two relatively independent pathways. Received: 6 August 1998 / Accepted: 28 August 1998     

Role of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors in the Regulation of the Mitotic Checkpoint Kinase Bub1

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) monitors microtubule attachment to kinetochores to ensure accurate sister chromatid segregation during mitosis. The SAC members Bub1 and BubR1 are paralogs that underwent significant functional specializations during evolution. We report an in-depth characterization of the kinase domains of Bub1 and BubR1. BubR1 kinase domain binds nucleotides but is unable to deliver catalytic activity in vitro. Conversely, Bub1 is an active kinase regulated by intra-molecular phosphorylation at the P+1 loop. The crystal structure of the phosphorylated Bub1 kinase domain illustrates a hitherto unknown conformation of the P+1 loop docked into the active site of the Bub1 kinase. Both Bub1 and BubR1 bind Bub3 constitutively. A hydrodynamic characterization of Bub1:Bub3 and BubR1:Bub3 demonstrates both complexes to have 1:1 stoichiometry, with no additional oligomerization. Conversely, Bub1:Bub3 and BubR1:Bub3 combine to form a heterotetramer. Neither BubR1:Bub3 nor Knl1, the kinetochore receptor of Bub1:Bub3, modulate the kinase activity of Bub1 in vitro, suggesting autonomous regulation of the Bub1 kinase domain. We complement our study with an analysis of the Bub1 substrates. Our results contribute to the mechanistic characterization of a crucial cell cycle checkpoint.     

The Mouse Mitotic Checkpoint Gene Bub1b,a Novel Bub1 Family Member,Is Expressed in a Cell Cycle-Dependent Manner

A search for genes differentially expressed in normal and leukemic mouse thymocytes yielded a homolog of the yeast mitotic checkpoint protein Bub1. This novel protein (“mBub1b”) has 40% sequence similarity to the mouse Bub1 (“mBub1a”) previously described by Taylor and McKeon (1997,Cell 89,727–735) over four extended domains. Differences between the Bub1 sequences suggest that the two proteins may have different substrate specificities and that Bub1b alone has a putative “destruction” box that can target proteins for degradation by proteosomes during mitosis. Northern blots of normal tissues show that mouse Bub1a and Bub1b genes are expressed in thymus and spleen, but not in nondividing tissues. In synchronized cells, expression of both Bub1 genes is undetectable in G₁; Bub1 gene expression peaks in G₂/M with Bub1b delayed by 6 h relative to Bub1a. This cell cycle-dependent expression explains the tissue distribution and the abundance of Bub1 mRNAs in rapidly dividing cell lines. The human equivalent of mBub1b was isolated and mapped to chromosome 15q15. The existence in mammals of two separate Bub1 genes encoding distinct proteins, coupled with the different timing of peak expression, suggests that Bub1a and Bub1b have distinct roles in the mitotic checkpoint.     

Bub3 promotes Cdc20-dependent activation of the APC/C in S. cerevisiae

The spindle checkpoint ensures accurate chromosome segregation by sending a signal from an unattached kinetochore to inhibit anaphase onset. Numerous studies have described the role of Bub3 in checkpoint activation, but less is known about its functions apart from the spindle checkpoint. In this paper, we demonstrate that Bub3 has an unexpected role promoting metaphase progression in budding yeast. Loss of Bub3 resulted in a metaphase delay that was not a consequence of aneuploidy or the activation of a checkpoint. Instead, bub3Δ cells had impaired binding of the anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) with its activator Cdc20, and the delay could be rescued by Cdc20 overexpression. Kinetochore localization of Bub3 was required for normal mitotic progression, and Bub3 and Cdc20 colocalized at the kinetochore. Although Bub1 binds Bub3 at the kinetochore, bub1Δ cells did not have compromised APC/C and Cdc20 binding. The results demonstrate that Bub3 has a previously unknown function at the kinetochore in activating APC/C-Cdc20 for normal mitotic progression.     

Mitotic Accumulation of Dimethylated Lysine 79 of Histone H3 Is Important for Maintaining Genome Integrity During Mitosis in Human Cells

The loss of genome stability is an early event that drives the development and progression of virtually all tumor types. Recent studies have revealed that certain histone post-translational modifications exhibit dynamic and global increases in abundance that coincide with mitosis and exhibit essential roles in maintaining genomic stability. Histone H2B ubiquitination at lysine 120 (H2Bub1) is regulated by RNF20, an E3 ubiquitin ligase that is altered in many tumor types. Through an evolutionarily conserved trans-histone pathway, H2Bub1 is an essential prerequisite for subsequent downstream dimethylation events at lysines 4 (H3K4me2) and 79 (H3K79me2) of histone H3. Although the role that RNF20 plays in tumorigenesis has garnered much attention, the downstream components of the trans-histone pathway, H3K4me2 and H3K79me2, and their potential contributions to genome stability remain largely overlooked. In this study, we employ single-cell imaging and biochemical approaches to investigate the spatial and temporal patterning of RNF20, H2Bub1, H3K4me2, and H3K79me2 throughout the cell cycle, with a particular focus on mitosis. We show that H2Bub1, H3K4me2, and H3K79me2 exhibit distinct temporal progression patterns throughout the cell cycle. Most notably, we demonstrate that H3K79me2 is a highly dynamic histone post-translational modification that reaches maximal abundance during mitosis in an H2Bub1-independent manner. Using RNAi and chemical genetic approaches, we identify DOT1L as a histone methyltransferase required for the mitotic-associated increases in H3K79me2. We also demonstrate that the loss of mitotic H3K79me2 levels correlates with increases in chromosome numbers and increases in mitotic defects. Collectively, these data suggest that H3K79me2 dynamics during mitosis are normally required to maintain genome stability and further implicate the loss of H3K79me2 during mitosis as a pathogenic event that contributes to the development and progression of tumors.     

Molecular mechanism of Mad1 kinetochore targeting by phosphorylated Bub1

During metaphase, in response to improper kinetochore‐microtubule attachments, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) activates the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), an inhibitor of the anaphase‐promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C). This process is orchestrated by the kinase Mps1, which initiates the assembly of the MCC onto kinetochores through a sequential phosphorylation‐dependent signalling cascade. The Mad1‐Mad2 complex, which is required to catalyse MCC formation, is targeted to kinetochores through a direct interaction with the phosphorylated conserved domain 1 (CD1) of Bub1. Here, we present the crystal structure of the C‐terminal domain of Mad1 (Mad1^CTD) bound to two phosphorylated Bub1^CD1 peptides at 1.75 Å resolution. This interaction is mediated by phosphorylated Bub1 Thr461, which not only directly interacts with Arg617 of the Mad1 RLK (Arg‐Leu‐Lys) motif, but also directly acts as an N‐terminal cap to the CD1 α‐helix dipole. Surprisingly, only one Bub1^CD1 peptide binds to the Mad1 homodimer in solution. We suggest that this stoichiometry is due to inherent asymmetry in the coiled‐coil of Mad1^CTD and has implications for how the Mad1‐Bub1 complex at kinetochores promotes efficient MCC assembly.     

Bioinformatic search for plant homologs of the protein kinase Bub1—a key component of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint

The bioinformatic search identified 14 plant homologs of the mitotic spindle assembly checkpoint protein kinase Bub1 of animals, yeasts, and myxomycetes. It was demonstrated that the closest plant homologs of the protein kinase Bub1 were proteins with previously unknown features: XP_002274770.1 (CBI21878.1) from Vitis vinifera, EEC82122.1 from Oryza sativa Indica, EEE67244.1 from O. sativa Japonica, EEF44403.1 from Ricinus communis, and CAL57156.1 from Ostreococcus tauri. The simulation and analysis of spatial structures of the catalytic domains of the EEC82122.1, EEE67244.1, and XP_002274770.1 (CBI21878.1) proteins confirmed their conformity with the spindle assembly checkpoint protein kinases Bub1.     

Bub2 Is a Cell Cycle Regulated Phospho-Protein Controlled by Multiple Checkpoints

During mitotic exit, a small GTPase Tem1 needs to be activated. During most of the cell cycle, Tem1 activity is antagonized by a GTPase activating complex (GAP) composed of Bub2 and Bfa1. Bfa1 protein has cell cycle regulated phosphorylation depending upon the Polo-like kinase Cdc5. This phosphorylation dissociates Bfa1 from Tem1 and thus relieves the inhibition of Tem1 by the GAP complex. Bub2 and Bfa1 are also required to prevent mitotic exit when there is DNA damage, spindle damage or spindle misorientation at G2/M phase. While Cdc5 inhibits Bfa1/Bub2, mutating the Cdc5 phosphorylation sites on Bfa1 does not have a strong activating effect on Bub2/Bfa1, suggesting there must be additional regulation in this pathway. Here we report that Bub2 protein also has cell cycle regulated phosphorylation. This phosphorylation is partially dependent upon the Polo-like kinase Cdc5 and is consistent with negative regulation of the Bub2/Bfa1 GAP complex. Spindle damage or spindle misorientation prevents Bub2 phosphorylation. The spindle damage effect is dependent upon the spindle assembly checkpoint components Mad2 and Mps1. Thus like Bfa1, Bub2 protein is also controlled both during mitotic exit and in response to cell cycle checkpoints. Bub2 phosphorylation is likely to be controlled by a novel kinase.

Key Words:

Bub2, Bfa1, Cdc5, Phosphorylation, Mitotic exit, Cell cycle checkpoints     

ASH2L Regulates Ubiquitylation Signaling to MLL: trans-Regulation of H3 K4 Methylation in Higher Eukaryotes

1. Download : Download high-res image (146KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights? ASH2L WH motif is important for trans-regulation of H3 K4 methylation by H2Bub ? Ub stimulates MLL activity in trans, in contrast to DOT1L regulation by H2Bub ? H2Bub enhances MLL, but not MLL3, methyltransferase activity ? H2Aub directly represses MLL methyltransferase activity     

Spatial regulation of the spindle assembly checkpoint and anaphase‐promoting complex in Aspergillus nidulans

The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) plays a critical role in preventing mitotic errors by inhibiting anaphase until all kinetochores are correctly attached to spindle microtubules. In spite of the economic and medical importance of filamentous fungi, relatively little is known about the behavior of SAC proteins in these organisms. In our efforts to understand the role of γ‐tubulin in cell cycle regulation, we have created functional fluorescent protein fusions of four SAC proteins in Aspergillus nidulans, the homologs of Mad2, Mps1, Bub1/BubR1 and Bub3. Time‐lapse imaging reveals that SAC proteins are in distinct compartments of the cell until early mitosis when they co‐localize at the spindle pole body. SAC activity is, thus, spatially regulated in A. nidulans. Likewise, Cdc20, an activator of the anaphase‐promoting complex/cyclosome, is excluded from interphase nuclei, but enters nuclei at mitotic onset and accumulates to a higher level in mitotic nuclei than in the surrounding nucleoplasm before leaving in anaphase/telophase. The activity of this critical cell cycle regulatory complex is likely regulated by the location of Cdc20. Finally, the γ‐tubulin mutation mipAD159 causes a nuclear‐specific failure of nuclear localization of Mps1 and Bub1/R1 but not of Cdc20, Bub3 or Mad2.