RNA editing

The term RNA editing describes those molecular processes in which the information content is altered in an RNA molecule. To date such changes have been observed in tRNA. rRNA and mRNA molecules of eukaryotes, but not prokaryotes. The demonstration of RNA editing in prokaryotes may only be a matter of time, considering the range of species in which the various RNA editing processes have been found. RNA editing occurs in the nucleus, as well as in mitochondria and plastids, which are thought to have evolved from prokaryotic-like endosymbionts. Most of the RNA editing processes, however, appear to be evolutionarily recent acquisitions that arose independently. The diversity of RNA editing mechanisms includes nucleoside modifications such as C to U and A to I deaminations, as well as non-templated nucleotide additions and insertions. RNA editing in mRNAs effectively alters the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein so that it differs from that predicted by the genomic DNA sequence.     

Natural,modified DNA bases

The four canonical bases that make up genomic DNA are subject to a variety of chemical modifications in living systems. Recent years have witnessed the discovery of various new modified bases and of the enzymes responsible for their processing. Here, we review the range of DNA base modifications currently known and recent advances in chemical methodology that have driven progress in this field, in particular regarding their detection and sequencing. Elucidating the cellular functions of modifications remains an ongoing challenge; we discuss recent contributions to this area before exploring their relevance in medicine.     

DEAD-box proteins from Escherichia coli exhibit multiple ATP-independent activities

DEAD-box proteins (DBPs) are a widespread class of ATP-dependent RNA helicases that play a key role in unwinding RNA duplexes. In recent years, certain DBPs have also been found to exhibit activities that do not require ATP. To gain a better understanding of prokaryotic RNA metabolism, we investigated whether Escherichia coli DBPs harbor any ATP-independent activities. We show that each of the four E. coli DBPs tested in this study can accelerate the association of cRNA molecules, can stimulate strand displacement, and can function as an RNA chaperone without utilizing ATP. To the best of our knowledge, these prokaryotic DBPs constitute the first examples of proteins that harbor each of these three activities. The identification of these auxiliary functions indicates that the E. coli DBPs are versatile factors that possess significant RNA remodeling activity in addition to their canonical RNA helicase activity and might therefore participate in a greater variety of cellular processes than has been previously appreciated.     

Hammerhead ribozymes to modulate telomerase activity of endometrial carcinoma cells.

Telomerase is an excellent target molecule for cancer therapy, though any effective agents have never been developed in human subjects. We designed a variety of hammerhead ribozymes against human telomerase RNA (hTR) and hTERT mRNA and studied their possibility as a tool for cancer therapy. To search promising target site of hTR, the catalytic actiuity of 3 kinds of hammerhead ribozymes was studied in cell-free system. They showed equivalent catalytic activity, but only 36-ribozyme, which was designed to cleave the template region of hTR, revealed telomerase inhibitory activity in an endometrial carcinoma cell line. Among hTERT-mRNA-targeted ribozymes, the ribozyme to cleave 13 nucleotides downstream from the 5'-end of hTERT mRNA (13-ribozyme) exhibited the strongest telomerase-inhibitory activity, and the ribozyme to cleave 59 nucleotides upstream from the poly(A) tail showed clear activity. Stable transfection studies confirmed that the 36-ribozyme as well as the 13-ribozyme suppressed telomerase. These observations suggest that the template region of hTR and 5'end of hTERT mRNA are promising target sites for ribozymes to reduce telomerase activity.     

Small nucleolar RNAs that guide modification in trypanosomatids: repertoire, targets, genome organisation, and unique functions

Small nucleolar RNAs constitute a family of newly discovered non-coding small RNAs, most of which function in guiding RNA modifications. Two prevalent types of modifications are 2'-O-methylation and pseudouridylation. The modification is directed by the formation of a canonical small nucleolar RNA-target duplex. Initially, RNA-guided modification was shown to take place on rRNA, but recent studies suggest that small nuclear RNA, mRNA, tRNA, and the trypanosome spliced leader RNA also undergo guided modifications. Trypanosomes contain more modifications and potentially more small nucleolar RNAs than yeast, and the increased number of modifications may help to preserve ribosome function under adverse environmental conditions during the cycling between the insect and mammalian host. The genome organisation in clusters carrying the two types of small nucleolar RNAs, C/D and H/ACA-like RNAs, resembles that in plants. However, the trypanosomatid H/ACA RNAs are similar to those found in Archaea and are composed of a single hairpin that may represent the primordial H/ACA RNA. In this review we summarise this new field of trypanosome small nucleolar RNAs, emphasising the open questions regarding the number of small nucleolar RNAs, the repertoire, genome organisation, and the unique function of guided modifications in these protozoan parasites.     

Exosome-mediated quality control: substrate recruitment and molecular activity

The eukaryotic exosome is a multisubunit complex that is mainly responsible for 3'-5' exonucleolytic degradation of RNAs, both in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. In this review we summarize the recent experiments that have provided information on the organisation, structure and activity of this large assembly. Interestingly, eukaryotic exosomes have been implicated in a large number of RNA degradation pathways including recently discovered RNA quality control mechanisms. A variety of cofactors have been shown to participate in substrate recruitment and/or assist exonucleolytic activities. Despite this avalanche of new results, further analyses will be required to improve our understanding of exosome regulation.     

Life without A tail: New formats of long noncoding RNAs

While most long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) appear indistinguishable from mRNAs, having 5′ cap structures and 3′ poly(A) tails, recent work has revealed new formats. Rather than taking advantage of the canonical cleavage and polyadenylation for their 3′ end maturation, such lncRNAs are processed and stablized by a number of other mechanisms, including the RNase P cleavage to generate a mature 3′ end, or capped by snoRNP complexes at both ends, or by forming circular structures. Importantly, such lncRNAs have also been implicated in gene expression regulation in mammalian cells. Here, we highlight recent progress in our understanding of the biogenesis and function of lncRNAs without a poly(A) tail.This paper is part of a directed issue entitled: The Non-coding RNA Revolution.     

Comprehensive evaluation of canonical versus Dicer-substrate siRNA in vitro and in vivo

Since the discovery of RNA interference (RNAi), researchers have identified a variety of small interfering RNA (siRNA) structures that demonstrate the ability to silence gene expression through the classical RISC-mediated mechanism. One such structure, termed "Dicer-substrate siRNA" (dsiRNA), was proposed to have enhanced potency via RISC-mediated gene silencing, although a comprehensive comparison of canonical siRNAs and dsiRNAs remains to be described. The present study evaluates the in vitro and in vivo activities of siRNAs and dsiRNAs targeting Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) and Factor VII (FVII). More than 250 compounds representing both siRNA and dsiRNA structures were evaluated for silencing efficacy. Lead compounds were assessed for duration of silencing and other key parameters such as cytokine induction. We identified highly active compounds from both canonical siRNAs and 25/27 dsiRNAs. Lead compounds were comparable in potency both in vitro and in vivo as well as duration of silencing in vivo. Duplexes from both structural classes tolerated 2'-OMe chemical modifications well with respect to target silencing, although some modified dsiRNAs demonstrated reduced activity. On the other hand, dsiRNAs were more immunostimulatory as compared with the shorter siRNAs, both in vitro and in vivo. Because the dsiRNA structure does not confer any appreciable benefits in vitro or in vivo while demonstrating specific liabilities, further studies are required to support their applications in RNAi therapeutics.     

Raman Spectroscopy: A Conformational Probe in Biochemistr

RNA localization, the enrichment of RNA in a specific subcellular region, is a mechanism for the establishment and maintenance of cellular polarity in a variety of systems. Ultimately, this results in a universal method for spatially restricting gene expression. Although the consequences of RNA localization are well-appreciated, many of the mechanisms that are responsible for carrying out polarized transport remain elusive. Several recent studies have illuminated the roles that molecular motor proteins play in the process of RNA localization. These studies have revealed complex mechanisms in which the coordinated action of one or more motor proteins can act at different points in the localization process to direct RNAs to their final destination. In this review, we discuss recent findings from several different systems in an effort to clarify pathways and mechanisms that control the directed movement of RNA.     

Molecular motors: directing traffic during RNA localization

RNA localization, the enrichment of RNA in a specific subcellular region, is a mechanism for the establishment and maintenance of cellular polarity in a variety of systems. Ultimately, this results in a universal method for spatially restricting gene expression. Although the consequences of RNA localization are well-appreciated, many of the mechanisms that are responsible for carrying out polarized transport remain elusive. Several recent studies have illuminated the roles that molecular motor proteins play in the process of RNA localization. These studies have revealed complex mechanisms in which the coordinated action of one or more motor proteins can act at different points in the localization process to direct RNAs to their final destination. In this review, we discuss recent findings from several different systems in an effort to clarify pathways and mechanisms that control the directed movement of RNA.     

Identification and partial characterization of a variant of human CXCR3 generated by posttranscriptional exon skipping

Chemokines are recognized as functionally important in many pathological disorders, which has led to increased interest in mechanisms related to the regulation of chemokine receptor (CKR) expression. Known mechanisms for regulating CKR activity are changes in gene expression or posttranslational modifications. However, little is known about CKR with respect to a third regulatory mechanism, which is observed among other seven-transmembrane receptor subfamilies, the concept of differential splicing or processing of heteronuclear RNA. We now report on the discovery of a variant human CKR, CXCR3, resulting from alternative splicing via exon skipping. The observed RNA processing entails a drastically altered C-terminal protein sequence with a predicted four- or five-transmembrane domain structure, differing from all known functional CKR. However, our data indicate that that this splice variant, which we termed CXCR3-alt, despite its severe structural changes still localizes to the cell surface and mediates functional activity of CXCL11.