Newspaper as a substrate for cellulolytic landfill bacteria

Five cellulolytic bacterial isolates ( Clostridium and Eubacterium spp.) from a methane-producing landfill were examined to determine their ability to utilize newspaper as a substrate for growth. Solubilization was poor with even the most actively cellulolytic bacteria. The major factor causing the low activity seemed to be that as much as 24% of the newspaper was composed of the high molecular weight polymer lignin, which exerts a protective effect on the attack of otherwise susceptible polymers. The presence of ink on heavily printed paper also reduced the rate of cellulose solubilization. Although the ink did not appear directly toxic to the bacteria it masked the surface of the paper, covering the cellulose fibres and preventing bacterial adhesion to the substrate. The action of the cellulolytic isolates was also strongly inhibited below the optimum growth temperature of 37°C.     

Media Reporting of Neuroscience Depends on Timing,Topic and Newspaper Type

The rapid developments in neuroscientific techniques raise high expectations among the general public and therefore warrant close monitoring of the translation to the media and daily-life applications. The need of empirical research into neuroscience communication is emphasized by its susceptibility to evoke misconceptions and polarized beliefs. As the mass media are the main sources of information about (neuro-)science for a majority of the general public, the objective of the current research is to quantify how critically and accurately newspapers report on neuroscience as a function of the timing of publication (within or outside of periods of heightened media attention to neuroscience, termed “news waves”), the topic of the research (e.g. development, health, law) and the newspaper type (quality, popular, free newspapers). The results show that articles published during neuroscience news waves were less neutral and more optimistic, but not different in accuracy. Furthermore, the overall tone and accuracy of articles depended on the topic; for example, articles on development often had an optimistic tone whereas articles on law were often skeptical or balanced, and articles on health care had highest accuracy. Average accuracy was rather low, but articles in quality newspapers were relatively more accurate than in popular and free newspapers. Our results provide specific recommendations for researchers and science communicators, to improve the translation of neuroscience findings through the media: 1) Caution is warranted during periods of heightened attention (news waves), as reporting tends to be more optimistic; 2) Caution is also warranted not to follow topic-related biases in optimism (e.g., development) or skepticism (e.g., law); 3) Researchers should keep in mind that overall accuracy of reporting is low, and especially articles in popular and free newspapers provide a minimal amount of details. This indicates that researchers themselves may need to be more active in preventing misconceptions to arise.