RNA Interference Knockdown of BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 in Maize Reveals Novel Functions for Brassinosteroid Signaling in Controlling Plant Architecture

Brassinosteroids (BRs) are plant hormones involved in various growth and developmental processes. The BR signaling system is well established in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice (Oryza sativa) but poorly understood in maize (Zea mays). BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1) is a BR receptor, and database searches and additional genomic sequencing identified five maize homologs including duplicate copies of BRI1 itself. RNA interference (RNAi) using the extracellular coding region of a maize zmbri1 complementary DNA knocked down the expression of all five homologs. Decreased response to exogenously applied brassinolide and altered BR marker gene expression demonstrate that zmbri1-RNAi transgenic lines have compromised BR signaling. zmbri1-RNAi plants showed dwarf stature due to shortened internodes, with upper internodes most strongly affected. Leaves of zmbri1-RNAi plants are dark green, upright, and twisted, with decreased auricle formation. Kinematic analysis showed that decreased cell division and cell elongation both contributed to the shortened leaves. A BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ETHYL METHANESULFONATE-SUPPRESSOR1-yellow fluorescent protein (BES1-YFP) transgenic line was developed that showed BR-inducible BES1-YFP accumulation in the nucleus, which was decreased in zmbri1-RNAi. Expression of the BES1-YFP reporter was strong in the auricle region of developing leaves, suggesting that localized BR signaling is involved in promoting auricle development, consistent with the zmbri1-RNAi phenotype. The blade-sheath boundary disruption, shorter ligule, and disrupted auricle morphology of RNAi lines resemble KNOTTED1-LIKE HOMEOBOX (KNOX) mutants, consistent with a mechanistic connection between KNOX genes and BR signaling.Brassinosteroids (BRs) are ubiquitous plant hormones that promote plant growth by regulating cell elongation and division (Clouse, 1996; Clouse et al., 1996). BRs have other diverse roles, including enhancing tracheary element differentiation, stimulating ATPase activity, controlling microtubule orientation, and controlling flowering time, fertility, and leaf development (Iwasaki and Shibaoka, 1991; Clouse et al., 1996; Li et al., 1996; Schumacher et al., 1999; Catterou et al., 2001; Oh et al., 2011). BRs also function in tolerance to both biotic and abiotic stresses such as extreme temperatures, drought, and pathogens (Krishna, 2003).Deficiencies in BR biosynthesis or signaling produce characteristic dwarf plant phenotypes (Clouse et al., 1996; Szekeres et al., 1996; Fujioka et al., 1997). Plant height is an important agricultural trait, as seen in the Green Revolution, where semidwarf mutants contributed to increased yields in small-grain crops (Salas Fernandez et al., 2009). BR-deficient dwarf rice (Oryza sativa) produced increased grain and biomass yields because the erect leaf habit allowed higher planting densities under field conditions (Sakamoto et al., 2006). In fact, Green Revolution Uzu barley (Hordeum vulgare) is based on a mutation of the UZU1 gene, which encodes a homolog of BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1), a BR receptor (Chono et al., 2003).Genes functioning in BR pathways have been identified by the analysis of dwarf mutants in several species, including Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and rice. Arabidopsis bri1 mutants are shortened, have reduced apical dominance, and are male sterile (Clouse et al., 1996). BRI1 encodes a Leu-rich repeat (LRR) receptor-like kinase that is located in the plasma membrane and contains an extracellular domain responsible for BR binding, a transmembrane sequence, and a cytoplasmic protein kinase domain (Li and Chory, 1997; Vert et al., 2005; Belkhadir and Chory, 2006). The island domain and subsequent LRR 22 are critical for BR binding (Kinoshita et al., 2005; Hothorn et al., 2011; She et al., 2011). Phosphorylation of the conserved residues Ser-1044 and Thr-1049 in the kinase activation loop activates the BRI1 kinase (Wang et al., 2005), while dephosphorylation of BRI1 by PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE2A inhibits its function (Wu et al., 2011).BRI1 is partially redundant in BR signaling with related BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-LIKE RECEPTOR KINASE (BRL) paralogs, both in Arabidopsis and rice. In Arabidopsis, even though null alleles of brl1 or brl3 did not show obvious phenotypic defects in shoots, they enhanced the developmental defects of a weak bri1-5 mutant. In contrast to ubiquitously expressed BRI1, BRL1, BRL2, and BRL3 are tissue specific, mostly expressed in vascular tissues, while BRL1 and BRL3 are also expressed in root apices (Caño-Delgado et al., 2004; Zhou et al., 2004; Fàbregas et al., 2013). Both BRL1 and BRL3 can bind brassinolide (BL; Caño-Delgado et al., 2004). In rice, OsBRI1 is similar to the Arabidopsis BRI1 gene, and phenotypes of OsBRI1 rice mutants include dwarf plants with shortened internodes, erect leaves that are twisted and dark green, and photomorphogenesis in the dark (Yamamuro et al., 2000). There are three BR receptors in rice as well, and while OsBRI1 is universally expressed in all organs, OsBRL1 and OsBRL3 are expressed mostly in roots (Nakamura et al., 2006).To date, two mutant genes of the BR biosynthetic pathway have been reported in maize (Zea mays). A classic dwarf mutant, nana plant1 (na1), has a mutation in a DE-ETIOLATED2 homologous gene, which encodes a 5α-reductase enzyme in the BR biosynthesis pathway (Hartwig et al., 2011), while the brassinosteroid-dependent1 (brd1) gene encodes brassinosteroid C-6 oxidase (Makarevitch et al., 2012). The maize BR-deficient mutants have shortened internodes, twisted, dark green, erect leaves, and feminized male flowers (Hartwig et al., 2011; Makarevitch et al., 2012). However, no genes in BR signaling have yet been reported in maize. Understanding BR signaling in maize might help improve this important crop for the production of biofuels, biomass, and grain yield. Here, we took a transgenic RNA interference (RNAi) approach to generate maize plants partially deficient for BRI1. These knockdown lines demonstrate that BRI1 functions are generally conserved in maize compared with other plant species, but they also exhibit unique phenotypes, suggesting either that maize possesses novel BR-regulated developmental processes or that aspects of maize morphology reveal processes not evident in other plants.     

Live Imaging of Inorganic Phosphate in Plants with Cellular and Subcellular Resolution

Despite variable and often scarce supplies of inorganic phosphate (Pi) from soils, plants must distribute appropriate amounts of Pi to each cell and subcellular compartment to sustain essential metabolic activities. The ability to monitor Pi dynamics with subcellular resolution in live plants is, therefore, critical for understanding how this essential nutrient is acquired, mobilized, recycled, and stored. Fluorescence indicator protein for inorganic phosphate (FLIPPi) sensors are genetically encoded fluorescence resonance energy transfer-based sensors that have been used to monitor Pi dynamics in cultured animal cells. Here, we present a series of Pi sensors optimized for use in plants. Substitution of the enhanced yellow fluorescent protein component of a FLIPPi sensor with a circularly permuted version of Venus enhanced sensor dynamic range nearly 2.5-fold. The resulting circularly permuted FLIPPi sensor was subjected to a high-efficiency mutagenesis strategy that relied on statistical coupling analysis to identify regions of the protein likely to influence Pi affinity. A series of affinity mutants was selected with dissociation constant values of 0.08 to 11 mm, which span the range for most plant cell compartments. The sensors were expressed in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), and ratiometric imaging was used to monitor cytosolic Pi dynamics in root cells in response to Pi deprivation and resupply. Moreover, plastid-targeted versions of the sensors expressed in the wild type and a mutant lacking the PHOSPHATE TRANSPORT4;2 plastidic Pi transporter confirmed a physiological role for this transporter in Pi export from root plastids. These circularly permuted FLIPPi sensors, therefore, enable detailed analysis of Pi dynamics with subcellular resolution in live plants.Phosphorus is an essential element that plants acquire and assimilate in the form of inorganic phosphate (Pi). This macronutrient is a component of numerous metabolites and macromolecules, including ATP, nucleic acids, and phospholipids, and serves key roles in energy transfer reactions, signal transduction processes, and regulation of enzyme activities. Of fundamental importance to plants, Pi also serves critical roles in photosynthesis as both a substrate for ATP synthesis through photophosphorylation and a regulator in the partitioning of fixed carbon between the starch and Suc biosynthetic pathways.In many soils, particularly those used for low-input agriculture, the amounts of Pi available to plants are limiting for growth and productivity (Vance et al., 2003). Most of the Pi in soils is unavailable, because it is immobilized through formation of insoluble complexes or exists in organic forms, such as phytate, that plants cannot use directly (Schachtman et al., 1998). As a result, concentrations of free Pi in soil solution range from 1 to 10 μm, whereas cells require Pi in the millimolar range (Bieleski, 1973).To acclimate to Pi limitation, plants have evolved mechanisms to enhance Pi acquisition and also, mobilize, recycle, and conserve internal stores. These mechanisms include secretion of organic acids and phosphatases (Vance et al., 2003), increased growth of lateral roots and root hairs (Bates and Lynch, 2000; Péret et al., 2011), production of high-affinity Pi transporters at the root-soil interface (Misson et al., 2004; Shin et al., 2004), formation of symbiotic association with mycorrhizal fungi, which enhances Pi scavenging capabilities (Javot et al., 2007), modification of metabolic pathways (Plaxton and Tran, 2011), and altered patterns of Pi translocation between organs and transport between subcellular compartments (Walker and Sivak, 1986; Mimura, 1999; Raghothama, 1999). Substantial insights have been gained into the underlying biochemical identities and regulatory strategies for such adaptive responses, including those related to sensing and signaling of Pi status (Rouached et al., 2010; Chiou and Lin, 2011; Plaxton and Tran, 2011; Jain et al., 2012; Liu et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2014). However, a thorough understanding of their respective mechanisms and how these are integrated is limited by the inability to assess intracellular Pi concentrations with high spatial and temporal resolution.Genetically encoded fluorescent sensors or biosensors have proven to be powerful tools for monitoring metabolites and ions in vivo, because their expression and subcellular targeting can be manipulated and fluorescence imaging is nondestructive (Lalonde et al., 2005; Okumoto et al., 2012). Sensor proteins are fusions of a ligand binding domain or protein with one or two fluorescent proteins (e.g. GFP and related variants). Sensors with a single fluorescent protein report ligand-dependent changes in conformation as changes in fluorescence intensity, whereas sensors with two fluorescent proteins can yield changes in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), which can be quantified through ratiometric imaging. FRET-based sensors have been used in live plants to assess a variety of analytes, including Glc, maltose, Suc, Gln, calcium, zinc, and pH (Deuschle et al., 2006; Chaudhuri et al., 2008, 2011; Kaper et al., 2008; Rincón-Zachary et al., 2010; Adams et al., 2012; Gjetting et al., 2012, 2013; Krebs et al., 2012).Gu et al. (2006) engineered a FRET-based Pi sensor named fluorescence indicator protein for inorganic phosphate (FLIPPi) that consists of a cyanobacterial inorganic phosphate binding protein (PiBP) fused to enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (eCFP) and enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (eYFP) and showed the use of one of these sensors for monitoring cytosolic Pi in cultured animal cells. In this study, we generated a series of second generation FLIPPi sensors that were modified and optimized for use in live plants. Substitution of eYFP with a circularly permuted (cp) form of the fluorescent protein Venus (cpVenus; Nagai et al., 2002, 2004) greatly increased the magnitude of Pi-dependent FRET responses. In keeping with the initial nomenclature, Pi sensors constructed with cpVenus were designated cpFLIPPi. We also used a targeted mutagenesis approach to obtain cpFLIPPi sensors with Pi binding affinities that spanned the physiological range of most cell compartments and expressed these in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Confocal microscopy coupled with ratiometric analysis or acceptor photobleaching detected changes in cytosolic Pi levels in root epidermal cells in response to Pi starvation, and these changes were fully reversed by Pi replenishment. Plastid-localized versions of the same sensors expressed in wild-type plants and mutants lacking the PHOSPHATE TRANSPORT4;2 (PHT4;2) plastidic Pi transporter (Irigoyen et al., 2011) were used to confirm a role for this transporter in the export of Pi from root plastids. These results show the use of cpFLIPPi sensors for monitoring Pi distributions with both cellular and subcellular resolutions in live plants.     

An Overdose of the Arabidopsis Coreceptor BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE1 or Its Ectodomain Causes Autoimmunity in a SUPPRESSOR OF BIR1-1-Dependent Manner

The membrane-bound BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE1 (BAK1) is a common coreceptor in plants and regulates distinct cellular programs ranging from growth and development to defense against pathogens. BAK1 functions through binding to ligand-stimulated transmembrane receptors and activating their kinase domains via transphosphorylation. In the absence of microbes, BAK1 activity may be suppressed by different mechanisms, like interaction with the regulatory BIR (for BAK1-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE) proteins. Here, we demonstrated that BAK1 overexpression in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) could cause detrimental effects on plant development, including growth arrest, leaf necrosis, and reduced seed production. Further analysis using an inducible expression system showed that BAK1 accumulation quickly stimulated immune responses, even under axenic conditions, and led to increased resistance to pathogenic Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000. Intriguingly, our study also revealed that the plasma membrane-associated BAK1 ectodomain was sufficient to induce autoimmunity, indicating a novel mode of action for BAK1 in immunity control. We postulate that an excess of BAK1 or its ectodomain could trigger immune receptor activation in the absence of microbes through unbalancing regulatory interactions, including those with BIRs. Consistently, mutation of SUPPRESSOR OF BIR1-1, which encodes an emerging positive regulator of transmembrane receptors in plants, suppressed the effects of BAK1 overexpression. In conclusion, our findings unravel a new role for the BAK1 ectodomain in the tight regulation of Arabidopsis immune receptors necessary to avoid inappropriate activation of immunity.Plants rely on their innate immune system to detect microbes and mount an active defense against pathogens. The plant immune system is traditionally considered to be composed of two layers (Jones and Dangl, 2006). The first one is based on the activity of pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) that can detect microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) and trigger what is termed pattern-triggered immunity (PTI; Boller and Felix, 2009). Many plant pathogens can suppress this basal defense response using virulence factors termed effectors. In a second layer of defense, plants can make use of resistance (R) proteins to recognize the presence of pathogen effectors resulting in effector-triggered immunity (ETI), which resembles an accelerated and amplified PTI response (Jones and Dangl, 2006).Plants utilize plasma membrane-associated receptor-like proteins (RLPs) or receptor-like kinases (RLKs) as PRRs to sense specific signals through their ectodomains (Böhm et al., 2014). RLPs and RLKs require the function of additional RLKs to form active receptor complexes and transfer the external signal to the inside of the cells (Zhang and Thomma, 2013; Cao et al., 2014; Liebrand et al., 2014). The best-known coreceptor is the leucine-rich repeat (LRR)-RLK BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ASSOCIATED RECEPTOR KINASE1 (BAK1), which was originally identified as a positive regulator and partner for the brassinosteroid (BR) receptor BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1 (BRI1; Li et al., 2002; Nam and Li, 2002). BRs refer to phytohormones that promote plant growth and development (Fujioka and Yokota, 2003). Thus, loss-of-function mutations in BAK1 negatively impact Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) growth due to improper cell elongation. In short, bak1 mutants display compact rosettes with round-shaped leaves and shorter petioles and phenocopy weak bri1 mutations (Li et al., 2002; Nam and Li, 2002). Conversely, certain mutants affected in the BAK1 ectodomain show increased activity in the BR signaling pathway and share phenotypic similarities with BRI1-overexpressing lines (Wang et al., 2001), including elongated hypocotyls, petioles, and leaf blades and an overall increase in height (Jaillais et al., 2011; Chung et al., 2012).Furthermore, BAK1 is involved in the containment of cell death, independently of its function in BR signaling. Arabidopsis bak1 knockout mutants exhibit extensive cell death spreading after microbial infection (Kemmerling et al., 2007). In addition, spontaneous cell death develops in Arabidopsis double mutant plants lacking both BAK1 (also named SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE3 [SERK3]) and its closest homolog BAK1-LIKE1 (BKK1)/SERK4, causing seedling lethality even in the absence of microbes (He et al., 2007). Similar phenotypes are observed in Arabidopsis, rice (Oryza sativa), and Nicotiana benthamiana by lowering the expression of BAK1 and its homologs (Heese et al., 2007; Jeong et al., 2010; Park et al., 2011). Interestingly, typical defense responses, like the production of reactive oxygen species and constitutive callose deposition, are also detected in those plants, although the basis for this phenomenon remains poorly understood (He et al., 2007; Kemmerling et al., 2007; Park et al., 2011; Gao et al., 2013).On the other hand, BAK1 is widely studied as a key component of immune signaling pathways due to its known association with different PRRs, including RLKs and RLPs (Kim et al., 2013; Böhm et al., 2014). Upon MAMP perception, PRRs induce signaling and physiological defense responses like mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) activation, reactive oxygen species and ethylene production, and modifications in gene expression, all of which contribute to PTI. Among the best-studied examples of BAK1-regulated PRRs are two LRR-receptor kinases, ELONGATION FACTOR Tu RECEPTOR (EFR), which senses the active epitope elf18 of the bacterial elongation factor Tu, and the flagellin receptor FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2), which senses the active epitope flg22 of bacterial flagellin (Gómez-Gómez and Boller, 2000; Chinchilla et al., 2006; Zipfel et al., 2006). Immediately after flg22 binding to its LRR ectodomain, FLS2 forms a tight complex with BAK1 (Chinchilla et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2013). This heteromerization step may bring the two kinase domains closer and thereby induce, within seconds, the phosphorylation of BAK1 and FLS2 (Schulze et al., 2010; Schwessinger et al., 2011). These steps are sufficient to initiate the immune signaling pathway, even if the ectodomains and kinase domains are switched between FLS2 and BAK1 (Albert et al., 2013).While PRRs, such as FLS2 and EFR, are extremely sensitive to even subnanomolar concentrations of their ligands, a tight control of these receptors is expected, since constitutive activation of defense responses in plants dramatically impairs fitness and growth (Tian et al., 2003; Korves and Bergelson, 2004). However, the mechanisms that underlie the attenuation of PRR activation or prevent these receptors from signaling constitutively remain largely unknown (Macho and Zipfel, 2014). Several independent observations indicate that BAK1 and FLS2 are present in close spatial proximity in preformed complexes at the plasma membrane (Chinchilla et al., 2007; Schulze et al., 2010; Roux et al., 2011). Negative regulation of immune signaling prior to ligand perception could happen within the PRR complex and depend on conformational changes following the association of FLS2 with flg22 (Meindl et al., 2000; Schulze et al., 2010; Mueller et al., 2012). Additionally, other partners might prevent the constitutive interaction of BAK1 with FLS2. Such could be the case for the LRR-RLK BAK1-INTERACTING RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASEs (BIRs): BIR2 was recently discovered as a substrate and negative regulator for BAK1, while the absence of BIR1 leads to the activation of defense induction and strong dwarfism (Gao et al., 2009; Halter et al., 2014b). Furthermore, MAMP signaling may be constrained by phosphatases, as suggested in earlier studies (Felix et al., 1994; Gómez-Gómez et al., 2001) and recently shown for the protein phosphatase 2A, which controls PRR activation likely by modulating the BAK1 phosphostatus (Segonzac et al., 2014). These examples illustrate the variety of mechanisms that may tightly control BAK1 activity.In this work, we show that regulation of BAK1 accumulation is crucial for Arabidopsis fitness, as its overexpression leads to dwarfism and premature death. The phenotype differs from BR mutants and is very reminiscent of or even identical to the autoimmune phenotype of plants showing constitutive activation of R proteins (Oldroyd and Staskawicz, 1998; Bendahmane et al., 2002; Zhang et al., 2003). BAK1 overexpression is associated with constitutive activation of defense pathway(s) involving the general coregulator of RLPs, SUPPRESSOR OF BIR1-1 (SOBIR1; Liebrand et al., 2013, 2014). To our knowledge, this is the first report and comprehensive characterization of such an autoimmunity phenotype for Arabidopsis plants overexpressing BAK1, and it highlights the importance of the regulation of PTI overactivation.