Intermediates in the chaperonin-assisted refolding of rhodanese are trapped at low temperature and show a small stoichiometry.

In vitro refolding of the urea-unfolded, monomeric, mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese (thiosulfate sulfur-transferase; EC 2.8.1.1) is facilitated by the chaperonin proteins cpn60 and cpn10 from Escherichia coli at 37 degrees C, but the refolding is strongly inhibited at 10 degrees C. In contrast, the unassisted refolding of rhodanese is efficient at 10 degrees C, but the refolding efficiency decreases as the temperature is raised. These observations provided two measures of the cpn60-rhodanese complex. Thus, we monitored either 1) the cpn60-dependent inhibition of spontaneous folding at 10 degrees C or 2) the recovery of active rhodanese in the complete chaperonin system at 25 degrees C, after first forming a cpn60-rhodanese complex at 10 degrees C. These procedures minimized the aggregation of interactive folding intermediates that tend to overestimate the apparent number of cpn60 14-mers in determining the stoichiometry of protein-cpn60 14-mer interactions. Both procedures used here gave results that were consistent with there being 1 rhodanese binding site/cpn60 tetradecamer. This stoichiometry is significantly less than might be expected from the fact that cpn60 is composed of 14 identical subunits, and it may indicate that rhodanese interacts with a restricted region that is formed when the cpn60 tetradecamer is assembled. The ability to stabilize chaperonin-protein complexes that can subsequently be reactivated will aid studies of the mode of action of the ubiquitous chaperonin proteins.     

Purification and characterization of chaperonins 60 and 10 from Methylobacillus glycogenes

Two proteins belonging to the group I chaperonin family were isolated from an obligate methanotroph, Methylobacillus glycogenes. The two proteins, one a GroEL homologue (cpn60: M. glycogenes 60 kDa chaperonin) and the other a GroES homologue (cpn10: M. glycogenes 10 kDa chaperonin), composed a heteropolymeric complex in the presence of ATP. Both proteins were purified from crude extracts of M. glycogenes by anion-exchange (DEAE-Toyopearl) and gel-filtration (Sephacryl S-400) chromatography. The native molecular weights of each chaperonin protein as determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) gel-filtration were 820 000 for cpn60 and 65 000 for cpnl0. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis revealed that the subunit molecular weights of cpn60 and cpnl0 were 58 000 and 10 000, respectively. Both cpn60 and cpnl0 possessed amino acid sequences which were highly homologous to other group I chaperonins. M. glycogenes cpn60 displayed an ATPase activity which was inhibited in the presence of cpn10. The chaperonins also displayed an ability to interact with and facilitate the refolding of Thermus malate dehydrogenase and yeast enolase in a manner similar to that of GroEL/ES. The similarities between the Escherichia coli GroE proteins are discussed.     

The chaperonin assisted and unassisted refolding of rhodanese can be modulated by its N-terminal peptide

Thein vitro refolding of the monomeric, mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese (thiosulfate: cyanide sulfurtransferase, EC 2.8.1.1), which is assisted by theE. coli chaperonins, is modulated by the 23 amino acid peptide (VHQVLYRALVSTKWLAESVRAGK) corresponding to the amino terminal sequence (1–23) of rhodanese. In the absence of the peptide, a maximum recovery of active enzyme of about 65% is achieved after 90 min of initiation of the chaperonin assisted folding reaction. In contrast, this process is substantially inhibited in the presence of the peptide. The maximum recovery of active enzyme is peptide concentration-dependent. The peptide, however, does not prevent the interaction of rhodanese with the chaperonin 60 (cpn60), which leads to the formation of the cpn60-rhodanese complex. In addition, the peptide does not affect the rate of recovery of active enzyme, although it does affect the extent of recovery. Further, the unassisted refolding of rhodanese is also inhibited by the peptide. Thus, the peptide interferes with the folding of rhodanese in either the chaperonin assisted or the unassisted refolding of the enzyme. A 13 amino acid peptide (STKWLAESVRAGK) corresponding to the amino terminal sequence (11–23) of rhodanese does not show any significant effect on the chaperonin assisted or unassisted refolding of the enzyme. The results suggest that other sequences of rhodanese, in addition to the N-terminus, may be required for the binding of cpn60, in accord with a model in which cpn60 interacts with polypeptides through multiple binding sites.     

Chaperonin cpn60 from Escherichia coli protects the mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese against heat inactivation and supports folding at elevated temperatures.

The chaperonin protein cpn60 from Escherichia coli protects the monomeric, mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese (thiosulfate:cyanide sulfurtransferase, EC 2.8.1.1) against heat inactivation. The thermal inactivation of rhodanese was studied for four different states of the enzyme: native, refolded, bound to cpn60 in the form of a binary complex formed from unfolded rhodanese, and a thermally perturbed state. Thermal stabilization is observed in a range of temperatures from 25 to 48 degrees C. Rhodanese that had been inactivated by incubation at 48 degrees C, in the presence of cpn60 can be reactivated at 25 degrees C, upon addition of cpn10, K+, and MgATP. A recovery of about 80% was achieved after 1 h of the addition of those components. Thus, the enzyme is protected against heat inactivation and kept in a reactivable form if inactivation is attempted using the binary complex formed between rhodanese folding intermediate(s) and cpn60. The chaperonin-assisted refolding of urea-denatured rhodanese is dependent on the temperature of the refolding reaction. However, optimal chaperonin assisted refolding of rhodanese observed at 25 degrees C, which is achieved upon addition of cpn10 and ATP to the cpn60-rhodanese complex, is independent of the temperature of preincubation of the complex, that was formed previously at low temperature. The results are in agreement with a model in which the chaperonin cpn60 interacts with partly folded intermediates by forming a binary complex which is stable to elevated temperatures. In addition, it appears that native rhodanese can be thermally perturbed to produce a state different from that achieved by denaturation that can interact with cpn60.     

Chaperonin cofactors, Cpn10 and Cpn20, of green algae and plants function as hetero-oligomeric ring complexes

The chloroplast chaperonin system of plants and green algae is a curiosity as both the chaperonin cage and its lid are encoded by multiple genes, in contrast to the single genes encoding the two components of the bacterial and mitochondrial systems. In the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (Cr), three genes encode chaperonin cofactors, with cpn10 encoding a single ～10-kDa domain and cpn20 and cpn23 encoding tandem cpn10 domains. Here, we characterized the functional interaction of these proteins with the Escherichia coli chaperonin, GroEL, which normally cooperates with GroES, a heptamer of ～10-kDa subunits. The C. reinhardtii cofactor proteins alone were all unable to assist GroEL-mediated refolding of bacterial ribulose-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase but gained this ability when CrCpn20 and/or CrCpn23 was combined with CrCpn10. Native mass spectrometry indicated the formation of hetero-oligomeric species, consisting of seven ～10-kDa domains. The cofactor "heptamers" interacted with GroEL and encapsulated substrate protein in a nucleotide-dependent manner. Different hetero-oligomer arrangements, generated by constructing cofactor concatamers, indicated a preferential heptamer configuration for the functional CrCpn10-CrCpn23 complex. Formation of heptamer Cpn10/Cpn20 hetero-oligomers was also observed with the Arabidopsis thaliana (At) cofactors, which functioned with the chloroplast chaperonin, AtCpn60α(7)β(7). It appears that hetero-oligomer formation occurs more generally for chloroplast chaperonin cofactors, perhaps adapting the chaperonin system for the folding of specific client proteins.     

Reconstitution of higher plant chloroplast chaperonin 60 tetradecamers active in protein folding

Unlike the GroEL homologs of eubacteria and mitochondria, oligomer preparations of the higher plant chloroplast chaperonin 60 (cpn60) consist of roughly equal amounts of two divergent subunits, alpha and beta. The functional significance of these isoforms, their structural organization into tetradecamers, and their interactions with the unique binary chloroplast chaperonin 10 (cpn10) have not been elucidated. Toward this goal, we have cloned the alpha and beta subunits of the ch-cpn60 of pea (Pisum sativum), expressed them individually in Escherichia coli, and subjected the purified monomers to in vitro reconstitution experiments. In the absence of other factors, neither subunit (alone or in combination) spontaneously assembles into a higher order structure. However, in the presence of MgATP, the beta subunits form tetradecamers in a cooperative reaction that is potentiated by cpn10. In contrast, alpha subunits only assemble in the presence of beta subunits. Although beta and alpha/beta 14-mers are indistinguishable by electron microscopy and can both assist protein folding, their specificities for cpn10 are entirely different. Similar to the authentic chloroplast protein, the reconstituted alpha/beta 14-mers are functionally compatible with bacterial, mitochondrial, and chloroplast cpn10. In contrast, the folding reaction mediated by the reconstituted beta 14-mers is only efficient with mitochondrial cpn10. The ability to reconstitute two types of functional oligomer in vitro provides a unique tool, which will allow us to investigate the mechanism of this unusual chaperonin system.     

Differential effects of co-chaperonin homologs on cpn60 oligomers

In this study, we have investigated the relationship between chaperonin/co-chaperonin binding, ATP hydrolysis, and protein refolding in heterologous chaperonin systems from bacteria, chloroplast, and mitochondria. We characterized two types of chloroplast cpn60 oligomers, ch-cpn60 composed of α and β subunits (α₇β₇ ch-cpn60) and one composed of all β subunits (β₁₄ ch-cpn60). In terms of ATPase activity, the rate of ATP hydrolysis increased with protein concentration up to 60 μM, reflecting a concentration at which the oligomers are stable. At high concentrations of cpn60, all cpn10 homologs inhibited ATPase activity of α₇β₇ ch-cpn60. In contrast, ATPase of β₁₄ ch-cpn60 was inhibited only by mitochondrial cpn10, supporting previous reports showing that β₁₄ is functional only with mitochondrial cpn10 and not with other cpn10 homologs. Surprisingly, direct binding assays showed that both ch-cpn60 oligomer types bind to bacterial, mitochondrial, and chloroplast cpn10 homologs with an equal apparent affinity. Moreover, mitochondrial cpn60 binds chloroplast cpn20 with which it is not able to refold denatured proteins. Protein refolding experiments showed that in such instances, the bound protein is released in a conformation that is not able to refold. The presence of glycerol, or subsequent addition of mitochondrial cpn10, allows us to recover enzymatic activity of the substrate protein. Thus, in our systems, the formation of co-chaperonin/chaperonin complexes does not necessarily lead to protein folding. By using heterologous oligomer systems, we are able to separate the functions of binding and refolding in order to better understand the chaperonin mechanism.     

Image analysis by electron microscopy of two-dimensional crystals developed on a mercury surface of chaperonin from Thermus thermophilus.

Two-dimensional crystals of functional chaperonin molecules, which are protein complexes of cpn60 and cpn10, isolated from Thermus thermophilus were prepared on a mercury surface under oxygen atmosphere and were observed by electron microscope after transferring them to carbon coated specimen grids. The crystals showed the hexagonal lattice with unit cell dimensions of a = b = 12.4 nm and gamma = 120 degrees. The averaged image at a 3 nm resolution of the chaperonin has a doughnut-like shape which has seven peripheral masses and a central cavity. Preincubation of the chaperonin with MgATP changed the mobility in non-denaturating PAGE but did not cause distinguishable change of shape. The location of cpn10 in the chaperonin molecule is discussed.     

Assessment of plant chaperonin-60 gene function in Escherichia coli.

Brassica napus chaperonin-60 alpha and chaperonin-60 beta genes expressed separately and in combination produce three novel Escherichia coli strains: alpha, beta, and alpha beta. In beta and alpha beta cells, the plant gene products assemble efficiently into tetradecameric cpn60(14) species, including novel hybrids containing both bacterial and plant gene products. The levels of authentic groEL14 are reduced in these cells (Cloney, L. P., Wu, H. B., and Hemmingsen, S. M. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 23327-23332). The assembly of cyanobacterial ribulose-P2 carboxylase (rubisco) in E. coli requires the activities of the endogenous chaperonin proteins. Furthermore, the extent to which assembly occurs is limited by the normal levels of expression of the groE operon (Goloubinoff, P., Gatenby, A. A., and Lorimer, G. H. (1989) Nature 337, 44-47). We have now monitored the accumulation of cyanobacterial rubisco in E. coli alpha, beta, and alpha beta cells to assess the activity of the plant cpn60 gene products and effects on endogenous chaperonin functions. Expression of cpn-60 alpha alone did not enhance rubisco assembly, which is consistent with our previous observation that p60cpn-60 alpha required the presence of p60cpn-60 beta for assembly into cpn60(14) species. In contrast, expression of cpn-60 beta alone resulted in markedly enhanced rubisco assembly in cells that accumulated normal levels of both endogenous chaperonin polypeptides (groEL and groES). This demonstrates that assembled p60cpn-60 beta is functional as a chaperonin in E. coli. Co-expression of cpn-60 alpha and cpn-60 beta in cells with normal levels of expression of groES and groEL suppressed rubisco assembly. Increased expression of groES in cells in which cpn-60 alpha and cpn-60 beta were co-expressed relieved this suppression and resulted in enhanced rubisco assembly. Implications with respect to dependence of chloroplast cpn60 function on cpn10 are discussed.     

Significance of the N-terminal domain for the function of chloroplast cpn20 chaperonin

Chaperonins cpn60 and cpn10 are essential proteins involved in cellular protein folding. Plant chloroplasts contain a unique version of the cpn10 co-chaperonin, cpn20, which consists of two homologous cpn10-like domains (N-cpn20 and C-cpn20) that are connected by a short linker region. Although cpn20 seems to function like other single domain cpn10 oligomers, the structure and specific functions of the domains are not understood. We mutated amino acids in the "mobile loop" regions of N-cpn20, C-cpn20 or both: a highly conserved glycine, which was shown to be important for flexibility of the mobile loop, and a leucine residue shown to be involved in binding of co-chaperonin to chaperonin. The mutant proteins were purified and their oligomeric structure validated by gel filtration, native gel electrophoresis, and circular dichroism. Functional assays of protein refolding and inhibition of GroEL ATPase both showed (i) mutation of the conserved glycine reduced the activity of cpn20, whether in N-cpn20 (G32A) or C-cpn20 (G130A). The same mutation in the bacterial cpn10 (GroES G24A) had no effect on activity. (ii) Mutations in the highly conserved leucine of N-cpn20 (L35A) and in the corresponding L27A of GroES resulted in inactive protein. (iii) In contrast, mutant L133A, in which the conserved leucine of C-cpn20 was altered, retained 55% activity. We conclude that the structure of cpn20 is much more sensitive to alterations in the mobile loop than is the structure of GroES. Moreover, only N-cpn20 is necessary for activity of cpn20. However, full and efficient functioning requires both domains.     

Functional analysis of isolated cpn10 domains and conserved amino acid residues in spinach chloroplast co-chaperonin by site-directed mutagenesis

The possibilities of independent function of the two chaperonin 10 (cpn10) domains of the cpn10 homologue from spinach chloroplasts and the role of five conserved amino acid residues in the N-terminal cpn10 unit were investigated. Recombinant single domain proteins and complete chloroplast cpn10 proteins carrying amino acid exchanges of conserved residues in their N-terminal cpn10 domain were expressed in Escherichia coli and partially purified. The function of the recombinant proteins was tested using GroEL as chaperonin 60 (cpn60) partner for in vitro refolding of denatured ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase (Rubisco). Interaction with cpn60 was also monitored by the ability to inhibit GroEL ATPase activity. In vitro both isolated cpn10 domains were found to be incapable of co-chaperonin function. All mutants were also severely impaired in cpn10 function. The results are interpreted in terms of an essential role of the exchanged amino acid residues for the interaction between co-chaperonin and cpn60 partner and in terms of a functional coupling of both cpn10 domains.To test the function of mutant chloroplast cpn10 proteins in vivo the cpn10 deficiency of E. coli strain CG712 resulting in an inability to assemble -phage was exploited in a complementation assay. Transformation with plasmids directing the expression of mutant chloroplast cpn10 proteins in two cases restored -phage assembly in this bacterial strain to the same extent as did transformation with a plasmid encoding wild-type cpn10 protein. In contrast a plasmid encoded third mutant and truncated forms of chloroplast cpn 10 showed significantly reduced complementation efficiencies.     

Sulfhydryl modification ofE. coli cpn60 leads to loss of its ability to support refolding of rhodanese but not to form a binary complex

Differential chemical modification ofE. coli chaperonin 60 (cpn60) was achieved by using one of several sulfhydryl-directed reagents. For native cpn60, the three cysteines were accessible for reaction with N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), while only two of them are accessible to the larger reagent 4,4′-dipyridyl disulfide (4-PDS). However, no sulfhydryl groups were modified when the even larger reagents 5,5′-dithiobis-(2-nitrobenzoic acid) (DTNB) or 2-(4′-(iodoacetamido)anilino) naphthalene-6-sulfonic acid (IAANS), were employed, unless the chaperonin was unfolded. The cpn60 that had been covalently modified with NEM or IAANS, was not able to support the chaperonin-assisted refolding of the mitochondrial enzyme rhodanese, which also requires cpn10 and ATP hydrolysis. However, both modified forms of cpn60 were able to form binary complexes with rhodanese, as demonstrated by their ability to arrest the spontaneous refolding of the enzyme. That is, chemical modification with these sulfhydryl-directed reagents produced a species that was not prevented from interaction with partially folded rhodanese, but that was prevented from supporting a subsequent step(s) during the chaperonin-assisted refolding process.     

Cpn20: Siamese twins of the chaperonin world

The chloroplast cpn20 protein is a functional homolog of the cpn10 co-chaperonin, but its gene consists of two cpn10-like units joined head-to-tail by a short chain of amino acids. This double protein is unique to plastids and was shown to exist in plants as well plastid-containing parasites. In vitro assays showed that this cpn20 co-chaperonin is a functional homolog of cpn10. In terms of structure, existing data indicate that the oligomer is tetrameric, yet it interacts with a heptameric cpn60 partner. Thus, the functional oligomeric structure remains a mystery. In this review, we summarize what is known about this distinctive chaperonin and use a bioinformatics approach to examine the expression of cpn20 in Arabidopsis thaliana relative to other chaperonin genes in this species. In addition, we examine the primary structure of the two homologous domains for similarities and differences, in comparison with cpn10 from other species. Lastly, we hypothesize as to the oligomeric structure and raison d’être of this unusual co-chaperonin homolog. Electronic supplementary material  The online version of this article (doi:) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.     

Affinity purification of fusion chaperonin Cpn60-(His)(6) from thermophilic bacterium Bacillus strain MS and its use in facilitating protein refolding and preventing heat denaturation

The cpn60 gene from Bacillus strain MS, which is highly homologous to Bacillus stearothermophilus, was cloned. Cpn60 with a hexahistidine affinity tag (His)(6) fused to its C-terminus (cpn60-(His)(6)) was overproduced in Escherichia coli. Cpn60-(His)(6) was expressed in a soluble form in E. coli. and purified to homogeneity in a single step by nickel chelate affinity chromatography. Cpn60-(His)(6) formed a tetradecamer and had ATPase activity. Cpn60-(His)(6) mediated refolding of guanidine hydrochloride unfolded pig heart malic dehydrogenase (MDH) and Thermus flavus MDH at 25 and 70 degrees C, respectively, in an ATP-dependent manner. In addition, cpn60-(His)(6) prevented heat denaturation of pig heart MDH and T. flavus MDH at 30 and 80 degrees C, respectively, in an ATP-dependent manner. Therefore, cpn60-(His)(6) facilitates protein refolding and prevents heat denaturation of proteins across a wide temperature range.     

Location and flexibility of the unique C-terminal tail of Aquifex aeolicus co-chaperonin protein 10 as derived by cryo-electron microscopy and biophysical techniques

Co-chaperonin protein 10 (cpn10, GroES in Escherichia coli) is a ring-shaped heptameric protein that facilitates substrate folding when in complex with cpn60 (GroEL in E. coli). The cpn10 from the hyperthermophilic, ancient bacterium Aquifex aeolicus (Aacpn10) has a 25-residue C-terminal extension in each monomer not found in any other cpn10 protein. Earlier in vitro work has shown that this tail is not needed for heptamer assembly or protein function. Without the tail, however, the heptamers (Aacpn10del-25) readily aggregate into fibrillar stacked rings. To explain this phenomenon, we performed binding experiments with a peptide construct of the tail to establish its specificity for Aacpn10del-25 and used cryo-electron microscopy to determine the three-dimensional (3D) structure of the GroEL-Aacpn10-ADP complex at an 8-Å resolution. We found that the GroEL-Aacpn10 structure is similar to the GroEL-GroES structure at this resolution, suggesting that Aacpn10 has molecular interactions with cpn60 similar to other cpn10s. The cryo-electron microscopy density map does not directly reveal the density of the Aacpn10 25-residue tail. However, the 3D statistical variance coefficient map computed from multiple 3D reconstructions with randomly selected particle images suggests that the tail is located at the Aacpn10 monomer-monomer interface and extends toward the cis-ring apical domain of GroEL. The tail at this location does not block the formation of a functional co-chaperonin/chaperonin complex but limits self-aggregation into linear fibrils at high temperatures. In addition, the 3D variance coefficient map identifies several regions inside the GroEL-Aacpn10 complex that have flexible conformations. This observation is in full agreement with the structural properties of an effective chaperonin.     

Chaperonin 10 as an endothelial‐derived differentiation factor: Role of glycogen synthase kinase‐3

The anti‐inflammatory peptide early pregnancy factor/chaperonin 10 (cpn10) was identified by 2D‐electrophoresis/mass spectrometry as one of the proteins increased in human umbilical cord endothelial cells (HUVEC) after treatment with erythropoietin (EPO). EPO increased the amount of cpn10 released into the medium of HUVEC cultures, despite the absence of a secretory signal peptide. Although immunosupressive agents would represent an indirect advantage for red cell formation under conditions of infection and inflammation, it is possible that cpn10 may have direct effects on erythroid cells. We show that the chaperonin decreased cell proliferation in cultures of the erythroleukemia cell line K562 and increased the amounts of the erythroid differentiation markers glycophorin A and hemoglobin in TF‐1 cells. Nevertheless, cpn10 is not a specific erythroid cell differentiation factor, because monolayers of skin fibroblasts overexpressing cpn10 had significantly higher levels of the differentiation marker collagen I than normal fibroblasts. Nothing is known about the mechanism of action of cpn10 in its capacity as a general differentiation factor. An analysis of early changes taking place in K562 cells after incubation with cpn10 using antibody microarrays identified several phosphorylation events, including a decrease of GSK‐3α phosphorylation. Further studies in TF‐1 cells indicated that cpn10 decreased the phosphorylation of cofilin‐1 while stimulating that of GSK‐3β. Furthermore, glycophorin A production decreased in the presence of a GSK‐3 inhibitor in the same cells. These experiments support the idea that GSK‐3‐regulated signal transduction pathways are not only important for stem cell maintenance but may be involved in events controlling cell differentiation. J. Cell. Physiol. 219: 470–476, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Stress‐responsive accumulation of plastid chaperonin 60 during seedling development

Plastid chaperonin 60 (cpn60) is a chloroplast protein, presumed to assist in assembly and folding of plastid proteins. Although molecular chaperones often accumulate significantly in response to stress, this has never been demonstrated for cpn60. In this study, the accumulation of cpn60 in Nicotiana seedlings during their development was followed under different stress conditions. It was found that cpn60 accumulates markedly in developing seedlings in response to tentoxin and several other (but not all) stresses. Cpn60 accumulates only during a narrow period of seedling development. It is proposed that cpn60 accumulation under stress is developmentally regulated.     

Localization of a multifunctional chaperonin (GroEL protein) in nitrogen-fixing Anabaena PCC 7120

The occurrence and distribution of a multifunctional chaperonin-60 (cpn60), the GroEL protein, was demonstrated in the cyanobacterium Anabaena PCC 7120 by using a rabbit anti-GroEL (Escherichia coli) antibody. Western-blot analysis showed a distinct cross-reaction with a protein of approx. 65 kilodaltons, analogous to the Mr of the E. coli homologue. Immunocyto-chemical studies of vegetative cells showed that a chaperonin was localized in both vegetative cells and heterocysts. In vegetative cells cpn60 was primarily detected both in the carboxysomes, and in the cytoplasm, though mainly in the thylakoid region of the latter. In heterocysts, specialized cells for nitrogen fixation, the cpn60 label was prominent and was evenly distributed throughout the cell. These results support recent findings that chaperonins are multifunctional proteins, and extend those findings by demonstrating the occurrence of cpn60 in a prokaryotic cyanobacterium and by raising the possibility of the involvement of this chaperonin in the assembly of heterocystous proteins.Abbreviations cpn60 chaperonin-60 - Mr relative molecular mass - Rubisco ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase