Signaling, Actin Dynamics and Endocytosis

Endocytosis is an essential process for normal function of all living cells. Cells get nutrients, and control the surface-expressional level of proteins as well as membrane hemostats through the endocytosis. Endocytosis process is regulated in response to functional status of a particular cell. Signaling events and the endocytosis process go hand in hand to fulfill cellular functions. Although our understanding of the endocytosis process has grown rapidly during the last decade, little is known about how it is interconnected functionally with the signaling status of cells. During endocytosis, vesicles are formed from the plasma membrane through complex molecular machinery. The location where the vesicles are formed is rich in cortical actin cytoskeleton that supports the plasma membrane. To enter cells, vesicles have to diffuse through the cortical actin cytoskeleton. The actin cytoskeleton has a very dynamic structure and actively participates a wide variety of cellular functions. In addition to its central role in cytokinesis, cell shape, cell motility, and cell polarity, a connection between the endocytosis process and the actin cytoskeleton has been implicated in both yeast and mammalian system. In recent years the knowledge on how the actin cytoskeleton participates in the generation of coordinated cellular responses to external stimuli is grown rapidly. In this review, we focus on the potential roles of the actin cytoskeleton in regulating the endocytosis process in response to signaling events.     

Endocytosis and Signaling during Development

The development of multicellular organisms relies on an intricate choreography of intercellular communication events that pattern the embryo and coordinate the formation of tissues and organs. It is therefore not surprising that developmental biology, especially using genetic model organisms, has contributed significantly to the discovery and functional dissection of the associated signal-transduction cascades. At the same time, biophysical, biochemical, and cell biological approaches have provided us with insights into the underlying cell biological machinery. Here we focus on how endocytic trafficking of signaling components (e.g., ligands or receptors) controls the generation, propagation, modulation, reception, and interpretation of developmental signals. A comprehensive enumeration of the links between endocytosis and signal transduction would exceed the limits of this review. We will instead use examples from different developmental pathways to conceptually illustrate the various functions provided by endocytic processes during key steps of intercellular signaling.The evolution of multicellular life introduced a division of labor between specialized cells, which strongly increased demand for intercellular communication both during development and homeostasis of the adult organism (Kaiser 2001). At the genomic level this is reflected by a dramatic expansion of the surface receptor signalome in all metazoan lineages (Ben-Shlomo et al. 2003). However, the idea that intercellular communication drives the organization and patterning of the embryo precedes the identification of the responsible molecules. Induction (i.e., the ability of one group of cells within a developing organism to influence the cell-fate choices), morphogenesis, and differentiation of other cell populations, was firmly established by the experiments of Spemann and Mangold (1924) and has become one of the most important concepts of developmental biology. The related concept of the morphogen, whereby a cell can identify its position within a tissue by using the local levels of a secreted molecule forming a concentration gradient as a proxy for its distance from the source, was famously illustrated by the “French flag Model” by Wolpert (1969).Since then, examples of developmental patterning events following these two paradigms have been identified in all developmental model systems, ranging from worms and flies to amphibians, fish, and mice, and even humans. Surprisingly, despite the huge variety in the eventual outcome of metazoan embryonic development, it turned out that most individual patterning events are performed by a restricted set of signal-transduction pathways that are used repeatedly and in varying cellular contexts (Pires-daSilva and Sommer 2003; Perrimon et al. 2012).Because animal embryos differ in shape and size, closely related pathways must function over similarly varying spatial and temporal scales, potentially even at successive developmental stages within the same embryo. To understand how the limited, intercellular signaling repertoire is modulated to accommodate the varying patterning needs arising within the different developmental contexts, it is necessary to study the signal-transduction machinery at the molecular level. In recent years, major progress has been made in understanding the mechanistic links between the protein trafficking machinery and the generation and interpretation of morphogenetic signals.Traditionally, endocytosis was seen as a means of removing activated receptors and their bound ligands from the surface of the signal-receiving cells, thereby terminating the signals. However, positive effects of endocytosis on signal transduction have recently been identified for many different pathways including, among others, receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), TGF-β, TNF-α, Toll-like receptor, Wnt, and Notch signal-transduction cascades (Miaczynska et al. 2004; Platta and Stenmark 2011). In many of these examples, endosomes act as platforms where the activated receptors can interact with specific downstream components of the signal-transduction machinery (Sadowski et al. 2009; Miaczynska and Bar-Sagi 2010). Trafficking of the receptors into and out of such endosomes may thus provide another tier for the regulation of the signaling output that allows temporal and spatial modulation of the signals independent of ligand presentation. In addition, the endocytic pathway has recently also become implicated in signaling events that precede the intracellular transduction of the signal. In this review, we therefore focus on how the endocytic machinery participates in the generation, propagation, reception, and interpretation of intercellular signals in the context of animal development.     

Neuronal Signaling through Endocytosis

The distinctive morphology of neurons, with complex dendritic arbors and extensive axons, presents spatial challenges for intracellular signal transduction. The endosomal system provides mechanisms that enable signaling molecules initiated by extracellular cues to be trafficked throughout the expanse of the neuron, allowing intracellular signals to be sustained over long distances. Therefore endosomes are critical for many aspects of neuronal signaling that regulate cell survival, axonal growth and guidance, dendritic branching, and cell migration. An intriguing characteristic of neuronal signal transduction is that endosomal trafficking enables physiological responses that vary based on the subcellular location of signal initiation. In this review, we will discuss the specialized mechanisms and the functional significance of endosomal signaling in neurons, both during normal development and in disease.Endocytosis is a basic cellular process that has been conserved and adapted from single cell eukaryotes through humans (reviewed in Mellman 1996; Mukherjee et al. 1997). The fundamentals of endosomal recycling and degradation are the same in neurons as in other cell types (reviewed in Yap and Winckler 2012). However, the endocytic machinery is particularly important in neurons, as specialized vesicles are engaged in releasing neurotransmitters and in subsequent membrane retrieval (reviewed in Saheki and De Camilli 2012; von Zastrow and Williams 2012). Furthermore, endocytosis of neuronal growth factor receptors regulates where and when signaling cascades are initiated (reviewed in Hupalowska and Miaczynska 2012). Here we will discuss how the endocytic process in neurons is adapted so that vesicles can travel through the extensive span of neuronal axons and dendrites, and convey spatial information.     

The Role of Endocytosis during Morphogenetic Signaling

Morphogens are signaling molecules that are secreted by a localized source and spread in a target tissue where they are involved in the regulation of growth and patterning. Both the activity of morphogenetic signaling and the kinetics of ligand spreading in a tissue depend on endocytosis and intracellular trafficking. Here, we review quantitative approaches to study how large-scale morphogen profiles and signals emerge in a tissue from cellular trafficking processes and endocytic pathways. Starting from the kinetics of endosomal networks, we discuss the role of cellular trafficking and receptor dynamics in the formation of morphogen gradients. These morphogen gradients scale during growth, which implies that overall tissue size influences cellular trafficking kinetics. Finally, we discuss how such morphogen profiles can be used to control tissue growth. We emphasize the role of theory in efforts to bridge between scales.A fundamental challenge in biology is to understand how morphologies and complex patterns form in multicellular systems by the collective organization of many cells. Cells divide and undergo apoptosis, and they communicate via signaling pathways that use molecules as information carriers. In tissues, large-scale patterns of gene expression emerge from the coordinated signaling activity and response of many cells. The establishment of such patterns is often guided by long-range concentration profiles of morphogens. Cell divisions and cell rearrangements must be coordinated over large distances to achieve specific tissue sizes and shapes. To unravel how molecular processes and interactions can eventually be responsible for the formation of structures and patterns in tissues during development, it is important to study processes at different scales and understand how different levels of organization are connected. Such an approach becomes strongest if it involves a combination of quantitative experimental studies with theory.In the present article, we discuss several such approaches on different scales with a particular emphasis on theory. Starting from the kinetic and dynamic properties of endosomal networks inside a cell, we discuss transport processes in a tissue that can be related to kinetic trafficking parameters. Such transport processes are then responsible for the formation of graded morphogen concentration profiles. To permit scalable patterns in tissues of different sizes, it has been suggested that morphogen gradients scale during growth. This can be achieved on the tissue level by feedback systems that are sensitive to tissue size and regulate, for example, morphogen degradation. Finally, morphogen gradients that scale with tissue size can provide a system to robustly organize cell division in a large tissue and generate homogeneous growth. Theory can play an important role to bridge scales and understand how molecular and cellular processes can control pattern formation and tissue growth on larger scales.Morphogens are signaling molecules that are secreted in specific regions of developing tissues and can induce signaling activity far from their source. They typically form graded concentration profiles and therefore endow cells with positional information (cells can obtain information about their position in a tissue). Thus, they can guide cells to differentiate into complex morphological patterns. Morphogens also control cell growth and cell division. Because they control both patterning and growth, they may play a key role to coordinate these two processes. Such coordination is important because the size of morphological patterns must adjust during growth, whereas growth influences such patterns. A well-studied morphogen is Decapentaplegic (Dpp), which controls morphogenesis in the imaginal wing disc of developing Drosophila. Consequently, mutations in Dpp or defects in the trafficking pathways that control its graded concentration profiles and signaling affect the formation and structure of the adult wing.The study of morphogens was traditionally approached from a genetic perspective: Which gene products behave like morphogens? Which mutants affect patterning and growth? The realization that morphogens typically operate by a gradient of concentration raised the question of how morphogen gradients are generated. It became clear that the cellular trafficking of morphogens is a key issue for the generation of morphogen profiles. Morphogens are secreted ligands that bind receptors in the plasma membrane. The secretion of the ligands and the concentrations of receptor, ligand, and receptor/ligand complex at the plasma membrane are governed by their trafficking in the cell by vesicular transport. In particular, it was shown that trafficking through the endocytic pathway has an important impact on the formation of morphogen gradients (reviewed in Gonzalez-Gaitan 2003; see Bökel and Brand 2014). This is, to a large extent, how the cells respond to morphogens and contribute to set their local concentrations. To understand functions of morphogens in a tissue, we need to study how the gradient is formed. This, in turn, requires insights into morphogen trafficking through the endocytic pathway. The problem of morphogen behavior, therefore, becomes a problem spanning several levels of complexity: the organ level, the tissue level, the cell level, the organelle level, and the molecular level. Theoretical approaches motivated by physics combined with quantitative experimental approaches provide an ideal framework to understand how these different levels of complexity are intertwined.Two recent discoveries highlighted such integration. (1) The observation that profiles of the morphogen Dpp scale during growth, which implies that the rate of Dpp degradation mediated by the endocytic pathway of each of the cells in the tissue depends on the size of the overall tissue. This suggests that two levels of complexity are linked because cellular trafficking receives cues about the global tissue size. (2) As a result of the changes of the degradation rate that leads to gradient scaling, cells receive an increasing level of signaling. This, in turn, can be used by the cells to decide when to divide. This regulation again involves two levels of complexity because regulation at the endocytic pathway determines the growth properties of the tissue and, ultimately, its final size.In the following, we discuss quantitative approaches to study cellular signaling processes on different scales. Here, the aim is to understand how patterns on large scales can emerge during development from molecular processes and signaling pathways that involve endocytosis and cellular trafficking. We begin by describing trafficking of ligands in the endocytic pathway. We then consider the situation of a morphogen ligand and its impact in gradient formation. Subsequently, we discuss how gradient scaling might be realized. Finally, we discuss how such scaling processes play an important role in the regulation of morphogenetic growth.     

芸苔属植物自交不亲和性S-受体激酶的内吞作用及信号传递网络

文章就芸苔属植物自交不亲和性反应中S-受体激酶的内吞作用以及下游信号传递网络的研究进展作一综述。     

EphA2 Signaling Following Endocytosis: Role of Tiam1

Eph receptors and their membrane‐bound ligands, the ephrins, represent a complex subfamily of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). Eph/ephrin binding can lead to various and opposite cellular behaviors such as adhesion versus repulsion, or cell migration versus cell‐adhesion. Recently, Eph endocytosis has been identified as one of the critical steps responsible for such diversity. Eph receptors, as many RTKs, are rapidly endocytosed following ligand‐mediated activation and traffic through endocytic compartments prior to degradation. However, it is becoming obvious that endocytosis controls signaling in many different manners. Here we showed that activated EphA2 are degraded in the lysosomes and that about 35% of internalized receptors are recycled back to the plasma membrane. Our study is also the first to demonstrate that EphA2 retains the capacity to signal in endosomes. In particular, activated EphA2 interacted with the Rho family GEF Tiam1 in endosomes. This association led to Tiam1 activation, which in turn increased Rac1 activity and facilitated Eph/ephrin endocytosis. Disrupting Tiam1 function with RNA interference impaired both ephrinA1‐dependent Rac1 activation and ephrinA1‐induced EphA2 endocytosis. In summary, our findings shed new light on the regulation of EphA2 endocytosis, intracellular trafficking and signal termination and establish Tiam1 as an important modulator of EphA2 signaling .     

Kinin-Stimulated B1 Receptor Signaling Depends on Receptor Endocytosis Whereas B2 Receptor Signaling Does Not

Kinins are potent pro-inflammatory peptides that act through two G protein-coupled receptor subtypes, B1 (B1R) and B2 (B2R). Kinin-stimulated B2R signaling is often transient, whereas B1R signaling is sustained. This was confirmed by monitoring agonist-stimulated intracellular Ca²⁺ mobilization in A10 smooth muscle cells expressing human wild-type B2R and B1R. We further studied the role of receptor membrane trafficking in receptor-mediated phosphoinositide (PI) hydrolysis in model HEK293 cell lines stably expressing the receptors. Treatment of cells with brefeldin A, to inhibit maturation of de novo synthesized receptors, or hypertonic sucrose, to inhibit receptor endocytosis, showed that the basal cell surface receptor turnover was considerably faster for B1R than for B2R. Inhibition of endocytosis, which stabilized B1R on the cell surface, inhibited B1R signaling, whereas B2R signaling was not perturbed. Signaling by a B1R construct in which the entire C-terminal domain was deleted remained sensitive to inhibition of receptor endocytosis, whereas signaling by a B1R construct in which this domain was substituted with the corresponding domain in B2R was not sensitive. B2R and B1R co-expression, which also appeared to stabilize B1R on the cell surface, presumably by receptor hetero-dimerization, also inhibited B1R signaling, whereas B2R signaling was slightly enhanced. Furthermore, the B2R-specific agonist bradykinin (BK) directed both receptors through a common endocytic pathway, whereas the B1R-specific agonist Lys-desArg⁹-BK was unable to do so. These results suggest that B1R-mediated PI hydrolysis depends on a step in receptor endocytosis, whereas B2R-mediated PI hydrolysis does not. We propose that B1R uses at least part of the endocytic machinery to sustain agonist-promoted signaling.     

Endocytosis of Fgf8 Is a Double-Stage Process and Regulates Spreading and Signaling

Tightly controlled concentration gradients of morphogens provide positional information and thus regulate tissue differentiation and morphogenesis in multicellular organisms. However, how such morphogenetic fields are formed and maintained remains debated. Here we show that fibroblast growth factor 8 (Fgf8) morphogen gradients in zebrafish embryos are established and maintained by two essential mechanisms. Firstly, Fgf8 is taken up into the cell by clathrin-mediated endocytosis. The speed of the uptake rate defines the range of the morphogenetic gradient of Fgf8. Secondly, our data demonstrate that after endocytosis the routing of Fgf8 from the early endosome to the late endosome shuts down signaling. Therefore, intracellular endocytic transport regulates the intensity and duration of Fgf8 signaling. We show that internalization of Fgf8 into the early endosome and subsequent transport towards the late endosome are two independent processes. Therefore, we hypothesize that Fgf8 receiving cells control both, the propagation width and the signal strength of the morphogen.     

Lgl Regulates Notch Signaling via Endocytosis,Independently of the Apical aPKC-Par6-Baz Polarity Complex

1. Download : Download high-res image (249KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Akt Links Insulin Signaling to Albumin Endocytosis in Proximal Tubule Epithelial Cells

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has become an epidemic, causing a significant decline in quality of life of individuals due to its multisystem involvement. Kidney is an important target organ in DM accounting for the majority of patients requiring renal replacement therapy at dialysis units. Microalbuminuria (MA) has been a valuable tool to predict end-organ damage in DM but its low sensitivity has driven research efforts to seek other alternatives. Albumin is taken up by albumin receptors, megalin and cubilin in the proximal tubule epithelial cells. We demonstrated that insulin at physiological concentrations induce albumin endocytosis through activation of protein kinase B (Akt) in proximal tubule epithelial cells. Inhibition of Akt by a phosphorylation deficient construct abrogated insulin induced albumin endocytosis suggesting a role for Akt in insulin-induced albumin endocytosis. Furthermore we demonstrated a novel interaction between Akt substrate 160kDa (AS160) and cytoplasmic tail of megalin. Mice with type 1 DM (T1D) displayed decreased Akt, megalin, cubilin and AS160 expression in their kidneys in association with urinary cubilin shedding preceding significant MA. Patients with T1D who have developed MA in the EDC (The Pittsburgh Epidemiology of Diabetes Complications) study demonstrated urinary cubilin shedding prior to development of MA. We hypothesize that perturbed insulin-Akt cascade in DM leads to alterations in trafficking of megalin and cubilin, which results in urinary cubilin shedding as a prelude to MA in early diabetic nephropathy. We propose that utilization of urinary cubilin shedding, as a urinary biomarker, will allow us to detect and intervene in diabetic nephropathy (DN) at an earlier stage.     

Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Signaling by Endocytosis and Intracellular Trafficking

Ligand activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) leads to its rapid internalization and eventual delivery to lysosomes. This process is thought to be a mechanism to attenuate signaling, but signals could potentially be generated after endocytosis. To directly evaluate EGFR signaling during receptor trafficking, we developed a technique to rapidly and selectively isolate internalized EGFR and associated molecules with the use of reversibly biotinylated anti-EGFR antibodies. In addition, we developed antibodies specific to tyrosine-phosphorylated EGFR. With the use of a combination of fluorescence imaging and affinity precipitation approaches, we evaluated the state of EGFR activation and substrate association during trafficking in epithelial cells. We found that after internalization, EGFR remained active in the early endosomes. However, receptors were inactivated before degradation, apparently due to ligand removal from endosomes. Adapter molecules, such as Shc, were associated with EGFR both at the cell surface and within endosomes. Some molecules, such as Grb2, were primarily found associated with surface EGFR, whereas others, such as Eps8, were found only with intracellular receptors. During the inactivation phase, c-Cbl became EGFR associated, consistent with its postulated role in receptor attenuation. We conclude that the association of the EGFR with different proteins is compartment specific. In addition, ligand loss is the proximal cause of EGFR inactivation. Thus, regulated trafficking could potentially influence the pattern as well as the duration of signal transduction.     

The Coiled-Coil Domain of EHD2 Mediates Inhibition of LeEix2 Endocytosis and Signaling

Endocytosis has been suggested to be crucial for the induction of plant immunity in several cases. We have previously shown that two Arabidopsis proteins, AtEHD1 and AtEHD2, are involved in endocytosis in plant systems. AtEHD2 has an inhibitory effect on endocytosis of transferrin, FM-4-64, and LeEix2. There are many works in mammalian systems detailing the importance of the various domains in EHDs but, to date, the domains of plant EHD2 that are required for its inhibitory activity on endocytosis remained unknown. In this work we demonstrate that the coiled-coil domain of EHD2 is crucial for the ability of EHD2 to inhibit endocytosis in plants, as mutant EHD2 forms lacking the coiled-coil lost the ability to inhibit endocytosis and signaling of LeEix2. The coiled-coil was also required for binding of EHD2 to the LeEix2 receptor. It is therefore probable that binding of EHD2 to the LeEix2 receptor is required for inhibition of LeEix2 internalization. We also show herein that the P-loop of EHD2 is important for EHD2 to function properly. The EH domain of AtEHD2 does not appear to be involved in inhibition of endocytosis. Moreover, AtEHD2 influences actin organization and may exert its inhibitory effect on endocytosis through actin re-distribution. The coiled-coil domain of EHD2 functions in inhibition of endocytosis, while the EH domain does not appear to be involved in inhibition of endocytosis.     

NRP1 Presented in trans to the Endothelium Arrests VEGFR2 Endocytosis,Preventing Angiogenic Signaling and Tumor Initiation

1. Download : Download high-res image (88KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image