Effect of repeated presentation on sweetness intensity of binary and ternary mixtures of sweeteners

The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of repeated presentation of the same sweet stimulus on sweetness intensity ratings. The sweet stimuli tested in this study were binary and ternary blends of 14 sweeteners that varied widely in chemical structure. A trained panel evaluated the sweetness intensity over four sips of a given mixture presented at 30 s intervals. The individual components in the binary sweetener combinations were intensity-anchored with 5% sucrose, while the individual sweeteners in the ternary mixtures were intensity-anchored with 3% sucrose (according to formulae developed previously). Each self-mixture was also evaluated (e.g. acesulfame-K-acesulfame-K). The main finding of this study was that mixtures consisting of two or three different sweeteners exhibited less reduction in sweetness intensity over four repeated sips than a single sweetener at an equivalent sweetness level. Furthermore, ternary combinations tended to be slightly more effective than binary combinations at lessening the effect of repeated exposure to a given sweet stimulus. These findings suggest that the decline in sweetness intensity experienced over repeated exposure to a sweet stimulus could be reduced by the blending of sweeteners.     

POTENCY OF SWEETNESS OF ASPARTAME, D-TRYPTOPHAN AND THAUMATIN EVALUATED BY SINGLE VALUE AND TIME-INTENSITY MEASUREMENTS

Perceived sweetness of sucrose, aspartame, D-tryptophan and thaumatin in a sour, citric acid background was analyzed in terms of the potency of these compounds relative to sucrose-water combinations. Potencies of the sweeteners were determined from (1) maximum intensity using single value and time-intensity (T-I) measurements and (2) average intensity calculated as the ratio of area under the T-I curve and total perceived time. Stevens' law was applied to sweet responses, either in static or dynamic conditions. It was found that the exponent of the concentration-response function reflected the relative capacity of a compound to sweeten a given food and stressed differences of potency among sweeteners. Aspartame, D-tryptophan and thaumatin exhibited a decrease in sweetness potency relative to sucrose as sweetness increased from 10 to 100% of the full scale of response. Across the entire sweetness range, thaumatin showed the greatest potency but its long persistence time led to differentiate this intense sweetener from the other sweeteners evaluated.     

STEVIOSIDE AS A REPLACEMENT OF SUCROSE IN PEACH JUICE: SENSORY EVALUATION

The suitability of stevioside as a sweetener in peach juice was investigated. Comparison between stevioside and sucrose in terms of sweetness, sweet and bitter aftertastes were determined both in water and peach juice. The results demonstrated that 160 mg/L of stevioside may replace 34 g/L of sucrose in juice, with a 25% decrease in calories, without affecting the sensory characteristics of the product. Synergistic and inhibitory effects between sucrose and stevioside were also monitored at different stevioside concentration. A new juice formulation sweetened with a binary mixture of stevioside (160 mg/L) and sucrose (56 g/L) was not significantly different in terms of desirability from a reference product sweetened with 9% sucrose.     

AN OBJECTIVE NUMERICAL METHOD OF ASSESSING THE RELIABILITY OF TIME-INTENSITY PANELISTS

A measure of the reliability (T-IR) of time-intensity measurements was developed based on the concept of standard deviation as a measure of panelist variability. The T-IR measure was applied to time-intensity data collected from 10 panelists evaluating the sweetness of 4 model sweetener solutions on horizontal and vertical time-intensity line orientations. T-IR scores showed that the panelists were similarly reliable across the sweeteners and orientations. As well, independent of scale orientation, responses to sweeteners were similarly reliable. The T-IR measure can be used to maintain a high level of performance by monitoring time-intensity panelists. T-IR also provides an objective method of selecting panelists for time-intensity panels.     

The Effect of Sweeteners on Perceived Viscosity

Two different sweeteners, sucrose and aspartame, were matchedin perceived sweetness intensity. These solutions were thickenedwith carboxymethylcellulose to six different viscosity levels.Sucrose and aspartame appeared to decrease perceived viscosityof the solutions at a specific sweetener concentration, at allviscosity levels. However, in a second similar experiment withthree viscosity levels and seven sucrose concentrations no effectof sucrose concentration on perceived viscosity was found. Reasonsfor these conflicting results are discussed. No definite conclusionsabout the effect of sweeteners on perceived viscosity can asyet be drawn. Chem. Senses 20: 441–450, 1995.     

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of high-intensity sweeteners and sweetener mixtures

High intensity sweeteners were evaluated for sweetness and bitternessintensity using time-intensity scaling. Mean intensities of50:50 mixtures as well as the single sweeteners were used tocompute predicted scores which were compared to the observedscores as a means of evaluating additivity in the mixtures.Concentration-dependent effects of subadditivity, additivityand hyperadditivity were observed within some sweetener pairs,but these did not follow any consistent pattern across sweeteners.Synergy, a special case of hyperadditivity evaluated by comparingpredicted to observed scores, was seen in mixtures of aspartameand acesulfame-K at all concentrations. Aspartame/saccharinblends were synergistic only at the lowest concentration tested,despite the structural similarity between acesulfame-K and saccharin.Blends of sucrose/aspartame and acesulfame-K/saccharin did notexhibit synergy. Comparisons based on ratings of initial sweetnessrather than the whole time-intensity curve, reflected previousfindings of synergy in some sweetener pairs.     

FORMULATING A NEW PASSION FRUIT JUICE BEVERAGE WITH DIFFERENT SWEETENER SYSTEMS

The aim of this work was to optimize the acceptability of a natural passion fruit beverage using different levels of passion fruit pulp and sucrose, and to determine the equi-sweet concentrations of aspartame, sucralose, and a blend of 80% aspartame  +  20% acesulfame-K for the optimized formula. A 2² central composite design was used to optimize the acceptability of the sucrose-sweetened beverage, which was accessed using a 9-point structured hedonic scale. Acceptability data were fitted to a second-order model equation provided in the design. The selected pulp content and sucrose concentration were, respectively, 2.5 ° Brix and 10%. Measurements of sweetness equivalence were accomplished using two types of sensory methods: magnitude estimation and difference-from-control tests. The concentrations of aspartame, sucralose and a blend of 80% aspartame  +  20% acesulfame-K found as equi-sweet to 10% sucrose in the studied passion fruit beverage were, respectively, 0.043, 0.016 and 0.026%.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

This article deals with formulating a new passion fruit juice beverage with different sweetener systems. The research makes a very important contribution to the literature on sensory science used on product development by demonstrating the necessity to study the substitution of sucrose by high-intensity sweeteners every time a formulation is changed or a new product is developed.     

Selective inhibition of sweetness by the sodium salt of +/-2-(4-methoxyphenoxy)propanoic acid.

The purpose of this study was to determine the degree to which the sodium salt of +/-2-(4-methoxyphenoxy)propanoic acid (Na-PMP) reduced sweet intensity ratings of 15 sweeteners in mixtures. Na-PMP has been approved for use in confectionary/frostings, soft candy and snack products in the USA at concentrations up to 150 p.p.m. A trained panel evaluated the effect of Na-PMP on the intensity of the following 15 sweeteners: three sugars (fructose, glucose, sucrose), three terpenoid glycosides (monoammonium glycyrrhizinate, rebaudioside-A, stevioside), two dipeptide derivatives (alitame, aspartame), two N-sulfonylamides (acesulfame-K, sodium saccharin), two polyhydric alcohols (mannitol, sorbitol), 1 dihydrochalcone (neohesperidin dihydrochalcone), one protein (thaumatin) and one sulfamate (sodium cyclamate). Sweeteners were tested at concentrations isosweet with 2.5, 5, 7.5 and 10% sucrose in mixtures with two levels of Na-PMP: 250 and 500 p.p.m. In addition, the 15 sweeteners were tested either immediately or 30 s after a pre-rinse with 500 p.p.m. Na-PMP. In mixtures, Na-PMP at both the 250 and 500 p.p.m. levels significantly blocked sweetness intensity for 12 of the 15 sweeteners. However, when Na-PMP was mixed with three of the 15 sweeteners (monoammonium glycyrrhizinate, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and thaumatin), there was little reduction in sweetness intensity. Pre-rinsing with Na-PMP both inhibited and enhanced sweetness with the greatest enhancements found for monoammonium glycyrrhizinate, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone and thaumatin, which were not suppressed by Na-PMP in mixtures. The mixture data suggest that Na-PMP is a selective competitive inhibitor of sweet taste. The finding that pre-treatment can produce enhancement may be due to sensitization of sweetener receptors by Na-PMP.     

Individual differences in perceived bitterness predict liking of sweeteners

Although recent molecular studies suggest that only one receptorand one signaling pathway are involved in the perception ofsweetness, this seems to contradict everyday experience thatpeople not only have different likes and dislikes of certainsweeteners but also perceive the sweeteners differently. Onepossible explanation is that variation in liking of sweetenersis due, in part, to variation across individuals in sensitivityto nonsweet tastes, such as bitterness, which are transducedby a variety of receptors. Fifty individuals were asked to rateintensities of several taste attributes of 10 sweeteners andto give hedonic assessments of each sweetener. Additionally,their sensitivity to 6-n-propyl-3-thiouracil (PROP) was determined.Results indicated that when matched for sweetness, the perceptionof bitterness and the sweetener compound were the 2 largestfactors contributing to overall liking of a sweetener. Sensitivityto PROP did not contribute significantly to the model.     

Oral zinc sulfate solutions inhibit sweet taste perception

We investigated the ability of zinc sulfate (5, 25, 50 mM) to inhibit the sweetness of 12 chemically diverse sweeteners, which were all intensity matched to 300 mM sucrose [800 mM glucose, 475 mM fructose, 3.25 mM aspartame, 3.5 mM saccharin, 12 mM sodium cyclamate, 14 mM acesulfame-K, 1.04 M sorbitol, 0.629 mM sucralose, 0.375 mM neohesperidin dihydrochalcone (NHDC), 1.5 mM stevioside and 0.0163 mM thaumatin]. Zinc sulfate inhibited the sweetness of most compounds in a concentration dependent manner, peaking with 80% inhibition by 50 mM. Curiously, zinc sulfate never inhibited the sweetness of Na-cyclamate. This suggests that Na-cyclamate may access a sweet taste mechanism that is different from the other sweeteners, which were inhibited uniformly (except thaumatin) at every concentration of zinc sulfate. We hypothesize that this set of compounds either accesses a single receptor or multiple receptors that are inhibited equally by zinc sulfate at each concentration.     

REGIONAL VARIATION IN SWEET SUPPRESSION

Differences in the sweet‐blocking efficacy of 2‐(4‐methoxyphenoxy) propanoic acid (PMP) for different sweeteners (sucrose and aspartame) and for various exposure areas of the mouth were found. Twenty participants rated sweetener solutions with and without PMP for sweetness, sourness, saltiness, bitterness and umami for stimulation of anterior tongue, posterior tongue and whole‐mouth areas. For sweetness ratings, suppression was significant for all stimulation areas. In the presence of PMP, stimulation of the posterior tongue yielded significantly higher sweetness ratings than stimulation of the anterior tongue for aspartame but not for sucrose. Sourness and bitterness ratings were significantly higher for anterior tongue than posterior tongue stimulations for aspartame but not for sucrose. The increases in sourness ratings in the presence of PMP were likely because of the sour taste PMP has at the concentration used. Results imply a difference between the front and the back of the tongue in the mechanisms involved in the perception of sweetness.     

Synergism among ternary mixtures of fourteen sweeteners

The purpose of the present study was to determine the degree of synergism of sweet taste among ternary mixtures of 14 sweeteners. A trained panel evaluated ternary mixtures of 14 sweeteners varying in chemical structure and type. The ternary mixtures that were tested were limited to those in which the compounds comprising the mixture were synergistic in binary combinations, according to an earlier study. All sweeteners in the ternary mixtures were isointense with 2% sucrose, according to a previously developed formulae. Each self-mixture was also tested (e.g. 2% sucrose + 2% sucrose + 2% sucrose). The triad with the highest mean sweetness intensity rating was alitame-neohesperidin dihydrochalcone-rebaudioside-A (10.8). This represents an increase of 99.4% when compared with the average of the self-mixtures. While this is greater than the maximum of 74% increase found for binary mixtures, more dyadic combinations of sweeteners tested previously exhibited synergism than ternary combinations tested here. However, most ternary mixtures were synergistic (significantly greater than the average of the three self-mixtures) to some degree.     

Identification of novel sweet protein for nutritional applications

The prevalence of obesity and diabetes has increased exponentially in recent years around the globe, especially in India. Sweet proteins have the potential to substitute the sugars, by acting as natural, good and low calorie sweeteners. They also do not trigger a demand for insulin in diabetic patients unlike sucrose. In humans, the sweet taste perception is mainly due to taste-specific G protein-coupled heterodimeric receptors T1R2-T1R3. These receptors recognize diverse natural and synthetic sweeteners such as monelin, brazzein, thaumatin, curculin, mabinlin, miraculin and pentadin. Structural modeling of new sweetener proteins will be a great leap in further advancement of knowledge and their utility as sweeteners. We have explored the fingerprints of sweetness by studying the aminoacid composition and structure properties of the above proteins. The structural analysis of monellin revealed that the individual A or B chains of monellin are not contributing to its sweetness. However, the native conformation and ionic interaction between AspB7 of monellin with active site of T1R2-T1R3 receptor, along with hydrogen bonding stability of IleB6 and IleB8 are responsible for the sweet taste. Based on structural similarity search, we found a new hypothetical protein from Shewanella loihica, which has the presence of Asp(32) with adjacent isoleucine residues. Further, we examined the lead protein by two-step docking for the study of interaction of functionally conserved residues with receptors. The identified protein showed similar ionic and hydrophobic interactions with monelin. This gives a promising opportunity to explore this protein for potential health application in the low calorie sweetener industry viz., soft drinks, snacks, food, chocolate industries etc.     

Study of sweet taste evaluation using taste sensor with lipid/polymer membranes

The higher sensitivity for sweeteners can be achieved by newly developed lipid/polymer membranes. The membrane is composed of lipids such as phosphoric acid di-n-hexadecyl ester and tetradodecylammoniumbromid, and a plasticizer, dioctyl phenylphosphonate. As a result of changing electric charge of the membrane surface, the newly developed membrane shows 5-10 times higher sensitivity for sucrose than the conventional ones. We also applied the sensor to other sugars such as sugar alcohol which is used as alternative sweetness or food additives. The experimental results of other sweeteners relatively correspond to human sensory evaluation, though the sensitivity for some sugars need to be improved.     

Riboflavin-binding protein exhibits selective sweet suppression toward protein sweeteners

Riboflavin-binding protein (RBP) is well known as a riboflavin carrier protein in chicken egg and serum. A novel function of RBP was found as a sweet-suppressing protein. RBP, purified from hen egg white, suppressed the sweetness of protein sweeteners such as thaumatin, monellin, and lysozyme, whereas it did not suppress the sweetness of low molecular weight sweeteners such as sucrose, glycine, D-phenylalanine, saccharin, cyclamate, aspartame, and stevioside. Therefore, the sweet-suppressing activity of RBP was apparently selective to protein sweeteners. The sweet suppression by RBP was independent of binding of riboflavin with its molecule. Yolk RBP, with minor structural differences compared with egg white RBP, also elicited a weaker sweet suppression. However, other commercially available proteins including ovalbumin, ovomucoid, beta-lactogloblin, myoglobin, and albumin did not substantially alter the sweetness of protein sweeteners. Because a prerinse with RBP reduced the subsequent sweetness of protein sweeteners, whereas the enzymatic activity of lysozyme and the elution profile of lysozyme on gel permeation chromatography were not affected by RBP, it is suggested that the sweet suppression is caused by an interaction of RBP with a sweet taste receptor rather than with the protein sweeteners themselves. The selectivity in the sweet suppression by RBP is consistent with the existence of multiple interaction sites within a single sweet taste receptor.     

EFFECTS OF HEALTH-RELATED CLAIMS ON THE DIFFERENTIAL THRESHOLD OF CONSUMERS' SWEETNESS SENSATION

Health concerns play an important role in people's consumption of food products and judgments of food taste. Previous studies on the effects of food labeling suggest that consumers' sensory evaluations are influenced by health concerns. The current study examined whether health-related claims would affect sweetness sensations. Differential thresholds for sensitivity to sweetness were measured separately under three conditions: without health-related claims, with a label suggesting a health advantage and with a health warning label. Results indicated that thresholds under both health-related labeling conditions were lower than those under the condition with no health-related claim, suggesting that consumers exposed to health-related labels were more sensitive to sweetness. The threshold for the health advantage label lay between those for no health-related claims (which yielded the highest threshold) and the health warning (which yielded the lowest). These findings are discussed in terms of health concerns, and suggestions for future research are explored.

PRACTICAL APPLICATIONS

The insights gained in this study give researchers and marketers information about how to measure consumers' differential threshold of sweetness threshold with the psychophysical method. It provides information about the effects of health-related claims on the differential threshold of sweetness sensation. The findings and explanations are beneficial for product development researchers and marketer to predict consumers' change of differential threshold when employing health-related claims to influence sweetness sensation of food products with varying levels of sweetener changes.     

Expression of Plant Sweet Protein Brazzein in the Milk of Transgenic Mice

Sugar, the most popular sweetener, is essential in daily food. However, excessive sugar intake has been associated with several lifestyle-related diseases. Finding healthier and more economical alternatives to sugars and artificial sweeteners has received increasing attention to fulfill the growing demand. Brazzein, which comes from the pulp of the edible fruit of the African plant Pentadiplandra brazzeana Baill, is a protein that is 2,000 times sweeter than sucrose by weight. Here we report the production of transgenic mice that carry the optimized brazzein gene driven by the goat Beta-casein promoter, which specifically directs gene expression in the mammary glands. Using western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry, we confirmed that brazzein could be efficiently expressed in mammalian milk, while retaining its sweetness. This study presents the possibility of producing plant protein–sweetened milk from large animals such as cattle and goats.     

EFFECTS OF VISUAL MASKING TECHNIQUES ON THE INTENSITY RATING OF SWEETNESS OF GELATINS AND LEMONADES1

Visual masking techniques are frequently used to prevent panelists from discriminating among samples on the basis of color differences, only. The purpose of the study was to determine if these conditions alter the responses of the judges. Raspberry gelatins sweetened with 9, 10, 14 and 16% sucrose, respectively, and lemonades sweetened with 8, 10, 12 and 14% sucrose, respectively, were rated for perceived sweetness intensity using four different visual masking conditions (red lights, red glasses, dyes and blindfolds) and a white light and clear glasses control condition. Most of the visual masking techniques did not significantly affect the sweetness scores for the gelatins or lemonades. The one exception was the dye condition for the lemonades where the color (turquoise) probably affected the results.     

Limiting response alternatives in time-intensity scaling: an examination of the halo-dumping effect

Time-related measurements pose some challenges to psychophysicsand to applied sensory testing methods including control ofpsychological biases which have been found in single-point scaling.This research examined enhancement of ratings when responsealternatives were limited in time-intensity scaling tasks usingrepeated category ratings. Panelists rated a pseudo-beveragecontaining sweetener and flavor and one with sweetener onlyover a 90-s period. The aromatic flavor caused an increase insweetness intensity and especially so when the panelists werelimited to sweetness responses only. The odor-induced enhancementof sweetness was smaller when panelists were given both flavorand sweetness response options than when the panelists weregiven only a sweetness scale. Prior use of both scales in aprevious experimental session did not lessen the halo-dumpingenhancement effect. In one study, sweetness ratings of sucrosealone were depressed when the additional scale for flavor wasprovided, perhaps due to inappropriate partitioning of responses.