LIM factor Lhx3 contributes to the specification of motor neuron and interneuron identity through cell-type-specific protein-protein interactions

LIM homeodomain codes regulate the development of many cell types, though it is poorly understood how these factors control gene expression in a cell-specific manner. Lhx3 is involved in the generation of two adjacent, but distinct, cell types for locomotion, motor neurons and V2 interneurons. Using in vivo function and protein interaction assays, we found that Lhx3 binds directly to the LIM cofactor NLI to trigger V2 interneuron differentiation. In motor neurons, however, Isl1 is available to compete for binding to NLI, displacing Lhx3 to a high-affinity binding site on the C-terminal region of Isl1 and thereby transforming Lhx3 from an interneuron-promoting factor to a motor neuron-promoting factor. This switching mechanism enables specific LIM complexes to form in each cell type and ensures that neuronal fates are tightly segregated.     

Tandem LIM domains provide synergistic binding in the LMO4:Ldb1 complex

Nuclear LIM-only (LMO) and LIM-homeodomain (LIM-HD) proteins have important roles in cell fate determination, organ development and oncogenesis. These proteins contain tandemly arrayed LIM domains that bind the LIM interaction domain (LID) of the nuclear adaptor protein LIM domain-binding protein-1 (Ldb1). We have determined a high-resolution X-ray crystal structure of LMO4, a putative breast oncoprotein, in complex with Ldb1-LID, providing the first example of a tandem LIM:Ldb1-LID complex and the first structure of a type-B LIM domain. The complex possesses a highly modular structure with Ldb1-LID binding in an extended manner across both LIM domains of LMO4. The interface contains extensive hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions and multiple backbone-backbone hydrogen bonds. A mutagenic screen of Ldb1-LID, assessed by yeast two-hybrid and competition ELISA analysis, identified key features at the interface and revealed that the interaction is tolerant to mutation. These combined properties provide a mechanism for the binding of Ldb1 to numerous LMO and LIM-HD proteins. Furthermore, the modular extended interface may form a general mode of binding to tandem LIM domains.     

1H, 15N and 13C assignments of an intramolecular Lmo2-LIM2/Ldb1-LID complex

Lmo2 is a LIM-only protein involved in hematopoiesis and the development of T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Here we report backbone and side chain NMR assignments for an engineered intramolecular complex of the C-terminal LIM domain from Lmo2 tethered to the LIM interaction domain (LID) from LIM domain binding protein 1 (Ldb1).     

Interactions of the basic N-terminal and the acidic C-terminal domains of the maize chromosomal HMGB1 protein

Maize HMGB1 is a typical member of the family of plant chromosomal HMGB proteins, which have a central high-mobility group (HMG)-box DNA-binding domain that is flanked by a basic N-terminal region and a highly acidic C-terminal domain. The basic N-terminal domain positively influences various DNA interactions of the protein, while the acidic C-terminal domain has the opposite effect. Using DNA-cellulose binding and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we demonstrate that the N-terminal basic domain binds DNA by itself, consistent with its positive effects on the DNA interactions of HMGB1. To examine whether the negative effect of the acidic C-terminal domain is brought about by interactions with the basic part of HMGB1 (N-terminal region, HMG-box domain), intramolecular cross-linking in combination with formic acid cleavage of the protein was used. These experiments revealed that the acidic C-terminal domain interacts with the basic N-terminal domain. The intramolecular interaction between the two oppositely charged termini of the protein is enhanced when serine residues in the acidic tail of HMGB1 are phosphorylated by protein kinase CK2, which can explain the negative effect of the phosphorylation on certain DNA interactions. In line with that, covalent cross-linking of the two terminal domains resulted in a reduced affinity of HMGB1 for linear DNA. Comparable to the finding with maize HMGB1, the basic N-terminal and the acidic C-terminal domains of the Arabidopsis HMGB1 and HMGB4 proteins interact, indicating that these intramolecular interactions, which can modulate HMGB protein function, generally occur in plant HMGB proteins.     

A zyxin head-tail interaction regulates zyxin-VASP complex formation

Zyxin is an adhesion protein that regulates actin assembly by binding to VASP family members through N-terminal proline-rich motifs. Evidence suggests that zyxin’s C-terminal LIM domains function as a negative regulator of zyxin-VASP complexes. Zyxin LIM domains access to binding partners is negatively regulated by an unknown mechanism. One possibility is that zyxin LIM domains mediate a head-tail interaction, blocking interactions with other proteins. Such a mechanism might prevent both zyxin-VASP complexes activity and LIM domain access. In this report, the effect of LIM domains on zyxin-VASP complex assembly is defined. We find that zyxin LIM domains associate with zyxin’s VASP binding sites, preventing zyxin from binding to PKA-phosphorylated VASP. Unphosphorylated VASP overcomes the head-tail interaction, a result of a direct interaction with the LIM domain region. Zyxin, like a growing number of actin regulators, is controlled by intramolecular interactions.     

Identification of the key LMO2-binding determinants on Ldb1

The overexpression of LIM-only protein 2 (LMO2) in T-cells, as a result of chromosomal translocations, retroviral insertion during gene therapy, or in transgenic mice models, leads to the onset of T-cell leukemias. LMO2 comprises two protein-binding LIM domains that allow LMO2 to interact with multiple protein partners, including LIM domain-binding protein 1 (Ldb1, also known as CLIM2 and NLI), an essential cofactor for LMO proteins. Sequestration of Ldb1 by LMO2 in T-cells may prevent it binding other key partners, such as LMO4. Here, we show using protein engineering and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methodologies that LMO2 binds Ldb1 with a twofold lower affinity than does LMO4. Thus, excess LMO2 rather than an intrinsically higher binding affinity would lead to sequestration of Ldb1. Both LIM domains of LMO2 are required for high-affinity binding to Ldb1 (K(D) = 2.0 x 10(-8) M). However, the first LIM domain of LMO2 is primarily responsible for binding to Ldb1 (K(D) = 2.3 x 10(-7) M), whereas the second LIM domain increases binding by an order of magnitude. We used mutagenesis in combination with yeast two-hybrid analysis, and phage display selection to identify LMO2-binding "hot spots" within Ldb1 that locate to the LIM1-binding region. The delineation of this region reveals some specific differences when compared to the equivalent LMO4:Ldb1 interaction that hold promise for the development of reagents to specifically bind LMO2 in the treatment of leukemia.     

The level of DLDB/CHIP controls the activity of the LIM homeodomain protein apterous: evidence for a functional tetramer complex in vivo

The LIM homeodomain (LIM-HD) protein Apterous (Ap) and its cofactor DLDB/CHIP control dorso- ventral (D/V) patterning and growth of Drosophila wing. To investigate the molecular mechanisms of Ap/CHIP function we altered their relative levels of expression and generated mutants in the LIM1, LIM2 and HD domains of Ap, as well as in the LIM-interacting and self-association domains of CHIP. Using in vitro and in vivo assays we found that: (i) the levels of CHIP relative to Ap control D/V patterning; (ii) the LIM1 and LIM2 domains differ in their contributions to Ap function; (iii) Ap HD mutations cause weak dominant negative effects; (iv) overexpression of ChipDeltaSAD mutants mimics Ap lack-of-function, and this dominant negative phenotype is caused by titration of Ap because it can be rescued by adding extra Ap; and (v) overexpression of ChipDeltaLID mutants also causes an Ap lack-of-function phenotype, but it cannot be rescued by extra Ap. These results support the model that the Ap-CHIP active complex in vivo is a tetramer.