Auxin Resistant1 and PIN-FORMED2 Protect Lateral Root Formation in Arabidopsis under Iron Stress

A stunted root system is a significant symptom of iron (Fe) toxicity, yet little is known about the effects of excess Fe on lateral root (LR) development. In this work, we show that excess Fe has different effects on LR development in different portions of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root system and that inhibitory effects on the LR initiation are only seen in roots newly formed during excess Fe exposure. We show that root tip contact with Fe is both necessary and sufficient for LR inhibition and that the auxin, but not abscisic acid, pathway is engaged centrally in the initial stages of excess Fe exposure. Furthermore, Fe stress significantly reduced PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2)-green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in root tips, and pin2-1 mutants exhibited significantly fewer LR initiation events under excess Fe than the wild type. Exogenous application of both Fe and glutathione together increased PIN2-GFP expression and the number of LR initiation events compared with Fe treatment alone. The ethylene inhibitor aminoethoxyvinyl-glycine intensified Fe-dependent inhibition of LR formation in the wild type, and this inhibition was significantly reduced in the ethylene overproduction mutant ethylene overproducer1-1. We show that Auxin Resistant1 (AUX1) is a critical component in the mediation of endogenous ethylene effects on LR formation under excess Fe stress. Our findings demonstrate the relationship between excess Fe-dependent PIN2 expression and LR formation and the potential role of AUX1 in ethylene-mediated LR tolerance and suggest that AUX1 and PIN2 protect LR formation in Arabidopsis during the early stages of Fe stress.Iron (Fe) is an essential trace element for plants (Pilon et al., 2009), and species differ greatly in how much Fe they require for optimal growth (Wheeler and Power, 1995; Batty and Younger, 2003). As Fe is frequently limiting, Fe deficiency is more commonly studied than toxicity arising from excess Fe exposure (Lei et al., 2014; Bashir et al., 2015; Briat et al., 2015). Fe is also a major focus for efforts in biofortification by targeting Fe transporters (Zhai et al., 2014; Pinto and Ferreira, 2015). However, the excessive presence of Fe in soils is equally common, in particular in soils characterized by low pH and hypoxic or anoxic conditions (Connolly and Guerinot, 2002). Toxicity arising from excess Fe exposure is recognized as one of the major plant diseases attributable to abiotic factors that impact the development and yield potential in the world’s leading cereal crops, rice (Oryza sativa) and wheat (Triticum aestivum; Becker and Asch, 2005; Khabaz-Saberi et al., 2012). Understanding the mechanisms underlying excess Fe toxicity is therefore essential.Plastic responses in the plant’s root system architecture are known to constitute a major mechanism by which plants cope with fluctuating environments. Lateral roots (LRs), which typically comprise the majority of the root system, contribute pivotally to nutrient acquisition from soil, and modulating LR development is a very important avoidance strategy for plants when confronted with unfavorable edaphic conditions, such as high salinity or heavy metals (Ivanov et al., 2003). In the case of excess exposure to Fe, stunting of the root system is among the chief symptoms of toxicity (Becker and Asch, 2005). However, while some information has been emerging on the primary root axis (Li et al., 2015), the specific role of the plant’s LR apparatus remains poorly studied. Yamauchi and Peng (1995) reported retardation of root growth and a reduction in LR length and number under excess Fe conditions. Recently, Reyt et al. (2015) showed that excess Fe had no significant effect on LR initiation in the LR branching zone and that ferritins play an important role in LR emergence under excess Fe in this portion of the root, although the authors had not investigated LR development in the root portions near the growing tip of the primary root. Because LR initiation is restricted to specific pericycle cell files adjacent to a xylem pole in the basal region of the meristem (De Smet et al., 2007; Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009), and LR formation in this new growing root portion may be more susceptible to stress stimuli, such as observed with exposure to high NH₄⁺ and salt (Duan et al., 2013; Li et al., 2013), it is reasonable to suggest that modulation of LR formation near the growing tip of the primary root is critical to the response to excess Fe stress.In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the development of LRs proceeds through the following stages: lateral root primordia (LRP) initiation, establishment, emergence, activation into mature LRs, and final maintenance of LR elongation (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009; Péret et al., 2009). The hormones abscisic acid (ABA) and auxin are important internal negative and positive regulators during LR development, respectively (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009). ABA has been implicated in LRP emergence and meristem activation independent of auxin (De Smet et al., 2003). Auxin is an important internal positive regulator during LR development (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009), and auxin transport is critical (Blilou et al., 2005). Mutants in auxin efflux carriers such as PIN-FORMED (PIN) and P-Glycoprotein show significant defects in LR formation (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009; Péret et al., 2009). For example, LR initiation frequency was significantly reduced in pin2 and pin3 mutants (Dubrovsky et al., 2009), and PIN2 was also shown to be involved in exogenous and endogenous signal-mediated LR development (by brassinosteroid, jasmonate, and fungal challenge; Li et al., 2005; Felten et al., 2009; Sun et al., 2009). Similarly, Auxin Resistant1 (AUX1), an auxin influx carrier, also regulates LRP positioning and initiation (De Smet et al., 2007). While both AUX1 and PIN2 are required specifically for the basipetal transport of auxin through the outer root cell layers (Fukaki and Tasaka, 2009), PIN1 localized at the basal end of vascular cells is responsible for direct acropetal auxin flow in the root stele (Blilou et al., 2005). Recently, the roles of ethylene on LR development have also been highlighted, and the ethylene-mediated LR formation is dependent on the auxin pathway (Ivanchenko et al., 2008; Lewis et al., 2011). Ethylene treatment could mediate fluorescence of AUX1 and PIN2 fluorescent protein fusions at the root tip (Růzicka et al., 2007; Lewis et al., 2011). Although ABA, auxin, and ethylene signals have been implicated as important for LR development, it is not known whether and how the three hormones are involved in the response of LR formation to Fe stress.The previously described phenotypes and physiological processes related to Fe toxicity do not clarify the effect of excess Fe on LR formation. In this study, we employed the Arabidopsis wild type and ABA-, auxin-, and ethylene-related mutants to explore the LR formation response to Fe toxicity and to elucidate the roles of ABA, auxin, and ethylene. Potential mechanisms involved in the early stress response to Fe stress are discussed.     

HAPLESS13, the Arabidopsis μ1 Adaptin,Is Essential for Protein Sorting at the trans-Golgi Network/Early Endosome

In plant cells, secretory and endocytic routes intersect at the trans-Golgi network (TGN)/early endosome (EE), where cargos are further sorted correctly and in a timely manner. Cargo sorting is essential for plant survival and therefore necessitates complex molecular machinery. Adaptor proteins (APs) play key roles in this process by recruiting coat proteins and selecting cargos for different vesicle carriers. The µ1 subunit of AP-1 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) was recently identified at the TGN/EE and shown to be essential for cytokinesis. However, little was known about other cellular activities affected by mutations in AP-1 or the developmental consequences of such mutations. We report here that HAPLESS13 (HAP13), the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin, is essential for protein sorting at the TGN/EE. Functional loss of HAP13 displayed pleiotropic developmental defects, some of which were suggestive of disrupted auxin signaling. Consistent with this, the asymmetric localization of PIN-FORMED2 (PIN2), an auxin transporter, was compromised in the mutant. In addition, cell morphogenesis was disrupted. We further demonstrate that HAP13 is critical for brefeldin A-sensitive but wortmannin-insensitive post-Golgi trafficking. Our results show that HAP13 is a key link in the sophisticated trafficking network in plant cells.Plant cells contain sophisticated endomembrane compartments, including the endoplasmic reticulum, the Golgi, the trans-Golgi network (TGN)/early endosome (EE), the prevacuolar compartments/multivesicular bodies (PVC/MVB), various types of vesicles, and the plasma membrane (PM; Ebine and Ueda, 2009; Richter et al., 2009). Intracellular protein sorting between the various locations in the endomembrane system occurs in both secretory and endocytic routes (Richter et al., 2009; De Marcos Lousa et al., 2012). Vesicles in the secretory route start at the endoplasmic reticulum, passing through the Golgi before reaching the TGN/EE, while vesicles in the endocytic route start from the PM before reaching the TGN/EE (Dhonukshe et al., 2007; Viotti et al., 2010). The TGN/EE in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) is an independent and highly dynamic organelle transiently associated with the Golgi (Dettmer et al., 2006; Lam et al., 2007; Viotti et al., 2010), distinct from the animal TGN. Once reaching the TGN/EE, proteins delivered by their vesicle carriers are subject to further sorting, being incorporated either into vesicles that pass through the PVC/MVB before reaching the vacuole for degradation or into vesicles that enter the secretory pathway for delivery to the PM (Ebine and Ueda, 2009; Richter et al., 2009). Therefore, the TGN/EE is a critical sorting compartment that lies at the intersection of the secretory and endocytic routes.Fine-tuned control of intracellular protein sorting at the TGN/EE is essential for plant development (Geldner et al., 2003; Dhonukshe et al., 2007, 2008; Richter et al., 2007; Kitakura et al., 2011; Wang et al., 2013). An auxin gradient is crucial for pattern formation in plants, whose dynamic maintenance requires the polar localization of auxin efflux carrier PINs through endocytic recycling (Geldner et al., 2003; Blilou et al., 2005; Paciorek et al., 2005; Abas et al., 2006; Jaillais et al., 2006; Dhonukshe et al., 2007; Kleine-Vehn et al., 2008). Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) have also been recognized as major cargos undergoing endocytic trafficking, which are either recycled back to the PM or sent for vacuolar degradation (Geldner and Robatzek, 2008; Irani and Russinova, 2009). RLKs are involved in most if not all developmental processes of plants (De Smet et al., 2009).Intracellular protein sorting relies on sorting signals within cargo proteins and on the molecular machinery that recognizes sorting signals (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004; Dhonukshe et al., 2007). Adaptor proteins (AP) play a key role (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004) in the recognition of sorting signals. APs are heterotetrameric protein complexes composed of two large subunits (β and γ/α/δ/ε), a small subunit (σ), and a medium subunit (µ) that is crucial for cargo selection (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001). APs associate with the cytoplasmic side of secretory and endocytic vesicles, recruiting coat proteins and recognizing sorting signals within cargo proteins for their incorporation into vesicle carriers (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001). Five APs have been identified so far, classified by their components, subcellular localization, and function (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004; Hirst et al., 2011). Of the five APs, AP-1 associates with the TGN or recycling endosomes (RE) in yeast and mammals (Huang et al., 2001; Robinson, 2004), mediating the sorting of cargo proteins to compartments of the endosomal-lysosomal system or to the basolateral PM of polarized epithelial cells (Gonzalez and Rodriguez-Boulan, 2009). Knockouts of AP-1 components in multicellular organisms resulted in embryonic lethality (Boehm and Bonifacino, 2001; Robinson, 2004).We show here that the recently identified Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin AP1M2 (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013) is a key component in the cellular machinery mediating intracellular protein sorting at the TGN/EE. AP1M2 was previously named HAPLESS13 (HAP13), whose mutant allele hap13 showed male gametophytic lethality (Johnson et al., 2004). In recent quests for AP-1 in plants, HAP13/AP1M2 was confirmed as the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin based on its interaction with other components of the AP-1 complex as well as its localization at the TGN (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013). A novel mutant allele of HAP13/AP1M2, ap1m2-1, was found to be defective in the intracellular distribution of KNOLLE, leading to defective cytokinesis (Park et al., 2013; Teh et al., 2013). However, it was not clear whether HAP13/AP1M2 mediated other cellular activities and their developmental consequences. Using the same mutant allele, we found that functional loss of HAP13 (hap13-1/ap1m2-1) resulted in a full spectrum of growth defects, suggestive of compromised auxin signaling and of defective RLK signaling. Cell morphogenesis was also disturbed in hap13-1. Importantly, hap13-1 was insensitive to brefeldin A (BFA) washout, indicative of defects in guanine nucleotide exchange factors for ADP-ribosylation factor (ArfGEF)-mediated post-Golgi trafficking. Furthermore, HAP13/AP1M2 showed evolutionarily conserved function during vacuolar fusion, providing additional support to its identity as a µ1 adaptin. These results demonstrate the importance of the Arabidopsis µ1 adaptin for intracellular protein sorting centered on the TGN/EE.     

Focus Issue on the Plant Physiology of Global Change: A Nitrogen-Regulated Glutamine Amidotransferase (GAT1_2.1) Represses Shoot Branching in Arabidopsis

Shoot branching in plants is regulated by many environmental cues and by specific hormones such as strigolactone (SL). We show that the GAT1_2.1 gene (At1g15040) is repressed over 50-fold by nitrogen stress, and is also involved in branching control. At1g15040 is predicted to encode a class I glutamine amidotransferase (GAT1), a superfamily for which Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) has 30 potential members. Most members can be categorized into known biosynthetic pathways, for the amidation of known acceptor molecules (e.g. CTP synthesis). Some members, like GAT1_2.1, are of unknown function, likely involved in amidation of unknown acceptors. A gat1_2.1 mutant exhibits a significant increase in shoot branching, similar to mutants in SL biosynthesis. The results suggest that GAT1_2.1 is not involved in SL biosynthesis since exogenously applied GR24 (a synthetic SL) does not correct the mutant phenotype. The subfamily of GATs (GATase1_2), with At1g15040 as the founding member, appears to be present in all plants (including mosses), but not other organisms. This suggests a plant-specific function such as branching control. We discuss the possibility that the GAT1_2.1 enzyme may activate SLs (e.g. GR24) by amidation, or more likely could embody a new pathway for repression of branching.Shoot branching plays an important role in establishing plant body plans during development and growth, also conferring the flexibility for plants to respond to environmental stresses. The control of bud growth/branching has been studied for many decades with much interest stemming from its value in agriculture. Indeed, many of our domesticated crops have been bred for modified branching to optimize yields. In early studies, auxin synthesized in the shoot apex was proposed to act indirectly to inhibit bud outgrowth, while cytokinin (CK) synthesized in the roots promoted bud outgrowth (Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). Studies on auxin inhibition suggested there should be another signal mediating bud growth control (Hayward et al., 2009; Stirnberg et al., 2010; Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). In the past decade, studies in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and other plants have addressed this signal. Identification and characterization of mutants with increased branching in garden pea (Pisum sativum), Arabidopsis, rice (Oryza sativa), and Petunia hybrida demonstrated the existence of a long-distance signaling pathway that regulates shoot branching (Beveridge et al., 1996, 1997; Napoli, 1996; Stirnberg et al., 2002, 2007; Sorefan et al., 2003; Booker et al., 2004; Arite et al., 2007; Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008, 2010; Lin et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2009, 2011; Zhang et al., 2010). Later, studies on pea (Gomez-Roldan et al., 2008) and rice (Umehara et al., 2008) demonstrated unequivocally that this hormone (or its precursor) is strigolactone (SL). Currently, it is proposed that SL acts downstream of auxin to regulate bud outgrowth (Brewer et al., 2009). It is also likely that SL and auxin have the capacity to modulate each other’s levels and distribution in a dynamic feedback loop required for the branching control (Ferguson and Beveridge, 2009; Hayward et al., 2009; Stirnberg et al., 2010). The interaction between SL and CK during bud outgrowth is less understood, although recent studies in pea indicate that SL and CK act antagonistically on bud growth (Dun et al., 2012).Branching is also modulated in response to environmental conditions, including nutrient supply. Generally, nutrient deficiency in soil causes a reduction in shoot to root ratio, resulting in decreased shoot branching (Lafever, 1981). Under nitrogen or phosphate limitation, elevated levels of SL repress shoot branching in rice, tomato (Solanum lycopersicum), and Arabidopsis (Yoneyama et al., 2007; López-Ráez et al., 2008; Umehara et al., 2008, 2010; Kohlen et al., 2011), and possibly increase lateral root formation (Ruyter-Spira et al., 2011). This makes sense physiologically, diverting resources to roots from shoots to scavenge more nutrients. The basis for modulation of SL levels or nutrient-dependent branching control is not understood.Here, we report a novel gene, GAT1_2.1 (At1g15040), predicted to encode a class I Gln amidotransferase (GAT1) in Arabidopsis, is highly repressed by long-term nitrogen stress (down 57-fold), and that mutation of this gene leads to an enhanced branching phenotype. Thus, this gene may present a link between the nitrogen stress response and branching control.     

Salt Stress Reduces Root Meristem Size by Nitric Oxide-Mediated Modulation of Auxin Accumulation and Signaling in Arabidopsis

The development of the plant root system is highly plastic, which allows the plant to adapt to various environmental stresses. Salt stress inhibits root elongation by reducing the size of the root meristem. However, the mechanism underlying this process remains unclear. In this study, we explored whether and how auxin and nitric oxide (NO) are involved in salt-mediated inhibition of root meristem growth in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) using physiological, pharmacological, and genetic approaches. We found that salt stress significantly reduced root meristem size by down-regulating the expression of PINFORMED (PIN) genes, thereby reducing auxin levels. In addition, salt stress promoted AUXIN RESISTANT3 (AXR3)/INDOLE-3-ACETIC ACID17 (IAA17) stabilization, which repressed auxin signaling during this process. Furthermore, salt stress stimulated NO accumulation, whereas blocking NO production with the inhibitor N^ω-nitro-l-arginine-methylester compromised the salt-mediated reduction of root meristem size, PIN down-regulation, and stabilization of AXR3/IAA17, indicating that NO is involved in salt-mediated inhibition of root meristem growth. Taken together, these findings suggest that salt stress inhibits root meristem growth by repressing PIN expression (thereby reducing auxin levels) and stabilizing IAA17 (thereby repressing auxin signaling) via increasing NO levels.Due to agricultural practices and climate change, soil salinity has become a serious factor limiting the productivity and quality of agricultural crops (Zhu, 2007). Worldwide, high salinity in the soil damages approximately 20% of total irrigated lands and takes 1.5 million ha out of production each year (Munns and Tester, 2008). In general, high salinity affects plant growth and development by reducing plant water potential, altering nutrient uptake, and increasing the accumulation of toxic ions (Hasegawa et al., 2000; Munns, 2002; Zhang and Shi, 2013). Together, these effects severely reduce plant growth and survival.Because the root is the first organ to sense high salinity, salt stress plays a direct, important role in modulating root system architecture (Wang et al., 2009). For instance, salt stress negatively regulates root hair formation and gravitropism (Sun et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2008). The role of salt in lateral root formation depends on the NaCl concentration. While high NaCl levels inhibit lateral root formation, lower NaCl levels stimulate lateral root formation in an auxin-dependent manner (Zolla et al., 2010; Ji et al., 2013). The root meristem plays an essential role in sustaining root growth (Perilli et al., 2012). Salt stress inhibits primary root elongation by suppressing root meristem activity (West et al., 2004). However, how this inhibition occurs remains largely unclear.Plant hormones are important intermediary signaling compounds that function downstream of environmental stimuli. Among plant hormones, indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) is thought to play a fundamental role in root system architecture by regulating cell division, expansion, and differentiation. In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) root tips, a distal auxin maximum is formed and maintained by polar auxin transport (PAT), which determines the orientation and extent of cell division in the root meristem as well as root pattern formation (Sabatini et al., 1999). PINFORMED (PIN) proteins, which are components of the auxin efflux machinery, regulate primary root elongation and root meristem size (Blilou et al., 2005; Dello Ioio et al., 2008; Yuan et al., 2013, 2014). The auxin signal transduction pathway is activated by direct binding of auxin to its receptor protein, TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (TIR1)/AUXIN SIGNALING F-BOX (AFB), promoting the degradation of Aux/IAA proteins, releasing auxin response factors (ARFs), and activating the expression of auxin-responsive genes (Gray et al., 2001; Dharmasiri et al., 2005a; Kepinski and Leyser, 2005). Aux/IAA proteins are short-lived, nuclear-localized proteins that play key roles in auxin signal activation and root growth modulation (Rouse et al., 1998). Other hormones and stresses often regulate auxin signaling by affecting Aux/IAA protein stability (Lim and Kunkel, 2004; Nemhauser et al., 2004; Wang et al., 2007; Kushwah and Laxmi, 2014).Nitric oxide (NO) is a signaling molecule with diverse biological functions in plants (He et al., 2004; Fernández-Marcos et al., 2011; Shi et al., 2012), including important roles in the regulation of root growth and development. NO functions downstream of auxin during the adventitious rooting process in cucumber (Cucumis sativus; Pagnussat et al., 2002). Exogenous auxin-induced NO biosynthesis is associated with nitrate reductase activity during lateral root formation, and NO is necessary for auxin-induced lateral root and root hair development (Pagnussat et al., 2002; Lombardo et al., 2006). Pharmacological and genetic analyses in Arabidopsis indicate that NO suppresses primary root growth and root meristem activity (Fernández-Marcos et al., 2011). Additionally, both exogenous application of the NO donor sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and overaccumulation of NO in the mutant chlorophyll a/b binding protein underexpressed1 (cue1)/nitric oxide overproducer1 (nox1) result in reduced PIN1 expression and auxin accumulation in root tips. The auxin receptors protein TIR1 is S-nitrosylated by NO, suggesting that this protein is a direct target of NO in the regulation of root development (Terrile et al., 2012).Because NO is a free radical, NO levels are dynamically regulated by endogenous and environmental cues. Many phytohormones, including abscisic acid, auxin, cytokinin, salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, and ethylene, induce NO biosynthesis (Zottini et al., 2007; Kolbert et al., 2008; Tun et al., 2008; García et al., 2011). In addition, many abiotic and biotic stresses or stimuli, such as cold, heat, salt, drought, heavy metals, and pathogens/elicitors, also stimulate NO biosynthesis (Zhao et al., 2009; Mandal et al., 2012). Salt stress stimulates NO and ONOO^– accumulation in roots (Corpas et al., 2009), but the contribution of NO to root meristem growth under salinity stress has yet to be examined in detail.In this study, we found that salt stress significantly down-regulated the expression of PIN genes and promoted AUXIN RESISTANT3 (AXR3)/IAA17 stabilization. Furthermore, salt stress stimulated NO accumulation, and pharmacological inhibition of NO biosynthesis compromised the salt-mediated reduction in root meristem size. Our results support a model in which salt stress reduces root meristem size by increasing NO accumulation, which represses PIN expression and stabilizes IAA17, thereby reducing auxin levels and repressing auxin signaling.     

Phytochrome B Promotes Branching in Arabidopsis by Suppressing Auxin Signaling

Many plants respond to competition signals generated by neighbors by evoking the shade avoidance syndrome, including increased main stem elongation and reduced branching. Vegetation-induced reduction in the red light:far-red light ratio provides a competition signal sensed by phytochromes. Plants deficient in phytochrome B (phyB) exhibit a constitutive shade avoidance syndrome including reduced branching. Because auxin in the polar auxin transport stream (PATS) inhibits axillary bud outgrowth, its role in regulating the phyB branching phenotype was tested. Removing the main shoot PATS auxin source by decapitation or chemically inhibiting the PATS strongly stimulated branching in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) deficient in phyB, but had a modest effect in the wild type. Whereas indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) levels were elevated in young phyB seedlings, there was less IAA in mature stems compared with the wild type. A split plate assay of bud outgrowth kinetics indicated that low auxin levels inhibited phyB buds more than the wild type. Because the auxin response could be a result of either the auxin signaling status or the bud’s ability to export auxin into the main shoot PATS, both parameters were assessed. Main shoots of phyB had less absolute auxin transport capacity compared with the wild type, but equal or greater capacity when based on the relative amounts of native IAA in the stems. Thus, auxin transport capacity was unlikely to restrict branching. Both shoots of young phyB seedlings and mature stem segments showed elevated expression of auxin-responsive genes and expression was further increased by auxin treatment, suggesting that phyB suppresses auxin signaling to promote branching.The development of shoot branches is a multistep process with many potential points of regulation. After the formation of an axillary meristem in the leaf axil, an axillary bud may form through the generation of leaves and other tissues. The axillary bud may grow out to form a branch, or may remain dormant or semidormant for an indefinite period of time (Bennett and Leyser, 2006). In Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the position of the bud in the rosette is a strong determinant of its fate, with upper buds displaying greater outgrowth potential than lower buds. In fact, the varying potential of buds at different positions is maintained even in buds that are activated to form branches, with the upper buds growing out first and most robustly, and lower buds growing out after a time lag and with less vigor (Hempel and Feldman, 1994; Finlayson et al., 2010).The disparate fate of buds at different rosette positions is mediated, at least in part, by the process of correlative inhibition, whereby remote parts of the plant inhibit the outgrowth of the buds (Cline, 1997). Correlative inhibition is typically associated with the bud-inhibiting effects of auxin sourced in the shoot apex and transported basipetally in the polar auxin transport stream (PATS). Auxin in the PATS does not enter the bud and thus must act indirectly; however, the exact mechanism by which auxin inhibits bud outgrowth is not well understood, despite many years of intensive study (Waldie et al., 2010; Domagalska and Leyser, 2011). Evidence supports divergent models by which auxin may regulate branching. One model contends that the PATS modulates a bud outgrowth inhibiting second messenger (Brewer et al., 2009). Another model postulates a mechanism whereby competition between the main shoot and the axillary bud for auxin export in the PATS regulates bud activity (Bennett et al., 2006; Prusinkiewicz et al., 2009; Balla et al., 2011).In addition to intrinsic developmental programming, branching is also modulated by environmental signals, including competition signals generated by neighboring plants. The red light:far-red light ratio (R:FR) is an established competition signal that is modified (reduced) by neighboring plants and sensed by the phytochrome family of photoreceptors. A low R:FR evokes the shade avoidance syndrome with plants displaying, among other phenotypes, enhanced shoot elongation and reduced branching (Smith, 1995; Ballaré, 1999; Franklin and Whitelam, 2005; Casal, 2012). Phytochrome B (phyB) is the major sensor contributing to R:FR responses, and loss of phyB function results in a plant that displays a phenotype similar to constitutive shade avoidance. It should be noted that actual shade avoidance is mediated by additional phytochromes and that the complete absence of functional phyB in the loss-of-function mutant may also result in a phenotype that does not exactly mirror shade avoidance. Loss of phyB function leads to reduced branching and altered expression of genes associated with hormone pathways and bud development in the axillary buds (Kebrom et al., 2006; Finlayson et al., 2010; Kebrom et al., 2010; Su et al., 2011). In Arabidopsis, phyB deficiency differentially affects the outgrowth of buds from specific positions in the rosette and thus demonstrates an important function in the regulation of correlative inhibition (Finlayson et al., 2010; Su et al., 2011), a process known to be influenced by auxin. Many aspects of auxin signaling are dependent on AUXIN RESISTANT1 (AXR1), which participates in activating the Skip-Cullin-F-box auxin signaling module (del Pozo et al., 2002). Reduced auxin signaling resulting from AXR1 deficiency enabled phyB-deficient plants to branch profusely and reduced correlative inhibition, thus establishing auxin signaling downstream of phyB action (Finlayson et al., 2010). Although a link between auxin signaling and phyB regulation of branching was demonstrated, the details of the interaction were not discovered.The relationship between auxin and shade avoidance responses has been investigated in some detail. Auxin signaling was implicated in shade avoidance responses mediated by ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA HOMEOBOX PROTEIN2 in young Arabidopsis seedlings (Steindler et al., 1999). Rapid changes in leaf development resulting from canopy shade were also shown to involve TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1-dependent auxin signaling (Carabelli et al., 2007). A link between auxin abundance and the response to the R:FR was demonstrated in Arabidopsis deficient for the TRP AMINOTRANSFERASE OF ARABIDOPSIS1 (TAA1) auxin biosynthetic enzyme (Tao et al., 2008). Young wild-type seedlings respond to a decreased R:FR by increasing indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) biosynthesis, accumulating IAA, increasing hypocotyl and petiole elongation, and increasing leaf elevation. However, these responses are reduced in plants deficient in TAA1. Subsequent studies confirmed the importance of auxin in responses to the R:FR (Pierik et al., 2009; Kozuka et al., 2010; Keller et al., 2011), and also identified the auxin transporter PIN-FORMED3 as essential for hypocotyl elongation responses in young seedlings (Keuskamp et al., 2010). In addition to the roles of auxin abundance and transport in the process, auxin sensitivity has also been implicated in shade avoidance. Several auxin signaling genes are direct targets of the phytochrome signaling component PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR5 (PIF5), and these genes are misregulated in Arabidopsis deficient in either PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR4 (PIF4) or PIF5 (Hornitschek et al., 2012; Sun et al., 2013). Auxin-responsive hypocotyl elongation and auxin-induced gene expression were also reduced in young seedlings of the pif4pif5 double mutant (Hornitschek et al., 2012), which show defects in shade avoidance responses (Lorrain et al., 2008).Although some aspects of the regulation of branching are now understood, there are still many gaps in our knowledge of the process, especially as related to the regulation of branching by light signals. Because auxin is known to play a major role in regulating branch development, and because recent studies have implicated auxin in general shade avoidance responses and specifically in the regulation of branching by phyB, the hypothesis that auxin homeostasis, transport, and/or signaling may contribute to the hypobranching phenotype of phyB-deficient plants was generated and tested, using a variety of physiological and molecular approaches.