BIOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR OF FRIGATEBIRDS FREGATA SPP. ON ALDABRA ATOLL

Both species nested in mixed colonies in mangrove trees. The tops of trees were usually occupied exclusively by minor and the lower parts by ariel, but most nests of both species were in the intermediate parts of the canopy. The main laying season for both species was July to January. A census showed about 27 000 individuals present at the height of the season (1500 breeding pairs of minor, 5350 of ariel). Seasonal variation in numbers could be accounted for almost entirely by the changes in breeding activity of a resident population. Young of both species were fed at or near the nest-site for at least four months after fledging. A recovery near Bombay of a wing-tagged immature ariel shows that this species, at least, undergoes a post-fledging dispersal; it is suggested that young minor either do not disperse, or do so later than ariel. Food samples collected from chicks showed no overall difference between the species, but a seasonal analysis showed that ariel took more squid than minor in the wet season, and in the dry season the two species took different proportions of the two commonest species of flying-fish. Chicks of ariel received smaller meals than minor chicks in the wet season, but similar-sized meals in the dry season; ariel chicks grew more slowly than minor chicks. It is suggested that the timing of the breeding season is related to the need for adults to build up fat reserves to carry them through the courtship, nest-building and laying periods, when they are tied to the colony and so have little opportunity to feed. The evidence for non-annual breeding in frigatebirds is discussed. It is concluded that while successful breeders must breed at intervals of more than 12 months, they could theoretically nest in two successive seasons and that, since breeding success is low, most individuals probably do so. Existing knowledge of the biology of four of the five recognized species of frigatebirds is summarized, and shows that the family is at least as uniform as the tropicbirds and much more so than other Pelicaniformes.     

FIELD OBSERVATIONS ON FEEDING OF THE LAND SNAIL HELIX ASPERSA MULLER

Feeding of the land snail Helix aspersa (Müller) was observedat monthly intervals. Three natural populations in Galicia (NW-Spain)were studied. At two sites only a few plants constituted thebulk of the diet and in spring the snails' diet had the highestdiversity (H'). In the third population feeding and distributionof Helix aspersa (Müller) were observed in a small plotwith permanent patches of Urtica dioica. Nearly one half offeeding snails fed upon Urtica dioica. Most of the other observations wereon Mentha suaveolens, Ranunculus repens and Gramineae. The diversity ofthe snails' diet showed seasonal variation with the maximumin the autumn months. Comparison between the availability ofthe different plant species and their contribution to the snails'diet showed that the snails did not eat at random; Urtica dioicawas eaten much more than expected from its occurrence and grasseswere strongly under-represented in the snails' diet. Temporalchanges of availability were significantly correlated with the amountseaten in the case of Urtica, but not for the other food plants.The distribution of the snails in the plot was significantlycorrelated with that of Urtica. Chemical analyses of the foodplants revealed Urtica as the species with the higher protein,ash and calcium contents. The strong preference of Helix aspersafor Urtica dioica could be explained by the value of Urticaas food or by its suitability as habitat for the snails. The largestproportions of green material in the snails' diet occurred inthe spring and juveniles ate more green material than adultsin the three populations. (Received 16 March 1998; accepted 30 November 1998)     

ASSESSING KILLER WHALE PREDATION ON STELLER SEA LIONS FROM FIELD OBSERVATIONS IN KENAI FJORDS, ALASKA

The behavioral and predatory patterns of Gulf of Alaska (GOA) transient killer whales ( Orcinus orca ) were studied between 2000 and 2005 using remote video and vessel-based observations near the Chiswell Island Steller sea lion ( Eumetopias jubatus ) rookery and in the broader Kenai Fjords (KF) region of the northern GOA. GOA transient killer whales were observed on 118 d over the 6-yr period; the median group size was two (range: 1–9). Nine predation events were observed from vessels and an additional sixteen were inferred from remote video studies; all involved Steller sea lions. Estimates from field observations suggest that fifty-nine sea lions were consumed over the summer seasons of 2002–2005; whereas estimates based on published caloric requirements of transient killer whales would suggest a loss of 103 sea lions over the same time period. GOA transients spent a large proportion (43%) of their time resting which may be a strategy for conserving energy. Predation on sea lion pups at the Chiswell Island rookery was greatest during years when a single killer whale was foraging alone and when a 1.5-yr-old calf was evidently being trained to handle prey. Predation on pups was low during years when killer whales were foraging in groups and were observed and presumed to be taking mostly juvenile sea lions. Our study suggests that GOA transients are having a minor effect on the recovery of Steller sea lions in the GOA.     

OBSERVATIONS ON APPLE CANKER

Field observations on leaf-scar canker of apple confirm its importance in the southwest of England: on a heavily infected tree more than 5% of the current year's growth may be damaged. Leaf scars may become infected by spores of Nectria galligena which are sucked into the tracheids of a freshly exposed scar where they develop in a relatively protected environment. These freshly exposed scars become much less susceptible to infection after approximately one hour.
Infections established in leaf scars may develop immediately into cankers or they may be confined by a suberized or gum barrier. Mycelium from some of these confined lesions may spread into the surrounding healthy tissue through growth cracks when the buds develop. The lesions extend throughout the winter and spring; usually the scars earliest inoculated are the first to show cankers. It seems possible that infections of this type might be controlled by eradicant sprays applied just before leaf-fall.     

GROWTH IN MEDEOLA VIRGINIANA CLONES I. FIELD OBSERVATIONS

The pattern of clonal growth in Medeola virginiana was mapped over twelve square meters in a successional white pine forest of eastern Massachusetts. From these maps and an additional sample of excavated plants, the distances and angles of divergence of daughter ramets from the base of the parent shoot were measured for 213 plants. All clonal growth parameters were found to be highly variable in the ñeld, with coefficients of variation ranging from 17–92%. The rules describing the pattern of growth of daughter ramets were found to be considerably more complicated than previously reported (Bell, 1974). The mortality of tubers, the natural variation of parameters of growth, and the complex patterns of daughter production all call into question the ability of idealized, deterministic models of growth to predict the form of clones and the position of ramets in the field.