Human histone acetyltransferase 1 protein preferentially acetylates H4 histone molecules in H3.1-H4 over H3.3-H4

In mammalian cells, canonical histone H3 (H3.1) and H3 variant (H3.3) differ by five amino acids and are assembled, along with histone H4, into nucleosomes via distinct nucleosome assembly pathways. H3.1-H4 molecules are assembled by histone chaperone CAF-1 in a replication-coupled process, whereas H3.3-H4 are assembled via HIRA in a replication-independent pathway. Newly synthesized histone H4 is acetylated at lysine 5 and 12 (H4K5,12) by histone acetyltransferase 1 (HAT1). However, it remains unclear whether HAT1 and H4K5,12ac differentially regulate these two nucleosome assembly processes. Here, we show that HAT1 binds and acetylates H4 in H3.1-H4 molecules preferentially over H4 in H3.3-H4. Depletion of Hat1, the catalytic subunit of HAT1 complex, results in reduced H3.1 occupancy at H3.1-enriched genes and reduced association of Importin 4 with H3.1, but not H3.3. Finally, depletion of Hat1 or CAF-1p150 leads to changes in expression of a H3.1-enriched gene. These results indicate that HAT1 differentially impacts nucleosome assembly of H3.1-H4 and H3.3-H4.     

Cross-talk between histone modifications in response to histone deacetylase inhibitors: MLL4 links histone H3 acetylation and histone H3K4 methylation

Histones are subject to a wide variety of post-translational modifications that play a central role in gene activation and silencing. We have used histone modification-specific antibodies to demonstrate that two histone modifications involved in gene activation, histone H3 acetylation and H3 lysine 4 methylation, are functionally linked. This interaction, in which the extent of histone H3 acetylation determines both the abundance and the "degree" of H3K4 methylation, plays a major role in the epigenetic response to histone deacetylase inhibitors. A combination of in vivo knockdown experiments and in vitro methyltransferase assays shows that the abundance of H3K4 methylation is regulated by the activities of two opposing enzyme activities, the methyltransferase MLL4, which is stimulated by acetylated substrates, and a novel and as yet unidentified H3K4me3 demethylase.     

Presence of negative supercoiling in aggregates of histone H1-plasmidic polynucleosome complexes

It was shown in the past that in the presence of histone H1, plasmidic polynucleosomes formed densely packed aggregates. Our current studies demonstrate that these aggregates are susceptible to the actions of E. coli topoisomerase I, human topoisomerase I and DNA nicking enzyme, which is the indication that negative supercoiling is present in the condensed DNA-protein complexes. Since negative supercoiling leads to formation of highly curved and compact plectonemic and toroidal DNA structures, it would be reasonable to assume that DNA negative supercoils are responsible for aggregation of histone H1-plasmidic polynucleosome complexes.     

Trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4 impairs methylation of histone H3 lysine 9

Chromatin is broadly compartmentalized in two defined states: euchromatin and heterochromatin. Generally, euchromatin is trimethylated on histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4^me3) while heterochromatin contains the H3K9^me3 marks. The H3K9^me3 modification is added by lysine methyltransferases (KMTs) such as SETDB1. Herein, we show that SETDB1 interacts with its substrate H3, but only in the absence of the euchromatic mark H3K4^me3. In addition, we show that SETDB1 fails to methylate substrates containing the H3K4^me3 mark. Likewise, the functionally related H3K9 KMTs G9A, GLP, and SUV39H1 also fail to bind and to methylate H3K4^me3 substrates. Accordingly, we provide in vivo evidence that H3K9^me2-enriched histones are devoid of H3K4^me2/3 and that histones depleted of H3K4^me2/3 have elevated H3K9^me2/3. The correlation between the loss of interaction of these KMTs with H3K4^me3 and concomitant methylation impairment leads to the postulate that, at least these four KMTs, require stable interaction with their respective substrates for optimal activity. Thus, novel substrates could be discovered via the identification of KMT interacting proteins. Indeed, we find that SETDB1 binds to and methylates a novel substrate, the inhibitor of growth protein ING2, while SUV39H1 binds to and methylates the heterochromatin protein HP1α. Thus, our observations suggest a mechanism of post-translational regulation of lysine methylation and propose a potential mechanism for the segregation of the biologically opposing marks, H3K4^me3 and H3K9^me3. Furthermore, the correlation between H3-KMTs interaction and substrate methylation highlights that the identification of novel KMT substrates may be facilitated by the identification of interaction partners.     

SETting the clock for histone H4 monomethylation

In this and a previous issue of Molecular Cell, Oda et al. (2010), Abbas et al. (2010), and Centore et al. (2010) determined that the H4K20 histone methyltransferase PR-Set7/Set8 is posttranslationally regulated by the PCNA-dependent CRL4(Cdt2) ubiquitin ligase.     

Intermolecular histone H4 interactions in core nucleosomes

Chicken histone H4, labeled at methionine-84 with 1-N-pyrenyliodoacetamide, has been incorporated into a nucleosome-like particle with core length DNA and unmodified histones H2A, H2B, and H3. These synthetic nucleosomes exhibit properties very similar to those displayed by native particles and those labeled with other fluors. The emission spectrum of the pyrene-labeled nucleosome was characteristic of excited dimer (excimer) fluorescence, indicating that the single pyrene groups on the two H4 molecules are in close proximity in the reconstituted particle. Histone H4 was also labeled randomly at lysines with a group that contains two pyrene moieties separated by 12 A at most. Incorporation of this histone into nucleosome-like particles provides an excimer standard which does not depend on intermolecular interactions. The properties of the pyrene-containing nucleosome were examined as a function of ionic strength. It was found that the H4-H4 pyrene excimer fluorescence exhibited a cooperative disruption centered at 0.1 M NaCl which preceded increases in accessibility and environment polarity revealed by other fluors attached at the same site.     

Localization of two antigenic determinants in histone H4

Four overlapping synthetic peptides corresponding to the carboxy-terminal region 80-102 of histone H4 were prepared by solid-phase peptide synthesis. Their antigenic activity was analysed by inhibition of the H4-anti-H4 reaction in complement fixation and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. One antigenic determinant was localized in residues 88-96 of the H4 molecule. No antigenic activity was found in peptides 80-89 and 97-102. Antibodies induced by peptide 85-102 were found to bind to free H4 in solution but not to chromatin subunits, suggesting a lack of accessibility of the C-terminal region of H4 in nucleosomes. A second epitope was found to be situated in the N-terminal region 1-53 of histone H4.     

The histone H3 and H4 mRNAs are polyadenylated in maize

Northern blot analysis revealed that the histone H3 and H4 mRNAs are of unusual large size in germinating maize embryos. S1-mapping experiments show that the 3'-untranslated regions of the mRNAs transcribed from 3 H3 and 2 H4 maize genes previously described are much longer than in the non-polyadenylated histone mRNAs which represent a major class in animals. Moreover, oligo d(T) cellulose fractionation of RNAs isolated at different developmental stages indicates that more than 99% of the maize H3 and H4 mRNAs are polyadenylated. A putative polyadenylation signal is present in all five genes 17 to 27 nucleotides before the 3'-ends of the mRNAs.     

Cap-assisted internal initiation of translation of histone H4

1. Download : Download high-res image (186KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

Highlights? Two structural elements of histone H4 mRNA drive translation initiation ? Ribosome is tethered by an eIF4E-binding site located in the coding region ? A RNA three-way helix junction element positions ribosome on the start codon ? The m⁷G cap-binding pocket formed by the mRNA controls histone translation