Distinct and redundant functions of histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 in proliferation and tumorigenesis

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are negative regulators of gene expression and have been implicated in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Therefore, HDACs are promising targets for antitumor drugs. However, the relevant isoforms of the 18 members encompassing HDAC family have not been identified. Studies utilizing either gene targeting or knockdown approaches reveal both specific and redundant functions of the closely related class I deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 in the control of proliferation and differentiation. Combined ablation of HDAC1 and HDAC2 in different cell types led to a severe proliferation defects or enhanced apoptosis supporting the idea that both enzymes are relevant targets for tumor therapy. In a recent study on the role of HDAC1 in teratoma formation we have reported a novel and surprising function of HDAC1 in tumorigenesis. In this tumor model HDAC1 attenuates proliferation during teratoma formation. In the present work we discuss new findings on redundant and unique functions of HDAC1 and HDAC2 as regulators of proliferation and tumorigenesis and potential implications for applications of HDAC inhibitors as therapeutic drugs.Key words: tumor therapy, HDAC inhibitor, teratoma, chromatin, epigenetics, proliferation, histone acetylation, tumorigenesis     

A toolbox for class I HDACs reveals isoform specific roles in gene regulation and protein acetylation

The class I histone deacetylases are essential regulators of cell fate decisions in health and disease. While pan- and class-specific HDAC inhibitors are available, these drugs do not allow a comprehensive understanding of individual HDAC function, or the therapeutic potential of isoform-specific targeting. To systematically compare the impact of individual catalytic functions of HDAC1, HDAC2 and HDAC3, we generated human HAP1 cell lines expressing catalytically inactive HDAC enzymes. Using this genetic toolbox we compare the effect of individual HDAC inhibition with the effects of class I specific inhibitors on cell viability, protein acetylation and gene expression. Individual inactivation of HDAC1 or HDAC2 has only mild effects on cell viability, while HDAC3 inactivation or loss results in DNA damage and apoptosis. Inactivation of HDAC1/HDAC2 led to increased acetylation of components of the COREST co-repressor complex, reduced deacetylase activity associated with this complex and derepression of neuronal genes. HDAC3 controls the acetylation of nuclear hormone receptor associated proteins and the expression of nuclear hormone receptor regulated genes. Acetylation of specific histone acetyltransferases and HDACs is sensitive to inactivation of HDAC1/HDAC2. Over a wide range of assays, we determined that in particular HDAC1 or HDAC2 catalytic inactivation mimics class I specific HDAC inhibitors. Importantly, we further demonstrate that catalytic inactivation of HDAC1 or HDAC2 sensitizes cells to specific cancer drugs. In summary, our systematic study revealed isoform-specific roles of HDAC1/2/3 catalytic functions. We suggest that targeted genetic inactivation of particular isoforms effectively mimics pharmacological HDAC inhibition allowing the identification of relevant HDACs as targets for therapeutic intervention.     

Distinct and redundant functions of histone deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 in proliferation and tumorigenesis

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are negative regulators of gene expression and have been implicated in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Therefore, HDACs are promising targets for anti-tumor drugs. However, the relevant isoforms of the 18 members encompassing HDAC family have not been identified. Studies utilizing either gene targeting or knockdown approaches reveal both specific and redundant functions of the closely related class I deacetylases HDAC1 and HDAC2 in the control of proliferation and differentiation. Combined ablation of HDAC1 and HDAC2 in different cell types led to a severe proliferation defects or enhanced apoptosis supporting the idea that both enzymes are relevant targets for tumor therapy. In a recent study on the role of HDAC1 in teratoma formation we have reported a novel and surprising function of HDAC1 in tumorigenesis. In this tumor model HDAC1 attenuates proliferation during teratoma formation. In the present work we discuss new findings on redundant and unique functions of HDAC1 and HDAC2 as regulators of proliferation and tumorigenesis and potential implications for applications of HDAC inhibitors as therapeutic drugs.     

New pyrrole-based histone deacetylase inhibitors: binding mode, enzyme- and cell-based investigations

Aroyl-pyrrolyl-hydroxy-amides (APHAs) are a class of synthetic HDAC inhibitors described by us since 2001. Through structure-based drug design, two isomers of the APHA lead compound 1, the 3-(2-benzoyl-1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-4-yl)-N-hydroxy-2-propenamide 2 and the 3-(2-benzoyl-1-methyl-1H-pyrrol-5-yl)-N-hydroxy-2-propenamide 3 (iso-APHAs) were designed, synthesized and tested in murine leukemia cells as antiproliferative and cytodifferentiating agents. To improve their HDAC activity and selectivity, chemical modifications at the benzoyl moieties were investigated and evaluated using three maize histone deacetylases: HD2, HD1-B (class I human HDAC homologue), and HD1-A (class II human HDAC homologue). Docking experiments on HD1-A and HD1-B homology models revealed that the different compounds selectivity profiles could be addressed to different binding modes as observed for the reference compound SAHA. Smaller hydrophobic cap groups improved class II HDAC selectivity through the interaction with HD1-A Asn89-Ser90-Ile91, while bulkier aromatic substituents increased class I HDAC selectivity. Taking into account the whole enzyme data and the functional test results, the described iso-APHAs showed a behaviour of class I/IIb HDACi, with 4b and 4i preferentially inhibiting class IIb and class I HDACs, respectively. When tested in the human leukaemia U937 cell line, 4i showed altered cell cycle (S phase arrest), joined to high (51%) apoptosis induction and significant (21%) differentiation activity.     

Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 regulate DNA replication and DNA repair: potential targets for genome stability-mechanism-based therapeutics for a subset of cancers

Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 (HDAC1,2) belong to the class I HDAC family, which are targeted by the FDA-approved small molecule HDAC inhibitors currently used in cancer therapy. HDAC1,2 are recruited to DNA break sites during DNA repair and to chromatin around forks during DNA replication. Cancer cells use DNA repair and DNA replication as survival mechanisms and to evade chemotherapy-induced cytotoxicity. Hence, it is vital to understand how HDAC1,2 function during the genome maintenance processes (DNA replication and DNA repair) in order to gain insights into the mode-of-action of HDAC inhibitors in cancer therapeutics. The first-in-class HDAC1,2-selective inhibitors and Hdac1,2 conditional knockout systems greatly facilitated dissecting the precise mechanisms by which HDAC1,2 control genome stability in normal and cancer cells. In this perspective, I summarize the findings on the mechanistic functions of class I HDACs, specifically, HDAC1,2 in genome maintenance, unanswered questions for future investigations and views on how this knowledge could be harnessed for better-targeted cancer therapeutics for a subset of cancers.     

Overlapping functions of Hdac1 and Hdac2 in cell cycle regulation and haematopoiesis

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) counterbalance acetylation of lysine residues, a protein modification involved in numerous biological processes. Here, Hdac1 and Hdac2 conditional knock‐out alleles were used to study the function of class I Hdac1 and Hdac2 in cell cycle progression and haematopoietic differentiation. Combined deletion of Hdac1 and Hdac2, or inactivation of their deacetylase activity in primary or oncogenic‐transformed fibroblasts, results in a senescence‐like G₁ cell cycle arrest, accompanied by up‐regulation of the cyclin‐dependent kinase inhibitor p21^Cip. Notably, concomitant genetic inactivation of p53 or p21^Cip indicates that Hdac1 and Hdac2 regulate p53–p21^Cip‐independent pathways critical for maintaining cell cycle progression. In vivo, we show that Hdac1 and Hdac2 are not essential for liver homeostasis. In contrast, total levels of Hdac1 and Hdac2 in the haematopoietic system are critical for erythrocyte‐megakaryocyte differentiation. Dual inactivation of Hdac1 and Hdac2 results in apoptosis of megakaryocytes and thrombocytopenia. Together, these data indicate that Hdac1 and Hdac2 have overlapping functions in cell cycle regulation and haematopoiesis. In addition, this work provides insights into mechanism‐based toxicities observed in patients treated with HDAC inhibitors.     

The epigenetic modifier trichostatin A,a histone deacetylase inhibitor,suppresses proliferation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition of lens epithelial cells

Proliferation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) of lens epithelium cells (LECs) may contribute to anterior subcapsular cataract (ASC) and posterior capsule opacification (PCO), which are important causes of visual impairment. Histone deacetylases (HDACs)-mediated epigenetic mechanism has a central role in controlling cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation and differentiation in a variety of cells and the pathogenesis of some diseases. However, whether HDACs are involved in the regulation of proliferation and EMT in LECs remain unknown. In this study, we evaluated the expression profile of HDAC family (18 genes) and found that class I and II HDACs were upregulated in transforming growth factor β2 (TGFβ2)-induced EMT in human LEC lines SRA01/04 and HLEB3. Tricostatin A (TSA), a class I and II HDAC inhibitor, suppressed the proliferation of LECs by G1 phase cell cycle arrest not only through inhibition of cyclin/CDK complexes and induction of p21 and p27, but also inactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/Akt, p38MAPK and ERK1/2 pathways. Meanwhile, TSA strongly prevented TGFβ2-induced upregulation of fibronectin, collagen type I, collagen type IV, N-cadherin, Snail and Slug. We also demonstrated that the underlying mechanism of TSA affects EMT in LECs through inhibiting the canonical TGFβ/Smad2 and the Jagged/Notch signaling pathways. Finally, we found that TSA completely prevented TGFβ2-induced ASC in the whole lens culture semi-in vivo model. Therefore, this study may provide a new insight into the pathogenesis of ASC and PCO, and suggests that epigenetic treatment with HDAC inhibitors may be a novel therapeutic approach for the prevention and treatment of ASC, PCO and other fibrotic diseases.     

Novel pyrrole-containing histone deacetylase inhibitors endowed with cytodifferentiation activity

A novel series of aroyl-pyrrolyl-hydroxy-amides (APHAs) active as histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors has been reported. The new derivatives were designed by replacing the benzene ring of the prototype 1 with both aromatic and aliphatic, monocyclic and polycyclic rings (compounds 3a-i), or by inserting a number of substituents on the methylene linker of 1 (compounds 4a-l). Compounds 3a-i and 4a-l were active at sub-micromolar level against the maize deacetylases HD1-B (class I), HD1-A (class II), and HD2. Tested at 5 microM against human HDAC1 and HDAC4, 3b, 4a, and 4j showed significant HDAC1 inhibition, whereas on HDAC4 only 4a was highly effective. On the human leukemia U937 cell line, the same compounds did not alter the cell cycle phases and failed in inducing apoptosis. However, they displayed granulocytic differentiation at 5 microM, with 3b being the most potent (76% CD11c positive cells). Tested to evaluate their effects on histone H3 and alpha-tubulin acetylation, 3b and 4a showed high H3 acetylation, whereas 4a and 4b were the most potent with alpha-tubulin as a substrate.     

Identification of histone deacetylase 3 as a biomarker for tumor recurrence following liver transplantation in HBV-associated hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Recent studies have shown that high expression levels of class I histone deacetylases (HDACs) correlate with malignant phenotype and poor prognosis in some human tumors. However, the expression patterns and prognostic role of class I HDAC isoforms in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain unclear.

Methodology/Principal Findings

The expression patterns and clinical significance of class I HDAC isoforms were assessed by immunohistochemistry in a cohort of 43 hepatitis B virus-associated HCC patients treated with liver transplantation. In addition, the effects of HDAC inhibition on HCC cell behavior were investigated by knockdown of the HDAC isoform with short interfering RNA. Class I HDACs were highly expressed in a subset of HCCs with positivity for HDAC1 in 51.2%, HDAC2 in 48.8%, and HDAC3 in 32.6% of cases. The expression levels of HDAC isoforms were significantly associated with the proliferation index of HCC. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that a high expression level of HDAC2 or HDAC3 implicated significantly reduced recurrence-free survival. Cox proportional hazards model analysis revealed HDAC3 overexpression was an unfavorable independent prognostic factor (P = 0.002; HR 3.907). In vitro, inhibition of HDAC2 and HDAC3, but not HDAC1, suppressed proliferation and the invasiveness of liver cancer cells.

Conclusions/Significance

Our findings demonstrate that HDAC3 plays a significant role in regulating tumor cell proliferation and invasion, and it could be served as a candidate biomarker for predicting the recurrence of hepatitis B virus-associated HCC following liver transplantation and a potential therapeutic target.